Top Stories -   

1
Stephen Harper delivers a speech at a campaign event in Guelph Ont., on Monday, April 4, 2011. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS) Stephen Harper takes part in a campaign event on a farm in Wainfleet Ont., on Monday, April 4, 2011. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS) Stephen Harper takes part in a campaign event on a farm in Wainfleet, Ont., on Monday, April 4, 2011. (Sean Kilpatrick /  THE CANADIAN PRES) Stephen Harper re-pledges to abolish to the gun registry during a campaign stop in Wainfleet, Ont., Monday, April 4, 2011.

Harper says he won't revisit abortion, gay marriage

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV National News: Roger Smith on Harper
Stephen Harper chose his audience well to deliver the familiar message about abolishing the long gun registry. But it was another issue that dogged him all day.
CTV News: Scott Laurie on the election campaign
Rifles and arithmetic were dominant themes on the campaign trail Monday as the Conservatives reiterated a promise to cancel the gun registry. They also issued a 'show me the money' challenge to the Liberals on the real cost of their platform.
Power Play: Wendy Cukier and Tony Bernardo
8:00 p.m. ET: The president of the Coalition of Gun Control says the long-gun registry is important to keep guns away from dangerous people. The executive director of the Canadian Institute for Legislative Action says it doesn't work because only half of Canada's guns are registered.
CTV Southwestern Ontario: Art Baumunk reports
Prime Minister Stephen Harper was in Guelph, Ont. Monday, in what is expected to be one of many area visits during the campaign.
CTV News Channel: Stephen Harper in Wainfleet
Stephen Harper has promised once again to abolish the long run registry. He says the Tories stands with farmers and hunters and the registry is a waste of money. He says those who support it, thinks it can help control gun crime, but Harper says that is not so.
Power Play: Candice Hoeppner and Peter Stoffer
5:00 p.m. ET: Conservative MP Candice Hoeppner says people are extremely angry with NDP MP Peter Stoffer's decision to oppose the long-gun registry. Stoffer says his constituents asked him to vote according to their wishes, and that is what he did.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (89) Facebook   

Stephen Harper delivers a speech at a campaign event in Guelph Ont., on Monday, April 4, 2011. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS) Stephen Harper takes part in a campaign event on a farm in Wainfleet Ont., on Monday, April 4, 2011. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS) Stephen Harper takes part in a campaign event on a farm in Wainfleet, Ont., on Monday, April 4, 2011. (Sean Kilpatrick /  THE CANADIAN PRES) Stephen Harper re-pledges to abolish to the gun registry during a campaign stop in Wainfleet, Ont., Monday, April 4, 2011.

Photos

Stephen Harper delivers a speech at a campaign event in Guelph Ont., on Monday, April 4, 2011. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

View Larger Image

Date: Mon. Apr. 4 2011 8:59 PM ET

Prime Minister Stephen Harper said a majority Conservative government would not move to ban abortions or gay marriage.

During a campaign stop Monday in Welland, Ont., where he renewed his commitment to abolish the long gun registry, Harper was asked if he would revisit either issue if he wins a majority.

"We will govern on the platform we are elected on," he said.

"On the other matters you mention (abortion and gay marriage), they are not in the Conservative platform. I have no intention of opening up those issues."

With a CTV/Globe and Mail poll showing the Tories with a 14-point lead over the Liberals, there's open speculation about a Conservative majority.

In the two previous elections, Conservatives have flirted with majority-type numbers in the polls, but were never able to sustain those numbers come election day.

The suspicion that the Conservatives harbour a secret agenda on social issues has plagued Harper in the past, an issue the party wants to put to bed.

Harper did not say whether he would support a private member's bill on the social issues. He voted against a private member's bill last year that would have criminalized coercing a woman into having an abortion.

Speaking in Ontario's agricultural heartland Monday, Harper renewed his commitment to abolish the long gun registry, calling the program an example of how the opposition "simply doesn't get it."

Harper said the Liberal-created program targets law-abiding hunters while doing nothing to stop criminals.

"They actually think that you can control gun crime in Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver by being soft on criminals who use guns, but enforcing a long gun registry on duck hunters and farmers in rural Canada," he said during a campaign stop at a grain farm in Wainfleet, Ont.

The Conservatives are hoping to recapture the riding from New Democrat Malcolm Allen -- an MP who voted against a Conservative motion to abolish the long-gun registry, after originally supporting it.

Harper, speaking with a backdrop of supporters sitting on hay bales, blamed the failed bill on opposition parties, which he said ignored the wishes of rural voters.

"It is a question of whether or not you get it," Harper said.

"Ignatieff, the NDP and Bloc Quebecois coalition simply doesn't get it."

Harper said a majority Conservative government would make the registry's cancellation a top priority.

