Top Stories -   

1

High-level commission declares drug war unwinnable

Members of the Global Commission on Drug Policy, Fernando Henrique Cardoso, left, former President of Brazil and the commission's chairman, hands over a microphone to Cesar Gaviria, former President of Colombia, during a news conference at the Waldorf Astoria in New York on Thursday, June 2, 2011. (AP / Bebeto Matthews) A child sits in a shelter at the Lions Club set up for residents of the nearby town of Ciudad Mier who fled drug violence, in Miguel Aleman, Mexico on the border with Texas, Thursday Nov. 18, 2010. (AP / Dario Lopez-Mills) Federal police present to the news media a cache of weapons and nearly 50 suspects of two major drug cartels in Mexico City, Saturday May 28, 2011. (AP Photo/Miguel Tovar) Seized narcotics burn on the outskirts of Tijuana, Mexico, Wednesday Sept. 22, 2010. (AP Photo/Guillermo Arias) A soldier escorts Jesus Ivan Quezada Pena, an alleged member of the criminal gang led by Julian Zapata Espinoza, not shown, who is the main suspect in the Feb. 15 killing of U.S. Immigration and Customs, ICE, agent Jaime Zapata, during a presentation for the media in Mexico City, Wednesday, Feb. 23, 2011. (AP Photo/Miguel Tovar) An image of the Virgin of Guadalupe is seen at the site where rival gangs held a gunbattle in Tecalitlan, Jalisco, western Mexico, late Friday, Dec. 10, 2010. (AP Photo / Raul Aguilar) A police officer is seen through a bullet riddled truck window on a road leading to the city of Morelia, Mexico, Thursday, Dec. 9, 2010. (AP Photo) Officers uncovered 46 kilograms of cocaine in the minivan.
Members of the Global Commission on Drug Policy, Fernando Henrique Cardoso, left, former President of Brazil and the commission's chairman, hands over a microphone to Cesar Gaviria, former President of Colombia, during a news conference at the Waldorf Astoria in New York on Thursday, June 2, 2011. (AP / Bebeto Matthews)

View Larger Image

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (62) Facebook   

Date: Thursday Jun. 2, 2011 10:27 AM ET

According to a new report, not only is the global war on drugs a failure, but unless governments shift their focus from criminal justice to public health the problems will just keep getting worse.

The damning conclusion was arrived at by a 19-member commission that includes former heads of state, a business mogul and the current prime minister of Greece.

Acting under the banner Global Commission on Drug Policy, theirs is the highest-level panel to ever reach such conclusions on the international approach to curbing illegal drug use.

"Political leaders and public figures should have the courage to articulate publicly what many of them acknowledge privately: that the evidence overwhelmingly demonstrates that repressive strategies will not solve the drug problem, and that the war on drugs has not, and cannot, be won," the report said.

Arguing that the criminalization of drug use punishes users rather than offering them potentially beneficial health and treatment services, the report suggests targeting organized crime syndicates instead.

In its report, the commission recommends governments:

  • end criminalization of drug users "who do no harm to others," as well as low level farmers, couriers and "petty sellers"
  • experiment with legal regulation of drugs "to undermine the power of organized crime and safeguard the health and security of their citizens"
  • offer health and treatment services such as supervised use facilities and syringe access rather than "abusive practices carried out in the name of treatment -- such as forced detention"
  • abandon the 'just say no' approach to education in favour of "efforts grounded in credible information and prevention programs that focus on social skills and peer influences"
  • focus law enforcement efforts "not on reducing drug markets per se but rather on reducing their harms"

Calling the global drug policy "one of the key policy challenges of our time," the report is particularly critical of lawmakers' reluctance to consider other approaches.

"In spite of the increasing evidence that current policies are not achieving their objectives, most policymaking bodies at the national and international level have tended to avoid open scrutiny or debate on alternatives," the report states.

"The time is now right for a serious, comprehensive and wide-ranging review of strategies to respond to the drug phenomenon," the report continues, suggesting policy must be based on "recognition of the global drug problem as a set of interlinked health and social challenges to be managed, rather than a war to be won."

