Top Stories -   

1

More birds dying in oil sands than first reported: study

Oil sands
Oil sands

View Larger Image

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (17) Facebook   

Date: Tuesday Sep. 7, 2010 10:59 PM ET

A new report suggests more birds are dying in Alberta's tar sands than the government has let on.

Government industries have estimated that on average, about 65 birds die each year from tailings pond exposure, according to the study released Tuesday. The mean annual rate was determined by analyzing the mortality rate between 2000 and 2007.

However the study, which has been published in September's edition of The Wilson Journal of Ornithology, suggests a number that is at least seven times higher than the industries estimate.

Researchers report that on average, between 458 and 5,029 birds die each year at the Bitumen Tailings Pond in northeastern Alberta.

In fact, researchers say that average is likely conservative because the data that was studied doesn't include bird deaths that occurred before spring, between spring and fall migration and after fall migration.

Researchers say the wide range is due to spatial and temporal variations in bird mortality rates.

Tailings ponds are said to contain bitumen, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, volatile organic compounds, naphthenic acids, brine, heavy metals, and ammonia.

The study concludes by saying the government needs to introduce a system that is "statistically valid" and is standardized.

"Systematic monitoring and accurate, timely reporting would provide data useful to all those concerned with bird conservation and management in the tar sands region," the study says.

Dr. Kevin Timoney, a scientist with Treeline Ecological Research, said the industries' estimates are hampering efforts to protect wildlife in the tar sands.

"The ad hoc monitoring by industry, sanctioned by government, cannot address pressing questions whose answers would aid in the conservation of both migratory and resident birds," said Timoney, a co-author of the study.

Greenpeace Canada expressed outrage at the finding of the study and released a statement asking for an "independent scientific analysis."

"We can no longer let the fox guard the hen house," Mike Hudema, Greenpeace climate and energy campaigner, was quoted as saying. "It has become glaringly obvious that we can't trust the government to give us accurate information on the tar sands industry.

"It's time for independent scientific analysis so that the public knows the full scope of this horrific industry and can make a decision about the kind of future we want to invest in: a toxic legacy or a green economy we can all live and breathe in?"

The study also found:

  • Landing deterrent systems at tailings ponds are only partially effective and don't always prevent bird deaths.
  • Researchers are unable to determine the fate of lightly oiled birds that continue on the migration path.
  • There is not enough data on deaths reported during extreme weather or how often there are circumstances leading to massive bird deaths.
The Alberta government stated that oilsands companies must have monitoring and deterrence mechanisms in operation for all animals.

However, Alberta Sustainable Resource Development Minister Mel Knight admitted that more needs to be done.

"I would not argue at all with the study with respect to the fact that there could be better work done on monitoring, and we're going to work to do that," he said. "At the end of the day we'll come to appreciate the advice that is being given to us and we'll use it."

Comments are now closed for this story

William
said

human beings have been polluting the earth for the last 120 years, the oil sands are dangerous, and also the uranium mines in northern Alberta, and in northern Saskatchewan are dangerous also since they have radiation. The modern world is not a good place to be in. And the gov. should be trying to make things better.


