Top Stories -   

1

UN: Afghan civilian deaths rise sharply

Afghan security force soldiers rush to the scene of a militant attack in Kabul, Afghanistan on Tuesday, Aug. 10, 2010. (AP / Musadeq Sadeq) An Afghan boy walks for collecting empty bottles in Kabul, Afghanistan on Tuesday, Aug 10, 2010. (AP / Musadeq Sadeq) Afghanistan
Afghan security force soldiers rush to the scene of a militant attack in Kabul, Afghanistan on Tuesday, Aug. 10, 2010. (AP / Musadeq Sadeq)

View Larger Image

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (22) Facebook   

Date: Tuesday Aug. 10, 2010 9:14 PM ET

The number of Afghan civilians killed in the war torn country rose 25 per cent in the first six months of 2010, despite a reduction in the number of civilian deaths caused by NATO action, a UN report said Tuesday.

The report showed that the Afghan war is getting even more deadly because of insurgent actions against civilians, undermining coalition efforts to improve security in the country.

"The human cost of this conflict is unfortunately rising," Staffan De Mistura, the top UN envoy in Afghanistan, said while releasing the report. "We are very concerned about the future because the human cost is being paid too heavily by civilians. This report is a wake-up call."

According to the report by the Human Rights Unit of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan, 1,271 Afghans died and 1,997 were injured, mostly in bombings -- in the first six months of 2010.

In comparison, there were 1,013 civilian deaths in the first six months of 2009.

The UN said insurgents were responsible for 72 per cent of those deaths in 2010, compared to 58 per cent in 2009.

Even though the UN blames insurgents for almost three-quarters of the deaths, the report could undermine the mission as the Afghan public is increasingly blaming the U.S.-led mission for the violence.

De Mistura argues that the Taliban is hurting its long-term goals by killing so many civilians.

"If they want to be part of a future Afghanistan, they cannot do so over the bodies of so many civilians," de Mistura said. "One day, when unavoidably there will be a discussion about the future of the country, will you want to come to that table with thousands of Afghans, civilians, killed along the road?"

Civilian deaths from coalition actions were down 18 per cent in the first half of 2010. Deaths dropped to 223 from 310 in 2009, mostly due to a decrease in air strikes, the report said.

Air bombings accounted for 31 per cent of civilian deaths caused by pro-government forces.

Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the former NATO commander, introduced strict new rules for air strikes, a policy change his successor, Gen. David Petraeus, has continued.

"Every Afghan death diminishes our cause," Petraeus said in a statement

"We know the measure by which our mission will be judged is protecting the population from harm by either side. We will redouble our efforts to prevent insurgents from harming their neighbors."

With files from The Associated Press

Comments are now closed for this story

norm in ontario
said

Observer said:"are you prepared to have that kind of blood on our hands?"Why is that our fault. The West went in, we failed but our young men and women are still being killed by a barbaric society that will never be anything other than a barbaric society. My 2 cents in this debate is very unpopular, however, it is the same one I have had since the inception of this moronic endeavor. Bring our troops home and let whatever will happen, happen.One person said "We cannot police the world" and I totally agree. We have enough trouble policing our own country, which, in my opinion, is far more important that Afganistan or any other of the "stan"s over there.


MKH
said

Does anyone else wonder what would happen if the money and manpower spent on the Afghanistan mission were redirected to medical care and education(bullying) and homelessness and spousal/child abuse and all the other problems in our country which take lives on a daily basis?We seem focused on solving the problems in distant countries which- not living there-we do not have clear answers to. Would we like to have the Afghanistan government dictate and implement, with use of force, the way our country should be run?Imagine all our children safe at their schools, all medical services accessible to us when we need them, no abuse in relationships, no homelessness- the list goes on, doesn't it?Wish we were doing more at what we are knowledgeable about-


GHW
said

If we pull out, any slaughter of innocent people that happens is not our fault and we can’t be expected to police the world. We didn’t turn these nut cases into murdering opportunists, they did this themselves. The military thinkers may have provoked them however. Fact is we should have never tried to nation build in the Middle East in the first place. After 9-11 we should have simply gone in, killed anybody and anything that even looks like a terrorist and promptly left.


peter in MB
said

If we pull out and the Taliban regain Afghanistan how long will it is before another bin laden leader emerges and starts terrorist training camps for another 9-11 style strike. we already have sleeper cells in Canada. Omar Khadr family


Observer
said

@Sandra...fair enough, people are dying in the cause of making Afghanistan a more livable place, but that will pale in comparison to the SYSTEMATIC slaughter that would follow a full western pullout....are you prepared to have that kind of blood on our hands? Look at the histories of any developed country in the world and see how much sacrifice in human lives was made in attaining that development...we in the west take for granted our way of life, forgetting that generations past paid for it with their blood...


