Top Stories -   

1

Cash-strapped Liberals turn to pros to raise money

Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff points as he speaks to a group of students during a open mic session at Richmond Secondary School in Richmond, B.C. Friday, Nov 12, 2010. (Jonathan Hayward / THE CANADIAN PRESS) Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff delivers a speech on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Monday, Nov. 8, 2010. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS)
Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff points as he speaks to a group of students during a open mic session at Richmond Secondary School in Richmond, B.C. Friday, Nov 12, 2010. (Jonathan Hayward / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

View Larger Image

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (35) Facebook   

Date: Friday Nov. 12, 2010 5:34 PM ET

OTTAWA — The federal Liberal party has hired a team of professional fundraisers in a bid to catch up with the Conservative money machine.

The team has its work cut out for it.

So far this year, the Tories have raised almost three times as much money as the Liberals -- $12.1 million versus $4.4 million, according to quarterly financial statements filed with Elections Canada.

Moreover, the Liberal take is down more than $3 million compared with the same period last year, when the party finally seemed to be making some progress closing the fundraising gap with the ruling Conservatives.

By comparison, the Tory haul is down only slightly and the NDP, which has raked in $2.7 million so far this year, is actually up slightly.

Liberal party president Alf Apps acknowledges the plunge in donations is at least partly a result of the party's slide in opinion polls over the last year.

"Fundraising is a reflection of where you sit in the polls and for the first half of the year last year we were ahead in the polls. Now we're a little bit behind," Apps said in an interview.

In addition, he said 2009 was an exceptional year, with a national convention, the installation of a new leader and the threat of a fall election combining to fuel a spike in donations that could not be duplicated this year.

Party insiders also say this year's fundraising efforts suffered from the abrupt departure of Rocco Rossi last December. Rossi, an innovative and effective fundraiser, quit as national director of the party to make an ill-fated bid for the mayoralty in Toronto.

He was credited with helping the Liberals raise more money in the first half of 2009 than they did in all of 2008.

Still, Apps said the dismal results so far this year were expected. That's because the party is in the midst of making the transition to a new fundraising model aimed at identifying hundreds of thousands of supporters who can be tapped for regular, small contributions month after month, year after year.

At the heart of the new model is a new, long-awaited national database that will identify potential donors and the issues that are most likely to motivate them to give money.

As part of the transition, the party has set up a separate fundraising arm, the Liberal Fund, which has hired professional fundraisers to put the finishing touches on the database and to craft targeted pitches to potential donors based on their "issue affiliation."

"It is a big project of building right now. We hope to see the results of it next year," Apps said.

"We not at all panicking. ... We just have a long way to go to catch up."

The Liberal party has been struggling to raise money since 2004, when political financing reforms went into effect. The reforms banned corporate donations and severely limited the amount individuals can contribute to $5,000 a year. The Harper government further restricted annual individual donations to $1,000 in 2006.

Having traditionally relied heavily on corporate cash and big donations from the wealthy elite, the Liberal party has been slow to adjust to the broadbased, popular fundraising approach demanded by the new rules of the game.

By contrast, the Tories have prospered under the new regime. Apps said that's because the Conservatives inherited a grassroots fundraising model used by one of its predecessor parties, the Reform Party.

He said the Tories also expanded and refined their database by aggressively using 10-percenters -- taxpayer-funded pamphlets sent by MPs -- to identify potential donors and their issue affiliation. MPs were banned earlier this year from sending 10-percenters to households outside their own ridings.

"They were equipped for popular fundraising. We weren't," Apps said.

"And there's a long lead time for building it up."

Comments are now closed for this story

Lorne
said

One has to really ask just how many ties Harper's Conservatives have with the National Citizens Coalition's fund raising scheme. The NCC was notorious for raising funds to fight legal battles against Liberal governments of the past and since Harper resided as president of the lobby group (mainly pro american corps), would have offered much in the way of resources both financial or otherwise to the Conservative parties fund raising efforts. One should also ask just how much a church can donate anonymously to federal parties and how many churches across Canada donate to the Harper party (not to mention other organizations such as the NCC), made possible through a court challenge by Harper to existing election laws while Harper was president of the NCC. The answers will likely surprise Conservatives themselves, never mind the rest of us.


