Top Stories -   

1
Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi is shown in this video image broadcast on Tuesday Feb. 22, 2011. (AP / Libyan State Television) Residents are seen walking past a burned-out vehicle in Benghazi, Libya on Monday, Feb. 21, 2011. (AP / Alaguri) A resident, right, holds a pre-Gadhafi era national flag as he celebrates in Benghazi, Libya on Monday, Feb. 21, 2011. (AP / Alaguri) Residents stand on a tank inside a security forces compound in Benghazi, Libya on Monday, Feb. 21, 2011. (AP / Alaguri) A girl sitting out of a vehicle window celebrates and displays the victory sign in Benghazi, Libya on Monday, Feb. 21, 2011. (AP / Alaguri) In this video image broadcast on Libyan state television early Monday Feb. 21, 2011 Seif al-Islam, son of longtime Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi, speaks. (AP / Libyan State Television) Supporters of Libyan President Moammar Gadhafi shout slogans during a pro-government demonstration in Tripoli on Saturday Feb. 19, 2011. (AP / Abdel Magid Al Fergan) Libyan protesters Unrest in Libya

Gadhafi loyalists wage violent crackdown on protesters

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV National News: Martin Seemungal on the unrest
Moammar Gadhafi's iron grip on Libya appears to be weakening as many officials and soldiers are choosing to join the wave of protests.
Extended: Moammar Gadhafi emerges
Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi appears briefly on state television, saying he is in Tripoli.
CTV News Channel: Richard Madan on the impact
How is the unrest in Libya affecting North American markets? Libya is the third-largest oil producer in Africa, causing the price of crude oil to go up, and so can groceries. Airline tickets will also likely increase.
CTV News Channel: Michael Ervin, analyst
Michael Ervin an analyst for Petroleum Industry states Libya's oil is quite valued and there is some concern that the supply coming in from Libya is going to be tight, which will affect Europe.
CTV News Channel: Darrin Zammit-Lupi in Malta
A reporter with the Times of Malta describes local reaction after two Mirage warplanes from the Libyan air force fled a Tripoli air base and landed on the nearby island of Malta, and their pilots -- two colonels -- asked for political asylum.
CTV News Channel: Mona Eltahaway, analyst
A columnist from New York who specializes in Arab and Muslim issues analysis discusses the growing unrest in Libya and whether Moammar Gadhafi's power is crumbling.
CTV News Channel: Alessandro Bruno, editor
The deputy editor for the North Africa Journal discusses the unrest in Libya and the significance of foreign nationals defecting from the country and landing in Malta.
Canada AM: Mark Sedra on the differences
A member of the Centre for International Governance explains the differences between the clashes in Libya to those in Egypt. He explains how because the regime in Libya is tighter, more violence can be expected.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (38) Facebook   

Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi is shown in this video image broadcast on Tuesday Feb. 22, 2011. (AP / Libyan State Television) Residents are seen walking past a burned-out vehicle in Benghazi, Libya on Monday, Feb. 21, 2011. (AP / Alaguri) A resident, right, holds a pre-Gadhafi era national flag as he celebrates in Benghazi, Libya on Monday, Feb. 21, 2011. (AP / Alaguri) Residents stand on a tank inside a security forces compound in Benghazi, Libya on Monday, Feb. 21, 2011. (AP / Alaguri) A girl sitting out of a vehicle window celebrates and displays the victory sign in Benghazi, Libya on Monday, Feb. 21, 2011. (AP / Alaguri) In this video image broadcast on Libyan state television early Monday Feb. 21, 2011 Seif al-Islam, son of longtime Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi, speaks. (AP / Libyan State Television) Supporters of Libyan President Moammar Gadhafi shout slogans during a pro-government demonstration in Tripoli on Saturday Feb. 19, 2011. (AP / Abdel Magid Al Fergan) Libyan protesters Unrest in Libya

Photos

Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi is shown in this video image broadcast on Tuesday Feb. 22, 2011. (AP / Libyan State Television)

View Larger Image

Selected Comment

The true colours of these ideologue dictators are coming out now. If they are so popular that they always win elections with high margins, why are there such widespread uprisings everywhere? It seems that most of the countries where riots are taking place share a common ideology. And they should not occupy any seats on UN committees such as security of human rights. What a travesty!