The Other Lowell in BC
said

There is no such thing as finishing anything in Afghanistan. You are dealing with a country that have tremendous resolve to resist. Throughout the history of this country attempted takeovers or control by outsiders has been thwarted. What makes this situation any different. Humanitarian interests aside, already the fighting has been going on longer than the Viet Nam War, I believe and there is no end in sight. Don't see any white flags being waved. Actually, the enemy is digging in its heels and becoming more brazen in their efforts. Also the problem is sometimes hard to distinguish between the enemy and the good guy.


GHW
said

I apologize for coming across to mean spirited at America. I understand that in the past and present America has and does a lot of good around the world and that America is vast mix of all kinds of peoples and agendas. I’m really just upset that such a great country, the light of the free world past is being sucked dry and squandered away by government corruption. Mark my words unless America can begin to undo the wide spread deep rooted corruption within their government they are doomed. They can start by outlawing or at least strictly regulating corporate lobbying.


peter in MB
said

The problem with fighting the Taliban is that they have no uniforms and have no honour. They run and hide amongst the civilians and sometime kill civilians and blame it on the NATO forces. Terrorist are just that, people who try to get their way by instilling fear into civilians. The only way to stop them is for the civilians to stand up and take arms against them.


Mark
said

Some actual good comments here about how a NATO pullout would facilitate a full scale slaughter by the Taliban on the innocent Afghan people. Will the UNstill report on the slaughter of civilians after the Taliban take over? The fact remains that the Taliban are not stronger than before. The use of suicide bombers and IED's mean that the Taliban are losing the war. They cannot hold ground and conduct stand up battles versus NATO and Afghan forces. Instead they turn to terror methods meant to scare the Afghan people and convince gullible westerners that the Afghan people are not worth the effort. I see that the tactic is winning when people start posting idiotic comments like US agenda, "for the oil" and other complete nonsense.


Chris in Kingston
said

I really love how the article is spun away from the fact that 72% of civilian casualties are caused by the Insurgency, and that NATO-related airstrike casualties are down something like 60%. Granted, these are only reported civilian injuries/deaths, but civilians would be more likely to report a NATO strike than Insurgents killing their family. The real number of killings from the Taliban is probably significantly higher.It still boggles the mind why people question why we are there. Proof is in the numbers.


Victorian Kate
said

I think it is worth noting that the Taliban is mainly made up of persons recruited from outside of Afghanistan, such as Pakistan. So, since these are outsiders....why should anyone be willing to grant them any support and comfort. I personally believe that once the Afghan borders can be made secure enough for the local authorities to do the job, and they can police their own country, then it's time to pull out completely. Until then, you simply cannot allow terrorists to win.


CYL
said

Afghanistan is a place of war, those who want to leave should leave, let the rest who want to stay kill each other, eventually there won't be anyone left. But wait, muslim or whoever, a more powerful force will take over and wash them all away.


ATIQUE RAZA
said

I understand the Afghan war a total failure. Afghanistan present generation has been born in war and this is their normal life. Civilians killing either by Taliban or Nato forces has no end in sight until a political settlement is reached. Iraq as per the claims, has been liberated & democratised at the cost of 1 millions civilian deaths but the peace is still illusive. Taliban and Nato are fighting an ideological war which will never end until Nato comes out of the country. The cultural trait of Afghans of not giving up and revenge is something the westerners will never understand.


schpid
said

Actually GHW it was European countries that established borders throughout the Middle East.Believe it or not America was still trying to recover from her own Civil War when the Nation building and territorial expansions in Africa and the Middle East were going on.You canb attack the US as much as you want but when you do try and think of how much the US has actually given the world in technology and yes, humanitarian aid around the world


GHW
said

There is no finishing the job. Afghanistan will never settle down into a relatively peaceful democracy. Whose bright idea was it to try and nation build in the Middle East? Oh yeah American corporations and their puppet politicians. The American leaders making these decisions were mostly interested in gaining a foothold in the Middle East in an attempt to stabilizing oil production. If America spent all their war money on developing alternative energies the world would be a much better place. Too bad the big oil companies and arms manufacturers who profit from the status quoi are in control or the U.S. government. Whether we stay or leave the Middle East is going to get worse not better. Our government better pull out as promised.


