Top Stories -   

1
Libyan rebels celebrate with an army cap from a soldier loyal to Moammar Gadhafi in the outskirts of Benghazi, eastern Libya, Sunday, March 20, 2011. (AP / Anja Niedringhaus) Libyan soldiers survey the damage to an administrative building hit by a missile late Sunday in the heart of Moammar Gadhafi's Bab Al Azizia compound in Tripoli, Libya, early Monday, March 21, 2011 as they are pictured during an organized trip by the Libyan authorities. (AP / Jerome Delay) Libyan men demonstrate their support for Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi as they wait for the bodies of 26 people said to be killed during overnight air raids to arrive for burial in Tripoli, Sunday, March 20, 2011. (AP / Jerome Delay) A Libyan man prays in front a destroyed tank on the outskirts of Benghazi, eastern Libya, Sunday, March 20, 2011. (AP / Anja Niedringhaus) Libyan people celebrate on a tank belonging to the forces of Moammar Gadhafi in the outskirts of Benghazi, eastern Libya, Sunday, March 20, 2011. (AP / Anja Niedringhaus) A French Air Force Rafale jet fighter landing at the military base of Saint Dizier, eastern France, Saturday, March 19, 2011, back from a mission over Libya. (AP / ECPAD, Sebastien Dupont) An F-18 jet fighter flies over the Nato airbase in Aviano, Italy, Sunday, March 20, 2011. (AP / Luca Bruno) A warplane of Gadhafi's forces is seen being shot down with the pilot parachuting out of it over the outskirts of Benghazi, eastern Libya, Saturday, March 19, 2011. (AP / Anja Niedringhaus) airstrike; Libya; fighter jet

Gadhafi compound hit as Libya strikes go on

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV National News: Ben O'Hara-Byrne in Cairo
The situation in Libya remains unpredictable as the country's leader, Moammar Gadhafi, vows to continue fighting. A CTV National News correspondent says that, even so, rebels in the east were celebrating.
CTV National News: Joy Malbon on the strike
The French may have fired on the Libyan regime first, but the U.S. soon unleashed heavy firepower from the sea. Still, the White House insists this is not an American operation.
CTV News Channel: Errol Mendes, professor
Errol Mendes, a professor at University of Ottawa says what Gadhafi is trying to do with the ceasefire promise is to consolidate his powerbase in Tripoli and other parts of west Libya.
CTV News Channel: Bill Gortney, pentagon official
The director of the Joint Chiefs of Staff discusses the latest on the U.S. military efforts ongoing in Libya. He explains they are not going after Gadhafi and that Libyan forces are more pressed than before.
CTV News Channel: Fen Hampson, NPSIA
A representative from the Norman Patterson School of International Affairs discusses why military efforts in Libya are not aiming to go after Gadhafi and his residents.
CTV News Channel: John Thompson, analyst
An analyst with the Mackenzie Institute says the UN order to carry out a no-fly zone over Libya was more robust than most people expected, as it allowed for attacks on military vehicles used against civilians.
CTV News Channel: Anthony Seaboyer, expert
A national security expert at Queen's University says the unrest in Libya will likely continue on for weeks, and the no-fly zone will play a major role in stopping attacks against civilians.
Extended: Air strike aftermath in Benghazi
Sunday: A bus is seen engulfed in flames and rebels celebrate the military airstrikes against Gadhafi forces.
Extended: Rebels in Benghazi celebrate
Sunday: Burnt military vehicles sit are seen in eastern Libya after overnight air strikes. Meanwhile, rebels in Benghazi celebrate the attack.
Extended: Gunfire in Tripoli
Sunday: The sound of anti-aircraft gunfire and explosions are heard overnight in Tripoli, Libya.
CTV News Channel: Simon Brooks, ICRC
A spokesperson in Benghazi says he hears military activity in the area and describes the tactical approach against Libya as an 'indiscriminate targeting of civilians'.
CTV News Channel: ABC's Alex Marquardt
An ABC correspondent in Libya says the eastern part of the country is mostly peaceful, and Libyans are grateful for the international response. Meanwhile, Gadhafi will likely continue to order attacks on rebels.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (64) Facebook   