Gomtor

Libyan protesters and security clash in capital

talking about
Gadhafi loyalists wage violent crackdown on protesters

Date: Mon. Feb. 21 2011 10:14 PM ET

Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi made a brief appearance on state television to quash rumours that he had fled to Venezuela, as his security forces attacked protesters in a violent bid to stop widespread revolt.

During his brief statement, which aired at 2 a.m. local time Tuesday, Gadhafi could be seen sitting in the passenger seat of a car, holding an umbrella out of an open door. A steady rain has fallen on Tripoli for the past two days.

Gadhafi tells an unseen interviewer that he had attempted to make his way to Green Square, in the capital, to speak with his supporters, but was stopped by the inclement weather.

"I am here to show that I am in Tripoli and not in Venezuela. Don't believe those misleading dog stations," Gadhafi said, referring to the media.

The bizarre appearance capped a day of increasing signs that his regime is in its final days.

A CNN correspondent inside Libya said the eastern part of the country appeared to be under the control of anti-Gadhafi forces, which included military personnel rebelling against the government.

Early Monday, jubilant protesters took control of the streets of Benghazi, Libya's second largest city, and anti-government demonstrations spread for the first time to the capital, with reports of bloody clashes in Tripoli's main square.

Libya's ambassadors at the United Nations issued a call for Gadhafi to step down and urged the international community to impose a no-fly zone over Libya to prevent mercenaries or weapons from reaching his security forces.

Deputy Ambassador Ibrahim Dabbashi said Monday that if Gadhafi does not relinquish power, "the Libyan people will get rid of him." There were also reports that Libyan diplomats in China and across Europe had resigned from their posts.

And in a possible hint of crumbling military support for the long-time strongman, two senior Libyan air force officers flew their fighter jets to the Mediterranean island of Malta to ask for political asylum.

The two Mirage high-performance fighters landed at Valetta, Malta, on Monday after their pilots, both colonels, told the control tower that they wanted asylum. They had taken off from a base near Tripoli and had flown low over Libyan airspace to avoid detection.

Late Monday, reports emerged from Libya that pro-Gadhafi militias were driving through the streets of Tripoli, warning residents over loudspeakers to remain in their homes, while reports on state television said military forces had "stormed the hideouts of saboteurs."

Residents reported seeing the pro-government militias firing indiscriminately as they drove through the streets, at times shooting directly at homes. Witnesses also said that both helicopters and military planes flew lower over the capital and surrounding areas.

While early reports suggested the warplanes had bombed parts of the capital, Gadhafi's son, Seif al-Islam, was quoted by state television as saying the military was conducting airstrikes on munitions warehouses and other targets in remote areas, away from residents.

Witnesses said Tripoli was virtually shut down Monday, with schools, government offices and most shops closed except a few bakeries serving local residents.

The latest reports out of Libya led world leaders to step up their calls for an end to the seven days of violence that has left at least 233 people dead, according to New York-based Human Rights Watch.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton called on Gadhafi to "stop this unacceptable bloodshed," while British Prime Minister David Cameron, who was visiting Egypt Monday, called the violent crackdown on protests "appalling."

"The regime is using the most vicious forms of repression against people who want to see that country -- which is one of the most closed and one of the most autocratic -- make progress," he said.

Earlier Monday, protesters clashed with police in the heart of Tripoli, Green Square.

Witnesses said snipers opened fire on crowds trying to seize the square. Before dawn, protesters reportedly took over the offices of two of the state-run satellite news channels and by daybreak, smoke was rising from two sites in Tripoli where a police station and a security forces base are located, Rehab, a lawyer watching from the roof of her home, told The Associated Press.

Gadhafi's regime has unleashed the bloodiest crackdown of any Arab country against the wave of protests sweeping the region, which toppled the leaders of Egypt and Tunisia.

