Top Stories -   

1
An aerial view of the Bruce Power site with the Bruce B Generating Station in the foreground. (Photo courtesy Bruce Power)

Nuclear shipping plan dangerous: environmentalists

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV Southwestern Ontario: Nicole Lampa explains
Environmentalists in Southern Ontario say the federal government is ignoring their objections to a plan to ship radioactive parts across the country.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (27) Facebook   

An aerial view of the Bruce Power site with the Bruce B Generating Station in the foreground. (Photo courtesy Bruce Power)

Photos

An aerial view of the Bruce Power site with the Bruce B Generating Station in the foreground. (Photo courtesy Bruce Power)

View Larger Image

Date: Tue. Sep. 28 2010 1:00 PM ET

A group of environmentalists say it's a dangerous precedent to allow 16 radioactive generators to be shipped across the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River to be recycled overseas.

The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission will begin its two-day hearing in Ottawa Tuesday afternoon to discuss a plan for Bruce Power to ship the 16 100-tonne generators from the Bruce Power site in Owen Sound to Sweden.

Environmental groups and the mayors of more than 100 communities in the affected area oppose the plan.

Sierra Club Canada says the plan contravenes an environmental assessment approved by the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission. It added allowing Bruce Power to ship the generators through the region would set a dangerous precedent for more nuclear waste on Canadian waterways.

"Nuclear power is the dumbest mistake Canadians have ever made," John Bennett of Sierra told a news conference Tuesday morning in Ottawa.

Gordon Edwards of the Great Lakes United Task Force on Nuclear Power and Green Energy says his organization is mostly worried about the precedent, rather than the individual shipment by Bruce Power.

"This is just the tip of an enormous iceberg because once they ship these 16 steam generators, they're going to be shipping more and more and more radioactive waste," he said.

Two days of hearing began Tuesday afternoon, with an oral presentation from Bruce Power.

The commission has already said there are no safety concerns to prevent issuing a licence for the shipment.

"By their nature, steam generators are not radioactive," the commission said in a July notice.

"They have become contaminated during their service life. The contamination level is low and confined to the inner parts of the generators. Each and every generator is welded shut and sealed."

Spokespersons for various environmentalist groups accused the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission of not allowing a full debate on the issue during their Tuesday morning press conference.

Bruce Power is a private nuclear utility that generates about a fifth of Ontario's electricity. Its request to ship the 16 truck-sized generators is part of a plan to refurbish its plant near Lake Huron.

The original plan involved storing the generators in a cement bunker at Bruce Power's site in Tiverton, Ont. Bruce Power now wants to send the generators to Studsvik, a Swedish company that can reprocess the generators and reduce the amount of waste that would need to be stored.

The remaining waste would then be returned the Western Waste Management Facility at the Bruce Power site.

Among the dozens of non-governmental organizations, concerned citizen groups and organizations scheduled to speak at the hearing are Sierra Club Canada, Bruce County Council and the Swedish Environmental Movement's Nuclear Waste Secretariat.

The Great Lakes United Task Force on Nuclear Power and Green Energy says the public has been misinformed on the dangers of the steam generators.

"Our review of Bruce Power's and CNSC's documents have revealed that this hasty, ill-considered proposal has involved little to no planning whatsoever to deal with an emergency involving the sinking of this shipment, containing as it would over 1,400 tons of radioactive steam generators," Terry Lodge, an attorney representing the environmental coalition, said in a statement.

Bruce Power says a person would have to stand next to a generator for a few hours before they were subjected to the same amount of radiation emitted by a chest X-ray.

"The only difference between this shipment and the thousands of other shipments made each year is the size of these components," Bruce Power said in a statement.

"Because they do not fit into the containers traditionally used for shipping low level radioactive material, we require a special arrangement licence from our regulator."

Environmental groups said there are no guarantees what might happen if a boat carrying a generator ran aground or sunk.

With files from The Canadian Press

Comments are now closed for this story

Gerry from Toronto
said

Blah, blah, blah.This is nothing more than fear mongering by the environmentalists. They're probably all under petroleum's payroll anyway. What about all the petroleum that's been shipped on the great lakes? The dioxins in it? The freighters dumping sewage and heavy diesel in the lakes? What about the US gulf coast? A sealed container travelling on a ship in the great lakes is much safer than on our roads!These groups using the guise of "environmental concerns" should be ashamed of themselves.


Paul R
said

These environuts would have us living in caves and eating berries .... The sky is falling, the sky is falling.