Steve
said

A survey conducted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service counted 2.3 million American bird hunters in 2007. Assuming the same ratio to population, Canada would have another 200,000, making the combined total 2.5 million. Together, these hunters annually bag more than 100 million waterfowl migrating back and forth across our shared border. Unfortunately, not all hunters are expert marksman, not by a long shot. A report from the U.S. Humane Society estimates that for every bird taken, another is mortally wounded. Quoting the report's author, "millions of ducks and geese are shot and injured, and suffer terribly before they die."Recently, in a courtroom near Edmonton, tables are stacked high with dozens of binders; all containing "prosecution's evidence" in the trial of Syncrude for the accidental death of precisely 1,606 ducks. Two months have been set aside for the trial but prosecutors say it could take much longer to present all of that material - an incredible revelation when one considers that Syncrude has readily admitted that what the Crown alleges happened, actually happened.What the company disputes is the Crown's assertion that the failure to have the usual duck-deterring noise makers operating was a criminal act. Witnesses will be called to relate in agonizing detail the death struggles of those 1,606 ducks. But there will be no witnesses to relate the story of the millions ofshotgun-wounded waterfowl left behind in the reeds to suffer in silence. The fossil fuel energy industry has long been a favourite whipping boy, but what about bird deaths in the wind energy industry? Recent data cited by the Golden Gate Audubon Society show that wind farms in California's Altamont Pass kill more than 7,000 birds a year, including 94 golden eagles and more than 1, 600 falcons, hawks and owls. Wind power advocates are quick to point out that Altamont is a worst case because of its high-speed turbine blades, and it's true that newer technology is much more bird-friendly. Yet, the toll remains high and the species killed important. Michael Fry of the American Bird Conservancy estimates that wind power turbine blades kill at least 75,000 birds a year. And a 2007 report by the U.S. National Academy of Sciences pointed out that peregrine falcons and other raptors that "are lower in abundance than many other bird species" are attracted to the same windy areas favoured for power turbines. Regardless of the exact figure, no one can deny that the North American wind power bird toll is significant and that eagles, falcons, hawks and owls are the more vulnerable, not the hugely plentiful game birds.Then there's the deadliest bird killer of all: urban office and condo tower windows. Sitting on a major flight path, Toronto is Canada's ground zero for migratory bird collision deaths. The non-profit group Fatal Light Awareness Program estimates that more than one million birds die in the city each year. The Toronto Humane Society points out that most are important insect-eating species such as warblers, flycatchers, wrens, kinglets, thrushes and vireos that migrate at night guided by star constellations. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service estimates that the North American toll from collision with man-made structures to be as many as one billion birds annually.The second most-lethal perpetrators of bird deaths lurk in North America's backyards. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service estimates that domestic and feral cats kill hundreds of millions of songbirds each year. The most vulnerable are fledglings attacked soon after taking the plunge from the nest on untested wings. And, unlike those prolific ducks, the species taken most often are considered to be either "endangered, threatened or of conservation concern." Bird experts point out that these lovely little fliers aren't simply aesthetically important: Small birds are the ultimate organic insecticide, eating enormous numbers of harmful insects. They are also vital as pollinators of many agricultural and ornamental plant species. Given the economic importance of the commercial and home-gardening supply industry, many jobs depend on songbird survival.I want to make my position clear. I'm not opposed to game bird hunting. But I would support marksmanship testing as a condition of getting a hunting licence. I'm not against wind power. But Ibelieve this and other so-called "green" industries shouldn't get a free ride on the considerable environmental impacts they do have. I'm not opposed to tall buildings. But I believe that lights should be turned off at night and window materials that minimize bird deaths should be required. And I don't dislike cats, but I think they should be kept indoors during nesting season.As for the industry that produces a substance fundamentally important to our way of life, I believe oil producers should also be held accountable. But how, in the name of fairness and perspective, can the accidental death of 1,606 game birds, fewer in number than those wounded and left to die every few minutes of hunting season, be the subject of a costly trial that damages the carefully built reputation of a great Canadian energy company; and an entire industry?


allan
said

Most people dont give a damm about birds dying. More are killed on the roads than in the oilsands ponds. Oh, and I dont give a heck about seals either.


Phillip Martin
said

First of all this ANONYMOUS writer does not know that it is Albertas OILSANDS. Tar is man made. Secondly he has just joined the anti-oilsands bandwagon of selective anti-oilsands group who want the energy but dont understand that his gas comes from Alberta. Maybe we should get it from Saudi Arabia, a real human rights paradise. Beheadings. Women are second class; stonings daily. Wonderful place.


Kris D.
said

You mean once-prestine ponds that are not polluted with bitumen, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, volatile organic compounds, naphthenic acids, brine, heavy metals, and ammonia are causing more birds to die? And the government is lying about it? I don't beleive it! Stupid to the last drop...


