Top Stories -   

1

iPod turns 10: Did Steve Jobs kill or save music?

Apple CEO Steve Jobs displays the iPod mini at the Macworld Conference and Expo in San Francisco, Tuesday, Jan. 6, 2004. (AP / Marcio Jose Sanchez) Flowers, photos, apples and even an iPod are placed as a memorial to Steve Jobs at the entrance at the Apple Store in Sydney, Friday, Oct. 7, 2011. (AP / Rick Rycroft) Apple iPod Touch, bottom, iPod Nano, centre, and iPod Shuffle, top, are displayed during an Apple event, Wednesday, Sept. 1, 2010, in San Francisco. (AP / Paul Sakuma) iPod
Apple CEO Steve Jobs displays the iPod mini at the Macworld Conference and Expo in San Francisco, Tuesday, Jan. 6, 2004. (AP / Marcio Jose Sanchez)

View Larger Image

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (29) Facebook   

Selected Comment

Steve Jobs did what had to be done. The customers can now choose their songs. If the Artists want us to buy a complete album, then have 8 good songs on the album, instead of one every two years!! And royalties from iTunes is far better than napster and all, ain't it???

Get Real

iPod turns 10: Did Steve Jobs kill or save music?

talking about
iPod turns 10: Did Steve Jobs kill or save music?

Date: Sunday Oct. 9, 2011 6:22 AM ET

Ten years ago on Oct. 23, Apple CEO Steve Jobs introduced a quirky little music player that was only compatible with five per cent of American computers. "One thousand songs in your pocket" was his pitch as he showed off the five-gigabyte device, with its now iconic (vintage perhaps?) scroll wheel.

An analyst in the New York Times, which carried the story on page eight of its business section the next day, said the iPod wouldn't make much of a difference.

But Jobs, always the visionary, called the iPod a "landmark" product and history has shown the consummate salesman may have undersold it. The iPod transformed Apple into the behemoth it is today, and revolutionized the music industry in ways it's still coming to grips with.

I was in the middle of writing this article last Wednesday when I had to change assignments -- Jobs had died after years of health problems and I was going to write his obituary.

Millions of words have been lavished on Jobs since his death, an outpouring unlike any other for a billionaire entrepreneur. He's already being canonized with scientific leaders such as Thomas Edison for his contributions to personal computing and telecommunications.

But it's culturally where Jobs may have his most lasting impact, forever changing the way we listen to music and relate to music technology.

"The iPod was really the pivotal device for this century which showed that technology could not only transform our lives but also be an object of lust, in and among itself," Steven Levy, the author of the 2006 book "The Perfect Thing: How the iPod Shuffles Commerce, Culture, and Coolness" told me.

When Jobs unveiled the iPod, it wasn't the first MP3 player to hit the market, it was simply the best. I owned a Sony MiniDisc player and I still have nightmares about trying to transfer songs to it, and that was one of the better products out there.

The key to the iPod has always been its combination of aesthetics with function. In all its versions over the years it's been attractive to look at and had a simplicity that put your technophobic grandmother at ease. It was everything we didn't know we wanted.

"You can't just ask customers what they want then try to give that to them," Jobs famously said. "By the time you get it built, they'll want something new."

And where music companies sued college kids and single moms to stop Napster and the illegal downloads that were just starting to hurt the industry, with iTunes, Jobs saw dollar signs for Apple (and few less for the record labels).

In February 2010, iTunes surpassed 10 billion downloads, an impressive number considering the easy access to illegal downloads. But that hasn't saved the music business, which has seen its music stores shuttered, album sales plummet and stagnant concert revenues.

The digital revenues have been nice, but haven't come anywhere close to the cash that the massively popular bands of the 1980s and 1990s were used to.

Earlier this year, former glam rocker and current mom rocker Jon Bon Jovi went so far as to tell The Sunday Times Magazine: "Steve Jobs is personally responsible for killing the music business."

But for indie musicians, the iPod has been a blessing and a curse. It's an argument that many bands have among themselves in vans and over beers in grimy green rooms.

Nick Greaves, the guitarist (and manager) for the Juno-nominated band The Most Serene Republic, says that they've watched record sales slow drastically over the course of the last decade, even while their concerts remain popular.

"When we first started most of our marketing was aimed at Canada (the band signed to famed Toronto label Arts and Crafts in 2005) but because of the digital trends, our music went all over the world and we have fan bases in Europe and we've been able to tour there, and headline in the U.K.," he said. "Artists might not make money from physically selling their records but they can also go and tour all these places.

"We have a great following in the United States and that's probably from people going and (illegally downloading) all our records."

But Greaves' band mate, keyboardist Ryan Lenssen, is not nearly as positive, telling me over and over again that going into the music industry is a terrible idea.

