Top Stories -   

1
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton is seen during a bilateral meeting with Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu, Monday, Nov. 29, 2010. (AP / Evan Vucci) U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder answers a question about WikiLeaks during a news conference at the Justice Department in Washington, Monday, Nov. 29, 2010. (AP / Charles Dharapak) Wikileaks is seen on Monday, Nov. 29, 2010. A man views a news stand displaying national newspapers, most carrying the story on WikiLeaks' release of classified U.S. State Department documents, at a newsagent in central London, Monday, Nov. 29, 2010. (AP / Sang Tan) This undated file photo obtained by The Associated Press shows U.S. Army Pfc. Bradley Manning. Founder of the WikiLeaks website, Julian Assange, speaks during a press conference in London, Saturday, Oct. 23, 2010. (AP / Lennart Preiss) Wikileaks is seen on Monday, Nov. 29, 2010. Wikileaks is seen on Monday, Nov. 29, 2010.

Document leak an 'attack on America,' Clinton says

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV National News: Joy Malbon on WikiLeaks
Whistleblowing website WikiLeaks' recent release embarrassed the U.S. administration as it spoke to its allies Monday and at the same time issued stern warnings to those behind the leaks.
CTV News Channel: Martin Collacott; Lucy Komisar
A former Canadian ambassador who is against the release of WikiLeaks' documents and investigative journalist Lucy Komisar who supports the release discuss the implications of the wistleblowing website's latest document release.
CTV News Channel: U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton makes her first official statement on the WikiLeaks controversy and says the Obama administration is taking this latest leak seriously and are taking steps to ensure this is the last one. She says whoever stole the information will be held responsible.
CTV News Channel: Paul Workman with D.C. reaction
CTV's Washington bureau chief discusses the significance of U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton saying that the release of 250,000 secret documents to the Internet represents an attack on America and its allies and that the act puts lives in danger, threatens national security and undermines diplomacy.
CTV News Channel: Lawrence Cannon on the leak
Foreign Affairs Minister Lawrence Cannon comments on the leaked secret documents saying he spoke with U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and says he does not believe the content is a matter for any concern. He also says the documents will not imperil the relationship between the U.S. and Canada.
CTV News Channel: Paul Frazer, former diplomat
A former Canadian diplomat talks about how the leak of 250,000 secret documents by Wikileaks will change the way diplomats will operate and how such leaks can be prevented in the future.
CTV News Channel: Colin Robertson, fmr. diplomat
A former Canadian diplomat says the fallout over the leaked documents for Canada could put the country's national security at risk, but it will not shake Canada's relations with the U.S.
CTV News Channel: Paul Heinbecker in Ottawa
A former ambassador to the UN discusses the WikiLeaks fallout. He says this is the biggest leak of classified documents in history, and explains problems will be created, as actual issues of serious merit have been revealed, in addition to other, more 'salacious,' issues.
Canada AM: Michel Juneau-Katsuya, former agent
A security expert and former CSIS agent discusses WikiLeaks' released documents. He says the information within the released documents are not really in the public's interest, and explains how diplomats' work has always been somewhat under cover.
Canada AM: Alan Bell, security expert
A security expert says this is the largest set of confidential documents ever to be released in the public domain. He explains how WikiLeaks is expected to soon release documents that pertain to the Canadian government in the coming weeks.
CTV National News: Richard Madan in Ottawa
More than 2,000 of the documents originated at U.S. embassies and consulates in Canada. U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton called Ottawa to discuss the leaks with Foreign Affairs Minister Lawrence Cannon as part of a damage control campaign.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (107) Facebook   

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton is seen during a bilateral meeting with Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu, Monday, Nov. 29, 2010. (AP / Evan Vucci) U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder answers a question about WikiLeaks during a news conference at the Justice Department in Washington, Monday, Nov. 29, 2010. (AP / Charles Dharapak) Wikileaks is seen on Monday, Nov. 29, 2010. A man views a news stand displaying national newspapers, most carrying the story on WikiLeaks' release of classified U.S. State Department documents, at a newsagent in central London, Monday, Nov. 29, 2010. (AP / Sang Tan) This undated file photo obtained by The Associated Press shows U.S. Army Pfc. Bradley Manning. Founder of the WikiLeaks website, Julian Assange, speaks during a press conference in London, Saturday, Oct. 23, 2010. (AP / Lennart Preiss) Wikileaks is seen on Monday, Nov. 29, 2010. Wikileaks is seen on Monday, Nov. 29, 2010.

Photos

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton is seen during a bilateral meeting with Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu, Monday, Nov. 29, 2010. (AP / Evan Vucci)

View Larger Image

Date: Mon. Nov. 29 2010 8:29 PM ET

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton says the release of 250,000 secret documents to the Internet represents an attack on America and its allies.

Speaking in Washington, Clinton said the U.S. "strongly condemns the illegal disclosure of classified information," saying the act puts lives in danger, threatens national security and undermines diplomacy.

"Let's be clear, this disclosure is not just an attack on America's foreign policy interest, it is an attack on the international community, the alliances and partnerships, the conversations and negotiations that safeguard global security and advance economic prosperity," Clinton said.

The White House has been scrambling to contain the potential diplomatic disaster spurred by the release of the classified U.S. State Department documents, ordering U.S. agencies to review their safeguards on classified information.

On Monday, U.S. President Barack Obama's administration ordered a government-wide review of how agencies secure sensitive information. Announcing the assessment, the director of the White House's Office of Management and Budget, Jacob Lew, said that the disclosures are unacceptable and will not be tolerated.

Clinton said the documents don't expose wrongdoing, and serve no public purpose.

"There have been examples in history in which official conduct has been made public in the name of exposing wrongdoing or misdeeds," Clinton said.

"This is not one of those cases. In contrast what is being put on display in this cache of documents is that American diplomats are doing the work we expect them to do."

WikiLeaks posted the documents on its website on Sunday, just hours after it claimed a cyber attack had rendered the site inaccessible for much of the day.

The documents were nevertheless published on schedule, as they had been given in advance to The New York Times, Le Monde, the Guardian, Der Spiegel and others.