Libyan rebels celebrate with an army cap from a soldier loyal to Moammar Gadhafi in the outskirts of Benghazi, eastern Libya, Sunday, March 20, 2011. (AP / Anja Niedringhaus) Libyan soldiers survey the damage to an administrative building hit by a missile late Sunday in the heart of Moammar Gadhafi's Bab Al Azizia compound in Tripoli, Libya, early Monday, March 21, 2011 as they are pictured during an organized trip by the Libyan authorities. (AP / Jerome Delay) Libyan men demonstrate their support for Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi as they wait for the bodies of 26 people said to be killed during overnight air raids to arrive for burial in Tripoli, Sunday, March 20, 2011. (AP / Jerome Delay) A Libyan man prays in front a destroyed tank on the outskirts of Benghazi, eastern Libya, Sunday, March 20, 2011. (AP / Anja Niedringhaus) Libyan people celebrate on a tank belonging to the forces of Moammar Gadhafi in the outskirts of Benghazi, eastern Libya, Sunday, March 20, 2011. (AP / Anja Niedringhaus) A French Air Force Rafale jet fighter landing at the military base of Saint Dizier, eastern France, Saturday, March 19, 2011, back from a mission over Libya. (AP / ECPAD, Sebastien Dupont) An F-18 jet fighter flies over the Nato airbase in Aviano, Italy, Sunday, March 20, 2011. (AP / Luca Bruno) A warplane of Gadhafi's forces is seen being shot down with the pilot parachuting out of it over the outskirts of Benghazi, eastern Libya, Saturday, March 19, 2011. (AP / Anja Niedringhaus) airstrike; Libya; fighter jet

Photos

Libyan rebels celebrate with an army cap from a soldier loyal to Moammar Gadhafi in the outskirts of Benghazi, eastern Libya, Sunday, March 20, 2011. (AP / Anja Niedringhaus)

View Larger Image

More on this topic

Selected Comment

While it is true that Gadafi is a lunatic who should have been locked up decades ago, why is it suddenly alright for other countries to walk into a country and militarily depose its standing government? This is dangerous. Which government is next? Who now decides who runs what? If a government disagrees with the US then now it will be demolished. Is that what is going to happen? Look out Hugo, you'll be next.

Paul

Gadhafi vows 'long war' after U.S. and allies strike

talking about
Gadhafi compound hit as Libya strikes go on

Date: Sun. Mar. 20 2011 10:04 PM ET

A cruise missile smashed into an administrative building inside Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi's compound in Tripoli overnight Sunday, as international forces kept up their military bombardment. It wasn't clear where Gadhafi was at the time the missile landed.

The Libyan government escorted journalists from at least two major news outlets to the scene to view the damaged building, which stands near the iconic Bedouin tent where Gadhafi has been known to entertain foreign guests.

Half of the multistory building was destroyed, and scraps of metal from the missile lay scattered across the area.

Explosions and anti-aircraft gunfire had erupted in the Libyan capital earlier in the night, signaling another round of coalition air assaults.

The military operation began overnight Saturday to enforce a UN Security Council resolution that called for an immediate ceasefire in the fighting between Gadhafi forces and members of the month-old opposition movement.

The resolution authorized a no-fly zone above the North African country and allowed UN members to use "all means necessary" to prevent attacks on civilians.

Despite the international pressure, Gadhafi pledged Sunday to continue fighting. In a phone call to Libyan state television, he said his weapon depots had been opened up to allow civilians to arm themselves against the outsiders.

"We promise you a long war," Gadhafi said.

During a press conference at the Pentagon on Sunday afternoon, U.S. Navy Vice Adm. Bill Gortney said naval ships had launched 124 cruise missiles at military installations along the Libyan coast, followed by air assaults from French, British and American fighter jets and bombers against Gadhafi ground forces and air defences.

Gortney said the initial assault had been "very effective in significantly degrading the (Libyan) regime's air defence capability," including its ability to launch some surface-to-air missiles.

"We now have the capability to patrol the airspace over Libya, and we are doing just that," he told reporters.

Military forces from Spain, Belgium, Denmark and Qatar are joining the military operation under U.S. command, Gortney said, but a coalition of countries would take over command in the coming days.

Rebel reaction

The coalition air strikes provided some relief to residents of the Benghazi, the capital of the opposition movement that has been seeking to oust the Libyan leader.

On Saturday, at least 120 people were killed in the eastern city of 700,000 as Gadhafi troops staged ground raids and air assaults. But rebel forces said the attacks on Benghazi had since been stunted by international forces.

"Yesterday was a catastrophe," said Salwa el-Daghili, a member of the rebels' governing council. "Today, there is hope -- you can see it on the streets."

U.S. military officials said the international assault would take aim at any Gadhafi forces that were attacking the opposition. And one of their targets was a line of tanks that had been moving towards Benghazi when it was destroyed.

According to the opposition, the coalition attacks also struck an air force complex used by Gadhafi forces near Misrata, the last rebel-held city in the west, and a second air base outside Tripoli.

Meanwhile state television claimed that 48 people died in the U.S. and European strikes and that Gadhafi's supporters were converging on airports as human shields. Neither report could be independently verified.

The Arab League, whose support for a no-fly zone last week helped overcome reluctance in the West for action in Libya, criticized the military operation Sunday. Amr Moussa, the organization's secretary general, said that coalition assaults had gone beyond what his organization backed.

"What happened differs from the no-fly zone objectives," he said Sunday. "What we want is civilians' protection not shelling more civilians."

