Top Stories -   

1
Medical

Quebec to hold public hearings on assisted suicide

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV Montreal: Rob Lurie on the hearings
Quebecers will delve into the thorny and emotionally charged debate over euthanasia and assisted suicide this week as public hearings into dying with dignity get underway. Rob Lurie reports.
CTV News Channel: Kerry Bowman, professor
A professor of bioethics at the University of Toronto discusses euthanasia. He says it is incredibly important to have public debates on euthanasia, as it is long overdue. He adds there is an increasing number of Canadians who seem to be supportive of euthanasia.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (21) Facebook   

Medical

Photos

Medical

View Larger Image

Date: Mon. Sep. 6 2010 6:46 PM ET

MONTREAL — Quebecers will delve into the thorny and emotionally charged debate over euthanasia and assisted suicide this week as public hearings into dying with dignity get underway.

A committee of provincial politicians has heard from experts and it will now be the public's turn in discussions that promise to be polarizing and emotional, said Geoff Kelley, a Liberal overseeing the hearings.

"We'll be looking at the question of dignity for the end of life and that's very important," Kelley said in an interview.

"But obviously it leads you on to the minefield of . . . euthanasia and . . . assisted suicide that probably were last raised in the early '90s when Sue Rodriguez's case went forward and was debated before the courts."

In 1992, assisted suicide hit the national radar when Rodriguez, a B.C. woman, fought all the way to the Supreme Court of Canada for the right to kill herself.

Rodriguez, who suffered from Lou Gehrig's disease, lost 5-4 in a split decision, but killed herself anyway with the help of an unidentified physician in 1994.

Since then, the issue has surfaced from time to time. A Quebec man, Stephan Dufour, was found not guilty by a jury of helping his uncle commit suicide in 2008 in the first ever Canadian assisted suicide case to make it to trial.

The verdict has been appealed by the Crown.

Kelley said the time is right to ask the public about euthanasia (where someone other than the patient ends the patient's life) and assisted suicide (when someone aids a patient to end their own life.)

Kelley stresses the committee hasn't come to any conclusions and is eager to listen to the public on discussions on refusal of treatment and new medications.

Some 300 written and oral submissions from the public are expected as the hearings begin in Montreal on Tuesday, while another 3,300 citizens have filled out an online questionnaire.

In February, the commission heard from 32 legal and medical experts and organizations.

Euthanasia and assisted suicide are illegal in Canada and, barring a dramatic change in Ottawa, these hearings won't change that.

In Ottawa last April, Bloc Quebecois MP Francine Lalonde's attempt to introduce a private member's bill to allow euthanasia in certain circumstances was soundly defeated 228-59.

But in Quebec, organizations representing doctors have been outspoken about changes to laws governing euthanasia. That and Opposition interest at the legislature helped create these widespread consultations.

Gaetan Barrette, head of the province's association of medical specialists, told the hearings last winter that doctors in Quebec want euthanasia legalized in "exceptional circumstances" and want the Criminal Code amended to reflect that.

Barrette went as far as to say that euthanasia goes on currently in a grey area whereby painkillers given to terminally ill patients sometimes result in death.

Quebec's College of Physicians has also said euthanasia should be considered in the case of an "imminent or inevitable death," as long as the patient consents.

But not all doctors are in agreement. And anti-euthanasia groups worry the hearings are simply a ploy to get around Ottawa's balking at new laws by lumping euthanasia in as a medical issue.

Linda Couture, director of Living With Dignity, said moving toward legalizing euthanasia is a slippery slope which may lead to premature deaths.

"It is (currently) a crime, it is unacceptable and it is dangerous," Couture said.

"What we need is to inform people of what their real choices are and focus on developing a good, sound, end-of-life care with palliative care which is already there but not enough people have access to."

Couture said acceptance of assisted suicide remains rare. Luxembourg and the Netherlands are believed to be the only places in the world where both euthanasia and assisted suicide are legal.

Assisted suicide is legal in Belgium and three U.S. states, but under strict conditions.

Pro-euthanasia groups argue that people should have control over how they die.

"It's not right to let someone die alone," said Helene Bolduc, a former nurse who heads the Association quebecoise pour le droit de mourir dans la dignite, a right-to-die group.

