Top Stories -   

1

Junk food diet may lower kids' IQ, study suggests

Tim Hortons' doughnuts are lined up in a box in New York, Wednesday, July 22, 2009. The Canadian doughnut chain moved into 12 former Dunkin Donut locations earlier in the month, bringing new blood to the doughnut war in America's most competitive market. (AP Photo/Seth Wenig) Chicken burger Fast food
Tim Hortons' doughnuts are lined up in a box in New York, Wednesday, July 22, 2009. The Canadian doughnut chain moved into 12 former Dunkin Donut locations earlier in the month, bringing new blood to the doughnut war in America's most competitive market. (AP Photo/Seth Wenig)

View Larger Image

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (29) Facebook   

Date: Tuesday Feb. 8, 2011 1:55 PM ET

Kids who eat a diet high in fats, sugars, and processed foods in early childhood appear to grow up to have a lower IQ, while those who eat a diet rich in vitamins and nutrients grow to have higher intelligence, new research suggests.

The findings were made by researchers who looked at data from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. The study is tracking the long-term health and well-being of around 14,000 children born in 1991 and 1992.

Parents complete questionnaires detailing the types and frequency of the food and drink their children consume at the ages of three, four, seven and 8.5 years old. IQ is measured when they were 8.5 years old.

This study focused on 3,966 children for whom complete data were available. The researchers broke up the kids into three dietary patterns:

  • "processed" high in fats and sugar intake
  • "traditional" high in meat and vegetable intake
  • "health conscious" high in salad, fruit and vegetables, rice and pasta.

After the researchers adjusted their findings for several factors, including breastfeeding duration and the amount of oily fish their mothers consumed while pregnant, they found that a highly processed food diet at the age of three was linked with a lower IQ at the age of 8.5. Every 1 point increase in dietary pattern score was associated with a 1.67 fall in IQ.

On the other hand, a healthy diet was associated with a higher IQ at the age of 8.5, with every 1 point increase in dietary pattern linked to a 1.2 increase in IQ.

They also found that it didn't matter if the children's diets improved or worsened at older ages. Dietary patterns between the ages of 4 and 7 had no impact on IQ.

The authors note that the differences in IQ were modest. Nevertheless, they say the findings are in line with previous research from the same study group which found a link between early childhood diet and later behaviour and school performance.

"This suggests that any cognitive/behavioural effects relating to eating habits in early childhood may well persist into later childhood, despite any subsequent changes (including improvements) to dietary intake," say the researchers, whose study appears in the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.

The authors note that the brain grows at its fastest rate during the first three years of life. Other research has found that head growth at this time is linked to intellectual ability.

"It is possible that good nutrition during this period may encourage optimal brain growth," they suggest.

The researchers say more research is needed to understand the extent of the effect early diet has on intelligence.

Comments are now closed for this story

Will
said
0 0

News flash for those who treat this study as gospel: Correlation does NOT equal Causation.


Cletus
said
0 0

Huh?


Charles Regina
said
0 0

I love how there is a lot of focus on food and practically none on water. One of the main reasons for obesity is due to improper hydration and/or a low body PH level. Not only is lye, a very toxic chemical used to raise the p.h level, tap water also contains lead, chlorine and other tasty chemicals. Reverse Osmosis is great, but the purifying process kills the "life" of the water and is not as alkalinic as Kangen water or most "Ionized" water. Kagen water has 12 features that no other water on earth has. Google the rest of the facts on Kangen water, but if you have a chance to try it i highly recommend it.I can't say that being raised with tap water results in a lower IQ but i do know it has an impact on how your body digests the food.


Doug ^^^ BC
said
0 0

Another study by some nebulous group of social engineers.Whe exactly are the people who sit in on a sudy by the "Avon Longitudinal Study Of Parents And Children",and what is their agenda?? Am I being to cynical here,or is this a group that hopes to legialsate or tax something so they can get government social programs imposed on every family in the nation? DOn't get me wrong.Parents and children are the backbone of a civil society.And the goal of having them healthy is both laudible and very important.But this study reveals very little that our ancestors didn't consider "common sense" as far back as a century or more.They kids grew up and build everything we take for granted. in this century.They didn't have special interst groups or obscure organizations tellling them what they needed to do.They just fif it. While it's true that they didn't have deep fried Mc Foods and sugary treats to deal with,they also had far less fresh fruits and vegetables.Even in the middle of the last century,canned fruits and vegies we the most common,most of the time,in most parts of Canada.The infrastructure to get fresh food to all of Canada was simply not there. Now I know science is always coming forward with new knowledge.But honestly,is this about real science,a political agenda,a level of social engineering,or is it about trying to IMPOSE common sense on people who just won't be told how to live? By anyone? Aside from the scientific explanation of HOW a poor diet impacts people,where is the real news in this? My great grandparents knew most of this more than a century ago.And they would have shared this knowledge with anyone.For free.


KAY
said
0 0

The only ones with low IQ's are those who gave the "go ahead" for yet another useless report that costs some tax payers somewhere in this world a lot of money!