However, after holding an emergency meeting in Cairo late on Sunday, the Arab League reaffirmed its support for the no-fly zone. France also said Sunday that warplanes from the Arab nation of Qatar would take part in the international military strikes.

Libya's armed forces claimed for a second consecutive day that it had ordered a cease fie. However, its forces appeared again to continue fighting despite the announcement.

U.S. Admiral Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staffs, said the coalition can achieve its goals in Libya but there was a chance that Gadhafi would retain his hold on power.

Mullen said the goals of the military campaign in the North African nation "are limited and it isn't about seeing him go."

The coalition assault began shortly after an emergency military meeting was held in Paris earlier on Saturday.

The summit's 22 participants included UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon, senior representatives from Western nations, and the foreign ministers of Jordan, Morocco and the United Arab Emirates.

With files from The Associated Press

Comments are now closed for this story

jk
said

1. Nice of Harper to spotlight and highlight Canada in anti-western terrorists' minds.2. Canadians were not asked, in this democracy, how they'd prefer their own hard-earned tax dollars spent: on bombs or pension or healthcare.3. Once the Gadaffi structure is removed, endless conflict will fill the desert airs.


David R. (Canada)
said

So, is the UN going into Syria next? They're shooting their citizens in the streets too!Oh, no, I forgot. Gadaffi was fighting terrorists; Syria is providing and arming terrorists.The US has now turned it's back on numerous former allies; The Shah of Iran, Mubarack, Gadaffi. Who's next? Israel? Afghanistan? Iraq? S. Korea?


Albertan
said

I bet the trouble makers are the France, US, Brit. Oh, we come in to help out the civilians, support of democracy, human rights and bs bs bs. The real reason is "we want to make them pay, make them suffer if Libya is not our puppet"


eddytoronto
said

Just 1 yr ago Gadhafi was all Hugs and Pics with ,Silvio Berlusconi, Nicolas Sarkozy, Dmitriy Medvedev, Barack Obama, Ban Ki-Moon and Jose Eduardo dos Santos...Guess who was the best dressed award given to?..Personally I dont like Star Trek costumes...Look they were longtime allies ..Lol .... How long will this take, and at what cost....Once you start this you can never go back Harper...Where are the Jobs Harper?......... Japan Struggles To Deal With Nuclear Crisis And Tsunami ....Wake Up....


Hugh
said

Pull the Canadian and all Nato planes out and let the damned Arab League do themself.


Mike
said

Prior to the actual start of the campaign, everyone was screaming for the west to step in and help the protesters, now that we are everyone is screaming about evil western oil interests and conspiracy. Which is it? do we get involved or stay out. You can only do one or the other. Not both


Old Ted
said

Saddam promised the "mother of all wars" when attacked. He just wasn't around long enough to see it all. Perhaps Kadhafit will meet the same fate.


Lorne
said

I thought that the "no-fly" zone was to be enforced. I don't recall anything about attacking Libya - yet missiles are flying and attacks are being made by the international force.Is this the Nostradameous effect? Is Obama that 3rd person in the prophecy that will start another world war? Could be.


Zebulon Pike
said

It is rather sad that people say the US 'has never gone to war for altruistic reasons." Has any country ever gone to war for altruistic reasons? Is such a thing even possible? To say this is ridiculous. Someone may benefit from the action, but someone will always lose. Pathetic. Oh yeah, never say that Canada is some sort of vassal meekly obeying the US. Vassals resist control by others, they do not willingly cooperate with them. Still, good hunting to the Coalition - let Daffy Duck fall into international hands with a minimal loss of life and property.


Andrew
said

Had anybody thought about how this will impact our reputation as the true north and strong? We don't allow a nation to undergo its own revolution; we stop governments from intervening on their own affairs. We are intervening on foreign matters. It has been shown once and again what would happen when we intervene on foreign matters, despite the best hopes, what happened in Vietnam, and Afghanistan. Members of our troops and military are going to be injured or even killed and we will have to pay for this. We will have pay for this through our taxes, our reputation and our men and women this country. We are doing this when we haven't our economy stabilized and election looming. We should focus on our own issues before intervening on foreign matters.


Get Real
said

In one earlier post I said it would take a week for the UAE to claim that Allies killed civilians,, sorry,, It took one day!!


Hannah In Nanaimo
said

It seems to me that all the nations of the world are playing out Nostradamus's predictions for world war three. We are in it now but it just hasn't been named yet. We, in the free world cannot force our beliefs on the rest of the world and expect they are going to go along with it. It just doesn't work. I would love to know that no one is being tortured or killed by their own government. But intervention has a cost. The lives of all the peoples of the world are at stake when you play with the "big guns". I just don't want to die, or see my family die.


alex
said

according to cnn, sunday march 20 the arab league is now on the same page with the west on the no fly zone. this is good to hear, they need to support the west and let gadaffi know that his actions will not be tollerated any longer.