Raj
said

Harper has a great base, we the base don't rely on huge moneys from corporations.I dont think the libs will be able to get their groundswell to pony up much more than what they have.Get rid of iggy, then, maybe.Only maybe.


Richard L. Provencher
said

I do not believe any party should receive tax dollars for every vote garnered during an election. The grassroots of the party should be the major contributors. Then that would serve notice on the Block/BLOC party to earn their own funds.


Dave
said

When the connies need a cash injection they up bring the long gun registry & all the gun nuts send money, it's too bad for the liberals who don't have any nut cases that will send money for stupid issues.


Bill in Calgary
said

The Conservatives should have been first to suggest that the Liberals hire a team of professional fundraisers. Then Squiggy would have come out swinging against it, and we would be rid of them forever. No funds - no Liberal party. It works for me.


peter in mb
said

The liberals are having more then just money problems their having integrity problems (they dont have any). could not be happening to a more deserving bunch of people.


Sam C
said

"We not at all panicking. ... We just have a long way to go to catch up." Which I will interpret as an affirmation that the Liberals will not try to force an election any time soon.


Joe M
said

Liberal Message to CanadaWe can't manage our own party finances, but please vote us in to manage the country.NOT!


MARG MM
said

The Liberals have always catered to the big Corporations, hence they received the majority of their funds from them.When Corporations became restricted in the amount they could donate, the Liberals suffered. The Liberals do not care about ordinary Canadians, so why would ordinary Canadians donate to their cause?


Doug # BC
said

I would add to the sentiment expressed in the post by "Dano",that to have people donate money you have to A) Have polices that people can vote FOR. B) Present yourself as an honest party that can be trusted C) Have a leader who can speak honestly to those policies while still assuring voters that the entire party is united behnd those policies. Look folks.The Conservatives get the vast majority of their money from people.Liberals have always relied on donations from big business corparations AND special interest groups.Groups which rarely represent the views of ordinary citznes. And finally,I listened to Mr.Ignatieff try to answer questions from university students in Vancouver this morning.Really,money sent to support that knid of wishy-washy,elitist mentality is not money well spent.You get donations when people decide to support what you stand FOR.In casses where you are afraid to stand FOR anything,it should come as no surprise when the donation dry up. THe Liberals problem is clear.In trying to be all things to all people,they have boxed themselves inot a corner in which they stand FOR nothing, but stand only AGAINST whatever the other guy wants. The remind me of a sports team that is not strong enough to win,but hope they get a victory by having the other team not show up at all.


Can I Borrow a Dime
said

It's obvious if they can't look after their own house, they can't look after a country. What would they do when they couldn't fund programs? Raise our taxes? Oops!!


Prof. Pye Chartt
said

@ Reece: Rather goofy comment...given that both parties are on an equal playing field, especially after corporate donations were banned in 2004. The article makes clear that the absence of corporate money has hurt the LIBERALS most of all. Perhaps I need to spell it out for you: the financial welfare of the LIBERALS has been most dependent upon corporate generosity. Your silly argumentative stereotype is all wet, my friend. The game is driven by "grassroots" money, not that from companies. (P.S. Ever heard of "limousine liberals"? That ties to another myth about conservatives.)


Bob,Calgary
said

The Federal Liberals have become essentially a party of English Montreal, Toronto and the Maritimes. The English Montrealers support the Liberals because, for some strange reason, they see the Libs as standing up for minority rights in Quebec. The Maritimes support the party because they have come to rely on handouts from the rest of the country and they see the Libs as the best chance for continuing pork Toronto supports the Libs because they somehow see the party as more "enlightened" than those nasty right wing conservatives and Torontonians like to see themselves as more enlightened than the rest of us . This dynamic is changing however as redistribution gives more seats to areas of non committed Liberal support. While I do not see Harper as achieving a majority because of the Quebec penchant to vote Bloc and the bleeding of votes to the Greens there is absolutely no chance of the Liberals ever forming a government again unless Harper were to do something so patently stupid that his support fell away. And Harper is anything but stupid.


