Top Stories -   

1
Ottawa, pipeline, protest Alberta, U.S., oilsands, pressure Protesters cross a security fence as they join the Council of Canadians and Greenpeace Canada in holding a rally featuring a civil disobedience sit-in against the tar sands on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Monday, Sept. 26, 2011. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS) pipeline, keystone XL, protesters, Parliament Hill oilsands protest on parliamsnt hill, people arrested oilsands protest on parliamsnt hill, people arrested Hundreds of police patrol Parliament Hill before protest Hundreds of police patrol Parliament Hill before protest This Sept. 19, 2011 aerial photo shows a tar sands tailings pond at a mine facility near Fort McMurray, in Alberta, Canada. Environmentalists hoping to block a proposed underground oil pipeline that would snake 1,700 miles from Canada to the Gulf of Mexico have pinned their hopes on an unlikely ally _ the conservative state of Nebraska where opposition to Keystone XL pipeline has risen steadily since the project was proposed three years ago. Public hearings will start Sept. 27, in Lincoln on the 16-inch steel pipe that if built would carry oil extracted from tar sands in Alberta, Canada, through Montana, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas and Oklahoma to refineries in Texas. (Jeff McIntosh / THE CANADIAN PRESS) Alberta, U.S., oilsands, pressure Parliament hill protest oilsands

Pipeline protesters cross barricades on Parliament Hill

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV National News: Daniele Hamamdjian reports
More than 100 environmentalists were arrested during a protest against a proposed billion-dollar pipeline.
CTV National News: Paul Workman on the jobs
CTV's Washington bureau chief discusses the prime minister's take on the U.S. approval of the pipeline.
CTV Edmonton: Kevin Armstrong on the protest
More than 100 environmentalists were arrested in Ottawa Monday after trying to storm Parliament. They were protesting a proposed billion-dollar pipeline that would carry oilsands crude from Alberta to Texas.
CTV Calgary: Bridget Brown reports on the protest
Environmental protesters gathered on Parliament Hill have begun a planned mass act of 'civil disobedience,' as they seek to draw public attention to a controversial pipeline project they oppose.
CTV Ottawa: John Hua on the demonstration
Both police and protesters contributed to a calm demonstration against the Keystone XL pipeline Monday on Parliament Hill that saw about 100 arrested, but no violence.
Power Play: Joe Oliver, Natural Resource Minister
The Natural Resource Minister says that the Keystone pipeline is in Canada's interest as it provides national security, jobs, and economic growth.
Power Play: Tantoo Cardinal, protester
A Keystone protester says that Green energy is important and can be successful if everyone works together in moving towards that goal. She says it can be difficult as oil companies have been a powerful force for a long time.
CTV News Channel: Dr. Patrick Moore, co-founder
The co-founder of Greenpeace says the oilsands are granting contracts to First Nations people. He also says we can't really get the oil to Texas in any other way.
CTV News Channel: Clayton Thomas-Muller, protester
An oilsands protester explains the purpose of the protest and what message they are trying to send to the Canadian and U.S. governments. He also discusses whether protesters plan to try and get into parliament for a sit in.
CTV Edmonton: Kevin Armstrong on the barricades
Environmental protesters gathered on Parliament Hill have begun a planned mass act of 'civil disobedience,' as they seek to draw public attention to a controversial pipeline project they oppose.
CTV News Channel: Don Martin in the crowd
The host of CTV's Power Play says it's a very quiet and well behaved pipeline protest in Ottawa that has drawn approximately five hundred people.
CTV News Extended: Protesters gather in Ottawa
This extended video shows protesters beginning to gather on Parliament Hill as police stand guard in what's being called an a planned act of 'civil disobedience.'
CTV Ottawa: Andrea Hajden-Donahue explains
A member of the Council of Canadians speaks from Parliament Hill, where she says there are waves of demonstrators slowly and deliberately approaching the security barrier keeping them from the House of Commons.
CTV News Channel: Mike Hudema in Ottawa
An activist with Greenpeace says the protest is meant to remind Harper of the government's responsibilities to the environment, and explains how the economy should be more diversified with 'green' jobs.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (148) Facebook   

Ottawa, pipeline, protest Alberta, U.S., oilsands, pressure Protesters cross a security fence as they join the Council of Canadians and Greenpeace Canada in holding a rally featuring a civil disobedience sit-in against the tar sands on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Monday, Sept. 26, 2011. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS) pipeline, keystone XL, protesters, Parliament Hill oilsands protest on parliamsnt hill, people arrested oilsands protest on parliamsnt hill, people arrested Hundreds of police patrol Parliament Hill before protest Hundreds of police patrol Parliament Hill before protest This Sept. 19, 2011 aerial photo shows a tar sands tailings pond at a mine facility near Fort McMurray, in Alberta, Canada. Environmentalists hoping to block a proposed underground oil pipeline that would snake 1,700 miles from Canada to the Gulf of Mexico have pinned their hopes on an unlikely ally _ the conservative state of Nebraska where opposition to Keystone XL pipeline has risen steadily since the project was proposed three years ago. Public hearings will start Sept. 27, in Lincoln on the 16-inch steel pipe that if built would carry oil extracted from tar sands in Alberta, Canada, through Montana, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas and Oklahoma to refineries in Texas. (Jeff McIntosh / THE CANADIAN PRESS) Alberta, U.S., oilsands, pressure Parliament hill protest oilsands

Photos

Ottawa, pipeline, protest

View Larger Image

Date: Mon. Sep. 26 2011 10:12 PM ET

Environmental activists planned a mass act of "civil disobedience" on Parliament Hill on Monday, but a potential standoff instead played out as a polite exchange between demonstrators and police.

The participants said they were willing to risk arrest as they protested against the Keystone XL pipeline extension, but the crowd of about 400 remained peaceful throughout the demonstration.

The issue, which centres on a planned pipeline that will send Alberta oil to refineries near the Gulf Coast in Texas, has been a controversial one in the U.S., attracting criticism from celebrities like Daryl Hannah.

But the "disobedience" in Ottawa amounted to no more than a number of protesters walking up to police barricades, climbing over a stepladder and immediately surrendering to officers.

About 400 people attended the protest, with 100 people being arrested for obstructing police officers, RCMP Sgt. Marc Menard said.

Those who crossed the police barricade were briefly retained with plastic cuffs and then set free after getting $65 fines.

According to Patrick Moore, a former leader of Greenpeace, the turnout shows that the vast majority of Canadians support the oilsands and recognize its importance for the country.

Moore, an ecologist who now operates a public relations company, told CTV News Channel from Vancouver that the Keystone project is the best way to get the oil down to the U.S.

"How else do we get the oil to Texas? Is there a better way? I don't think so," he said.

There has been criticism that the oil should be refined in Canada, but Moore noted that's not the best option. He said that refining the oil in Canada would mean building multiple pipelines to carry the products to the U.S. for export.

"You've got to get the oil where it's needed, and this is the best way to do it."

Moore added that First Nations communities are getting $800 million in contracts from the oilsands, and the industry is also reclaiming mining sites in an effort to return the area to forest.

He blamed the heightened rhetoric about the oilsands on "misinformation" from environmental groups.

"This is all going to be reclaimed, I have seen it all with my own eyes," he said.

Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver said the project will create "enormous" employment both in Canada and in the U.S.

When asked about criticisms that the oil should be refined in Canada, Oliver said that doing so would not be economically viable, since getting new refineries build would cost up to $20 billion.

"We don't have refinery capacity in Alberta, and it would take two new refineries to process the bitumen … at a cost of between 8 and 10 billion each," he told Power Play.

Earlier, hundreds of police were firmly in place before the demonstration began Monday, which was seen as a pre-emptive strategy against any large protests.

Police handed out flyers to protesters, which spelled out where the participants were allowed to roam, what their rights were and the duties that officers would be performing at the site.

Security appeared keen to avoid anything similar to the December 2009 incident where Greenpeace protesters managed to unfurl a banner from the parliament buildings.

Temporary fences were erected around the parliament buildings on Sunday night.

Environmentalists on both sides of the U.S.-Canada border have spoken out against the pipeline extension, which critics fear could cause a variety of environmental problems if it is constructed.

The Monday protest was expected to be one of the most public rebukes of the pipeline to date, following in the footsteps of another high-profile protest that took place outside the White House last month and involved more than 1,000 people.

However, the Ottawa protest remained tame, with many protesters climbing over a small barricade only to be politely arrested by police.

The rally in Ottawa was organized by Greenpeace and other groups that oppose the Keystone XL pipeline. Other groups involved include the Council of Canadians, the Indigenous Environmental Network and the Polaris Institute.