"It's not right to say at the end of one's life, you're on your own."

Bolduc says palliative care is acceptable in many cases but doesn't necessarily work all the time.

"There's not a ton of people asking for (help in dying) but many do ask that doctors do something at the very end, so what counts for us is recognizing this right," Bolduc said.

"People find euthanasia to be criminal. I find leaving someone to suffer to be criminal."

Comments are now closed for this story

dawn
said
0 0

to those religious people that believe only god has the right to kill you: i am an atheist. until such a time as you can prove to me the existence of a god, then let the individual make the decision for him/herself.


M2
said
0 0

We have no right to play GOD with life, we will die when it is our true time to go


B in Quebec
said
0 0

In Quebec assisted suicide has been happening for many many years but it is something that has been dealt with quietly and with respect. A few people in my family have peacefully gone through assisted suicide offered by the doctors in the hospital. If you are dying a painful death, why not have the right to end the pain it is causing you and your family. This is another subject that should only be your decision and no one elses business.


Wade Ens
said
0 0

If someone has aids they should be able to end it with all the help we can give them. Rather than have them suffer.


Craig
said
0 0

Michael, your views and beliefs on euthanasia and relgion are not the views held by everyone. A person should be allowed to have the ability to die with dignitiy and not "live with indignity". I understand that this is a personal matter to everyone and everyone has their own opinion. I as an Emergency Nurse, know all to well the emotional strain on the patient, family and health care professionals must go through on a daily basis when treatment is withheld. Trust me, nothing is harder to go through and the desicion to withhold treatment is carefully thoughout.


Trevor in the Hat
said
0 0

Aren't church and state supposed to be seperate? Why is it everyone always wants to make their own particular religious beliefs into law for everyone. For those sayig assisted suicide and/or euthenasia are morally and religiously wrong, simply make it your OWN choice not to participate. Don't bring youe religion into the law as I and others may not share the same beliefs.


Diane Rogers
said
0 0

Who are these people who want to impose their Godless morality on the majority who are of our Canadian Judeo-Christian culture? These biblically illiterate folk are completely unaware just how much of our civilized society was shaped and formed on biblical principles. Assisted suicide is murder by two people and it is wrong plain and simple.


oddmelllee
said
0 0

it is the person who has no quality of life left to make this decision--- i go with mike on this one --


J.R.KENNY---Calgary, Alberta
said
0 0

It used to be a criminal offence to attempt suicide. It was removed from the Criminal Code about 30 years ago. The government said, "You people are on your own. If you want to commit suicide--go ahead." If 'A' has a right to commit suicide so does 'B" but 'B' needs some help to maintain his/her equality in a democratic society.


Doomed to have Alzheimer’s
said
0 0

I watched as my grandmother withered away, slowly and painfully from Alzheimer’s. This was journey though the depths of hell for everyone that took almost 15 years, eventually dying from starvation. The most horrid thing to watch and feel was her lucid moments, rare, but still there even the day before she died, knowing what was happening to her, knowing she was trapped in her mind. Her last words to my mother for months were I WANT TO DIE over and over again those 4 words. Yet because of the laws all she could do is suffer, trapped in her own mind and decrepit body, not even able to express her pain. I sincerely hope the law changes before my mother is diagnosed (the signs are already there). Knowing what is coming this time around how much worse will it before her?

Prof. Pye Chartt
said
0 0

In light of the "shy" thumbs-down crowd (who, evidently, aren't comfortable in, competent to, and/or capable of, tabling their positional argument), I feel compelled to add that they are morally corrupt in wanting to overrule one's own last wish.


Mike
said
0 0

Only with the Patient's written consent, taken 3 times within a week of each other, so they have a chance to re-consider. If they confirm 3 times in 3 weeks period they want to do it, let them do it.


lz in Edmonton
said
0 0

I still feel that Assisted suicide and the like is a slipperly slope issue. HOWEVER, after seeing some family and friends deal with aging parents with certain types of mental diseases where all that is left is a SHELL of a human being, I have to ask myself, why are we spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on a piece of flesh that doesn't think, talk, feel or for that matter, contribute anything but hardship for the family and society? As a large portion of the population enters retirement, we will NOT have the resources nore the people to care for all the cases of severe Alz, Parkinsons, and dementia. The governments have NOT addressed even todays shortfalls so how are we going to go forward?


