Top Stories -   

1

Canada's Libya mission tab at $26M and counting

Defence Minister Peter MacKay delivers a speech at CANSEC 2011, Defence and Security Trade Show in Ottawa on Thursday, June 2, 2011. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS) Defense minister Peter MacKay listens to questions during a media conference at a meeting of NATO defense ministers at NATO headquarters in Brussels on Thursday, June 9, 2011. (AP / Virginia Mayo) A smoke and dust cloud from an explosions rises into the sky after a NATO airstrike in Tripoli, Libya Tuesday, June 7, 2011. (AP / Abdel Meguid al-Fergany) Libyans rally next to Moammar Gadhafi's Bab al-Aziziya compound, a regular target of NATO airstrikes, in Tripoli, Libya, on Tuesday, June 7, 2011. (AP / Ivan Sekretarev) NATO airstrikes are rattling the Libyan capital, with seven thunderous explosions shaking the city.
Defence Minister Peter MacKay delivers a speech at CANSEC 2011, Defence and Security Trade Show in Ottawa on Thursday, June 2, 2011. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

View Larger Image

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (29) Facebook   

Date: Thursday Jun. 9, 2011 5:09 PM ET

Canada's mission to Libya has cost $26 million to date, and the price tag will likely more than double by the fall, said Defence Minister Peter MacKay at a NATO summit.

Canada is a participant in a NATO-led mission to protect Libya's civilian population from fighters loyal to Moammar Gadhafi.

"The cost of this leadership, with respect to Canada's contribution to protect civilian lives, is estimated currently at $26 million until June 2, and we need to continue the momentum we've achieved thus far," MacKay told a news conference Wednesday in Brussels.

On Tuesday, MPs will vote in the House of Commons on a proposal to extend the four-month old Libya mission to September, a move that would be in line with NATO's timeline.

Doing so, MacKay said, would bring the cost of the mission to about $60 million.

The costs are associated with Canada's fighter and patrol planes which have been helping protect civilians since March when the United Nations voted to impose a no-fly zone over Libya.

On Wednesday, retired Major-General Lewis MacKenzie told CTV.ca the three-month extension would provide little comfort to Libyans hoping for long-term security.

While Libyan rebels initially made great strides in their uprising to oust Gadhafi, the battle has slipped into stalemate in recent weeks. While rebels control large parts of eastern Libya, Gadhafi's stronghold is in the west.

NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said recently NATO has no plans to remain in Libya after the conflict ends.

Comments are now closed for this story

rick
said

This money should have been better spent here in Canada. Our airforce should be tasked to protect our north by fighting the out of control fires that are burning already this season.


John
said

Sniper Rifle rounds cost about $2.00 each. See where I'm going with this? Much cheaper


Jennifer
said

This money could be best spent at home in Canada to help Canadians excluding Quebec whom already scams 60% of federal equalization transfers from Canadian tax dollars by portraying itself as a "have not province" yet in the same breath calling itself a nation independent of Canada. Foreign wars are just not Canada's priority and we need a national dental care program which would cut the costs of overall health care because bad teeth cause a myriad of health problems that would have been prevented had oral dental health been attainable by those who cannot afford it.


Mark
said

Here’s a question posted earlier “why don't they use this money at home to feed the poor and help seniors living in poverty?" and the stellar war mongering answer was “Because we are not a welfare state and we have international commitments and a moral obligation to prevent genocide. Any other questions?” Yes I have a question? Does that mean that a foreign country that takes its international commitments and moral obligations at heart should come to the aid of Canada’s poor and seniors?


M
said

Why are we (the west) even in Libya? Why didn't the Arab League intervene in that conflict and all of the others that are occuring? Why are we involved in Libya but not Syria? It's much the same situation


MARG MM
said

No matter how much money is spent on anything, the Conservatives are "damned if they do and damned if they don't". Let the Government do their job, we have an obligation to help the oppressed in other parts of the world, and being part of NATO, reinforces that. If we weren't there helping, imagine the outrage.


