Top Stories -   

1
A U.S./Canada border crossing is shown on Friday November, 26, 2010. (Brent Foster / THE CANADIAN PRESS) border deal between Canada and the United States will come with a $1-billion price tag border deal between Canada and the United States will come with a $1-billion price tag

Canada, U.S. reach deal on perimeter security pact

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV News Channel: Perrin Beatty, CEO
The CEO of the Canadian Chamber of Commerce says when enhancing border security, Canada has to make sure not to do something to hurt it economically that al-Qaeda couldn't do directly.
CTV News Channel: No border deal finalized: PMO
CTV's Mercedes Stephenson says some larger-scale, 'sticky' policies like immigration and refugee statuses are not included in the border deal according to sources. She says the border deal will likely be paid for by other similar programs cut or revamped.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (25) Facebook   

A U.S./Canada border crossing is shown on Friday November, 26, 2010. (Brent Foster / THE CANADIAN PRESS) border deal between Canada and the United States will come with a $1-billion price tag border deal between Canada and the United States will come with a $1-billion price tag

Photos

A U.S./Canada border crossing is shown on Friday November, 26, 2010. (Brent Foster / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

View Larger Image

Date: Wed. Oct. 5 2011 7:00 AM ET

OTTAWA — A much-ballyhooed perimeter security deal between Canada and the United States will come with a $1-billion price tag for new border facilities and programs to make trade and travel easier, The Canadian Press has learned.

The Conservative government will use money cut from existing programs to cover the hefty cost of the international pact -- an attempt to protect the continent from terrorist threats while speeding the flow of people and products across the 49th parallel.

The deal, as described by several sources, is more evolutionary than revolutionary, falling short of the grand vision outlined with fanfare eight months ago when Prime Minister Stephen Harper and U.S. President Barack Obama announced negotiations.

Emblematic of this reality is the fact there are no immediate plans for a prime ministerial-presidential announcement of the agreement -- to be unfurled this month -- because the Prime Minister's Office has been unable to persuade the White House to make Obama available.

Canadian officials are heading to Washington this weekend to make a final pitch for a public signing ceremony.

"It's very incremental, it not big and visionary," said a source with detailed knowledge of the deal. "Which is why the White House is saying, 'Really, you expect the president to announce a working group?"'

Sources spoke on condition of anonymity because they weren't authorized to discuss the pact ahead of its public release.

The so-called Beyond the Border action plan will include some three dozen items the governments plan to pursue together. A number could be in place within months while others would take as long as four or five years to implement.

Harper has placed strong emphasis on "the things that can be done quickly" -- picking the "low-hanging fruit" as opposed to a broad, sweeping agreement that addresses every possible border issue, said one person who was briefed on the plans.

"I don't think there's going to be one big headline item," said another source familiar with the deal.

Since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the United States, both countries have been bedevilled by the challenges of shielding the continent from another assault without impeding the flow of trade across the vast border, valued at $1.6 billion a day.

Business leaders in both countries have railed against a buildup of red tape they say has undermined one of the world's most lucrative trading relationships.

According to those familiar with the negotiations, the deal will attempt to peel away layers of bureaucracy by introducing measures to improve communications on customs and security issues and streamline procedures in both countries.

This will mean "taking that to a deeper level than we've seen before in terms of the two governments sharing information on common threats," said one source.

"It's about identifying who are the bad people and what is the bad stuff that we want to keep out of North America, and the issue is how to share information to make that happen."

Both countries approach customs issues differently. The type of information that companies must provide to clear customs varies in Canada and the U.S. Therefore, a common set of customs requirements is being viewed as a big step forward.

Other measures include:

-- A "one-stop shopping" window for importers who now have to deal with up to half a dozen government agencies;

-- Less paperwork for companies that could receive duty-free treatment for shipments but currently don't bother because of the hassle;

-- Special visas for certain business travellers and more emphasis on frequent-traveller and trusted-shipper programs;

-- Detailed benchmarks that will bring each country's food and auto industries in line;

-- Synchronized planning at land border crossings, where there is now little international co-ordination. "The U.S. is expanding in some areas that the Canadians are shrinking, and the Canadians are expanding in some areas where the U.S. is shrinking," said a source. "There's going to be an effort to co-ordinate on that."