"Our Government has long opposed the wasteful and ineffective long-gun registry," he said. "We must stop targeting law-abiding gun owners, and instead focus our resources on real criminals."

Harper said a Conservative government would also create a hunting and wildlife advisory panel that would bring "common sense" back to Ottawa, on rural issues.

Manitoba Conservative MP Candice Hoeppner, who introduced the private member's bill that would have killed the registry, said Monday the Tories are the only party committed to the move, which voters should consider come election day.

"The choice is very clear. There is only one party that supports ending the long-gun registry. That is the Conservative Party, that's Prime Minister Stephen Harper and Conservative MPs," Hoeppner told CTV's Power Play. "So that's the reality for Canadians and for gun owners and their families in this election."

Hoeppner accused Halifax NDP MP Peter Stoffer, who, like Allen, initially supported her bill but changed his vote, of betraying voters in his riding.

Stoffer said despite his support for abolishing the registry, he changed his vote according to his constituents' wishes.

Stoffer said he would prefer to see changes to the registry, "but I have to answer to my constituents, and my constituents clearly asked me to maintain the registry and make some changes if possible, and that's exactly what I did."

Stoffer also suggested that the Tories could have scrapped the registry by including a provision in any of the federal budgets from 2006 to the one introduced earlier this year, but instead left the issue for election campaigns to drum up money from supporters. Hoeppner said adding the issue to a budget would have been unsuccessful in a minority government.

MPs want focus on jobs

Allen, who won the Ontario riding by a mere 300 votes in 2008, attended a Tory photo op later Monday and criticized Harper for focusing on the registry issue.

"Clearly the prime minister has come today to talk about the gun issue," Allen said. "I'm here to basically talk about what's really important to Canadians, which is jobs."

Welland has endured economic hardship in recent years, including the closing of a John Deere plant, which put 800 people out of work. Allen blamed local job losses on the Conservatives' commitment to lowering corporate taxes.

"We have watched free trade bleed this economy in the Niagara region and especially in southern Ontario and they want to give us more of that," Allen said.

Stoffer echoed Allen's comments Monday, telling Power Play that he wished the prime minister had discussed issues such as job creation in a riding with so many people out of work.

"It's interesting that Mr. Harper is in Welland, with a high unemployment rate. And the issue, I would assume, for a whole lot of those unemployed people is not just the gun registry, it's also where to get a job, how do I look after my family and things of that nature," Stoffer said. "And I wish that that was what Mr. Harper would be talking about as well."

During the Welland event, Harper was also asked about new revelations about former senior staffer Bruce Carson.

The Canadian Press revealed Monday that Carson was convicted on five counts of fraud -- three more than previously known -- and received court-ordered psychiatric treatment before coming to work as one of Harper's top advisers.

Harper said the convictions were related to events that took place long before Carson came to work for him, and that when he did he was a respected man in Ottawa.

However, Harper said it's clear the system for background checks needs to be improved.

The Conservative leader is scheduled to spend Monday night in Quebec.

Comments are now closed for this story

Joe
said

Police departments have said it helps. I can't wrap my mind around people getting all up about their rights when something has helped saved somebody's life. My apologies but saving even one life is worth the apparent hassel of people registering their guns.


Jason
said

As a Gay person - I'm very happy with Prime Minister Harper moving on and not touching Gay Marriage. I like him as a leader and will vote for him. I think he offers Canadians 'stability" in unstable times. And plus he and his wife are good to stray cats in Ottawa..so that in my books is an added bonus since I love cats too.


charlie
said

Slimy comment. He'll say anthing to get more votes.

Katherine
said

Harper's government tried to get rid of the long gun registry. But, with a minority government they were voted down. Any criminal can get a gun if they want one. Why should all the honest Canadians have to go through all of this foolishness to have a hunting gun in their home. It's a control issue and a way to get more money.


JA Bruneau - Courtenay
said

Yes folks, we can take that to the bank! Mr. Harper once said that if he had a majority government - we wouldn't recognize Canada in 4 years. Same sex marriage is just one small bump in the road.


Rob from Sask
said

I registered my gun. I don't get what the big deal is?


cmf5
said

Wake up..... this guy cannot be trusted. The nose is growing longer and longer.


TIm From Calgary
said

It's a form people. Fill it out!


jerry
said

STEVE will not look at GAY weddings or abortions until he gets a majority then undo the lies and all is on the table. Don't belive a thing that he says.

cfnebear
said

It's because he has a limit when talking to the media of only 5 lies per day.


Slim
said

All guns should be registered.


Mike
said

In my opinion, anyone who supports the LGR clearly does not understand it. Saying that the LGR saves lives is equivalent to saying car registrations stop speeding. It is just not the case. Instead of focusing on criminals, who obviously do not register their guns, it turns law abiding citizens into possible criminals.And as for the people who claim that the LGR was created after a tragic incident (the Polytechnique massacre) to stop further incidents from occurring. Please take a close look at the Mayerthorpe incident, which involved a criminal and an unregistered prohibited long gun.


