Top Stories -   

1
Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper speaks to the media during his closing news conference at APEC meetings in Yokohama, Japan Sunday Nov.14, 2010. (Adrian Wyld / THE CANADIAN PRESS) President Barack Obama, third right, stands with Prime Minister Julia Gillard of Australia, left, President Sebastian Pinera of Chile, second left, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong of Singapore, third left, Prime Minister John Key of New Zealand, second right, and Sultan Hassanal Bolkiah of Brunei, right, as they take part in the Trans-Pacific Partnership meeting at the APEC summit in Yokohama, Japan, Sunday, Nov. 14, 2010. (AP / Charles Dharapak) Prime Minister Stephen Harper speaks to the media during his closing news conference at APEC meetings in Yokohama, Japan Sunday Nov.14, 2010. (Adrian Wyld / THE CANADIAN PRESS) Prime Minister Stephen Harper speaks at APEC meetings in Yokohama, Japan Saturday Nov.13, 2010.

Currency clash will take months to settle: Martin

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV National News: Robert Fife on the summit
Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard objected to Prime Minister Stephen Harper's decision to kill the takeover of Saskatchewan's PotashCorp at the APEC summit in Japan.
CTV News Channel: Ian Lee, Carleton University
A director of the MBA program at Carleton University's Sprott School of Business discusses the G20 Summit. He explains there is still time to resolve the currency issue.
CTV's Question Period: Paul Martin, former PM
Canada's former prime minister discusses the relevance of the G20 Summit meetings. He says while the leaders were unable to make a deal on currencies, they made a good start and will eventually resolve the issue, even if it takes years.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (17) Facebook   

Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper speaks to the media during his closing news conference at APEC meetings in Yokohama, Japan Sunday Nov.14, 2010. (Adrian Wyld / THE CANADIAN PRESS) President Barack Obama, third right, stands with Prime Minister Julia Gillard of Australia, left, President Sebastian Pinera of Chile, second left, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong of Singapore, third left, Prime Minister John Key of New Zealand, second right, and Sultan Hassanal Bolkiah of Brunei, right, as they take part in the Trans-Pacific Partnership meeting at the APEC summit in Yokohama, Japan, Sunday, Nov. 14, 2010. (AP / Charles Dharapak) Prime Minister Stephen Harper speaks to the media during his closing news conference at APEC meetings in Yokohama, Japan Sunday Nov.14, 2010. (Adrian Wyld / THE CANADIAN PRESS) Prime Minister Stephen Harper speaks at APEC meetings in Yokohama, Japan Saturday Nov.13, 2010.

Photos

Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper speaks to the media during his closing news conference at APEC meetings in Yokohama, Japan Sunday Nov.14, 2010. (Adrian Wyld / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

View Larger Image

Date: Sun. Nov. 14 2010 6:12 PM ET

G20 leaders left their meetings in South Korea and Japan without a concrete deal on currency exchange rates, but the issue could take months or years to settle, says former prime minister Paul Martin.

The theme of clashing monetary policies was raised at last week's G20 meeting in Seoul, and again at this weekend's summit of the 21-nation Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) group in the Japanese port city of Yokohama.

Leaders announced Sunday they will avoid increasing barriers to trade and cut back on protectionist policies implemented during the economic crisis in an effort to stimulate economic growth. But they offered no timeline for when a regional free trade zone may be established or when they will uniformly allow for the free movement of exchange rates.

Martin, who helped establish the G20 organization, said overall the leaders "did very well in Korea," particularly on issues such as reforming the International Monetary Fund and focusing efforts on economic development.

But in an interview with CTV's Question Period on Sunday, Martin said leaders were "never going to solve the question of global imbalances at this particular meeting."

"You're dealing with profound structural differences between the United States and China, and in fact between Germany and the rest of the Euro zone," Martin said.

"So I think that expectations were somewhat created that really were never going to be lived up to. But I think in fact they are going to succeed, but it's going to take months, if not years, to deal with this fundamentally."

After the APEC meeting wrapped up Sunday, Japanese Prime Minister Naoto Kan gave the year 2020 as a tentative target for establishing a free-trade zone among Pacific nations.

"We reaffirm our unwavering commitment to achieving free and open trade and investment in the region," the leaders said in their final declaration. "We must take steps to build a foundation for stronger, more sustainable and more balanced growth in the future."

Martin said free trade with Asian countries with growing middle classes that are hungry for North American goods will be important, particularly during a fragile recovery from a global recession.

"I think that these are going to be huge markets and we simply cannot turn our back on them," Martin said. "And in fact, as the American market takes its time coming back, our ability to penetrate these growing markets in the East are very important to us."

The APEC leaders' declaration also reiterated the need to reduce government debt amid the global economic downturn, and leaders also pledged to avoid a full-blown currency war.

Undervalued yuan?

The U.S. and other nations have long contended that China intentionally undervalues its currency, the yuan, which gives Chinese exporters an advantage in overseas markets. Meanwhile, several nations have criticized the U.S. for its decision to print more money to stimulate its faltering economy, which they say has hiked the values of their own currencies and spurred inflation.

