Top Stories -   

1
Stephen Harper delivers a speech during a campaign rally in Malpeque, PEI, Friday, April 1, 2011. (Adrian Wyld / THE CANADIAN PRESS) Stephen Harper pauses as he speaks during a visit to a factory in Dieppe, N.B., on Friday April 1, 2011. (Adrian Wyld / THE CANADIAN PRESS) Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff speaks to supporters during a campaign stop in London, Ont., Friday, April 1, 2011. Jack Layton speaks during an NDP campaign stop in Sudbury, Ont, Friday, April 1, 2011. Stephen Harper speaks during a visit to a factory in Dieppe, N.B., on Friday April 1, 2011. (Adrian Wyld / THE CANADIAN PRESS) Stephen Harper speaks during a Conservative campaign stop in Dieppe, N.B., Friday, April 1, 2011.

Harper vows to scrap per-vote subsidies

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV News Channel: Harper speaks, part one
During a campaign stop in Dieppe, N.B., Conservative Leader Stephen Harper focuses on Canada's progress towards economic recovery and job creation. Harper says the Tories will extend the work sharing program to an additional 16 weeks if re-elected.
CTV News Channel: Harper speaks, part two
The Tory leader takes questions from the media during a campaign stop, where he discusses televised debates, Tory attack ads and economic recovery.
CTV News Channel: Liberal Leader Ignatieff
Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff has announced a new plan to give Canadian families some help to look after ailing loved ones in their own homes. He also reiterated that Liberals believe the corporate tax rate in Canada is already competitive, and Ottawa should be investing in education.
CTV News Channel: Layton speaks in Sudbury
Speaking at an NDP campaign stop in Sudbury, Ont., Layton discusses access to health care and answers a question on whether NDP support is dwindling.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (127) Facebook   

Stephen Harper delivers a speech during a campaign rally in Malpeque, PEI, Friday, April 1, 2011. (Adrian Wyld / THE CANADIAN PRESS) Stephen Harper pauses as he speaks during a visit to a factory in Dieppe, N.B., on Friday April 1, 2011. (Adrian Wyld / THE CANADIAN PRESS) Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff speaks to supporters during a campaign stop in London, Ont., Friday, April 1, 2011. Jack Layton speaks during an NDP campaign stop in Sudbury, Ont, Friday, April 1, 2011. Stephen Harper speaks during a visit to a factory in Dieppe, N.B., on Friday April 1, 2011. (Adrian Wyld / THE CANADIAN PRESS) Stephen Harper speaks during a Conservative campaign stop in Dieppe, N.B., Friday, April 1, 2011.

Photos

Stephen Harper delivers a speech during a campaign rally in Malpeque, PEI, Friday, April 1, 2011. (Adrian Wyld / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

View Larger Image

Date: Fri. Apr. 1 2011 9:09 PM ET

Prime Minister Stephen Harper said Friday he'd still like to overhaul the party subsidy system, while Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff announced a pledge for a family care plan and NDP Leader Jack Layton promised to increase the number of doctors and nurses in Canada.

During a campaign stop in Dieppe, N.B., Harper said he still wants to eliminate the current per-vote subsidy system -- but would only try to bring in changes if he forms a majority government.

Currently, political parties receive a $2-per-vote subsidy, but Harper has long opposed the system, which was brought in by the Liberals when corporate and union donations were banned.

He said Friday that political parties already enjoy "enormous tax advantages" and taxpayers should not have to support parties they don't support with their votes. Harper added that the subsidy only helps to ease the way for frequent elections.

"This enormous cheque that keeps piling into parties ever month whether they raise any money or not that means we're constantly having campaigns, the war chests are always full for another campaign," he said.

"You lose one, immediately in come the cheques, you're ready for the next one even if you didn't raise a dime."

The last time Harper's party tried to scrap the subsidy system, following the 2008 election, the three opposition parties revolted and threatened to create a parliamentary alliance to replace the Conservatives.

The prime minister promised the change would happen slowly.

"We're estimating a three-year transition, we'll talk to the other parties about the best way to do it," Harper said.

Bloc Quebecois leader Gilles Duceppe accused Harper of trying to hobble smaller parties like his, saying the move would "run against democracy."

"Parties trying to break through, like the Greens, would have practically no means. That guy would be happy with no opposition and no Parliament," he said in Quebec City.

Also in Dieppe, Harper said his party still plans to implement several initiatives introduced in the federal budget, including extending a job-sharing program designed to reduce layoffs, as well as a program that aims to help older workers find new jobs.

"The top priority for our government, is protecting and creating Canadian jobs, Harper said Friday morning, adding that his opponents have offered "precious little" on job creation and protection.

"Their focus is large-scale, expensive spending schemes, paid for, inevitably, by raising taxes," he said.

Harper will remain in the Maritimes for the rest of the day, travelling to Prince Edward Island on Friday afternoon.

NDP, Liberals talk health care, family care

NDP Leader Jack Layton told an audience in Sudbury, Ont., that a New Democrat government would spend $165 million to increase the number of doctors and nurses in Canada. He said his government would aim to recruit and train more new medical professionals, something the Harper government has failed to do, he said.

"Far too many Canadians are not able to get the health care they need, when they need it," Layton said.

"Five years ago, Stephen Harper said he'd make your health care a top priority. But for five years, he's failed to act."

Layton promised the NDP would add 1,200 doctors and 6,000 nurses over a 10-year period, and would aim to repatriate 300 Canadian doctors living abroad.

The NDP would also forgive the student debt of anyone willing to practise as a family doctor for 10 years.

Further south, in the city of London, Ont. Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff announced a pledge for a $1-billion "family care" plan that the party estimates could help 630,000 family caregivers a year.

The plan would create an EI benefit that would allow Canadians take up to six months off from work to look after a sick family member, as well as a tax benefit that targets low- and middle-income caregivers looking after a family member.

Ignatieff noted that about 40 per cent of people who take time off work to care for relatives have to dig into their savings to get by.

He said the issue is deeply personal for him.

"As some of you know, my mom got Alzheimer's disease when she was in her early 60s. It was a devastating blow to the family. She was the kind of anchor and centre of our family," Ignatieff said.

"My dad then stepped up in retirement to look after her. He didn't want to send her into a home, so we looked after her in the home."

Ignatieff also fired back at Harper for what he called personal attacks against his family in a recent Tory memo.

"There are certain things that are off-limits to me," he said. "I don't attack his patriotism. I don't attack his family. He's attacked my patriotism, he's attacked my family."

The Conservatives' memo recently questioned Ignatieff's story of how his father came to Canada as an immigrant.

"The family stuff cuts deep," Ignatieff said. "It was my dad who looked after my mom at home. And he (Harper) allowed his party to attack my father, who served this country for 30 years as a public servant and was a proud Canadian."

With files from The Canadian Press

Comments are now closed for this story

Peter in MB
said

Why should tax payers have to pay 2.00 per vote per year to parties they do not support. If people what to support parties they can always mail them a cheque. Also unions should not be allowed to contribute part of union dues to parties (NDP) with out the consent of the member. As a union member of the MGEU I do not give the union permission to deduct an additional 50 cents off my pay cheques to give to the Manitoba NDP party or the federal NDP.