Margie
said

@ Ken from BC: The Conservatives have tried to ditch the costly and wasteful Long Gun Registry and the opposition parties both switched their votes, on the third reading, and the legislation did not pass. In order to get rid of the long gun registry we need a Conservative majority government. The LGR is a expensive waste of tax dollars - proven over and over again that is does nothing to reduce crime and only penalizes law abiding farmers, sport target shooters and hunters. Conservatives have made efforts but, impossible to pass any policies and good legislation because of the disruptions and distractions by the NDP, Liberal & Bloc parties.


Tom in Calgary
said

He won't but you want to bet a private member's bill is already written. We know this man's word is never quite what it seems.


Prof. Sine Curve
said

Those of us who remember the time when the Liberals first passed the gun registry law recall that they said it would cost only $2 million in total. Right now the cost stands at over $1.2 billion (600 times what they promised). Please excuse me for wondering how much Iggy's almost-daily billion dollar goodies announcements would end up costing us.


Jane (ON)
said

The Liberals are in full panic mode, every news web site that I have looked at including this one seems to have a major influx of blogs that reek of venom and slander directed at the conservatives and Harper (the Red Tent electoral tactic for many years). I can't wait for the election. I wonder how they are going to react when Harper retains the title of PM again.


John
said

It is Mr. Harper that doesn't get it. This went to a vote in his tenure as PM and was defeated. Democracy in action, but Mr. Harper will keep at it until he gets the answer he wants. He is acting like a spoiled child who hasn't got his way yet.


robinhud
said

Dictator Harper. Thinks Canadian voters are stupid........or don't care......enough with the gun registry!!


Stan Dawson
said

I think we need a registry of Liberals. That way we know where to find you when we have to.


Vanc Guy
said

PM Harper is honest - no hidden agenda. Most 'sane' Canadians want to see this ridiculous waste of tax dollars gone with the Senate. It's not like people can go out and buy guns without controls - we already have a good system of regulation.


Remarkable
said

@ Jim in North Saanich BC. This registry before it was even imposed would allow police to come after anybody who they suspected of a crime who had a registered weapon. This was another typical Liberal bad idea, that did nothing more that put the average Canadian Law Abiding Citizen on a "watch list" so the government could keep tabs on who had weapons and which kind they were. This tool in fact would give the government and law enforcement agencies the right to confiscate your weapons if they felt that you were a danger to yourself or others. It is just another tool used by the Liberal government in its quest to disarm the population. In the meantime, illegal pistols being used by gangs and drug dealers are being used to kill and at times those who are killed are just innocent bystanders, walk around the streets waiting for the justice system to prove them guilty. What a joke!


Matt
said

KenfromBC:Actually, they've tried getting rid of it. In the latest attempt on Sept 23 2010 it was defeated in a vote of 153 to 151.Not trying to be an apologist for the Conservatives or anything (I'm not voting for them this time around), but to be fair, they did promise it, and they did try.The only other option to them over the last 5 years would have been to throw it in as a confidence measure somewhere, but it would be considered a "poison pill" and would have likely triggered an election earlier in that case.


Steve in Vancouver
said

The Conservatives are sticking with their promises and with a majority this registry will pass into history. As for the Liberals they are shooting blanks. Libs you need to bring more than crazy very costly promises to the voters. Your pop guns are shooting blanks. Time to kick all Liberals out of the country.


Freedom Lover from Regina
said

I hope the turncoat NDP/Lib members all lose their seats for not supporting the elimination of this taxpayers' boondoggle...it's a national disgrace...


firstMickey
said

Iggy is looking better all the time.


KenfromBC
said

If the CPC wanted rid of the LGR, why haven't they ditched it in the five years they've been in power?This is like all the promises Harper makes. They mean nothing. He's just using this issue to stir up the vote in rural and western ridings. But if he wins, he'll still sit on it like he always has.


Shan SK
said

Good perspective Mark. Good news - handguns are already considered restricted weapons and have a special license required. There are also serious restrictions on them as well - for example, they have tighter storage requirements and they can only be transported to and from a registered restricted range. So in effect, we already have the laws in place that you are looking for. Harper is just trying to get the long-gun registry removed, which in my opinion is a good thing to do. Putting someone in jail and giving them a permanent criminal record because they haven't registered their .22 gopher rifle is not appropriate. Cities can also impose additional constraints if they like, but we don't need a federal registry to do that.


Benny
said

I am a gun owner in Alberta and even though this may be a good thing, the private prisons, mandatory sentences, private UN agreements, the amero and Nafta agreements harper made behind Canadians backs is ENOUGH....I will never vote for someone who goes behind Canadians backs and even makes comments like "it doesnt matter what you think".....that is far more important than a 2 MINUTE step at the gun shop...