Lenssen has gone back to university to study political science at the University of Toronto and has written several essays on the impact of digital media, which he says has made people value albums less.

"My father in the 1960s would spend a week's (allowance) on a single record and that was a massive amount of resources spent so he could enjoy something," he said. "He then listened to it non-stop, knew every single word, every nuance of the record."

Kids today, the 26-year-old Lenssen says, are used to instantly gratifying their musical impulses for free and tossing it aside.

"It's a massive deflation in value of media," he said. " I remember how important it was to buy something from a band (when I was younger), and how many times I'd consume it, where nowadays . . . kids, if you look at their YouTube habits, if something doesn't happen in the first 10 seconds, they are gone.

"You really have to be an abnormal listener to get through an entire three-minute song now, let alone an entire album."

But there's a reason a quirky indie band like the Most Serene Republic can find an audience.

The iPod was the massive crack in a fundamental aspect of the last half of 20th century pop culture -- there was mainstream culture, and there was the counter-culture. Our pop culture has gone democratic, and is messy and chaotic as a result. Musical tastes are much more varied today than they ever were. (Put your iPod on shuffle to test this theory: mine went indie rock, sludge metal, country, old school hip hop, indie rock.)

Pop culture is a hyper-personal and hyper-local affair, derived from Facebook feeds and pick-your-own-version-of-reality websites. Music is a choose-your-own adventure book.

The iPod can't take all the credit or blame for our post-Napster music reality. But surely, there is no better symbol.

Follow Josh Visser on Twitter

Josh.Visser@bellmedia.ca

Comments are now closed for this story

Ash
said
0 0

The whole concept of music may have gone as far as this seems to go but it is the reality of life, it all passes eventually and we have to deal with it. It is good though that some music just passes but some stick and ipods and itunes is the future of music.


Ferd The Thrid
said
0 0

Greed killed the music business not Steve Jobs. The only appeal of Bon Jovi is to middle aged house wives who want to swoon at JBJ golden locks. I can do without. Their music is trite pop. Most of the music out these days is mediocre at best and at owrst contrived, pointless, trendy and factory engineered to drive sales. I would argue pop acts like The Backstreet Boys did more to kill the music business than one man who had a vision and created the best product in it's class. It's like asking if Enzo Ferrari killed mass transit. No, readily available cheaper alternatives and changing lifestyles did that. Face it, we don't have to pay large coin for a CD with 3 good songs and be stuck with 15 bad songs.


Dan Dan
said
0 0

This whole article is ridiculous. Steve Jobs is not a musician or music industry captain. Portable devices for music listening have been around for 30 years. The creators of MP3 probably had a significant effect on the music industry, but not someone that created an MP3 player.


saved by iTunes
said
0 0

Whaetver people. I am an independent Candian artist who, despite being proud of my music, would nevet got a stupid-big record deal even if I wanted it. Through the syncing of my small independent label with online services like iTunes, I have new outlets to sell my music and have listeners across North America that I would not otherwise have without a big major label marketing push and touring beyond what I as a working father could do. As well, by only having to press enough CDs (which arent cheap to press) to sell at gigs and mail for promo, I have got out there without spending the thousands I spent pre-iTubes, etc. Yes less artists are getting rich -- I don't care. More artists are making at least some money and that's better for us all. I hope this movement kills the major label industry, we no longer need the bloated middleman between us and the listener anyways.


Guitar Man
said
0 0

@ keyboardist Ryan Lenssen: The times they are a changin'. Holding on to old values may be nice, but to make it in the music industry you have to give what the people want. Look at Justin Bieber (I'm not a fan) but he seems to have no problem making it in the music business. Keep in touch with whats going on now and be ready to change when your fans want something new.


Patrick in Greene
said
0 0

Asking if Steve Jobs killed or saved music is an odd question. The music industry is one of the largest in that we spend more disposable income on music than almost anything else. The iPod made music portable, more so than Walkmans or Discmans, since the medium is digital (MP3). This portability only increased the demand for access to music. How many of us have ripped our favourite CDs to disk, so we could put them on our MP3 player/iPod? Napster helped music sales to some extent, because a lot of us would purchase CDs that contained the songs we found on Napster. With iTunes, Steve Jobs proved that people are basically honest and were willing to pay to download music. The iPod and iTunes represent a new medium and delivery system for music, respectively. The Internet has made it easier for musicians to publish their work. Personally, the down-side of this is that we are inundated with mediocre music--something that the era of big record labels prevented.In any case, saying Steve Jobs killed the music business is overly-simplistic, and reminds me of a bumper sticker that reads, "If guns kill people, spoons make them fat." Think about it.