In a statement released to coincide with the commission's report, the U.S. Office of National Drug Control Policy took issue with its premise and conclusions.

"(U.S.) efforts to reduce drug use are not born out of a culture war or drug war mentality, but out of the recognition that drug use strains our economy, health, and public safety," spokesperson Rafael Lemaitre wrote, touting the "big difference" U.S. drug control efforts have made.

"Drug addiction is a disease that can be successfully prevented and treated. Making drugs more available -- as this report suggests -- will make it harder to keep our communities healthy and safe."

While the office of White House drug czar Gil Kerlikowske points to a 46 per cent drop in current cocaine use among young people between the ages of 18 and 25 in the past five years as an example that country's successful policy, the Global Commission's report comes to a different conclusion.

Citing the United Nations' annual drug consumption estimates, the report points to a 34.5 per cent increase in opiate use, 27 per cent rise in cocaine use and an 8.5 per cent jump in marijuana use during the ten years ending in 2008.

Recalling the launch of the drug war by then- president Richard Nixon four decades ago, and the hope it would gradually lead to 'drug free world', the report suggests it has had an opposite effect.

"In practice, the global scale of illegal drug markets -- largely controlled by organized crime -- has grown dramatically over this period."

Besides former UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan, the 19-member commission included former U.S. Federal Reserve chairman Paul Volcker, the former presidents of Mexico, Brazil and Colombia, writers Carlos Fuentes and Mario Vargas Llosa and British business mogul Richard Branson.

With files from The Associated Press

Comments are now closed for this story

Chris420
said
0 0

It's ironic. When a Muslim country throws someone in jail for drinking alcohol, we bash them for being so backwards. Yet we throw people in jail for smoking pot (as if there's a big difference)


C'mon!
said
0 0

The number of people arguing here for strong penalties are further advancing the same reasons the Drug War has failed. Every time penalties are increased, drug use has increased! Then after these people get off the computer they pour themselves a drink. . .


Marcel NWO
said
0 0

Who brought these people together and what basement did they meet in? I find these suggestion to be totally against reason. If they have their way they will give kids guns because they are going to do it anyways. How about inviting terrorist into our homes so that they won't feel so rejected. What logic are these people drawing from? THERE IS MONEY TO BE MADE WITH THESE SUGGESTION JUST LIKE GLOBAL WARMING.


Laurie
said
0 0

I never did, and never will, buy into that platitude we hear over and over again "Drug addiction is a disease".It is not a disease! It begins with experimental use of drugs "quite willingly" and progresses by "free choice" until it takes over the will and destroys mind, body and soul.Until our culture admits that, we will never be able to overcome drug abuse.


Redneck Albertan
said
0 0

Of course the war on drugs is a farce. In order to win any war, the people have to be behind the effort. Laws against "soft drugs", such as pot, make the whole effort seem ridiculous. People are too savvy to fall for the scare tactics, so another, more sensible approach has to be made: Legalize, control and tax marijuana, then create the most draconian laws imaginable for the crack, crystal meth, cocaine, heroin, etc., dealers/traffickers. Those scumbags are the ones poisoning our society, not the Dorito munching console gamers. :)


Carl
said
0 0

Of course criminal sanctions alone cannot eliminate the illicit drug trade. Criminal sanctions alone also cannot eliminate any other undesirable behaviour, including impaired driving, child pornography, or even murder. But that does not mean strong criminal sanctions against these things should not remain. It just means we also have to attack these problems from a cultural and educational angle. Criminal sanctions are still needed as part of an overall approach.


robin hood
said
0 0

Question— how do you differentiate between government and organized crime? Answer— although both have a code of silence the criminals are more organized!


Wes
said
0 0

ya think!!!...


mike747
said
0 0

Criminalization of "illegal" drugs and prostitution is only BIG money making scheme. The ones, that making sure it's stays that way are the ones that are profiting from it. What about "legal" drugs being fed to us by big pharma companies ? Heck our care-taking mother government is even making sure selling unpasteurized milk is illegal. Imagine being busted as unpasteurized milk dealer ! And yes, police is wasting time on this issue! In the name of protecting public health. Nobody is saying to legalize "illegal"drugs" so we can pick it at the cash register like a candies. REGULATE not criminalize is the way !!! E.g. second hand smoking marihuana should not be allowed to protect the kids as is second hand smoking right now. Imagine the money and resources that is now spent and wasted in fighting this to be spent on regulation, education, prevention and helping people to kick off the habit? Who do you think drug cartels are making sure stay in political/legal power?