Prof. Pye Chartt
said

@ Niagara George: If neither common sense nor the FACT that no government or law enforcement agency in Canada has EVER demonstrated, statistically or empirically, that the Registry is genuinely effective in making Canadians significantly safer persuade you, as a staunch Liberal supporter with a, presumably, "liberal" appreciation for rational freedom, law, and order, kindly read the comment of "Jim - North Saanich, BC" below. It might also cause you to ponder why some police chiefs (acting, effectively, as hierarchical lobbyists), think that the Registry is a fine-and-dandy idea, despite the aforementioned FACT. Thanks.


Shayne
said

Over Regulation is not good. Causes problems with harassment and costs too much money and keeps police busy with things they shouldn't be preventing them from doing their jobs. 2 better ways to do it are ban guns all together for civilians for a safer future or stop the over regulation and the hunters won't be harassed and the police will be more effective. Either way is better than the current system that has shown to be ineffective.


Mark in Newmarket
said

Getting rid of the long gun registry isn't a priority, but it needs to be gone. It was a useless act imposed upon us by the Liberals that cost the tax payer billions of dollars. As far as I'm concerned, side arms such as pistols, restricted military weapons should be banned accept for those who have a special license issued by the government with strict restrictions in place. Really if I had it my way, all hand guns would be made illegal in Canada except for law enforcement and for the Military.


Gun registry a waste
said

The Conservatives are right again on the issue. My son is an undercover cop who deals with some very unsavory characters and he informs that the LGR is not used much. They can't rely on that information as its not accurate much of the time. I sure hope that Canada can get some peace and we elect a Conservative majority. I've had enough of the LPC spins, the false character assassinations, the bitter partisan politics and this wasteful lunge for power by Iggy and his MP's.


Gerry in Miami
said

Your Harper sounds like our G W Bush and you know where that got us!


Melanie Terrace,BC
said

This is not a divisive issue here.The LGR has to go,and almost everyone I know wants it gone now.For some voters,this will be the the ballot question. What this has to do with separatism in Quebec is beyond me.But if it's division that Damon is concerned about,he would do better to address western Canada.Having heard Bob Rae over the weekend,and his comments about getting a Liberal government involved in areas of provincial jurisdiction,I would think that cap and trade,and Alberta oil could be the divisive issue that the Liberals would bring to government. For what it's worth,health care and education fall within provincial jurisdictions.As does the ownership of non renewable resources.If the Liberals pick a fight with Alberta over their oil,I will stand with Alberta. I hope all Canadians in the west will do the same.


james
said

LGR, I really don't understand why so many seem to get all hot and bothered about signing a form that says you own a gun, I sure when auto license plates came out about 100 years ago it took a bunch of years before every car had one. Still after 100 years, there are cars driving around with fake plates. Enabling the police to better assist risk is a good thing. This LGR talk sounds more like Harper has no idea how to relate to country folk and is rehashing old passions


Niagara George
said

Great picture of the yawning kid in the background. I yawn too when Steve gets rolling on his gun registry nonsense. I had the pleasure of answering one of the Con telephone surveys about guns. Quite enlightening what they wanted to know. Also interesting that the law and order guy doesn't care about the police chiefs and their opinions. Some of us are experts at everything. We don't need advise from the professionals. The truth is that the Cons are willing to do or say anything to stay in power.


Hank
said

Oh boy, if Harper wanted to get rid of the long gun registry he would have done it by now. He is just using it as an opportunity to whip people up into a frenzy again and everyone is falling for it.

Ontario Taxpayer
said

The LGR only appeals to the urbanites....it gives them a warm fuzzy feeling that somethig is being done..when in actual fact it is a waste of money. Coming from a family of police officers and military members, I grew up with long guns. Respect for a fire arm is taught and handed down. I could not get my fFAC until I had successfully competed a Hunter Safety Course...and it was darn tough. On the police side of the family...they all say it is a waste of time..only the politically motivated cops use it as a crutch..a la William Blair. Get rid of it and put the money into health care....by the way..the health care debate is severly lacking in this election!


Brad M
said

Harper gov't was accused of being in contempt for not disclosing some costs.......well let me remind everyone what the Fiberals did when the rest of the house wanted to know the true cost of the gun registry......delay, delay, delay, then bam!.....over a billion dollars.


It's what it is
said

"The Registry is only a worthless billion-dollar, Liberal-created boondoggle that no government or law enforcement agency in Canada has EVER demonstrated, statistically or empirically, to be genuinely effective in making Canadians significantly safer" if your stupid enough to rule out the tremendous support from police forces across the nation, or listen to those who own long guns whine continuously like NRA advocates, or Conservatives who should invest more time worrying about the money wasted by Harper these past five years. Typical Conservative rhetoric always looks to the past to disguise the truth about how dangerous a Conservative future for Canada truly is! Let's hear about the issues affecting us now and in the next 4 years - that of course would excuse Harper.


