Top Stories -   

1

Dermatologists dismiss sunscreen worries

Bernadine Boyce, right, of Allentown, Pa., applies sunscreen to Bruno Barber, 5, of Atlantic City, as his mom, Natalia Barber, watches in Atlantic City, N.J., in this June 9, 2006, file photo. (AP Photo/Mary Godleski, File) Various sunscreen products are seen in Washington, Wednesday, May 26, 2010. (AP / Evan Vucci) Sun screen
Bernadine Boyce, right, of Allentown, Pa., applies sunscreen to Bruno Barber, 5, of Atlantic City, as his mom, Natalia Barber, watches in Atlantic City, N.J., in this June 9, 2006, file photo. (AP Photo/Mary Godleski, File)

View Larger Image

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (19) Facebook   

Date: Sunday May. 29, 2011 4:18 PM ET

Dermatologists are kicking sand in the face of two reports that claim two common sunscreen ingredients aren't safe for use.

The Environmental Working Group along with the influential consumer magazine, Consumer Reports, both recently released ratings of the best and worst sunscreen on the markets. And both warned that many sunscreens contain dangerous ingredients.

But dermatologists say the worries are overblown.

"The problem (with these reports) is they get people scared about using sun protection," Dr. Lisa Kellett tells CTV.ca.

The Environmental Working Group warns that many sunblocks are "filled with problematic ingredients, unsubstantiated marketing claims and lack-luster protection." The group advised that consumers avoid products that contain retinyl palmitate, a vitamin A derivative that isn't a sunblock but is often added to sunscreens as an antioxidant and to prevent skin aging.

EWG says rather than protecting the skin, studies suggest the ingredient might actually increase the risk of skin cancer.

Consumer Reports also warned that almost every product it tested contained ingredients linked to "adverse health effects in animal studies." It, too, singled out retinyl palmitate.

"As a precaution, pregnant women might want to choose sunscreens without the ingredient," the magazine recommended.

But the American Academy of Dermatology was quick to issue a response to say the reports are wrong, and that sunscreens contain ingredients that are safe and effective.

It said there have been no reliable studies conducted on humans that have found any problems with retinyl palmitate. The only studies that have raised worries have either been conducted in vitro (in test tubes) or on mice.

Topical and oral retinoids (vitamin A products) are commonly prescribed to treat a number of skin diseases, such as acne and psoriasis, and, the AAD added, oral retinoids are often used to prevent skin cancers in some patients.

Kellett, who runs the Toronto dermatology clinic DLK on Avenue, agrees that retinyl palmitate is safe, particularly in topical forms.

"You would have to ingest -- and I mean swallow -- enough retinyl palmitate to reach vitamin A-poisoning levels, to reach the point where you could harm a fetus ... And that would be almost impossible to do with a topical application," she said.

As for another ingredient often found in sunscreens, oxybenzone, which the EWG calls a hormone-disrupter, Kellett says once again, there have been no peer-reviewed studies that have found the ingredient unsafe. Both she and the AAD note that oxybenzone has been used for decades without problems.

"You would think we would have seen something (a problem) by now," Kellett said.

She said reports like the ones released this week only lead to misinformation and fears about sunscreen. Instead of worrying about theoretical risks of sunscreen ingredients, Canadians should really be more afraid of skin cancer.

"The risk of skin cancer is very, very high compared to the risk of using any of these drugs," says Kellett.

"There will be about 80,000 cases of skin cancer this year. That's a lot of cases."

While Kellett feels assured that sunscreens are safe and effective, she says people should never have a false sense of protection from them, noting that sunscreens are just one way to avoid sun damage and skin cancer. Sun lovers still should wear a hat and sun-protective clothing when they can, as well seek shade in middle of day.

So how should consumers find the best sunscreens?

The first step is to look for a product that has a DIN, a drug identification number, or a NPN, a Natural Product Number, Kellett advised.

"That means it's been registered by Health Canada and they've approved the ingredients," she said.

Kellett said there are a surprising number of sunscreens that find their way into Canada that have not been approved.