Craig from NS
said
0 0

A blind, mute monkey could have come to that conclusion. It goes to show you a disadvantaged primate is smarter than our political leaders.


Mark
said
0 0

Alcohol is worse than drugs not because it is legal and easier to obtain it is worse because it is such a powerful drug that it overwhelms ones emotions and ability to think strait. Obviously, not all drugs should be decriminalized but what is softer than alcohol that causes less violence and suffering such as marijuana needs to be labeled differently.


Peter in MB
said
0 0

Who are these people on this Global Commission? What are their qualifications and experiences on the war against drugs? I see that the current prime minister of Greece is on the commotion, here is a man who can’t run his own country that is on the verge of bankruptcy. I hardly think he is qualified to comment on the Americans war against drugs.


Blair from Dal
said
0 0

There has always been a drug problem and there always will be. What worries me is the problem has now reached epidemic proportions. There is always a segment of the population who will use drugs no matter what, but beyond that there are more people abusing drugs than then there should be.The family unit has changed, youth growing up do not have the guidance, mentors, or attention of adults raising them. The youth who do have a solid family home are mixed in with many others who don't. There are no consequences for actions anymore. No one fails school. No one gets in trouble with the law (YCJA).Youth are growing up with a sense of entitlement and parents have been raised themselves by people who didn't know how to parent, so now they don't either.This has become a societal problem, and we are screwed. There is no coming back from this one.


Firinn
said
0 0

And the higher then thou stewards of the Harper Government and their blind legions have decreed the crime rate is so HIGH ( no pun there) that super max prisons should be built and model our criminal justice system with the outstanding example of the USA. Grow six pot plants, which is so small for any one who has an illness, and off to jail you go. Talk about PROGRESS.


Ron J.
said
0 0

If we're "losing" the war on drugs, it just goes to show you how stupid people really are -- wasting their money and health on drugs. Fools.


Dave T
said
0 0

I agree with Sean death penalty for Harder Drugs such as Cocaine or Meth etc ! Weed and other i would say life in prison...No room you say in the jails how many islands are there in the world empty they can turn into prisons for didlers and drug dealers !!! Please get them off the street and win this war before my son gets to school !!!


Realist
said
0 0

Its clear from these comments most of you have never done any drugs. Take it from a respected community member, professional father of two who thankfully navigated the world of drugs safely, the time has come to rethink. First of all: Experts who have no experience with drugs. You need to really know what different drugs do and what motivations for doing them are and "escaping reality" is naive. Number 2, STOP LUMPING ALL DRUGS TOGETHER. If you try to deal with heroin and pot as if they are the same thing, you have lost the battle already. There is little correlation and their is no such thing as a "gateway" drug because the sensations of one drug are often highly different than another ( only one way to know that). People are the gateway, facilitated by bad advice and bad choices. Heroin and Cocaine are dangerous and unbelievably addictive, well beyond marijuana and cigarettes (a proven killer that the government continues to reap taxes from). Pot in moderation, used intelligently and in safe circumstances (i.e. not in the house with your kids around, or before operating a jumbo jet ) is safe. Are you healthier and more productive without it? Yes, but you can kill yourself faster with alchohol and eating fast food everyday and that's legal. Leading me to my last point: Democracy. If people want to smoke pot and end up as a mid level manager or fry cook and not get their PHD as a result, that's their right. The public has spoken, which is why there are parphenalia shops in every city. And these customers can get destructive drugs if they want. But they don't want to. I'll leave the failed "supports organized crime" premise to those posting about the failed prohibition efforts here.