Bob,Calgary,Alberta
said

The Sierra Club and the tree hugger gang always want to have it both ways i.e. we must reduce CO2 emissions but we cannot generate any nuclear waste. The diificult truth is that humans must have heat,water,food to live and in order to sustain life we have to create energy. Of course we don't want to create nuclear waste or have to ship spent generators for disposal but that is a fact of modern life. The professionals who have analyzed this problem and recommend the transportation solution are best able to make the decision. The Environmentalists believe that humans are essentially evil and the world should be kept pristine. The only real way to do that is for humans to die off. My simple belief is that there should be a happy medium: risks should be evaluated and decisions should be made based on proper analysis. We have no choice but to take some risks in order to sustain life. The Sierra Club and their ilk never really offer any solutions and never work with anyone to improve things.


George V.
said

No matter what is suggested or proposed there are always the nay sayers, that take the chicken little attitude" the sky is falling"


Roger In Courtice
said

"Nuclear power is the dumbest mistake Canadians have ever made," John Bennett of Sierra told a news conference Tuesday morning in Ottawa.

Hey John, your comments prove that drugs in one's teens really do have negative effects later in life. WHat is a viable alternative to provide enough power to this generation? Solar? Wind? Coal? Think, man,think!


KJ in Kingston Ontario
said

This is really a smoke screen to make nuclear power generation less practical because all good environmentalists HATE evil nuclear..... It is also very short-sighted because the backlash to seventy cent per kilowatt electric power bills that are on the way courtesy of the Green Energy program from he solar cells and windmills are going make make the environment trade-offs for nuclear look very very appealing indeed... Even Carbon capture coal power for that matter. If people are paying about 10 times the current rate for electricity they wouldn't be in the mood to plug any electric cars into the grid -- in fact they won't even be able to afford the basics and the consumer economy will be devastated.


Mike
said

What I would like people to do before trying to sound so informed on this subject is to remember that anytime you deal with nuclear material there is always a risk. I also find that the environmental groups always go off half cocked and try to spread fear when there is no need to. We in Canada are not stupit people and have to have these groups tell us that if we ship this material by water then the end of the world is just waiting to happen. For years nuclear material has been shipped with little to no problems occuring. As for having another environmental assessment study done, if our forefathers did as many environmental assessment studies as we now do Canadians would still be living in log cabins. In closing I wonder if anyone has ever though about the number of time nuclear material has been transported with out the public being aware of it for security reasons and guess what, the world is still here and the sun still came up the next day. I for one feel quite safe having this material moved by ship and before someone writes back to ask if I woud be willing to be on board that ship the answer is YES!


Neil
said

wow...some people are so stupid. Either read the article or read a book. This isn't the stuff you see in movies, where it's glowing green drums that Mr. Burns tries to hide in trees. These are just the generators. They're NOT shipping tons of nuclear waste as some posters are claiming.


Mike S., Timmins, ON
said

"Nuclear power is the dumbest mistake Canadians have ever made?" I'm sorry Mr. Bennett, but that single comment made you lose all credibility with me. 'No' to nuclear power, so 'yes' to power generation facilities such as Nanticoke Generating Station? You may also be against fossil fuel-based power plants as well, I can image, but those are our only viable alternatives when you toss nuclear out of the picture. As much as I would support large-scale wind and solar generation, they simply aren't feasible at such scales at this time, and hydro-electric generation can't happen at every stream or river. So what's left? I say let them ship the waste! By doing so they are showing a commitment to physically reduce the amount of waste we would have to store, which to me shows that those involved have thought of a long-term solution as opposed to just burying and forgetting it. And yes to more CANDU reactors! Nuclear power is the cleanest, safest, most efficient and cost-effective means of power-generation the world has to date, and I think it's downright silly to let a truly small minority of people force governments around the world to toss such technology aside because of fear-mongering and biased hype such as this.


David in Dartmouth
said

Very typical....! Environmentalists.....my butt! How is it that ONLY they know how these matters should be dealt with and how ONLY they know what is right for us? These people would have us all freezing in the dark....choking on noxious weeds beside a mountain of composting garbage....! Just about hwere I think their level of crdibility is..!


Will
said

Brian: I am a professional with over 30 years experience in the field of Nuclear Power Generation in Canada and overseas. Nuclear materials have been shipped many times (72 times to my personal knowlege and involvement) from Canada via marine transport (domestic and international). I am NOT advocating puting my head in the sand, nor anyone elses, what I am saying is "listen to professionals in the field". You should be taking your own advice instead of relying on popular fiction in forming your opinions. BTW, I am now a safety supervisor in international practice.


Ryan
said

The opening of the article is very misleading to those that have little information on the topic. This vessels are steam generators (boiler or heat exchanger). Heavy water from the heat transport system is used turn regular into steam which is then used to turn the turbine etc. The heavy water which transports the heat by design does not come into direct contact with the nuclear fuel which is contained in the fuel bundles. Over the course of operation during the last 30 year a few of the bundles have failed therefore allowing radioactive material to enter the heat transport system. This eventually makes its way into the containment side of the steam generator. Th


Glen in Chicago
said

Maybe we could use whale oil to light our lamps? Oh wait, can't do that. Maybe we could strip mine for coal? Can't do that either. How about clear cutting all of our forests for charcoal? Don't think so.


