Top Stories -   

1
Raul Vervuzco of Eagle Services uses a suction hose to clean oil from atop the Kalamazoo River in a containment area in Augusta, Mich., Wednesday, July 28, 2010. (AP / The Kalamazoo Gazette, Jonathon Gruenke) Frank Roberts, left, and Trever Miller, contract workers for Enbridge, Inc., Calgary, Canada, discuss the operation of placing booms across the Kalamazoo River, on Morrow Lake, Kalamazoo, County, Galesburg, Mich., in attempts to contain the growing oil spill, Wednesday, July 28, 2010. (AP / Shawano Cleary) A Canada goose covered in oil attempts to fly out of the Kalamazoo River in Marshall, Mich., Tuesday, July 27, 2010. (AP / Kalamazoo Gazette, Jonathon Gruenke) John Corcoran, center, and Cam Meyers, right, watch from the 15 Mile Road bridge as oil flows in the Kalamazoo River Tuesday, July 27, 2010, in Marshall, Mich.(AP Photo/The Kalamazoo Gazette, Jonathon Gruenke) Oil

Enbridge doubles cleanup effort for Michigan oil spill

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV National News: Janet Dirks reports
Over three million litres of oil is spilling into the Kalamazoo River in Michigan, coating birds and fish in the crude. The pipeline owned by Canada's Enbridge has been leaking since Monday as the oil giant doubles its effort to clean it up.
CTV News Channel: Mary Dettloff, spokesperson
The Michigan Department of Natural Resources' Mary Dettloff says it has been a challenge for Enbridge to get a repair crew to where the leak is because its in a swampy area.
CTV News Channel: Tim Martin, Associated Press
A correspondent with the Associated Press says Enbridge feels very confident that it will be able to stop the flow of oil fairly quickly and has made it a top priority to put more resources out there to deal with the issue.
CTV News Channel: Update by officials on oil spill
Speaking from Battle Creek, Mich., officials discuss a leak from an oil pipeline that has spilled over 3 million litres of oil and say that they are focused on excavating to access the pipe and find the cause of the leak and increasing the number of booms.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (49) Facebook   

Raul Vervuzco of Eagle Services uses a suction hose to clean oil from atop the Kalamazoo River in a containment area in Augusta, Mich., Wednesday, July 28, 2010. (AP / The Kalamazoo Gazette, Jonathon Gruenke) Frank Roberts, left, and Trever Miller, contract workers for Enbridge, Inc., Calgary, Canada, discuss the operation of placing booms across the Kalamazoo River, on Morrow Lake, Kalamazoo, County, Galesburg, Mich., in attempts to contain the growing oil spill, Wednesday, July 28, 2010. (AP / Shawano Cleary) A Canada goose covered in oil attempts to fly out of the Kalamazoo River in Marshall, Mich., Tuesday, July 27, 2010. (AP / Kalamazoo Gazette, Jonathon Gruenke) John Corcoran, center, and Cam Meyers, right, watch from the 15 Mile Road bridge as oil flows in the Kalamazoo River Tuesday, July 27, 2010, in Marshall, Mich.(AP Photo/The Kalamazoo Gazette, Jonathon Gruenke) Oil

Photos

Raul Vervuzco of Eagle Services uses a suction hose to clean oil from atop the Kalamazoo River in a containment area in Augusta, Mich., Wednesday, July 28, 2010. (AP / The Kalamazoo Gazette, Jonathon Gruenke)

View Larger Image

Date: Wed. Jul. 28 2010 9:25 PM ET

Canadian oil giant Enbridge has doubled the manpower and equipment for a cleanup operation after more than three million litres of oil spilled into Michigan's Kalamazoo River, one of the state's major waterways.

The leak was detected Monday in a pipeline that carries about 30 million litres of oil daily from Griffith, Ind., to Sarnia, Ont.

The 76-centimetre pipeline was built in 1969 and is operated by Enbridge Energy Partners LP of Houston, an affiliate of Calgary-based Enbridge Inc.

Associated Press reporter Tim Martin said Wednesday the company has "doubled its manpower today and doubled the amount of booms and vacuums that are sucking up oil on the river."

"(Company officials) have appeared pretty confident from the start that they would be able to stop the flow of oil well before it reaches Lake Michigan," Martin told CTV News Channel in a telephone interview from Battle Creek, Mich.