Starter
said

Tories are willing to give up this funding and rely solely on voluntary personal donations. Why do the Liberals insist on continuing to stick it to the taxpayer?


Northerner13
said

I think this is the greatest thing ever. Perhaps we would be able to get rid of the Bloc this way and hopefully we can get back to federal only parties to represent Canada instead localized parties with their own self interests.


JPC
said

It's simple. Canadian tax dollars going to support a seperatist party. Enough said, subsidies have to GO!


George V.
said

I don't want my tax dollars to go to political parties that have no elected members in parliament, or receive their $2.00 stipend for every vote they receive in a riding but have no candidate running in that riding, or have only candidates running in only one province (they want to separate). If the voters believe in the party, share it's views,and want to see them as the governing party of our country, the party members will contribute, This should come from party members only, not from all Canadians who don't share their views Give Harper his majority and do away with this cash cow. HARPER X


Akimmerly
said

The Government of Canada should not be for sale to the highest bidder. The subsidy was introduced to promote democracy, encourage people to cast their vote and help support underrepresented opinions.


NoContest
said

Why am I paying any money at all so some people I've never met can run for some political office? Harper says that this pay-per-vote is to be taken out, but only if he wins a majority?!? What are you 6? You're only going to make things better if you get your way....thanks Harper, that's all we needed to know.


Harvey (Toronto)
said

I am not in favor of my tax dollars propping up ANY political party any where at any time. PM Harper is 100% right to consider ditching this partisan ill conceived Chretien plan. Why should Canadians pay to prop the Bloc - are we nuts???


Wondermatt
said

Scrapping the subsidies is completely undemocratic. I won't be voting for the NDP or Green parties, but it sickens me that this decision would effectively cut off their funding entirely.While Liberal and Conservative supporters might be rich enough to afford to donate to political parties, the students and workers that tend to support the NDP and Greens don't have that money to give. These parties are already underrepresented in our parliament because of our "first past the post" system, and this would completely silence them.If you're really a fan of our "democracy" you'll realize exactly how dangerous this decision is.Please, Ignatieff, stay on your A-game and topple these undemocratic crooks.


Niagara George
said

Two dollars per vote is the best expenditure this or any government could have. It distributes our taxes in the fairest and most equitable way possible and it should encourage everyone to get out an vote for the party they support.


Elias Nasrallah
said

@Steve, you are not a Conservative man. I wish those Liberals posing as Conservatives stop talking. They way you bash Mr. Harper, you are obviously not a Conservative. As for the Subsidy system, I don't want my tax dollars going to support the Bloc for obvious reasons. I do not vote Liberal or NDP. If they all think that they have the support, then they should have not problems raising funds themselves. People should only finacially support those they want to vote for.


Liberal On the Fence
said

Although I have voted liberal in the past, I have to say this is a good idea. I may vote conservative this year just so I dont have to vote again next year, or risk having my taxs jacked way up... but we will see.


PBW
said

Abdula in Kanata states, "He knows that his war chest is bigger because of industry ". The whole deal about the $2 government subsidy was that it is no longer legal to get large donation from any individual, union or corporation. The donation is, I believe, about $1100 per person or entity. Had Abdula actually contributed to a political party, he would have known that! As it is, it is grassroots support that gives the Conservatives the monetary edge.


DGRose
said

The only way we'll be rid of this tax is if the CPC get a majority; last time he tried to abolish the vote tax money grab the Opposition rewarded us with a coalition attempt to take over Parliament. Funny how they never did that on any of the numerous confidence motions in the months beforehand. I guess even a mouse will become a rabid rat if you threaten it's food source.Get rid of the vote tax please, we all pay enough taxes anyway and I'm really fed up with these whirlwind elections.


R Henry
said

It is very hard to believe anything that Stephen Harper says. Here in Alberta we can remember that when he and Stockwell Day and other Reform Party members like Chuck Strahl said loud and clear that when they became the government in Ottawa they were going to eliminate the gold plated pensions for MP's. When they got elected they immediately signed onto the pension program and now two of those are quitting and taking pensions of over $160,000 per year for the rest of their lives.


Pip
said

There has been much talk from various politicians and posters on CTV boards about Harper being "undemocratic" and a "dictator". How democratic was it when the Liberals introduced the $2 per voter subsidy to political parties without asking the electorate - who pay the bill - if they were in favor? As far as I am concerned, a political party is like a charity: I either support it or don't: I will not be forced into contributing to something I do not believe in, and this subsidy is exactly that - an enforced contribution, totally undemocratic. Of course, when it came up, the parties voted for it - it was free "Government money", conveniently forgetting that such money comes from taxpayer, the electorate. If they want to get $2.00 for a party, have a line on the income tax form where a person can name the party and have that $2.00 sent that in the correct direction. At least then a person has the choice of whether to take part in the scheme. I suspect the opposition parties are against the withdrawal of the subsidy - ONLY if Harper gets a majority - because they have not built the sort of grassroots support the Conservatives have. The very fact there is so much hue and cry over this leads me to believe they are concerned Harper WILL get a majority!


Maureen
said

If they scrap the vote subsidy, then they must reinstitute the ability for corporations to massively fund political parties. That is what used to happen, and that ability was taken away and replaced with the vote subsidy. I'd rather not go back to the former. It was sickening to see an oil company, for instance, pouring money into one party or another's coffers to get them elected. It also made parties beholden to those entities, which is not a good thing for our political process.


Jane
said

Wouldn’t it be refreshing if tax dollars were actually were put to good use to benefit Canadians instead of filling the so called “war chests”? Isn’t it high time that the government, both at the federal and the provincial level, learn to control or limit their spending so taxes do not constantly have to be adjusted and raised? Your “average” taxpayer does not qualify for the Sunshine List and we feel the pinch of increased taxes and increased prices so stop promising the moon.


Scott
said

Great idea to scrap the subsidy to the political parties. Taxpayers clearly do not want an election right now... If the parties did not have free money in their coffers, they probably would not have forced an election right now.I just watched a story on CTV News Channel - which asks the question: why is the campaign so boring? It has nothing to do with the leaders. 6/10 Canadians do not want to be going to the polls right now.


steve
said

as a conservative voter for the last 10 years it is becoming abundantly clear to me that Mr. Harper is losing total touch of what it is to be Canadian. i am not liking what i am seeing from fellow conservatives who are twisting the truth as shown on this board. it is very scary to see the lies to the point of my party resembling the republicans more and more every day. i will definately be switching my allegiance.


Bulldog
said

Did it ever occur to any of the opposition supporters that PM Harper wasn't dodging reporters questions and that he was simply simply focusing the nature of the questioning to the nature of the topic he was speaking about? I find the anti-Harper gang quite entertaining with how they love to make a mountain out of a molehill.


CDM
said

Of course the per vote subsidy should be scrapped. Over 25 million a year of our money is paid to the parties for this subsidy. I'm sure this money could go to many better uses. You want to be a party on the national stage? Raise your own money.@Lee - How do you figure the F35 contract is going to Harpers "buddies" when it was the Liberals that started the process to purchase these jets with a memorandum of understanding with Lockheed Martin? The Conservatives agreed with the Liberals on this purchase and signed the contract. The Liberals are complete hypocrites on this issue. All we need is another moronic Liberal leader winning power and cancelling this contract like Chretien cancelled the helicopter contract, costing 500 million plus in cancellation fees.@Ronald - In case you've been asleep the last couple of years, the bulk of our current deficit is due to the GLOBAL recession and the economic action plan. All 3 opposition parties thought the Conservatives should spend more, so we'd be in a worse situation if the Liberals had been in power.


