Top Stories -   

1

Vuvuzelas banned from Euro 2012, Champions League

A soccer supporter, silhouetted by the moon, blows a vuvuzela at Royal Bafokeng Stadium in Rustenburg, South Africa on Saturday, June 26, 2010. (AP / Guillermo Arias)
A soccer supporter, silhouetted by the moon, blows a vuvuzela at Royal Bafokeng Stadium in Rustenburg, South Africa on Saturday, June 26, 2010. (AP / Guillermo Arias)

View Larger Image

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (19) Facebook   

Date: Wednesday Sep. 1, 2010 5:30 PM ET

NYON, Switzerland — The honking plastic horns that caused such an uproar at the World Cup have been shut out of Champions League and European Championship qualifying matches.

UEFA issued a ban Wednesday that prevents fans from bringing vuvuzelas into the stadium at any match it organizes in the continent's 53 soccer nations. The governing body of European soccer said it made the decision to protect the culture and tradition of fans singing at matches from the "negative effect" of South Africa's signature musical contraption.

"UEFA feels that the instrument's widespread use would not be appropriate in Europe," the organization said in a statement.

South Africa's response? A respectful rejection of European values.

"We believe that UEFA has the right to decide what goes on in their games, but we believe that they are wrong," World Cup organizing committee spokesman Rich Mkhondo told The Associated Press.

"They should not be so rigid about the future ways in which people like to express themselves," Mkhondo said in a telephone interview from South Africa. "We will forever cherish the way South Africans and Africans and even the visitors who came from around the world embraced vuvuzelas."

South Africa's defiant stance was backed by FIFA, which defended vuvuzelas as an important part of the host nation's soccer culture.

"I have always said that Africa has a different rhythm, a different sound," FIFA president Sepp Blatter said in a Twitter message on the fourth day of the World Cup. "I don't see banning the music traditions of fans in their own country."

FIFA refused to ban vuvuzelas despite repeated calls from players, who said on-field communication was lost in the din, and broadcasters who feared viewers were turned off by the low-pitch drone likened to a swarm of buzzing bees.

Yet the UEFA embargo follows bans issued by organizers of basketball's world championship and baseball's Little League World Series, plus most English Premier League clubs.

UEFA did at least acknowledge Wednesday that vuvuzelas have a place in world soccer culture, if not Europe's.

"In the specific context of South Africa, the vuvuzela adds a touch of local flavour and folklore," the organization said.

"(However) the magic of soccer consists of the two-way exchange of emotions between the pitch and the stands, where the public can transmit a full range of feelings to the players," UEFA said. "UEFA is of the view that the vuvuzelas would completely change the atmosphere, drowning supporter emotions and detracting from the experience of the game."

The ban will take effect when qualifying for Euro 2012 begins on Friday, and when the group stage of the Champions League and Europa League starts in two weeks.

European broadcasters, many of whom developed sound filters during the World Cup to try to control the vuvuzela noise, will likely be delighted by the ban. Valuable television rights deals help to ensure that the Champions League earns more than a billion dollars in commercial revenue each season.

The European Broadcasting Union, a Geneva-based umbrella group of mainly state-owned channels, declined comment on Wednesday.

Vuvuzelas also have been opposed on health as well as taste grounds.

FIBA cited medical advice when it banned them from the basketball world championship, which is currently being played in Turkey. It said the "controversial instruments" emitted a 120-decibel noise in indoor arenas which could permanently damage the hearing of players and spectators, and have a "direct negative impact" on the game by making it difficult for referees to communicate.

In South Africa, Mkhondo pointed to the inclusion of "vuvuzela" in the Oxford Dictionary of English as proof of a global phenomenon.

"This World Cup will be remembered in many ways," Mkhondo said. "One will be the emergence of vuvuzelas as celebratory instruments."

Comments are now closed for this story

jay
said

such a shame that the tv stations, who can turn down the background noise to everything else they tape, couldn't manage to turn down the volume of the vuvuzelas. Interesting when you think about it..... i wonder why....


Jim
said

Gee, How interesting. Something from a certain culture which is not acceptable by the masses from other cultures. On one hand, reasonably put forward, politely explained then acted upon democratically and finally. On the other, not fully in agreement yet understanding, carrying on their preferred standards as makes their own culture happy and not pushing their will outside the sphere of their influence. If this carries on there might be some hope for us all yet.