Rickey K
said

As far as I'm concerned, the previous writer said it all. These people are backwards, to the point of stone age equivalency. Stopping a war in one country only leads to sparking one in another. God or Allah gave them oil, that's all they have going for them. No artists, no world leaders, no arts people or musicians of any note ever came from any of these countrys. Bring the troops home and let them slaughter each other as they have done for centuries. The faster we run out of oil, the faster we will learn to live without it. Once westerners do that, the middle east will become irrelavent


Rudy Haugeneder
said

Government lies.
Defence Minister Peter MacKay says Canada’s military – the taxpayer -- has spent $26 million so far in Libya.
That likely just covers military wages and Tim Horton coffee, not the cost of incredibly expensive and sophisticated bombs, fuel, wear and tear on equipment, etc., etc.
The true cost is at least, at least, five or ten times the amount MacKay says it cost. Otherwise Canada fights modern war cheaper than anybody else on the planet – far, far cheaper.
Mackay says Canadian fighter jets and patrol aircraft have 1,750 hours and 360 sorties for the fighter aircraft and over 530 hours and 65 sorties for the maritime patrol aircraft. – for at total of 424 bombing raids. In addition, the HMCS Charlottetown is patrolling offshore.
As of June 2, officials at the Department of Defence say Canada’s contribution to the NATO-led mission includes flying around 10 per cent of the coalition’s offensive air strikes and dropping about (very expensive) 270 laser-guided bombs over the North African country.
As well, Al Jazeera on May 30 broadcast TV footage showing a group of armed Westerners (including Canadian troops?) with rebel fighters near the city of Misrata.
Hey MacKay, tell us the truth. How much is it really costing Canadian taxpayers?


Cambob in Toronto
said

So far, this is cheaper than federal funding for political parties. And far more of an investment in the future.


GHW
said

Difficult to say how this will all work out in the end. It may be okay or it may bite us. In general I lean toward not getting involved in the Middle East. Most of them are unredeemably backwards, Canada certainly does not need their oil and the UN are a bunch of messed up lefty socialists who could and probably will destroy us all. The global community is going to hell in hand basket. Lets mind our own business, spend our money at home.


ouifyg
said

If we have a moral obligation to prevent genocide, then why aren't we protecting the civilians in Yemen or in Syria where the local governments have slaughtered thousands of unarmed men, women and children and continue to kill more? I guess we get more oil for our buck in Libya.


Carl
said

Participating in this UN-sanctioned NATO mission to protect the civilian population of Libya from the tyrant Gadhafi is the simply the right thing to do. I'm dismayed that there are so many Canadians who would have our country stand by and do nothing while innocents are slaughtered and our allies fight injustice. Tens of millions of dollars is a very very small price to pay. The government spends far more on far less important and fundamental things.


CAMWEST
said

The people complaining about spending this money would be the first ones complaining if something like Rwanda happened again.


Greg - Signs and Wonders
said

Canadian Accounts Payable Dept, can you please forward me a balance sheet detailing the expenses?Do we have transperancy in this country?


Wow
said

"We used to be Peace Makers,"We? How many peacekeeping missions have you been on ? I'm guessing none. So please don't try and speak for those of us who have. What a joke.


Colin
said

"We used to be Peace Makers, "Right, so it's our fault there is no peace to keep?Time to shake off that 90"s brainwashing dude. These wonderfull peacekeeping missions you remember so fondly still resulted in the deaths of many of my commrades. But whatever fantasy helps you sleep better at night right lol.


Mike M
said

We actually used to be Peace keepers, but now we are peace makers. The difference is peace keeping you sand there and politely ask both sides to stop hurting each other. Peace making is done by FORCING a side to make peace.