Like his father's appearance a day later, the younger Gadhafi made an early morning appearance on state television Monday, vowing that his father and his security forces would fight "until the last bullet."

Seif al-Islam Gadhafi threatened civil war in a rambling, early morning speech, CTV Middle East bureau chief Martin Seemungal reported.

"He went on TV with a rather rambling -- and at times incoherent speech -- saying things like: ‘We admit that the army has made mistakes in firing on people, but we will never give up and if the demonstrators do not stop this is going to lead to civil war,'" Seemungal said.

Libya does not allow foreign journalists into the country and Seemungal said the reports from the capital were difficult to confirm. But if Gadhafi's control over Tripoli is slipping, he said it could spell the end of his rule.

"This is Gadhafi's stronghold and if in fact he cannot hold onto Tripoli, then it would seem that his days are numbered," Seemungal said.

In Benghazi

In the eastern port city of Benghazi, Libya's second largest city, protesters appeared to be in control Monday, overrunning the city's security headquarters and driving or marching through the streets in celebration chanting "Long live Libya."

Some protesters tore the Libyan flag down from above Benghazi's main courthouse and raised the flag of the country's old monarchy, which was toppled in 1969 by the military coup that brought Gadhafi to power, according to witnesses and video footage posted on the Internet.

Young men, both protesters and supporters of the regime, swarmed through captured security buildings, seizing weapons from abandoned police arsenals, said doctors at Benghazi's main hospital

Police had vanished from the city's streets, said witnesses, leaving youth volunteers to direct traffic and guard private homes and public facilities.

In some cases, army units reportedly turned against security forces and pro-Gadhafi militias.

Mohamed Abdul-Rahman, a 42-year-old Benghazi merchant, said he saw an army battalion chasing militiamen from a security compound.

Mark Sedra, of the Centre for International Governance, told CTV's Canada AM that there are signs of a split within the Libyan army, with units based in Benghazi and the eastern half of the country apparently backing the protesters while Tripoli-based elements remain loyal to Gadhafi.

"There has always been a split in Libya between east and west," he told CTV's Canada AM. "Some army units from Benghazi have turned on the Libyan regime and secured control of Benghazi … there could be some fighting or factional divisions within the army itself, which could probably lead to more violence."

The protesters' apparent triumph in Benghazi follows bloody clashes Sunday left at least 60 people dead.

Benghazi has seen a cycle of bloody clashes over the past week, as security forces kill protesters, followed by funerals that turn into new protests, sparking new bloody shootings.

After funerals Sunday, protesters fanned out, burning government buildings and police stations and besieging the large compound known as the Katiba, the city's main security headquarters.

'A security state'

Sedra said there may be even more deaths to come.

"The Libyan regime is a much more closed and authoritarian regime than what we saw in Tunisia and Egypt," he said. "It is really a security state. So we are probably going to see the government use some of those security mechanisms to try and put down these protesters. And that means we're probably going to see more violence going forward."

One fear was of regime supporters causing chaos. Amal Roqaqie, a lawyer at Benghazi Court, said that at dawn, wheat storage buildings were set on fire, though protesters were able to control the blaze.

She blamed Gadhafi supporters, saying "they want to starve the people and to intimidate them."

The younger Gadhafi's speech struck a defiant tone, but he also promised "historic" reforms in Libya if protests stop.

On Monday, state TV sought to give an air of normalcy, reporting that Moammar Gadhafi received telephone calls of support from the presidents of Nicaragua and Mali. It showed footage of a crowd of Libyans said to be from the town of Zeltein chanting their support for Gadhafi in a conference hall. Gadhafi, in flowing black and brown robes, waved to the crowd with both hands. It was not clear when the scene took place.

The spiralling turmoil in Libya, an OPEC country that is a significant oil supplier to Europe, was raising international alarm. Oil prices jumped $1.67 to nearly $88 a barrel Monday amid investor concern over the turmoil.