Albertaboy111
said

I don't understand the logic. How is it, that when you vote for a party and they get two dollars, is a bad thing? I mean, if anything, it encourages more people to vote, as no matter who they vote for, they can feel it makes some sort of contribution. Don't we all want to see more people voting and not less? If it's the cost people are worried about, I suggest they look at the donation tax credits, which by far outweigh the costs of the per vote subsidy.


Girard
said

Well put Marg MM. I see the Liberals moving farther and farther left and by doing that, they are infringing on NDP territory which means, more former NDP'ers (Bob Rae) will be more inclined to vote for the Liberals since their agenda will never get a chance to make into government via the NDP.


peter in BC
said

Per-vote subsidies helped the Conservatives with their push to topple the Liberal government. His interest in getting rid of it now is only because he is in power. And to boot, he'll only scrap them if he gets a majority. Why not as a minority government which you will get, yet again? It is possible now that he's stacked the upper house in his favour. If he scraps it, then he can remove these frequent elections (which he has directly caused some himself) and govern responsibly. So far, I'm seeing a lot of promises from Harper and the Conservatives that are conditional or that will come into effect in several years time. If anything, he's making an argument to not vote for him. I'm looking the other way so far and he'd better come up with something good other than lies, deceit and false advertising.


Chris
said

Joyce says:"These in turn will pay for the Equipment our Forces so badly need"What? How much money do they already receive, compared to health care and the science sector in general? We don't *need* to be killing anyone overseas for their natural resources.


Subsidy - Ottawa
said

NDP Leader is now wanting to do away with subsidies to Alberta oil sands, hike Corporate taxes on oil companies and so on. Mr. Layton is the jet you flew out West and back running on "Vegetable Oil?


NS
said

Harper has the best grip on real issues, and solutions to those issues. Jack has some good ideas, I would like to see the Cons work more with the NDP. Iggy, is all about himself, which matches the current Liberal Party of Canada.... very willing to sacrifice Canadians and our hard earned taxes for this power grab.


Abdula in Kanata
said

The subsidies prevent the party with industry and business support from over powering all the other parties and the CPC know it. Harrper will only scrap it if he has a majority because in doing so it will trigger an election if the minority government still exists. He knows that his war chest is bigger because of industry suport and this is the only way he can prevent any other party from winning. Democracy does not interest the CPC capitalism does. Also he knows that bringing out this topic before forced the opposition parties into a coalition and he desparately wants them to do it again because he knows that the electorate fears a coalition because they have been conned into believing that a coaltion is undemocratic. Why does the CPC believe the people of Canada are naive?


Jeff in TO
said

With a per-vote subsidy, parties are funded based on how they represent Canada. Every voter makes a difference, every vote supports the ones you voted for.Without the subsidy, our votes mean nothing if your candidates don't win. A 4 party system means that a single party could be in control with less than a third of the country supporting them. The party that supports policies that benefit the rich contributors will be funded, the parties that benefit everybody else will not. The end result - a government of the rich, for the rich. Kind of like all those countries that revolted recently.


Melissa
said

Another anti-democratic move. So the richer you are the more advertising you can do. This will cause more hardship on smaller parties. This is not a good thing as he would try to have you believe.DOUBLE SPEAK.


Mark in Wpg
said

Yes how dare we subsidize our parties so that they don't sell themselves to the highest bidder. Take a look at the American lobbying system to see what Harper is going for: a country run by the corporations for the corporations with zero regard for its citizens.


Paul in Toronto
said

I am a Liberal and am tired of all the talk from uninformed people about the F-35. Do we need new fighters? Yes....who knows what we are up against in the future. Do they cost a lot of money? Yes. Will we see a return of our money spent? Yes...Canada has a strong potential in having hundreds of millions awarded to the aerospace industry in contracts.If Brazil and India are also looking into buying these aircraft, I would really be dissappointed in any gov't that would let these countries out fly the Canadian Air Force. As for the poster who suggested we buy Russian aircraft...I have never had such a gut splitting laugh like that.


Roger
said

Wow. I know a lot of people think this is a good idea, but it's kind of dangerous.Basically, the only parties that will be able to operate are those that can raise money. Who can raise money? Those that are business friendly, i.e., conservatives.Just a continuation of their mission to control everything, including how much oppostion there exists.Maybe this is a good thing, Who really knows.I guess my questions to conservative voters is this;1) Are you aware that a conservative majority is essentially moving Canada more towards an American Style society?2) Are you OK with this? If yes, why?


Janus Winnipeg
said

Everyone keeps talking about the economy as if it were the only issue. It is a issue, certainly a very important one, but not the only one. The Liberal caregiver program sounds like a program we need in Canada. We have a moral and legal obligation to take care of our parents and since we work hard for our money why shouldn't there be some compassionate care leave while you deal with perhaps one of the hardest tasks we face, taking care of a critically ill parent. This is not so different from maternity leave. Yes, it will cost employers a bit more but you know what, business owners are people too with parents they will need to take care of too. After all as Mahatma Ghandi once said, "A nation's greatness is measured by how it treats its weakest members”.


Anti Pye
said

The Liberals have a long history of campaigning on the left and governing on the right. This election is no different than every other election in my lifetime. Take child care for instance. The Liberals campaigned for five elections promising child care and never did deliver. The Liberals want the NDP votes but do not want to fulfill the promises stolen or borrowed from the NDP. That is why it makes no sense at all to go from the NDP to the Liberals. The Liberals will tell NDP supporters anything to steal the vote.


TrustHarper?
said

Lots of talk about Harper keeping taxes 'low' while the Liberals and NDP spend out of control. Look closely: Harper might not raise taxes but he'll cut program spending. Think about what that means for your children and family in general. Under-funded social programs have wrecked havoc on the social underbelly of Canada. Also think about the notion of 'Fragile' economic recovery and job creation. His EI promises are 1) short-term; and 2) marginal at best. This will probably only affect unskilled part-time labour anyways. Look things up people and get engaged: this is an opportunity to ask the right questions....at least to some party leaders.


Vanc Guy
said

Of course do away with them. Control donations and keep these parties honest. I don't want my tax dollars used like this.


Tom in Calgary
said

This doesn't go far enough. Scrap the tax break that donators get too. My Tory friends if you are really behind this measure push your leader, if you are allowe to talk to him, to scrap the millions in income tax rebates given to those who donate. For every $100 donated, $75 is returned. We end up subsidizing the parties anyway.


The Big Cee
said

Today's campaign promises: The NDP will spend millions. The Liberals will spend billions. The Conservatives will save millions, maybe billions and stop giving political parties instant war chests whether they have a chance of forming government or not. I, for one, say the Conservatives have earned my vote with this one provision: stop giving my tax dollars to the Bloc!


duffman
said

Another interesting thing regarding this coalition. Did anybody who is posting regarding this coalition between the three Bloc,ndp, and liberals,that all three leaders of their parties had signed. You know that the original one they tried to topple the government with the last time is still in effect. The document expires in june i believe it is. So they can say we are not forming a new coalition,this one is still valid. This clearly explains the desperate need for an election. Once June comes around the agreement expires.