Mike vdB - Chatham, ON
said

This should have been an Arab League and African Union initiative and *NOT* a Western initiative. We can no longer afford to stretch our military to the breaking point while other organizations sit back to let us do their dirty work and then criticize how the job was done. This could very easily go south and spark another wider war that we all get caught up in.


Aaron in Guelph
said

Now the ARAB league is criticizing the no fly zone?!Aren't they the ones who essentially asked for it in the first place?


D in L
said

Given how many countries need - and have needed - our help while we (and the UN) looked the other way, to believe that we are attacking Libya "to provide humanitarian aid" is not just naive - it is idiotic. WE are attacking Libya for the same reason Afghanistan and Iraq were invaded and occupied: to assume control over their resources.


alex
said

the arab league,russia and china cant have their cake and eat it to. they whined about a no fly zone.with the nofly zone comes other conditions like keeping libian troops ftom fireing on civilians,knocking out air defence systems. let the arab league enforce the no fly zone. pull the west out, tell the bleeding hearts take care of it yourself.


Linda In Vancouver
said

I guess I'm to much the motherly type.I worry about all the men and women we sent to the other side of the planet to engage in battles with people who have no scruples.Afet all this time In Afghanistan,I'm tired of the worry.Burned into my memory is a photo of a little girl crying her eyes out as tehy buried her father.It's a disturbing reminder of the words spoken by Nichola Goddard's father,when he buried his daughter. He said "from this day forward there will be two kinds of Canadians.Those who knew her,and those who wish they knew her".I hear those words every day these conflict go on,and can't help wanting to know,who are these people who sitck their necks all the way out,on behalf of our country? I wish I really knew each and every one of them,and the families that raised them Not to worry.I know perfectly well that we cannot sit in Canada,all fat,dumb,and happy,and whine on about human rights abuses in some parts of the world,and not be prepared to do something about it,when we can.We are relatively safe with our rights,which we have because our ancestors fought for them,and passed them on to us.The right thing to do is,"remeber them",and do our best to pass on these rights to other people with the same desires.It's painful,at times.But it's miles ahead of the pompous,self righteous crowing that is all to common with the "I've got mine,you get yours" crowd. Canada must stand with it's allies.They will then stand with our children and grandchildren should they find themsleves in need. GOD BLESS ALL WHO SERVE.Please come home safely.We love you all.If we don't say it often enough,that is our shame. PRO PATRIA


MS
said

I am not from Libya or Gaza; however, hundreds of civilians were bombed by Israeli planes and the world watched and called it retaliation/self defense. Why now the coalition are calling for democracy...what happed to the Gaza democracy and the civilians?.MS-Toronto


Dave in Edmonton
said

I find it sad that many take this subject as a chance to attack the party they have the most hatred for, rather than seeing this as a subject that unites Canadians and something we can have an honest debate about... Shame on CTV for posting such partisan comments, I can't imagine those were the only people who posted and that you choose the best of bunch, if that is the case then clearly Canada needs an about face on it's priorities...


firstMickey
said

Gauche-Daffy has the money for an extended war and since he murders his own people, uses mercenaries, etc., a person with his (lack of) morals would be happy with a long and miserable war. Can anybody just plain zap him?


Bowen
said

Dear Steve,On one hand you get it right then you go and make your comment on Liberals? WTF man. Conservatives have their roots in Fascism. Then there's the issues we face with Hegomony, Plutonomy, and Oilergists. Dude you have no clue, Just a bias you assert because you want to fit in without having to think for yourself. Quit advocating for ego and give your head a shake son, Our government here in Canada is doing some really stupid things, and yes people that are suppose to regulate are being censored, I'M ONE! Quit voting conservative you looser.


Steve in Vancouver
said

Mankind has always been beset by wars. Nothing has changed here. Another dictator needs to be over thrown. He has over reached his limits. It was a matter of time. The Wests intentions are good and supported by the Arab league. This Libyan dictator could of done the right thing and had a heart attach ten years ago. Any ways no one is perfect, its not a perfect world. Down with all dictators. And on a lighter note lets end the Liberal tyranny of kangaroo courts. Next election give Liberals no votes.


Rudy Haugeneder
said

Is Nato saving civilians or its oil supplies?
When oil and huge oil reserves are involved, America and its Nato allies are quick to intervene militarily – claiming to protect civilians.
However, if no oil is involved, the West is silent, as in the case of the Hama massacre in February 1982, when the Syrian army bombarded the town of Hama in order to quell a revolt by the Muslim Brotherhood. An estimated 17,000 to 40,000 people were killed, including about 1,000 soldiers, according to Wikipedia . The attack has been described as possibly being “the single deadliest act by any Arab government against its own people in the modern Middle East – but nobody in America or Nato complained: there is no oil in Syria.
The automatic question that must be asked is whether Iran is next. The West openly supported Iraq in the Iran-Iraq war that lasted nearly eight years, from September of 1980 until August of 1988.
Casualty figures are highly uncertain, though estimates suggest more than one and a half million war and war-related casualties.
At the end, virtually none of the issues which are usually blamed for the war had been resolved. Will this be the case in Libya, even if Gaddafi is killed or captured?