The Internet has been largely shut down, residents can no longer make international calls from land lines and journalists cannot work freely, but eyewitness reports trickling out of the country suggested that protesters were fighting back more forcefully against the Middle East's longest-serving leader.

Security forces have already used weapons such as heavy machine-guns and anti-aircraft artillery against demonstrators, according to residents. One witness said she saw bodies torn apart and that makeshift clinics had been set up in the streets to treat the wounded because hospitals were overwhelmed.

With files from The Associated Press

Comments are now closed for this story

Ben Him
said
0 0

The spike in oil prices is caused by speculation. There is no appreciable change in oil supply, even with the violence in Libya. On the good side, any long term increase might force people to abandon pick ups and suv's for more sensible transportation. Most people don't really need the personal tanks they use to intimidate fellow motorists. Maybe high gas prices will force more responsible environmental choices.


Linda In Vancouver
said
0 0

I think it's a bit of a stretch to say western nations really supported these dictators.To me, that implies they approved of them,and I don't think anything could be further from the truth.In reality,they accepted that those leaders were in place,that it was not for the west to go in there with all guns blazing to remove a dictator that the people there would not move against themselves. The west learned to live with the reality of the middle east,and found ways to just get along.I see that as far different than approving of,or embracing any of these despots.Not moving to attack someone is much different than actually approving of them.


@ oil consumer
said
0 0

Your very thinly veiled anti Israel remarks have no bearing on the situation in Libya. Where is the proof that Israel (their 'ally' in the Middle East) would not support democratic Arab nations? Where is the proof that democratic Arab nations would raise the price of gas at the pumps, a factor controlled only by our domestic oil companies and the government? Think a little before you post. Whats a 'stock market lobbyist'? Which executives are elected?

allan
said
0 0

Next---Venezuala or Cuba?


Mark
said
0 0

Politicians from all countries should take note of these brave people and their average age. They are young people who want to be free to make a living and do what ever they want to do. The power is with the youth - I hope that this resonates with the young people of Canada so when we have our elections here that they make the old "farts" that dictate how we must behave start to reconsider that they don't always know best.I am 57 years old and have been active in politics since my teens including holding public office.


TheOtherLowellinBC
said
0 0

I guess the question is, do we really care if these countries are ruled by dictators or more representational government. There is a wave flowing across the middle east now to rid countries of dictatorial regimes. All it took was a spark (i.e. tunisia). People are suddenly realizing that living under someone's thumb is not the ideal situation. Even cracks are showing in Iran. Despite some of the comments on this blog to the contrary, it will ultimately be a good thing to rid the world of dictators. What we are going to need here in the western world are higher standards of democracy. Prime Minister Harper are you listening?


Goldens
said
0 0

Democracy is limited wrote:Democracy is one of the lower forms of government we can have where mob rules but that isn't necessarily a good thing all the time#####################################Winston Churchill said that democracy was a terrible form of government but it is far ahead of whatever form of government that is in second place.


Oil consumer
said
0 0

Do our economists and stock markets lobbyists really want democracy in these countries?Democracy in these countries would mean elected executives and politicians. Elected politicians may not want to comply with interest of western countries and their 'ally' in the Middle East. Would we keep supporting democracy in these countries when the gas price at pump will double or tripled? Would we still support their democracy when western military bases will be asked to leave these countries? Would we support democracy when arm producing companies have to layoff workers? - Gadhafi was on the terrorist list in 80s. Western countries including France accepted him as an ally and arm trade destination as soon as he accepted letting ELF and other oil companies exploit Libyan oil.


ThundeR
said
0 0

The situation in Libya has been sparked by the protests in Egypt. The Egyptians wanted change, and they got it. The Libyans will want to see they're dictator government turn into democracy.The military backing the Libyans will cause more feud and bloodshed, and perhaps military secrets will be betrayed.The sudden spike in oil is o be expected - and of course the gas stations and such here are going to take advantage of that, as this is profitable for them. All in all, its going to be a hard battle between Gadhafi and the protestors.


