News Sections
Document leak an 'attack on America,' Clinton says
CTV News Video
|
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Mon. Nov. 29 2010 8:29 PM ET
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton says the release of 250,000 secret documents to the Internet represents an attack on America and its allies.
Speaking in Washington, Clinton said the U.S. "strongly condemns the illegal disclosure of classified information," saying the act puts lives in danger, threatens national security and undermines diplomacy.
"Let's be clear, this disclosure is not just an attack on America's foreign policy interest, it is an attack on the international community, the alliances and partnerships, the conversations and negotiations that safeguard global security and advance economic prosperity," Clinton said.
The White House has been scrambling to contain the potential diplomatic disaster spurred by the release of the classified U.S. State Department documents, ordering U.S. agencies to review their safeguards on classified information.
On Monday, U.S. President Barack Obama's administration ordered a government-wide review of how agencies secure sensitive information. Announcing the assessment, the director of the White House's Office of Management and Budget, Jacob Lew, said that the disclosures are unacceptable and will not be tolerated.
Clinton said the documents don't expose wrongdoing, and serve no public purpose.
"There have been examples in history in which official conduct has been made public in the name of exposing wrongdoing or misdeeds," Clinton said.
"This is not one of those cases. In contrast what is being put on display in this cache of documents is that American diplomats are doing the work we expect them to do."
WikiLeaks posted the documents on its website on Sunday, just hours after it claimed a cyber attack had rendered the site inaccessible for much of the day.
The documents were nevertheless published on schedule, as they had been given in advance to The New York Times, Le Monde, the Guardian, Der Spiegel and others.
While they do not appear to reveal security secrets, they undoubtedly expose the rough underbelly of otherwise genteel diplomacy.
Highlights from the leaked documents include:
- evidence that Gulf monarchies -- including Saudi Arabia -- lobbied for the U.S. to destroy Iran's nuclear facilities calls for U.S diplomats at the United Nations to collect detailed data about the UN secretary general, his team and foreign diplomats
- details that the U.S. and South Korea were "gaming out an eventual collapse of North Korea"
- accounts of unsuccessful U.S. efforts to have Pakistani officials remove highly enriched uranium from a reactor out of fear that the material might wind up in an illicit bomb
- revelations of the hardline tactics used to compel countries to accept freed Guantanamo Bay detainees
The documents also reveal unusually candid impressions of both allies and foes, including a suggestion Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi "appears increasingly to be the mouthpiece of (Russian Prime Minister Vladimir) Putin" in Europe. According to the Guardian, Berlusconi was described in two separate cables as "feckless, vain, and ineffective as a modern European leader" whose "frequent late nights and penchant for partying hard mean he does not get sufficient rest."
German Chancellor Angela Merkel is described as risk-averse, while Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi is described as erratic and in the near constant company of a Ukrainian nurse who was described in one cable as "a voluptuous blonde."
Canada is mentioned too, in as many as 2,648 documents covering a range of topics from arms control to provincial affairs. The majority are not expected to be made public, however, until sometime this week at the earliest.
Italy's Foreign Minister Franco Frattini on Sunday called the release the "Sept. 11 of world diplomacy," in that everything that had once been accepted as normal has now changed.
In France, Foreign Ministry spokesperson Bernard Valero said "we strongly deplore the deliberate and irresponsible release of American diplomatic correspondence by the site WikiLeaks."
And in London, a spokesperson for British Prime Minister David Cameron said "it's important that governments are able to operate on the basis of confidentiality of information."
Pakistan's Foreign Ministry said it was an "irresponsible disclosure of sensitive official documents," while Iraq's foreign minister, Hoshyar Zebari, called the document release "unhelpful and untimely."
In Ottawa, Foreign Affairs Minister Lawrence Cannon said the "deplorable" leak did not serve anyone's interests and "may threaten our national security."
"If our government is found out to not be telling the truth, that could have a major impact. I have no doubt the other political parties will take this to the bank."
'Not an expression of policy'
But in its statement released Sunday, the White House downplayed the importance of whatever secret opinions the leaked cables may reveal.
"By its very nature, field reporting to Washington is candid and often incomplete information. It is not an expression of policy, nor does it always shape final policy decisions," the White House said.
"Nevertheless, these cables could compromise private discussions with foreign governments and opposition leaders, and when the substance of private conversations is printed on the front pages of newspapers across the world, it can deeply impact not only U.S. foreign policy interests, but those of our allies and friends around the world."
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange stood behind the release, charging that the White House was attempting to hide alleged proof of "human rights abuse and other criminal behavior" by Washington.
In Australia, Assange's home country, Attorney General Robert McClelland has said law enforcement officials are investigating whether WikiLeaks broke any laws.
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton is also expected to address the diplomatic repercussions later Monday, just as she is set to embark on a four-nation tour of Central Asia and the Middle East.
Clinton's first stop in Astana, Kazakhstan, will feature a summit of officials from the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, a diplomatic grouping that includes many officials from countries cited in the leaked cables.
User Tools
Related Stories
Related Websites
Most Popular
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
No one is asking Brad Wall or Dalton to ride naked with them. Asking a politician to do this is sexist pure and simple, even if he was joking.
Email
Comments are now closed for this story
peter in mb
0
said
0
James in Ottawa
0
said
0
Scott Shaubel
0
said
0
Frankieb
0
said
0
dan,vancouver
0
said
0
Only a Fox-inebriated moron could claim this is not 'news', and no news-service is even pretending otherwise. Whether the revelation will destabilize re-unification, as Hilary would probably claim is not news, but opinion.
