Top Stories -   

1
A person participates in an American Red Cross CPR training in Washington in this Sept. 15, 2006 file photo. (AP / Haraz N. Ghanbari) CPR switch: Chest presses first, then breaths

CPR switch: Chest presses first, then breaths

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV National News: Avis Favaro on the changes
The Canadian Heart Association has issued simpler guidelines on how to assist a person in cardiac arrest. The changes were made to make it easier and faster to save lives, with or without proper CPR training.
CTV News Channel: Rob Skelly, instructor
An instructor and trainer with St. John's Ambulance says they will be changing their protocol plans but the changes will happen over a period of time. He says the new protocols are set to simplify things and make saving a life more effective.
CTV Winnipeg: Jeremy Hunka on CPR guidelines
One of the most basic lifesaving methods is set to change. New guidelines for CPR has been announce and it is the first major changes in 50 years. The new guidelines are a lot easier and also will help save about 30 seconds of time to save a life.
CTV Southwestern Ontario: Janine Grespan reports
The Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada has issued new guidelines that say chest compressions should come first and will help to save lives. The new order for CPR has been rearranged to help more blood reach the brain faster.
CTV News Channel: Dr. Andrew Travers explains
A doctor with the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada explains why his group and others have updated the guidelines for CPR saying after calling 911 the next step is to start compressing the victim's chest hard and fast, because wasting time with the other steps first can mean the difference between life and death.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (24) Facebook   

A person participates in an American Red Cross CPR training in Washington in this Sept. 15, 2006 file photo. (AP / Haraz N. Ghanbari) CPR switch: Chest presses first, then breaths

Photos

A person participates in an American Red Cross CPR training in Washington in this Sept. 15, 2006 file photo. (AP / Haraz N. Ghanbari)

View Larger Image

Date: Mon. Oct. 18 2010 2:31 PM ET

The alphabet mantra of CPR is changing.

Instead of performing the A-B-C checks first -- airway, breaths, circulation -- new guidelines out Monday call for chest compressions to come first.

The guidelines, released by the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada and other international heart groups, call for bystanders to first call 911 when they come across someone who appears to have gone into cardiac arrest.

The next step is to start compressing the victim's chest hard and fast.

Earlier guidelines called for looking, listening and feeling for normal breathing before starting CPR, then checking that the airway was clear and then giving quick breaths into the victim through mouth-to-mouth respiration.

Now, compressions should be started immediately on anyone who is unresponsive and not breathing normally, because taking the time to perform the other steps first can mean the difference between life and death, the guidelines advise.

Many bystanders balked or panicked about having to perform those preparatory steps. So in recent years, heart groups began recommending that untrained bystanders should simply start hands-only CPR until paramedics arrive or a defibrillator is used to restore a normal heart beat.

These newest guidelines say everyone -- from professionals to bystanders -- who use standard CPR should begin first with chest compressions.

"We've switched the components of CPR, they are all very important . . . but the sequence of them has changed, we now teach C-A-B, compressions first, then airway, then breathing," Dr. Andrew Travers, chair of the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada's policy advisory committee on resuscitation and one of the co-authors of the guidelines, told CTV News Channel Monday.

The guidelines stress that even those who have never taken a CPR course can do chest compressions.

"The best evidence right now says if you are not trained in CPR . . . if you come across someone who is in cardiac arrest, you should call 911, ask for a defibrillator, and push hard and fast in the centre of the patient's chest," Dr. Travers said.

The key is to do them fast, at a rate of at least 100 compressions per minute – about the same tempo as the Bee Gees' song "Stayin' Alive".

It's also important to do the compression firmly, the guidelines stress, so that there is complete recoil when the hands lift off the chest between compressions. The adult sternum should be depressed at least five centimetres. For infants, it should be about four centimetres.

"Think about moving the heel of your hands up and down about two inches into the chest - or the height of your pinky finger," Dr. Travers said in an earlier news release.

For those who are trained in CPR, the new guidelines still call for 30 compressions, then opening the victim's airway and delivering two breaths.