"They feel they'll be able to stop it in Kalamazoo County, which is quite a few miles before it feeds into southern Lake Michigan."

Company officials estimated Wednesday that about 3,100,252 litres of oil was spilled into Talmadge Creek before the leak was repaired. However, state officials reported Tuesday evening that during a briefing with the company, Enbridge said about 3,319,806 litres of oil was spilled.

The oil then flowed into the Kalamazoo River and Morrow Lake. Mary Dettloff of the Michigan Department of Natural Resources said the spill has impacted about 56 kilometres of the Kalamazoo River. A state of emergency has been declared in Calhoun County and other potentially affected areas.

Dettloff told CTV News Channel Wednesday evening that valves have been shut off on either side of the leak, so petroleum is no longer flowing through the pipe.

Dettloff said the agency has yet to undertake an assessment of the environmental damage due to high levels of toxic fumes in the air around the spill. She said she expects that effort to get underway Thursday.

Earlier Wednesday, Enbridge officials came under fire for an apparent delay in reporting the spill. Rep. Mark Schauer of Michigan released documents that show the spill was not reported to the National Response Center until 1:30 p.m. on Monday. Enbridge said the spill was detected at 10:30 a.m., but had to determine the estimated volume of the spill before reporting it to authorities. The company said it tried calling at 1:00 p.m. but was put on hold and so called back a half hour later.

Enbridge president and chief executive Patrick D. Daniel said Wednesday the company has "made significant progress" during the cleanup effort so far but still has "a long way to go."

Daniel said Tuesday evening crews were digging up the pipe to find out what caused the leak.

The company had about 200 people working on the spill on Tuesday and said it will set up a centre to help ducks, geese and other animals coated with oil. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency was also scheduled to bring additional workers to the region.

Health officials have warned area residents to stay away from the spill. A few households have been evacuated.

Martin said many local residents were surprised to learn there was a pipeline so close to the river.

"A lot of people don't realize that in the industry that's not all that uncommon," Martin said. "I think it just took a lot of people that actually live in this area by surprise that there's been a pipeline there since 1969 and there's oil close by every day."

According to Martin, company officials have yet to issue a timeline or a cost breakdown for the cleanup.

Groundwater testing was also scheduled to begin Wednesday to ensure water supplies close to the river had not been contaminated. Calhoun County officials said they are unconcerned about the water systems supplying Marshall and Battle Creek.

Comments are now closed for this story

Jeff V Mb.
said

Pipe line leaks are inevitable. Especially with age. But more diligent inspections could help detect early problems, however this extra cost of doing business is going to be passed on to the consumer. We complain louder when our pump costs go up, but most of the public need to become better aware of what it takes to turn over their engines and come to an more equitable balance.


John Hamilton
said

US invades Iraq to control world oil.Now the US is literally coated in oil.Karma? or Irony?


Alethia
said

As a contrarian who champions the 3rd option/point of view...

Apparently that pipeline was built in 1969 as an extension of a pipe line contracted by Pierre Elliot Trudeau. Technology has changed enormously in the past 40 years: For example, pipelines today are built with a special moly-steel, alloyed with about 8% moly. It is simply impervious to corrosion.
You can leave a block of this steel in the ocean for 100 years with no rust.

Not only do I support the BC pipeline initiative, but also I think North America needs to start planning replacement pipelines for these golden oldies.




dingleberry
said

Chill folks.....The sun is going to explode in 5 billion years anyway and destroy the earth, so it doesn't really matter....


BF
said

I currently work for a large oil company performing pipeline integrity analysis. I know these things can be prevented, and I think in the next few years you will see a lot more activity by oil companies to detect flaws in old pipelines. I would be shocked if this line had not already been inspected using a lino log (smart pig)as it would be flagged as a higher risk line due its age. Sometimes these readings can be wrong as the technology is still new(ish) I wouldn't hold you breath, you are going to see a LOT more of this as pipelines are getting older and close to there expiry date.


papamiah
said

serves us right!!

John Brown
said

terra says : "We can prevent the oil spills of the future by choosing to NOT buy oil products. It is OUR power, and OUR money that big oil companies want. It is OUR money that is lining the exec's pockets."

And its YOUR computer thats made of plastic thats made from THEIR OIL that makes THEM money that lines BIG OIL's pockets.

oh dear - the IRONY.