Liberal Leader Bob Rae made brief mention of the protest during question period in the House of Commons on Monday. Rae used one of his questions to attack the government's record on environmental policy.

Comments are now closed for this story

Katrina
said
0 0

It is one thing to judge the views of those protesting but it is another to condemn them on a personal level. To assume that everyone there were young, jobless hippies is unfair. Canadians of all walks traveled far to express their concerns. I don't think it is fair to judge them as anti Canadian. Everyone has a right to voice their concerns and it is my hope that Canadians from both sides understand what is on he line and make the decisions that they feel are best for our future.


Lisa in Calgary
said
0 0

Keystone will go through, the US State Department recognizes it is good for the US and our Conservative Government and majority of intelligent Canadians recognize the pipeline benefits not only Albertans, but the ‘have not’ provinces also, including Ontario. So cry all you want in Ottawa. Stop whining, get educated about pipelines and pipeline infrastructure and its benefits (jobs) and cease your poor attempts at creating ‘moral panic’; go find a real occupation and get yourself off the Green Peace payroll. If you’re so concerned about pipeline integrity perhaps you should concern yourself with existing ‘aging’ pipeline infrastructure and direct your focus and energy elsewhere. Yes, we’d be willing to shut off the tap for pipe running from the west to the east and allow the protestors the opportunity of educating themselves, from the ground up, so they can understand the industry is safe. Safety is your issue for protesting isn’t it? Or is it jobs? Or is it ‘dirty’ oil? Or do you really know what and why you’re protesting? New pipeline construction has far better integrity as new pipeline technologies are implemented. NOBODY wants oil spills anywhere, including those who engineer, manufacture and construct pipelines which is why there are so many checks and balances put into place. Get EDUCATED about the long term necessity of putting this project in place now. Who, if not Alberta’s wealth transfer from the Oil and Gas industry to the Federal government will assist the ‘have nots’ l generate the revenue needed in this country? Add that to your next protestor agenda.


Dee
said
0 0

My fear for all concerned is that if the pipeline goes through it will have a leakage problem much like the Alaska pipeline had for those stateside.


Prof. Pye Charrt
said
0 0

Ahem. I apologize for my rather unseemly behaviour in the past. I may appear at times to be a boorish, condescending individual, but I assure you I am a boorish, condescending conservative apologist armed with a dictrionary and thesaurus.


R Dean
said
0 0

Funny - a few days ago there was twice as many protesters on the hill against the abuse of native women. I didn't see the media going crazy over that? Why is this being hyped so much? Its fine that these people want to protest but why do these guys deserve such blanket coverage? Really - this isn't even count. 'Also known as dirty oil'. Ha ha. Anybody see that pesky little deep sea oil problem recently? Pipelines are not nearly as risky!


Jo-Anne
said
0 0

We protest because we see a bigger picture and what will happen if we allow the big$$$$ to rule our environment! If you don't live where these people live if you don't suffer the ailments and the loss of land and wildlife and all you are thinking about is lost jobs and how much cash that can be madefrom dirty oil. There is also money to be made in creating and becoming a leader in a market for sustainable energy. When you pull your heads out of the tar sands perhaps you will see what and why we are trying to stop the desicration of our land for the almighty $!!!!!


jim from ottawa
said
0 0

Talk about a bunch of whining, unrealistic, naive, tree hugging, anti business, and yes anti canadians activists. This troupe fit the bill totally. If my kid ever turned into something like that I'd take him or her out of the will.


ferdinand
said
0 0

@GoJetsGo: Thank you for your reasonable comments.


Bubba@Redcliff
said
0 0

I do not support this pipeline. Not for "environmental reasons" either.Why is our government not working towards having the refining capacity to refine this bitumen into diesel, gasoline, and other byproducts?Why should the jobs that such a refinery complex bring be "gifted" to the US, and then having the US sell our resource sold BACK to us, at a premium?It must be nice though, to have all that free time, to go to Ottawa, Calgary, etc to "protest."Having a job means that I don't make it to such protests-too busy earning money that the government taxes, to give to these morons as welfare/unemployment etc payments.


ferdinand
said
0 0

Ah, yes, stupidity once again reigns supreme on the boards. "I'm a nose-pickin' taxpayer working so hard to buy my giant pickup truck"! Does anyone have any ability to understand the science behind their protests?


brad
said
0 0

why are people not protesting the skyrocketing cost of food?


Maureen Alberta
said
0 0

Unless every protester walked naked to the venue of their choice, they're a hypocrite. Petroleum products are in the clothes you wear, the energy used to light, heat and cool your home and work place. The keystone pipeline is the "cause of the week" soon everybody will be concentrating on something else.


Big A
said
0 0

Civil disobedience -- !! isn't that the death penalty???


Diane
said
0 0

The point of a protest is not to WIN or "outlast the police". The point of a protest is simply to protest a policy or action or, in this case, a proposed action. My compliments for those that participated peacefully. You have taken the time to participate in Canadian democracy and, regardless of mine or anyone's views on the subject, you should be proud.


LORRAINE
said
0 0

@pye chart - keep your comments coming. You sound like an incredibly educated person and you make sense. I look forward to what you have to say and missed you when you were absent for a while.


margra03
said
0 0

I will defend with my life the right of any Canadian lawfully protesting any government decision that may not be in the best interest of the country. NOTE: CANADIAN! not these professional foreign protesters that come to my country to raise havoc. These scum should be either jailed or deported as unwanted and never allowed into my country again!


Prof. Pye Chartt
said
0 0

@ Listen to the Protesters!: So, let me get this straight... You're siding with the protesters, you're up in arms about a pipeline into the U.S. that hasn't even been built yet, you're frothing at the mouth over the Conservative government, supposedly, not doing enough to rid us of our oil dependence (as if it were realistically and/or legislatively possible based upon a whole bunch of dandy alternatives parked under our nose), and WE are the "disgruntled" ones? Okay. Thanks. (Perhaps taking a break now would help you organize your thoughts...or at least allow your blistered keyboard fingers to heal.)


WD. Calgary
said
0 0

What is the big deal! Protesting pipelines for 'environmental' reasons. There are hundreds of thousands of miles of pipelines all over North America. They have a proven safety record. People actually go to school to work in 'environmental technology' and if these so called environmental protestors actually had an education that was based in science, they too could be real environmentals working towards solving problems. Then again they may not have time to protest. Just a note, there has been two very extensive reports done on the Keystone Pipeline Project and the real environmental scientists have given it the go ahead. Someone please direct the CBC to this website so they can see what the majority of Canadians have to say!


Chris
said
0 0

This is to Listen to the Protesters". The term "liberal" doesn't necessarily mean a political party supporter you know. I call liberals left wingers because that's what they are!!! But to smite your posts regarding this topic, I don't listen to protesters... I LISTEN TO FACTS!!! Fact: The pipeline will supply millions of barrels for export. Fact: The funds will be a great source of income for the country, thus providing BETTER services for left wingers to be happy about. Fact: The land that was once filled with oil is blooming beautiful landscape. What are your facts? Let me know, thank you.


Alan
said
0 0

Risking arrest haha,,,,,, a $65 ticket, payable to the city of Ottawa for trespassing. What a gig. It must have been a field trip fpr Carleton students. I wonder what our security expenses were. They were out in an hour and probably went back to do it over.I guess their numbers were down because some had to be in Vancouver to protest Cheney's visit. Sorry for the sarcasm but I believe Greenpeace comes up short in their alternatives.


robin hood
said
0 0

Re: Biodiesel although it has been promoted mostly as a fuel for diesel-powered vehicles, biodiesel is perfectly suited as an additive or replacement fuel in a standard oil-fired furnace or boiler. http://www.biodiesel.org/resources/biodiesel_basics/Hemp oil equals biodiesel, reliable, cost effective, reusable, sustainable heating source, an alternative that works. It is tasteless, clear, eatable, and has a nutty aroma, sounds like something straight out of heaven’s labs. How about we back the farmer, and build city wide greenhouses, shop locally, and build a sustainable infrastructure by investing in ourselves. Our excess can then be traded, bartered with our trading partners in exchange for their excesses, once the people are provided for. Oh, I don’t know; a loaf of bread and fish come to mind. No, I’m not religious but I do believe in magic and wait for it… Santa Claus! Every Country has something to bring to the table—whether it is a resource, a product, or a specific talent etc. Thus we all have a currency worthy of negotiations to feed a sustainable global existence. We have the resources. We have the land and we have the knowhow. We have the will! We know how to identify and utilize what we have on hand and can provide all basic needs to all our people. I’m a citizen born, mostly raised, (minus the 2and a half years in Germany) in this country, I want scratch that I need to know why our government feels that stripping us of our livelihoods our rights and freedoms is somehow a vehicle, a catalyst that will open up the path that will create jobs and an thriving economy? Tell me, in theory, how many people did I just give a livelihood to in the above paragraphs? Theory becomes reality when you act on it! I want eye to eye contact with anyone who wants my support to shelter me. My question is; explain to me why Canada, rich, with so much to offer us all and this world is set on a path of death, rape, pillage, and plunder? I need to know Harper— RSVP.