montreal50
said
0 0

@J Barrhaven
The IPod/IPhone plays mp3's AAC, MP4 video also other formats, but you have alot of Apple Haters that say, you can't play anything on them you have to convert everything NOT TRUE
You see what happens when you listen to people that don't know what they are talking about, you miss out on the good stuff


Jay
said
0 0

iPod and iTunes has given me exactly what I was wanting---the ability to buy and listen to music I like, and not having to buy a CD with two or three songs I like and the rest I don't. With iPod and iTunes I've bought more music then I ever did CDs and from many musicians that I was unfamiliar with prior to previewing their music on iTunes.


aj from montreal
said
0 0

**just to add up on what I stated earlier, we as consumers 'SHOULD' and 'MUST' have the right to store all of our favorite music content and not always being dependent on a company such as Apple, Google or maybe in the near future, Facebook and Microsoft, forcing us to use cloud based services.

I'm glad that Apple is still continuing to sell the 160GB iPod Classic. Soon this technology will be faced out to make room for the iPod Touch. Hopefully, Apple would reconsider making a 160GB+ touch version or better an Iphone w/ a bigger storage capacity in the near future.**


Sam C
said
0 0

Apple and the iPod has hurt the commercial music business, but Jobs simply exploited the weakness that the Music Industry created. When we could buy 45s -- singles, with a 'B-side,' music was affordable. Then they weren't available, and we had to buy an entire album to get the two or three songs we really likes -- sometimes we were pleasantly surprised by the rest of the tunes, sometimes disappointed. Apple not only gave us back the singles, but allowed us to pick-and-choose the songs WE wanted, and gave us the entire album at a much more affordable price.Record companies and their artists may not be raking in the dough the way they were in the 80s and 90s, but music is now much more accessible to the paying public.


dante vancouver
said
0 0

It is totally misleading and fallacious to blame Steve Jobs or Apple for anything like this. He and Apple did not and have never said they invented mp3. They incorporated it into their technology. Format wars by the other big players attempted to thwart this.. There is a great deal more to the battle of control by those who control dissemination of information. Are we going to put the same argument forward towards Google and control of what you search for. Yes it is true you have little control over what information you are able to access thru global corporate control of the information. You want to be top on a search, FU Pay Us. In the music industry this used to be called payola. Now it is legally implemented. That is a much more serious discussion, because small businesses suffer now if they do not pay Google a lot of money just to get to the top of the list. Since when has the music industry ever been generous to the artists? Since never.


brian from lethbridge
said
0 0

The Recording companies did it to themselves. By greedily forcing people to spend far to much to purchase "albums" instead of the couple good songs half baked artists wrote they made music inaccessible to their core market. The whole" illegal download" is killing our business is a false argument. The whole business model the recording/publishing industry operated under in the 70's to the 90's was unsustainable! The only ones who didn't know that was the production execs.


J Barrhaven
said
0 0

The iPod plays MP3s? Since when?
Last I heard, it played AAC files


aj from montreal
said
0 0

I've been reading all the recent comments about the iPod and how the device is now 10 yrs old since its inception back in 2011. I've been also reading about the history behind the device and that Music Companies and Artists would love to abolish the idea of the Non-CD platform music player and that Apple/Steve Jobs found a way to make a bridge in the middle of the canyon of artist rights and digital copying rights.

Moving 10 years later, MP3 players like the iPod are very much on demand, so much so that engineers integrated that aspect to cellphone technology (hence we call it the 'SmartPhone') as well as internet connectivity.

***What bother's me though is the impending reality of MP3 devices becoming more wireless due to what major companies now offering what we call the "cloud-computing storage" technology [iCloud, as the best example pushes ppl to purchase songs and store them instead to a cloud rather that to save it to let's say a '64 GB' iPod Touch].

To me, this devoids the concept/definition of the MP3 player so much so that we are heading to a non-complete control of all our personal data content.***


CJW
said
0 0

Mp3 files date back to around 1993 and really didn't make a significant impact until the late 1990's. Steve Jobs made it possible for people to purchase / filter their favourite songs. Steve also came up with a way of having higher quality .m4a(apple lossless) format available for those people who really wanted better sounding (true CD quality) music on portable devices . I don't think Steve Jobs killed music, I think he has made the music industry re-think the way it releases music. If the music is popular then people will purchase it regardless. Well, done Steve Jobs!


Joel Bain
said
0 0

Napster would've killed music, but iTunes spared it, IMHO.


Mike Lebreton
said
0 0

I bought close to 700 CDs in the 1990's at close to $20 a pop, then along came the MP3 and I have not bought another CD since. Digital did kill the commercial music industry - at least with me it did.


