Top Stories -   

1
The founder of secret-spilling website WikiLeaks Julian Assange, left, walks out to face the media flanked by his lawyer Jennifer Robinson after making an appearance at Belmarsh Magistrates' Court in London, Tuesday, Jan. 11, 2011. (AP / Lefteris Pitarakis) The founder of secret-spilling website WikiLeaks Julian Assange is flanked by police officers as he leaves court after making an appearance at Belmarsh Magistrates' Court in London, Tuesday, Jan. 11, 2011. (AP / Lefteris Pitarakis) WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange arrives at Belmarsh Magistrate's court in London for his extradition hearing, Tuesday, Jan. 11, 2011. (AP / Matt Dunham) The founder of WikiLeaks Julian Assange, center, speaks to the media flanked by his lawyers Mark Stephens, left, and Jennifer Robinson after making a appearance at Belmarsh Magistrates' Court in London, Tuesday, Jan. 11, 2011. (AP / Matt Dunham) Julian Assange

Assange says WikiLeaks will 'step up' publishing

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV News Channel: Sarah Ellison, Vanity Fair
A journalist talks about how the relationship between the Guardian and Wikileaks started, and how Julian Assange was happy to partner with five separate publications despite having differences.
Canada AM: Tom Kennedy in London
CTV's London bureau chief discusses the Julian Assange hearing. He says Assange will appear in court Tuesday so details may be hammered out prior to his extradition hearing on Feb. 7.
Extended: WikiLeaks founder arrives for hearing
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange arrives at a British court for his Swedish extradition hearing.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (19) Facebook   

The founder of secret-spilling website WikiLeaks Julian Assange, left, walks out to face the media flanked by his lawyer Jennifer Robinson after making an appearance at Belmarsh Magistrates' Court in London, Tuesday, Jan. 11, 2011. (AP / Lefteris Pitarakis) The founder of secret-spilling website WikiLeaks Julian Assange is flanked by police officers as he leaves court after making an appearance at Belmarsh Magistrates' Court in London, Tuesday, Jan. 11, 2011. (AP / Lefteris Pitarakis) WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange arrives at Belmarsh Magistrate's court in London for his extradition hearing, Tuesday, Jan. 11, 2011. (AP / Matt Dunham) The founder of WikiLeaks Julian Assange, center, speaks to the media flanked by his lawyers Mark Stephens, left, and Jennifer Robinson after making a appearance at Belmarsh Magistrates' Court in London, Tuesday, Jan. 11, 2011. (AP / Matt Dunham) Julian Assange

Photos

The founder of secret-spilling website WikiLeaks Julian Assange, left, walks out to face the media flanked by his lawyer Jennifer Robinson after making an appearance at Belmarsh Magistrates' Court in London, Tuesday, Jan. 11, 2011. (AP / Lefteris Pitarakis)

View Larger Image

Date: Tue. Jan. 11 2011 8:05 AM ET

Following a brief court appearance for a procedural hearing in his fight against extradition to Sweden, where he is wanted in a sex-crimes inquiry, Julian Assange vowed that his website WikiLeaks will continue "unabated."

The 39-year-old founder of the whistle-blowing website arrived for the ten-minute hearing in London with his lawyer Mark Stephens on Tuesday.

Dressed in a dark suit and navy tie, the silver-haired Australian posed for photographs on his way into the high-security Woolwich Crown Court, but he did not speak to reporters.

Once inside, Assange only spoke to confirm his identity and address.

On his way out, however, Assange announced he was happy with the day's events, and promised that the recent slowdown in the tide of leaks from his website will soon change.

"We are stepping up our publishing for matters related to Cablegate and other materials," Assange said. "Those will shortly be occurring through our newspaper partners around the world -- big and small newspapers and some human rights organizations."

He did not answer questions.

Reporting from the British capital, CTV's London Bureau Chief Tom Kennedy said the brief appearance is nevertheless attracting enormous interest, including scrutiny of the decision to move the hearing from a downtown London courtroom to the facility Thamesmead court built adjacent to the maximum security Belmarsh prison.

"It's normally a court that is used for terrorism cases. In fact, Julian Assange's lawyer is arguing that the authorities are trying to present him as a very dangerous man," Kennedy explained. Officials counter that the crush of media and public interest in Assange prompted the move.

Assange, who has been confined to the country estate of ex-soldier, frontline journalist and media club founder Vaughan Smith since he was released following his arrest in December, is due back in court for the full two-day extradition hearing that begins on Feb. 7.

The judge on Tuesday agreed that Assange could stay at Smith's Frontline Club in London during the full hearing.