WhiteOut
said
0 0

@Catwoman39

While your dedication to your cause is admirable, you need to be up to date on your facts. The Keystone XL is only PROPOSED, there is no pipe in place and not product is flowing at this time. As for it not being well thought out; are you an accredited engineer or professional employed by the industry? What is you factual basis for your claims of improper design and ongoing leakage?


redss
said
0 0

100% against the protesters, 100% in favour of pipeline. lump it libs go whine about something else, or how about getting a job, and stop feeding off taxpayers.


Get a Life - Ottawa
said
0 0

Wow do these people not work or go to school..where do they find the time to protest..or are each and everyone getting some benefit from the Government...maybe get a job "working on the pipeline"


CDN OIL
said
0 0

Subject: Canada's Oil Sands & other energy exports Please let me be clear, I hate the oil sands & its impact on the environment etc... BUT... As long as Canadians use & need oil?, I feel Canada & Canadians should come first?, not the USA & China. All the Americans talk about is energy security & independence, why don't we?... "Canada imports more than half of the crude oil it needs. We purchase around 55 per cent of our oil from countries such as Algeria, Saudi Arabia and Venezuela. We are also turning increasingly toward new sources including Russian and African producers."-Canadians.org. And yet we cant pipe it out of Canada past Canadians fast enough?, only to import our own from dictators etc?, ZERO mention of our own energy security &/or independence, why?... Something smells? & its not just the oil sands...


option B
said
0 0

It's simple really. Drop everything that you're doing, build a house in the country, farm and hunt in the summer and hunt in the winter. stay warm through the cold months with a good ol' fashioned woodfire. Then forget everything you know about modern life. It's either that or y'all can keep it up and run our earth into destruction.


Listen to the Protesters!
said
0 0

You question whether or not I support "Safe" nuclear energy? YES I do! You question whether or not I support expensive measures to overcome our fossil fuel problem and am I willing to pay the cost? YES - without apprehension. Go then, and build your pipelines so that you don't suffer, after all, it's all about YOU isn't it? You disgruntled individual's who can't see past the wallets held up against your noses need to give your heads a shake... really. The reasoning you've offered me here in this forum is nothing short of self-centred and out of touch with reality! What an embarassing lot of ignorance!


Gary Durksen
said
0 0

Apparently these protesters have nothing better to do, better than having to work I guess. I sure hope they didnt drive away from the protest using vehicals powered by that evil oil and gas. They must have used horse and buggy right? or walked home lol


Greg
said
0 0

@small number?! hahahaha a MASSIVE crowd?? a massive crowd is not a few thousand people...there is that many people on parliament hill everyday!


Gabby
said
0 0

I also just got home from the protests. In my view, they went quite well. Over 200 people crossed the fence- so many in fact that the police were not actually able to even charge them all. Those that were charged were given a tiny, tiny slap on the wrist. In other words, WE WON! We outlasted the police. And the amount of media coverage we got means that the politicians up on the hill couldn't and didn't ignore us, To whoever in this thread said "I think our governments - of whatever stripe - would pay a lot more attention to a peaceful and reasoned gathering of people committed to a different vision, a different plan." You should have been there today. That's exactly what this was. A peaceful, but impassioned, gathering, with folks trying to bring a message to the Canadian government, and the people in power refusing to listen. It was not "thug-based or intimidating." People from many walks of life participated: indigenous peoples, elderly, youth, members of unions. Public opinion in Canada is actually quite against the tar sands. And you're wrong about civil disobedience not being effective. Every great system change in the history of the world has been achieved with the aid of civil disobedience- look at this past year, with the Arab Spring. I hope that today helps launch a movement that puts an end to tar sands development. I am nothing but hopeful.


GoJetsGo
said
0 0

Well I must say that I don't know enough about the pros and cons about this pipeline enough to want to take a position on it. I do my part for the environment and would like to know a little more about alternative energy. I can tell you that this isn't the only protest that has happened on Canadian soil and it does frankly bother me that people are mocking this one. If a serial murderer was being set free, if the government decides to implement a new tax or decides to close down a senior citizen's home - if it was your child murdered or your taxes being increased or your grandmother out on the street, I'm sure any one of us would protest. I'm off of work now but I also find it funny how people make accusations that these protestors aren't at work - are you really working as well if you've posted your 2 cents worth on this site. We live in a free country and let's all do our research on this topic so we can be smart about it and not ignorant throwing around stupid comments - that goes for BOTH sides.


tony k
said
0 0

To the protestors of the proposed keystone xl pipeline & the tar-sands. You enjoy the benefits of everything that comes from oil & petroleum related products (as we all do!) which are too numerous to mention. SO! With that being said please stop being hypocrites!!!


Listen to the protesters
said
0 0

@ All ears: I agree that you're "all ears" on this one since there's not much to indicate much "in-between" with your response. I've read my postings over and over again, and your unfounded accusation that I'm a Liberal only goes to serve how you Conservative right wingers think that Canadians are only entitled to one of three political party opinions. Re-read what I've said, and then, think about it after you get all heated up, go have a cup of oil as a refresher, and get back to me in the morning. And as for Liberlas fading into Oblivion... go back to the 1993 election and explain what happened then. Thanks!


Henry Wysmulek
said
0 0

If they like arab oil so much, then why don't they move to the opec countries and try their demonstrations there?




Ron
said
0 0

I rather use the so called "dirty oil" from Alberta than the "conflict oil" from the middle east.


Doug from Alberta
said
0 0

Shut off the cameras and see how long these self serving fools stick around to protest. They're nothing more than immature attention seekers. Why aren't they offering meaningful and viable alternatives rather than wasting police time, smiling and posing, as they're led away. Real working people, paying their own way, haven't got time to travel and protest.


Paul
said
0 0

The oilsands are trully a dispicable disgusting mark on Canada. It's only a matter of time before the world teaches Canada a lesson and brings her down to her knees. The US is not that crazy about the oilsands either. With enough pressure, the lobbist could influence the public and private sector of the dangers these oilsands are having on the environment and the people.


John Lethbridge
said
0 0

We want the pipeline. Much safer to pipe crude oil than to pipe gasoline. If you are so sure that these companies are going to make so much money off of this, then invest in these companies... The environmental risks for the pipeline are manageable, particularly when pitted against offshore resources. If you are smart and care so much about the evironment, focus on risk management instead of wasting your time trying to oppose the deal. We want the pipe. Where do we sign up to support the pipe?


marcelg
said
0 0

The protest is about the environment once again. Get over it people. They should protest the fact that we are sending the oil to the US instead of refining it here for our use and provide us with cheaper gas. The US will refine our oil and sell it back to us. Imagine if we kept our oil here in CANADA, we would actually pay under a dollar once again but hey, I can dream can't I?


N in AB
said
0 0

So they take contaminated sand, remove the contaminants (oil) and then put it back, minus the harmful contaminants ............ and thats a bad thing ? Whatever, I hope the oil companies put a month long freeze on oil and gas production. Just stop EVERYTHING, then we will see what the world would be like w/o fossil fuels.


Jayme
said
0 0

Small number
Sorry to break it to you but 2.000 is a very small number and it does show they don't have much support.


Prof. Pye Chartt
said
0 0

@ Listen to the protesters!: What evidential proof do you have, could you possibly have, that the pipeline in question (a PROPOSED project) is, in fact, "dangerous" and thus, unworthy of approval, as you sycophantically assert?! Kindly share with us your specific, up-to-date technical, engineering, safety, and monitoring knowledge. Thanks.


EthicalEarl
said
0 0

Perhaps they could apply for jobs, once they cross. They are obviously in need of one.