John in Calgary
said

I would like to see any one of you who have posted a comment to say what you are doing to reduce your dependancy on petroleum products before complaining. Every one of us unfortunately rely on Enbridge / BP to fill up our cars, power our lights...etc.

I bike 16+kms to work among other things.


Colleen
said

I believe its not two major spills but three as China has its own spill to contend with and its real iffy about how China cleans up. So looks like everyone is in the same boat and its headed to China next.


Rick in NB, Ste marie
said

If your tired of oil spills, go to youtube and watch " The front fell off " . It might make you feel better.


bill in Ottawa
said

Not big on business law, are you Joe....Canadian companies are subject to Canadian law when doing international business. The same way American companies are subject to American law everywhere THEY conduct international business. That's why it is illegal for domestic (Canadian and American) companies to use bribery in countries where bribery is legal. Yes, these places exist....


terra
said

We can prevent the oil spills of the future by choosing to NOT buy oil products. It is OUR power, and OUR money that big oil companies want. It is OUR money that is lining the exec's pockets. If WE make better choices about where OUR HARD EARNED dollars go, than we shouldn't have greedy and corrupt companies destroying OUR homes, OUR lives and OUR wildlife.
Stop giving them permission to destroy, just say NO!
P.S. Get a bicycle. You benefit, the environment will benefit, and most important the CHILDREN will benefit!
BUT THE OIL EXECS WILL NOT.


Dan Ziewa
said

It's about 450km from Griffith to Sarnia. Pressure waves generally travel through crude pipelines at over 1 km/s. That's less than 10 minutes for the pressure and flow rates to differ from one end to the other. How does over two hours worth of oil getting spilled not look like gross negligence?


True Conservative
said

Once again I have to agree with professor Pye Chartt- since regulations wouldn't have stopped this spill because it was an accident, then all regulations should be eliminated. After all, if we can't stop all oil spills, why should we stop any of them? Of course the Liberal coconuts will argue that the fewer spills the better, but they're forgetting about the profit factor- if regulations limit profit, and can't stop all spills, then we don't need them! Do the Liberal coconuts know how much it would have cost to prevent the BP Gulf disaster? A half million dollars. President Bush was right to have deregulated the oil industry. Think of how much money BP has saved, and passed along as dividends, because they were able to eliminate a blow out preventor from all of their wells in the Gulf. Exxon, Mobil, BP- they've saved millions and millions. And it only cost a relatively small spill that will be forgotten about within a few months. When it comes to the environment or profit, I'm with the Professor every time. Show me the money baby! To hell with future generations.


Jewelz
said

Did anyone else catch the other article about Enbrige "under charging" consumers..... Is this how the clean up is being paid for?


Jenn
said

Chris - you sounded smart until you said this: "It is unfortunate that these things do happen however preventing something like this is nearly impossible (unless you can see through 3/4 inch steel)and as such patrolling and trying to detect weakness or stress in the pipeline would take a very large and very educated workforce that does not exist on that scale."I worked for the comapny about 3 years ago that was in charge of inspecting Enbridges Pipelines. They take a tool called a pig and drop it in the line. It then sends Ultra sonic waves to read the integrity of the line. The men and woman who do this are a very educated workforce. Unfortunetely because of governement regulations and company procedures, there can be issues on getting the lines inspected in a timely matter. These things can be prevented. The line in question was built in the late 60's. It's called updating your equipment. To Jennifer - there already is a shortage of fresh uncontaminted water on earth. Just cause you can buy a bottle of evian, don't let that give the illusion that there is alot of fresh drinking water on earth. Sad Mistake!


John Newmarket
said

I wonder if these guys will approach the cleanup with the same fascist zeal they use screwing their own customers... Scary thing is after the cleanup and the lawsuits who do you think these monopolizing clowns are going to pass the losses on to?


Time to Exit
said

There are simply too many consumers on the planet. The problem isn't the products and materials we consume, it's the number of people consuming. Why aren't the eco-nuts targetting the core problem? Just too many people. Will the eco-nuts if they are in fact truly passionate about their claims, be the first to leave earth? Let's show them the "portal" now.