Concerned
said

Well of course he wants to scrap the subsidies - he doesnt need them does he - Big corporations support the CONS - he rewards them by giving the Corporate tax cuts. By cutting the susidies - no other party will ever have any money to oppose/run agaist him. He's done the same thing by stacking the senate - only his bills/laws will be passed - can we say DICTATOR! Wake up people , he is slowly, but surely eroding Candian democracy and taking all the power for himself.


Steve in Vancouver
said

The opposition are making lots of promises costing billions of dollars. What they don't offer is a plan on how to pay for them. What we do know is that our taxes would go way up. While the promises the Liberals put out there cost billions, their plans would be very costly to implement and maintain. Also what they offer would be open to wide abuse. How do they ensure that abuse wont occur. We know it does with the programs we have now such as EI to name just one.


Chris
said

To PM Harper:Yes, keep up the good work, Sir. As a registered voter and party supporter, in addition with doing away with subsidies, I would like to ask that WHEN (not if) you get your majority, can you also incorporate an election law stating that every National Party must have a candidate run in EVERY riding? This may solve the Bloc Quebecois problem!!! Thank you for your attention, Sir.


Wyne
said

Personally I like the $2 vote, That way if I don't like any of them then nobody gets my $2!!


Gord. Robson, Nova Scotia
said

"debs" ..Ignatieff "flip flops" all the time..that is why all the fuss ! I for one, due to Ignatieffs past performance, do not believe him...In my 68 years I have seen and heard many Liberal "promises" and their campaign platforms...The Liberals have a history of breaking a lot of their promises so why should anyone believe them now?..he will not form a coalition ?...I do not believe it ..I have seen different !!..I know of what I speak !


Angry westener
said

Boogles my mind where do the liberals think they are going to get all this money for all of these big pommises, sorry ignatiff my wallet is empty. Broken prommise again, just like they said they would get rid of the GST. Then they changed their mines. another liberal LIE! Or may they think they will steal more money out of western provinces.


David, Mississauga
said

Harper is preaching to choir on this one. Scrapping the subsidy is entirely an exercise to serve the Conservative Party. The cost savings are negligible.


Dave
said

Another election and same old stories. Health care, jobs, infastructure etc, etc, etc. I agree that our type of governing body is not the best but step back and take a good hard look. Isn't it about time the elected officials were held accountable for their actions. If you want an election every time you are dissatisfied with each other, then you and your parties should bear the total cost of such an election. Why should we the tax payers be responsible for you acting like a bunch of kids not getting the right type of popsicle from the box. With the cost of an election now upon us, and if your not satisfied with out decision this time, law should be passed that an election can only be held every four years no matter what the other parties disagree with. Unless a criminal offence has been committed, suck it up. Should the parties not agree, send it to a third party to rule. Costing tax payers more - you as a party bear the cost of the election, we the canadian people do not want.


Pete
said

Why do you moderators keep omitting my comments? Did I attack someone, or say something offensive? I think I know why but would love to hear your explanantion.


John Sask
said

The sooner the vote subsidies are removed the better! Then we won't have all these useless elections that no-one but politicians want. Give Harper a majoity and get rid of it and at the same time, get rid of the also useless gun registry. Two very large useless tax drains!!!!!


Tom in the West
said

Gee Craig Oliver and CTV...what should the Conservatives do to bury the Liberals? You seem full of ideas and snarky comments about what the Liberals should do.


MARG MM
said

Well, it should be about jobs and the economy. If people aren't working, they aren't able to spend money or pay taxes.If the Liberals raise the business taxes, there could be more people out of work, but then they wouldn't need the Liberals 16 Billion dollar ( yes it was reported as such on CBC) child care plan, which, by the way would be forced upon the Provinces. Corporations big and small give heavily to charity projects across the country including hospitals, and they are the employers of millions of Canadians. Ontario (Liberal Government) is also cutting their Corporate tax rate to encourage more business. The Federal Liberals are becoming more socialistic, perhaps because they have been infilterated by previous NDP members, which is why I have no doubt that, if there is a Conservative minority Government, the Liberal/NDP will team up with the support of the Bloc. It is very obvious that Jack Layton is only going after the Conservatives, and this is strange, as it is the Liberals that are taking votes away from the NDP. I guess they somehow still feel secure even if the Liberals gain from them. Very suspicious indeed. Also the Liberals wanting an election while trailing in the polls, again very suspicious.


Joyce
said

When one looks at the things presented by those on the Election trail, I feel the need to respond here in the comment section. The example I would like to give is the one where Premier McGuinty said he had job creation on his list, well this job creation was in the Public sector, and it did outflank the Private job creation by a big margin. Job creation in the private sector is the one which fuels the Public Sector, and when that is not there, we see the Budget going into a Deficit, and that I certainly do not look for. The Economy is driven by Private Sector Jobs and it is this that gives us the funds to fund Public Sector jobs.These in turn will pay for the Equipment our Forces so badly need, and it will fuel the Medicare etc. Since when are we as Parents not responsible for ensuring the welfare of our children. Is this for Government to do for us. Are we not responsible for their upbringing. Just my opinion and am not being paid for this by any party.


JHans
said

On another note...why does he use the term "Coalition" so much, as if he fears it....HE, after all, used to be the PRESIDENT of the National Citizens "Coalition".....Many of their goals have been achieved, since Stephen Harper has been Prime Minister. I challenge people to research on the National Citizens Coalition.


Rick @ Ottawa
said

I want to thank all the members of the Liberal, NDP, Green and BQ parties for supporting the Conservatives with your tax dollars. Thank you very much, we appreciate it.


JHans
said

I find it funny how Harper puts a tight cap on the amount of questions people are able to ask him. I figure he's afraid to say the wrong thing which will be held against him during this and future elections, as some from the past have come to haunt him!!!


Lee
said

Harper insists that the number one issue is the economy, despite the fact that most Canadians think otherwise: they are more concerned about health care. Harper insists that we need more prisons to hold criminals because of "unreported crimes". If a crime is unreported, then how does the criminal require a spot in prison? Harper insists that we need to buy fighter jets without tendering the contract, which naturally goes to his buddies. Why don't we find out what we need and then tender the contract to the those who can provide it at the best price? Why? Because Harper insists, an refuses to listen to what Canadians want.


Mark in Newmarket
said

The economy needs special attention, especially with the way it has been over the last couple of years. You need a strong robust economy to help pay for things like healthcare, if you don't have that strong economy, then there is simply less money coming in which means less money to spend on healthcare. We have to put our needs ahead of our wants and if you want better healthcare then you are going to need a better economy. As for the deficity, it is simple. The government needed to increase spending to pay out EI claimants and on a stimulus package in order to kickstart the economy and all three parties agreed on that. Could you have imagined if they didn't spend during the recession? The suffering of people in there everyday lives who had lost their jobs would have been mulitplied and the economy would have not recovered to the point it is at now.