Catwoman 39
said
0 0

I was at the rally , and there was well over 1000 people there, and over 200 were climbing over the fence. The pipeline is not very well thought out, and it already has had 14 small leaks.


seventhson
said
0 0

The protesting participants range from the Uninformed to the Completely Clueless. The trouble is, these people for the most part are blind followers of organizations such as Green Peace, who, by the way are opposed to all forms of energy....including Oil, Natural Gas, Nuclear Energy.... all adding up to over 98% of the energy used to fuel our way of life. If Green Peace has their way, we will all be living in caves, hunting for roots and berries in competition with bears and squirrels. They offer no viable alternatives to replace all that missing energy. Wind and Solar can not even begin to replace Oil and Natural Gas.....wind and solar technology is at least 25 years away. C'mon all those who disagree with me.....what are your solutions.... whining and wailing will not do as a response....only real solutions.


Keith in Calgary
said
0 0

JD, Ottawa - So you are confident that the protestors have excellent information on the complete process of extraction of oil from the oilsands and all of its consequences, as opposed to reading a couple of websites and listening to a couple of talks here and there (as many albeit not all) do? Quite often those who protest in this fashion don't have a comprehensive understanding of the very issue they are talking about. I have done work in the oilsands for the last 10 years and have been exposed to many of the reclamation and water management processes. Are there things that can be improved on? Absolutely! Are there things that the companies don't get credit for? Also affirmative. For example many sites require extensive paperwork and immediate cleanup if for example a truck leaks a little oil (less than 1L) in a parking lot. It is taken very seriously. Get out from under your rock. You are coming off as the stupid one in this case.


tc
said
0 0

@listen to the protesters - you are so off base on your perceived logic that you are trying to use. As well your comments reveal that your not so much against anything to do with fossil fuels as much as your against the current Canadian government. You criticize the conservatives of not doing anything for alternative energy sources but why not criticize the previous liberal government as well. You also comment that oilbased products are what the Right wingers live off. So what do you use? do you grow your own food, all without use of any oilbased products or materials? do you make your own furniture, clothing and everything else you use without using oilbased products or energy? I doubt it.


Small number?!
said
0 0

I was there this morning. Just want to point out that there were nearly 200 people who crossed the fence...hardly a small number.
And you'd never know it from CTVs pictures, but there was a massive crowd...well over 1000.


Paul - Waterloo
said
0 0

Right off, let me say that I don't have a problem with extracting oil from the oil sands. I would prefer that we have alternative, cleaner, hopefully renewable, energy resources; but until we do, I would prefer that we extract Canadian oil, refine it at Canadian refineries, and sell our excess to the highest bidder. The Obama jobs bill makes it clear that it sees its duty to the US worker/economy first, which is pretty understandable; we need a similar commitment to our own workers & economy.Where I have a problem is in the nature of the planned protests. Everybody has the right to protest something that they believe is wrong, and I would never want to take that away. BUT: why do these fools PLAN to break the law as part of their protests. Every one of them who breaks the law should be thrown in jail, and every one of their leaders should further be charged with inciting unlawful acts, and whatever else the prosecuting attorneys can come up with. These lawless, thug-dominated, intimidating protests must stop. I think our governments - of whatever stripe - would pay a lot more attention to a peaceful and reasoned gathering of people committed to a different vision, a different plan. All this bullying/law breaking accomplishes is to set the government, and many people who previously were unsure of the issues, to dig in their heels and say 'no', not necessarily because they disagree with the idea, but because they refuse to give in to bullying tactics.SMARTEN UP, PEOPLE! We don't have to put up with this nonsense. Write to your MP, and MPP, and insist that lawbreakers be dealt with speedily and in full accord with the law of the land!


Disgusted with journalism
said
0 0

There's no argument that the oil sands and accompanying things like pipelines do some initial environmental destruction: You can't dig a hole without it. But current coverage is a slap in the face to my many friends who are experts in land reclamation. I just went through the CTV photo profile fo the oil sands. Come on! Dozens of "pit" pictures but not a single one of the reclaimed areas? This province has lots of beautiful areas with good soil that were once industrial sites. Are we going far enough? Not yet but we likely can and at the very least this should be touched on in the so-called balanced coverage media outlets provide.


Zroo
said
0 0

People, we need a new tack then Protesting or Unions!!! Bottom line is the powers to be have figured out how to shut you down and turn the public against you! Please come up with something new, public protests are a thing of the past and now controlled by government and police. Just like this country, it's evolved, we're not in the 60s anymore and neither are our laws or government!!! They know how to control this and make you look bad. Just look at what the media is doing by posting the picture above this articular. I'm worried that this will start a civil war if we don't come to common grounds and stop being so UNDIVIDED. Protesting and all the past ways of doing things NEED TO CHANGE!!! it needs to get peoples attention just like Harper's Govement did May 2nd!!


Khaled Adams
said
0 0

FYI I'm lazy and I only read the short comments.
:)


Marc
said
0 0

Notice they're mostly all under the age of 25? You know, the age where you're still stupid and have no idea how the world works?


Piece of Pie
said
0 0

This just in.....the World Health Organization has indicated that Canada has the third best air quality in the world. Wow! Those protestors in Ottawa today have made that much of a difference already? If it weren't for all that "Dirty Oil" we would probably have the best air quality.


George Carter
said
0 0

Sorry...but these pictures really are fun to look at. One with a protester triumphantly thrusting her fist in the air...for what? Getting arrested? I hope she understands that she doesn't get to make a statement...an unsolicited statement will only result in contempt charges, more jail, and another fine. Right now she gets booked, and processed and then appears before the magistrate and fined, time served...NEXT!!!


Amanda
said
0 0

I went to the protest today. It is my democratic right to disagree with my governments policies. Pick up a Grade 10 Civics textbook, you'll see a whole chapter on protesting and civil disobedience and how active citizenship is a Canadian Value.
The protest was well organized, with many political leaders and representatives from the local communities affected by the tar sands (Oil sands is a term created by the Canadian Government in a P.R. move)
The issues discussed covered the economy, water, land rights, energy solutions, and the health of future generations. These people were very informed and passionate about the cause. They have nothing to gain except a healthier future for us all.
I have a job, I use oil products - but I limit that use as much as I can. I also care and support other causes, but today was a protest concerning the pipeline. I do not support a pipeline that will travel through environmentally and socially important land. Where do you think our water comes from? I do not support a pipeline that will enable the government to sell our resources for a cheap short term profit while sending jobs south. The existing Keystone pipeline from Transcanada has already had 12 oil leaks since last June. Would anyone invest in a vehicle that had 12 serious oil leaks in one year?
Some people need to actually read the facts, and look up the information themselves and not rely on oil and gas industry funded FALLACIES like "Ethical Oil". Read other news sites besides those provided by Postmedia. The same companies that operate in Saudi Arabia etc, operate in Alberta. It's all the same corporate players.
The Earth is a system, we all need it to live, however,we don't need oil to live.




Mark in Newmarket
said
0 0

What I find quite funny is that I bet most of these protestors who are there are all driving around in gas guzzlers.


George Carter
said
0 0

I laughed until I cried...The protesters are making a statement by climbing over the perimeter fences and in the one picture...there is Joe Mountie helping the guy across so's he doesn't hurt himself..."Police brutality! POLICE BRUTALITY!!!" LOL


All ears
said
0 0

@Listen to the protesters!: It wasn't until I got through two thirds of your anti pie-chart post that your anti anything-conservative stance started to shine and it's a typical liberal head-buried-in-the-sand babble to suggest that we are only partially dependent on oil. Perhaps I understand pie-charts obvious delight in attacking the the anti Harper crowd, because you make it so easy! Have you tried to imagine your life without oil? Go ahead and you'll find that almost everything you use or consume depended on oil as part of it's processing. The Liberals have faded into oblion, because they simply don't have a firm grasp of reality.


Back to the Future
said
0 0

Scrap it all. Everyone back to living in the bush. Send the tree huggers in first. I don't see them moving into communes or buying acreage to live on. They'd starve to death believing that every crawling species was sacred.


anon
said
0 0

What is with this build the refinery here nonsense. There are rows of refineries in Houston where the end point is. The pipeline distribution center for the US is there. They are going to take our oil but moth ball the refineries? Not likely! Instead the rocket surgeons protestors would have you believe we can refine it all here. Whose going to put up the Billions upon Billions in cash required? The Council of Canadians? Greenpeace (whoops they just might have the money)? Just because you grow grain doesn't mean you own a bakery!


Dave
said
0 0

I wonder how many of the protestors have jobs or are studying philosophy and ancient religions??


Phillip Martin
said
0 0

Its a pity that any protestors who are allowed to exercise tgheir democratic rights then spoil it all by outright lies and distortions to make their points:
*Cancers everywhere.....BS
*Communities destroyed..BS
*Billion of water used..BS
*Natives poisoned.......BS
The facts are that Natives all work in the oilsands making very good money like everybody else. 3 are millionaires. 335,000 people feed their families across Canada courtesy the oilsands. FACT. HEalthiest air in Canada. Come see it and believe. We welcome everybody from across the WORLD.