Doug ^^^ BC
said
0 0

I was tending to think "AndyL" had some very valid concerns.Those being the fear that the incoming leaders could well be as bad,or even worse than those on the way out.I think a whole lot of people on this planet have those concerns, and will continue to have them until new leaders are in place,and we know what they stand FOR. Sorry though."Andy".your dribble about "greedy gas station owners" detracts from your post. Clearly you know nothing about the price of gas,who sets the price,how much of that price is TAXES,and where the profits go. Still,your questions about who or what next for these nations revolting against the current regimes,remain valid causes for concern. But from here,all we can do is wish them well.To take a side would be suicide.We'd either end up supporting the current dictator,or find ourselves expected to go to war to support the protestors.Neither option looks very attractive to me.


Redneck Albertan
said
0 0

This is an instance where foreign military intervention is the right thing to do. I'm not talking about an invasion, but creating a "No Fly Zone" for Libyan military aircraft, enforced by NATO and the Egyptian Air Force would be a good idea. Bombing civilian protesters is utter barbarism and must be stopped.


jordan
said
0 0

@AndyL: no, you're right. only western countries are capable of being "good." (i'm being sarcastic btw)....the thing is, all countries in this world are "bad." the only difference between them and "us" is that they treat their own people poorly and we treat OTHER people poorly. we do our bad things abroad. we exploit poor people from foreign countries, we wage war on their lands, we occupy their lands, we take their resources, turn those resources into goods (which we have them manufacture for us)...then we sell it back to them for unaffordable prices in order to keep them poor. they're living in "caveman" conditions because we keep them that way. but they are not lacking morals any more than we are.

a common thread....
said
0 0

The common thread of humanity is weaving its way across the globe enabled by the threads of broad band. Humanity is turning a new leaf. We have far more to fight for in common than the ruling elite want us to know. Solidarity.....peace, freedom of expression, free from economic servitude and fear. Basic human values and desires. Egypt, Tunisia, Libya, Wisconsin, here?!


Democracy is limited
said
0 0

Democracy is one of the lower forms of government we can have where mob rules but that isn't necessarily a good thing all the time. The mob isn't always right. Benevolent dictators or Kings can be good but rarely are. The highest form of government is the Kingdom of God on earth one day and the worst is probably something like what we have in Iran now with bloodshed and oppression. We have seen many theocracies in the past from Rome and elsewhere which were supposed to be good but were evil. In between we have all sorts of possibilities.


Goldens
said
0 0

Moamamr Gadhafi Duck it is beginning to look like you are going to get your feathers plucked.


Michael (Ottawa)
said
0 0

One day all these murderous rulers will be done away with and the world will live in peace and the evil will be locked away for good. I support the overthrow of this wicked man.


Peace
said
0 0

What is it on here about all the anti-Israeli rant? This has nothing to do with Israel! This has to do with power hungry dictators who have let their own people suffer under their regimes while they ate like fattened pigs. Israel is the only democracy in the middle east, it defends herself due to the fact that almost every country that surrounds her wants to wipe her off the face of the planet. One country (Iran) has openly stated that they will use nuclear weapons to do so. Pardon me, but wouldn't that cause a country to be a little jittery and defend herself at all costs? If I am correct, it has been Hezbollah and other organizations lobbing rockets into Israeli civilian territory killing women and children and after they do that, you see them celebrating after seeing who they killed. For such a beautiful part of the world with such rich culture and history has way too much hate and this is why the rest of the world looks at the middle east in disgust.


iluvsask
said
0 0

Did I hear/read incorrectly that most of these areas of unrest are currently Western allies? How does this play into all of this? Just asking.


4-see
said
0 0

Once Democracy spreads throughout the Middle-East it will be very clear that the true aggressor in the region in Israel. They will no longer be able to persuade international opinion that they are dealing with cavemen who want them destroyed. And once Societies all over the Middle East open up to the rest of the world, support for the Israeli state will diminish rapidly and it will only be a matter of time before the new Diaspora begins.