Bill in BC
said

The overwhelming majority of the civilian deaths can be attributed to the Taliban terrorists. Stop making excuses for your politics and face facts, terrorists are indiscriminate murderers. Soldiers at least try to limit civilian casualties. I don't see anyone protesting to stop the terrorists....


Frank Hawkins
said

We Canadians are in Afghanistan largely to offset US displeasure over our lack of support for 'Star Wars".We are supporting US imperialism,a hypocritical policy that saw its origins with the 19th century acquisition of the Hawaian islands and the "open door" policy in China.The Afghanistani have always been a tribal people unaccustomed to any long standing effectual central government..People in this area of Asia have evolved their own cultural traditions and mores over thousands of years.We, in the West are at best arrogant in seeking to impose our culture on them and at worst, imperialists seeking economic advantage by doing so.

Doug # BC
said

Well stated "Mark". I have a lkot of issues about how this war has been managed.I have lots of criticisms to level at former president Bush,at the way NATO is organized,at the way former PM Chretien sent under equipped Canadian troops to the front,at how poorly Karzai is doing with his efforts to get more citzens participating in the process,at the loss of lives,at the cost,etc,etc,etc. But the bottom line is that a sudden pullout by NATO would see slaughter,torture and mayhem beyond anything that could be considered as "acceptable consequences".

Chris
said

Humanity at work once again. Why can't the people of the world STOP killing? I'll tell you why, because it's in all our bloodlines. As much as we hate murder, people still think some killing is worth it. Killing is as much a part of humanity as procreation. I for one am sick and tired of these murderers who kill in the name of god. Like the Crusades and the Spanish Inquisition, the Taliban have the idea that if you are not a practicing muslim, you will die!!! We are at war. War means casualties, but Canada as a nation tries it's hardest and best to NOT kill the innocent. I'm not for the extermination of the Taliban people as all humanity has a right to religion. I'm for protecting the non-Taliban from the pressures and torment of the "join us or die" attitudes the Taliban has. Continue the mission, fight for the rights of HUMANITY, fight for the rights for HUMANS to live!!!


Sandra
said

If we pull out they will slaughter the people? Mark it sounds to me that they already are.


SK Freedom Lover
said

So it's the Taliban who's doing most of the kiling and by the way, quite intentionally, unlike NATO...we cannot abandon this country to these murdering zealots...


Mark - Fort Erie, Ont
said

I know this will be an unpopular answer - but if there every was a place that we, Canada, should be, it's in Afganistan. If the West pulls out, the Taliban will slaughter the people there. Females, teachers, aide workers, doctors, any one with a religion other than Muslim, just to name a few. We began a commitment there that has morphed into a humanitarian mission. We must finish what we have started.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Top Stories

A police officer removes a package containing a human foot from the Conservative Party headquarters in Ottawa on Tuesday, May 29, 2012. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Police probe body parts in Ottawa, torso in Montreal

More   4 Comments 4    5 Video(s) 5

Vic Toews, Public Safety Minister, and Jason Kenney, Minister of Citizenship, make an announcement related to terrorism research funding during a press conference in the foyer of the House of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Wednesday, May 30, 2012. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Ottawa pledges $1.1M to counter-terrorism research

More

Pope Benedict XVI, Vatican

Pope breaks silence over 'Vatileaks' scandal

More   2 Comments 2  

Most Talked about Stories

While Branson's comments (and activities) are arrogant in a million different ways, Clark's response was admirable. She kept her sense of humour with her joke about Branson's brand-name and his bad pick-up line, showing why humour is often the best response to arrogance.

D Austin (Fredericton)

B.C. premier rebuffs Branson's naked kitesurfing invite