Not For Money
said

Shawn in Nunavut says they're in it for the money. Geesh, I hope the thaw comes soon enough for you, Shawn. What did you think they were in it for? And small industry is only in it for fun, right?


tom91
said

To the first comment by Shawn. ALL industries are in it for the money. Every single company, including the barber and the butcher. I don't plan to stop using gasoline anytime soon, so why would I yell at the oil companies for doing what I pay them to do? Accidents will always occur, this won't be the last one. You can blame them if they were negligent or didn't follow protocol, but to say "why is happening" is truly naive. I guess it's just easy to complain.


Albertan
said

@Eve - don't forget people in the early 1900's drank the water from the streams! I am glad the company responsed as fast as they did and that service companies could respond ON LAND as fast as they did to recover as much of the potential damage it could cause - espically if it rained. Spills happen that's a fact - it's how you respond, how you clean up the spill and most of all what compensation is paid for damages to people and restoring the enviroment to the way you found it.


Rob from SK
said

I know we are all in oil-bashing mode right now, and I have had alot of bad things to say about the BP spill... but give these guys a few days before you jump on them.. the leak only happened 2 days ago, and it's already been fixed.. now it's just a clean-up operation... and they are only 3 days in... I think they are doing a good job when compared to BP... Oil spills are going to happen, as long as we continue to use oil. The difference here is, there was already a plan to stop the flow incase of a leak (unlike BP) and even tho 3M liters is alot.. it's nothing compared to the hundreds of millions of BARRELS (not liters) BP spilled. I think Enbridge is doing a good job.. SO FAR... Give them a little bit of time before you jump all over them.. remember.. this is DAY 3, and the oil has stopped flowing...


CK
said

Yes, this is sad what has happened but bad things happen. We are a society dependent on oil and will be for a long time. This will not be the last oil spill or clean up. Every person in the developed world uses oil everyday, making each and everyone of us responsible, if we didn't use oil no one would be spilling it. The producers will be held accountable and life in Michigan, St Catherine and The Gulf will go on and we will continue buying their products. People need to stop criticizing of things they need and worry about things they can control.


Mal F.
said

To: Shawn in Nunavut

And another part of the blame goes to public for not cutting their consumptions, drive SUVs and live in large houses, which all needs oil to burn.


Joe
said

@Sue: So companies operating in foreign countries should operate under the laws of their homeland? Bright idea......


T in AB
said

Cause UNKNOWN - could be someone damaged the line intentionally!

Not beyond an Environmentalist to do something like that to prove a point!

Wait for the Facts! All so quick to judge without them...



Eve
said

A story from the future...Jimmy: "Grandpa, the kids at school won't believe me when I told them that you used to fish in lakes and streams." Grandpa, "Well, it is true, Jimmy, we used to be able to do that. It was wonderful." Jimmy, "Were you able to go outside without your protective masks and sunshield clothing?" Grandpa, "Yes, we used to be able to go outside and play, dip our feet in the lake and swim. We used to lay out in the sun and feel the heat on our faces. We even saw live animals in their natural habitat." Jimmy, "Boy, I wonder what that would be like. You were lucky Grandpa."


JB in Ontario
said

Who will take the blame for this spill, or are they just going to pass the buck like in the Gulf oil catastrophe?? Are there any environmentalists employed by Enbridge?? Speak up!


Paul
said

Once again it all rides on the government. I have worked in virtually every primary industry including oil, and what happens is the government sets guidelines. The company then sets a tighter guideline so errors and ommisions will not put them over the governments guidelines. Then they also look at cost, and if it is cheaper to pay the fine than to follow the law, they will pay the fine. They have to. So the government needs to set higher, tighter, standards and raise the punishment for failing. Simple. Don't blame the companies, they are just following where the government leads.


steelheadking
said

Just what we don't need in B.C. RIVERS.


Chris from Calgary
said

Lets do some math here people, 33 million litres of oil in a day and only 3,319,708 liters were spilt which mean that from discovering the leak to stopping it was less than 3 hours, and that is for a 24 hour day not a 8 hour workday. I for one applaude how fast this company had the leak under control and are trying to save as much of the wildlife as possible.

It is unfortunate that these things do happen however preventing something like this is nearly impossible (unless you can see through 3/4 inch steel)and as such patrolling and trying to detect weakness or stress in the pipeline would take a very large and very educated workforce that does not exist on that scale.

Unfortunately it is the almighty dollar that drives us. This is why many people, like myself, go to post secondary. To get an education and a decent job to provide for future families adequately.