While they do not appear to reveal security secrets, they undoubtedly expose the rough underbelly of otherwise genteel diplomacy.

Highlights from the leaked documents include:

  • evidence that Gulf monarchies -- including Saudi Arabia -- lobbied for the U.S. to destroy Iran's nuclear facilities calls for U.S diplomats at the United Nations to collect detailed data about the UN secretary general, his team and foreign diplomats
  • details that the U.S. and South Korea were "gaming out an eventual collapse of North Korea"
  • accounts of unsuccessful U.S. efforts to have Pakistani officials remove highly enriched uranium from a reactor out of fear that the material might wind up in an illicit bomb
  • revelations of the hardline tactics used to compel countries to accept freed Guantanamo Bay detainees

The documents also reveal unusually candid impressions of both allies and foes, including a suggestion Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi "appears increasingly to be the mouthpiece of (Russian Prime Minister Vladimir) Putin" in Europe. According to the Guardian, Berlusconi was described in two separate cables as "feckless, vain, and ineffective as a modern European leader" whose "frequent late nights and penchant for partying hard mean he does not get sufficient rest."

German Chancellor Angela Merkel is described as risk-averse, while Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi is described as erratic and in the near constant company of a Ukrainian nurse who was described in one cable as "a voluptuous blonde."

Canada is mentioned too, in as many as 2,648 documents covering a range of topics from arms control to provincial affairs. The majority are not expected to be made public, however, until sometime this week at the earliest.

Italy's Foreign Minister Franco Frattini on Sunday called the release the "Sept. 11 of world diplomacy," in that everything that had once been accepted as normal has now changed.

In France, Foreign Ministry spokesperson Bernard Valero said "we strongly deplore the deliberate and irresponsible release of American diplomatic correspondence by the site WikiLeaks."

And in London, a spokesperson for British Prime Minister David Cameron said "it's important that governments are able to operate on the basis of confidentiality of information."

Pakistan's Foreign Ministry said it was an "irresponsible disclosure of sensitive official documents," while Iraq's foreign minister, Hoshyar Zebari, called the document release "unhelpful and untimely."

In Ottawa, Foreign Affairs Minister Lawrence Cannon said the "deplorable" leak did not serve anyone's interests and "may threaten our national security."

"If our government is found out to not be telling the truth, that could have a major impact. I have no doubt the other political parties will take this to the bank."

'Not an expression of policy'

But in its statement released Sunday, the White House downplayed the importance of whatever secret opinions the leaked cables may reveal.

"By its very nature, field reporting to Washington is candid and often incomplete information. It is not an expression of policy, nor does it always shape final policy decisions," the White House said.

"Nevertheless, these cables could compromise private discussions with foreign governments and opposition leaders, and when the substance of private conversations is printed on the front pages of newspapers across the world, it can deeply impact not only U.S. foreign policy interests, but those of our allies and friends around the world."

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange stood behind the release, charging that the White House was attempting to hide alleged proof of "human rights abuse and other criminal behavior" by Washington.

In Australia, Assange's home country, Attorney General Robert McClelland has said law enforcement officials are investigating whether WikiLeaks broke any laws.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton is also expected to address the diplomatic repercussions later Monday, just as she is set to embark on a four-nation tour of Central Asia and the Middle East.

Clinton's first stop in Astana, Kazakhstan, will feature a summit of officials from the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, a diplomatic grouping that includes many officials from countries cited in the leaked cables.

Comments are now closed for this story

peter in mb
said
0 0

If someone in a position of trust leaks military secrets to an enemy it is called high treason. I would strongly suggest that the jack a$$es at Wikileaks consider this before spilling the beans and damaging their country’s relations with their allies or they might just find a price on their heads. We all have Freedom of speech but we all can be held accountable for what we say!!!


James in Ottawa
said
0 0

Wikileaks must be doing something right if they can upset the Americans and Iranians at the same time.


Scott Shaubel
said
0 0

. if you did it, or said it, then you did it or said it,.. that's the way it is,.. if you can't admit to, and face the facts, then don't do it,..... Everyone makes their own choices. He who endures to the end, shall have Salvation... Every Being is Good, Pure and (super)Natural, regardless of anything. Perhaps, a bit mis-guided (for sure, more than a bit). Redemption, or paying for your sins, is how you get to the end


Frankieb
said
0 0

I do not believe it is an attack on America. But I do believe the US government keeps their own people in darkness regarding the truth. Just like they did on Vietnam until that info showed the state of the war. Lies will keep the people patriotic.

dan,vancouver
said
0 0

WikiLeaks shows that Beijing supports reunification of the Koreas.

Only a Fox-inebriated moron could claim this is not 'news', and no news-service is even pretending otherwise. Whether the revelation will destabilize re-unification, as Hilary would probably claim is not news, but opinion.

But it IS news. It important news.


stevo
said
0 0

According to the article, Foreign Affairs Minister Lawrence Cannon said "If our government is found out to not be telling the truth, that could have a major impact. I have no doubt the other political parties will take this to the bank." Let me get this straight, Cannon is worried that if Canada is lying it could have a major impact. No kidding Einstein! My question is why are you worried that someone might find out Canada is lying unless Canada IS lying. If Canada has not been lying there is nothing in the documents to worry about.Whether it's Canada or any other country mentioned the only reason any country should be worried is if the documents prove that they are lying.


MirrorMirror
said
0 0

Behaving honorably and with moral intent has never gotten anybody into any real trouble. If you are doing things you don't want the whole world to see, then at least be smart enough to never put onto digital paper anything you wouldn't want the New York Times to print. Even Cheney was known for never writing anything down. Look how quickly they launched a criminal investigation on the release of the possible diplomatic gaffes, but yet the criminal investigation on the financial debacle is as slow as molasses if it even exists.


Lz in Edmonton
said
0 0

What, there is nothing about UFO's? They must exist.....