This will require Canada to make new, potentially expensive investments in screening and security technologies to keep pace with the Americans. The two countries will have to come up with joint plan for future spending.

The deal is not expected to include full-scale harmonization of immigration and refugee policies -- a possibility that has raised the hackles of critics who fear the deal will cede Canadian sovereignty to the Americans.

The perimeter security arrangement will be styled along the lines of the Canada-U.S. Smart Border Declaration -- a list of 30 initiatives announced in late 2001 to try to stave off post-9-11 border snarls.

However, the perimeter security pact is different in that it will include built-in structures aimed at ensuring things happen on schedule.

"The goal this time is to have a kind of constant implementation effort," a source said.

While the business community and many frequent travellers will likely welcome the changes, overall expectations are modest.

"I don't think it's going to be a big agreement," said Jayson Myers, president of Canadian Manufacturers and Exporters. "What they are looking at is an action plan on a number of priority items."

The Americans are distracted by deep economic problems at the moment -- a crisis that will thwart serious efforts at continental integration, said Daniel Drache, a political science professor at York University in Toronto.

"I think it will be quite modest. I don't see at this time any significant changes."

Myers said much can be done to unclog the border through tweaks at the level of customs and regulatory agencies rather than through a "big treaty."

"If we can find better ways of managing risk at the lowest possible cost, those are the things that we've got to be focusing on."

The deal could suffer if Harper and Obama can't find a way to jointly announce it at a public event, Myers added.

"Unless the prime minister and president are involved in this ... it's not going to be a priority for departments," he said.

"From the U.S. side, too, there's a lot of political capital that's gone into this, and I think (Obama) needs to show he's serious about trade."

Earlier this week, Liberal Leader Bob Rae criticized the Conservatives for continuing to pursue the border deal even though Obama's new job creation plan contained "Buy American" protectionist measures.

"All I'm saying is it's completely nuts to sign a deal when we're getting hit every day of the week from the other side," said Rae. "It just doesn't make sense."

Comments are now closed for this story

Max
said

Canadian Taxpayers, bend over, we are being screwed again. Just a bunch of smoke & mirrors to make it look like they are really doing something - nothing more that fear mongering at a huge price.


Stella in Toronto
said

Wow, some individuals comments are so clueless it actually makes me laugh.Personally I am all for improving the flow of goods across the border and for increasing security. Well done PM Harper!


Rome fell
said

Why our borders are not like the EU's is beyond me. If the Americans want to beef up theirs, put up fences, by all means. I say put up a huge concrete one, which will protect us from them when their economy and the US..........fail.


Plabo
said

Our billion dollar man is still on the go !!


Jay in Stoon
said

Hmmm... a billion dollars for border security, $4 billion for new jails, gold-embossed business cards with no mention of Canada on them.... and yet I can't get enough money to teach the Science program properly in my classroom. NOW it feels like the states!


DJONTHEROCK
said

Enough already. Just take the 25 Billion to run that Border and deploy funds elsewhere. What a huge waste of Money. Why is it that the smugglers are the only ones who don't have border issues? That is the reality. Come on Harper/Obama, get a pair and make some real changes that make common sense.


Will
said

Oh, please........ commentators such as eddytoronto etc have nothing but their neo-communistic rants and anti-harper attitudes to bring out here. Grow up, trade is the lifeblood of a nations economy.


Owe Canada
said

Is this the same as the USA Mexico arrangement? Without this arrangement, roughly how many terrorist attacks have taken place in the USA since 9/11? Roughly? Waste of money. We could have bought and financed a couple more hockey teams. That's what makes us Canada!


AG
said

I am the example case of a hippie like non employed person that the secret service and RCMP look for vagabonds in english Canada and not in Quebec were i reside. Pierre Elliot Trudeu had the idea and in the secret info section of the Canadian gov records. It something to do with dream statein the early and mid afternoon while dazed and confused (clue) between that era and around this era between 1978 and 1980


Gorg
said

The powers that be in the USA are still deciding on a style of fence. Maybe it will be a friendly "good neighbour fence" topped with razor wire and backed with landmines and dotted with machinegun nests along the way (from the USA side of course).


eddytoronto
said

RON PAUL will change EVERYTHING....If he is NOT elected its OVER you will see Revolution!