Doug ( ^^^ ) Surrey,BC
said

I think you have it right "NS".As far as I can understand from the very mixed bag of news around this,that wass always the intention.But it must be rememebered,this tactic has been used in the past,and it almost always takes longer than expected.Then,even if it does come off as planned,all involved,including NATO and the UN,have to discuss the slippery slope concerns expressed by "Paul". But those questions have always been there.I do not think any of them have just one right answer.As unsettling as it is,I think the UN is the only forum to debte them,and that every decision will have to be made on an individual basis. For now,the "rebe;s" are happy.But will they be happy in a few of them die as a result? And who are these "rebels",exactly? What will Libya look like if they take over? It seems to me,that a democratic Libya is not a slam dunk,no matter how this turns out.All this does,if successful,is re-set the clock,and give Libyans a chance to chart a new path.Hopefully,the people of Libya and Egypt are up to the task.It would be a shame if they were liberated from one dictator,only to fall victim to another one.Democratic institutions and human rights are not something that usually come quickly.Both take time to evolve. Actually,"Get Real",we have heard from the Russians.Yo must have missed some of the news.Originally,they were against this mission, then they stopped objecting,and absatained from the vote.As did China.Read what you want into that,but it tells me they don't have the cajones to take a stand either way.That lets them whine if it goes badly,or take credit if it goes well. LOL !!! In Canada,we call people like that either Liberals or New Democrats.


Jon in London ON
said

True: The outrage is not “ubiquitous,†but what are lefties going to do? They got nowhere to go. They backed the most left-wing nominee in the Democratic Party’s history — yes, Obama is further left than McGovern or Dukakis — and actually managed to get him elected. And the result is . . . ?? We’re still in Iraq and Afghanistan. Guantanamo is still in business. Bradley Manning is stripped naked in solitary confinement. Now, another military adventure. You’d think that people who’d been so blatantly screwed over, bamboozled, sold out, ripped off and stabbed in the back would eventually wise up. But then again: They’re liberals.


RICHARD
said

Eddy my man, Libya is not the largest producer of oil on the African continent. They produce around 2% of the global supply. Sudan is far more oil-rich but the Chinese have set-up shop there. Yea, this whole thing reminds me of Iraq. Western countries attack one side while apparently another exists and feels wronged. Then you get a long, unwinnable war. But really, I don't care. Africa sucks and politicians are idiots. Nothing new here.


kc-bby
said

Fire a missile into Gadaffi's house. Isn't that the most efficient way of taking care of the problem - and he is the heart of the problem. I don't understand why they would fire of dozens of very very very very expensive missiles onto some old school tanks when Ghadaffi is right there! Why waste so much money and innocent lives? Leaders should have any special status. They are bat crazy like the rest of us.


J.C.
said

The decision to enforce a no fly zone was taken by the UN and not individual countries. The coalition is made up of 22 countries including the Arab nations not one or two. If they had stood aside as they did in the past (Zwanda comes to mind) many people would have been slaughtered. Canada does not purchase any oil from Libya!! This is not just a USA action. French planes were the first to strike and not the US, however the US and Britain has in the area what is needed to knock out quickly (Tomahawk missiles,etc.) Ghadafi's military superiority over the rebels, who only turned to force after their peaceful protests were fired upon by Ghadafi. Anyone who has followed the news lately would know that a "no fly zone" would mean to do this in order to alleviate damage to the coalitions planes. Certainly the UN was well aware of this before they agreed to it. I'm sorry "eddyfromtoronto" but I have to tatally disagree with your interpretation of what is currently occurring there and what the intentions of the coalition is.


Dean H
said

Sometimes the reasons given for military action, are in fact, the actual reasons. The UN resolution in this case is reasonable when a country's leadership is using its military to pummel its citizens. No one in this country would tolerate the conditions that the average Libyan citizen must live with, and they deserve our support. This is not a fair fight, from their point of view, and our assistance levels the playing field. We were asked for assistance this time, and it was not under the false pretence of weapons of mass destruction. That is what makes it different. Ghadafi has a choice. Stop his offensive, and the coalition bombing will stop. He has decided otherwise, and will have to accept the consequences.


Keep-out
said

The west think they can do anything they feel like. I hope Soviet and China and other countries will chip in support for Libya and teach US, Brit and France a lesson.


TRex in AB
said

Alberta produces 2,750,000 bbl/d. Better start up the Alberta National Guard in case someone wants to invade and take our oil!


Chaz Salazaz
said

Great! Another war Canada is fighting in!