Earthwatcher
said

The economy IS the biggest priority for the next government. Without a growing economy, more stable jobs and the tax base that provides no other programs can exist or be expanded. The Liberals and NDP have grandiose schemes to provide all these programs and provide for the citizens of this country. In theory, great. In reality, we cannot afford their approach to government. Spend, spend spend and then tax, tax, tax us into ruin. No chance...[X] Conservative, majority government please and thank you. Now if we could just get the young voters of this country off their apathetic butts and get involved there could be some real change.


Doug ( ^^^ ) Surrey,BC
said

Take the personalities out of your voting criteria for a minute.Ask yourself if you think our justice sytem is working.Ask yourself if our health care system is working.Do you really think our military is propely equipped? How about boat thousands of illegal refugees living off taxpayers while so many Canadian citizens struggle to get by? Will your kids want welfare,or will they want real jobs in real industries? Will the want a Canada that is a national player,or a Canada that relies on the USA for both it's defense,and it's economy? I was a Liberal for decades.I switched to voting Conservative because I truly believe we need better immigration law.I believe we need violent criminals somewhere other than on the streets of our communities.I believe we need a military that can work with ALL our allies in other parts of the world. The point I'm trying to get at,is that almost all of the institutions and services that we have now were built decades ago.None of them are up to 21st century standards,and we have no idea how much it wll cost to fix them.Common sense tell me we should fix what we already have before we let our GREED tempt us into being bribed by even more "free" social programs. Given the global economy,the best thing we can do is suck it up,raise and pay for our own children,and spend on things that they will have when we are gone.The "free" programs that the left is offering are really for OUR BENEFIT.We need to see our children as adults,and build a Canada that will be safe,sovereign,and provide them with jobs for their families.Not more welfare ."Free" child care does nothing for the children you claim you really care about.It only helps YOU,and,barely does that.


bryan in ontario
said

PM Harper has just said on CTV If he gets a majority because he cant do with a minority that he will "Scrap the political per vote subsidy", What will Ignatieff, layton, duceppe & ms. may, have say to about that. Lets see if they even comment, Chirp Chirp


Ronald
said

Harper is one to talk about the economy when he spends and spends our tax dollars as if there is tomorrow this man as put us inti deficit and that is just to satisfy his giant ego at the Toronto summit and buying over expensive fighter planes when he could of bought Russian export version of the Sukoy 27 fighter 10 of them would of cost 14.0 million dollars. this man bought fighters that are way too expensive and the price range will grow and grow and they estimate about 100 million dollars per plane. Imagine the kind of medical doctors we could of gotten for 5 million Canadians who do not have a doctor in this country.


Bob
said

So the Liberals have talked about creating an EI benefit and also increasing pensions. Can it get any worse for small business owners! All that says is that premiums would be going up! Yes that would factor into how many employees I have! Thanks Iggy for looking at options that raise premiums instead of taxes. Same you know, just a different pile!


Doug ( ^^^ ) Surrey,BC
said

Spin it any way you want to folks.But when it comes to spending,both parties will spend about the same amount.Left wingers wil spend it to give us things we WANT now."free" child care and more health care.Not evil notions.But it is still spending on ourselves.And I question how useful "free" social programs will be if our streets are not safe to walk on because the criminals who molest,drug,and kill our children roam freely.Or if our children will even grow up with a country,if we don't defend the nation that we are borrowing from them. THis is not about Stephen Harper.This is about whether we spend the finite number of dollars we have on special programs that we WANT,or we build make our streets safe for our kids to walk on by jailing those who do them harm.I think we NEED that.It's about building industry so they will have jobs when they grow up and want to have families of their own.They will all NEED that.It's about whether or not we can build a safe nation,with police and a military that can defend us,and our children.No matter who you are,you NEED a measure of safety,and so do your children.It's about our money.Should we use it to support and pay for illegal refugees when we could be spending it on projects that can provide jobs for Canadians? The self righeous on the politcal left are trying to guilt you into supporting warm and fuzzy social programs,but they refuse to even talk about immigration,defense,criminal justice.ALL the things we NEED before we start spending on more things that we WANT.By going down this path the harm we do to our chilldren by leaving them in chaos,far outweights any beneift they would get from "free" child care.


CMQ
said

Ummm, Iggy, there already is an EI Benefit where people can take time off to care for a loved one. I worked in a major coroporation for 10 years where we had this, not as a corporate benefit, but one that was paid through the government. It's called "compassionate leave." Nice try on bringing up an existing program. As for the corporate tax, a good number of your cabinet ministers brought this idea in and passed it years ago so I don't think it will be as popular as you think and I can see how after a short time you would bring it back in during a budget. The day care issue, is like "crying wolf" been there and done that since 1993, not credible.


BA
said

I can't stand how you Liberals complain about the state of health care and blame the Conservatives for your problems. The damage to our system wasn't caused overnight, it stems from years of underfunding during several years of Liberal majority governments. It's so typical of the Liberals to conveniently make health care an election agenda, meanwhile they never put forward a plan with any real substance to combat the problems, other than tax us to death with very little return on our investment.It's true that without your health nothing else really matters, and our system does need improvement, although the current system is a black-hole for money and simply throwing more at it won't solve the problems. I certainly don't trust the Liberals to solve our health care problems. In BC we're heavily taxed under the Liberals, we still pay high monthly health premiums, and our health care system is still in rough shape. No thanks to Liberal high taxes and mismanagement.


John I Timmermans
said

When it isn't broken don't fix it. Our government is flourising at its best. Under Harpers reign our country is in good shape. We owe much,much less per capita on the national debt than any other Western country,keep that in mind.


Charlie
said

Worry about the economy first the the others will fall into place.


SW Calgary Guy
said

@ Paul(wpg). You can trust Harper won't raise taxes because he isn't going about the country announcing expensive programs the country cannot afford. His record is clear - income tax is down and so is the GST


Debs
said

@ Fred N Ont - You are mistaken. The Liberals did not order the jets. They signed a memorandum of understanding. That's not an order.


George (Ottawa)
said

Ignatieff's insistance to have a direct debate with Steven Harper, is just another indication of the high opinion he is having of himself.It goes therefore without saying that his concempt of democracy needs some review.


don.h
said

if you do not have a stable economy, all social programs are on shacky ground. it is much like having a temp job, and wondering if you will be able to make your next car payment, because your job might not be there next week. as for a coalition, is it just me or has any one else noticed that both the liberals and NDP have only been in conservative and their own ridings. they have yet to go into each others ridings, or say any thing about each others campain. it smells kind of funny since jack layton keeps saying that he wants to be pm. to do that you have to defeat 2 parties not just one. think about it folks.


Debs
said

@Gord. Robson, Nova Scotia - Mr. Ignatieff has repeatedly stated that he will not be a part of a coalition and yet Mr. Harper is spreading fear by repeatedly stating that he "knows" the left will form a coalition. Why won't Mr. Harper speak the truth? Why is Mr. Harper making such a fuss? Why does he repeat the lie over and over? Mr. Ignatieff is NOT part of a coalition. Do not mislead the people. Over the past 5 years we've had too much of that from the Conservatives. Cheap shots and I for one am fed up...shame on you!


TimeforaChange
said

Just 2 days ago the Grits were 10 pts behind. Today 7. I like the direction this is going in.Keep those winds of change blowing !