Wendy
said

This is just another example of how Harper ignores all of the expert and scientific advice and just plows ahead with his ideological agenda.


Kevin from Oakville
said

I'm reading a lot that the registry is simply an information pool for criminals. This hasn't happened yet, and is most likely not to happen. It is far more common for criminals now to break into a house simply to steal guns. The criminals know that the guns are in the house through talk and rumours. Only an irresponsible person would "advertise" the fact that they have guns, making them a target for criminals. Such an irresponsible person is less likely to register their guns. Therefore, the registry is the perfect means to take away guns from these irresponsible individuals. You can think of the registry as a weeding process.


Tom, Kamloops
said

How much social good could we do with this money? I hate the LGR and wonder how much good we could have been doing with those funds.Also, we don't need it because all the iinfo on law-abiding info already exists (see the much earlier note from the programmer). If someone buys a licence to shoot ducks, we know they own at least one shotgun. A licence to shoot upland birds (grouse, etc), means a .22 or small shotgun. A licence to shoot deer means a medium rifle. A licence to shoot moose or elk means a large-bore rifle. The police don't need the serial numbers. They only need to know whether or not there are guns, and what type. Existing databases give them this.We don't need the LGR. We just need to share existing information.


Steve O
said

Harper is dragging this old chestnut out again. Pathetic, I guess he figures he doesn't have all the uneducated redneck votes he needs.


Metro
said

Yeah. 'Cos we have so little else of importance to discuss.I like the registry. It keeps guns out of the hands of some, though regrettably not all, idiots.The alternative is to allow guns to proliferate in our communities.But right now I'm more interested in what "I Make the Decisions" will do for Canada's jobless rate. And thus far I am not encouraged.


Jack - AB
said

So people would rather get rid of the gun registry? Does that mean criminals can then buy guns in Canada to commit their crimes? The registry will not stop all the gun crime out there but help to reduce it! If Canadians are buying guns for legal use then why are they so afraid to register them. The registry makes people secure & track their guns better (harder to steal) and avoids them being sold to just anybody like on the black market or to crazy people. It is one more tool for the police to use to solve crime. In fact, the registry was created to lower or eliminate gun crimes in Canada. The more info police have; the greater chance they'll solve the crime!


Mutt from Windsor
said

Harper again shows us why he is the only one qualified to lead Canadians thru the next 4 yrs. Ending waste, a favorite way of generating income for the Liberals such as the Registry and the Sponsorship scandal and Party subsidies is a great start. Using taxpayers funds wisely is the most important promise any political leader can make, and Harper is the only one to have the right stuff to fufill that promise.


S.A.S
said

As a registered gun owner in Ontario, I find the LGR not only a huge waste of money, but a nuisance to law-abiding gun owners as myself!For those of you that believe in the LGR, please remember this CRIMINALS WILL NEVER REGISTER A GUN! So tell me, how can you justify spending our tax dollars on a system that HAS NOT AND WILL NOT WORK? Criminals will always get guns and other weapons in any way possible with or without the LGR just the same. It just doesn't make sense, and it is in my experience that most people that believe in the LGR do not like hunters and do not understand anything about hunting or target shooting - that's your prerogative, but if you just think about the LGR, it does not make sense! Just another way for the Liberals to bring this BS in to try and make people think they're actually fighting crime! Needless to say, I'm voting Conservative, once again... hoping this is the last time - we need a Conservative majority!


Kevin
said

What the long gun registry does is take guns away from those who may be irresponsible. I' know of two incidents in my neighbourhood where the individuals were irresponsible with their guns, and because they didn't bother registering, the police took them away. Made me feel safer. True, implementing the gun registry initially was a waste of money, but it's running now and on only a few million dollars a year. There's no reason the government cannot keep the registry and also go after criminals. The two aren't intertwined.


Redneck Albertan
said

Funny how people call Mr. Harper a dictator and undemocratic when the man is the only leader we have had since Confederation who actually wants to INCREASE our level of freedom and not come up with more useless laws to restrict them. Last time I checked, dictators were somewhat averse to allowing their people to own firearms.


Paul
said

There are already a large number of database applications that could have been modified or retro fitted for this purpose , this looks more like a work make project for someone . The money wasted on this is unreal . As a programmer , I woud be ashamed to be involved in this .


m.mia
said

Conservative will get the majority if they stop talking about health care reform. Alternatively if they talk about improve instead of reform our votes are for conservatives. We do not want to see another bail out sector has been created by reforming health care system.