Joe Spumolio
said

I agree with eddytoronto. The United States has never, ever in it's history waged a war for purely altruistic reasons. There is always some underlying, sometimes hidden, strategic advantage to any US military action. Yet here we are again with a US led cavalry, coming over the hill John Wayne style just in the nick of time to save the outgunned hero cowboy from all them bad injuns.Just as in Iraq the reason for this military action is pretty obvious...oil. Just once it would be nice if the Americans would let the Arab world deal with their own messes and stop playing global cop. The US and it's allies don't seem to get the fact that every time they make war onMuslim lands they give rise to a whole new wave of extremism that ties up another generation of Western youth fighting a war they didn't even have a hand in starting. I agree that Gadhafi is a blood thirsty lunatic who should have been killed after Pan Am 103, just as Saddam Hussein should have been killed when he launched mustard gas on the Kurds...but he wasn't. He was left in power and allowed to become easily the richest man in the world by selling oil to European and American oil companies. Left in power to buy weapons from the French and Russians. Left in power to abuse his own people for over 40 years.All of a sudden, 23 years after the Gadhafi regime murdered 270 people with a bomb on an airliner, this is the last straw? It's actions such as this that destroy any and all credibility Westerners have in the Muslim world. The optics on this are terrible from the Muslim stand point. That's why people claim this is about the oil, because it is.


Major Whyte
said

" History teaches us that men and nations behave wisely once they have exhausted all other alternatives." Abba Eban an extremely wise Israeli diplomat..


rose
said

I would like to know who the rebels are ! You should leave mad dog of the middle east.


Zebulon Pike
said

Here's your hope and change!MARCH 19, 2003BUSH: ‘American and coalition forces are in the early stages of military operations to disarm Iraq, to free its people and to defend the world from grave danger…MARCH 19, 2011OBAMA: ‘Today we are part of a broad coalition. We are answering the calls of a threatened people. And we are acting in the interests of the United States and the world’...


Kevin Driver
said

To eddytoronto ; It was the Liberals who sent us to Afghanistan. To the rest of the conspiracy theorist all I can say is WOW you people are out there!!!!!


Rich
said

And Obama is different then the much hated Bush how?


Anthony
said

There is no question in my mind that it's time for this deranged megalomaniac to go, one way - or the other, and rather sooner than later !


The Village Idiot
said

Long war...eh? With what his band of over-weight army of virgins who all look like "Nell" on the hit 80s TV show "Gimme a Break!"?


Tim
said

Paul said "... why is it suddenly alright for other countries to walk into a country and militarily depose its standing government?"Because it's well known that the "standing government" of Gadhafi is using hired foreign mercenaries to kill his own people. Gadhafi doesn't have the support of most of his own people so he's hired mercenaries from the rest of Africa to put down his own people. Is that okay in your view of things?


Scott ON
said

We'll listen to all of the left wing conspiracy theorists comment on the subject I'm sure. But Lybians want freedom, just as the Egyptians did recently and as the Iraqi people are now starting to embrace. This 'freedom agenda' started with Bush ( yes the one you all love to call stupid and a warmonger ), and freedom from tyranny will be his legacy by many. By freeing the people, you open up so many doors and the more doors that are open the less likely that one will be seduce by extremists. I was never a fan of George W. Bush but after doing some independent research, instead of relying on what was fed to me by the media left, I realized that he will probably one day go down as one of the presidential greats. Mark my words. I agree 100% that intervention is needed in Lybia, but as another poster said, they need the mandate to put boots on the ground or it'll be for naught.


flag wavers
said

Only difference between Iraq and Libya is the two faced left are in on this invasion.As ugly as war mongering neocons are at least they are consistent.Anyone who had the displeasure of viewing the US Sunday talking heads this morning saw all the military complex talking heads resurrected.They are worse than recurring Halloween flicks.And please stop with this is not a US led agenda.Turn your empty skulls to the fact a US general is running the operation and 90% of fire power coming from American military.Stop and think for one second instead of repeating talking points like mindless drones!50 slaughtered and 100s winged on first day.Proud of yourselves flag wavers?


Ian in Oshawa
said

@IanThe reason that this is a different scenario is because Iraq was a war based on insubstancial evidence at the time (Fraudulent evidence as it has now been revealed) about chemical weapons and being a threat to the world. It turns out that he wasn't a threat and in a mismanaged war killed many tens of thousands of civilians. Now, the case with Libya is that it is a confirmed case of a dictator slaughtering his own people, promising to torture and kill dissidents which will likely number in the thousands if not tens of thousands. The reason so many people on the left support this is that they can't stand to see our governments stand idly by as this slaughter continues. The left laments the fact that it has not happened sooner because that means more civilians and rebels would have lived had there been intervention. I will also point out that this is not an invasion. No troops have been put on the ground and nobody has invaded anywhere. As a final pointer, our prime minister is to the right and I do believe he's done the correct thing by helping out here.