Richard L. Provencher
said
0 0

Freeze all Libyan assets, including Omar's loot. Isn't it sad that these potentates all have money stashed away in Swiss banks or elsewhere? That alone tells you what their heart is for their country. The Ruling parties are now and finally coming to an end. For the first time there will be many middle eastern countries sharing their wealth with their citizens.


AndyL
said
0 0

The next guy to be in charge, will be just as bad as the last guy in charge. This has been like that since the dawn of time in the Middle East. The only thing that will come out of this, is a huge spike at the gas pump. Today barrel of oil went up by $5 at noon and you can be sure the greedy gas station operators will make us pay through the nose for this increase. But life will not get better in the morally corrupt middle east.


John
said
0 0

@firstaid Stop with the revisionist history please.

Palestinians in the Gaza strip and West Bank have now spent decades indiscriminately launching rockets at Israel, not to mention suicide attacks.

All nations surrounding Israel declared war on a Jewish country before it was created.



allan
said
0 0

Kadaffi can always go and live in one of his allied countries, like Scotland.


CTVviewer
said
0 0

UN is dysfunctional. It serves little, if any, useful purpose for Canada.UN=192 countries54 are African (Egypt, Libya, Tunisia, etc.)57 are members of the Islamic Congress, where the UN Human Rights Declaration has been superceded by the Cairo HR Declaration.50 (approx) are democratic-type countries.As it is structured, the UN is not (and cannot be) in-tune with Canadian values.


Gohar Rehman
said
0 0

All these changes are good for socalled muslim countries if the people can speak their mind ;right from east Asia to Sauidi arabia ; the regimes are either dictators or pupets of the West; which is not good for the people;change is good for all of them ;it is also in the best interest of USA and others not to side with puppets;but side with the public


firstaid
said
0 0

Chuck, you said:"Israel is the only true democracy in the middle east" well, what is so democratic about killing indiscriminately and enslaving Palestinians for so many years stealing their land? Israel just like USA supported regimes all over the world. Such BS will only work for High School drop outs.



Chris
said
0 0

The only problem with revolutions is that the people who take over are often just as bad as those they have ousted. That being said, hurry up and get it over with before i have to mortgage my house for a tank of gas.


GHW
said
0 0

It is refreshing to see the people of these countries rise up and take responsibility and control over their future. Once democracy is established across the Middle East Israel will finally be able to make peace with its neighbors and all will prosper. With all the oil they have the Middle East could be an economic power house. It is likely however that the super powers of our current world will have to step in to stabilize and help usher in this brave new world for them. I believe that eventually, not sure how long, the world will unite under a world governing system with ten regional democratic governments with ten sub-constitutions. Babylon, or Bagdad, will be the power house capital of the Middle East region. One thing is for sure, the world changes all the time. Staying ahead of the curve is the place to be.


Chuck
said
0 0

The middle east is slowly falling into the flames of change and many people will lose their lives over this. The UN which is one of the most corrupt institutions on the face of the earth have never practiced what they have preached and have allowed these brutal dictators nations sit on many of the councils within the UN. People can blame the US all they want, but we must remember many of these nations relations with the US are lukewarm at best. You can blame Israel all you want as well, but Israel is the only true democracy in the middle easy and surrounded on allsides by nations who want to see them wiped off the map. Libya is just one example of a nation that has mistreated their people while the very high and elite such as Ghadafi have lived off of their blood sweat and tears. Change is coming in that region in the world and we here in Canada had better be prepared to either go there and assist in implementing democracy the proper way or open our doors to more refugee's, because that region of the world is going to produce millions of them.


Banana Republic
said
0 0

Its always fun to see people like "Gadhafi must go" stray off topic and find a way to blame Israel for problems completely unrelated. Israel has nothing to do with Libya, Tunisia, Bahrain or Yemen, and yet, you find a curious way of bringing Israel into the mix.The end of the regimes spells nothing but good news for Israel. These leaders which for decades ignored their domestic problems by placing all evils on Israel, will no longer have that luxury. The citizens have woken up and realize that their unemployment and poverty, as well as the corruption of their regimes have nothing to do with Israel.Maybe you'll come to that realizations sometime too. Given Israel is the only country whose government is not only democratic but also UPHOLDS democratic values, maybe it can be an example for the other governments-to-be. That is of course, unless we keep blaming Israel for everything allthewhile ignoring the domestic problems plaguing these societies.