David
said

The comments I made were not "bashing", they were a reiteration of facts. Mr. Harper promised Canadians a more open honest government. Mr. Harper has caused an election by choosing to be less open, less honest and refusing to be accountable. Any promises made by Mr. Harper have to be viewed in the light of the promises he made in the previous election. Honest, open and accountable is a great plank, if you are not lying to people when you make the promise. This is not that tough to figure out, Mr. Harper doesn't like being accountable and his actions underscore that he is less than open and less than honest.Mr. Harper treats average Canadians with contempt. We are entering another election because he treats Canadian parliamentarians with contempt. Noting that he treats average Canadians with contempt isn't bashing, it is an iteration of basic fact. Now if I said I really don't like Mr.Harper and provided no reason that would be bashing. I have taken the time to point out the ethical shortcoming of Mr. Harper that bothers me the most. He lied to me during the last election campaign. He got elected and then he broke the promise that he made to get elected. We are entering another election specifically because Mr. Harper broke a promise he made to Canadians during the last election to be more honest, open and accountable. Mr. Harper has chosen secrecy, control and misinformation as his tools. Mr. Harper is the one bashing with the American style attack ads, not Mr. Ignatieff, not me, not the people making comments on this webpage


tthattil
said

boiling it down to the core foundational difference between the conservatives and all the other left leaning parites led by the Liberals is that the Conservatives want to focus on building the economy and helping those who cannot help themsleves. WHILE THE LEFT SIDE LED BY THE LIBERALS WANT TO BRIBE US TO VOTE FOR THEM USING OUR TAX $$$$.


charlie
said

The more I see of Iggy's work on this election campaign, the more I see a man just going through the motions with no real hope of success. Getting elected is tough - much more difficult than being acclaimed or appointed like when he became Liberal leader. Welcome to democracy, Mr. Ignatieff.


stony plainer
said

i am not beholden to any political party. i have voted for different parties in past elections but as a concerned canadian and voter , i feel that stephen harper has lost the moral authority to govern.


Paul(wpg)
said

I love how all the Conservative here just assume any party but Harper's will raise taxes through the roof. Just because Harper hasn't said it, doesn't mean he won't. How in the world do you pay down the largest deficit in Canadian history without raising taxes? Is God going to do it?


Fred N Ont
said

Remember Folks it was the previous liberal government that ordered the jets and spent lots of money in the research and development ,,,,,,, the conservative government only endorsed the final faze of the deal.


Scott
said

Some of you make comments and decisions based on sound bites from the media. Access the full speeches from the leaders before you cast judgement. The way the media reports news has changed dramatically over the last 20 years. My radio newscasts used to be 5 minutes on average at the top of each hour. They now average about one minute with carefully constructed sound bites.. The majority of stories consist of editorial comment... versus reporting what actually happened...


Gord. Robson, Nova Scotia
said

Ignatieff appears to be misleading people about Mr. Harpers "pulling out " of an one on one debate...Mr. Harper has indicated a one on one debate with Ignatieff would be good but that he (Harper) was wanting only one debate but the broadcasters want the debate to have the four party leaders...CTV reported here this morning that the debate with the four leaders would have two segments with just Ignatieff and Harper which is excellent...So why is Ignatieff making such a fuss about not having a one on one when it has been reported that the debate will have 2 segments of one on one..?..Ignatieff...Mr. Harper is NOT running away..speak the truth..do not mislead the people....Over the years we have had too much of it already by the Liberals..cheap shots to the head is what it looks like and I for one am fed up..shame on you !


SW Calgary Guy
said

Stephen Harper talks about jobs and the economy while Layton & Ignatieff talk about spending our money. Is it any wonder Harper's support is on top?


Greg
said

I love all the comments on here bashing Harper. How soon people forget how bad it was when the Liberals were in power. Harper has taken us through one of the worst economic times since the great depression and our country has come out shining compared to others. A majority Harper government is the only hope this country has.


Zircon
said

It just staggers me that the Liberals and NDP continue to talk about what they'll spend for us, in order to get us to vote for them. Are they completely insulated or isolated from the economic situation in the world at large? Countries defaulting on their debt, our largest trading party monetizing debt and simply printing more money to bail themselves out?The 'bubble' that burst in 2008 will be a speedbump if and when the US dollar is officially replaced as the world's reserve currency. But I digress.The economic position of the Harper government is far better (though far from perfect) in terms of how best to get Canada through these times. Purely from an economic point of view, and at a national perspective, Canadians SHOULD give the Conservative government a majority so that we are not dragged down with socialist conceptions of 'bailouts' that never work and only exacerbate the problem.My only issue is that the PM appears more and more each day as if he could have figuratively penned the US 'Patriot Act'. Control over the media, stiffling dissent and shirking accountability and transparency are all things that are against a true and open democracy. If we were not in such dire economic times, I really don't know that he warrants leadership. On the other hand, were he to come out and clearly address and resolve these things in the next 4 weeks, he would almost certainly win a majority!


Paul(wpg)
said

How can Conservaties justify spending excessively on un-tendered jets to defend us against a threat that may never come. This country has already invested billions in NORAD and suddenly it's not good enough! We've never had to commit more than a dozen jets to any NATO operation but now we need 65? These jets won't protect us from terrorists or foriegn interests trying to get our resources, and they are the true threat.


Lavorgna
said

Once again, Harper and the PCs have no idea what is on the minds of Canadians!!!! Every poll that I have seen states that "Healthcare" is the top priority of Canadian Voters. Harper and his PC's top priority is the "Economy". Money, the almighty dollar, is more important than the people's welfare. So typical Mr.Harper! So typical! Yes the economy is important but if the workers that make the "Economy" grow are sick or waiting for surgeries, I guess that the Economy will not be going anywhere...will it Steve!! So much for your grandios promises! My 2 year old has a better grasp on what's important than you do Mr.Harper!


Paul(wpg)
said

Harper and his wife are peas in a pod with Sarah Palin. It's disgusting that some Canadians consider him a viable option for this country.If Harper gets a majority, the values that this country has held dearly for decades will be eroded in four short years. You conservatives really want that?


Cynical
said

Ignatieff "treats average Canadians with contempt. It is the reason we are having an election. His atttiutde isn't warranted given his own personal ethical shortcomings." Lets face it, he made absolutely no demur when made leader of the Liberal Party without being elected. If that is not an ethical shortcoming, what is? A truly ethical person would have declined and insisted upon election as being the democratic thing to do. Liberal supporters on these pages call Mr. Harper a dictator quite readily, yet ignore Mr. Ignatieff's undemocratic rise to power. Mr Harper stepped down when defeated by a vote, not the action of a dictator. Will Mr. Ignatieff step down when HE is defeated in the election? Or will he insist that he should carry on? Will the grassroots Liberal members accept continued rule by an unelected despot? This is beginning to read like a 1950's soap opera; I'd better quit before writing "tune in again next week" . . . oooops!