Girard
said

Many of you so called military experts some how believe that it was the United States that provided Libya with all of their modern military equipment. Maybe you haven't noticed, but all the military assets that Libya is using are all "RUSSIAN". I have never seen a T-72 tank, a SA-5, BMP, BRDM's ever made or used by the west. They are all Russian military hardware. The United States does not give Libya one red cent of anything because of Gadhaffi being the madman he is. Whats next, are you people going to start blaming Israel for this mess in Libya as well? Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but I find that most opinions from people on here is nothing more that uneducated trash talk.


eddytoronto
said

Infiltrating, corrupting, and turning the entire planet, one nation at a time in a combined scientific-geopolitical dictatorship that will be effectively impossible to reverse once it is completed. Western-fueled conflagration in the Arab world indicates an accelerated regional strategy of destabilizing and taking over target nations. Nations like Russia and China, whose interests are being directly threatened and stripped away in this malicious melee, appear powerless and unprepared. Some nations succumb in silence behind the scenes, others are invaded, mercilessly brutalized, and assimilated .Each nation that falls, however far it empowers and emboldens them .They have created a perfect system, a strategy of tension, where we wrestle with one battle after another, and we also have to go to work and school etc...We all to one degree or another help advance them by playing high frequency Lotteries(OLGC) having paper insted of Gold and Silver(Sound Money) ,they steal from our pensions to fund Illegal Wars(not following Constitution). CTV has made gains in exposing and delegitimizing (telling the Truth) but need to do a little more...The tragedy playing out between the duped and misled people of Israel and the besieged Palestinians is an example of where they have created the perfect, unsolvable conflict. The very fake War on Terror is another example. We get caught up in the details, we pick sides we expend energy fighting these battles and we lose sight within this puppet theater of the men pulling the strings above. Your Children and Grand-children will not have what you had or better unless we start to take care of Canada. Nobody hurt Canada or its citizens Harper!Ground the jets save millions we need new washrooms in the Hospital they are breaking down...Just like Japan relics...Insted of upgrading ..They choose War... You deserve the Goverment you Get


allan
said

It looks like the so-called Arab League is turning against us already. Arab states cannot be trusted to be our allies, and we are again sucked in to fight, die, and pay for their stupidity once again.China and Russia are the smart ones who know enough to stay away from these lunatics


Retired Soldier
said

Many of you do not understand that it was the Arab League of Nations who asked the security council at the UN for resolution 1973 and it is why the western countries involved would not participate in any of these strikes unless the Arab League of Nations participated militarily as well. This has nothing to do with oil. International law makes a government of any country illegal if it turns it's military forces against it's own people and begin to kill them. EddyinToronto, you sound to me as if you are one of these people who are a whiner and complainer about everything and everybody but have never had to live or go through the horrors of war. People on here who moan and complain about western imperialistic forces trying to protect an innocent civilian population from being slaughtered at the hands of a madman is wrong? Obviously you have never had to serve in a country such as this. How brave you must be to only have had to sit in front of your monitors and type away a bunch of nonsense with absolutely no experience in these matters whatsoever.


MeInSaskatoon
said

Why is it that, whenever there is reporting done about human rights, someone starts ranting about the "liberal biased media"? Do conservatives everywhere not believe in human rights? Why is the word "liberal" used as an insult by those who support war?I'm sure nobody wants yet another war. But, there are crazies in every area of the world - dictators who either build their regimes on their unbending law, like the leaders of Libya and Iraq, or dictators who attack the basic human rights of the poor in places like Wisconsin, making MORE government for some, while the elite eat to do whatever they want.I dunno. There is stupidity in every political party, everywhere on earth. I guess it's just how the leaders of that party go about implementing their stupidity.


davrec
said

Reagan should have finished Gadhafi off in the early 80's when oil and going to war was cheaper.


zak
said

no fly zone ok ! but attaching ? its a big mistake ! by the way who are we supporting? the rebels??? mistake !!!!


John MacPriest
said

@Lz in Edmonton. I suppose that you know which house should be the target?????


Tim
said

Barry said "Some people say 'it's a fight for oil'! It's not! There are 7 oil exporting countries, (there are more countries, but I just used 7!), that produce a total of 28.9 million barrels of oil per day. Of that total, Lybia contributes 1.2 million barrels!"It is the typical argument of Saddam and probably now Gadhafi apologists that this is all about oil. Considering that Libya is, like you wrote, only a minor oil producing nation and ranks only 17th in the world for oil production, it's clearly a case of supporting the rebels against a brutal dictator. I've already seen the tired ol' arguments about "It's about the oil" here on CTV's site.


Ian
said

This seems not much different than Iraq. The only difference being that the hated Bush was the President at the time. I haven't heard one single comment about "an American Invasion". Sadam Hussein was killing his own people by the thousands but Bush was criticized left, right (not so much by the right) and center for going into Iraq. Why is this any different today in Libya? I listen to the Left leaning radio hosts who are lamenting the fact that the west is taking so long to go into Libya. It must be OK when the President is a Democrat I guess.