P Jackson
said
0 0

JD Ottawa the comment you attacked is not stupid it is very valid. The disinformation campaign that the enviro facists are disseminating causes economic impact to all of us and is deliberately misleading in order to stir emmotions to bring in donations from suckers.


rudy solis
said
0 0

I wonder if these protesters walked or did they DRIVE to the demonstration!


Brent
said
0 0

It must be nice to be either a high school or university drop out, or a graduate with a unemployable degree, because no one with a real job, paying off a mortgage or a car loan can afford to attend such a protest as this.

The only thing I protest is the shipping of Alberta's bitumen to the USA for processing. Build the refineries here and charge the Yanks an arm and a leg for the refined product.


Tie
said
0 0

Environmentally this cannot be good, but from what I gathered about the oil sands in Alberta is that it’s more cost effective to have someone else to the hard labor work and to buy it back then it is to do the work ourselves.


jane
said
0 0

Keep the oil in Canada - sure! Build the refineries here - sure! Where the heck are you going to build them??!! Everyone screams build them here but if it's probposed within 100 miles of their home - forget about it! Then they scream build it somewhere else!! Build the refineries here and see what kind of temper tantrum Greenpeace throws then.


Listen to the protesters!
said
0 0

@ Rob western Canadian: I would hanker a guess that these protestors aren't able to take on every concern on behalf of people like you without diminishing the value of their work on this important cause. Perhaps if the annual fish kill in PEI is keeping you awake at night then do something about it yourself. These people aren't protesting to eliminate fossil fuels overnight (you've been reading too much of Pye Chartt's nonsense again haven't you?). They're protesting yet another dangerous pipeline that's being built when the refining of this oil could be done more safely and with more concern to the environment. We do need to take a proactive approach to finding alternative energy sources (like it or not) and pumping that sludge you Albertans drink with dinner to the US to fund the creation of jobs there is taking this ridiculous project to the completely ridiculous level of ridiculous. Oh, and btw, homes out east here are also heated by electricity which can be obtained through solar farms and wind turbines. Some homes can be heated from the dead wood we collect from our forests as well. Some of us can even keep warm by cuddling up together to even cut our energy usage further through those long cold nights. Sorry to hear about your dependency on the black goo you're finding in your sand. You Albertans might want to find something else to line your pockets... really!


rjhawkes
said
0 0

I support the co-founder of greenpeace when he supports the tarsands and rebukes greenpeace as an organization that is off the rails on the tarsands.....and he's been there to visit.


Carl
said
0 0

If you're going to protest something, you should at least be able to suggest an alternative to the thing you are protesting. So what alternative are these people proposing? Do they want to stop using oil altogether and go hungry and cold in the dark? Or do they want to continue making middle eastern terrorists, radicals, murderers and woman-haters incredibly rich?


Redneck Albertan
said
0 0

Must be nice to spend a work day protesting something beneficial to all of us working stiffs. Listen, all those against "dirty" oil; Instead of whining and complaining about something which will likely never affect you in any negative way, why don't you put the same energy into coming up with a PRACTICAL ALTERNATIVE to oil? That pipeline is going to get built. The trick to getting your way is to have viable options. If there are no options, you must do whatever it takes to keep the economy going until those solutions come to fruition. Moaning about this and that provides nothing without presenting a way around the problem.


Proud Albertan
said
0 0

Ok i want to know why these guys are actually opposed to the pipeline and what they would suggest for an alternative! How much fuel do you think is spent transporting all the oil from the Middle East to here on those massive oil tankers? Not to mention its anything but a reliable and stable source of oil. Canada just makes sense! The US needs oil and we have oil just common sense that these hippies don’t seem to posses


maggie
said
0 0

I will defend the right to protest ....peacefullyI will not defend you if you enter into the Parliament Buildings to expound on your issues... we have elected officials to do that...BUT before you make your rants make sure you get the facts... not emotion..in this instance a heck of a lot of money comes from the oil industry ... which pays for our health care - pays for our educational institutions, pays for our roads because personal income tax alone does not cover much in the grand scheme of things... the issue that needs to be address is to find cleaner - safer ways of using - processing products such as oil, coal etc... and... as an aside... to all the tree huggers out there ... think of everything in your home and see how much IS or is not made of an oil product !


Maggie McNaught
said
0 0

Just wondering.....how did the protesters arrive in Ottawa. I'm assuming they did not use their two legs. Surely they must have driven by vehicle, took a bus, a train, a plane - all of which requires that dirty, dirty, gas, oil etc. Be careful, never bit the hand that feeds you! Oh and by the way, I'll bet they were also drinking bottled water. How do they suppose those water bottles are made? Perhaps, these protesters should start watching the Discovery Channel - on "How it's Made". Very enlightening to be sure.


ShaneC
said
0 0

This is a bad for Canadian workers idea. We should stop selling crude oil and refine it here in Canada.Gas sells for more. It would create jobs, lots of them. If this goes thru the Conservatives are (I hope) going to pay in the next election. (I voted for them but not again if they screw Canadians on this)


John in Edmoonton
said
0 0

What a bunch of retards! if these people have time to protest a pipeline then they must not have jobs or they'd be at work. They should be applauding the possibility of jobs not trying to stop them. These people really have no clue as to what goes on in the world. Open your eyes you idiots, so now you'll tie up the courts with all your charges that will be levied against you and cost the tax payer even more dollars. If i wasnt busy earning a living I'd go out there and kick the crap out of every one of you losers.


JIM - CGY
said
0 0

Funny How STUPID gets my attention, it just never seems to keep it.

What Protest, who were them protesters anyway. did they walk all the way here to Canada, or was it a Group on bikes. (Used Gasoline Vehicles (what???), well I never!!!)

Anyway, news is you all peddling back to the USA, I would love to follow that story. Until then, this is just BORING !


joe canada
said
0 0

I wonder how long it would take, if we were to turn the taps of oil off to the states, before they would send in their tanks and planes to "protect our democracy"? diversifying is the best thing for canada.


Prof. Pye Chartt
said
0 0

@ Listen to the protesters!: Your follow-up diatribe, topped with its questions that you yourself cannot answer, made clear that you're proficient at emptily criticizing this Conservative government, not providing specific, workable solutions. I'm disappointed (but not surprised). If not windmills and solar panels, what's YOUR "answer"?! Are you a supporter of nuclear energy, as I and several members of this government are? I think we should be moving in that direction (tackling the obvious safety issues head-on) for, unlike the aforementioned sources of power, nuclear can actually fill the fossil-fuel void. Rather than fearfully abandon it, we should be scientifically pursuing its advancement for safe and reliable future use. Commit the time and resources. With regard to refining oil domestically, clearly, you don't grasp who owns and controls our resources, and why it is entirely appropriate to pipe it to the U.S. in this circumstance. What's precluding Canadian companies from building domestic refineries? Why does our federal government need to be orchestrating or undertaking that "obvious" business? If there's profit, there's a will, and there's certainly a way. Money can always be raised. Perhaps spending less time throwing molasses at Harper & Company and more time providing concrete suggestions that account for the encompassing realities would be more constructive (and less frustrating) for you. Thanks.


George Carter
said
0 0

@ listen to the protesters --- You argument would hold more water (good ol' Canadian mountain fresh water) if "alternatives" such as you mentioned were more affordable. As it stands, you know those "Smart" cars??? Do some research and see how much it costs to replace the rechargeable electric battery in those...


gordon
said
0 0

MPl - I suspect that most police officers are well enough educated to know how "isn't" is spelled...


Terry Clarke
said
0 0

I agree with the protesters keep our oil in CANADA build refineries and make jobs for Canadians..don't ship anything over our borders without adding value from Canadian workers


Paul
said
0 0

Question for the protesters. Where is a place which you can get 'clean' oil? Its sure not the Middle East for example.


Jamie
said
0 0

How come nobody ever protests using oil from the middle eastern companies that support terrorism, and force women into second class citizens? We need oil, and at least the oil sands is working towards being more environmentally sound (while it can be argued the current effectiveness of those efforts, most would agree they are further ahead than where they were 5 or 10 years ago). While the environment concerns me, I'd feel better if we weren't supporting the gross extravagance overseas and their sub buck a gallon gas, while they funnel money to terrorist activities. Were we to start depending more on our oil at home, and stop supporting them overseas, not only would our cost of living go down, but more money could go into improving exploration technologies, and less money to supporting terrorism.


oddmelee
said
0 0

I agree with the prosters keep our oil in CANADA build refineries and make jobs for Canadians--we do not need oil from anywhere else


MLp
said
0 0

I'm getting tired of the police gangs we see more and more frequently. I suspect that the numbers are to protect themselves. Since when was policing safe anyways.. is'nt that why we pay them good money? It certainly is'nt for their education.