Loose Lips sink ships
said
0 0

There is a wartime saying, "Loose Lips sink ships".Even if you leak information by mistake, it is a chargeable offence. The U.S serviceman who leaked this information, on purpose, will no doubt get life, and maybe put to death... yes.. he could be put on death row for treason. Even in Canada, Treason could result in being at the bad end of a rope. The Aussie Wikki Leak founder should get the punishment as the U.S serviceman, but we know that will not happen... he has money.


Geoffrey West
said
0 0

Well, it is a nice attempt by Clinton to try to turn the tables on truth. Attack on America!!? What is the government doing to others and to its own citizens!? The only lives this release is going to hurt are the elitists who have already begun losing control of their plan for global control. Mark my words...we are witnessing the dying breaths of a desperate cabal of elitists who have been desperately hiding truth, and creating false-flag events to keep their control. However, having now written that, I also send love and Light to this dark cabal, and thank them for doing what they have done, allowing so many to begin awakening at this time to how humanity has been enslaved by them. They are as much a part of the ONENESS of LIFE as we are, so I send energies for their own awakening and surrender to the coming changes, for the highest good of humanity and our planet!


B. Kelley, Ontario
said
0 0

What really scares me is that the current political regime in the US (both Dems and GOP) will use this as justification for putting heavier clamps on freedom of the press. They obviously have little effective control over security of their own documents and there isn't much they can do about an Australian publishing them on the internet from Europe. What they might very well try is to restrict the US press from reporting on such releases in future in the worn out name of national security. There are already noises being made in the US Congress about mandating "balanced reporting" so its not really outside the realm of possibility for government to try to control news content that it views as sensitive. It happens all the time in Canada with our courts routinely issuing bans on publication of evidence or witness names in criminal trials. The unofficial motto of the last few presidencies has been "Never let a good crises go to waste!". This one is really too good to give it a pass.


Prof. Pye Chartt
said
0 0

Hillary is simply trying to frame a crime, politically. A nifty cell at Guantanamo is probably being contemplated for Assange right now, for, as a purveyor and disseminator of classified information working illegally, he is an "enemy" of the West (particularly the U.S.), and a threat to Western security. Well, at least, that's the necessary spin. Make no mistake, however, I support Julian Assange of WikiLeaks' right to be an asinine, childish, counterproductive, idiotic, unthinking, politically-motivated attention whore capable of proving little beyond his own media-manufactured self-importance. Mr. Assange is an anti-American jackass with an agenda that has precious little to do with the public good. He's a calculating and manipulative self-aggrandizer desperate to be the conductor of the orchestra. Undoubtedly, he appreciates everyone bringing their own instruments to the hall.


PissedCanuck
said
0 0

When and if Mr. Assange is found, he should be shipped to Guantánamo Bay and be locked up for sometime and then be tried as a terrorist himself as stated by Mrs. Clinton.


Michael in Milton
said
0 0

I have never been Anti-American in any way....however.... it is time our friends south of the border took collective responsibility for all the meddling into other countries affairs over the decades and all the self interest war engagements they have taken on which have been a burden to the US taxpayer. All these issues were not all in the name of righteousness by any stretch. Now they are trying to intimidate the Wikileaks folks into covering up what their contributors obviously feel are inappropriate actions on the part of the US Gov. Let the papers fall where they may. There needs to be a house cleaning and a revealing of what Obama and his cohorts are up to. What goes around comes around and its time the US got theirs too.


Ken
said
0 0

If the US or China for that matter wanted to snoop on my private emails, as boring as they might be, I'm sure they could and would without asking. The fact is that we are living during a time of an information revolution. As with any revolution, there will be growing pains, and in the end I hope the world will be a better place. Remember the saying "Sticks and Stones". In my opinion (so far) for the most part the leaks contain nothing more than childish playground gossip. hmmm...do you really think Harper is wearing a toupe?


Kevin Driver
said
0 0

This guys is just another US hater blaming the states for all the worlds ills. What gets me is that people here are going along with it. You cannot think for a minute that every other country is not guilty of the same sorts of things. Some of this garbage is just pretty much common sence Ban Ki Moon the CIA did some checks on him well they want to know wat kind of a person they are dealing with, the same would go for anyone. Why does he not post Chinas secrets or Irans and North Koreas if he had them, I will tell you why because countries like that would have no problems sending people to deliver a message.We do not need to know every dirty little secret of a government.


rvdinc
said
0 0

did any of these leaks ssay who really killed JFK?


Richard in New Brunswick
said
0 0

Madam Secretary I agree that "the act puts lives in danger, threatens national security and undermines diplomacy" but whose fault is that? You certainly can't blame the messenger who has delivered them to we, the people. You and your fellow "conspirators in secrets" need look only in your mirrors to meet the creators of these documents. If you folks weren't so fully engaged spending our money in non-stop cloak and dagger espionage and counterespionage against and with all the other scheming bureaucrats and CIA types around the world the revelation of these "cables" would present no threat... because there wouldn't be any to reveal!

G. Gravelle
said
0 0

What I'd like to know is why the founder of Wikileaks hasn't been arrested and charged for being in possession of stolen material. His actions are nothing more than theft and he should be treated just like any other thief.


rodney
said
0 0

either it was said or not said in diplomatic channels , and frankly it might work being illegal if us law was THE law around the world, fortunately..this is and never will be the case


Malcolm
said
0 0

It's more amazing the American gov can't find out who is leaking all this stuff. They have one corporal in jail. He'll be lucky if he is only sentenced to life. But who leaked 2 million documents? and they can't find the people doing it. It's crazy But are any of us really surprised but some of the stuff Really.The one thing that wiki has to live with is today 6 American soldiers gunned down. If it comes back to they attacked because of the info released the U.S. gov should go after the owner of wiki for murder. Or better the family members should sue him for multi millions, that would hurt him more.Either way it's disgraceful.


Chela Penser
said
0 0

At the risk of sounding like a terrorist I ask why hasn't the U.S. government shut down the website then if they don't like it. Just asking.


AH in Calgary
said
0 0

@tom91. You are absolutley right. Well said.


Dan in Quebec
said
0 0

Clinton is the new spin doctor. Talk about a panic phrase out of George Bushes book. Here we go......


Ken
said
0 0

This is a breath of fresh air!


