Top Stories -   

1

Banks, not customers, should pay for reforms: Carney

Bank of Canada Governor Mark Carney holds a press conference at the National Press Theatre following the release of the Monetary Policy Report in Ottawa on July 22, 2010. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS)
Bank of Canada Governor Mark Carney holds a press conference at the National Press Theatre following the release of the Monetary Policy Report in Ottawa on July 22, 2010. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

View Larger Image

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (18) Facebook   

Date: Tuesday Sep. 14, 2010 2:42 PM ET

Commercial banks should cut costs rather than pass along costs of reform to customers, Bank of Canada Governor Mark Carney said in a speech at the German central bank Tuesday.

"Creating more resilient institutions requires more and better capital," Carney said, says in notes of the text released in Ottawa.

That strengthened position would help institutions better weather financial storms and create greater goodwill with shareholders and customers alike.

Unfortunately, increasing capital also makes the operating costs for financial institutions rise, he said at a symposium at the Deutsche Bundesbank in Germany, but the Bank of Canada merely considers that a cost of doing business in a climate where a lack of prudent risk management caused a worldwide financial disaster.

As Carney put it, a key goal in the G20 banking reforms is to "create a system that can withstand the failure of any single financial institution."

He told the symposium, "a financial sector that is less volatile, less prone to debilitating crises, and more robust in the face of adverse shocks is likely to be viewed more favourably by investors and attract the investment needed to continue to expand in a sustainable manner."

That picture of the financial sector sounds ideal as markets continue their slow climb back from the brink, but it comes with a significant cost; namely the amount of capital that financial institutions will have to retain to offset risk.

Carney went on to say that in order to maintain customer and investor confidence, and to ensure that investment continues in the industry, those costs cannot be borne solely by passing them along to consumers.

According to Carney, "if banks were to reduce personnel expenses by only 10 per cent, they could lower spreads by an amount that would completely offset the impact of a 2-percentage-point increase in capital requirements."

While personnel cuts are just one example of many, Carney made it clear that these kinds of internal cost-cutting measures would be the best way to meet the new reform requirements without hurting the integrity of day-to-day operations in banks and financial institutions.

Comments are now closed for this story

Frank D.
said

You've got to love the greedy mentality of these banks. They want us, the depositors of their institutions, to pick up the tab for the reforms that are going to be imposed by the government. Correct me if I am wrong, but you bankers are the ones who lent all our money from your institutions to companies who needed capital to put up factories in Mexico,......that eventualey put us out of work,.....then in the next breath , you want to foreclose on our homes and toss us customers out into the street!


Help Ameerica
said

Government should pay taxes not citizens It's easy make print more money = to what we have built as assets. RATHER than borrowing on assests which you currently do


daveyboy
said

Where do you think banks will get their money from to pay for everything dork.


KJ in Kingston Ontario
said

It is always nice to see the head of a major agency or organization with a good sense of humour. Make THE BANKS PAY AND NOT THE CUSTOMERS --- I laughed hysterically for nearly 5 minutes.


Linda
said

It is funny how socialism is getting a bad rap these days, yet even the rapid capitalists want to use an essential tenet of socialism - wage controls and a "robin hood" perspective of the rich. For anyone that scoffs, take a quick step back and listen for the "pop", because controls on how much money a person makes, particularily if they are making considerably more than the majority, is socialism at its finest.


Chuck
said

Who is Carney's audience here? Bankers won't take kindly to being told how to run their business. Carney may be speaking to consumers and he knows that consumers think that banks gouge them. But Carney runs the risk of losing credibility doing this - he will be seen as ineffective if the banks don't listen. Not a bright move on his part to make these comments.


russ
said

Thank you Mr. Carney. The banks have taken enough of my money already. Let them pay!


CYL
said

is this guy for real, let the corps or banks pay and it will be passed on to customers, consumers and anyone else.


CWS Saskatoon
said

Why in hell should the bank personnel both present and past take the hit in cutting costs? It certainly will not be the executive and directors that will get less pay.


SDC in NS
said

Oh yeah - right. That'll work. Thanks Mark. The banks are so altruistic - they'll never pass on costs to the consumer. What planet are you from? The banks didn't get to the point of making over $1 billion per quarter EACH... except by charging us to death!


Scott, Winnipeg
said

The goverment should allow people to access a portion of their unused EI for debt repayment, and only debt repayment. Cancel personal income taxes, increase GST and PST. Why punish someone for earning income by taxing it.Remove payroll taxes, there is no reason to tax a company for paying their employees.


Al-Riyaz
said

For those who think Mr. Carney's words will be interpreted to mean that Exec. management will cut bonuses, etc., think again.Mark Carney has effectively told the banks that they should lay off mid to lower management people and some of the 'unnecessary' front end employees in order to cut "personnel expenses" against bottom line. This would mean more average Canadians would be joining the lines of the unemployed, and slower service at the banks when one can't do what they need via internet banking channels. Executives are not sweating at all as a result of what Mr. Carney has stated.


Kim in Calgary
said

Bonuses are seldom paid to the front line bankers and for years I worked many hours of overtime all unpaid. The executives and those who sell the insurance/investment banking products are the ones that reap the outrageous bonus amounts. So different than the oil patch where all employees receive a bonus almost yearly. Knowing the banks and they are all the same (I have worked for 4 of the majors), cost cutting will mean even less service.


PBW
said

Carney comments that ". . . banks should consider another option --cutting operating costs by reducing personnel expenses, which could involve downsizing or reducing executive bonuses". It is this aspect of banks and finance houses that has most people steaming. I'm not saying that bonuses should be totally scrapped, only that they be a) NOT part of an employment contract; b) awarded only for outstanding performance; and c) of a reasonable amount. The "grunts" on the front lines, I am sure, do not like the ideas of their senior managers and executives making many multiples of their (the grunts') gross income, just as a bonus. The times when automatic bonuses are a perquisite of office are past. I imagine that money saved simply by halving bonuses currently given would cover at least 50% of costs for a bank. Bringing all bonuses to reasonable levels and awarding only for performance would free up many millions more.


p0d0
said

Carney makes between $365,200 and $429,600 per year to say 0.25% up/down once per month. He's right, bank execs ARE overpaid, especially ones that work for the gov't.


Amar
said

The banks are paying no interest on savings and the threat of a bank run or "holiday" is a real possibility, what's the point? I rather invest in a good quality safe.


rick
said

get rid of all bonuses and outrageous severence packages


SAM
said

How about taking advantage of the HST in Ontario & BC - PST used to be absorbed as an expense.As of July 1st the PST has been combined with GST and is now refundable! So imagine $100 million in expenses for each bank (probably far more) at 8% now going back into the banks pocket - $8 million favorable!


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Top Stories

A police officer removes a package containing a human foot from the Conservative Party headquarters in Ottawa on Tuesday, May 29, 2012. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Police confirm body parts sent to Ottawa from Montreal

More   4 Comments 4    5 Video(s) 5

Hacking

Official claims Iran has defeated powerful 'Flame' virus

More   12 Comments 12    1 Video(s) 1

Vic Toews, Public Safety Minister, and Jason Kenney, Minister of Citizenship, make an announcement related to terrorism research funding during a press conference in the foyer of the House of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Wednesday, May 30, 2012. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Ottawa pledges $1.1M to counter-terrorism research

More    Comments  

Most Talked about Stories

While Branson's comments (and activities) are arrogant in a million different ways, Clark's response was admirable. She kept her sense of humour with her joke about Branson's brand-name and his bad pick-up line, showing why humour is often the best response to arrogance.

D Austin (Fredericton)

B.C. premier rebuffs Branson's naked kitesurfing invite