Top Stories -   

1

Queen sought anti-poverty grant to heat palace

Queen Elizabeth II returns to Buckingham Palace in a carriage after attending the Houses of Parliament in London for the official State Opening of Parliament. Friday Sept. 24, 2010. (AP  / Kirsty Wigglesworth) This Tuesday, May. 17, 2005 photo shows Buckingham Palace in London, England. (AP / Matt Dunham) The Queen, accompanied by her husband Prince Philip, and other members of the royal family stand on the main balcony of Buckingham Palace, as they attend the annual Trooping the Colour, in central London, Saturday June 13, 2009. (AP / Lefteris Pitarakis)
Queen Elizabeth II returns to Buckingham Palace in a carriage after attending the Houses of Parliament in London for the official State Opening of Parliament. Friday Sept. 24, 2010. (AP  / Kirsty Wigglesworth)

View Larger Image

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (28) Facebook   

Date: Friday Sep. 24, 2010 11:16 AM ET

LONDON — A government fund intended to provide subsidized heating to low-income Britons got some interest from an unexpected source: Queen Elizabeth II, who wanted help paying the bills at Buckingham Palace.

The official response, according to documents unearthed by The Independent newspaper, was that the handout might prove to be an embarrassment if word got out. The paper quotes an unnamed functionary as gently reminding the royal household that the money was meant for local authorities, housing associations, and the like.

"I also feel a bit uneasy about the probable adverse press coverage if the Palace were given a grant at the expense of say a hospital," the paper quoted the official as saying. "Sorry this doesn't sound more positive."

The newspaper said royal aides were looking for a way to pay the queen's spiraling utility bills, which had risen by 50 per cent to more than 1 million pounds ($1.58 million) in 2004. A letter written that year and addressed to Britain's culture department asked whether the queen could get a community energy grant to upgrade the heating systems at Buckingham Palace and Windsor Castle, the monarch's favourite weekend residence.

Officials were receptive to the idea, but eventually decided against it, the paper said Friday, citing documents obtained under Britain's Freedom of Information Act.

A Buckingham Palace spokeswoman confirmed that royal officials had explored the possibility of getting money under the program, saying it was part of an attempt to reduce both its burden on the taxpayer and improve the palaces' energy efficiency. She claimed the royal household was not initially aware that the money had been earmarked for low-income Britons.

She spoke anonymously in line with royal policy.

The queen's finances have been controversial in the past, with occasional debates about whether Britain's head of state -- whose role is almost exclusively ceremonial -- costs too much. The queen has royal residences across Britain, including Balmoral Castle in Scotland and Sandringham House in eastern England.

Other residences, such as the Palace of Holyroodhouse in Edinburgh and St. James's Palace in London, are used as offices or for functions.

Still, the queen has a reputation for frugality and the monarchy has recently been keen to show it gives value for money. Taxpayers fund the royal household to the tune of 38.2 million pounds ($60 million) a year, which the royal website points out is only 62 pence (less than a dollar) per person.

That amount doesn't include the cost of providing security for the queen and her family.

Expensive or not, word that the royal household had toyed with the idea of trying to get money intended for some of the nation's poorest citizens had a medieval ring to it and the drew the ire of Republic, which campaigns for the abolition of the British monarchy.

The group said the story provided "clear evidence of the contempt the palace has for ordinary people in this country."

The report also raised eyebrows among some of those interviewed on the streets of north London Friday. Nick Bowring, a 23-year-old fitness instructor, said he didn't think the queen should get help paying her heating bills.

"There are people who need it a lot more than she does," he said.

But Ian Laming, a 49-year-old carpenter, disagreed, saying he didn't see why the government advised the palace not to apply for the funds. He said he admired the queen and was pleased when she volunteered to pay more taxes some years ago when royal finances were under scrutiny.

"She helps a lot," he said, explaining that the monarch was big boon to the U.K. economy.

"You just have to walk down to Buckingham Palace to see all the tourists."