Listen to the protesters!
said
0 0

Oh Pye Chartt, One day your two cents worth will actually be worth the two cents you've invested. Your assumption that those who are protesting this oil pipeline engage in the "full" utilization of the product's forms is probably as weak on it's foundation as most of your other attacks on posters. Of course we are surrounded by oil products. Show me alternatives that are going to be developed without the support of research to see that it is so. I highly doubt that these anti-oil protestors are unlike myself in that they do understand a need for "some" oil products, but that we also can't be as blind as people like you and not pursue alternatives to its use whenever and wherever possible. Certainly the fossil fuels are a critical "piece" of "some" parts of our lives, but not at all as encompassing as your rant would have us believe. And who said anything about a swift movement to wind, solar and other alternative energy source research? You. Just you. Perhaps you could enlighten us as to the record of the Conservative government to take us towards alternative sources of energy at a pace that's in tune with the requirements of the environment and a growing percentage of Canadians? Explain for us why it is we are unable to build refineries here to eliminate the need for such a pipeline project and create "Canadian" jobs. Explain for us why more money can't be invested into alternative energy sources as opposed to oil and gas research please. And You talk of childish delusion. Given the substance of your attack, you appear well informed on the subject through your own immature mindset.


JD, Ottawa
said
0 0

keith in calgary "I wonder how many of these protestors have actually been to the oilsands or have actually seen how pollution, water managment and reclamation activities are conducted. Probably not too many." -- I've also never been to the moon. But the reports are pretty thorough. Your comment is stupid.


J.C.
said
0 0

Personally I would prefer we use solar power and expand on that rather than all these other means. However it will be a ways off before that would be completely viable. In the mean time I have to agree with those that say we should have our own refineries in this country. I also note that most of these oil companies are not Canadian owned which I find sad, as it is our resource! This might also explain why they do not build refineries here as they figure that way they can gouge us more for the fuel and make more money off of us. I also do not really agree with Oil being taken from the ocean. On land it is more containable should there be a spill. Just my thoughts on this subject.


Rob western Canadian
said
0 0

And why are these protesters not protesting the annual fish kill in PEI every year. Thanks to the pesticides and everything else the potato farmers are spraying onto their crops. Maybe Alberta should just turn off the taps and see how long these protesters last this winter when it drops down to minus 25 and they have to walk to work, and there is no heat to keep them warm!


Justin M.
said
0 0

Just another example of the polarization of western politics. How is anybody supposed to meet in the middle and affect real change when no one is speaking to each other? Why is no one talking about unmetered consumption of water by the oil and gas sector in Alberta? Because the left is too busy trying to get laid, covering their bodies in paint, and laying around government centers. There are huge gains to be made in the right direction, if Greenpeace and these misguided protesters would stop diluting the issue with one useless clown show after another.


PBW
said
0 0

While I disagree with the reason for this protest I must support their right to do so. However, they must police themselves and keep the demonstration absolutely peaceful. Unfortunately, there are those in this nation who will go to the demonstration simply to turn it into a mob riot. We've seen it before at G8 and G20 meetings, not to mention Vancouver's Stanley Cup debacle. Why should anyone stand by and allow a violent minority to take over a valid peaceful protest? Just look out for those protesters in hoodies or ski masks! As for "celebrities" being involved, perhaps they should actually educate themselves about the issue, rather than just parroting what extremist groups like Greenpeace tell them. . . but then, maybe they aren't capable of independent thought, being used to following a script and doing what they are told on set.


ColinR
said
0 0

"We have to take it up a notch," Billings told The Canadian Press on Monday. "It's all going to be peaceful. Our side will be non-violent." This statement is just pure hypocrisy. How can they notch up a protest from non-violence to.. non-violence? It just doesn't make sense. Arrests will be made. Protestors will claim innocence. Police will be called out for brutality. Let's just mark his words now, though. They want to escalate this.


T. Hull
said
0 0

I am deliberately quoting out of context, but I had to smile when Mike-Lloyd asks "...is it just fashionable to spout off without much thought...?" Of course it is! You just have to read the comment section regularly to know this.


To Sam America
said
0 0

Relax a bit okay? Just because Joe Canada is giving you some grief - it doesn't mean we are all the same. Any Canadian who knows anything about the economy and markets, know that we rely on America as a trading partner. But we are two different countries, and to our credit, we have been able to avoid some of the issues that are plaguing your country. America does have a lot of wealth and power, but it doesn't mean that you guys can't learn something from us up North either. I know that might seem a bit out there for you guys - learning form the little people. But I think we know a thing or two about economics given our situation, you might want to a take cue from us.


Prof. Pye Chartt
said
0 0

@ Listen to the Protesters!: Nice rant. However, it fell apart at the beginning, the moment you asserted that fossil fuels are the "lifeblood of right-wingers." What intellectual "immaturity" on your part. Why is it silly to question those who claim that oil is somehow an evil commodity while they engage in the full utilization of the product's forms, right down to their computer. Isn't their hypocrisy merely serving to underscore the practical point of most sane individuals, that fossil fuels are a critical part of our lives at this point, and only complete fools believe (politically and scientifically) that our society can swiftly replace oil with power-insufficient and visually polluting windmills and solar panels? While I agree that some on the right are blissfully ignorant when it comes to the environment, I must argue that too many folks on the left are childishly delusional when it comes to North American energy requirements. Thanks.


gord
said
0 0

If they don't want the pipeline in the states use an existing pipeline and send it to Sarnia where we can employ Canadians and produce cheaper fuel for Canadians... too simple


Michael from the real world
said
0 0

URU--so, you think these dilettantes possess a permit to gather for their protest? If not, then it will be an act of civil disobedience. Simple, non? As for tax-paying citizens, who says these protestors are employed? [e.g. and then pay taxes] I would also venture that you have no idea what a totalitarian regime is [if you really think we Canadians live in one] Those who really do live in a totalitarian regime pay for demonstrations with their lives [e.g. Syria]


keith in calgary
said
0 0

I wonder how many of these protestors have actually been to the oilsands or have actually seen how pollution, water managment and reclamation activities are conducted. Probably not too many.


shawn
said
0 0

Why are you even bothering to protest? Not once has public protest affected anything that governemnt had done. The goverment is looking out the window laughing at you all! If you want to stop the pipeline... you have to be more creative!


Brad
said
0 0

OIL - One simple question, with so much oil why are we not getting it for 40 cents a litre? Oh that's right all the oil companies are paying off the governments SIMPLE-GAME PEOPLE PLAY False supply and demand.. speculation = greed


JB in Ontario
said
0 0

We as Canadians have a fundamental right to protest this future ecological disaster! Just say "no" to the KeystoneXL pipeline. We will not be bullied by the United States who wants our oil.


GHW
said
0 0

Its not unusual to have misguided protesters for projects like this but all they are doing is adding to the overall costs that will ultimately come out of our wallets. Get a job! Left leaning east based media love stories that stick it to the west. I say we build refineries in Ontario and Quebec and pipe the unrefined oil there. This would offer all kinds of great benefits for Canada. Unfortunately much of the investment for extraction comes from big American oil companies who have a lot of control over the entire process. Oil Sands Rock!


Mireille
said
0 0

I think the added security around the parliament is improper. Shouldn't the security used by politicians be of better use for the environment? We use and abuse our beautiful country and all of it's wildness. We should be more careful with it for even though it is big, it is still fragile. I believe politicians should all show interest in their country's wilderness, no matter what their party, and create more laws to protect it. The protesters have a right and are right to demonstrate their concern for OUR canadian wilderness. This should not be treated as an act of civil desobediance; it is an act of concern which politicians don't seem to have.


seventhson
said
0 0

Right now we see the Obama administration in the USA and the McGuinty administration here in Ontario, spending obscene amounts of money that they don't have on green energy proposals that are simply not viable in the long term and of course.... not affordable in the short term. I really believe that common sense and reason have permanently left the stable. I really worry about the retirement years for our generation, as we watch the price of home heating and electricity rise to stratospheric levels... the cost of food skyrocket because of increased fuel costs of production and delivery of product. Of course manufacturing is affected as well by the rampant increase of doing business on this continent, all the while Asia (specifically China) is spewing out CO2 and particulates into the atmosphere with no control from those governments..... So how can Obama's promise of new jobs compete against manufacturing in a Far East that only plays by it's own rules, while here we wring our hands and constantly obsess about how to create a Greener World.


rick
said
0 0

Are these protestors insane? Haven't they seen how the courts deal with civil unrest? Just look back at the response to the recent Vancouver riots. This is one mighty brave, dedicated group of people, willing to risk everything they hold dear to stand up for their beliefs.