WikiLeaks grabbed the world's attention late last year, when it began publishing classified U.S. diplomatic cables, intelligence files and even videos that have served to embarrass the White House and its allies.

Speculation that American prosecutors are trying to build a criminal case against the site and its operators has been spurred by subpoenas from the U.S. attorney's office in Alexandria, Va. demanding Twitter hand over account details for Assange and Pfc. Bradley Manning, the Army intelligence analyst suspected of supplying WikiLeaks with its reams of secret documents.

"This is the first real concrete sign that there is a criminal investigation going on in the States," Kennedy said. "It is suspected, certainly among people connected to WikiLeaks, that there is a secret grand jury investigation in the U.S. looking into possible espionage charges that could be laid against Assange."

In a statement released early Tuesday, WikiLeaks suggested the site and its founder were being unfairly singled out.

WikiLeaks said its staff has been subject to "unprecedented violent rhetoric by U.S. prominent media personalities," naming former vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin as one of those who called for Assange to be hunted down like a terrorist.

Comments are now closed for this story

Charles Regina
said
0 0

"Those who sacrifice liberty for security deserve neither."If everyobody hid the truth about WW2 extermination camps, they might still be around today. We, the people, do have a right to know what our leaders are up to. Go Assange! As far as compromising American millitary plans, i'm sure they can come up with something a little more, complicated...with all the billions invested and whatnot. Infact, if they believe their opponent may know of their plans, they might have a better chance using a trump card. I am surprised we are still hearing about him.


Val
said
0 0

I fail to understand the position of those opposed to the release of information that would (hopefully) cause politicians and the like to consider their actions and the potential consequences thereof more carefully.

Is it really that difficult to see the inherent danger in people (in particular politicians and lawmakers) believing their actions will never be known or checked?

It is strange that so many blame wiki leaks for, what in truth are, the actions of people who would have acted differently had they known they would ever be found out.


Norm
said
0 0

While North American media is embedded with the government the only way the real truth can get out is through a site like WikiLeaks. Yes spilling secrets might put our troops in danger but just by being over there has put them in danger. We need more WikiLeak type sites exposing what other countries are doing. Let get it all out in the open so we can see what is really going on and put an end to it. It is the only way we will have real peace in this world.


Munro - Brampton
said
0 0

In the US individuals are at great risk from the government. The government wants to read your E-mail's, look at your bank accounts, listen to your phone calls, photogragh you, question you with out any concern for your privacy. When people turn the scrutiny on the government, it gets very uncomfortable. What does it want to hide ? Is'nt that what their excuse is for spying on the citizens.


bk1721
said
0 0

The truth itself isn't alarming in itself, but WikiLeaks simply doesn't afford the average person anything relevant. Perhaps if some information was released on the misappropriation of government funds, for instance, it would be far more important to the average citizen. Instead what WikiLeaks offers is petty diplomatic comments, whose only purpose is to inflame others. No one in this world can appreciate the risks of war than someone who has been there, and I fear soldiers could one day be under threat due to a secret that should have remained a secret. There are some truths that should be revealed, others that should not. It is a very fine line.


Doug # BC
said
0 0

To those who are outraged, how do you feel about the papers who are printing the material? Should they be charged with treason too?


Nathan
said
0 0

@ JD. Now, what good would come of publishing information about future strategies in the war? None; which is why they aren't publishing that information! Wikileaks is exploiting the people's government, that is supposed to be acting on the PEOPLE'S interests, rather than it's own. If you are so blind to see that even in our developed world, the government pulls the wool over the eyes of its people to protect and pursue its own interests then all hope may be lost for you. And for your comment about "being able to type opinions on CTV is a result of our troops being successful at war". Really? Did I miss the memo that Canada and the US are at risk of being invaded at the expense of our freedom or something? The current war on Terrorism is a lost cause, that will continue to be a lost cause with no goal, or favorable result possible. And while you think that information about this war may be harmful; in actual fact, it's the government's decision to declare war that is harmful, putting the US into greater deficits, and putting lives at risk that shouldn't be at risk. If you really cared about the troops sir, you should be on here fighting for them to come home.