Give your head a shake
said

So Gahaddafi was about to slaughter tens of thousands of people in Miastra and people on here are worried about a few civilians being killed in NATO airstrikes? Wow that's some twisted logic. I realize anything the west does militarily will never be supported by the left and thats fine. It sure goes a long way towards explaining why they aren't in power any more.


Fred
said

"Instead of completly wasting 60 million taxpayer dollars on a war going nowhere why don't they use this money at home to feed the poor and help seniors living in poverty?"Because we are not a welfare state and we have international commitments and a moral obligation to prevent genocide. Any other questions?


FCS
said

I agree lets just ignore genocide and violations of basic human rights because it may cost a few dollars to prevent. While we are at it lets just close our eyes and cover our ears and pretend we are not part of NATO or the global community. I mean it's not like the rebels in Libya fighting for thier freedom are human beings or anything. God forbid your "tax dollars" (lol) be used for something so frivilous.


Munro - GTA
said

We used to be Peace Makers, now we have joined the NWO club of War on the World. It's shamefull how the airstrikes have killed hundreds of citizens that otherwise would have lived out their lives. But I guess they are not worthy victim's.


Michael
said

I thought the mission was to establish a "NO FLY ZONE" not a kill "Mohmar Gaddafi" at any cost war. Is it possible that tax payers have been lied to and mislead again?What happened with the dictatorship being on the brink of collapse with high ranking military and political officials defecting? By the sounds of it Libya's military is doing just fine and they must have some sort of chain of command. Who are the rebels were spending all this money on to defend?What about Syria? Seems to me that dictator is just as bad if not worse than Gaddafi, why aren't we bombing the crap out of him?HMMMM could it be that we are not there to save the people of Libya, is it possible that this rebellion was staged for the media to sell? NNNOOO that's crazy talk, the UN would never allow such things to happen.


Mike vdB - Chatham, ON
said

We support Libya's "freedom fighters" because the current leader of the country is a quack. Yet NATO and the UN look on while the Syrian regime brutally kills its own people to quash a popular (mostly peaceful) uprising. To me, I don't care if Mr. Assad is of more stable mind. Anyone who kills and terrorizes his own people is still a quack. Can anyone let me know how the two are different?


Jaid in Toronto
said

Sometimes these costs make me wonder whether it's actually being spent on military, I just get that feeling that it's being spent politically.


gatvol, Edmonton
said

How about we just butt out of other countries business? Why are we even there? Because Gadhafi has a poor human rights record? So what about Zimbabwe then? Why aren't we there? How about we stop policing the world like the Americans do and focus our energy on making Canada a better place.


scott nova scotia
said

Wow, Gadhafi sure must be an important guy to spend so much to try and kill him.


RJ in Halifax
said

When the "cost" of missions such as this are calculated, are the ongaoing costs for military personnel included? This would be somewhat misleading if so. We have to pay our military regardless of where they happen to be stationed. Costs for naval ships, fighter and support aircraft and personnel all get paid even if everyone is back home, sitting in front of their televisions.


Larry I Ontario
said

Instead of completly wasting 60 million taxpayer dollars on a war going nowhere why don't they use this money at home to feed the poor and help seniors living in poverty? When will this government and all governments wake up and stop abusing our hard earned tax dollars?


gerald
said

Drop in the bucket , U.S. spends that per second.Cash in some of Daffy's gold bars.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Top Stories

Labour Minister Lisa Raitt appears on CTV's Power Play on Monday, May 28, 2012.

Federal government orders end to CP Rail strike

More   51 Comments 51    11 Video(s) 11

Dominic and Abby Maryk were found in Mexico four years after allegedly being abducted by their father.

Extradition sought in Winnipeg missing children case

More   4 Comments 4    3 Video(s) 3

Protesters opposing Quebec student tuition fee hikes demonstrate in Montreal, Sunday, May 27, 2012. (Graham Hughes / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Quebec, students resume talks on tuition hikes

More   26 Comments 26    1 Video(s) 1