These are the first updates to the guidelines in Canada in five years, and experts from 29 countries contributed to them. The 356 authors took into account research about the reluctance of some bystanders to do mouth-to-mouth resuscitation.

A national survey conducted Sept. 2-10 by Environics for the Heart and Stroke Foundation that polled more than 2,000 people found 62 per cent of respondents had taken a CPR course, but it was more than a year ago for three-quarters of them.

Most worryingly, only 40 per cent of those who had taken a CPR class said that nothing would prevent them from trying to revive a person.

A full 15 per cent said they had a lack of confidence in their skills and training, while eight per cent saying they'd prefer to wait for qualified help to arrive; seven per cent mentioned fears of contracting a disease.

"You can't hurt someone if they don't live to see another day, and the reality is . . . the actual number of incidents of injury (from doing proper CPR) is very, very low," Dr. Travers said. "The benefit of doing chest compressions far outweighs any risk associated with it."

The guidelines also take into account the fact that in the first few minutes of a cardiac arrest, victims still have oxygen remaining in their lungs and bloodstream. So starting CPR with chest compressions can pump that blood to the victim's brain and heart sooner.

Research has shown that rescuers who started CPR with opening the airway took 30 critical seconds longer to begin chest compressions than rescuers who began CPR with chest compressions.

The odds of surviving a heart attack (cardiac arrest) are almost four times greater if someone performs CPR right away. When CPR is combined with an Automated External Defibrillator (AED), survival rates soar to 50 per cent or higher, according to the Heart and Stroke Foundation.

Without CPR and defibrillation, fewer than five per cent of people who have a cardiac arrest outside of a hospital survive.

First aid and CPR service provider, St. John Ambulance Canada, said Monday that it supports the new guidelines and will continue to teach all aspects of CPR in its classes.

"It is important to note that if you have had CPR training, the skills you were taught are still okay to use and by immediately beginning CPR you can make a valuable difference in helping to save a life," the organization said in a news release.

Comments are now closed for this story

T in AB
said

Instructor Chris - one quick note if you re-read the article: "The guidelines, released by the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada and other international heart groups..." This IS a Canadian approved standard, not just American. The Red Cross is not the authority - The Heart and Stroke Foundation is, so the Red Cross should be converting ASAP. If someone read your statement they might get the impression it is not an approved Canadian standard, and it clearly is.


robin hood
said

CPR Canadian Pacific Railroad huh, problems?


T in AB
said

Will - Compressions are far more valuable than respirations... and really, easier. The odds of you getting a stranger to stick their mouth on someone else's is low - but compressions is low risk and easy. Things advance in the medical world daily, as we learn more about the body, makes sense to me to keep refining this. CPR isn't designed to resuscitate someone, it's there to keep them going until a medic shows up to provide defib, and compressions is the key.The reality is, breathing for someone doesn't circulate the oxygen in the blood - so it's totally useless without compressions. However, your blood contains enough oxygen that can be used by the body even without the breath, so compressions can keep a person 'revivable'This is something that has been floating around for a couple of years while they tested. I'm all for them finding better way, and sharing it with the public.


robin hood
said

Why are you back with the same story you posted a couple of weeks ago? Granted the information has changed, you last reported we were to omit addressing a blocked airwave completely—going straight to chest compressions. Now you’re reporting we’re to do a revised order of c-a-b (spells cab, CAP) as opposed to a-b-c originally. Can't you get it straight? Only a doctor can diagnose, and frankly there’s not that many that are any good at diagnosing and since I don't carry a doctor in my back pocket to play out their guess work how am I to know the difference when a person presents lying unconscious is in fact due to a cardiac arrest or a complete blocked air wave, without checking! OR are you actually peering into your crystal ball and expecting an onslaught of “cardiac arrest unconscious people”, scary! Is it the salt? Maybe the Heart and Stroke Foundation should have a meeting with their food and drug counterparts. I say yes, clean up your act! BEE GEES I love ‘em then and now. Hi Robin, Berry, Maurice, how are ya? I can’t imagine doing CPR to the beat of “Staying alive” I SEE STALIN! Who in their right mind wants to keep that bastard ticking.


