Top Stories -   

1
The inside of the production facility at the Rocanville potash mine owed by the PotashCorp, is shown in this 2007 file photo in Rocanville, Sask. (Troy Fleece / THE CANADIAN PRESS) Aussie company makes offer to Potash shareholders.

Mining firm sends Potash takeover bid to shareholders

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV News Channel: BNN's Brett Harris explains
A correspondent with BNN says the Potash Corporation has made significant gains, which may spark a bidding war given that the price per share is still well above US$130 that BHP is offering.
CTV News Channel: BNN's Michael Kane on Potash
Takover talk surrounding Potash has sent markets soaring, and Australian mining giant BHP Billiton is now taking their rejected offer for Potash directly to the shareholders.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (16) Facebook   

The inside of the production facility at the Rocanville potash mine owed by the PotashCorp, is shown in this 2007 file photo in Rocanville, Sask. (Troy Fleece / THE CANADIAN PRESS) Aussie company makes offer to Potash shareholders.

Photos

The inside of the production facility at the Rocanville potash mine owed by the PotashCorp, is shown in this 2007 file photo in Rocanville, Sask. (Troy Fleece / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

View Larger Image

Date: Wed. Aug. 18 2010 6:56 PM ET

An Australian mining giant said Wednesday it will take its US$38.6-billion cash offer for Saskatchewan-based PotashCorp directly to shareholders after the fertilizer company rejected the hostile takeover bid as tantamount to "stealing the company."

BHP Billiton said in a statement on its website that it believes the offer will appeal to PotashCorp shareholders.

"We firmly believe that PotashCorp shareholders will find the certainty of a cash offer, at a premium of 32 per cent ... very attractive," company chairman Jac Nasser said in the statement.

PotashCorp, formally known as the Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan, denounced the BHP bid Tuesday as far too low to even form the basis for serious negotiations.

"Our board determined that the price that we were offered was completely inadequate and undervalued the company very severely," PotashCorp president and chief executive Officer Bill Doyle told The Canadian Press Tuesday.

"We just think it totally missed the boat and we wouldn't speculate on a price that would be acceptable."

The offer of US$130 per share from BHP -- the world's biggest mining company -- was 16 per cent above Monday's price for PotashCorp stock on the Toronto Stock Exchange but news of the offer sent share prices leaping more than 25 per cent to C$147.34.

BNN's Michael Kane said the industry consensus is that the bid was too low and that the soaring price of PotashCorp stock means traders expect a bidding war to erupt over the company.

"Potash Corp's stock price shot up more than 25 per cent and added more than $10-billion to the company's market value," he told CTV News Channel. "The stock rose to $147.34 in New York and that suggests that investors expect another bid from either BHP or another company."

Kane said the stock price may rise as high as $165 per share, if other potential corporate suitors enter the bidding.

"That would take the value of the deal to just under $49 billion US. That would make it the largest takeover in this country's history."

But Marius Kloppers, BHP chief executive officer, told analysts Wednesday that his company has the only offer on the table and suggested it would be a tough one to beat.

"It is a large transaction and, particularly, I do point at the fact that it's all cash in our case. With markets being volatile, that is a different value proposition to somebody that may offer some other mix of consideration."

Kloppers didn't elaborate on what he meant by "some other mix of consideration" but a rival might offer to pay in shares or some form of debt that provides interest payments or a combination of cash, debt and stock.

"We are long-standing good citizens in Canada with a long track record of excellent achievement in things like aboriginal employment, communities, environment and the way we do things," Kloppers added.

Among BHP's holdings is the Ekati diamond mine, 310 kilometres northeast of Yellowknife. It also bought Athabasca Potash Inc. earlier this year.

Doyle said the BHP bid doesn't come even close to the true, long-term value of PotashCorp's assets but added the company would not shy away from a deal if the price was right.

"We're not opposed to a sale, but we don't want anyone stealing the company."

PotashCorp is the world's largest producer of potash with about 20 per cent of the world's production capacity.

The company was created by the provincial government in 1975 and was privatized in 1989. Legislation dictates that PotashCorp shall maintain its head office in Saskatchewan.

Despite its Saskatchewan roots, PotashCorp is already largely foreign owned. Nearly 40 per cent of the company's shareholders are based in the United States, with another 35 per cent or more held in various other countries.

In its bid, BHP said it is committed to being a "strong corporate citizen in Saskatchewan, New Brunswick and Canada."

It said its submission to Investment Canada would include an intention to base the president and management of the Canadian potash operations in Saskatchewan.

BHP Billiton also said Wednesday it plans to maintain current job levels at PotashCorp's Saskatchewan and New Brunswick operations "for the foreseeable future" and intends to propose a Canadian nominee to sit on the BHP Billiton Board.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper declined to comment on the deal, other than to point out that many major foreign acquisitions of Canadian companies are subject to federal review.

"Obviously, as I say, the takeover in question here at the moment has not yet happened, and when it does happen, as I say, officials will review it," Harper said in Toronto. "It would not be appropriate for me to comment on a commercial transaction that might be reviewed by government officials."