Gabriel Dumont
said

And if the Liberals win maybe they should hire an outside political firm to run the government as they don't seem to have any ideas of their own. Mr. Harper and his team seem to be doing fine.


Fred
said

If the liberals get back in power again they're just go back to their old fundraising tactic of holding the west up by thier feet and shaking them until all of the money comes out.


Paul ~ Kitchener
said

LIBERALS ~ BROKE The Liberal party is broke financially, policy wise, & defunct of leadership.This is the only party that if they looked into the "Crystalo Ball" would only see an "Empty Void" !This void is the centre mantle of the present Liberal party. Liberals better pray, that soon they get "NEW FOCUS ~ NEW LEADERSHIP & a SOLID PLATFORM. As of today they couldn't win free tickets to Cineplex. Liberals run up the "WHITE FLAG" and let our present responsible government continue on their road to majority. The first thing the liberal party could do, would be, to "Buy a One Way Ticket on VIA Rail back to the U.S. for the teacher "!


Gord. Robson, Nova Scotia
said

Could it be Canadians do not trust the Liberals?Maybe it is the Liberals reportedly wanting/planning to raise the amount Canadians pay in income tax and or cutting services like health care if they are elected? I wonder?I know as a senior I sure do not trust them or any of their "promises" !


Robert LaGarde
said

They could run a bingo and raffle off Sponsorshop posters.


john messom
said

the only way the liberals party will raise any money is by starting at the top and that is by getting ridding of their leader mr ingatieff the liberals are not listen to canadian and that is that canadian do not like and trust this man so liberals do the right thing send this man back to the us where he came from and then found the right person for the leader and i am not talking about bob rae eighter he put ontario in the hole and he would put canada in a mess


Pedro
said

The irony here is that Harper is standing for the interests of the old money, not for the men and women on the street. However, it is the Liberals who are portrayed as the elite. True the Liberals had been in power for 13 years (about) and were sunk by the sponsorship scandal. But people forget and forgive Mulroney for introducing the GST, the Meech Lake debacle and bundles of cash stuffed into brown envelopes. As bad as the sponsorship scandal was, the motive was a misguided attempt to maintain national unity in a post Meech Lake era. All said, the Liberals and the NDP probably best represents the interests of the men and women on the street, yet it is these same people who seem to be funding Harper. Go figure.


Prof Sine Curve
said

The statement "Having traditionally relied heavily on corporate cash and big donations from the wealthy elite, the Liberal party has been slow to adjust to the broadbased, popular fundraising approach demanded by the new rules of the game. " says a lot. ---- So, Liberals weren't really a party for mainstream Canadians. Looks like they had a small number of rich supporters who financed them and then received generous payback from we the taxpayer once the Libs got re-elected. And all the while, Libs were falsely accusing Conservatives of that.


Acroyear
said

I've said before I don't like Harper, but I *can* pretty much guess what he's going to do about any given issue. He *is* at least a conservative...period. From Dion the Ditz to Iggy and Nowhere Man... the party I once would have voted for without hesitation has no real leadership. They have had a man who should have been either NDP or Socialist Party of Canada, but was in now way a solid centrist Liberal, then went to this guy...who just does not resonate with anyone. Most grass roots Liberals might have hated Dion, but at least he led...right off a cliff...but he did lead.


Ivan
said

Ah, the usual anti-Iggy trolls are out in force once again. The same posts by the same posters every time he's mentioned.


al
said

Cash strapped LiberalsAHH!! Isn't that a shame!! Where is all the money they stole from Alberta with their beloved National Energy Program.How did Iggy get a free trip all across Canada -- you'd think some foresight would of prevailed before that huge expense, because I'll bet he didn't stay at Super 8 or Best Western.


bryan fraser owen sound
said

Iam with the person that stated "I would never donate to a politicial party that stole from the taxpayers(Adscam)"Also the Liberals dont seem to have a problem with the money they collect from the Votes.Conservatives flushed them & the Ndp out on that issue.