Ekhaya
said

Let the fans chooseWho gives FIFA, FIBA, etc, the right to dictate what fans should do at the games? The fact that the organizations are banning the vuvuzelas shows that fans do indeed wantt to bring them to the games. So let them. There are worse things that should be banned like smoking and drinking at the games! Grow up!A prospective South African


Tono
said

rick and Earthwatcher both got it right man.


DanK
said

Once I got used to the sound, I actually didn't mind the sound of the vuvuzelas during the world cup. The sounds were better than listening to a drunken mob hurling insults at the players or the opposing fans.Which noise is more civilized or appropriate, depends on your tastes, I guess. The cries to ban an African horn sounds pretty racists overall, but then again we are talking about European football here.


Johnny
said

Biarrote you are so right - so many people I spoke to, are also of the same opinion. The noise almost boggled the mind - it wasn't worth it. Like you I sometimes relied on the newspaper reports for the results, and really lacked any further interest. In fact while typing this comment, I was trying to recall who won, and failed.


Come On People
said

These plastic things have NOTHING to do with S. African Heritage...we've been using them at CFL games since the late 70's for crying out loud. What a crock!!


GRB
said

Bravo to UEFA for banning fans from bringing vuvuzelas into stadiums . They are a detriment also a distraction to the game , the play and the players . No doubt useful in the jungle


mandosa
said

I think this is wrong. Somebody somewhere might be offended.


D in SK
said

FIFA, Thank you! Now, can we add some technology to the sport???? I'm tired of the diving and the terrible calls from the ref's... including non-existent goals or blunt offsides. In fact, they should've instated cameras and replays ever since the infamous Hand of God goal by Maradona. Take this sport out of the dark ages!!!


Sober, Newmarket
said

Common sense at last! (Seems to be in very short supply these days)


Wade
said

People watch soccer..?


CYL
said

WONDERFUL NEWS !!! hated the aweful sound of those things, keep them in South Africa where they belong.


Edb(Hamilton)
said

THANK YOU!!!!!Now I can view in peace.ps. qualifiers start Friday.pss. Spain won.


Earthwatcher
said

A sensible decision...it will always be linked to the South African experience, the droning that rose and fell with the intensity of the match. However, it has no place in a European match with the decades old tradition of singing support songs. That is as much the right of the fans as anything. Support it!


Biarrote
said

I tried and tried and tried to watch the World Cup. Every time after a few minutes and sometimes even less, I couldn't stand the background noise. In the end, I got the results the old fashioned way : by newspapers. So it is more than welcomed that these vuvuzelas are banned from other venues. Hurray for the people standing behind this decision. HURRAY, HURRAY, HURRAY.


rick
said

When in Rome.......


Paul ~ Kitchener
said

Horray Horray for sanity and intelligent thinking.Now come up with the muscle to ensure this ruling.There will be those morons, who will disobey the rule, just for publicity, and news coverage.Make the punishment a "Banishment", from atending any future matches ~ ANYWHERE !A nice on the spot fine of $150 euro's would also enforce the rule.


Brent
said

Thank you FIBA! The voice of reason rings loud and clear. Now if FIFA would just follow suit.

By the way, who won the world cup? I didn't think you remembered either. All we remember is those annoying vuvuzelas.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Top Stories

A police officer removes a package containing a human foot from the Conservative Party headquarters in Ottawa on Tuesday, May 29, 2012. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Police probe body parts in Ottawa, torso in Montreal

More   4 Comments 4    5 Video(s) 5

Hacking

Official claims Iran has defeated powerful 'Flame' virus

More   12 Comments 12    1 Video(s) 1

Vic Toews, Public Safety Minister, and Jason Kenney, Minister of Citizenship, make an announcement related to terrorism research funding during a press conference in the foyer of the House of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Wednesday, May 30, 2012. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Ottawa pledges $1.1M to counter-terrorism research

More    Comments  

Most Talked about Stories

While Branson's comments (and activities) are arrogant in a million different ways, Clark's response was admirable. She kept her sense of humour with her joke about Branson's brand-name and his bad pick-up line, showing why humour is often the best response to arrogance.

D Austin (Fredericton)

B.C. premier rebuffs Branson's naked kitesurfing invite