NRM
said

It's unfortunate that to this day some Canadians still do not understand what the gun registry actually is. So, here it is again, for all the partisans and people who think Echole Polytechnique wouldn't have happened if the registry was in place: the registry is a database to associate a firearm's serial number (or firearm identification number) with a name, address and phone number. It's nothing more than an expensive, glorified, shopping list for criminals. It's 100% and completely impossible for the long gun registry to prevent crime. Did it prevent the Dawson school shooting? No. Did it prevent the Mayerthorpe massacre? No.What prevents crime is the licencing, background checks, spousal safety concern hotline and mandatory safety testing that the Conservatives (gun owners) are adament be kept in place.At best the gun registry is a waste of money, at worst it's a shopping list for break and enter criminals if it falls into the wrong hands.


terrence w/
said

I now live in the city so have no reason to own a firearm. But I did when I grew up in a rural area. And, as a law-abiding citizen, I would have had no problem with registering my rifle. I like the idea that police can immediately know if a firearm is legal or not. What's with all this fear of registering a legal firearm by law-abiding citizens?


criordon
said

While the long-gun registry may not prevent criminals from acquiring firearms, it does allow police to verify whether there are registered weapons at an address when responding to a call. The registry is in place and relatively inexpensive to maintain, so why get rid of it?The Harper mentality puzzles me. Between this idea and the plan for more prisons, what sort of society would Mr. Harper have us living in - Canadian or American?


Mike
said

Lets see there has been a registry for hand guns for years and yet the only ones who register are those law abidding citizens. How many illegal hand guns have the gang and guns units in Toronto Ottawa and Vancouver and the rest of the Country uncovered over the years, thousands YES THOUSANDS. Does it seem to be working, NO. Scrap the gun registery and beef up law enforcement. This is where the money should be spent.


Rob
said

Why they not change an Employment Standards to protect employees from employers who want to cheat employees. Employment contract and 1.5 for overtime.


Bernadette
said

Great job! Mr. Harper. Abolishing the gun registry is a good thing, because is just a waisting of money..


Terry Newman
said

I thought you media types were going to avoid provocative imagery. CROSSHAIRS. Oh my! Next thing you know there will be guns in the streets.


Jim - North Saanich, BC
said

The long gun registry does nothing to stop the illegal use of firearms and I have yet to meet a police officer who tells me it is of any use. In fact the Chief Constable of one major Canadian city has stated it is of so little use as to be a nuisance and that two billions dollars could have been far better spent on crime prevention programs, better policing and timely prosecutions. Instead we have placed every target shooter, duck hunter and gun collector on a police watch list while gangs of well armed thugs shoot up large metropolitan areas at will. The irony is that police do not need a search warrant to enter the home of anyone holding a firearms license and who posseses registered firearms and firearms can be confiscated without compensation on nothing more than the whim or suspicion of ANY police officer . There is almost no redress to the courts under the draconian provisions of current firearms laws. However, police do need a search warrant to enter the homes or businesses of known drug dealers, suspected terrorists and those who are otherwise known "outlaws". In fact if an individual is suspected to have a firearm but who does not have a license or known to be in possession of a registered firearm, police do need a warrant. but not so with an individual who has fully complied with the law. Worse, we now have a computer registry which can and has been hacked by the criminal element and the owner is more at fault under the law for having his firearms stolen than the perpetrator of the crime itself. We have the leaders of three political parties, LPC, NDP and BQ supporting all this.


Liberal
said

Liberals mismanaged the long gun registry just like they mismanaged the HRDC with $1 billion lost (to their friends?) Remember Liberals are "mismanagers" when you go to vote. They still owe taxpayers $40,000,000 dollars - when are we going to get paid for that Liberal "scamdal"? Scrap the LGR we don't "NEED" it.


George V.
said

The gun registry shouldn't have been implemented in the first place. It has cost the tax payers millions of dollars without any positive results. Innocent people were treated as criminals like farmers, skeat shooters, gun collectors, target shooting clubs as in Toronto were targetted. The criminals have the unregistered weapons and using them with impunity. I am not a gun owner or collector, as a citizen I can see the folly of this whole registry fiasco.


Damon
said

More divisive politics by Harper, big surprise. All his POSITIVE promises don't take affect until (OR IF) they balance the books. Everything else is just negative split the country politics. Maybe he'll even bring up Quebec separation next, that's always a good wound to poor salt in.


Tim - Calgary
said

For the defenders of the registry: Can one of you please point out one single solitary case where the registry actually stopped a crime before it was committed? I haven't heard of a single case of the registry stopping a crime, have you? As far as I understand it, criminals don't register their weapons, do they? Only the law abiding citizen does and they are then turned into criminals if they don't register their lawfully owned weapons.


doug4711
said

There is absolutely no reason, whatsoever, that a weapon of any kind shouldn't be registered.What is the big deal here?For those who feel a real need for a gun, go and get one and then register it!Then you need to go and get yourself registered!Nobody really needs guns.Especially the podunk rubes in the Alabama Cadillacs out drinking beer out of a bag, shooting at highway signs and small defenseless animals.