Bob NS
said

Hey, we are the same people with mostly the same origin, we live the same way, we mostly speak the same language, we eat the same, watch the same movies, enjoy the same sports, drive the same cars and the list goes on.We are Canadians with our values like any other part of North America. Altogether we are too close to be divided. The arrangements of pre 9/11 in regard to the border were the best. All we need to do is have a North American Security system against terrorism no more no less. Bob NS


Dennis L. Krahn
said

Andrew Stevens: I was going to comment; when I read your post I realised I wouldn't need to do so.Same thoughts, different verbage.


Gerald
said

Americanada ?


Doug On
said

Since we are tied together by geography, we need the free interchange of goods and people with our biggest trading partner. However, since the presidential election is coming up next year, and with American politcians calling for more trade protectionisn, this is probably not a good time to push for a big signing ceremony with all it's media interest.


paul b
said

I don't think there a real interest in going state side by most Canadians. Its all hype and made to bring US attention. We should look north and build our own country.


Vienna in Cambridge, Ontario
said

So Harper is stealing from Canadian tax payers and families and giving it to the Americans. That's fantastic. I would encourage Harper to accept American citizenship and just get it over with. Neither Timothy McVeigh nor the 9/11 attackers were Canadian nor did they cross into the USA using our border. We're the new Iraq.


Pooh
said

Welcome to the United States of Canada.


tristan
said

Just pathetic, again our gov wants to try and tie us to American thinking and sell off our sovreignty. Look at every joint security operation we've done with USA. Their in charge, call the shots while we get dragged around like the step child no one wants. If they really want to keep terrorists from hitting Canada then cut ties with the Yanks. Being one of the worst war crimes and human rights abusers in the last 50 years lacky realy does alot for us on the international stage.


pacifier
said

You can bet the divisive tidbits are buried under "classified". This issue points out the political divide like no other that exists in Canada today. Those who crave freedom and sovereignty despise the marriage and those who feel warm and fuzzy under the Uncle Sam security blanket love it. The truth is the corporatist always ragging on others about wanting a nanny state are the ones sucking on the pacifier.


Andrew Stevens
said

Ahead of the barrage of snide and ridiculous comments, I'll state that this is good, if a decade too late. The major benefit to Canada is that it will boost the flow of goods through the border, which historically has been mostly one way, from Canada to eager US consumers. With the death of US Consumerism, I have to wonder if this is really needed? It's not like your average American is in any position to go and splurge on relatively pricey Canadian made goods. Like it or not, the good old trusty American consumer was the spark that lit economic fires all over the planet and with the state of the US economy, those fires are all but out. Just ask the Chinese. They have thousands of crap factories slowed to a crawl because US consumerism has all but disappeared.


mike
said

Typical harper.. trying to make a huge media deal over something he barely accomplished.

example 2: they shouldn't take credit for the economy. We do well when commodities are up, and down when there is less demand for them...nothing Harper controls.


Grizz
said

One step closer to the North American Union I see. Goodbye sovereignty, goodbye Canada.


Ry in the Hammer
said

Just get rid of the border between Canada and the US and create a customs union between the two countries. The idea of a border between the two countries has only come to fruition in the last 60 years. Before that, it was a road sign "Welcome to Canada". The whole idea of a border is simply to give a false sense of security to American's who feel terrorists come from Canada, and shallow Canadians who feel that the fence is the only remaining symbol that defines what Canada is. All that for more than $10 billion a year in Canada alone. Simply create a single-gateway to North America and call it a day. I'll still be a Canadian whether there is a fence there or not.


Just askin'
said

What about the fence ? Is that no longer a part of the plan?


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Top Stories

Labour Minister Lisa Raitt speaks in the House of Commons in Ottawa on Monday, May 28, 2012. (Adrian Wyld / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Federal government orders end to CP Rail strike

More   51 Comments 51    7 Video(s) 7

Dominic and Abby Maryk were found in Mexico four years after allegedly being abducted by their father.

Extradition sought in Winnipeg missing children case

More   4 Comments 4    3 Video(s) 3

Protesters opposing Quebec student tuition fee hikes demonstrate in Montreal, Sunday, May 27, 2012. (Graham Hughes / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Quebec, students to resume talks on tuition hikes

More   26 Comments 26    1 Video(s) 1