Leon
said
0 0

So, the alternative to the XL pipeline is to load foreign oil into tankers and ship it across some of the most sensitive environments on the planet (the oceans)? Much more damage done from oil leaks in the sea, than from leaks on land. Until there are viable and economically feasible alternatives to oil, these protesters are wasting their time with their overt dramatics.


anon625
said
0 0

Canada would be better to build it's own refineries instead of this pipeline. We can't predict what will happen with the pipeline and many have broken and left an environmental mess. With the tornadoes that run through the US there is a good chance one will hit the pipeline and create a huge disaster making one natural disaster into a man made disaster Valdeze all over again only this time on land. Now they want to ship oil through the Queen Charlottes as well Stop this madness already!!! I agree with the protesters. and more to come from them in the future as well


Wayne
said
0 0

This pipeline has been worked on for years and no one has said anything. Now that someone in the States thinks it is a bad thing then we start jumping on the bandwagon. The bad thing is that we are sending our resources to the States and they pay less than we do for the product. Wake up people.


Peter
said
0 0

It's very interesting how some people can be manipulated by so called Greenpeace and other groups. Why these people don't go on the streets screaming out loud, STOP the planet earth population growing at the light speed? It is the best way to save the planet. The trees are going, the monster building are growing. The plate tectonics are moving causing catastrophes. There is no clean air, no jobs for millions and millions of people, but some people care more about a pipeline which can be 100 per cent safer than human's faeces. One person dies and 20 or more are born at the same time. Just imagine the world with no electricity and food for 3 months.


Greg
said
0 0

It's funny because I just saw a commercial that had the co-founder of greenpeace discussing how the oil sands projects are being turned back into reclaimed environments once an area has been mined, to the point that no evidence is left of mining. It is not right to destroy environments all at once and not repair the landscape, but if, in the end, things are being turned back to the environments that they were before, this is an industry with far less environmental impact than many others. What I don't like, is giving the Americans, who are now in another 'buy American' our oil. Funny how oil still gets transported despite a 'buy American' policy. I cant wait to buy it back at an outrageous mark up.


bbinottawa
said
0 0

Please read and tell me if I am off-base. I am against the pipeline - and here's why. Obama wants a buy-american strategy for his country. Well, that's all fine and dandy. So, if he doesn't want Canadian imports, then let's shut off the oil from the sands. And lets shut off the natural gas from Sable Island. And lets shut off the hydro from Churchill Falls. Once all americans realize how dependant they are on Canadian resources, they'll be singing a different tune. I say use our own resources to keep our energy in Canada. If Venezuelans and Saudis can get their gas for 5c/litre, then why can't we. The only poeple geting rich from our resources now are Suncor, Emera and Hydro Quebec - and they have enough $ already. Remember that the oil sands are not going to last forever. Let's conserve what we have to make sure that CANADIANS have enough for the future.


Debbie
said
0 0

I thought we still had the right to protest in this country? Why aren't we refining the oil in this country and providing Canadians with good jobs? I thought Harper was all about jobs and the economy for Canadians or was he talking about providing jobs for the USA?


SK Ecologist
said
0 0

Fact: Wild, natural fires in the Canadian boreal forest disturb thousands of times more woodland caribou habitat than the oil sands development does...


JB in RD
said
0 0

Could everybody be a little more creative than "how did they get to Ottawa" or "what is that sign made out of" or "what heats your home?" I'm a huge oil and gas supporter and proudly work in it so don't take my comments as I support them; just find a new argument. And anybody that "doesn't like" the "tar sands" has never been to Fort Mac to see the OILsands and has no idea what they are talking about.


Prof. Pye Chartt
said
0 0

Overcelebrated and overpaid actors need extracurricular activities and political hobbies to cleanse their socioeconomic guilt and shame. (They know that their lives are rather obscene in societal context.) This pipeline protest marks another "opportunity" for some. As for the rest, upper-middle-class young adults who blunt their above-average intelligence with emotional and psychological immaturity also need to stay busy, feel connected, have a sense of belonging, and avoid the real world that, apparently, "ruins' other people. Ultimately, being informed isn't as important as being passionate, and being realistic isn't as important as being a dreaming idealist. Enjoy the molasses, kids, and have fun getting all that craved attention from the media.


Mick Shrimpton
said
0 0

Organizers say opponents risk arrest as they "gather on Parliament Hill in what stands to be a historic mass act of civil disobedience over the tar sands," What absolute horse poop! Hahahahaha!!! Fat lazy watermenlon enviromentalist have corralled their useful idiots to protest the GOOD idea buildng a pipeline from Alberta's OIL SANDS to refineries in the US. I bet there will be less than 100 UI protestors. This green movement is as signifcant as a bug hitting the windshield. And for the protestor who poured molasses over herself - better keep the wasp and bee spray close by honey - that was not well thought through. But then, what have these people ever thought through?


wm
said
0 0

"Why is this label "civil disobedience" they have the right to protest just like anyone else around the world protesting for a cause they believe in"Think you should read the PROTESTERS press release - it's the protesters themselves labeling it thus - not the media. This is Canada after all, they are welcome to protest without risk to life and limb - even if they are ignorant of the facts. I doubt that this universal right to protest you speak of can actually take place in 10 per cent of the world. Especially in the Middle East.


Lz in Edmonton
said
0 0

The uneducated love protests. This is about all the misinformation of the so called dirty oil. Well, go ahead and protest while we funnel billions more to Hugo and his oppression and Saudi with no voting for women and executions for the simpliest of things, or Nigeria where there is TRUE pollution for oil. Yes, Dirty Blood oil. For the protestors, please educate yourselves.


island girl
said
0 0

It's WAAAAYYY easier to get your pic and name in the paper for doing something destructive and bad than doing something that actually is constructive and helps people. For that reason we will always have 'protestors'.


Rick
said
0 0

I don’t think any can argue that to continue the North American life style requires the use of fossil fuels such as oil. The reality is that the Keystone pipeline is required to distribute oil to a place where it can be refined. The problem is that the Oil companies have such a dismal environmental record and have used many less than ethical methods to avoid being good environmental citizens with their policies of profit above all else. Personally I believe that many people’s problem is not so much with the Keystone Pipeline but with the environmental history of oil companies. In reality, no one trusts the “Big Greedy Oil Companies”. A classic example is the Deep Water Horizon Disaster where BP said they would follow environmental policies but all that went out the window when it started to cost BP money. By protesting the Keystone Pipeline many people feel that this is an opportunity to hold Oil companies accountable. Once the pipeline is built Big Oil holds all of the cards because there is no way the pipeline would ever be scrapped once built even if it causes an environmental disaster.


Ron
said
0 0

I would prefer to see this pipeline go coast to coast in Canada. We can also refine it here. Think of the jobs this will create. As far as the Americans are concerned, why not protest their coal mining? Some of the coal cities are deadly.


Steve H
said
0 0

Building the pipeline will create a small number of jobs most of the work will be done by big machines and a handful of people. When the pipeline is finished these people will be unemployed again. In the long haul this pipeline will take jobs from Canadians that presently move the oil down there. With all the advances in technology to date we still aren't seeing any lower prices at the pumps so what's the point in putting the people that currently move the oil out of work. Big oil is the only ones that will benefit from a pipeline. What are you and me going to get out of it? Fewer jobs, a huge inconvenience to those having their country side dug up and higher prices at the pump to pay for the pipe line.


Chris, Alberta
said
0 0

We've already seen what happens when this crud is spilled. People have a right and a reason to be concerned and it doesn't matter if they arrive by bicycle or jet plane - that red herring is irrelevant to the reality of environmental destruction caused by the TARsands boom frenzy.


Camwest
said
0 0

@Jason B... We are not making any refienries because we have no people to build them. The labour force in Western Canada is tapped dry. Our friends in Newfoundland have jobs back home now. There are rigs sitting because there are no workers. Everyone is being stretched to the limit.


Art in Alberta
said
0 0

I agree with our democratic rights to peacefully protest the issues we object to. What I don't agree with is when protest organizers say they are willing to be arrested "for their cause". This is no longer a peaceful protest and should be stopped before it even starts. Good luck to the RCMP today.