Sick Society
said
0 0

Clearly the world has gone mad. The great preponderance of the population does not know the difference between good or evil, right or wrong and has no clue about how society operates and the long term effects of drugs on our culture.


nightsun2k7
said
0 0

Does anyone remember when they made it legal for a woman to go topless? All i heard from conservitives was "oh no! there's going to be naked women everywhere, what's this country coming to?!?" Yet, I for one in all these years since they made it legal have not seen a single women walking down the street with her breasts exposed. The same thing applies to drugs like marijuana. If you make it legal, the country isn't suddenly going to be filled with pot heads. Trust me, anyone who wants to smoke it allready is. The only thing you'll do by ending prohibition is stop costing Canadians millions in wasted money and god forbid collect a little in revenue by regulating it. Wake up people, don't let the government build these massive jails to house some minor pot dealers and smokers....we live in Canada.....not the United States!


Proud Albertan
said
0 0

I agree - the death penalty for drug dealers AND make it perfectly legal to discriminate against drug users. Flunk a random drug test - and any employer should be able to do them - and the employer can have you automatically terminated. No exceptions, no "wrongful dismissal", you're just "FIRED!" We'll see how attractive drugs are when you can't even keep a Mcjob.


totaljustice
said
0 0

Here's an idea. Maybe the governments should tell their citizens that all of the money/property seized in Drug Busts would be divided between those (including the police) whose actions led to the arrests of the guilty. I would be willing to bet that would start to turn the tide in the war fairly quickly. It would also go a long way to reduce corruption. Maybe it's time for criminals to be afraid for a change.


zane
said
0 0

I hear a lot of right and left wing solutions, but in reality any solution will have to come out of the middle. As a society we have to be pragmatic as the good of the many has to outweigh the few. The drug problem is not going to go away, it is a symptom of a sick society. We need to deal with this on all fronts, at the same time. Drugs are the bane of our existence today.


David H.
said
0 0

Illegal drugs are nothing compared to the pharmaceutical drugs that kill and maim people everyday. Prednisone, NSAIDs, Anti-depressants; all still on the market causing more harm than good. Yet that's only a drop in the bucket. Natural remedies, however, have never caused a single death in all recorded history. Everyone at Health Canada and the FDA are stupid idiots. They should be imprisoned.


A guy
said
0 0

To the folks saying alcohol is worse than drugs, in the current state of affairs, I wouldn't be surprised. Alcohol is legal and therefore easier to obtain than drugs(just walk into a store basically). Therefore, it's not surprising that in VOLUME, alcohol committed felonies are higher because the access is easier.


Joey
said
0 0

The drug war is a complete joke. Take a look around at all the people who can’t survive their life without coffee in the morning. We are all humans we are all going to choose whatever path we want. No matter how bad the consequences are people will continue to do it. The root of this problem isn't ever going to be solved. We have legal drugs, illegal drugs, drugs are everywhere and people will continue to use them. Education and treatment are the only way this will ever be solved. Look at prohibition how did that go and oh wait isn't alcohol the only drug you can’t quit cold turkey. Hmmm


E
said
0 0

You can not argue science. The cat is out of the bag on this issue. You also cannot legislate morality. People have access to drugs know, so the idea that our society will "go to hell in a hand basket" is off. Anyone using now will continue to use, and those who choose not to will continue down their road. Just because you legalize something doesn't mean use will necessarily go up. Look at cigarettes. We did not need to make them illegal to get the idea through to people that they are bad for your health. Cannabis needs to be regulated and taxed the same as alcohol. Right now, drug dealers do not card because their is no regulation. Busting people over their head and imprisoning people has failed. This blood lust coming from the prohibition crowd shows how addicted they are to the money and violence associated with the drug war.


corey from alberta
said
0 0

harsher penalities for drug dealers will only cause more problems... it wont act as a deterrent but rather encourage further crimes and criminal action on drug dealers behalf. Drug dealers provide merchandise... its the drug users problem if they purchase it.


Gerry fron MB.but not N.D.P.
said
0 0

Socialists at the U.N.drugs are for losers shoot all drug sellers end of problem.


DAVE
said
0 0

Now there is a very smart person who ever said that.