Comments are now closed for this story

al
said

Perhaps her Majesty should downsize like the rest of us common folks!! Or close off 90% of the palace, who says the whole place has to comfy & cozy warm!! That 's what we have to do to keep up the bills


paulb
said

A billion dollars in tourism is worth it. When will the Brithish learn to keep their feet out of their mouths.


rick
said

Maybe if these residents went condo they wouldn't need assistance and maybe even show a profit


Doug in Alberta
said

I guess there is 2 sides to the coin here. They are a head of state and do require to be compensated for that. Thats life folks, and they do draw in alot of tourist dollars (pounds) for the country and city of London. They do have alot of assets such as paintings, other property that could be sold but what about a copy right on all merchandise, they must also bring in cash from all that as well? I am no fan of the Queen but as long as the public keeps them as a head of state, anti up.


Lump O Coal
said

She'd be warmer with a heart and an ounce of humility. Pompous..... Put a sweater on. I suspect she's only going through the change of life again and again and....


Robert
said

A "Republic of Canada" has a nice ring to it.Just wait till Charles is crowned. Yup, "King Charles III.


MikeInBC
said

I'd bet that this was done without the knowledge of the Queen.


richard marchand
said

Buckingham Palace belongs to the nation and not to the Queen. Th State has to heat it, obviously.


Diana Spencer
said

In one sense I think this is absurd. She is one of the wealthiest people on the planet and she expects the taxpayer's to pay the heat for her luxury palaces? The public has no right to hang out there even though they pay for it so come on "Queen" get real!However, the properties such as the palaces aren't really her "personal" property...they are in "name" while she reigns but they are actually "state" properties as part of the monarchy that are handed down to the next monarch and so forth. Someone also mentioned that the monarchy is a huge tourist draw and a bonus to the Britain like Disney Land to Florida/California..true statement. What would Britain be without it..what would be its huge draw and selling point? Not the yellow teeth or kidney pie.Why can't they come to an arrangement where her personal wealth funds the hangers onto her coat-tails, like Charles and his dog and Andrew and his daughters and his ex-psycho and Annie and her butler boy and Edward and his Diana wanna-bee. The Queen should pay for them but exempt herself because she has an important role and her personal expenses and props she needs to "wow" the crowd are all part and parcel to her mystique.


Roland
said

I find it disgusting the way they treat the Queen, her royal majesty. Obviously the UK takes her for granted... and so do many of you here! @Linda, the richest woman is Oprah, and you don't get help because... you were not born and raised a monarch! Big difference between you and her. If say the Queen came to live in Canada... do you have any idea how many tourist dollars she would bring with her?! Easily far more money would be made by her presence here then it would ever cost us! Its amazing to me the Brits don't see that. Without the Royals around Brits would see tourist dollars plummet, even more lossed as the yrs would go by and people forgot what the palaces were for and so forth. In the end, they would no longer truly be the United Kingdom anymore and they would suffer a massive loss of cultural identity. Help the Queen get heat you fools! God save the Queen!


Paul ~ Kitchener
said

GOD SAVE the QUEEN !For those that can't read intelligently the idea from the Household Staff was to look at Government Funds to "UPGRADE the HEATING SYSTEM".The Queen isn't past due on her heating bill, nor does she even care, its paid from the household budget.It would only make sense, that the Government Fund should be looked at, for "UPGRADING" the Palace antiquated heating system, to the 21st century.When upgraded, the savings in the monthly cost, to the household budget, would be very substantial.The Queen is the Head of Canada (how fortunate we are) & it would take a Constitutional Amendment to alter this postion of Head of State." Long live the Queen ~ God Bless Canada "


Vancouver Girl
said

"If you look carefully at the story, the royal aides were actually checking to see if they could get help "upgrading the heating systems". That's not quite the same thing as getting help paying the heating bills."Totally agree!!!!


Valorie
said

If you look carefully at the story, the royal aides were actually checking to see if they could get help "upgrading the heating systems". That's not quite the same thing as getting help paying the heating bills. Also, what do I know, but wouldn't the heating bills be paid by the government ? And the heating systems on some of those old palaces might not even be near to being energy efficient.


kg1
said

Are you kidding me!!! She may not get a "raise" but i am darn sure she doesnt actually pay for anything. Perhaps if she is desperate she could consider selling off her collections or maybe renting out some rooms! LOL


K
said

Maybe the British government should give the Royal Family back it's real estate portfolio (which earned over 210 million last year for the government) which the Royals gave to the country in return for being supported by the state. That should even things out.