Here are some of the largest recent takeovers of Canadian companies:

  • Aluminum producer Alcan Ltd., by Anglo-Australian miner Rio Tinto for US$38.1 billion
  • Nickel miner Falconbridge Ltd., by Swiss-based Xstrata PLC for C$24.8 billion
  • Petro-Canada, by Suncor Energy Inc. (TSX:SU) for C$19.2 billion
  • Nickel producer Inco Ltd., by Brazil's CVRD (now known as Vale) for C$19 billion
  • Placer Dome, by Barrick Gold (TSX:ABX) for US$10.3 billionGlamis Gold, by Goldcorp (TSX:G) for US$8.7 billion
  • Shell Canada Ltd., by Royal Dutch Shell for C$8.7 billion
  • Red Back Mining Inc. (TSX:RBI), by Kinross Gold Corp. (TSX:K) for US$7.1 billion
  • Gas utility and pipeline company Terasen Inc., by Kinder Morgan for C$6.9 billion
  • LionOre Mining International Ltd., by Norilsk Nickel for C$6.8 billion
  • ATI Technologies Inc., by Advanced Micro Devices Inc. for US$6.2 billion
  • Steelmaker Dofasco, by Arcelor for C$5.3 billion

Comments are now closed for this story

james
said

Why are we always the hunted and not the hunters.... and do you think countries like Brazil would not block the sale of Vale if the shoe was on the other foot? I do not believe that the international business community would shun Canada for foreign investment if Harper blocked this potential sale of Potash Corp. It should remain in Canadian hands as a pillar of one of the last world class Canadian- owned resource companies.


Lorne
said

Grim - I haven't seen you're comments on this topic yet.I do know that the Potash Corporation is privatized.The key here is how many shares the Provincial government has in the corporation.Approximately 13 million shares were sold to private investors when the company was privatized. Does the Government of Saskatchewan still own shares in the corporation? If so, then it becomes a concern for Saskatchewan taxpayers.The Province would then receive dividends on the shares it still owns. These would be lost if sold and no more income coming in which the Government could use towards it's budget.Royalities - we still would get royalties, but the royalty structure could be changed at any time.You very seldom see an increase in the royalty structure, but see more of a reduction.Foreign ownership will push for a reduction in the royalty structure - you can bet on it.Less money for the Province to spend on different programs. @Grim - where is the benefit to the Province? You obviously own shares from your statement and could care less.


Rick in NB, Ste Marie
said

@ Proff Pye Chartt, the only thing that matters, is the workers harvesting potash will be Canadians paying Canadian taxes. Foreigners controling more and more of our natural resources, is a just another by product of having a new reformed conservative government.


Doug # BC
said

I think "PBW" has it figured out right.The people who own the sahres are the ones who decide whether or not to sell them.The value is there for Canadians to buy if they wish.Sadly,time has shown that most Canadians are to risk averse to invest in anything bigger than a "Big Mac" or a giant screen TV set.If foreign ownership is a problem for you,invest some of your own money to keep it "Canadian".But I would bet my last dollar that most of the shares are already owned by foreign investors. Yes,we can defend Canada's interests.But the interests we can defend,are the royalties paid to government.Not the ownership of the shares. These are assets owned privately,by indivduals who have every right to sell them.The only people with a right to whine about it are the people who are willing to put their money where their mouths are,and actually buy the shares.


spaz
said

As an active producer of corn, wheat, and soybeans, I am not pleased with the news of consolidation in the fertilizer business.As the agriculture based companies consolidate higher prices are not far off. Take Monsanto for example; they hold the patent on the genetic modificaion "roundup ready". Our seed costs have gone up drastically. Monsanto bought a large seed company and then extracts huge royalties from the other seed companies....bottom line....higher priced seed.The we go to the grain handling sector. Less than 10 companies handle 75% of the worlds coarse grain movements.Take beef......did you know Cargill ( also big in grain ) owns the controlling interest in the former Better Beef facility in Guelph........that plant represents 80% of the slaughter capacity in eastern canada.....processing 1400 animals daily. They also have a plant at High River Alberta that is even larger.Starting to see a trend......the worlds food supply is being controlled by fewer and fewer hands......and they are driven by PROFIT.


PBW
said

It's interesting to note that some posters object to Canadian industry being bought up by foreigners. Do they object to foreign businesses being bought up by Canadians? I've never heard that in the news. As for the mines, they will stay in Canada, and royalties will be paid to the Federal and Provincial governments. If shareholders decide to sell and make a profit, it is their choice. If they choose not to sell, they will still get their dividends. As for the board of directors, they are the only ones who will lose out, as it is unlikely they will be kept on. Business is business, and in the case of a mine, unlike manufacturing, the production facility cannot be moved overseas, so all that is involved is a few papers signed and money changing hands. Of course, the biggest beneficiaries are the "advisors" who have nothing at stake!


Prof. Pye Chartt
said

Rick in NB, Ste Marie: You're missing that legislation mandates that the company's corporate HEAD OFFICE shall remain in Saskatchewan. It could be located anywhere, otherwise. Hence the lawful requirement.