Andrew
said
0 0

@mama I think you and a few other people are missing the point here or perhaps you're not aware. It absolutely stands to reason that diet will have an impact on a developing brain or even body. And while yes I agree that a popsicle and treat here and there is not a big deal, you need to understand that there are people out there that will willing feed their 3 or 4 year old child an entire bag of Doritos as a meal (I am a paramedic in the GTA and you would wretch at the things I've seen families feed their children). Many families feed their children processed food for each and every meal! Say what you will, but processed food is simply toxic as far as I'm concerned. All one has to do is look at current obesity rates and general health levels in this country. It's sad that so many people have lost so much respect for healthy eating and actually believe that a package of "chicken nuggets" you pop in the oven is good for you. People need to educate themselves about what is actually going into our food.


Craig
said
0 0

No study was needed to know this. The quality of diet is one of the cornerstones of infant and toddler development.What studies like this say is a 3 year old shouldn't be eating Doritos and McDonalds, which far too many children do.There are a lot of socioeconomic things that could go with this type of study as well. Lower income children tend to have worse diets than middle class and upper class children.Obviously feeding a child a popsicle or a cookie on occasion isn't going to harm them. It's even better if you made the cookies yourself. The only thing needed to combat sugar is exercise.Eating fat never killed anyone, eating sugar and not moving has.People need to stop getting so bent out of shape because science says feeding your child crap isn't good for them. To me the people that get offended are the guilty parties.


mama
said
0 0

@CAra, in case you were not aware, most 3 year olds go to preschool and have Christmas parties and Valentines parties there too. I know this because I have a three year old in preschool who is having a Valentines party on thursday and I know if I excluded him from that because they are going to be making heart cookies, he would feel pretty sad. A cookie is not going to lower his IQ! I'll say it again, moderation is the key!


jen
said
0 0

No, you know what's lowering kids IQ's...it's the other 40 kids in their classrooms, some of whom sit in the closet because there's no more room for a desk..it's the two week winter festivals where they skate and play and stay away from the classroom as much as possible..it's the photo copied hand outs because the teachers feel it would be impossible for all of the students to be able to copy down what's written on the board..it's the school necessity of a calculator when learning how to multiply (by buttons)...it's the "as long as you can sound it out spelling we won't correct your spelling error" rather than the "look it up in the dictionary spelling".. in other words it's the lack of education, it's the warehousing of our children so that their future holds nothing but low paying service jobs..how dare one of them might want to actually reach higher and extend their education...in that case we have a beautiful large bill which they will be paying for the rest of their lives waiting on tables....thankyou Dalton McGuinty.


Cara B, NS
said
0 0

@Mama:All well and good but they are talking about 3 year olds, not school age children. How "left out" is a 3 year old because he has carrots instead of cookies in his lunch?


Prof. Pye Chartt
said
0 0

@ Lynn: Yes, I'm aware...and my point stands. Thanks.


mama
said
0 0

Im sick of these studies! All they do is turn parents into total freaks about child rearing. I hear parents say things like "my child is 4 and has never had chocolate, or my child only drinks soy milk, my child loves carots more than chips, blah, blah, blah" I dont see anything wrong with giving my kids a popsicle on a hot day or cookies and milk on a cold winter evening or allowing them to partake in pizza and ice cream at a birthday party, trick or treating. I think by not allowing them to have these things once in awhile your singleing them out. My daughter has a boy in her class whos not allowed treats so whenever their having a halloween or valentines or christmas party, he's totally left out, sittin in the corner with his bean sprouts and granola, is his IQ higher than the other kids, probably not, but his spirits are much lower. Moderation is the key to life!


Wes
said
0 0

That's a lot of baloney!!!


Lynn
said
0 0

@Kathleen - I know what you're saying and agree with the point you're making -- creative play and cognitive stimulation is a basic necessity to brain optimization for babies, toddlers, preschoolers. However, considering the years during which the children in this study were born were the early 90's, ipods and texting were not in the picture. TV watching could have had an impact; likely not even video games though. My three kids were born within 3.5 years of one another, and we had tons of playdates, so they had lots of creative play and social interaction; I used adult language (not babytalk) in all our interactions throughout the day; we ate traditional food; all three kids happen to have high IQs. @ Prof. Pye Chartt -- IQ tests cannot be performed at age 3; thus no baseline for this study.


Western Guy
said
0 0

Anybody else think they might have been missing some other connections here? Wouldn't it be reasonable to assume that lower intelligence parents would be more likely to feed their children less healthy food. Wouldn't it also be likely that lower intelligence parents would naturally have lower intelligence kids? Also aren't lower intelligence people typically at the bottom of society where people are much more likely to eat junk food?Basically I am alternatively saying that stupid people will have stupid kids and because the parents are stupid they will feed the kids bad food. End of story.



said
0 0

While diet is important the greater issue is the "garbage in garbage out" syndrome. Kids who are fed a steady diet of video games or ipods stuck in their ears 24/7 blaring questionable lyrics into their brain and other empty pursuits rather than being outside playing and getting the healthy exercise and interaction with others is at the crux of the matter. Parents are allowing the kids to make the choices for them usurping their responsibility, it is the same with disciplinary issues. The kids are in control not the parents.


