News Sections
Blood Services allowed to ban gay men's donations
CTV News Video
|
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Thu. Sep. 9 2010 9:59 PM ET
Canadian Blood Services is legally allowed to ban men who have sex with men from donating blood, an Ontario court has found. Gay rights groups are furious with the decision.
In a ruling Thursday, the Ontario Superior Court dismissed a constitutional challenge from a man who tried to fight the policy. The court decided that the law does not give someone the right to donate blood. It also noted that the Charter of Rights does not apply to the blood agency's policies, because it is not a government entity.
The ruling stems from a case that began with Canadian Blood Services suing a gay man named Kyle Freeman, who lied about his sexual status when he donated blood several times between 1990 and 2002. Once the agency learned that Freeman had lied on his questionnaires, they sued.
Freeman argued he lied because the policy banning gay men from donating wasn't scientifically justified and violated his rights. He launched a counterclaim under the Charter.
But on Thursday, the court dismissed the challenge, finding Freeman liable for $10,000 for negligent misrepresentation.
The judge in the case, Justice Catherine Aitken, did note in her written decision that gay and bisexual men may feel "a loss of dignity, a feeling of marginalization, a sense of disappointment, and a sense of injustice" when denied the opportunity to give blood.
But she ruled that the impact of that injustice is not "in the same league" as a blood recipient being asked to accept lower safety standards.
Canadian Blood Services chief Graham Sher said "we are reassured that the court has confirmed that our policy, with respect to men who have sex with men, is not discriminatory."
He added: "blood donation is not a right, it's a privilege we try to extend to as many Canadians as possible."
Anger over ruling
Egale Canada spokesperson Helen Kennedy expressed disappointment with the decision, saying, "The negative consequences this ruling has on Charter rights are enormous."
Monique Doolittle-Romas, the executive director of the Canadian AIDS Society (CAS), says it's "disturbing" that the court framed the case as a "contest" between safety and gay rights.
CAS Board Vice-Chair Jeffrey Keller added in a statement: "In the end, this simply means that groups, such as CAS, [Canadian Federation of Students] and Egale, will continue to apply pressure until CBS relents and changes its outdated policy. It's a divisive policy that turns away many young adults who are dissatisfied with it, and in the process, curtails Canada's blood supply."
"We will keep fighting for change that will produce an improved screening question that respects both the safety of the blood supply and human rights."
Canadian Blood Services requires prospective blood donors to complete questionnaires ahead of their donation about their medical history and potentially harmful behaviour.
Intravenous drug users, people who may have been exposed to Creutzfeld-Jakob disease (mad cow disease), people who have exchanged money for sex or drugs are all permanently banned. Currently, men who had sex with men from 1977 onwards (the year estimated as the start of the AIDS epidemic) also face "indefinite deferrals" from donations.
Earlier this year, two doctors wrote in an article in the Canadian Medical Association Journal that Canada's ban on donations from homosexual men is outdated and unfair.
Dr. Mark Wainberg, the head of the McGill University AIDS Centre, and Dr. Norbert Gilmore, of the McGill Centre for Medicine, Ethics and Law, argued that fears of the potential for HIV transmission are unfounded, because it is almost impossible for today's HIV tests to produce false results.
They also argued that a better policy would be to allow donations only from gay men in long-term, monogamous relationships. Those with multiple sex partners should still be barred, just as heterosexuals with multiple partners currently face one-year deferrals, they argued.
Josephine Sirna, who was infected with Hepatitis C after receiving a blood transfusion, said that keeping the public safe is paramount.
"They're taking that precaution to keep me and my health as safe as possible," she said Thursday.
Canada's blood donation system was tainted in the 1980s after infections became widespread because of Hepatitis C. The government paid out hundreds of millions of dollars in response to the scandal.
With a report from CTV's Roger Smith
User Tools
Related Stories
Most Popular
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
I think he was pushed to take matters into his own hands. I have a teenage son and if he was involved with a drug dealer I would be furious and try anything to save him like this father did for his daughter. Why do police often say they can't do anything until it's too late? Whether it be a drug dealer or an abusive spouse, the police can't seem to do anything until something really bad happens. In this case they could have raided the drug dealers home and arrested him. The whole town knew what was going on in that house but yet the police chose to do nothing. Release this man and give him a medal for doing the right thing by his daughter. I can't wait to see the episode on W5, I will certainly be watching this one.