Dennis Schoonbaert
said

The long gun registry does serve a purpose and the cost of running it is not that great, unlike the cost of setting it up - it should stay in place. Name one good outcome from the G8 G20 Summit - now that was a waste. Pure and simple this is a wedge issue for Harper, that's all it is!


Scott MacKay
said

The Police across Canada want the LGR and they say it works.


Arne
said

That's it all Canada's problems will be solved with this registry gone! All those who think that give your heads a shake please. It is so pathetic that with things the way they are our government is focused on this as a solution. the money spent on this is way less than the Conservatives will spend getting elected.


Fred N Ont
said

I see a nothing but nonsense in making laws based on one incident as in the long gun registry and the small boating license.We need stronger sensible laws properly enforced and petty silly laws dropped. As in the Conservative agenda.


scottns
said

This is the first thing I have heard Harper say that really makes sense. I guess maybe all hope is not lost.


Andre
said

Of course criminal don't register thier guns, so what's the point of this billion dollar and counting scam?


Prof. Pye Chartt
said

The Registry is a worthless billion-dollar, Liberal-created boondoggle that no government or law enforcement agency in Canada has EVER demonstrated, statistically or empirically, to be genuinely effective in making Canadians significantly safer. Had it not been for the disingenuousness, dishonesty, partisanship, and blatant hypocrisy of those Liberal and NDP MPs who previously voted in favor of scrapping the worthless Registry but, suddenly, decided to play "gotcha" politics with the kill-Bill -- after being whipped -- as a means of sticking their tongue out at PM Harper and the Conservatives, it would already be gone. Getting rid of what the good old obstructionist Opposition itself KNEW (and know) to be a silly dud certainly isn't a risky position to take.


pegger
said

Harper's running out of ideas. Are we really going to waste more time beating this dead horse? The cost of this program has now shrunk to insignificance, but he thinks he can get some mileage out of it.


Daveyboy
said

Thank goodness someone fiscally responsible with our money is running in this election. Scraping the long gun registry alone could fund many social programs with out increasing taxes. Conservative majority for a stable and prosperous Canada.


Mark Vancouver
said

How embarrassing is that - they make the people attending the meeting sit on hay bales - a bunch or hay-seeds. Not how I would want to be portrayed by a politician and his media boys.


Old Ted
said

You can get killed with a baseball bat. You can get killed with a knife. You can get choked to death with bare hands. You can get killed with a registered gun. You can get killed with a black market gun. Any way it is done, you are still dead. Registering legitimate guns seems to have done nothing to even slow down gun related murders. Murders with unregistered guns seems to happen primarily in cities like Toronto where those very voters want to have guns registered. For the most part, big city people know exactly nothing about guns yet they want to make the rules which just waste billions of dollars of tax payers money for no gain.


DCI
said

More hot air... These people are so desparate for votes. The gun registry could have and should have been delt with a long time ago. Bye the way; the gun registry has nothing to do with stopping criminals getting guns. the bad guys will always find a way. Wouldn't it be nice if Harper would have as his top prority as education for our young people.And child care. He just doesn't get it!! We want a government that stops spending our money like there is no tomorrow. Conservative... what a joke that is.And then yesterday Harper says he will give Canadians money for keeping in shape. After the budget is balanced. How bloody stupid does this guy think we are? Most of us will be dead of old age before that happens. Hard to find one of these people to voter for. Not one of them has any new ideas at all. Just the same old lies...to get your vote.Oh, by the way, does anyone remember the 2 billion dollar party Harper just had at our expence? Don't forget that one when you mark your ballot. Harper will put this country in such debt, we will never get out. I wished that we Canadians could fire all of them and start fresh. These people are all so out of touch. Like old stale bread....


Glen
said

The money spent on the long gun registry is a total waste. It should be spent on health or education or any other place of value.


Gunner - Ottawa
said

It's about time the Gun Registry costing taxpayers billions of dollars is abolished. If anyone out there believe that a "gun would be registered" to do a crime think again. It appears that more and more knives are being used. Unfortunately there will always be "crime" but with the other parties more for the "criminals" than the "victims" will it ever change unless the "laws" are changed. Conservatives trying to change some laws but voted against by the other parties. If something were to happen in their lives the laws would change and it's about time in many situations that they do...


farmer fred
said

I'm not a big fan or the LGR. It is neither as bad, or as useful as both sides claim. What I do know though is that Harper is playing gun owners as chumps. If Harper wanted to get rid of the LGR, rather than use it for political games, he could have rather easily. All he would have had to do was make it a confidence motion, or put it in the budget any time in the last 4 of 5 years and it would have passed. Enough Liberals would have come down with the flu to avoid an election and it would have been gone. If you own a gun as a farmer or hunter and think Harper gives a rats hindend about your concerns you are living in a fantasy world.


