News Sections
Gadhafi compound hit as Libya strikes go on
CTV News Video
|
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
Selected Comment
While it is true that Gadafi is a lunatic who should have been locked up decades ago, why is it suddenly alright for other countries to walk into a country and militarily depose its standing government? This is dangerous. Which government is next? Who now decides who runs what? If a government disagrees with the US then now it will be demolished. Is that what is going to happen? Look out Hugo, you'll be next.
Paul
Gadhafi vows 'long war' after U.S. and allies strike
talking about
Gadhafi compound hit as Libya strikes go on
CTV.ca News
Date: Sun. Mar. 20 2011 10:04 PM ET
A cruise missile smashed into an administrative building inside Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi's compound in Tripoli overnight Sunday, as international forces kept up their military bombardment. It wasn't clear where Gadhafi was at the time the missile landed.
The Libyan government escorted journalists from at least two major news outlets to the scene to view the damaged building, which stands near the iconic Bedouin tent where Gadhafi has been known to entertain foreign guests.
Half of the multistory building was destroyed, and scraps of metal from the missile lay scattered across the area.
Explosions and anti-aircraft gunfire had erupted in the Libyan capital earlier in the night, signaling another round of coalition air assaults.
The military operation began overnight Saturday to enforce a UN Security Council resolution that called for an immediate ceasefire in the fighting between Gadhafi forces and members of the month-old opposition movement.
The resolution authorized a no-fly zone above the North African country and allowed UN members to use "all means necessary" to prevent attacks on civilians.
Despite the international pressure, Gadhafi pledged Sunday to continue fighting. In a phone call to Libyan state television, he said his weapon depots had been opened up to allow civilians to arm themselves against the outsiders.
"We promise you a long war," Gadhafi said.
During a press conference at the Pentagon on Sunday afternoon, U.S. Navy Vice Adm. Bill Gortney said naval ships had launched 124 cruise missiles at military installations along the Libyan coast, followed by air assaults from French, British and American fighter jets and bombers against Gadhafi ground forces and air defences.
Gortney said the initial assault had been "very effective in significantly degrading the (Libyan) regime's air defence capability," including its ability to launch some surface-to-air missiles.
"We now have the capability to patrol the airspace over Libya, and we are doing just that," he told reporters.
Military forces from Spain, Belgium, Denmark and Qatar are joining the military operation under U.S. command, Gortney said, but a coalition of countries would take over command in the coming days.
Rebel reaction
The coalition air strikes provided some relief to residents of the Benghazi, the capital of the opposition movement that has been seeking to oust the Libyan leader.
On Saturday, at least 120 people were killed in the eastern city of 700,000 as Gadhafi troops staged ground raids and air assaults. But rebel forces said the attacks on Benghazi had since been stunted by international forces.
"Yesterday was a catastrophe," said Salwa el-Daghili, a member of the rebels' governing council. "Today, there is hope -- you can see it on the streets."
U.S. military officials said the international assault would take aim at any Gadhafi forces that were attacking the opposition. And one of their targets was a line of tanks that had been moving towards Benghazi when it was destroyed.
According to the opposition, the coalition attacks also struck an air force complex used by Gadhafi forces near Misrata, the last rebel-held city in the west, and a second air base outside Tripoli.
Meanwhile state television claimed that 48 people died in the U.S. and European strikes and that Gadhafi's supporters were converging on airports as human shields. Neither report could be independently verified.
The Arab League, whose support for a no-fly zone last week helped overcome reluctance in the West for action in Libya, criticized the military operation Sunday. Amr Moussa, the organization's secretary general, said that coalition assaults had gone beyond what his organization backed.
"What happened differs from the no-fly zone objectives," he said Sunday. "What we want is civilians' protection not shelling more civilians."
However, after holding an emergency meeting in Cairo late on Sunday, the Arab League reaffirmed its support for the no-fly zone. France also said Sunday that warplanes from the Arab nation of Qatar would take part in the international military strikes.
Libya's armed forces claimed for a second consecutive day that it had ordered a cease fie. However, its forces appeared again to continue fighting despite the announcement.
U.S. Admiral Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staffs, said the coalition can achieve its goals in Libya but there was a chance that Gadhafi would retain his hold on power.
Mullen said the goals of the military campaign in the North African nation "are limited and it isn't about seeing him go."
The coalition assault began shortly after an emergency military meeting was held in Paris earlier on Saturday.
The summit's 22 participants included UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon, senior representatives from Western nations, and the foreign ministers of Jordan, Morocco and the United Arab Emirates.
With files from The Associated Press
User Tools
Related Stories
Most Popular
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
No one is asking Brad Wall or Dalton to ride naked with them. Asking a politician to do this is sexist pure and simple, even if he was joking.
Email
Comments are now closed for this story
jk
said
David R. (Canada)
said
Albertan
said
eddytoronto
said
Hugh
said
Mike
said
Old Ted
said
Lorne
said
Zebulon Pike
said
Andrew
said
Get Real
said
Hannah In Nanaimo
said
alex
said
Mike vdB - Chatham, ON
said
Aaron in Guelph
said
D in L
said
alex
said
Linda In Vancouver
said
MS
said
Dave in Edmonton
said
firstMickey
said
Bowen
said
Steve in Vancouver
said
Rudy Haugeneder
said
When oil and huge oil reserves are involved, America and its Nato allies are quick to intervene militarily – claiming to protect civilians.
However, if no oil is involved, the West is silent, as in the case of the Hama massacre in February 1982, when the Syrian army bombarded the town of Hama in order to quell a revolt by the Muslim Brotherhood. An estimated 17,000 to 40,000 people were killed, including about 1,000 soldiers, according to Wikipedia . The attack has been described as possibly being “the single deadliest act by any Arab government against its own people in the modern Middle East – but nobody in America or Nato complained: there is no oil in Syria.
The automatic question that must be asked is whether Iran is next. The West openly supported Iraq in the Iran-Iraq war that lasted nearly eight years, from September of 1980 until August of 1988.
Casualty figures are highly uncertain, though estimates suggest more than one and a half million war and war-related casualties.
At the end, virtually none of the issues which are usually blamed for the war had been resolved. Will this be the case in Libya, even if Gaddafi is killed or captured?
Doug ( ^^^ ) Surrey,BC
said
Jon in London ON
said
RICHARD
said
kc-bby
said
J.C.
said
Dean H
said
Keep-out
said
TRex in AB
said
Chaz Salazaz
said
Joe Spumolio
said
Major Whyte
said
rose
said
Zebulon Pike
said
Kevin Driver
said
Rich
said
Anthony
said
The Village Idiot
said
Tim
said
Scott ON
said
flag wavers
said
Ian in Oshawa
said
Girard
said
eddytoronto
said
allan
said
Retired Soldier
said
MeInSaskatoon
said
davrec
said
zak
said
John MacPriest
said
Tim
said
Ian
said
Get Real
said
Gary Vermont
said
To the matter at hand...I am not a big supporter of my President but I will support him on this action even though I think he sat on the fence for too long as is his usual style or lack thereof...I am a bit concerned that the U.N. mandate is not broad enough to allow boots on the ground if need be as the rebels will still be largely out gunned lest we the coalition supply them with better weaponry for a march on Tripoli..Again this is not mandated
NS
said
Barry
said
eddytoronto
said
Paul
said
Lz in Edmonton
said
eddytoronto
said
eddytoronto
said