Biarrote
said
0 0

Have the guy who leaked the information arrested, and tried for treason. If one person dies because of the leak add up murder charges.


Doug
said
0 0

Whine all you want gutless Canadians but our freedom is guaranteed only by our close proximity to the United States.Without their support and protection, those who choose to invade our soil would not give a damn about all the Canadian human rights whiners.It is time we allowed the elected leaders of the U.S. to do their jobs without providing inside information to every armchair political quarterback with time on their hands.


Charles Regina
said
0 0

Hey Zane,Say hello to about 75%, (and growing!) of the worlds' population! People have been brainwashed to stop thinking, (tv, media, etc) and it keeps on continuing. A society divided amongst itself cannot stand. Too bad we jailed all the hippies who do know the truth...


URU
said
0 0

Now she sounds like Sarah Palin with no brians!!! It's more of the other way around, America attacking other nations secretly. The US is trying so desparately to put a spin on the leaked documents and blame others to calm fears around the world. Perhaps, its best to stay out of other nations internal affairs and there wouldn't be anything on records!!!! This is like dumb and dumber.


Greg - Signs and Wonders
said
0 0

BILLIONS !!!!!!! Spent to ensure the safety of Americans and one of their own leaks documents to a European who publishes them.Feel safe? I wouldn't


Will
said
0 0

If this twit wanted to do something meaningfull and actually usefull to the world, he'd be looking for more proof of the AGW/Climate Change fraud. It might not be as sexy as pursuing an anti-american agenda but it would mean a lot more.


DED
said
0 0

This kind of move is at very least immoral, if not illegal - probably both. This may not be the worst of internet but it certain rates high. Any indiv idual or organization that would deliberately target international relations by making public information that they had no right too - should be dealt with appropriately. Maybe the rest of the world shouild support the move to have him face the rape charges against him. Obviously he is not any knight in shining armor.


Just sayin
said
0 0

blame wiki all you want Hillary, but it's your statement and the headlines that made me want to read the documents...if CTV and the rest of the media weren't so eager to report on it, i would have no idea they even existed....hmmm


tom91
said
0 0

LOL!! I predicted this. The spin doctors would tailor this as an attack and as wikileaks as terrorists. What's next? Speak against the USA and you will be labeled a terrorists, not much unlike the way the media treats all criticism of Israel as anti-semitism. Hillarious!


Morris
said
0 0

They're just embarrassed by the hurtful words being exposed. I think it's funny to tell you the truth. Exposes them for who we already know who they are....hypocrites.


they weren't telling the truth, it can't be
said
0 0

i would have to think the only danger is that the people will know the truth, i can't imagine politicians not being honest in everything they say at face value,(lol), the truth hurts, that's the problem, the only good that could come from this is that the people hiding secrets, get thrown out to dry,i can only imagine the secret meeting going on today to try and crawl out of this one, just like bombing iraq, no good reason for that either, but they sure knew how to spin it, gotta love the leaders of the planet, let the good times roll.


B. Kelley, Ontario
said
0 0

The biggest enemies of the U.S. are not people who leak diplomatic cables but those like Hillary Clinton with her inept and amateurish attempts at foreign relations. Virtually everything she has touched has been an unmitigated failure from the Iranian and North Korean situations to screwing up whatever chance there might have been for some peace in the middle east. She reminds me of a seagull that flies in, squawks loudly, craps all over everything and then flies triumphantly off into the sky. I'd love to read the private cables sent by diplomats from those countries after they met with Hillary.


Intelligent Liberal
said
0 0

I agree with Hilary, this is an attack on America and its allies, which probably includes Canada. This wikileak fellow is in big trouble! Hilary is NOT AMUSED, and neither is Uncle Sam, well auntie Sam I suppose since Hilary is female, but anyway to quote a former President, "If you're not for us, then your a guiness!" Once Afgan is taken care of, wiki is next.


Zane
said
0 0

Only a complete fool or someone completely naive could think that these kind of machinations don't exist. These exposures just bring into the light of reality; the underpinnings of our way of life and when anybodies dirty laundry is hung out for all to see, they always respond with indignation and justification. The old saying of Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely comes to mind.


Jebus Widowmaker
said
0 0

This isn't an attack on America. This is the beginning to the end of the FREE internet. So called attacks like these are going to occure and be used to bring in a controlled internet. Is another of our freedoms to be lost. Speak now or forever loss your change to speak.


Jack R
said
0 0

I guess the old adage "Truth hurts, don't it" should be applied here. Apparently, with 'friends' like America, we really don't need enemies.


Vince M
said
0 0

Wonder if any of the leaks tell us how the he!! Obama got a Nobel Peace prize?


thetruth1028
said
0 0

Who wants to bet that nothing changes after these documents are leaked...and in 2 weeks it will be business as usual?...just saying


rvdinc
said
0 0

can someone please explain how they got the cables in the first place? Were they handed to wikileaks or did they hack into the US governments servers and take them?If they stole them then they need to go to jail for this.however the US needed a kick in the ass to show them what can happen.


Jim in Calgary
said
0 0

I don't believe for a minute that our "National Security" is at stake. Considering the move towards One World Governance (communism) I just don't believe that any of these politicians are the least bit concerned about our security or sovereignty. What they are worried about is getting caught doing deals that benefit them personally. It's always a matter of following the money if you want the truth as there is little if any integrity left in any government anywhere. Especially the US.


Jim
said
0 0

Does the government have an obligation to tell who was involved and why? We live in a democracy with free speech. Was there unnecessary wiretapping? It makes one wonder and they deserve an answer with or without a lawyer.


James
said
0 0

Clinton said "the documents don't expose wrongdoing". Then why all the fuss? Hmm? Also, Assange is just reporting/releasing information that was given to him. You can't hold him responsible for the release, if you do, you have to hold every new reporting agency responsible as well, since they are now distributing the same stolen information. ie: Don't shoot the messenger.


jeremy
said
0 0

As long as people are not put in jeopardy I can't say I see the harm. really a little egg on a couple peoples faces.I was told the wiki site is full of spy software malware


J Mat
said
0 0

If Assange is attacked it will trigger a peace movement this world has never seen since the Vietnam war.