Hallie (Don MIlls)
said

Not all cops are in favour of this costly government waste of a program. It's not as widely accepted as some proponents believe it to be. We need less laws, less costs, less intrusion and more adequate penalties for offenders instead of sending them to school which is what Ignatieff proposed yesterday - go figure how that is dealing with crime TODAY?!! Ignatieff just doesn't get it.


Brian Fr Langley
said

Here in BC the gangs are pouring south and bringing back weapons by the truck load. Oh, and they don't register them. The only people that are obeying these laws are the ones already abiding by them. This is the worse use of Governmnet resources Canada has ever seen. ABOLISH the long gun registry. This is not an issue of ideolgies, it is simply a failure of the urban to understand the needs and values of the rural.


GHW
said

As a responsible law abiding hunter and family man I got rid of all my guns when this registry kicked in. I did not want to be placed on a police watch list or worse yet sent to jail because some low life thief stole my gun. As tragic as the initial incident was, this expensive useless money wasting registry was never going to make a real difference and only served to further divide rural and urban Canada.


Caroline
said

Cut salaries and pensions of members of parlement before you cut the gun registry. Cut all the waiste in the federal gov after. There are lot's of fat to cut everywhere Mr Harper! Leave the gun registry alone, it came after a terrible tragedy that targeted women. I'm sure farmers and hunters would understand if it were their daughters that died that day.


Bryan
said

The police say it would be a big mistake. They say they use it. If they use it...if it saves lives...it should stay. Who is Harper to say it should be scraped or not. If we scrap it, that'll make it an even bigger waste of money. I don't like it when the government makes decisions about things it doesn't understand. Another example of this would be the long form for the census. When a politician ignores the advice of the current, and former Chief Statistician of Canada, you really have to question their motives.


Kac
said

Get over it Harper and move on. More important is his statement " Harper says he would never have hired Bruce Carson to advise him had he known about his past." But he did know and he did hire him. When will Harper stop lying to Canadians. Every time he gets caught in a lie he just denies and hopes we will believe him, the shocking thing is that a lot of Conservative do believe him. Maybe Harper is the real conman and we are the victims. You have to give him credit, he's very good at deceiving us.


Paul
said

The Liberals and NDP should have let their M.P's vote the way they wanted and the registry would have faded into never never land. Instead they make it a whipped vote to please those who live in downtown Toronto who can't seem to understand that a voluntary "gun registry" is no more useful then using snow to cook your food with. As long as the Liberals and NDP support the registy it will cost them votes and this time around will cost them seats.


J.C.
said

I do not know if abolishing the gun registry is a good or bad thing. According to the police chief's it should be kept but according to the individual officers I speak to on occasion it is not. they claim the reason it is accessed so much is because everytime they check for something on their program it automatically checks the registry as well. I don't think it stops any bad guys from acquiring guns though.


Dayton
said

Surely we can balance the budget by getting rid of programs that have no business being there. The LGR is one example there are plenty more.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Election 2011

CTV Election Central

Election Cental

Click here for latest news, blogs, polls, issues and more.

Election Results

Election Results

Extensive election results. Click here to find out who won in your riding.

Campaign Blog

Campaign Blog

Latest reports, photos and videos straight from the campaign trail.

Election 2011 at CTV News

Election 2011 at CTV News

In Pictures: CTV News team prepares for Monday's election special

Poll Tracker - Final

Poll Tracker

Follow the dots on our nightly poll, plus analysis by Nik Nanos.

the party, promo

The Party

How hard can it be to create a political party? Watch the episodes.

Leader Profiles

Leader Profiles

What's their strategy, and how have things changed since the last election?

CTV's Question Period

CTV's Question Period

Politicians under the gun. Newsmakers on the hotseat.

Power Play

Power Play

Don Martin with a fresh look at politics, politicians and plays.

Today's Top Stories

Former Liberian President Charles Taylor waits for the start of his sentencing judgement in the courtroom of the Special Court for Sierra Leone in Leidschendam, near The Hague, Netherlands, Wednesday May 30, 2012.  (AP / Toussaint Kluiters)

Charles Taylor gets 50 years for 'brutal' crimes

More   2 Comments 2    2 Video(s) 2

A police officer removes a package containing a human foot from the Conservative Party headquarters in Ottawa on Tuesday, May 29, 2012. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Police probe body parts in Ottawa, torso in Montreal

More    Comments    4 Video(s) 4

Supporters of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, hold placards and banners bearing images of him before the verdict was given in his extradition case at the Supreme Court in London, Wednesday, May 30, 2012. (AP / Matt Dunham)

Britain's top court backs extradition of WikiLeaks chief

More   4 Comments 4    2 Video(s) 2