Kat
said
0 0

We'll end our pet's suffering but we'll watch our parents suffer for years. Obviously this makes sense right? Bible thumpers need to back off so that we can change the laws. If your belief requires you to suffer a long drawn out death to get you into some imaginary gates then all the power to you. But don't push whatever you believe on the rest of us.

Michael
said
0 0

Suicide is the act of self-murder. Assisting someone commit murder is no different than murder itself. When God carved the ten commandments in stone and handed then to Moses he never rescinded His commandment for us not to murder. Much as we utterly hate the pain and the agony some people go through and want to reach out to them with compassion, we shouldn't assist them commit self murder. We do not have the moral or spiritual right to help someone take their own life. Death in these cases may not necessarily the end of the agony if we have the right understanding of what God teaches regarding life itself and eternity. I realize many people don't want to know God of honor Him but that does not negate or make it the truth.


elisa
said
0 0

I am a PSW and I give palliative care. I haven't come across anyone asking for help to die but if they do I think they should have the right to end their suffering. I think the decision should be the person who is dying and suffering and the family should have that right as well (so long they aren't waiting to inherit or benefit somehow from that person's death). Not everyone can die the way they want, we already have DNR's in place, how is assisted suicide any different?I was with a client who passed away in his home surrounded by people who loved him, he was 86 with end stage Parkinson's, but it was cancer that he died from... And he suffered but he chose to die the way he wanted to and he was lucky to have the care he had. Not many are as fortunate as him and they should have the right to end their life the way they want. Many people say only God has that right or know when your time will be up...how does anyone know that? The fact that they are terminally ill should be proof enough that their time is up...so what if they decide to end their suffering sooner??? It isn't our right impose our will on them. We have the patient Bill of Rights, what about our right to free will to decide our fates...I think the gov't controls us enough as it is...they need to stay out of this one...just make sure people aren't murdered because just found out they have cancer and don't want to face the battle...I don't think I would want to commit assisted suicide if I found out I had a terminal disease that will cause a lot of pain..then again...who knows...


Martin
said
0 0

Quebec is the only province in Canada with any kahoonas.


realist
said
0 0

Euthanasia is a topic that must continue to be discussed. I personally feel that we treat our animals better than we do our people. If our pets are suffering and their quality of life is non-existent, we end their suffering for them. Obviously there needs to be rules and boundaries in place, but in the end, if you've ever watched a person you love in horrible wretched pain, gasping for air and begging for death, you know that euthanasia is something that should be an option.

viral venus
said
0 0

How you leave the world at the end of your life is a very personal decision and not everyone relishes clinging to every last painful breath. Please note PERSONAL decision so all you third party intervenors and other ideological interferers step back, mind your own business and leave the dying and their families to sort through their own very personal choices. You should get to make YOUR choice eventually, but ONLY YOURS and not everyone elses. First improve end of life care and pain management so that fewer people suffer horrendus pain and distress but then allow for those who want to expire before their physical demise is naturally complete to medical receive assistance. It's about time someone reopened this legitimate and important dicussion as many people are taking control at the end of life but don't have the legal protection they should enjoy.


Prof. Pye Chartt
said
0 0

Yep. Genuine ownership of your body and your life. Anything less is moral corruption.


ron
said
0 0

It's about time. Oregon (since l997, physician-assisted suicide only); 2. Switzerland (1941, physician and non-physician assisted suicide only); 3. Belgium (2002, permits 'euthanasia' but does not define the method; 4. Netherlands (voluntary euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide lawful since April 2002 but permitted by the courts since l984).


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Top Stories

A pickup truck passes a mining shovel at an oil sands mine near Fort McMurray, Alta., in this July 9, 2008 photo. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jeff McIntosh

Feds, Alberta to boost monitoring of oilsands

More   20 Comments 20    5 Video(s) 5

Delta Lambda Phi President Michael Dalimonte and Founding President Sam Reisler appear on CTV News Channel on Friday, Feb. 3, 2012.

First gay fraternity in Canada launches at McGill

More  1 Video(s) 1