Top Stories -   

1

Financial woes may close WikiLeaks next year

The WikiLeaks website is seen on Monday, Oct. 24, 2011. The WikiLeaks website is seen on Monday, Oct. 24, 2011.
The WikiLeaks website is seen on Monday, Oct. 24, 2011.

View Larger Image

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (28) Facebook   

Selected Comment

Tears are wiki-leaking from my eyes. Poor Julian, he has discovered that he can't live a jet-setting lifestyle by plying in secrets.

David J

Financial woes may close WikiLeaks next year

talking about
Financial woes may close WikiLeaks next year

Date: Monday Oct. 24, 2011 8:50 PM ET

LONDON — WikiLeaks -- whose spectacular publication of classified data shook world capitals and exposed the inner workings of international diplomacy -- may be weeks away from collapse, the organization's leader said.

Although its attention-grabbing leaks spread outrage and embarrassment across military and diplomatic circles, WikiLeaks' inability to overturn the block on donations imposed by American financial companies may prove its undoing.

"If WikiLeaks does not find a way to remove this blockade we will simply not be able to continue by the turn of the new year," founder Julian Assange told journalists Monday at London's Frontline Club. "If we don't knock down the blockade we simply will not be able to continue."

As an emergency measure, Assange said his group would cease what he called "publication operations" to focus its energy on fundraising. He added that WikiLeaks -- which he said had about 20 employees -- needs an additional $3.5 million to keep it going into 2013.

WikiLeaks, launched as an online repository for confidential information, shot to notoriety with the April 2010 disclosure of footage of two Reuters journalists killed by a U.S. military strike in Baghdad.

The Pentagon had claimed that the journalists were likely "intermixed among the insurgents," but the helicopter footage, which captured U.S. airmen firing on prone figures and joking about "dead bastards," unsettled many across the world.

The video was just a foretaste. In the following months, WikiLeaks published nearly half a million secret military documents from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. As a whole the documents provided an unprecedented level of detail into the grueling, bloody conflicts. Individually, many raised concerns about the actions of the U.S. and its local allies -- for example by detailing evidence of abuse, torture and worse by Iraqi security forces.

Although U.S. officials railed against the disclosures, claiming that they were putting lives at risk, it wasn't until WikiLeaks began publishing a massive trove of 250,000 U.S. State Department cables late last year that the financial screws began to tighten.

One after the other, MasterCard Inc., Visa Europe Ltd., Bank of America Corp. Western Union Co. and Ebay Inc.'s PayPal stopped processing donations to WikiLeaks, starving the organization of cash as it was coming under intense political, financial and legal pressure.

Assange said Monday that the restrictions -- imposed in early December -- had cut off some 95 per cent of the money he believes his organization could have received.

WikiLeaks spokesman Kristinn Hrafnsson defended the estimate as "conservative," noting that in 2010 the average monthly donation to WikiLeaks had been more than 100,000 euros ($140,000), while in 2011 the amount had fallen to between 6,000 and 7,000 euros.

Each company has given its own explanation for the blockade, expressing some level of concern over the nature of the secret-spilling site. But WikiLeaks supporters often point out that MasterCard and Visa still process payments for fringe groups such as the American Ku Klux Klan or the far-right British National Party and that neither WikiLeaks nor any of its staff have been charged with any crime.

Assange said his group was being subjected to corporate censorship, a sentiment backed by Dave Winer, a visiting scholar at New York University's Arthur L. Carter Journalism Institute.

"This was done without due process, without any charges, and has been in place since December last year," he said in a blog post about the blockade. "If I want to give $100 to WikiLeaks, and if I want to use my credit card to do so, who are they to say I can't?"

WikiLeaks has recently taken steps to work around the blockade, including a series of auctions and moves toward cellphone-enabled donations. Assange said Monday that his group was switching its focus from soliciting small-time donations, which typically net about $25, to getting money from a "constellation of wealthy individuals."

He didn't elaborate, but Assange has several wealthy backers, including Frontline Club founder Vaughan Smith, whose manor house in eastern England has been put at Assange's disposal while he fights extradition to Sweden on sex crime allegations.

A decision on whether to extradite him is expected in the next few weeks. Speaking to journalists after Monday's appearance, Assange put his chances of being extradited without the possibility of appeal at "30 per cent."

Also looming in the background is a U.S. grand jury investigation into WikiLeaks' disclosures. Earlier this month, a small California-based Internet provider became the second company to confirm it was fighting a court order demanding customer account information as part of the American WikiLeaks inquiry.

WikiLeaks' suspected source, U.S. Army intelligence analyst Bradley Manning, remains in custody at Fort Leavenworth prison in Kansas.

Comments are now closed for this story

Bob
said
0 0

There seem to be an awful lot of exceptions to freedom of speech in our democracies. Even our freedom of information laws are a joke .


Prof. Pye Chartt
said
0 0

@ Stu from Strathroy: You should bid on the "Lunch with the World's Informational Savior." Good luck. Enjoy the refreshing mint julep, gourmet flatbreads, and one-sided conversation if you win.


David J
said
0 0

Shouldn't all his "Occupy" fans be able to transfer some money to him by accessing the corporate infrastructure with their iPods and SmartPhones?


Stu from Strathroy
said
0 0

I'm donating right now!


Jim in Ottawa
said
0 0

The only organization that has managed to unite all governments together on a single issue--whether that government is open or corrupt--is Wikileaks. Wikileaks should not be surprised that when you snoop through people's personal mail, diaries, and communiques, that some people may be a wee bit upset and do what they can to make life difficult for you from this day forward--I know I would if I caught someone reading my mail. I would suggest that if Wikileaks truly has a committed fan base that cares about their cause, they sould have no difficulty raising money (cash and cheques) through private donars. These are tough economic times for charities, churches, and political parties but they all seem to be soldiering on.