JoeMc
said

Mr Harper has done nothing for the east coast and will continue to pay lip-service. I think his words were lazy, beer swigging couch potatoes… interesting. Hope he does not use the last words in PEI… Family Care, this means more single parents can afford to put children into a program for $5/day, managed by certified staff and they can work… better than being on welfare, that’s what the program does.. works very well in Que….. If Canadians think that Mr Harper needs a majority to manage Canada, they’re wrong. Harper has spent over $120B in 3 years saying global economy… Canada was well positioned, since we are more prudent with our money and did not take out loans for 50 yrs on our homes… now Mr Harper continues to spend and borrow against our Debt which was reduced from $600B by the Liberals to $440B, now back to $564B because of Harper and his conservative cronies that are milking the system… yes, under investigation. Like Danny Williams says, “ABC” for me…


Tim - Calgary
said

Robert, Timmins said "There have been many successful coalitions in the past that have worked very well."All coalitions involve the party that wins the election like in England right now. A governing coalition does not involve all of the losing parties forming a government and excluding the winning party. People can't seem to understand that would mean basically a coup by a coalition of losers. Does Canada want a coalition of the losers running this country including socialists and separatists?


nodemocracybyharper
said

Harper=harpercrite!Worst PM in history!Prorogue--keep flogging this non-existent coalition---contempt of parliamnt--billions for new prisons for "unreported crimes"---lie to Canadinas about the cost of fighter jets---now he is saying the Americans are wrong in their figures (although there is a federal law which CLEARLY states they cannot sell the same jets to other countries for less then they themselves pay --and their paying 128 million each for the VERY SAME JETS)Wake up people ---do you really want a liar for PM?


Jack - AB
said

So Harper wants people to vote for him to create a majority gov't which explains why he is making spending promises left and right to everyone. Like saying he'll make Halifax an international hub but no idea where the money will come from (no specifics). Like creating free trade with India. What does India buy from Canada? Or will Harper export jobs & switch us over to an import nation? Big corporate tax cuts, reckless spending on prisons and expensive fighter jets, etc. Harper's platform has revealed he will spend and cut taxes by the billions leaving a massive deficit and spiral Canada down into huge US style debt! Harper, you've failed us long enough and unlikely you'll get that majority to ruin Canada!


Damon
said

"It seems that the only thing that the Liberals can come up with is that the government is being called the Harper government."Really? They haven't mentioned the Conservatives failing to disclose proper costs for their justice bills? Haven't mentioned fighter jets not being costed properly? Haven't mentioned Bev Oda misleading parliament? Haven't mentioned 26 million on an ad campaign for a program that is wrapping up? Haven't mentioned Harper offering a one and one debate and then wussing out? The list goes on, Harper switching the name of our government is offensive but just one item on a long list. I am also pretty sure the previous governments you mentioned didn't actually change the name of the departments, check it out though.


David
said

Harper treats average Canadians with contempt. It is the reason we are having an election. His atttiutde isn't warranted given his own personal ethical shortcomings. His promises for open and accountable government in the last election were clearly a lie given where we are today. His promises underscore that he will say anything to get elected and the things that he says are as meaningless now as when they were said. If his government was open or honest we wouldn't need to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on this pointless waste of time. Contempt for parliament is the reason we are here, Contempt for Canadians and contempt for the way we do things is what this election is all about.There it is in a word, contempt.I will not be buying it this time around, the secretive, dishonest governement we have is nothing like the one we were promised.Mr. Harper's promises are going to turn out to be lies again, he treats us with contempt.


Janus Winnipeg
said

Michael Ignatieff has published an open letter on the Liberal website this morning wondering why Stephen Harper refuses to debate him one on one. Stephen Harper previously said he didn't want more than one debate. When you insulate yourself as Stephen Harper has in his years as Prime Minister and you do stuff like impose a limit of 4 questions after each policy announcement, you find that open debate, the principle that democracy is based on, is extremely difficult. Of course Stephen Harper doesn't want more than one debate. The less he talks the more protection he is afforded. Now however, in the age of twitter and online debates it will start to look bad if he continually refuses to debate Michael Ignatieff. I don't blame him, Stephen Harper has everything to loose from participating in an open debate, as he has lost confidence in his own debating skills most likely. Shielded by the PMO all this time and now out on the campaign trail keeping reporters back 40 feet behind steel barricades, limiting questions. I'm sure that every photo opportunity is scripted down to the smallest of details with only the most ardent supporters to be shown in the background. I guess the only reason Stephen Harper would accept is if he were to actually believe in what he was proposing to Canadians. If he believed he was right, if he stood by his convictions and just explained to the Canadian people why we should give him a majority then perhaps this debate would be to his advantage.


Gary in AB
said

It's not that a coalition is bad, its that a coalition between two left leaning parties and a seperatist party is not what a country like Canada needs. We are in a state of economic recovery, the last thing we need is a raise in taxes and further social spending. Can you people not wait the projected 5 years until the books are balanced?


Prof. Pye Chartt
said

A look at yesterday's Nanos polling percentage numbers reported here on CTV (39.1, 32.7, 15.9) against today's figures (39.4, 31.7, 16.1) reveals that the Conservatives are UP a touch, the Liberals are DOWN a full point, and the NDP are UP a touch. Spare me the assertion that this genuinely reflects dandy news for the Liberals and/or bad news for the NDP. (Yes, I "get" that, arguably, it confirms a modest change from a few days ago.) In fact, this comparison shows that the Conservatives' lead on the Liberals has INCREASED slightly. Ultimately, however, it's hard to believe that a great number of Canadians, including NDP supporters, truly see this election race as involving three horses. Let's face; it's really between Harper and Ignatieff. Therefore, quite arguably, a bit of a slide of votes along the ideological plain from NDP to Liberal is neither shocking nor profoundly notable.


Penny
said

Harper shouldn't even be allowed back in the house. Secrets, lies and supporting the rich are not what this country needs.


Old Ted
said

It seems that the only thing that the Liberals can come up with is that the government is being called the Harper government. For as far back as I can remember, it was the Diefenbaker government, the Pearson government, the Trudeau government. It has never been a big deal. Now it is? Come on. Is this all the Liberals can come up with. All the more reason to have a Conservative majority. The other parties are pretty well irrelevant if this is all they can come up with.


S harper
said

According to Stephen Harper ... "[Y]our country [the USA], and particularly your conservative movement, is a light and an inspiration to people in this country and across the world."Unseat Steven Harper


Robert, Timmins
said

Good Lord! Why is it people cannot understand that a coalition involves people working together - and compromising - to achieve common goals. There have been many successful coalitions in the past that have worked very well. Anyone willing to do that has my respect. A coalition is simply the expression of the willingness of elected members to best represent their constituents as well as ensure stability to government when minority situations result from elections. When the electoral vote that the coalition represents exceeds the number of votes the 'top' party got, and is representative of the majority of the population, how can it be argued that they are somehow ursuping the will of the electorate?As for the Block not having any place in the decision making at the federal level - well - come on people. You are talking about people who represent more than a fifth of canadians. What their ultimate goal may be notwithstanding, they are still - at the moment - canadians. Perhaps if the representatives of each province voted for the interest of their province and their constituents rather than simply toeing to the party line, we would ultimately have a better confederation... and a government that realy works for the people.


Kamil (Ottawa South)
said

@Union Man: As supporter of Prime Minister I rather have Jack Layton in Opposition as I believe he would be more productive than having another Liberal in opposition. I know ideologies are different but they have worked well in past whereas Iggy hasn't even tried to make it work. Jack has political credibility and the other doesn't.