China did agree to allow its currency to appreciate, but said that it will happen very slowly over a long period of time. The U.S. also agreed to reduce its deficit, which will also take an unknown period of time.

Martin said China's practice of keeping its currency undervalued is a "very, very serious problem." But on the other hand, its efforts to hike the yuan's value will not happen overnight, he said.

"So what you really have to do is everybody has to be aware of the problem, and they've got to realize that this competitive devaluation that they're talking about is another form of protectionism, and they've said very clearly they know the dangers that lie there," Martin said.

At the conclusion of the weekend APEC summit, Prime Minister Stephen Harper said it failed to produce the "bold" moves he had called for ahead of the meeting.

"The necessity of dealing with medium-term questions of global imbalances and exchange rates -- those do have to be tackled over time," Harper told reporters.

"They don't have to be tackled this month or next month in order to avert any kind of cataclysm."

"It's not a problem we can solve in one meeting," Harper also said.

Chinese President Hu Jintao echoed concerns of other world leaders when he said the economic recovery "is not solid," and is threatened by trade imbalances.

"The employment situation in developed countries is grim, and emerging markets face inflationary pressures and asset price bubbles," he told the other leaders.

Such a large free-trade zone, which would reduce tariffs on products ranging from auto parts to food, would encompass half of global economic production and two-fifths of world trade. Reducing trade barriers gives nations easier access to markets for their products and also makes it easier to invest abroad. While free trade can create jobs, it can also threaten them.

Leaders will continue their discussions when the U.S. hosts the next APEC summit in Honolulu, Hawaii in 2011, while leaders will venture to Vladivostok, Russia in 2012.

With files from The Associated Press and The Canadian Press

Comments are now closed for this story

Number Cruncher
said
0 0

@ Prof Pye Chart - How exactly has Free Trade helped Canada? I realize we have Toyota & Honda plants here paying good wages, but our auto industry was growing well under the Auto Pact, before NAFTA. And, the investment by the Asian plants have been more than offset by job losses from the Detroit 3 here in Canada.NAFTA brought Mexico into the deal and there have been 10's of 1,000's of manufacturing jobs lost to Mexico since. Again, free trade does nothing to protect the middle class of a nation, only corporate interests that are allowed to build elsewhere and then import the products back into Canada sans tariffs. That does wonders for the tax base as people lose jobs and social costs rise.I realize there is more to Canada than manufacturing, but industry is a cornerstone of a nations wealth (look at China's prowess today as a manufacturing behemoth) and we are in a post industrial phase now thanks primarily to having free trade with 3rd world nations. Low wage service jobs don't buy $400,000 homes. And not everyone is a successful entrepreneur. I don't think I'm the one who needs to brush up on Economics, my friend.


lc
said
0 0

Sue@I find it amazing how liberals praise Martin for slaying the deficit by putting a knife the heart of health care and slashing the social safety net. just because he goes under the Liberal banner. News flash ,This is not your dads liberal party.Most are to the right of the Mulroney conservatives when you look at their stance on open border free trade,war and the environment.Trudeau must be turning in the grave not only for the direction the elites have taken the party but also how the grass roots have been so easily deceived!!


DC in AB
said
0 0

Sue: Absolutely correct, if Paul Martin was still our finance minister, he would have for sure been able to fix the US and Europe's economic problems. After all, he is superman, how on earth did he get voted out in 2006? I agree that all Harper did was go into deficit to get a majority with all that stimulus spending, after all, Ignatieff certainly didn't shout, screem and cry for that spending. Neither did Jack Layton. Nope, Harper has no idea how to read a bank statement what with his Master degree in economics, and his following of John Maynard Keynes to the letter during the recession (look it up). Nope I see you're much more knowledgable and intelligent that our PM, what with your clever use of Prorogue Miniter Harper... very whitty sue... very whitty.


Prof. Pye Chartt
said
0 0

@ Number Cruncher: NAFTA is seen by most economic analysts as being quite beneficial to Canada; Canadian companies and, ultimately, Canadians themselves. (Do your homework, if you don't want to take my word for it. Perhaps you should be taking "Economics 101" again, or, finding an online course entitled, "Free Trade 101.")


PBW
said
0 0

AJ from Montreal ". . . heard one rumor that the economies of the world are now thinking of a one-global currency. " That would be a very pleasing thing for conspiracy theorists! Just imagine the fun they can have, the hours spent building this rumor into fact, the ulcers and gray hair produced by willing this rumor into "fact"! Still, if such a rumor keeps people happy. . .


Prof. Pye Chartt
said
0 0

@ Sue: It's politically "convenient" to forget that the Liberals frantically, enthusiastically, and forcefully supported a federal stimulus program, endorsed the Conservative government's "Economic Action Plan" (after some conditional foot-stomping, of course), and, therefore, would have spent tens of billions of dollars if running the parliamentary show. Your whole "deficit" complaint is beyond silly. (Arguably, the Liberals may well have spent MORE money.) Quibble about the dimes and quarters, if you must, but the big picture remains largely unchanged. Most Canadians already understand this, explaining why Iggy is still chasing a dream.