Albertan
said

I actually recently read a story out of Texas where after reviewing several thousand emergencies the state was planning to altogether drop the breathing part. They found that CPR with breathing and chest compressions only had a 8% success rate while chest compressions by themselves had a 11% success rate. They also found that random individuals were almost 2X more likely to assist an individual if only chest compressions were required.They indicated the only truly useful time to use the breathing was on drowning cases and drug overdose situations.Thought I would share as it was quite interesting.


Instructor Chris
said

We must remember 1 very big point about this artical, it refers to the AMERICAN RED CROSS, not the Canadian Red Cross. At this point the CRC does not stand behind that, and until further told we should do what we were originally trained... For a non-trained person they should stick to what they know, call EMS, do the best they can until someone who is trained can help. For a trained person follow the steps to CPR as taught.


mining guy Jim
said

Most importantly...go and learn it. Make the time and do it. It might be your Dad or Mom, maybe your Wife or Husband, or maybe some complete stranger on the sidewalk who will later be a good friend. Do it. As a mining man, I have medical certs up the wazoo and I'm not even on the rescue team. We recently had a choking event happen at home with our 2 year old daughter which opened my eyes. I cleared the issue up in seconds, the plug came out like a bullet, but my assumption that everyone around me knew at least something about first aid was complely false. I have since sent our entire extended family, adults and adolescents, off for introductory first aid, CPR and a day with a Paediatrician to discuss "around the home infant and toddler care." You should too, one day it may be me lying on the floor and I hope that somebody nearby knows CPR!!


Angie
said

As a First Aid instructor it is absolutely vital that I teach my students the best possible skills. One of the things I tell them is to start compressions as soon as possible within 10 sec. maximum. Compressions alone are better than nothing and any bystander can do them even if the sternum or ribs are broken. You must remember that even with compressions alone the casualty will get some air into the body. The critical part is to keep the heart artificially going and to try and restart it a.s.a.p. Some countries are already doing compressions only and have a very high success rate. In my opinion this shows to be a very good change.


Alyx Crawford
said

DW - just to add to your comment, the compressions compress and expand the lungs and DO draw oxygen, although it is more like hyperventilation.


Johnny
said

" ... Every 3 to 5 years, they revamp CPR into a "new & improved" version. ..."

It's actually more frequent than that ... I do my refresher annually and a complete retraining every 2 years. With each re-certification, the procedure has changed.

Although it's important to learn the correct, currently recommended method, the short answer is don't worry about it if you find yourself needing to render emergency aid. Just go with what you remember and get on the casualty. NOW.


Jenna (Edmonton)
said

Why are people complaining that they are implementing a new and improved way of saving lives?
Yes they may change it every 3-5yrs, but that means we are learning a safer and more effective way to perform CPR.



Shawn
said

Interesting to see this story on the same day that KFC releases their Double Down sandwich.


Kel
said

One might need CPR after eating one of those new sandwitches from KFC...


Paul
said

I think we need to train people better. In BC they have three levels of occupational first aid qualification. The level 3, in my opinion should be thought in every highschool as a mandatory course. They should also throw in the AED course too.


JB in Alberta
said

I would be concerned about first determining lack of a pulse. Perhaps it's been too long since I took my course, but I seem to recall that if, in one's eagerness to initiate CPR, one neglects to check for a pulse, or misses finding one, you can actually do serious damage i.e. send a beating heart out of rhythm. I think it's sometimes more difficult for the untrained to find a pulse than people realize. Am I right, or is this no longer considered important?


Ian
said

Will, the science and research, as was said, is continually improving. There was a time when we thought the breathing was most important, now we know that compressions take precedence. The switch in 2005 from 15 compressions to 2 breaths to 30:2 was because it was found that an adequate blood pressure is built around 12 compressions, which would then immediately drop to 0 once the 2 breaths were administered. 30:2 gives the victim a much improved chance by holding that pressure longer. Even compression-only CPR will help, the key is getting on the chest as quickly as possible, no questions asked.