CraigW
said

It's not as if the anti-nuclear faction has ever exagerated claims or told outright lies when it comes to the safety of nuclear power. I can't think of any reason to doubt their genuine concern over public safety versus a desire for publicity now.


allan
said

Brian--your right, I got ahead of myself. But I believe misleading fearmongering is taking the place of sound factual info.


CanadianGeorge
said

We don't need experts or environmentalists to tell our brains that this would be DANGEROUS! The most Basic of Common Human Sense is lacking is almost everything in CDN gov't now-a-days! God Save Us All !


Steve From Alberta
said

These people are insane maybe they should take a class on nuclear power before they start to judge it, in fact it is one of the most enviormentally friendly power generation techniques, and shipping radio active material is not that dangerous... how do you think they get materials into hospitals to treat illnesses, they ship it!! and often by boat. The comment of nuclear power being Canada's biggest mistake, we have the CANDU reactor which makes nuclear power even safer and cheaper seriously these people should give their heads a shake and learn about things before they complain.


Paul
said

Actually the heavy water is not contaminated either. It acts as a moderator and coolent for the reaction. The nuclear fuel is contained in sealed tubes. The heavy water does contain tritium which is produced during the reaction and removed because a tritium buildup would be disasterous. That is also why we should not be giving Candu technology to tinpot dictators, the tritium can be used to make boosted fission and hydrogen bombs.


DANIEL H
said

This issue demonstrates that so few people, those commenting included, actual know what is being shipped and what the dangers are. Maybe we should all start making log cabins, chop wood for making fires to keep warm and cook, and plow the ground with horse drawn plows to grow our own food. Let the people with the knowledge do their job!


Brian
said

Al's description of how a steam generator works is flawed.

The steam generator vessel receives high temperature heavy water containing radioactive contaminants and activation products directly from the reactor core. The heat is transferred to the light water side of the steam generator and the light water provides steam to the generators.

Heavy water does not enter the turbines. Heavy water entering the steam generators DOES contain radioactive contamination.

Before accusing people of over reacting due to lack of education it would be less hypocritical to have accurate information himself.

In response to Will, road transport has been developed and used for decades. Radioactive material has never, to my knowledge, been shipped domestically by sea from/to a Canadian nuclear power station. This is the first time and there are inherent risks associated with doing ANYTHING for the first time.

And shipping by road has not been without incident either. There have been problems. For you assume there are no problems you just haven't accessed that information.

Passing the buck to anonymous "professionals" is a head in the sand attitude which fails to acknowledge the concerns of affected people.

No matter which side of the fence a person stands, "activism" SHOULD mean "actively searching for accurate information" without putting forth unfounded opinions on a topic.


Rick in NB, Ste Marie
said

I'm imagining a meeting of BP's board of directors before the Gulf disaster. " Maybe we should drill a second well as a safety precaution. Oh nothing will happen, lets just get er done." It's cheaper this way.


Dave, Ottawa
said

""Nuclear power is the dumbest mistake Canadians have ever made,"... Perhaps Mr. Bennett would like to inform us of how many wind turbines and corresponding acres of land it would take to replace our nuclear generation facilities.


JB in Ontario
said

1400 tons of radioactive waste being transported this time across the Great Lakes and the Atantic. If we allow this to happen, what dangerous radioactive waste will they want to transport next??


Will
said

Nuclear materials get shipped daily with no problems. This is just activism and fear mongering. There are proceedures and safety requirements for a reason. Let the professionals do their jobs.


al
said

I think the information is being overblown as usual. Steam turbines utilize D2O (heavy water)which has been changed into steam in order to drive the turbine. This steam is NOT radioactive.When will environmentalists get educated and stop creating unnecessary panic whenever the word nuclear is used?


peter
said

It makes perfect sense to transport by water because water is a natural radiation shield.


Gord
said

Can't this just be buried in a 1000 year lead lined time capsule bunker nearby? Sweden is a long way away and a lot could happen.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Top Stories

Graham James is seen exiting the courthouse in Winnipeg, Wednesday, Feb. 22. 2012.

Graham James apologizes to victims, hockey community

More  3 Video(s) 3

Public Safety Minister Vic Toews (left)and Justice Minister Rob Nicholson take part in a news conference to announce measures protecting children from internet predators, in Ottawa, Tuesday, Feb. 14, 2012. (Fred Chartrand / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Canadians will likely pay for online surveillance bill

More   49 Comments 49    2 Video(s) 2

Remi Ochlik and Marie Colvin

Journalists grieve for slain comrades in Syria

More   20 Comments 20    7 Video(s) 7