Melanie Terrace,BC
said
0 0

If those pople who think these leaks are OK,I wonder how they would react to the right of the public to know "everything" that goes on in government. How about free access to the list of people who are on welfare,and living off the earnings of their neighbours.How about public access to lists of people who abuse,or who just use the medical system? Those are tax dollars supporting those systerms. We do believe in transparency.The argument is about where we draw the line,because we all have views on what should be public,and what should not.But if private meeting among our leaders are "fair game",how can it be that the same does not apply to private citizens.Surely they have nothing to hide either.Why should taxpayers not know who is living off of their tax dollars? Who is using "free" government services and programs? Who is comitting crime and avoiding justice? Who is paying taxes,and how much? Who will discuss anything serious with someone who can't be discreet?Without serious discussion,how will anything controversial ever get done? Transparency is a good thing.But taken to the extreme,it can cause more damage than it's potential for any good results.


J. E. Hoover
said
0 0

There is a saying where I work, "Chaos creates cash". Somebody is going to benefit from this and it's probably monetary. Just another American trying to live "the american dream" and become wealthy. But I do think that all people should be accountable for their actions, including politicians. These are the people supposed to be running our Countries, we should at least be able to trust them...don't you think?


Mick
said
0 0

"You can't handle the truth." All democracies have their secrets. The idea that the general public should be privy to this information is obsurd. If the public were made aware of all that goes on in the world, there would be chaos. We already know too much. Why is it, do you think, that presidents of the USA begin in office looking young and vibrant, but inevitibly become grey and tired. Look at Obama in just 2 years. These men know things that most of us could not handle, and I for one would rather be oblivious too. Although the information presented by Wikileaks is rather mundane, it's a very dangerous precident to set. This is only the beginning, and our democracies are being threatened from the insuing chaos. Since 9/11 we are gradually losing our democratic freedoms, and Wikileaks is not helping the situation. I will finish by asking a question. Do you tell your closest friends, exactly what you are thinking of them all the time?


Linda in Vancouver
said
0 0

Looking at security now seems a bit like locking the barn door AFTER the horse is gone". This issue brings several thing to mind.The first being that what this self serving Aussie is doing is as close to reason as anyone can get without crossing that line.He's betraying his nation and it's allies,for his own personal gain. Secondly,it seems to me that anyone who ever hires another person,is at risk of having their faith in that person betrayed.The soldier in custody now,accussed of leaking these documents,was trusted to do his job.His decision to betray that trust will,as it should be, find him help accountable,even though the damage may not be easily repaired.But holding the person who hired him accountable may never be possible. Thirdly,to the point of what people say in private meetings,remember,we're talking about Americans here.They truly believe they are better than everyone else.It's in their DNA.They teach their kids the same thing.My American born girl friend,educate in WA state,tells me they learn that BC is like Hawai and Alaska were at one time.Foreign locations waiting for staus as American states.They talk like that because their governments taught them like that.And,while I was very impressed at their exemplary manners during the Olympics here,the horror stories I re-call about some of the things I've heard from visiting American sailors,people like John Wayne,visiting clergymen,etc,etc,and they are not complimentary."American Exceptionalism" and jingoism are alive and well in the USA. But,we can be better than that,remain alles with the USA,but just watch our backs.


charlie
said
0 0

Twice (this is the thrid time) I have asked what responsibility the media has in publishing stolen material which has the potential for serious harm to individuals and countries. Twice my comments have been censored or ignored. Let's have a bit of courage and open this topic for discussion.


G Foggo
said
0 0

It sounds to me that the American diplomats have been very undiplomatic. They have been very unsensative to their host nations and very arrogant . This has caused a very unfortunate and untimely situation that should not have happened. But the Americans have only themselves to blame. Time to teach their diplomats diplomacy.


Zoltan in Langley
said
0 0

Ian Ottawa wrote "If you can't say it to my face then don't say it at all." Lofty words but totally unrealistic and disingenuous.There is a great biblical proverb from Ecclesiastes 7:20 to 22, "Surely there is not a righteous man on earth who does good and never sins. Do not take to heart all the things that people say, lest you hear your servant cursing you. Your heart knows that many times you yourself have cursed others."I shudder to think of how other nations would frankly assess certain world leaders. Let us be adult about this and stop whining that people get hurt when others use mean words. The real story hear is that Wikileaks is a propaganda arm for any force standing against the US no matter how vile.


Prof. Pye Chartt
said
0 0

I, too, am "amused" by the chirping crickets that are the pro-Palestinian, pro-Iranian, anti-Israel, anti-American nibs now sitting in a corner with a Dunce Cap on, after learning that "Gulf monarchies" (Saudi Arab et al) politely begged the U.S. to strike crazy, anti-Semitic Iran's nuclear facilities. Gee, I thought that "everybody" was convinced that crackpot-led Iran was a stable, unthreatening country, and Israel was the big upsetting force in the Middle East. Oh, back to school, I guess. This time I'll avoid being "educated" at the Left-Wing Kindergarten for Foreign Studies.


Mike
said
0 0

Please stop pointing fingers at the person that leaked this information and Assange for posting it!The US government is supposed to be democratically elected, this means their actions, and motives are supposed to be transparent and free for all of their citizens to view so they can make a sound decision concerning their ability to govern their country!What does this say about our society when people look to hang a person for creating the transparency that ALL voters in a free and democratic society deserve! Is this not what Canadian politicians and those in the US keep throwing in our face when they decide to invade countries and kill hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians (then call them militant in the media). Our democracy has turned into more of a dictatorship with secret police, the hiding of government activities, inhibiting citizens from protesting, etc. Communist Russia was better as they didn't lie to their citizens and call themselves a democratic society!