Slewhigh Yendick
said

It is within my memory when the entire business world treated Saskatchewan as if it were full of the black plague !!Allan Blackney had 'nationalized" the potash industry and kicked out all foreign companies. This communist move put mining in Saskatchewan into a tailspin that only now seems to be on the verge of recovery.After all these years ,,I certainly hope the dippers don't prvail.....


J.S.
said

Another nail in the Canadian coffin. This country has more natural resources than any other, and yet it is all foreign owned. We can wave all the flags we like, tell the world how important hockey and curling are, put on a big patriotic show for our dead soldiers, while other nations make a concious effort to to control our wealth. I suspect that seizure of our natural resources and strategic industries is just a prelude to our losing vast areas of resource rich territory to foreign governments. Our nations future has been sold by successive governments, and it is too late now. Just remmember that we had the second highest reserves of oil, the second highest reserves of nickel, the third highest reserves of copper, the most uranium, the most platinum, palladium, rhodium... I could go on and on. It's gone. The people we have entrusted with this country for the past 40 years have let foreigners take it. The people who built this country, toiled in the fields, cleared forests, ran furs, and died in the mines must be pretty proud of us.


Rick in NB, Ste Marie
said

The list of recent buyouts looks like a great stock portfolio. And, leave it to prof pye chartt to be the first to figure out that mines have to stay where they are dug. There chould be some research grant money in this for you pye.


Craig from AB
said

I service Agrium and have done so for years. This event is largely unexpected as there are two businesses that will dominate the business news in the next decade - what to eat (and what goes into producing food) and what to use for energy.Canada sits in powerful position on both accounts. The world population grows - ergo both food and energy provided the means to support the global population. Our petrol veins will continue to deliver the fuel to the the US (and the rest of the world as Statoil, Total, Chinoco etc take a greater hold). As Canada is the largest politically stable source for technology and resources in the G8, I hope that Canadians appreciate what they have. The next move will be further industrial scale farming in Canada, supported by our leading technology for food production. Watch the agribusiness manufacturers for the next takeovers.And if Iggy and Co (or the dreaded coalition of Iggy, Moe and Curly) - expect the Canadian Wheat Board to be up for sale as well.I believe our current leadership has the wherewithal to understand our position of importance. I sincerely believe that we need to ensure that our resources are used and owned with Canadian interests in mind. Funny - in the last century wars were fought over resources like ours. Our civilized society negotiates for resources. Good thing - we could have been China in the late 30's!


Jim in Ottawa
said

According to my valuations, the company is worth at least $46.9 billion. I would encourage the shareholders to reject the offer. BHP must put up at least another $10 billion to make this offer viable.


Tyler
said

I would hate to see Potash Corp sell for the simple reason that the long term worth of the company and by extension the economic benefit to Saskatchewan is far greater than any take over bid any company can make. It's in shareholders best economic interests to not sell as a steady return over your lifetime always out weights a small lump sum.


Intelligent Liberal
said

Most people don't know that potash means pot ash, the ash leftover in a pot.Regardless, Harper has gone too far this time, selling off Saskatchewan to a bunch of kangeroo eating Australians.


Investor in Vancouver
said

The Canadian public must understand the importance of potash used in fertilizer to grow our food (and food around the world). As the population increases and as the arable land supply diminishes, the demand and need for fertilizer will grow exponentially. BHP has offered to buy Potash Saskatchewan because they know the value will double in the next 10 to 15 years. Canada, do not sell this valuable resource and do not allow a foreign entity to own it.


Prof. Pye Chartt
said

Thank heavens national cultural food icon BeaverTails pastries is still in Canadian hands. Potash doesn't taste that great, so, I'm not going to mourn the loss of the company. It's already largely foreign-owned anyway, and will remain in Saskatchewan regardless of the outcome of any bidding war. (Our federal government will rubber-stamp any deal.) ...Maybe I'l call my broker this morning, regarding the stock.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Top Stories

Local authorities say the incident at the Deerfield Beach recreational vehicle park began with a shooting early Thursday evening.

Canadian killed in Florida campground shooting

More  1 Video(s) 1

RCMP looking for Sawyer Clarke Robison, 27, considered a person of interest in shootings of two of RCMP members.

Suspect arrested in Alberta RCMP shooting

More  2 Video(s) 2

caterpillar, electro-motive

CAW boss accuses Caterpillar of breaking the rules

More   2 Comments 2  

Most Talked about Stories

I think he was pushed to take matters into his own hands. I have a teenage son and if he was involved with a drug dealer I would be furious and try anything to save him like this father did for his daughter. Why do police often say they can't do anything until it's too late? Whether it be a drug dealer or an abusive spouse, the police can't seem to do anything until something really bad happens. In this case they could have raided the drug dealers home and arrested him. The whole town knew what was going on in that house but yet the police chose to do nothing. Release this man and give him a medal for doing the right thing by his daughter. I can't wait to see the episode on W5, I will certainly be watching this one.

Shelley

W5: How far would you go to save your child?