Top Stories -   

1

EU condemns stoning sentence in adultery case

Demonstrators hold portraits of Iranian woman Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani during a protest in front of the Iran embassy in Rome, Thursday, Sept. 2, 2010. (AP / Gregorio Borgia)
Demonstrators hold portraits of Iranian woman Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani during a protest in front of the Iran embassy in Rome, Thursday, Sept. 2, 2010. (AP / Gregorio Borgia)

View Larger Image

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (5) Facebook   

Date: Wednesday Sep. 8, 2010 4:21 PM ET

BRUSSELS, Belgium — European Union nations and the continent's biggest human rights organization slammed Iran on Wednesday for its plan to stone a woman convicted of adultery, while Iran's ambassador to the Vatican said it "is possible" the punishment could be eased.

The plight of Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani, a 43-year-old mother of two, has cast a harsh light on Iran's version of Islamic justice and caused a global outcry. Iran says it has put the stoning on hold for now but has also indicated Ashtiani could be hanged for her conviction of playing a role in her husband's 2005 murder.

In an interview broadcast on Italian state TV Wednesday, Tehran's envoy to the Holy See gave the strongest indication yet that Iran may set aside the death penalty -- or at least the stoning -- in Ashtiani's case.

Ali Akbar Naseri stressed that Islamic law was "inspired by clemency and forgiveness." Asked if that meant Ashtiani could receive clemency, he replied that "some mitigation of the punishment is possible" and said the case was under study by experts.

Though he did not elaborate, the comments also appeared to be a positive response to the Vatican's hint that it would try behind-the-scenes diplomacy to spare Ashtiani's life.

The European Union Parliament in Strasbourg, France, passed a resolution Wednesday condemning Tehran, a move that comes on the heels of EU Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso calling stoning "barbaric." The vote passed by a huge 658-to-1 margin with 22 abstentions. The vote against was an error and was to be amended in the parliamentary records later.

Sweden summoned Iran's ambassador to protest the sentence.

"It is important that we are not passive in a case that -- except for her own destiny -- has become a symbol for the repression in Iran," Sweden's Foreign Minister Carl Bildt said. "We are against the death penalty in all cases, but stoning is a specifically vile form of the death penalty."

German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle released a statement saying he is "deeply worried for Ms. Ashtiani's life."

"Iran has to respect human rights, especially because it committed to do so under international law," Westerwelle said. It is "not a question of religion, but a question of fundamental human dignity."

The sentiments were echoed by the 47-nation Council of Europe, the continent's biggest human rights organization. It called on the Islamic republic's parliamentary speaker, Ali Larijani, to do his utmost to fully repeal the sentence.

"This inhuman sentence and the mistreatment that Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani is suffering cast a tragic shadow on your country," wrote Mevlut Cavusoglu, President of the Council's Parliamentary Assembly.

On Iran's state-run Press TV, Foreign Ministry spokesman Ramin Mehmanparast repeated previous statements that plans to carry out the stoning have been "stopped" while judiciary officials also study the punishment for Ashtiani's conviction of playing on role in her husband's 2005 murder.

Ashtiani's lawyer, Houtan Javid Kian, told The Associated Press there has been no change in her case and the stoning sentence was suspended but not officially cancelled. He has said Ashtiani was never formally put on trial on the charge of being an accomplice to murder and was not allowed to mount a defence.

On Monday, Kian said he had received word that his client was lashed 99 times last week in a separate punishment after British newspaper ran a picture of an unveiled woman mistakenly identified as Ashtiani. The newspaper, the Times of London, apologized for the error.

There has been no official Iranian confirmation of the new punishment.

On Sunday, the Vatican raised the possibility of using its diplomatic channels in the case but it has stopped short of saying such efforts had begun. Some Western officials, including Italian Foreign Minister Franco Frattini, have said they don't believe Iran will carry out the stoning following the international outcry.

But Iran has at times struck a defiant tone. Even an offer of asylum from Brazil -- which is on friendly terms with Tehran -- went nowhere.

Mehmanparast accused the United States and other Western countries of trying to "exploit" the case and turn it into a "political charade."

"Our country has been under a lot of political pressure by the U.S. and other Western countries over its nuclear work," he noted.

The European Parliament, however, insisted universal human rights were what was at stake.

In its resolution, it said that "a sentence of death by stoning can never be justified."

Comments are now closed for this story

KJ in Kingston Ontario
said

It is a rather bizarre argument that because so-called Christian states existing millennium or more ago imposed horrific penalties for what we in the West now regard as private matters --- such as whether or not to wear hair covering in public places --- or remain faithful to a mate -- we now are morally equivalent to the Iranian system which has no concept of personal freedom or individual rights. I am sure that most of these people would find themselves in prison if they moved to Iran and attempted conduct their lives the same way they do here in Canada.


Brockavitch
said

Great, now what are the Europeans really going to do about it? Or will things continue as they normally do with the United States, Britain and Canada being the only countries to truly stand up for human rights? The Germans don't really care, Italy's been slowly getting into the game, and the French still only act in the interests of their own imperial ambitions. The European Union is a sham, and has been horrendously soft on such barbaric practices in the Islamic world. This resolution is typical of that. Back up the resolution with actual consequences if this happens.


Sober, Newmarket
said

What a barbaric ideology that first gives a defenseless woman 99 lashes and then goes ahead with planning to stone her. And no word about the men who were involved. It will certainly take a long time before that ideology will be welcomed among civilized cultures.


B. Kelley, Ontario
said

These condemnations are admirable but they just may have the opposite effect to that intended. The mentality of the Iranian leadership leads them to thumb their noses at the western world at every opportunity and our outrage just might give them the incentive they need to justify carrying out the sentence. Tehran follows an in-your-face form of international diplomacy and I fear that this unfortunate woman may well be used to advertise their perverted sense of justice and to once again tell us to go to hell with our values.


Prof. Pye Chartt
said

According to kooky left-wing extremists in Canada (all of whom reside in the Liberal and NDP camps), Americans and Israelis are also murderous "barbarians," not just Iranian Muslims who pummel women to death with rocks, and celebrate "justice" with a twisted and righteous sense of satisfaction.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Top Stories

Sub.-Lt. Jeffrey Paul Delisle is escorted from provincial court in Halifax on Tuesday, Jan. 17, 2012.

Moscow spy case details may never be known

More    Comments    2 Video(s) 2

Commuters wait for the first train after a five-hour work stoppage by urban rail workers, as all other public transport employees are on a 48-hour strike, in Athens on Friday, Feb. 10, 2012. (AP Photo/Thanassis Stavrakis)

Greek unions launch two-day strike, bailout in limbo

More   3 Comments 3  

Most Talked about Stories

I think he was pushed to take matters into his own hands. I have a teenage son and if he was involved with a drug dealer I would be furious and try anything to save him like this father did for his daughter. Why do police often say they can't do anything until it's too late? Whether it be a drug dealer or an abusive spouse, the police can't seem to do anything until something really bad happens. In this case they could have raided the drug dealers home and arrested him. The whole town knew what was going on in that house but yet the police chose to do nothing. Release this man and give him a medal for doing the right thing by his daughter. I can't wait to see the episode on W5, I will certainly be watching this one.

Shelley

W5: How far would you go to save your child?