Howard in Brampton
said
0 0

All this controversy is rather unremarkable in that it's just another display of human nature. Most people are hypocritical in their very nature, and politicians and diplomats are not immune, nor above it. Diplomacy by it's very nature is all about subterfuge, duplicity, and having to read between the lines. Conventional wisdom tells us, "it prevents misunderstanding and unnecessary wars. As a result, you have to dig for the truth. What if your children decided to deal with you the way the diplomats deal with each other? I'd be willing to bet it would frustrate the hell out of any busy parent who has no time for games, yet most of those same parents would decry what Julian Assange at WikiLeaks has done, saying it puts people at risk. If your children display behavior that you find unacceptable, why would you tolerate that behavior in your politicians and Government? What puts people at risk are lies, half truths, and misguided strategic foreign interests in the name of diplomacy.


Maple Leaf Whatever
said
0 0

The world will know about Canadian arms control and provincial politics. OMG!! The truth about the long gun registery and our failing health care will be known to the world. What will they think? What will they do? We are weakened! Quick everyone, to the borders and stand on guard for thee!


rick
said
0 0

ALL Canadian citizens are poised to be outraged, angry, beyond the ability to forgive if they learn that somebody in the American diplomatic community has made a dispearaging remark about our beloved leaders.

willyT
said
0 0

@ Prof. Pye Chartt - excellent ( as usual ) - Looking back at all those years in the "Electronic Communications" area in our Canadian Forces, i have never seen (and hopefully it stays that way) one of our Signal Corp. members "go sour" as has happened with that military member stateside. Lets hope Safeguards are put in place because with todays WWW, one mistake and we end up with what you see in the headlines today.


Doug # BC
said
0 0

I'm sorry "JD",but you are just plain wrong to suggest that we "should have access to all my correspondence............" Life just doesn't work like that.
In the situation you described,I fully agree that all politicians and all people be accountable for their actions.What you don't seem to be able to get your hands around,is that agreements are not settled in instants.They are arrived at through processes.In global affiars,meeting are held with many leaders present.Most don't come to the meeting in full agreement.So,a process takes place.Some alter their positions to be more concilliatory.Some make compromises so differing opinins can be reconciled to meet most of the leaders needs. During the process of agreeing,there are almost certainly many arguments.That's a good thing.It allows everyone to have an input.Even if the outcome will not satisfy everyone at the meetings,or involved in the debate,hearing both sides of a debate is the only rational way to form a concensus.It's not always a pretty process,but it is always a necessary process.And when an agreement is done,it must be supported by the entire team. These people are accountable for the work they have done.But the name calling and the nature of the debate that leads to the end result must remain private.No one who thinks his or her words will be public information,and used for some other political agenda,is ever going to speak frankly and honestly about extremely difficult issues,and fewer agreements or compromises will be the end result.That is not in anyone's best interests.


fred
said
0 0

BRAVO for Mr. Assange it's about time someone reveal the truth about these two face hypocrites.And what is worse they try to make us believe that they are honest and truthful. They are backstabber'sand too stupid to realize that this could happen they; made their bed now "lie in it " to your detriments.


BIGLIE
said
0 0

Treason!The free world dosen't need this guy to enlighten our enemies.


Mike
said
0 0

We all know that there is not a government on this planet that is perfect. Perhaps this proves that the Americans are far from it, but as a Canadian, there is not one other country in the world I would rather have as our neighbours than the Americans. Should anything ever happen to Canada, I guarantee that they would be the first ones we would call.


Buckanear
said
0 0

I'm all about accountability, and keeping a check and balance with people in power. So far I haven't seen any negative affect on our military. So what's the big deal? I think this absolutely hillarios, and an interesting characterization of our leadership. The only thing at steak here is character, which is refreshing to say the least. Here we get to see the real colours of our politicians What's not to like, they are after all public servants! LOL Keep it up Wiki, the more the merrier.


Lisa in BC
said
0 0

This is wrong...the guy that made this site and released these documents should be arrested and locked up. I get that people want to know, but putting people at risk because you want your 15 minutes of fame is just wrong!


Dan in Quebec
said
0 0

@ Doug in Dartmouth Your argument does not hold. My wife and I were not elected into public office and do not represent countries and influence millions of people through back room politics. Do we need to be reminded that one of the worlds most powerful countries runs on deception and ignorance of its own people. These leaks are no more than a drop in the bucket.


SUPERSTARKS
said
0 0

I think schpid is kinda right, so far none of it was that big of a deal or really all that unknown. This guy is just looking for some attention.


totaljustice
said
0 0

"Shouldn't people be more concerned with the individual that actually committed treason by leaking the documents?"I agree with Chris in Toronto. What happend to the individual who released the documents. An earlier CTV report stated that the first catastrophic release of documents was made by a disgruntled American Service member. There has been no mention of that mess since. The penalties for that kind of security breach are usually swift and severe for any military but we have heard nothing of that whistleblower since. Is the US government going after that person?


Reader
said
0 0

I like how most media emphasizes the name calling as the content of the release. Nice way to distract, and perhapse fool few. The real deal is the plans and stage preparing deals that are going one like the ones mentioned in this article. It is sad to see that governments think of the people are bunch of simple minded people!


Doug in Dartmouth
said
0 0

For all those who think that the release of this information is okay,consider all the conversations you have had privately with a spouse, co-worker,boss, etc. Private conversations are that. Private.It is rather amusing that news agencies that want us to respect their rights to protect their sources of information, are prepare to post information that could destablize the world.


Richard D
said
0 0

I'm not sure what this so-called security expert is talking about when he says, "this could probably have a serious impact on relationships with individuals, between the countries and also the alliances that are in place," but somehow thinks that this is not an impact on national security. If this can impact our relationships between countries and within the alliances we are a part of, then it can't help but impact our national security.


JD
said
0 0

Addressing Steve T's comment: If you were paying me and my "staff" to run all affairs for the common weal of the country, you should, indeed, have access to all of my correspondence while I'm "serving" in a public capacity. Everyone, including politicians, should be held accountable for their actions (esp the spending of taxpayers' money).