Chris, Alberta
said
0 0

The truth is the truth - and the only people who despise the truth are the liars.


David J
said
0 0

Tears are wiki-leaking from my eyes. Poor Julian, he has discovered that he can't live a jet-setting lifestyle by plying in secrets.


Peter L. Kamloops, BC
said
0 0

Finally, it's about time, this rapist needs to go the way of the Dodo. Good bye wikileaks and good riddance.


lz in Edmonton
said
0 0

Wikileaks IS a terrorist organization. Where I believe we need to hold governments accountable, that will not be achieved by exposing secrets openly to our emenies in the world. What Wikileaks is missing is the context of the released material. Without context, information is meaningless except for those that wish to exploit it for their OWN gains.


@ dundee
said
0 0

No company or goverment has put a muzzle on this bunch. Every one have finally realized that Julian Assange has nothing but garbage on his site. Just what has he accomplished with all his leaks other then putting peoples lives in danger. Nothing good has come out of his web site. As a mater of fact ask the young solider who betrayed his country by giving Assange some of his info how this has helped him or his family. The sooner Julian Assange is off the web the better for all of us.


Anthony
said
0 0

Assange team was upstaged by other world events - such as Arab spring. Since he is not US citizen, nor has a company doing business in the US, unlike Swiss banks, there is a little likelihood he will be harassed by various US government departments. Even Hillary does not look like she just swallowed a sour pickle ..


Dave in Edm
said
0 0

Interesting, how people who support wikileaks and their ideals of 'open government' are called 'Leftist'... I guess now that the Conservatives have their majority, the idea of open and transparent is no longer a Conservative Ideal...


dante
said
0 0

Why would anyone really care what happens to wikileaks? They produce nothing like so many dot coms. Will produce nothing, ever.... Well what about your shareholders? These companies that have no business model, with a revenue stream. Duh? Let them fail it is what they deserve... And kudos to the financial institutions for not bailing out another group of spoiled dotcom brats....


Nathan
said
0 0

The financial companies don't want to be associated with WikiLeaks because they've already has enough bad publicity in the past 3 years!


James T.
said
0 0

Before anyone makes a comment about WikiLeaks that's TOO disparaging, remember - they ARE a terrorist organization and there WILL be repercussions against you and your family. Govern yourselves accordingly. Me? I'm scare to freaking death of the digital Al-Qaeda!!!


Rob
said
0 0

I am all for transparent governments, but, what has they guy revealed that was of importance? Seems like a lot of fuss for nothing.


Mark
said
0 0

Oh...poor Assange. Maybe he could ask oh....just about every government in the world that this outrageously entitled leftist has assaulted for some help?Cry me a river.


Doug from BC
said
0 0

Stewie, how would you like everyone reading your mail and e-mail?


David in Dartmouth
said
0 0

They good way too much publicity...!!! Good riddance to bad rubbish...!!!!


W
said
0 0

This is silly. Assange can't accept a cheque from donors in London? He can't pass around the hat at occupy London? Oh that's right, everyone that I know in the GTA extolling the virtues of the occupy movement and the "revolution" haven't actually gone to the protest or ever donated money to their beloved wikiLeaks.


jim
said
0 0

The sooner, the better, Good riddance. How many people have had their safety compromised just so internet junkies have something juicy to read on their screens?


Stewie
said
0 0

It's a shame corrupt governments trying to silence the truth. Countries of the brave & free are slowly eroding and being replaced by police state governments locking up those that dare to speak the truth. Those opposed to Wiki are hard core socialist that believe the governments lies. Nothing but blind sheep being led by the big socialist governments. These same blind sheep praise the 2 biggest socialist programs on the planet, the military & the police. The hard core socialist are the hard core tea party type.


dundee
said
0 0

Hey Prof,So the fact that WikiLeaks efforts are being muzzled by the collusion of financial companies doesn't concern you. Is this underlying story too complicated for you to grasp. There's a bigger story here but you simply want to close your eyes to it.


Proud Albertan
said
0 0

Good riddance.


Prof. Pye Chartt
said
0 0

Further to my comment below, if your counter-argument is that there's no way of getting money to precious WikiLeaks: SEND A CHEQUE!


Cambob in Toronto
said
0 0

Why not just ask Anonymous to donate cash?


Prof. Pye Chartt
said
0 0

Hilarious. I guess the left-wing anti-American narcissist at the helm of WikiLeaks, Julian Assange, will have to cozy up to more rich sheep to balance the organization's books. Evidently, all the nattering nibs in WikiLeaks supportive peanut gallery in the Western world, who like to argue how "important" the organization's stream of revelatory garbage is, aren't interested in putting their money where their mouth is. Same political and ideological apathetic non-convictions that bless the "Occupy" movement today. Good luck, Mr. Assange. If it weren't for the salivating media, hanging onto your overhyped pronouncements that end up pancaking, you'd already be long forgotten.


Jack
said
0 0

aaaahhh!


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Top Stories

Labour Minister Lisa Raitt speaks in the House of Commons in Ottawa on Monday, May 28, 2012. (Adrian Wyld / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Federal government orders end to CP Rail strike

More   51 Comments 51    7 Video(s) 7

Dominic and Abby Maryk were found in Mexico four years after allegedly being abducted by their father.

Extradition sought in Winnipeg missing children case

More   4 Comments 4    3 Video(s) 3

Protesters opposing Quebec student tuition fee hikes demonstrate in Montreal, Sunday, May 27, 2012. (Graham Hughes / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Quebec, students to resume talks on tuition hikes

More   26 Comments 26    1 Video(s) 1