But it IS news. It important news.
stevo
0
said
0
MirrorMirror
0
said
0
Lz in Edmonton
0
said
0
Loose Lips sink ships
0
said
0
Geoffrey West
0
said
0
B. Kelley, Ontario
0
said
0
Prof. Pye Chartt
0
said
0
PissedCanuck
0
said
0
Michael in Milton
0
said
0
Ken
0
said
0
Kevin Driver
0
said
0
rvdinc
0
said
0
Richard in New Brunswick
0
said
0
G. Gravelle
0
said
0
rodney
0
said
0
Malcolm
0
said
0
Chela Penser
0
said
0
AH in Calgary
0
said
0
Dan in Quebec
0
said
0
Ken
0
said
0
Biarrote
0
said
0
Doug
0
said
0
Charles Regina
0
said
0
URU
0
said
0
Greg - Signs and Wonders
0
said
0
Will
0
said
0
DED
0
said
0
Just sayin
0
said
0
tom91
0
said
0
Morris
0
said
0
they weren't telling the truth, it can't be
0
said
0
B. Kelley, Ontario
0
said
0
Intelligent Liberal
0
said
0
Zane
0
said
0
Jebus Widowmaker
0
said
0
Jack R
0
said
0
Vince M
0
said
0
thetruth1028
0
said
0
rvdinc
0
said
0
Jim in Calgary
0
said
0
Jim
0
said
0
James
0
said
0
jeremy
0
said
0
J Mat
0
said
0
Melanie Terrace,BC
0
said
0
J. E. Hoover
0
said
0
Mick
0
said
0
Linda in Vancouver
0
said
0
charlie
0
said
0
G Foggo
0
said
0
Zoltan in Langley
0
said
0
Prof. Pye Chartt
0
said
0
Mike
0
said
0
Howard in Brampton
0
said
0
Maple Leaf Whatever
0
said
0
rick
0
said
0
willyT
0
said
0
Doug # BC
0
said
0
In the situation you described,I fully agree that all politicians and all people be accountable for their actions.What you don't seem to be able to get your hands around,is that agreements are not settled in instants.They are arrived at through processes.In global affiars,meeting are held with many leaders present.Most don't come to the meeting in full agreement.So,a process takes place.Some alter their positions to be more concilliatory.Some make compromises so differing opinins can be reconciled to meet most of the leaders needs. During the process of agreeing,there are almost certainly many arguments.That's a good thing.It allows everyone to have an input.Even if the outcome will not satisfy everyone at the meetings,or involved in the debate,hearing both sides of a debate is the only rational way to form a concensus.It's not always a pretty process,but it is always a necessary process.And when an agreement is done,it must be supported by the entire team. These people are accountable for the work they have done.But the name calling and the nature of the debate that leads to the end result must remain private.No one who thinks his or her words will be public information,and used for some other political agenda,is ever going to speak frankly and honestly about extremely difficult issues,and fewer agreements or compromises will be the end result.That is not in anyone's best interests.
fred
0
said
0
BIGLIE
0
said
0
Mike
0
said
0
Buckanear
0
said
0
Lisa in BC
0
said
0
Dan in Quebec
0
said
0
SUPERSTARKS
0
said
0
totaljustice
0
said
0
Reader
0
said
0
Doug in Dartmouth
0
said
0
Richard D
0
said
0
JD
0
said
0
Sylvain
0
said
0
schpid
0
said
0
Brian Fr langley
0
said
0
RJ in Halifax
0
said
0
Steve/ Toronto
0
said
0
Deborah in Montreal
0
said
0
Neil R. in Waterloo
0
said
0
Henry Wysmulek
0
said
0
Kara
0
said
0
Pat - Toronto
0
said
0
Prof. Pye Chartt
0
said
0
Our neighborly "friendship" with the U.S. is a monumental social, political, economic, and diplomatic asset, and only ignorant fools regard it as any sort of liability overall, Tom. Thanks for the chuckle. (You don't have to "love" everything that America does, but as you're lounging this evening watching your favorite television programming, which is undoubtedly American, consider what "anti-Americanism" actually means, and the idiotic hypocrisy and ungratefulness it signals. Thanks again.)
Jamie
0
said
0
Steve T
0
said
0
Troy
0
said
0
dan,vancouver
0
said
0
chel in the Peg
0
said
0
dan,vancouver
0
said
0
Without this revelation, Canadians cannot decide the basis on which Mr. IgHarpRae wants to commit 'training' troops to Afghanistan for another 4 years. The Taliban infiltrators will no doubt appreciate the free training in methods, operations, fellow-trainees' identities, at any rate.
5 years, 6, 7...?
Nobel for WikiLeaks.
Outa Afghanistan for Canada.
Will
0
said
0
Chris, Toronto
0
said
0
Richard in New Brunswick
0
said
0
Prof. Pye Chartt
0
said
0
snoopy
0
said
0
tom91
0
said
0
Intelligent Liberal
0
said
0
frank
0
said
0
Jon in London ON
0
said
0
steve in halifax
0
said
0
Laurie in Moose Jaw
0
said
0
Paul ~ Kitchener
0
said
0
C Brown, Markham
0
said
0
Anthony
0
said
0
Ian Ottawa
0
said
0