MuskyBuck
said
0 0

Wow, I read the comments here today and I can't even begin to phrase both my surprise and wonder regarding how well informed and articulate the posters are on this issue.....////You all have done some homework on how we've all been duped by the war on drugs, how it's destroyed our society and has made the US justice system (corrupt) enriched.....////Jean Cretien was going to stick marijuana decriminalization right in the face of the US, Bush in turn slapped sanctions on Canada that we fought in the WTO for years afterwards.....//////I will say that the US system of justice has long been corrupted by corporate interests along with the interests of federal departments of justice in regards to employment numbers, lawyers who make trade from this and let's not forget the extremely well documented cases of judges in the US who get kickbacks from keeping privately owned jails full....../////I'll use one case as an example of everything that is wrong with the war on drugs and that is in California where one man recently was sentenced to life in prison......his third strike as it were for marijuana possession and trafficking......////Can you imagine? Life in prison? For marijuana?Where's the room for murderers, rapists and bankers?


David
said
0 0

People that don't want to try drugs, that know better, won't.People that want to try them, will.Drug trafficking is a multi-billion dollar a year industry. SOMEBODY is using all that heroin/cocaine/marijuana, and not using it legally. If the traffickers can make billions a year off drug sales, I suggest that criminalization hasn't worked.This is supply and demand, there is very obviously a huge market for it, and I don't think it's all being driven by the Lower East Side. Something tells me the billions aren't coming from there.Besides, Darwin had some good ideas that have worked for a long time...


Sean
said
0 0

I would like to see the death penalty extended to drug dealers. If they are going to kill and destroy lives with their merchandise, they should pay the ultimate price. I believe this policy would considerably raise street prices and make it too dangerous to deal.


Good News
said
0 0

At last, common sense prevails! Drugs are harmful but to heap the harm of imprisonment upon those addicted or using is the worst thing we can do.By decriminalizing drugs, even going so far as to legalize growing marijuana in quantities deemed reasonable for personal consumption (much as we permit the home making of wine and beer), will cut the legs right out from under the cartels. Their markets will crumble! We can can control the harder drugs, dramatically reduce the costs of law enforcement, our courts, imprisonment and put the dollars towards improving healthcare. It's truly a win-win-win initiative for government, drug users and our society!!!


Grandma in the west
said
0 0

We need to go back to the days where they hung people like that! Consequences, its all about needing consequences. That is the only way it will stop....and we don't need those kind of people around for anything...they are useless. The government is no dong anything because they are making money on it...so they can fill their pockets....corruptions and more coruptions!It is really a no brainer solution


JB in Ontario
said
0 0

I hate drugs, there should be stiiffer penalties for those engaged in drug use and trafficking.


Kevin J.
said
0 0

I am a former drug investigator. I spent a lot of time investigating dealers, including making undercover buys, conducting surveillance, and listening in on wiretaps. Cocaine, meth, heroin, weed. You name it. But the one thing about weed that still bugs me is how it affects the children in the house. These guys smoke up at home all the time. It's in the air, so their kids are forced to breathe it in. The development of these kids is being affected by marijuana smoke-filled houses. So don't compare marijuana to alcohol. Alcohol doesn't do that.


Dave
said
0 0

With wanting to legalize drugs comming out of this supposed inteligent group of persons, I would like to have what they were smoking at the time. Give your heads a shake, I can see it now-corner stores selling cocane, herion, crack and anybody can buy them. What a society we would have. Next thing you would want to legalize is murder, rape etc., because we are spending monies on trying to stop that to. Thank goddness that we did not get the left wing nuts running this government in Canada.


MuskyBuck
said
0 0

Oh I can't wait to read the comments from the academics hanging around here....////There's nothing that illustrates how little the average person understands both sides of the story than to read the comments of people who gain their one sided perspective from reading headlines.


Intuitive
said
0 0

Why do some use,why do some deal? Escape reality? the money? Maybe a different approach? Do we spend money incarerating and treating. Or find something else for these people to spend their days doing? Sounds like we need a good job creatation program here. As Bob Dylan wrote "When We Gonna Wake Up". Like an alcholic admitting to it, the High level commissions admitting today the War on Drugs has failed can hopefully take it in a different direction. As children we were taught to ask question,unfortunately our Government don't.