Gadhafi must go
said
0 0

These criminal thugs in control of these nations are put there and kept there by the United States. They are now being ousted by the United States because we are going to see a very drastic change in foreign policy in the US towards the Muslim world. Namely Israel is now in a position where it either makes peace or face catastrophe because the USA (& world) can no longer afford to financially, politically and diplomatically support Israel at the cost of American lives and homeland security. I am hoping that Israel chooses peace for the first time in its dreadful 60 year history. Libya is an African nation not Arab nation. Will you people who post here look at a map, read a book and stop posting your asinine ignorance. Like Egypt, Libya is African with both Arab and African population ethnicities. I hope the people of Libya get rid of the sociopath that has been haunting their lives for decades.


Me in freezing TO
said
0 0

@Richard in New Brunswick.I agree with those standards. Just understand those standards mean USA would not qualify to participate because they are among the worst human rights offenders, outdone in war crimes only their buddy Israel. Canada would also not qualify to participate because of its handing over of the child, Khadri to be imprisoned, tortured and railroaded by USA. Just saying.


Donaldbain
said
0 0

I am predicting a Mussolini/-like end for Gadhafi, in a desperate escape bid he will be strung up (along with his family) by fellow Libyans who will dance and pose for photos around his dead body. There is no excuse for poverty in such an oil rich nation, unless someone is taking all the money for themselves.


Gerald
said
0 0

I don't know why people sometimes refer to Gaghafi as a "charismatic leader" . You are probably beaten with a stick if you didn't kiss his feet and say that he was from the day you were born. I think his days are numbered . These people deserve a much better life.


David V.
said
0 0

It would seem surprising to some that Gaddafi is losing his grip, but less so if you really know the reasons. Libya is comparable to Nazi Germany or the Soviet Union in terms of the totality and pervasiveness of its police state, oppressive even by Arab standards. Like Romania in 1989, this will end inevitably in bloodshed.


Richard in New Brunswick
said
0 0

I agree with Gomtor... any nation that doesn't adopt and enforce such philosophies and policies as the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights should not be allowed to participate in (other than as a non-voting observor) or benefit from (other than in emergency aid in times of natural disasters) an association with the United Nations. These nations should be shunned as outcasts and suffer the economic consequences. Any UN member nation that chooses to trade with any of the "outcast" nations should also lose voting privileges and most certainly should never be allowed to sit on the Security Council. There needs to be real and severe PERSONAL consequences for any government leaders who abuse their citizens in any way.


Tomas
said
0 0

Let´s see if the Arab world can do something other than blame the rest of the world for their problems this time. Or will Europe and the West be called upon once again to save them???


Gomtor
said
0 0

The true colours of these ideologue dictators are coming out now. If they are so popular that they always win elections with high margins, why are there such widespread uprisings everywhere? It seems that most of the countries where riots are taking place share a common ideology. And they should not occupy any seats on UN committees such as security of human rights. What a travesty!


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Top Stories

Former Liberian President Charles Taylor waits for the start of his sentencing judgement in the courtroom of the Special Court for Sierra Leone in Leidschendam, near The Hague, Netherlands, Wednesday May 30, 2012.  (AP / Toussaint Kluiters)

Charles Taylor gets 50 years for 'brutal' crimes

More   2 Comments 2    1 Video(s) 1

A police officer removes a package containing a human foot from the Conservative Party headquarters in Ottawa on Tuesday, May 29, 2012. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Police probe body parts in Ottawa, torso in Montreal

More    Comments    4 Video(s) 4

Supporters of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, hold placards and banners bearing images of him before the verdict was given in his extradition case at the Supreme Court in London, Wednesday, May 30, 2012. (AP / Matt Dunham)

Britain's top court backs extradition of WikiLeaks chief

More   4 Comments 4    2 Video(s) 2