KJ in Kingston Ontario
said

I hope Canadians will break the link to this British farce soon -- it is just so embarrassing in this day and age.


Lynn
said

60 million a year and can't pay the 1.5 million dollar gas bill? It's hard not to laugh at how ridiculous that is. Perhaps, like everyone else its time to scale back on other expenses that aren't so neccessary to cover the items that are. I don't believe in dissolving the monarchy- they do a lot of wonderful, charitable things all over the world- but I do believe that it may be time to look at areas to cut-back on oh... hats maybe?


Lorne
said

Rent a portion of the palace out. This will drive more income. Austria is doing it - why can't the Queen?Better yet, buy a house and sell the palace. All stately functions just cost the people more.Can't feel sorry for her!!!!!!


darhren
said

The time of the top heavy monarchy seems to be coming to an end.


CYL
said

It's a good idea to conserve energy HRH so turn out the lights you're not using. Some of those rooms could be rented out to help pay the bills.


Linda C. Spahr
said

AWWWW, the richest woman in the world wants help with heating her palaces. How special is THAT? Asking for the money from an agency set up for the sole purpose of helping the poor to boot. She should be ashamed of herself! Nobody helps me heat my house. Where is the 'lady' in Monarch these days?


spaz
said

PITTY......there must be the odd old oil painting gather dust in an alcove we could burn on a cold damp night to take the chill away......sorry....that cold draft was a smile from Camilla


Cynthia Blatherwick
said

Retch!


Pip pip tut tut I fell in a rut!
said

Funny is it weren't so absolutely absurd.


Richard in New Brunswick
said

I might be wrong but doesn't Buckingham Palace and some of the other royal residences belong to the state and not the Queen personally?Those who argue that the royal family costs too much just can't do basic arithmetic. The Queen & Company are to Britain what DisneyWorld is to Orlando or DisneyLand to California... A HUGE DRAW of millions of tourists and their dollars.I don't have figures at my fingertips but I'd bet a tenner that, on balance, the Queen & Company are a net asset to the land, not a liability.I hope I don't live to see the day when some addle-minded government puts it to the test by abolishing the monarchy, turning Windsor Castle into a subdivision and Buckingham Palace into low-cost housing. Let's see how many tourist dollars would flow into the treasury then!


Irritable Canadian
said

So what? They haven't given her an increase in cash since what -- 1990??! -- and they expect that costs to run the residences won't increase in 20 years? Give me a break. The Queen gives tons of value to her subjects -- and at about 30 pence per person. That's not bad, not bad at all. But you know, if you want a head of state -- or frankly any sort of head of government or state to represent your country -- you need to ante up. 30 pence ain't bad.


mead
said

$1.58 million - this is not very efficient, or ecco friendly.


Lz in Edmonton
said

Perhaps the Queen and company should sell some of their assets to raise money when heating bills become a problem. Just a thought for the common person.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Top Stories

A police officer removes a package containing a human foot from the Conservative Party headquarters in Ottawa on Tuesday, May 29, 2012. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Police confirm body parts sent to Ottawa from Montreal

More   4 Comments 4    5 Video(s) 5

Hacking

Official claims Iran has defeated powerful 'Flame' virus

More   13 Comments 13    1 Video(s) 1

Vic Toews, Public Safety Minister, and Jason Kenney, Minister of Citizenship, make an announcement related to terrorism research funding during a press conference in the foyer of the House of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Wednesday, May 30, 2012. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Ottawa pledges $1.1M to counter-terrorism research

More   1 Comments 1  

Most Talked about Stories

While Branson's comments (and activities) are arrogant in a million different ways, Clark's response was admirable. She kept her sense of humour with her joke about Branson's brand-name and his bad pick-up line, showing why humour is often the best response to arrogance.

D Austin (Fredericton)

B.C. premier rebuffs Branson's naked kitesurfing invite