Doug ^^^ BC
said
0 0

I'd have to agree that the legal system will never be able to keep dugs out of the hands of the morons sho take them.Prohibition has never really succeeded at anything. However,I would ask "Pat Ottawa" to turn that question around.We are all appualed at how much we spend keeping drug use as low as possible. But,how much more would these drugs be costing us if they were legal? I suggest that the cost to the health care system would surpass the costs of the legal system 10X over. Persoanally,I don't care what people want to smoke,snort,shoot,or rub into the belly buttons if they want to.It's their life they are gambling with.Alll I want is for them to know that they have to go down that road ON THEIR OWN DIME. The problem with not minimizing drug use as much as possible,is that the entire GDP of this country would never cover the costs of dealing with more addicts.Taxpayers should NEVER be taxed to pay for the needs of any of these first class fools. Do your dope.But no wefare for you.Your health care costs are your responsibility.You can't eat because you're to stoned or addicted to hold a job? Your problem,my friend.


Kevin G. McDonald
said
0 0

Who said we have to win every war or that all wars are winnable or have ends?You fight something because it is bad for society. just slowing it down as much as we can might be all we can do for now and it's defeatist to quit because it's not winnable - you only quit if drugs are suddenly good for us and they aren't and many soft drugs are proven gateway drugs to deadly and addictive harder stuff.More leftist twaddle from our betters at that talking shop on the Hudson.


Canada Goose
said
0 0

Too funny, a while back I heard a RCMP radio ad that said, 1 in 3 crimes are committed by people that use drugs.so report anyone you see using drugs. What? If 2 out of 3 crimes are committed by people not using drugs, shouldn't we be reporting people that don't use drugs. According to this police ad twice as many crimes are committed by people that don't use drugs. Some studies in the US show that alcohol is involved in 81% of homicides, 73% of felonies, 83% of wife beatings and 67% of child beatings. It's pretty obvious the one drug that causes crime is alcohol not the illegal drugs.


NO a drug user
said
0 0

Eh!!!! No one is saying legalize all the hard drugs out there. But if the softer drugs were legalized, don't you think half of the time wasted on busting grow ops, etc could be better spent on real crimes by the cops / layers / etc. I don't smoke pot, but i do think its a huge waste of time and money chasing the people involved.


Thomas
said
0 0

Though I totally disagree with the use of drugs and alcohol, it is self abuse and un-Godly in my view. However, making drugs illegal even though drugs use as a whole causes harm to society as a collective and weighs on the public coffers, I can't help this feeling that to continue to have drugs illegal reeks of some creeps way of making money. You get foolish rednecks going around using it as an excuse to make mega prisons rather than address the issues of why people turn to drugs in the first place. Pray for those that need it, those caught in the world of drugs, include those lost souls that see money as the be all and end all, they are worse off than the drug addicted.


encore
said
0 0

The days of Al Capone should have convinced all that prohibition produces results just not the ones intended.But as with most idiotic blunders in history it is almost a certainty that the overlords will repeat them again and again and again..............


Mark in Wpg
said
0 0

If they legalized absolutely everything tomorrow, how many of you would go out and buy a big bag of heroin? Not many I'd wager since most people know better. Those that don't are most likely already on drugs, we might as well tax their habit to recoup some of the health care costs they accrue.


Stu
said
0 0

A study that CTV did an article on a short time ago said that alcohol was more harmful than heroin or cocaine it makes no sense to have a dangerous drug like alcohol legal & have less harmful drugs illegal. Portugal decriminalized all drugs in 2001 & it has been a huge success, we need to go one step further & legalize everything.


Simple remedy
said
0 0

The answer is a simple one for people who have character and backbone to deal with the issue head on instead of cowering from it. Institute capital punishment for drug trafficking in hard narcotics. A life for a life ruined. That's a fair and just reward. Too bad these on the looney left who occupy positions on these commissions don't understand any common sense. Now they want to legalize drugs. How stupid is that really? Totally mind boggling.