Number Cruncher
said
0 0

Free trade is all the clowns in Ottawa & Washington ever want to talk about. Our nations are nearly broke and still these idiots pursue this path. Who's pulling their strings? Whenever a high wage nation has free trade with a low wage nation, Corporate interests gleefully move production to low wage nations and the high wage nation goes bust. Economics 101.Insanity is when you repeatedly follow the same process expecting different results. Lets get rid of all these treasonous traitors in both Ottawa & Washington.


Sue
said
0 0

If Paul Martin was still our finance minister we wouldn't have this massive deficit that Harper created to try to get a majority. Prorogue minister Harper probably doesn't even understand his personal bank statement, let alone the world economy. I see Mr we won't run a deficit Harper missed the photo opt, I guess they only included those who had something to offer. More money wasted & the same results as the fake lake Gee nothing was accomplished except we blew a billion meeting.


Tim
said
0 0

Wendy said "So, basically, the trips to India, SK, and Japan resulted in.... nothing? Thanks for nothing."Would you rather have Harper stay in Canada and ignore the world community? Then you and the other Liberals whiners will be complaining about Harper hiding from international conferences.


aj from montreal
said
0 0

Free Trade? What free-trade? Are these nations (including Canada, ours) really talking inside closed doors about positive steps to reduce the blow-out in our present global economic state?

I question the motives of these Politicans if they are actually finding solutions or making solutions that make people's lives at risk. Unfortunately, a lot of the conspiracy theroists are now becoming right afterall in predicting this crisis is an engineered hoax! Look at right now what is happening with the G20 meetings, neither the US or China would back down regarding to this currentcy issue. Apparently, I heard one rumor that the economies of the world are now thinking of a one-global currency.


Pip
said
0 0

Although the talks for Pacific Rim free trade have been going on for years, and although there has not, as yet been any firm agreement (apart from continuing to talk about it) the idea has merit. However, I suspect that what is holding back such an agreement is the concept of fair, balanced trade. Free trade does not mean that a nation has the right to dump artificially cheap goods on other nations and buy little to nothing in return. Trade means the action of buying and selling goods and services, and should be a two-way street when it comes to trade between nations. If a nation wants to sell $X million of goods to Canada, then that nation must be willing to buy at least 60% of that value from Canada, the differential being an allowance for a developing nation. However, when a nation is fully industrialized, there should be an equality, in other words, fair trade. I would have no problems with the US imposing tariffs on Chinese goods, considering the vast imbalance of trade, and the sacrifice in jobs exported to China; the other solution is for China to buy far more US goods to bring about a better balance - something they seem singularly unwilling to do.


BCDarr
said
0 0

On the plus side, our Prime Joke didn't throw another 2 Billion dollars of our money away at this one. Hope he and his family had another nice vacation.Big thanks to the conservatives for making the sponsorship scandal look like effective money management.


ChJCrwthr
said
0 0

The world should be more self reliant - if protectionism exists in the pacific rim what's wrong with North America? If Asia doesn't like the fact that the U.S. prints money to spur it's own economy after losing millions of jobs due to globalization it's time to say no to globalization.


Rick in NB, Ste Marie
said
0 0

How long are we going to bankroll this party on wheels. They all agree to disagree so they can go to the next tax payer backed freebee, where they recieve expensive gifts, lodging, gourmet meals and attend gala events. They are definitely on a slow and steady course to nowhere,


danR
said
0 0

Mr. fiscal tightwad Harper must be pleased the Korean people are more apathetic towards these money-wasting meetings than Canadians or Europeans. But after this results-gauged fiasco they really should think about video-conferencing from now on, and send the savings to Haiti or some place where the money could be USED.


Prof. Pye Chartt
said
0 0

Oh, well, it was a "bust." (Did anyone expect that the global trade equation was going to be re-written by the close of the summit?) Undoubtedly, we'll be educated as to it being all our PM's fault. Moreover, America will be pilloried for its economically defensive stance (printing money), and China will be foolishly forgiven for continuing to stick it to its Western customers (intentionally undervaluing its currency). Though APEC has 21 member-nations, one imagines that PM Harper's absence from CTV's enclosed photo will stir some juicy negative comments.


Wendy
said
0 0

So, basically, the trips to India, SK, and Japan resulted in.... nothing? Thanks for nothing.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Top Stories

Former Liberian President Charles Taylor waits for the start of his sentencing judgement in the courtroom of the Special Court for Sierra Leone in Leidschendam, near The Hague, Netherlands, Wednesday May 30, 2012.  (AP / Toussaint Kluiters)

Charles Taylor gets 50 years for 'brutal' crimes

More   2 Comments 2    1 Video(s) 1

A police officer removes a package containing a human foot from the Conservative Party headquarters in Ottawa on Tuesday, May 29, 2012. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Police probe body parts in Ottawa, torso in Montreal

More    Comments    3 Video(s) 3

Supporters of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, hold placards and banners bearing images of him before the verdict was given in his extradition case at the Supreme Court in London, Wednesday, May 30, 2012. (AP / Matt Dunham)

Britain's top court backs extradition of WikiLeaks chief

More   4 Comments 4    2 Video(s) 2