Top Stories -   

1

Google mapped more than addresses: privacy czar

Google
Google

View Larger Image

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (4) Facebook   

Date: Tuesday Oct. 19, 2010 3:16 PM ET

OTTAWA — Millions of Canadians search the web every day, but the country's privacy commissioner says their favourite search engine was doing too much research into them.

Jennifer Stoddart says Google broke Canadian privacy laws when it accidentally collected personal information from unsecured wireless networks while putting together its Street View mapping service.

An investigation by Stoddart's office found complete emails, addresses, usernames and passwords. Even a list that provided the names of people suffering from certain medical conditions was collected.

"This incident was a serious violation of Canadians' privacy rights," she said in a statement.

Thousands of Canadians were likely affected, Stoddart said, by what amounted to a careless error on the part of an engineer.

According to Stoddart's investigation, the code the engineer had written to map wireless Internet signals also allowed for the capture of communications over unencrypted networks, but he never submitted it for review to Google's lawyers so no one was aware of the potential for problems.

Even when a German data collector first raised concerns about the Wi-Fi mapping earlier this year, Google denied it was collecting anything other than what was publicly available.

But upon a review, Google staff realized their cars were capturing much more than the flower pots in front of people's homes.

In an interview, Stoddart said her team was taken aback by the extent of the information.

"We had heard there was no personal information collected, we had heard that it would just be snippets, it would unintelligible, and in fact it was very intelligible," she said.

"There was a lot of personal information, some very sensitive personal information, and it wasn't that hard for them to get at it, so Google is sitting on a mound of personal information of a highly identifiable kind."

In its response to Stoddart's findings, the company said it had no intention to use the data and would keep it safe until all investigations are complete, then delete it.

Google did not immediately respond to a request for an interview.

After the privacy concerns were first raised, the company halted the roll out of Street View mapping cars in Ireland, Norway, South Africa and Sweden until it could delete the offending software.

"We recognize that serious mistakes were made in the collection of Wi-Fi payload data, and we have worked to quickly rectify them," the company said at the time.

"However we also believe that Street View is a great product for users, whether people want to find a hotel, check out a potential new home or find a restaurant."

While Stoddart said she believes the data is secure, she isn't as confident in Google's overall approach to privacy.

"This is basically the third time in sixth months that there's been a Google mix-up," she said.

"In the race to get ahead with new products, there is not sufficient attention paid to the protection of personal information."

In April, Stoddart led a group of 10 privacy regulators who wrote to Google concerned about its approach to privacy, especially in the wake of its controversial "Buzz" project, a social network built out of people's email address books.

They were also worried about the general privacy implications of Street View, which allows users to get crystal-clear pictures of homes and, in some cases, people's faces and licence plates.

Stoddart said Google needed clearer controls around new product launches as well as enhanced privacy training.

"They are leaping before they look," said Stoddart.

"They are not taking it seriously and, you know, I think that's why increasingly regulators are stepping up the tone and we're working together."

On Monday, Spanish data regulators announced they were filing a lawsuit against Google for the Wi-Fi mapping incident and seeking millions in fines.

Comments are now closed for this story

Pam
said

AND were all the individuals whose personal information was collected informed by the proper authorities of this breach of privacy?????


Sam C
said

It is time that people took responsibility for keeping their own personal information secure, and recognize that the average home Wi-Fi network is NOT secure.


CA in eastern Ontario
said

Yes, but will they be fined or another form of penalty? It is fine to say they did this and are holding the information, which they should be destroying if possible. BUT, the question is what penalty will they receive and will it be enough to warrant better practises?


Joe Canadian
said

Keep it safe? You mean mine the hell out of it for whatever marketing information they can get. They should immediately destroy the data.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Top Stories

Former Liberian President Charles Taylor waits for the start of his sentencing judgement in the courtroom of the Special Court for Sierra Leone in Leidschendam, near The Hague, Netherlands, Wednesday May 30, 2012.  (AP / Toussaint Kluiters)

Charles Taylor gets 50 years for 'brutal' crimes

More   2 Comments 2    1 Video(s) 1

A police officer removes a package containing a human foot from the Conservative Party headquarters in Ottawa on Tuesday, May 29, 2012. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Police probe body parts in Ottawa, torso in Montreal

More    Comments    3 Video(s) 3

Supporters of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, hold placards and banners bearing images of him before the verdict was given in his extradition case at the Supreme Court in London, Wednesday, May 30, 2012. (AP / Matt Dunham)

Britain's top court backs extradition of WikiLeaks chief

More   4 Comments 4    2 Video(s) 2