Consumers should also look for products that promise broad spectrum coverage, meaning they protect from both UVA and UVB light. The Canadian Dermatology Association also offers these tips:

  • Look for a product with a minimum SPF of 30
  • People allergic to sunscreens should look for products labelled "chemical-free." These usually contain titanium dioxide and zinc oxide, which reflect rather than absorb the sun's rays
  • Apply sunscreen about 20-30 minutes before sun exposure, to allow the active ingredients to bond to your skin
  • A second application 20 minutes later will maximize the protection
  • Reapply every two hours or after swimming or sweating a lot
  • Use a minimum SPF 30 lip balm
  • Sunscreens chemicals eventually break down, so don't not use a product after its expiry date.

Comments are now closed for this story

Paul ~ Kitchener
said
0 0

If one sticks to the shade, wear big brim hats in the sun, and don't lay for hours under the direct sun - THEN - you have no problem. I have fair skin, and respected the sun for 70 years, & I enjoy the sun under an umbrella, or tree, and "Skin Cancer" will never be mine, but, any other of thousands of cancers, may take me out of this existance. "CHEMICALS KILL" (in all forms).


Chris
said
0 0

HA... look at all the thumbs down to people who have never used sunscreen in their lives and do not have skin cancer. Those who cast the thumbs down need to grow up and stop being so wimpy. We are a living species that NATURALLY evolves to our surroundings. Why should we put these stupid chemicals on our bodies when the products harmfully inhibit this NATURAL process of evolution. I go golfing almost every day. I keep my vulnerable areas protected with clothing, while maintaining a good tan on my exposed areas NATURALLY. Sunscreen is worse for you than the sun is!!!


Paul
said
0 0

WOW….Amazing how some many people bought into the sun scare message. Funny how the most dangerous skin cancers form in places where the sun doesn’t shine such as the arm pits, bottom of your feet…. We all learned as kids that soil, water and SUN are the building blocks of life yet so many fear the sun. How many people realize that the Sun Scare message drives one of the biggest industries in the world? Sun Screen and Anti-Sun products are an industry big enough and generate revenue larger than most countries. The main stream women’s magazines container over a $1,000,000 of anti-sun and sun screen advertisements each month. Wonder why so many people are scared of the sun?


Where There's Smoke
said
0 0

Sorry, the dermatologist is just offering an opinion, he has no idea what the effect of long term exposure is - he has no idea - he's just guessing. I say stay away from unproven chemicals Period. Of course there weren't any human studies nobody is going to spend $250 Mil to bring a 5 dollar screen on the market. Humans have been exposed to sunlight for thousands of years and sun light is health and necessary (Vitamin D3). Use you head, take sun in a little at a time, and cover up or use an umbrella. If you need protection I suggest zinc oxide or titanium oxide based (non toxic) screens. I do not and will not trust anyone's opinion when it comes to my health. I will not put chemical based screens on my body because a Dr says it's okay. Nobody knows how safe or dangerous any of these synthesized chemicals are - nobody! They told us tobacco was safe and it was safe to smoke in air planes. Then they said oops I was wrong. Too late!


Don't confuse me with facts...
said
0 0

Once again an environmental group flies in the face of scientists in the know and publishes their own fear mongering BS. I just lost a friend to skin cancer that started on his back, a place most people neglect to apply sunscreen because you need a partner to do it for you. Dear environmental groups...just sit down and be quiet. Thank you.


Ivan
said
0 0

My friends use to laugh when I would wear a hat, sit under an umbrella, and wear spf 60. Now 20 years later, those laughs have resulted in major wrinkles and laugh lines. And here I am with great, smooth skin that people constantly compliment. I guess that last laugh is mine.


Kathleen
said
0 0

Most of the sunscreens are known to contain ingredients which themselves cause cancer - that is what the Environmental Working Group is trying to educate people about and trying to get the industry to change. A number of the ingredients, like those found in many beautycare products, ARE harmful to humans and yet they're still being allowed to use them because these industries, for the most part, are not held accountable - that in and of itself is scary. Once I started educating myself about these harmful chemicals I reduced down my exposure to products containing them - including sunscreen. I too grew up in the era of no sunscreen and have excellent skin. New studies show that its more important the food that you put into your body that helps protect you against skin and other cancers than topically applying products which contain some products which 'may' help protect us but which are also known to contain products which are known to harm us, i.e. cause cancer including skin cancer.