Get Real
said

Mark my words, at this very moment, a lot of people happy! In two weeks from now, a lot of innocent people were killed by the Allies and the bad bad Americans, in a month from now: Jihad against the Allies and the world saying the same boring redundant phrase OIL RICH COUNTRY, OIL RICH COUNTRY. I wonder, is Russia supporting the Allies or Libya, weird we have not heard from them and what its position is.


Gary Vermont
said

First off I have to tell you I am impressed with CTV reporting... I''m an American coming to this site to get some in-country reporting... As well I like the video setup here as it shows videos on the issue in auto sequence... Well done.

To the matter at hand...I am not a big supporter of my President but I will support him on this action even though I think he sat on the fence for too long as is his usual style or lack thereof...I am a bit concerned that the U.N. mandate is not broad enough to allow boots on the ground if need be as the rebels will still be largely out gunned lest we the coalition supply them with better weaponry for a march on Tripoli..Again this is not mandated


NS
said

Hopefully the Rebels can gain the strength they need now to take out that dictator!


Barry
said

Some people say 'it's a fight for oil'! It's not! There are 7 oil exporting countries, (there are more countries, but I just used 7!), that produce a total of 28.9 million barrels of oil per day. Of that total, Lybia contributes 1.2 million barrels! They have had problems with this guy in the past, they gave hin a chance, he blew it! Much like Saddam, and his two idiot sons, when they find him, execute him! You may say, justice must be tempered with mercy, and I agree!, but how much mercy Ghadafi shown to others?


eddytoronto
said

The whole farce mirrors Bill Clinton bombing campaigns in Bosnia and Serbia, which were also about helping Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda to topple autocratic but relatively moderate regimes, and were also military conquests packaged in the cloak of "Humanitarian" deception .We have to anticipate and be prepared ...Buy Gold and Silver this is So,So Important..if you dont have money for that...Stock up on Food Now...


Paul
said

While it is true that Gadafi is a lunatic who should have been locked up decades ago, why is it suddenly alright for other countries to walk into a country and militarily depose its standing government? This is dangerous. Which government is next? Who now decides who runs what? If a government disagrees with the US then now it will be demolished. Is that what is going to happen? Look out Hugo, you'll be next.


Lz in Edmonton
said

What I don't understand is one strategic bomb on the house of Gahafi would eliminate the need for a no fly zone? Why waste the time?


eddytoronto
said

The UN-backed air strikes have absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with protecting the human rights of protesters. The air strikes and Tomahawk missiles have been launched in support of terrorist cells so that the US military industrial complex can repeat its age old trick of installing a radical Islamic regime which they can later overthrow, giving them strategic access to the region and allowing them to control the largest oil reserves on the African continent. This is about giving war a new facelift, leaving the new world order free to pillage any country they like in the name of humanitarian assistance.It’s a hypocrisy made more revolting by the fact that liberals who so vehemently opposed the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq are now willing to offer their enthusiastic backing for military attacks having bought the sickening lie that the likes of the United States, which kills scores of innocent people every week with predator drone strikes, has now suddenly developed a conscience for human suffering. Its also galling to witness the likes of Fox News and mainstream conservatives, who screamed until they were blue in the face about a mosque being built at ground zero in New York, now ignorantly applauding a United Nations-ordered war with no congressional approval which is solely designed to bring Al-Qaeda affiliated Islamic fundamentalists to power.


eddytoronto
said

Achieving new heights of hypocrisy, the U.S government is hyping the threat of Libyan-backed reprisal terror attacks inside the United States, while launching air strikes in support of so-called protesters who have commandeered fighter jets and tanks, and are in fact Islamic fundamentalist Al-Qaeda cells who want to impose sharia law in Libya.This is pretty rich considering the fact that it was British MI6 and the CIA who paid Osama bin Laden and Al-Qaeda $100,000 to $200,000 dollars to assassinate Gaddafi in 1996.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Top Stories

Former Liberian President Charles Taylor waits for the start of his sentencing judgement in the courtroom of the Special Court for Sierra Leone in Leidschendam, near The Hague, Netherlands, Wednesday May 30, 2012.  (AP / Toussaint Kluiters)

Charles Taylor gets 50 years for 'brutal' crimes

More   2 Comments 2    2 Video(s) 2

A police officer removes a package containing a human foot from the Conservative Party headquarters in Ottawa on Tuesday, May 29, 2012. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Police probe body parts in Ottawa, torso in Montreal

More    Comments    4 Video(s) 4

Supporters of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, hold placards and banners bearing images of him before the verdict was given in his extradition case at the Supreme Court in London, Wednesday, May 30, 2012. (AP / Matt Dunham)

Britain's top court backs extradition of WikiLeaks chief

More   4 Comments 4    2 Video(s) 2