Email
Comments are now closed for this story
BABE
said
Dawn
said
Hate to break it to all you haters....but just because some one is gay doesn't mean they shouldn't have the same rights as anyone else. FFS, prisioners have more rights.
Adam - Brampton
said
toto
said
Army Ant from Ottawa
said
MP
said
"It comes down to this: suppose you need blood...and just pretend for one second you have a choice:
1) Blood from a 75 yr old man who has been married to the same woman for 55 years or
2) Blood from a gay guy.
who's blood do you want?"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Again, you're judging LIFESTYLE, not the quality of the end product = blood / plasma.
As long as it's been tested and certified clean, does it really....REALLY matter what the LIFESTYLE of the donor is/was?
Michael
said
cancam
said
Cry Me A River!
said
Jason
said
Dustin
said
lol
said
Travis
said
adam
said
Tom
said
Dan
said
Robert
said
Sudbury Donor
said
BCDarr
said
sarah
said
Gord
said
mark
said
Dan
said
mario
said
McKenzie
said
B. Kelley, Ontario
said
THE
said
Roger Dodier
said
10-78
said
Ian
said
Geoff
said
Why aren't you people afraid of this statement? Oh right! Because straight people who sleep around don't get HIV. Right. Silly me.
Man some of you are so ignorant it hurts!
jake
said
This decision is beyond ridiculous and is based on ancient ignorance of the causes or transmission. Does a woman who has experienced multiple partners know if any of her partners were Bi-sexual or IV drug users.
Surely the blood can be tested.
charlie
said
hyphen Pearce
said
LB
said
jake
said
Kowalski
said
RCR
said
Tony (from Azilda)
said
CB
said
Screening of donors is a very common practice here in Canada and in the US. The use of the questionnaires is the FIRST step when screening donors. As a person who works in the blood and plasma industry, ALL companies that deal with receiving and distributing blood products to patients have a very strict process when screening donors. This screening process is to help with the health and safety of the blood products donated. The CBS and other organizations not only want to have quality products, but they MUST have quality products that meet specific standards. Hence the need for these types of screening processes. Would you be willing to risk CBS lowering their quality screening standards when you have to recieve a blood transfusion??
Mark
said
Scott Stelmaschuk
said
Heather
said
Kim
said
vinnie
said
1) Blood from a 75 yr old man who has been married to the same woman for 55 years or
2) Blood from a gay guy.
who's blood do you want?
Kathy
said
And how long as CBS been around? They've ALWAYS had those questions on their paperwork. And it's only just NOW that the homosexual community is getting up in arms? Really?
kestral
said
terry jones
said
Smarty Pants
said
NCJ
said
happy
said
The Rat
said
Brian in calgary
said
Lily
said
viral venus
said
MP
said
Then medicine / pharmeceutical industries better find a way to product perfectly compatible synthetic blood / plasma.
Tom
said
James T
said
Dave
said
Jarrell
said
Keith in Brampton
said
Dave
said
Vickie
said
Pat
said
Ross from Whitby
said
Chris - Kitchener
said
Whew !
said
Sandusky
said
alien
said
Dan
said
danya
said
Robin
said
Rick @ Ottawa
said
Mark
said
Margo
said
TT
said
Glenn C
said
RK
said
Mark Palmer
said
Jeff in Ottawa
said
Adam in Bowmanville
said
There are legitimate reasons to not accept blood from people due to the fact that the supply may be contaminated. The receiver shouldn't have to worry about where it came from and I give the example of those who have travelled to other countries who can't give blood or those who have had peircings, or those who do drugs, etc, etc.
If there's a heightened risk of infecting a blood supply from any factor, including men having sex with men, then I somewhat agree with this decision.
Andy
said
James Wilson
said
SMcentee
said
redhed
said
Francis the Libertarian
said
Safety First
said
The
said
MacW
said
Thinkingmachine2
said
Tony
said
Elaine
said
Chris
said
Allan K, Vancouver, BC
said
Darcy
said
Will
said
Chuck Ryer
said
Brian Fr Langley
said
crystal
said
Catherine Kingdom
said
abc
said
Hannibal
said
Ken
said
Lynn
said
LD
said
JROC
said
Redneck Albertan
said
RGBrook
said
Trevor in the Hat
said
Ash A
said
realist
said
Christian McCulloch
said
ann carlin
said
Feeling better in NB
said
RK
said
mandosa
said
MP
said
Wow! Just WOW!