Sylvain
said
0 0

I agree that there is a certain amount of secrecy necessary to carry out diplomatic relations. While it is a lot more serious it is kind of like playing poker. It is acceptable to bluff and try to read your opponents tells. Showing one players cards kind or ruins the game. Not only for that player! That sort of thing has been known to start fights. It is likely these documents will eventually show, the US has been engaging in some ethically questionable behavior. This will not be a surprise, but the scope may be.Diplomatic relationships will be harmed and egos bruised. This could badly damage the US ability to win support to deal will the likes of Iran and North Korea. That will do none of us any good.While we are busy bashing the big badly behaved US gorilla we should all remember that the US is a big player in the world balance. Knock over the gorilla and the crazy monkeys will have one less reason to keep in line.The US has been standing over many of us with a greater than thou attitude for far too long. Telling us how we should run our democracies while eroding the civil liberties of their own population. Driven by an overwhelming sense or insecurity and paranoia they have been slowly eroding the freedom they proclame to hold so dear.


schpid
said
0 0

That's it? Most of the points here have already been in the news or, if you have any clue about how foreign affairs actualy work, not surprising. The US.S. Korea issue is not a plot to take down N. Korea but a table top of what would happen if the north suddenly found itself free of it's dictatorship. You can bet there would be chaos and mass refugees if that were to happen. The Gulf countries wanting the US to do their dirty work so they can say their hands are clean? Surprise surprise.The Canada issue with Karzai was heavily reported even on this website.So far BIG DEAL


Brian Fr langley
said
0 0

Saudi Arabia is asking the U.S. to destroy Iran's nuclear cababilities?? and yet not a peep from the howlers of outrage who would excoriate Israel had they suggested the same. Turn away illicit cargo from gaza? Attack a sovereign nation? Perhaps the Saudi's would have been better off asking the Israeli's. As the say ing says "the enemy of my enemy is my friend"


RJ in Halifax
said
0 0

I find it interesting that the only "leaks" that this individual publishes are from the U.S. While this indicates a problem with security in the U.S. it is also a revelation of Mr. Assanges personal beliefs. He does not appear to have retrieved for publishing, any confidential documents from such countries as Iran, Syria, Libya or Russia. Is this because they have better security, or is he afraid of what their secret police divisions would do to him? Seems he's letting his anti-US attitude, plus his knowledge that the US would not sanction a "hit" show through.


Steve/ Toronto
said
0 0

The Devourers work ,Mark 13:8.Matt 14:7 ...Divide and conquer through an isolationist agenda.Nations now won't Trust anybody,it renders diplomacy useles and undermines peace for everyone.


Deborah in Montreal
said
0 0

Bravo WikiLeaks - our polititians are forgetting who put them in place - we pay them to serve US and we have the RIGHT to know what they are doing.


Neil R. in Waterloo
said
0 0

During the Vietnam War, RAND corporation whistle blower "Daniel Ellsberg" released "The Pentagon Papers" showing that the US government continually lied to the public about what was going on. He was initially portrayed as traitor but his leaked information triggered congress to hold hearings which eventually ended the war. Now Ellsberg is considered a hero. We need more transparency and wikileaks is one way to get it.


Henry Wysmulek
said
0 0

So what exactly is this guy hoping to accomplish or is he just trying to embarrass people?


Kara
said
0 0

treason schmeason. Democracy is front for those who control the banks, its a rat race that has only made the wealthy wealthier, and the poor more numerous. Weather you realise you are a part of a big oily machine, and you as an indvidual don't actually matter is 100% up to you. A real democracy wouldn't have secrets, simply because it is a government of the people, how can the masses be expected to vote when we have no idea what is going on? Easy, because the votes don't matter, they are bought and paid for by the people who think money is real. We need to reorganize our selves and our government.


Pat - Toronto
said
0 0

Most of what was leaked is controversial but the leak about South Korea and the U.S. planning strategy against the North Koreans could be deadly. Very irresponsible of this man to leak such comments which could lead to another world war. I don't care about the other stuff.. and no, I don't believe Stephen Harper wears a wig.. but if he does, who cares? What I do care about is world security and what these leaks could set in place..


Prof. Pye Chartt
said
0 0

@ tom91: You're right, there isn't anything wrong with being anti-American...if you're a left-wing coconut who doesn't get that the U.S. is Canada's critical trading partner, and our branch-plant economy is underpinned by American corporations employing a huge pile of Canadians, the U.S. is our closet military and foreign-policy ally, the U.S. contributes more in international aid and diplomatic efforts towards peace (ie. Israeli/Palestinian, the U.N., Haiti, etc.) than anybody, by far, and Uncle Sam is Canada's security blanket, in terms of national protection, if global excrement hit the fan. (After apologizing profusely, you'd be clutching and hiding behind Uncle Sam's pant leg if WW3 broke out.)
Our neighborly "friendship" with the U.S. is a monumental social, political, economic, and diplomatic asset, and only ignorant fools regard it as any sort of liability overall, Tom. Thanks for the chuckle. (You don't have to "love" everything that America does, but as you're lounging this evening watching your favorite television programming, which is undoubtedly American, consider what "anti-Americanism" actually means, and the idiotic hypocrisy and ungratefulness it signals. Thanks again.)


Jamie
said
0 0

As of this morning..they had only released 226 cables not the full amount. They will be released slowly and none mention Canada yet.


Steve T
said
0 0

Here's what I'm going to do. Randomly gather snippets of your most private emails, without any context, and publish them for everyone to see. Will you stand behind me as a purveyor of the "truth"?


Troy
said
0 0

I firmly believe the US should, and may do, simply shut this guy down. A preemptive cyber-attack.


dan,vancouver
said
0 0

Karzai's brother advocates a return to tribalism and hasn't the slightest interest in 'democracy'. Without this revelation, Canadians cannot decide the basis on which Mr. IgHarpRae wants to commit 'training' troops to Afghanistan for another 4 years. The Taliban infiltrators will no doubt appreciate the free training in methods, operations, fellow-trainees' identities, at any rate.5 years, 6, 7...? Outa there next summer. Wake up Canada.


chel in the Peg
said
0 0

I'm on the fence with all this - perhaps "forced transparency" is the new reality. Should be interesting to see what happens to the young private who leaked the docs to Wiki in the first place. I've heard he could get 20 years.


dan,vancouver
said
0 0

The full WikiLeak's story on Karzai's brother: he advocates a return to tribalism and hasn't the slightest interest in 'democracy'.

