News Sections
Greyhound victim's mother concerned for Li's future
Selected Comment
This shows the flaws in our system. (1) either this guy is a brutal killer or (2) he is absolutely insane. either way he should never see the light of day again. The rights and safety of the public far outweigh his rights.
scott nova scotia
Greyhound victim's mother concerned for Li's future
talking about
Greyhound victim's mother concerned for Li's future
Geoff Nixon, CTV News
Date: Saturday May. 21, 2011 2:42 PM ET
If not this time around, it could happen next time.
That's the fear Carol de Delley holds about the potential release of Vince Li, the man who beheaded her son, Tim McLean, on a Greyhound bus nearly three years ago.
May 30 will mark the third time de Delley has attended a review board hearing for Li, who was found not criminally responsible for her son's death.
But de Delley is determined to make her voice heard and to bring attention to the fact that Li is slowly gaining more freedom while in custody.
Last year, a review board ruled that Li could take escorted walks around the mental health facility where he is being held. To de Delley, granting such a privilege to Li is the first step towards his future release, a scenario she said she believes would inevitably put public safety in jeopardy.
"I don't believe that he will ever be cured. Managed, controlled, but never cured," de Delley told CTV.ca in a recent telephone interview from her Elie, Man., home.
While she doesn't expect that Li's therapists will push to have him released at this point, de Delley predicts they will ask the board to loosen restrictions on him.
"Now that they've upgraded the facilities to allow him these strolls and they've hired two more highly paid professionals to accompany him on these strolls, I think they'll be asking for a little bit more freedom for him," said de Delley.
The yearly rite of attending a review board hearing and entering a victim impact statement isn't helping her heal, de Delley said, but it is necessary if she wants to play a role in preventing Li from returning to society one day.
"I don't believe that the victim's family should be the one sentenced to having to relive this on an annual basis," de Delley said.
This year's hearing comes at a particularly stressful time for de Delley, as she has recently been preparing for possible flooding at her Manitoba home. Her residence is one of the dozens that were on alert in Manitoba for intentional flooding of farmland in the Portage la Prairie area.
"In comparison to what we've already experienced, this is nothing," de Delley said, referring to the flood.
In the long run, de Delley hopes to push for legal changes that will require people found not criminally responsible of violent crimes to stay locked up.
"These are very, very dangerous, violent killers and they need to be treated as such," she said.
"I think that the humane thing to do is to treat them, to medicate them. But behind locked doors for the rest of their natural lives. Otherwise everybody out there is in jeopardy once they're released."
User Tools
Related Stories
Most Popular
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
If 5000 jobs can be so vital to the nation's economy, they should get what they ask for in bargaining. Simple.
Email
Comments are now closed for this story
Loiuise
said
Joel Schulz
said
If Li is stabilized, and only if, then he should be given an opportunity to re-integrate with supervision. However, the period between being stabilized and release should be long enough to ascertain that it is for the long term.
Philip V Windosr
said
Dean H
said
And contrary to what some of you believe, it is rarely accepted as a defence in practice. We are not a society of revenge. That is not what the correctional system is about. We do not live in medieval times. comments regarding executing people who have mental illness and commit crimes is as barbaric as the crime that is being discussed in this forum. Educate yourselves Canadians..
Dorian
said
question for intheknow
said
Crone
said
As a mother I am appalled when I see mentally ill people who have committed atrocious crimes or at high risk to reoffend pedophiles allowed back into society (often with a note in the newspaper so the people of the community know the guy is back). Why? So our innocent children can be targeted? Sorry... once you have murdered, maimed or sexually assaulted someone I believe YOUR freedom should be ended in order to protect others. And maybe, as an inmate, you can work to maintain yourself...garden etc. so we dont spend so much $ on you instead of our children and aging parents.
Mark
said
dante vancouver
said
Elmer in BC
said
PIerre D.
said
Adam
said
Alex
said
Barbara
said
Greg K.
said
K in Manitoba
said
In the know
said
Truly compassion must be considered for the victims but there is more than one person or group of persons who are the victim in these situations of violent crime. Treating persons found NCR or Unfit for trial due to a mental disorder is not simply a case of "getting away with it". In truth these individuals can serve periods of incarceration far lengthier than if they had been found guilty of a crime. Risk Assessment, treatment and re-integration into the community is a long road with many steps of progression(often very small and lengthy times between steps) - it works and it is supported by the laws of this country. I offer up that you educate yourselves about mental illness, crime and recedivism before we as a society assume that all these individuals found NCR deserve to be locked up and "never see daylight again"
Rachael
said
mac ontario
said
Marg from Med Hat
said
Brie
said
Christina
said
Gerry from m.b. but not n.d.p.
said
Marcia
said
CG in NB
said
Ron J.
said
Miranda
said
Diane
said
Larry I Ontario
said
CMB
said
Rroneill
said
Jack
said
Tom Hanna
said
scott nova scotia
said
spaz
said
JPC from Sask
said
meghan
said
Kathy
said
Donaldbain
said
Caper
said
Frank Buchan
said