JPC
said
0 0

1) I'm pretty sure these folks flew a plane, drove a car or rode a train to this protest. 2) I'm pretty sure 100 per cent of these folks either use natural gas or oil to heat their homes in the winter. 3) The tax dollars and royalties collected from these "large oil producers" pays for MANY MANY govornment programs and services that these people use every day. Strict environmental rules should be followed HOWEVER this source of oil should not be ignored for our energy or economic needs.


Jayme
said
0 0

URUYes people have the right to a peaceful protest but that changes when they say they want to have a sit in and that is called "civil disobedience and don't forget its the protesters calling it that.


KC BC
said
0 0

Apparently there are several busloads of protesters arriving from all over Ontario and Quebec. I also missed the publicity that the buses are fueled by methane from manure or that the passengers have their own means of propulsion. I have no problem with the right to protest... just live the life. Could they not at least walk half of the distance? Now that would be publicity! By walking they could raise money for a needy cause as well.


Listen to the Protesters!
said
0 0

God forbid that some people would exercise their rights of expression over this government's inability to recognize that fossil fuels (while the lifeblood of so many right wingers in this forum) needs to be phased out. Your silly little whining about "how did they get to Ottawa" serves as a very immature example of what you really understand about this issue. If you don't care about the environment, think that global warming is an invention of Al Gore, believe that oil just isn't harmful, think that the sun is only good for getting a tan, and believe that wind turbines are a shocking environmental disaster, then change your automobile oil on your front lawn or in the middle of your vegetable garden, buy your 8 cylinder vehicles to take your garbage to the curb, sign up to have a pipeline run through your property, serve yourself up a plateful of Gulf shrimp, or better yet, move next to one of those attractive refineries you love so much (and apparently can't get enough of). As for those with a functioning brain in their head, they will lobby this government to wake up and smell the crude, that being the crude ignorance of not dealing with how this world is changing, recognizing that we can't continue like we are and being at the forefront of correcting the problem. The case you oil nuts present is weak, weak, weak.


sam america
said
0 0

Once again this "joe canada" displays his disdain for his neighbors to the south. His only concern is the fact the pipeline is going to America. He would rather it travel through Canada's parks than to allow it to go where the market is. Guess what bub, like it or not the USA is Canada's main trading partner. Canada cannot survive economically without America's wealth. With neigbors like you who needs enemies?


Jimminy Cricket
said
0 0

Why do we send crude oil to refineries in the US only to have them sell the finished product back to Canadians at an overinflated price? Refineries have closed in Canada over the past 10 years and lots of jobs have been lost. So we're sacraficing good paying jobs in exchange for overpriced gasoline and diesel. Thanks alot.


Leroy_Jethro_Gibbs
said
0 0

Are these people aware of the risk they pose to medicare, education, and other social programs with their stance? These things require massive amounts of money that can only be obtained through trade with the US - oil just happens to be the most remunerative. So, if you love Canada and its social safety net, you must support the Keystone XL pipeline.


Will
said
0 0

@ Mike Llyod. Oh you mean how BP knew what they were doing when they busted a line in the ocean and let it dump oil for days and days and days... 87 in total... Oh you mean how BP kept saying they knew how to fix it and didn't.... Oh you mean how it has now discovered they didn't know what they were doing, at all therefore had no business putting OIL lines in our WATERS..... oh, that's what you mean...... Let them continue to spoil this planet, for a buck. Oh, Okay, I understand your point.


perrinof2rivers
said
0 0

Let's keep everyone happy - shorten the pipepline to decrease chance of leaks and set up refineries in Alberta to keep our fuel prices at a reasonable level and profit off selling it to others.


URU
said
0 0

Why is this label "civil disobedience" they have the right to protest just like anyone else around the world protesting for a cause they believe in. Our so call "democratic system" is muting the public on decisions that are best in the Gov'ts interest without consulting with tax paying citizens. There is nothing "civil disobedience" about this except that they are protesting. We live in a authoritarian regime masked under the WORD Democracy only.


Camwest
said
0 0

I would bet that China is giving funds to help these protests. Last thing they want is the US with a reliable oil source. Go protest coal rather than oilsands, as coal is much much dirtier. Oilsands uses natural gas to seperate the sand and oil. The by-product of creating steam is electricity...


Intelligent Liberal
said
0 0

I wonder if all these celebrities drove their bicycles to get to Ottawa, or did they use fossil fuel powered vehicles? Their main celebrity and spokesperson is hoser Bob MacKenzie, who was popular in the 1970's, he even was in a movie. The fame of their celebrity is consistent with the importance of their protest. It will be comical to see people chaining themselves to a tree and having molasses poured over them, hope the wasps are not too thick today.


David
said
0 0

Simple, set up a registery for people who want to use "unethical oil". Their credit and debit cards could all then be disallowed to purchase "ethical oil". It is amazing how a country in the middle east has so much influence on Canadians; is it possible they could think for themselves and help Canada be a country of reponsible resources, help grow the economy and pensions of Canadians vs using resources from a dictatorship and watch North America die or be bought for cheap and the pipelines be run anyway?


joe canada
said
0 0

My protest of this pipeline concerns the fact that it is going to the states. I think it would be better to our coast and we then have the option of a larger customer base. the states can still buy it just not exclusively.


Jason B
said
0 0

Why not build an oil refinery instead of piping it to the US.


CDN OIL
said
0 0

Please let me be clear, I hate the oil sands and its impact on the environment etc... BUT... As long as Canadians use and need oil?, I feel Canada and Canadians should come first?, not the USA and China. All the Americans talk about is energy security & independence, why don't we?... "Canada imports more than half of the crude oil it needs. We purchase around 55 per cent of our oil from countries such as Algeria, Saudi Arabia and Venezuela. We are also turning increasingly toward new sources including Russian and African producers." -Canadians.org. And yet we cant pipe it out of Canada past Canadians fast enough?, only to import our own from dictators etc?, ZERO mention of our own energy security and/or independence, why?... Something smells? and its not just the oil sands...


Jobsman
said
0 0

Scrap the stupid pipeline. Build Canadian owned processing plants right here in Canada and create Canadian jobs. Then, next time the markets suffer a huge plunge, Canadian currency won't tank with it.

We're far too dependent on our primary resources. Just imagine the possibilities for our economy, for the environment, and for Canada, if we make smarter choices now.


SAM
said
0 0

I don't see any of these protesters offering up a 'solution' to our world's energy needs. Celebrities who take up causes are just another person with an opinion. Somebody tell me why non-celebrity people get so caught up in that??


Pat
said
0 0

How are all the protesters getting to Ottawa...are they all riding their bikes? Let's shut down the oil sands and watch this country go down the toilet faster than Greece is going. These protestors don't seem to object to the 500 coal-fired plants in the U.S... but because Obama is President, no one demonstrates in America anymore. Who funds Greenpeace... Saudi Arabia??


Mike - Lloyd
said
0 0

Do any of these people actually have a clue about what they're protesting against? Or is it just fashionable to spout off without much thought of the benefits to this country in time of economic turmoil? Technology today is far greater than even a few years ago, monitoring the line for leaks is a daily operation. There are thousands of miles of lines that never lose a drop in their lifetime. Its the one bad apple spoils it for everyone syndrome. If they are so worried about converting to clean energy, ask these people how many birds are killed everyday in the wind generating turbines. I'm sure they would be shocked to see the totals when compared to the tailings ponds incidents that bring about huge fines to the oil companies.


Borpo
said
0 0

How did they get to Ottawa? I missed the Horse "n Buggy caravan on the news...


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

In Pictures

Pipeline Protest

Pipeline Protest

In Pictures: Pipeline protesters risk arrest through acts of civil disobedience.

Alberta's Oilsands

Alberta's Oilsands

30 Pictures: A rare look at the magnitude of oilsands projects in Alberta.

Today's Top Stories

Labour Minister Lisa Raitt speaks in the House of Commons in Ottawa on Monday, May 28, 2012. (Adrian Wyld / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Federal government orders end to CP Rail strike

More   51 Comments 51    7 Video(s) 7

Dominic and Abby Maryk were found in Mexico four years after allegedly being abducted by their father.

Extradition sought in Winnipeg missing children case

More   4 Comments 4    3 Video(s) 3

Protesters opposing Quebec student tuition fee hikes demonstrate in Montreal, Sunday, May 27, 2012. (Graham Hughes / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Quebec, students to resume talks on tuition hikes

More   26 Comments 26    1 Video(s) 1