CMQ
said

It is very difficult to have a solid financial contribution base when the leader of the party has no solid strategy or policy base. Who is going to support a guy who only resides in one "camp" as long as the opinion polls show that is the popular view at the time. People get elected not because all their ideas are agreed with, people get elected because they have ideas they are willing to hold to whether it leads to being elected or not. That is being respectable and trustworthy not this constant flip flop. Who is going to invest in someone who can't make up their mind what they stand for. Wait and see politics are bankrupt just like your political cash flow seems to be!!!!


J
said

"Professional" fundraisers are not going to be the remedy. A fresh vision, strong leadership, realistic policies will fix the Liberals' fundraising problems. Unfortunately, they have no new ideas. What exactly do they stand for? Most Canadians don't know -- so why would they donate? It's not an issue about fundraisers; it's about Ignatieff's weak and incompetent leadership.


David
said

"Having traditionally relied heavily on corporate cash and big donations from the wealthy elite...."all of that Liberal pocket stuffing at the taxpayer expense when Chretien was in office and they can't raise decent funds from their wealthy elitist friends - go figure.


Reece
said

Well, if they were pro socialist-corporation rather than a socialist-people party they wouldnt have to go begging would they? Socialism is for the corporations and was never intended to have average people looking for hand-outs, bail-outs or "stimulous" - if I sought stimulous spending for my mistakes and greed I'd be accused of being a Maoist, but if I were a corporation that would be entirely different. The key is not to offend the corporations and if you can do that, you wouldnt have money problems. To steal a famous quote from the Americans "I govt of the people, by the people, for the corporations" - or something like that. Sounds about right.


John Lethbridge
said

It just seems so ironic that it was the Liberals had been relying on big corporate donations to fund their campaigns. For all the flack that the conservatives take on catering only to big rich oil companies, etc., they continue to collect a lot of support from regular working class people who appreciate a government that works for them. It's one thing to offer your political support on blogs like these, an other to put your money where your mouth is.Go Harper.


Jim McB
said

Apps is a typical Liberal, the CPC got the job done so he takes a cheap shot saying they cheated with the 10 percenters. Liberals far too often blame their failures on the success of others.Missing in the article is the party faithful, who give what we can when we can because we believe in the direction of the government. The Liberals have no direction and keep falling back on failed "handout" policies popular in Ontario and Quebec. When an elction comes they will be decimated and likely the Dippers will become the Official Opposition! No policy, no direction, no leader = no chance!


Dano
said

No Leader , No money


John Lethbridge
said

You liberals aren't raising money because your leader is out of touch and your own people won't support him. The conservatives have a proven leader who is getting the job done, and the cardholders are standing behind him.[X] Harper


Michael (Ottawa)
said

It will take more than a pro fundraiser to get me to contribute to a political party that stole from me as a taxpayer while in office. The Liberals do not represent my interests well and I'm sorry but they had their opportunity and blew it looking after their friends. The McGuinty Liberals are also looking after their friends too so this appears to be a pattern in the way Liberals handle taxpayers money never mind their policy platform is non existent for which to decide if I would like to support them on that basis.


CPO
said

While it helps, you do not need a huge war chest to run an campaign. You just need issues that resonate with CDNs.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Top Stories

Former Liberian President Charles Taylor waits for the start of his sentencing judgement in the courtroom of the Special Court for Sierra Leone in Leidschendam, near The Hague, Netherlands, Wednesday May 30, 2012.  (AP / Toussaint Kluiters)

Charles Taylor gets 50 years for 'brutal' crimes

More   2 Comments 2    1 Video(s) 1

A police officer removes a package containing a human foot from the Conservative Party headquarters in Ottawa on Tuesday, May 29, 2012. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Police probe body parts in Ottawa, torso in Montreal

More    Comments    3 Video(s) 3

Supporters of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, hold placards and banners bearing images of him before the verdict was given in his extradition case at the Supreme Court in London, Wednesday, May 30, 2012. (AP / Matt Dunham)

Britain's top court backs extradition of WikiLeaks chief

More   4 Comments 4    2 Video(s) 2