Chris, Alberta
said
0 0

I hear something I like - I buy at least the song and maybe the whole album on iTunes of course ' cos it is so easy. I have all kinds of music I would likely have never purchased as a CD or 33 in the old days. What I buy leads me to other music I might like which I usually check out. Then there's the podcasts too. It's changed everything and I would not be without it.


Gerald
said
0 0

I have hundreds of songs purchased from itunes, songs from bands such as Gov't Mule/Warren Haynes, Tedeschi Trucks, Joe Satriani and so on. ....fantastic stuff. As for Bon Jovi, it's not all about the packaged look and sound, and he probably got a lot of ideas from artists like this. We've been introduced to a lot of really great music other that the"mainstream" because of itunes and I am personally really gratefull for it, and as for Jon, he's just not in the loop any more. Thanks, Steve.


Andrew
said
0 0

The record companies failed to offer digital copies of their music soon enough. Instead of embracing the new medium, they decided to fight it. It was only in their dying breathe that they accepted the format. Even now the record companies lack innovation. Why aren't record companies offering the customers more when purchasing digital music? Why not include the lyrics in the file? Why not include access to images of the band. Give an access code with the purchase of an album that will allow you to access chats with the bands. Why do record companies lack so much imagination that they can't think of ways to encourage people to buy their music?Another falacy the record companies make in their claims of lost revenue, that every download equals a lost sale. People will be more likely to buy quality music, when given the opportunity. The majority of the fast-food music being offered today, is not what I would consider quality.


Charles Cox
said
0 0

I think Bon Jovi really meant to say, Steve Jobs killed the business of recording an album and living off it the rest of your life. Sorry, Nob Jovi, now bands have to actually perform music and write more than one good song and album to make a living. Now there are 100's of thousands of bands available to listen to instead of just 25. And now musicians are rewarded for only great music and great performances, not for making it into the old, great PR machines that, thankfully, are dead.


Andrew Stevens
said
0 0

First, Jon Rubenstein did not create the iPod. Steve Jobs is responsible for the iPod from concept, to development to marketing. I wish the Jobs haters would get their facts straight before posting their drivel. Rubinstein was responsible for hardware engineering, industrial design and axing jobs...he fired hundreds of engineers, which the Jobs haters blame on Jobs. I believe the iPod saved Apple and saved the music business. The problems both Ludites and Jobs haters have is dealing with disruptive change. They also have trouble accepting that, while Rubenstein had a hand in developing the iPod, he would not have if Steve Jobs had not told him to do so.


Tim
said
0 0

MP3 players had been around before the Ipod came out, and frankly, there are still MP3 players which aren't Ipods on the market. I wouldn't trade my Sony for an Ipod. All the Ipod did was make MP3 players trendy and expensive.


pianomangg
said
0 0

"Kids today, the 26-year-old Lenssen says, are used to instantly gratifying their musical impulses for free and tossing it aside."I would argue it's not the digital medium that has created this culture, it's the poor quality of pop music... it's easy to become tired of the 3-minute song when there's no real content contained within.


Al
said
0 0

What a great era for musicians, so many more opportunities because of this.


brades
said
0 0

Steve Jobs isn't responsible for the ipod... Jon Rubinstein is.


Get Real
said
0 0

Steve Jobs did what had to be done. The customers can now choose their songs. If the Artists want us to buy a complete album, then have 8 good songs on the album, instead of one every two years!! And royalties from iTunes is far better than napster and all, ain't it???


Jon in London ON
said
0 0

This is rich - I have to chuckle, a 26 year political science / musician complaining about the musical habits of 'kids'? 10 years ago, when the iPod was introduce, HE was a kid! As for his lament, and Bon Jovi also, well, you could always go back to selling rolls of 12 exposure film at the Photo-Mat booth.


Ivan
said
0 0

The record companies hold on what people hear has been broken. The toothpaste is out of the tube and the public have no interest in putting it back. So I have no sympathy for the Bon Jovis of the world. Without the record company PR machine behind them, Bon Jovi knows they would never have moved out of their parent's garage.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Top Stories

Labour Minister Lisa Raitt speaks in the House of Commons in Ottawa on Monday, May 28, 2012. (Adrian Wyld / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Federal government orders end to CP Rail strike

More   51 Comments 51    7 Video(s) 7

Dominic and Abby Maryk were found in Mexico four years after allegedly being abducted by their father.

Extradition sought in Winnipeg missing children case

More   4 Comments 4    3 Video(s) 3

Protesters opposing Quebec student tuition fee hikes demonstrate in Montreal, Sunday, May 27, 2012. (Graham Hughes / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Quebec, students to resume talks on tuition hikes

More   26 Comments 26    1 Video(s) 1