Ryan
said

I'm tired of harper and his BS about the coalition. I like how he thinks Iggy has pulled out of the 1-on-1 debate, when he was the coward to say no after Iggy accepted.


Finally Working
said

The coalition is a job demolition.


Open Heart Surgeon
said

Iggy's heart is not in it, Harper's heart is.


Its a sign !!
said

I see Iggy is now copying PM Harper and wearing his blue sweater on the campaign trail !!


Dayton
said

I've noticed one clear distinction between the 2 federal leaders. Harper's announcements either bring down taxes or create jobs. Iggy's announcements either raise taxes through new programs and I've yet to hear how he plans to create jobs other than social or civic related. Iggy someone has to pay for this. "The problem with socialism is you eventually run out of other peoples money." -Margaret Thatcher


Mike
said

I find it very funny that Jack is not attacking Iggy or the Block Party on their promises. I sure wonder if these three have a secret agreement that they will only go after Harper. Liggy is picking up points on the polls and Jack is loosing points in these polls to the Liberals yet Jack is still only going after Harper. I find this strange. I am starting to think that Iggy, Jack and Dueceppe do have a secret agreement to form a coalition if Harper does not get a majority and that makes me angry. If the Canadain people elect one party to govern they do not expect the other parties to join forces and hijack the over running the country. Hopefully one party will get a majority so this coalition crap will be put to bed once and for all. I just wish the G.G. would come out and say NO he will not allow a coalition government to run the country.


Gerry from M.B. but not N.D.P.
said

The left will take Canada down the road to soccialism just like Obama is in the U.S.A.


Michael
said

When is Ignatieff going to announce his carbon tax program? Carbon taxes have long been a part of his Liberal party platform. Have carbon taxes suddenly become a hidden agenda item on Ignatieff's platform? Will Ignatieff also deny carbon taxes are part of his platform only to introduce them later?


Liberal Lobster Boy Voting for Harper
said

This is the answer for the Maritimes. I voted Liberal last time and Harper this time.


Tommayy
said

Well, the liberals certainly can't be accused of originality. Lets take the red book from 1993, substitute the word helicopter with the word jets, and voila, one election platform. Unfortunately, all they managed to do with it the last time was cost us billions on cancellation fees, and ignore all of the other items on the platform. And, once again, the military got the shaft.


B.J.
said

Go Mr Harper you are the only one who can lead. Ignatieff does not have leadership qualities. He doesnt know what Canadians want altho he says he does, just a wind bag. Layton well him as PM wont happen. He should go and sit and watch on the sidelines, and ensure his health is OK


Michele (Toronto)
said

At the end of week one I don't think the west will elect a single Liberal candidate and the reason is they will not tolerate the possibility of a Bloc coalition running the country and catering to Quebec & Bloc demands. Liberals have not convinced anyone they won't seize government away from an elected Conservative minority on May 2nd. No coalition with a party of traitors is acceptable for the west or for Canadians.


Union Man
said

I predict the NDP as the offical opposition.


I like IG
said

The best thing about the first week was the Liberal strategy of taking the high ground and advertising positive messages instead of attack ads. My favourite commerical of theirs is "A Vote for Liberals is a vote for Ingnatief". which is very nice that he chose to become our Prime Minister since he has more education and experience than those other people do. No one speaks for the Liberal Party other than Iggy. Thank you.


Barb Vancouver, BC
said

Thumbs up for Canada and Harper.


Auto Worker in Hamilton
said

PM Harper has been offering the best social program so far Jobs jobs jobs! China is taking our jobs. If Ignatieff hiked Corporate taxes what gets cut your hours, your wage or your job?


HalifaxMD
said

Mr Harper wants to extend existing programs, good initiative, but it costs money, money that HE said wasnt in the budget, remember he said there was no room for negotiations...All of a sudden he has found some money???? He is not living up to his word, I cant trust him anymore, there is just too much evidence to the contrary.Mr Ignatieff,I like your ideas, keep being honest about having to pay off the conservitive's debt...dont promist too much. We can take it, we know, Canada is in debt.


Cambob in Toronto
said

May is going to sue to get onto the debates. Wouldn't that money be better spent to win her trivial little party at least one seat? The only reason the Green party has any support is because of her shrill appearance last time. Other than that, She represents an extreme fringe with about the same potential as the communists or the marjuana party. Zero.


Jaylene Winnnipeg
said

Prime Minister Harper is the only one that has to run a country and campaign and doing a great job of both. Mr. Ignatieff seems to be staying away from the words carbon tax and coalition but lectures Canada, give me a break. Dueceppe is making it clear he wants the coalition in power because he wants to wreck the country. Ignatieff, Layton and Duceppe don't attack each other makes for boring campaigns.


Wade Ens
said

First week shows Ignatieff does not know how to run a country but he would be a good school teacher.


dy
said

Is it just me, or is this campaign just about the silliest waste of time ever? Are we scraping the bottom of the barrel here in terms of candidates? Methinks so.The only positive outcome from this could be that we get the exact same result as the last time and all parties oust their current leaders.


Tom
said

Bad week for Harper. On the bright side he never needs to answer pesky questions from the general population. In that he has a 5 year unblemished record. Photo-op on!


BothSidesNow
said

Should read reckless conservatives. We don't need billions of dollars of jets, megaprisons and corporate giveaways. The trickle down the leg economic theory doesn't work. We have the resources...They will come.Banks are laying people off, not hiring.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Election 2011

CTV Election Central

Election Cental

Click here for latest news, blogs, polls, issues and more.

Election Results

Election Results

Extensive election results. Click here to find out who won in your riding.

Campaign Blog

Campaign Blog

Latest reports, photos and videos straight from the campaign trail.

Election 2011 at CTV News

Election 2011 at CTV News

In Pictures: CTV News team prepares for Monday's election special

Poll Tracker - Final

Poll Tracker

Follow the dots on our nightly poll, plus analysis by Nik Nanos.

the party, promo

The Party

How hard can it be to create a political party? Watch the episodes.

Leader Profiles

Leader Profiles

What's their strategy, and how have things changed since the last election?

CTV's Question Period

CTV's Question Period

Politicians under the gun. Newsmakers on the hotseat.

Power Play

Power Play

Don Martin with a fresh look at politics, politicians and plays.

Today's Top Stories

Former Liberian President Charles Taylor waits for the start of his sentencing judgement in the courtroom of the Special Court for Sierra Leone in Leidschendam, near The Hague, Netherlands, Wednesday May 30, 2012.  (AP / Toussaint Kluiters)

Charles Taylor gets 50 years for 'brutal' crimes

More   2 Comments 2    2 Video(s) 2

A police officer removes a package containing a human foot from the Conservative Party headquarters in Ottawa on Tuesday, May 29, 2012. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Police probe body parts in Ottawa, torso in Montreal

More    Comments    4 Video(s) 4

Supporters of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, hold placards and banners bearing images of him before the verdict was given in his extradition case at the Supreme Court in London, Wednesday, May 30, 2012. (AP / Matt Dunham)

Britain's top court backs extradition of WikiLeaks chief

More   4 Comments 4    2 Video(s) 2