Barb
said

I once heard the Tar Sands referred to as Mordor..............


Collee in BC
said

Mike Huderna: "It's time for independent scientific analysis so that the public knows the full scope of this horrific industry and can make a decision about the kind of future we want to invest in: a toxic legacy or a green economy we can all live and breathe in?" I wonder how Mike gets around. Do you suppose he rides a bicycle? I wonder if he uses any products made from oil. Where does he buy his clothes and food? I bet the stores he shops in get their goods via transportation dependent on the oil industry. Until there are real viable alternatives, we'd all just better learn to make the most of what we have and be grateful.


Carl in the north
said

Guys, the numbers are not what is important here. Whether it's 6, 60 or 6000 birds. It's that Government and industry are distorting the facts - mightily.If they don't want to take the heat because of birds - what else are they hiding from us?Lie little, lie big.


Michelle from MB
said

Unless all the Greenpeace activists go back to: living in houses without electricity, using wood stoves for cooking and heating, growing and raising all their own food, travel by horse and buggy, making all their own clothes, never using a computer, tv or cellphones, etc... I will not respect or trust anything they have to say. They are all hypocrites!


JB in Ontario
said

What about the fish?


Niagara George
said

Eventually, the truth will come out about the actual environmental impact of tar sands oil. In the end, it will make the recent Gulf disaster look like finger paint spilt in the kindergarten sandbox. In the meantime, we'll follow the neoCon mantra of, "Give us more, more, more. Let the grandchildren pay the true costs of our greed and stupidity."


Rick
said

I don't shrug off animal deaths but c'mon. I live in the country on a large hill near lots of trees and at least 10-15 birds die every year from hitting my my windows. The house cats in your city kill more than that.


Ben
said

I do understand that we need oil, there's just no way around it right now, and to get our oil from our own land rather than from another country is (or at least should be) the most reliable way to insure it is done in the best possible way. That being said however, moving beyond these toxic tailings ponds and reducing the overall impact of the oil sands absolutely must be at the forefront for all of us. I live in Alberta and while I enjoy the economic benefits the oil sands have provided, I also am frusterated by what seems to be a disconnect between the "facts" that are being thrown at us. While I have no reason to hold a higher credence of a 3rd party of my elected government, I also believe in erring on the side of caution in cases such as this and I am beginning to think we need to improve our extraction and processing technologies before we go forward with more development in our oil sands.


Albertaboy111
said

The government lied to us so that negative attention would not be drawn to a controversial program that many people in the world are very against, but makes lots of money for the friends of that very same government? Say it ain't so...


Bernie Boyes
said

the information in this article are rediculous. I worked in, around and on the tailings ponds for over 14 years and never saw a dead bird. Do you know that thousands of humans are starving to death every day, are you doing anything about that? I am!


The Greatest Environmentalis that has Ever Lived
said

I work up here in Fort McMurray, and I don't get what all the fuss is about...I look at us as the greatest environmentalists of all time, cleaning up mother natures largest oil spill!


Roger
said

I would like to see a study done on how many birds die each year from wind turbines, the so called green power? I bet it is a lot more than the oil sands...


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Top Stories

An interpretive trail and viewing platform overlooking glaciers along the Icefields Parkway in Jasper National Park, shown in this artist's rendition. Environment Minister Peter Kent is giving a green light to a controversial glacier-walk project in Alberta's Jasper National Park. (Brewster Travel Canada)

Controversial Jasper Park 'glacier walk' to go ahead

More   7 Comments 7  

RCMP looking for Sawyer Clarke Robison, 27, considered a person of interest in shootings of two of RCMP members.

Search continues for man connected to RCMP shootings

More  4 Video(s) 4

Canadians rescued, sailors, Left to right: Mitchell, 29, West, 9, and Bradley James, 32, address media following their rescue off the coast of Hawaii, Thursday, Feb. 9, 2012.

Three Canadian sailors rescued off coast of Hawaii

More   12 Comments 12    5 Video(s) 5