Dixie from Alberta
said
0 0

Enough with spending $$ on studies. Junk food is not good for you....plain & simple...& I didn't spend a dime figuring that out. So spend the study money on educating parents on how to feed their children properly. Or spend some money on lowing the price of all those good foods out there. Considering you can feed a family of our for under $10 if you pick the greasy $1 items from a fast food menu but they would have to spend a lot more than $10 if they tried to eat healthy. A 2 litre of pop can run you a buck whereas a 2 litre of milk is over $3.


Anonymous Al
said
0 0

If only this finding is true for me. My parents forced me to eat super healthy until I was 18 or 19 and moved out for university. I, however, am dumb as dirt.


Jackie Barrett
said
0 0

Since most junk food is sweetened with artificial sugars, particularly High Fructose Corn Syrop and Aspartame (found in Diet Coke), instead of naturally produced sugars like "cane sugar", there might be some truth in the fact that junk food causes low intelligence.Furthermore, because High Fructose Corn Syrop is known for containing trace amounts of Mercury, junk foods sweetened with this artificial sugar maybe causing brain damage, and the result is lower IQs.Since High Fructose Corn Syrop is toxic and bad on our organs, the Canadian Government should outlaw this sugar and force junk food manufacturers to use natural based sugars like "cane sugars" or other starches easily processed in the body.


Kathleen
said
0 0

It stands to reason that if a body part gets fed important ingredients while its growing that it helps it to grow more effectively. There was a very key component of this study however - missing. That being, what was fed to the brain of those same children during that time with respect to knowledge? How many were sedentary and doing nothing but listening to ipods or texting compared with those that were feeding their brains with knowledge and skills. There are many studies that clearly show an idle brain deteriorates. How much of what was fed to their brains with respect to knowledge impacted this study without their identifying its importance?


TerryR Lethbridge
said
0 0

The real problem is the diet of DDE. Dumbed Down Education set down by the government. It is not the teachers, they teach what they are told.


DANIEL H
said
0 0

Hmmmmm.... Reading the previous comments I think some of these people had too much junk food as a child. LOL


Prof. Pye Chartt
said
0 0

It appears that the Intelligence Quotient was only measured ONCE (at 8.5 years), at the conclusion of the study period. Therefore, one could somewhat facetiously argue that the nature of food consumed had nothing to do with the results, that children who had a poor diet and registered a lower I.Q. were/are the product of "dumb" parents, and, thus, are merely fulfilling their genetic-intellectual destiny. (Similarly, socioeconomic characteristics could also be at play, rendering the "diet" angle questionable.) Not a definitive study, by any stretch.


RGBrook
said
0 0

So, feeding junk food to a child under the age of 4 will affect their future health and IQ? What kind of a responsible parent would feed junk food to a child that age anyway? I know that answer to that - NO "responsible" parent would.


Scott Holt
said
0 0

Give me a break, sick and tired of all these stupid studies of this may be linked to that.


jeff
said
0 0

reading articles like this also lowers you IQ


JB in Canada
said
0 0

Yeah right - Have they ever looked at the diet of a struggling college/university students!


Sam C
said
0 0

"It is possible that good nutrition during this period may encourage optimal brain growth," they suggest. Who knew? Now if only we could convince parents -- and KIDS -- of this.


Doya
said
0 0

The article infers that when a young child eats processed foods, his IQ drops. I believe that parents with lower education (not necessarily IQ) are more prone to purchase and eat processed foods.Similarly, mothers who chose not to breastfeed and eat oily fish (I assume Omega-3 is the fat the article means) are more likely to feed their children processed foods.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Subscribe!

MedNews Express newsletter

CTV MedNews Express

Sign up for our weekly medical newsletter, delivered for free to your inbox.

CTV.ca Blogs

Dr. Marla Shapiro

Health Blog

Check out what our guest medical experts and CTV health reporters are writing about.

Twitter

Avis Favaro Twitter

Follow us on Twitter

Follow CTV medical specialist Avis Favaro on Twitter.

Facebook

Like us on Facebook!

Like us on Facebook

Stay connected to the latest health news while you're on Facebook with CTV MedNews

Today's Top Stories

Former Liberian President Charles Taylor waits for the start of his sentencing judgement in the courtroom of the Special Court for Sierra Leone in Leidschendam, near The Hague, Netherlands, Wednesday May 30, 2012.  (AP / Toussaint Kluiters)

Charles Taylor gets 50 years for 'brutal' crimes

More   2 Comments 2    1 Video(s) 1

A police officer removes a package containing a human foot from the Conservative Party headquarters in Ottawa on Tuesday, May 29, 2012. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Police probe body parts in Ottawa, torso in Montreal

More    Comments    3 Video(s) 3

Supporters of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, hold placards and banners bearing images of him before the verdict was given in his extradition case at the Supreme Court in London, Wednesday, May 30, 2012. (AP / Matt Dunham)

Britain's top court backs extradition of WikiLeaks chief

More   4 Comments 4    2 Video(s) 2