Prof. Pye Chartt
said
0 0

Well, WikiLeaks better "step up" its output of "mind-blowing" information; otherwise, it will stand as nothing beyond a grossly overhyped electronic vehicle for Assange's own juvenile anti-Americanism and anti-war agenda. The only eye-popping revelation to be had, thus far, is Assange's own desperate hypocrisy in refusing to cooperate in the cursory determination of the "truth" surrounding his alleged sexual involvement with two women. (The mindless supporters of WikiLeaks are quick to point out that he's only wanted in Sweden for questioning, that no charges have been laid. Yeah; so, what's the rational justification for avoiding such a basic, non-threatening exercise like an unprincipled grandstander? Oh, right. Enter your conspiracy theory here.) How appropriate that the media-driven circus add another ring for our entertainment pleasure, in the form of Sarah Palin, every liberal and media moron's favorite political antichrist. She wants him "hunted down" and, perhaps, even killed -- the latter of which is what you're supposed to gather from the bullcrap artists at WikiLeaks. ...Run, Julian, run! She whispers marching orders into the ears of mentally unstable people! (Ridiculous brain candy for the lefty crowd. Assange hands it out to all the nodding nibs at his doorstep like it's Halloween.)


Carl M
said
0 0

How many times do I have to flush before this guy goes away??


Lz in Edmonton
said
0 0

@Tom, If you think he is adding another layer of accountability, you should read what governments around the world are doing in an attempt to FURTHER safeguard the information. Second, IF the world was a homogenious place of non-competing interests, then the information would be valuable. But since we are not living in a world where everyone gives each other hugs, vital military and even civilian information is carelessly being given to people and governments that can use this information to THEIR economic, military, and competing interests.


greg
said
0 0

How can it be wrong to reveal war crimes?


JD from K-Dub.
said
0 0

To the folks that say, "He's just releasing the truth":By leaking secrets of military and diplomatic operations overseas, he (and WikiLeaks) is opening a world of hurt for the troops. For example, by telling the world that a majoy combat push forward is going to start next week, the enemy has a chance to prepare, causing undue stress and risk to the troops. Of course, that's just an example but I'm sure you see the point. Some things are meant to be secret for a time and released later. Do you enjoy the freedom of writing your opnions down on CTVNews? You have that ability as a direct result of people keeping their mouths shut during the Wars.


tom91
said
0 0

Why is everyone afraid of the truth? All it does it adds another layer of accountability to governments and other organizations. A few bruised egos are a small price to pay.

david t
said
0 0

He is a threat to everyone in the USA & all the countries he is talking about in his leaks ...Would he be able to sleep at night if his leaks casued a huge war......This man is not helping anyone but the gossipers !!


George V.
said
0 0

Threats to step up leaks are just that,With those threats he hopes that Sweden, USA and Britain will back off on his extradition and receive a favourable plea bargain. Send him packing , the sooner the better.


MarcusRex
said
0 0

A truth from the Internet: If Assange was in China doing the same thing, the West would have called him a dissident and given him a Nobel Prize.The response of our governments towards Assange is proof that he and his whistle-blowing website, are necessary.Assange is wanted for QUESTIONING in an investigation that was dropped and then re-instated (mysteriously) in another country. So they arrest him? Strikes me as strange, not you? Since when does th UK arrest people FOR NO REASON?He hasn't been CHARGED with anything and, as far as we know, he hasn't even been accused of anything illegal.Yet government everywhere act as if he was Pol Pol or something.Strikes me as strange and it should WORRY all of us.


Paul ~ Kitchener
said
0 0

This is one issue that seems to gain so much news coverage & it should be let to pass into history. This individual has yet to face extradition, (hopefully soon), & a Danish court ~ Now That's news. It is reported that this link of news leaks will continue ~ SO WHAT ! LIfe is to short, and we need this information like the nation needs a flu epidemic. Lets put these releases where they belong ~ "LANDFILL".Lets put our time, and efforts, into making this nation a better society, by focusing on real news that will promote, Jobs - Health - Education - Social Needs !Leave the garbage news to the National Inquirer and those like it.


Gerald
said
0 0

Just a big nuisance with a huge ego.


Sam C
said
0 0

I love the description of Wikileaks as a "secret-spilling website." That's much more appropriate than calling it a "whistle-blowing website."


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Top Stories

Graham James is seen exiting the courthouse in Winnipeg, Wednesday, Feb. 22. 2012.

Graham James apologizes to victims, hockey community

More  3 Video(s) 3

Public Safety Minister Vic Toews (left)and Justice Minister Rob Nicholson take part in a news conference to announce measures protecting children from internet predators, in Ottawa, Tuesday, Feb. 14, 2012. (Fred Chartrand / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Canadians will likely pay for online surveillance bill

More   49 Comments 49    2 Video(s) 2

Remi Ochlik and Marie Colvin

Journalists grieve for slain comrades in Syria

More   20 Comments 20    7 Video(s) 7