Without this revelation, Canadians cannot decide the basis on which Mr. IgHarpRae wants to commit 'training' troops to Afghanistan for another 4 years. The Taliban infiltrators will no doubt appreciate the free training in methods, operations, fellow-trainees' identities, at any rate.

5 years, 6, 7...?

Nobel for WikiLeaks.

Outa Afghanistan for Canada.


Will
said
0 0

This twit is not a champ, he is a self absorbed, attention seeking idiot. Or as Shakespeare said: "much ado about nothing"


Chris, Toronto
said
0 0

Funny that everybody is talking about Assange. He's just reporting what somebody else leaked. (A U.S. reporter would be a hero for reporting such secrets of China or Russia) Shouldn't people be more concerned with the individual that actually committed treason by leaking the documents?


Richard in New Brunswick
said
0 0

On the surface, especially if you tend toward jingoism, his actions are tantamount to treason. But there's a far more important issue involved and that is the almost universal culture amongst the politicians, the bureaucrats, the military-industrial complexians that says its not only OK but essential to lie and cheat and steal and murder, especially if you can claim it's "for your country" and even more especially if you can profit from it. Whatever information is being leaked belongs to the people and I applaud Assange for leaking it. "Oh what a tangled web we weave, When first we practise to deceive!" (Sir Walter Scott).


Prof. Pye Chartt
said
0 0

I can't substantiate any of this, but... Apparently, the WikiLeaks documents also reveal that PM Harper actually wears a toupee, Opposition Leader Michael Ignatieff once fashioned women's lingerie at a Liberal caucus meeting, Farley Mowat is secretly schooling Barack Obama in Canadian foreign policy, and George Galloway and Citizenship, Immigration and Multiculturalism Minister Jason Kenney are kissing cousins. The possible TRUTH might just set us all free. (It really bothers me when right-wing fools make light of the "importance" of this earth-shattering information. WikiLeaks, and Julian Assange, are a godsend. This is precisely the kind of stuff that we NEED to know.)


snoopy
said
0 0

Politics is a two-edged sword


tom91
said
0 0

This guy is a champ! The nature of propoganda and damage control is to accuse him of treason, of being a terrorist, etc. To try and shift the spotlight. Yawn. The gullible, that like to wrap themselves in flags, eat it up like the suckers that they are. There is nothing wrong with being anti-American. Get your head out of the sand! Most of the world already is! USA is, saddly, not A-Ok! Maybe 30 years ago, but now its just broken down and only moving forward from it's past momentum, which will eveltually grind to a halt unless they get with the program. Spreading fear and starting wars is not the solution to socio-economic problems.


Intelligent Liberal
said
0 0

I appeciate the TRUTH finally coming out. Why is it that some people would rather be in the dark? Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi was described in two separate cables as "freckeless, vain, and ineffective and whose frequent late nights and penchant for partying hard mean he does not get sufficient rest. German Chancellor Angela Merkel is described as risk-averse, while Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi is described as erratic and in the near constant company of a Ukrainian nurse who was described in one cable as "a voluptuous blonde! What's up with that? Why doesn't Canada have these kind of travelling nurses?


frank
said
0 0

glad to read most of these comments have outed wikileaks, politics and war is dirty so we shouldn't be surprised about the backroom deals and the like,I for one am grateful our big brother lives next door to us, the USA is under attack and this creep Assange will soon find out he shouldn't mess with the yanks business, stay tuned because this will be stopped.


Jon in London ON
said
0 0

I wouldn't say that Obama's adminstration is in the toilet because of these leaks - no, the administration and Obama are just standing at the doorway to the bathroom. As usual, the liberals and progressives will circle the wagons around Obama and blame Bush & Cheney. But man - he has been a BUSY community organizer.


steve in halifax
said
0 0

"Treason" only applies when one betrays one's own nation. Assange is Australian. These acts are more like espionage.


Laurie in Moose Jaw
said
0 0

Assange obviously has no idea where freedom of the press comes from. This guy should be thrown in jail.


Paul ~ Kitchener
said
0 0

This is "TREASON" and this Anti-American should be tried for same. Yes ! We all know there are "Secrets within Politics" - (not all pretty, or favourable , but, they are "SECRET). Many of the comments not politically correct they are truthfull ~ Cut off the head of the Snake ~ You bet, and quick. Kharzi is paranoid ~ You bet, and throw him out fast. We must never lose sight what is "TREASON", and it must be addressed, for the protection of a "Free Democratic Nation". I hope the United States can get this person into the U.S. to stand accountable for his treasonist actions.


C Brown, Markham
said
0 0

One can imagine the witch hunt that must be going on in the US political structure right now. All we get to hear from this is the name calling that goes on the upper political circles of our world. Most of us left name calling behind in grade school.


Anthony
said
0 0

Imagine WikiLeaks Julian Assange going thru US airport customs today. That would be a gamma ray scan for sure :-)


Ian Ottawa
said
0 0

We all live in glass houses and have to take accountability for our words and actions. If You aren't going to take responsibility for said words or actions, then you have a double standard and should not be in a position of trust in the first place. If you can't say it to my face then don't say it at all.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Related Websites

Today's Top Stories

Former Liberian President Charles Taylor waits for the start of his sentencing judgement in the courtroom of the Special Court for Sierra Leone in Leidschendam, near The Hague, Netherlands, Wednesday May 30, 2012.  (AP / Toussaint Kluiters)

Charles Taylor gets 50 years for 'brutal' crimes

More   2 Comments 2    1 Video(s) 1

A police officer removes a package containing a human foot from the Conservative Party headquarters in Ottawa on Tuesday, May 29, 2012. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Police probe body parts in Ottawa, torso in Montreal

More    Comments    3 Video(s) 3

Supporters of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, hold placards and banners bearing images of him before the verdict was given in his extradition case at the Supreme Court in London, Wednesday, May 30, 2012. (AP / Matt Dunham)

Britain's top court backs extradition of WikiLeaks chief

More   4 Comments 4    2 Video(s) 2