Reece
said
0 0

You can always have drugs delivered to your home faster than a pizza pie. ALWAYS. The only reason why drugs are illegal is because it creates jobs for lawyers, police, judges, insurance agencies and producers. When drugs are legalized a large number of these people will be out of jobs. The flip side is that people will stop getting killed. Robberies will fall. Prostitutes who are in the trade to support their habits will no longer allow themselves to be exploited. The reason why you are confused about why this prohibition is still in place is because of lawyers who become politicians and tell you they are doing us a favour. They are not doing anyone a favour but only enriching themselves. I haven't met a decent lawyer in my life or one that could seemlessly articulate a comprehensive solution to the never ending war. There is no common sense in their approach but they will pretend they have. It's simply a lie.


Not a drug user
said
0 0

Keeping drugs illegal, is a money maker for the US. If it wasn't profitable for someone, it would have been legalized along time ago.


Thergood Jenkins
said
0 0

Up with Hope and Down with Dope!!! .... Alright one more real quick.... But she's looking.


Matt in NB
said
0 0

God Bless Kofi Annan! That man should run the world.


Henry
said
0 0

This is alcohol prohibition all over again. The only way they ended the warfare then was to legalize and regulate the booze. This is the only way to end the drug violence today.The only people who win with the drug ban are the rich who control the drug trade.


Ryan, Guelph
said
0 0

So because some people are too stupid to realize the long term damage hard drugs has on their bodies and minds, we should legalize it so people who are curious, but afraid of breaking the law can make the same mistakes? [sarcasm] Brilliant... because what we need is more people seeking treatment for drug abuse, because it's ADDICTING and you can't stop on your own.[/sarcasm] Who pays these commissions?


Pat Ottawa
said
0 0

Its about time someone publicly stood up to say this.How many billions of dollars have been wasted trying to stop people from using drugs??? The only winner in the war against drugs is the black market.


Tom in Calgary
said
0 0

Thank goodness this is an international commission or our government would shut them down and discredit them personally. They may still go after the individual members but the commission will continue to do their work. One thing that is clear is that the current approach does not work. It inflates police budgets and directs money where it has been doing little good. If our government can stand it, let's have a serious debate and look for alternatives to this serious problem.


Jim in the West
said
0 0

When you consider that we have been fighting this "war" for decades now, and by all accounts there is no end in sight, perhaps a new approach is in order. Either we take the gloves off and fight with a determination to win last seen in World War II, or we look at a process of destruction through assimilation.


scott nova scotia
said
0 0

This same commision should help the military advisors figure out the wars we are involved in are also unwinable. Oh I forgot Libya does not count though, that is not a "REAL" war.


Shauna from St. Paul, Alberta
said
0 0

If "Drug addiction is a disease that can be successfully prevented and treated" as Rafael Lemaitre stated, then the answer isn't to throw drug users in jail (as happens even in Canada, and will happen even more under the Conservative plan). The answer is not to treat drug users as criminals, but to provide treatment. As for decriminalizing drugs, I completely agree. Organized crime wouldn't be able to benefit from it anymore (or as much) which would decrease crime, and jails wouldn't be so overcrowded with people that don't deserve to be there in the first place.


boy
said
0 0

The authorities need to step it up a notch - ask for help from the U.S and Canada .. otherwise all three nations will be in this mess ..


mark
said
0 0

yet these same people think that banning guns will solve gun crime, and that the 'war on poverty; is winnable. Go figure.


joe
said
0 0

That would be real smart. Leagalize it so it becomes acceptable. I can hear my kids telling me what's the problem its perfectly legal


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Top Stories

Labour Minister Lisa Raitt appears on CTV's Power Play on Monday, May 28, 2012.

Federal government orders end to CP Rail strike

More   51 Comments 51    11 Video(s) 11

Dominic and Abby Maryk were found in Mexico four years after allegedly being abducted by their father.

Extradition sought in Winnipeg missing children case

More   4 Comments 4    3 Video(s) 3

Protesters opposing Quebec student tuition fee hikes demonstrate in Montreal, Sunday, May 27, 2012. (Graham Hughes / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Quebec, students resume talks on tuition hikes

More   26 Comments 26    1 Video(s) 1