Prof. Pye Chartt
said

My personal, customized application of "C.P.R." was crafted from watching old Hollywood movies. You drop to your knees, grip the person's shirt with both hands, and shake them as hard as possible while screaming in panic and distress, "Don't You Dare Die On Me, Johnny!" Often you must also slap the person, to bring them around. (Even a cup of cold water helps.) When they finally come to, cradle them in desperate relief, and then immediately begin lighting a cigarette, so that they can best enjoy the first moments of their glorious survival. I've never had the opportunity to do this yet, and save a life, but, look forward to the indescribable satisfaction. (God forbid; however, may you be the lucky recipient of my "proven" technique one day, dear comment reader.)


Eugene
said

For those of you that say huh or how can this be go read a physiology textbook. What is important is that the brain gets oxygen. The blood carries more oxygen than the body needs in one whole circulation of the body. So chest compressions effectively move the blood better whereas breathing slows it down and doesn't offer a benefit of oxygen to needy areas. Breaths are only necessary after a long time......even that is in dispute as some states have started doing 50 compressions first or 100.....and IT IS ALWAYS better to do something than nothing. Chest compressions alone can save lives so if you don't want to touch lips with someone doing that could save their life.


Pip
said

Don't just sit or stand there jawing - DO IT. As long as you do the job, there is a chance of saving a life. If you do nothing, you ensure that death occurs.


DW
said

It's about time as they have been talking about this for awhile. For those naysayers, check out the statistics first. In the states where they have moved to compression only CPR survival has doubled...still not great but it's at least in the double digits precentage wise now. The reason for this is because chest compressions are MORE important than respirations to maintain life and research has proven this. This is because the purpose of chest compressions is to move blood from the heart to the brain. As well, chest compressions will not cause damage to a blocked airway...think about it...chest compressions is how you clear a blocked airway in an obese person, a pregnant lady, or an unconscious person. Don't get me wrong oxygen will be needed eventually for the body's cells to survive, but your body can live longer without oxygen then not getting blood to the brain. Good job on finally changing the recommendations as everyone in emergency medicine has been hearing about this for too long!


David J
said

@Will... 7% is better than ZERO. @Island girl... yes, it may pander to the squeamish, but there is research to back up effectiveness of these changes. When I taught CPR, I had students who were worried about "hurting" the victim. I would assure them that you cannot hurt someone who needs CPR -- they are technically dead, already. If CPR revives them, or if the next step in the chain of survival brings them round, they aren't likely to be concerned about a few bruises or a cracked rib.


Island girl
said

They are just pandering to people who are squeamish about the mouth-to-mouth part and figure doing it half-assed is better than nothing. It IS important to ensure the airway is clear before doing a compression or a breath....otherwise think of the damage done. Like pushing on a full balloon that's been tied off.


JB in Ontario
said

C.P.R. stayed the same for several years which I learned when I was younger. Now they are changing how it is done quite often. This can be quite confusing.


Will
said

Every 3 to 5 years, they revamp CPR into a "new & improved" version. When you consider that less than 7% of CPR incidents result in a saved life, you would think they would be more concerned with getting it right the first time. If people don't know cpr or aren't sure they can do it right, they can still do artificial respiration, at least they are doing something useful.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Top Stories

A police officer removes a package containing a human foot from the Conservative Party headquarters in Ottawa on Tuesday, May 29, 2012. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Police confirm body parts sent to Ottawa from Montreal

More   4 Comments 4    5 Video(s) 5

Hacking

Official claims Iran has defeated powerful 'Flame' virus

More   13 Comments 13    1 Video(s) 1

Vic Toews, Public Safety Minister, and Jason Kenney, Minister of Citizenship, make an announcement related to terrorism research funding during a press conference in the foyer of the House of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Wednesday, May 30, 2012. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Ottawa pledges $1.1M to counter-terrorism research

More   1 Comments 1  

Most Talked about Stories

While Branson's comments (and activities) are arrogant in a million different ways, Clark's response was admirable. She kept her sense of humour with her joke about Branson's brand-name and his bad pick-up line, showing why humour is often the best response to arrogance.

D Austin (Fredericton)

B.C. premier rebuffs Branson's naked kitesurfing invite