David H.
said
0 0

The American Academy of Dermatology is allopathically aligned. Of course they claim that sunscreen is safe. This article is unconvincing. Avoid the controversy. Supplement with Astaxanthin, a natural algae that salmon eat, which gives them strength, a pink or red colour and complete protection from the sun. 4 to 12 mg. per day is all you need. Zero toxicity.


Jim - North Saanich, BC
said
0 0

I have known three individuals who have succumbed to melanoma in the last few years. As I recall, none of them were proponents of using sunscreen until it was too late. Given the comparative risks of using sunscreen to those of developing skin cancer by not using it, I'll gladly accept the advice of dermatologists at least for now.


Old Ted
said
0 0

I have read that sunscreens let the harmful cancer causing rays through while blocking the helpful rays that create vitamin D in your body. Sounds to me like many of the potions and lotions on the store shelves are totally worthless.


Syl
said
0 0

I agree with Barny. I was raised on a farm and as a kid, on the first warm, spring day, the shirt was off and the shorts were on. I have never used sun screan in my life and I have no signs of skin cancer. I too, get a nice tan, without ever burning and I am fairly light skined. I am 76 years of age.


Skin Cancer - Ottawa
said
0 0

I for one having fair skin always had some form of sunscreen on..since then they have come out with better sunscreens..I know deet is not good for anyone especially children...I believe myself that putting sunscreen on the clothing around a very small child is better then having it on their skin too close to their mouths. If it's too hot stay out of the sun or cover up and drink a lot of fluid...Went for small bumps on the tops of my ears and was told they are surfers bumps..brother had the same but his doctor removed them before they turn to cancer. so what do you do...get a second opinion I suppose.


joyce
said
0 0

I have worn sunscreen for about 60 years, and people say i have a nice complexion.


Rosanna
said
0 0

I suppose its just common sense, use sunscreen or pay the consequences later, you can sit out and enjoy the sun just be smart about it!!


Barney
said
0 0

I too grew up in the era of no sunscreen,and as yet I have NEVER used any type of sunscreen protection. Guess what, I not only don't have skin cancer, I tan nicely every year. I am more afraid of what those chemicals soaking into your body will do after 25 years than I am of the sun.


AB Mom
said
0 0

I don't understand why they can't make all sunscreens without these chemicals? Last summer when I was carrying my first child, I went to put on my sunscreen, and found that I had a reaction to my normal sunscreen, it happened to contain oxybenzone. When a woman is pregnant, her body rejects all sorts of things that are harmful .. I didn't want coffee or chocolate (two of my favorite things) that happen to not be good for baby.. so obviously this chemical isn't good either.


Mintie
said
0 0

It angers me that reports like that come out everyday!!!! I call them, fear mongers. This is irresponsible! Shame on those people who like to spread fear for the sake of selling prints!


MikefromQuebec
said
0 0

I'm not an expert, never claimed to be, but to me, putting a chemical product on your skin, made by a corporation whose sole reason for existence is to make money, which is designed to block out the source of all life on planet earth seems a little foolish. Put that together with the fact that one of the leading companies selling the stuff, is also the company that used to sell a product that was meant to enhance the sun's effect, and you really have to wonder. I also wonder why you never really heard of epidemics of skin cancers until after people started putting these products on their skin.


duncan
said
0 0

I grew up in the NO sunscreen era of the sixties and seventies. For the last five years I have battled a stubborn spot of skin cancer, which I think, after extensive surgery is gone. My twin brother wore sunscreen twenty years ago and I MOCKED him. Guess who is laughing now. He has no skin cancer. You choose but when they are cutting your nose off to get rid of cancer or parts of your face, ask yourself: Would I wear sunscreen if I knew this was preventable? And PEOPLE, we are not plants so testing on animals or plants is duh.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Top Stories

Labour Minister Lisa Raitt appears on CTV's Power Play on Monday, May 28, 2012.

Federal government orders end to CP Rail strike

More   51 Comments 51    11 Video(s) 11

Dominic and Abby Maryk were found in Mexico four years after allegedly being abducted by their father.

Extradition sought in Winnipeg missing children case

More   4 Comments 4    3 Video(s) 3

Protesters opposing Quebec student tuition fee hikes demonstrate in Montreal, Sunday, May 27, 2012. (Graham Hughes / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Quebec, students resume talks on tuition hikes

More   26 Comments 26    1 Video(s) 1