Sue
said

@Prof Pye Chart, but, Harper himself said, oil spills could never happen in Canada because of our laws. Not that this one did but it's a Canadian company, I guess they're just not up to date on Harper's laws. Golly gee I can't believe you're rolling your eyes to something your hero Harper said. That was your first comment ever that you didn't stoop to calling Ignatieff childish names & blaming the liberals for all your misfortunes.

Doug # BC
said

This is truly unfortunate,and a cause for real concern.But the real tragedy will come only if we fail to learn from this.Accidents are going to happen in any risky venture.Air travel is the safest way to go in the 21st century.But a lot of planes crashed,and a lot of people died before we got it right.Investigators examined virtually every not,bolt,and pie3ce of wire to determine why it happened,and fixed the weak link.The only way anyone bercomes a "LOSER",is if they fail to learn from this,or simply give up. "Scott in Montreal" would be wise to consider how much Alberta oil money is contrbuted to the economy of Quebec.While I easy concede that is no excuse for building bad pipe lines,it must not be an excuse to give up.If we landlock Alberta oil we are essentially married to the USA market forever.I doubt that will help Canada estabish it's sovereignty,enrich it's economy,or broaden opportunities for the next generation.To deal with the USA from a position of strenght,we need to diversify our markets.ESPECIALLY when we are selling energy they need. My point is,that if mankind can land men on the moon,explore the solar system,cure previously fatal diseases,there is no way on earth you can convince me that,in the 21st century,we cannot safely transport oil products from Alberta to emerging markets,via BC. We need to help Alberta take advantage of a valuable resource.It is a huge issue,and one of national security.AND,we need to prove that Canadian technology CAN do a simple job,and do it CORRECTLY.Give up?? Are you serious? Is that why we educate people?? Why send people to school if you don't trust them to do difficult jobs? And NO.Oil will not be obsolete any time soon.If you like starving people,perhaps.Otherwise,not for another generation.


Wendy
said

Another good reason for not running Alberta's pipeline through BC, keep your dirty oil.


Jennifer K.
said

What is with all these oil spills in recent months? It is ridiculous! Pretty soon there will be no clean water left anywhere if this keeps happening.


Prof. Pye Chartt
said

This must be the fault of American regulators. (Probably a group of evil and dastardly Republicans somewhere in Washington.) Surely a Canadian company couldn't actually be responsible for polluting the environment. Our national regulations governing the pipeline transport of oil and gas don't leave room, or opportunity, for any "mishaps." (Eye-roll.)


Gord
said

Just the simple mentality of the average oild company, rape a pilage make obscene profits and still no reinvestment back into ageing infrastructure. Only make bandade repairs after a major failure. These are the same companies that screw you to the table every time you fill up your car, inflated grossly high gas prices lead to grossly high mind boggling profits. Just sickening.


Scott in Montreal
said

Wait, isn't it Enbridge that wants to build a cross-country pipeline from the Tar Sands to Kitimat, B.C. ? Nothing to see here folks...move along...


greg520@hotmail.com
said

LOSERS !


JB in Ontario
said

Another oilspill. More fish and wildlife dying because of this, but the almighty buck doesn't care. People have a short memory when it comes to disasters. It seems the only thing motivating these greedy corporations is money.


Jim McB
said

What caused the leak?Was it a malfuntion, an accident or an eco terrorist organization like Greenpeace out to make a point?


Ryan, Guelph
said

Oil spills like this have been happening for ages. I think the reason people aren't asking for heads to roll on this one is that the head of the company is responding quickly and personally to the problem, where the CEO of BP went out for a yacht ride. Anyway, I still pin this whole problem on all of us, not just the oil companies or gov't. If we as a people would reject fossil fuels and push for clean energy, we would avoid oil spills all together.


kevin
said

Boy them oilsands just keep looking better and better !


True Conservative
said

No doubt the enviroweenies and socialist tree huggers will be out in force condemning this spill, especially since it comes right on the heels of the mishap in the Gulf. They'll probably argue that oil is too damaging to the environment, that we ought to stop burning fossil fuels as soon as possible, that we ought to be switching to more alternative energy sources. These hippie left-wingers never seem to realize what impact switching to alternative sources of energy would have on our economy. It could cost billions of dollars in lost profits to oil and gas companies to switch to ethanol, solar, wind and nuclear energy. Oh sure the environment might be improved, global warming slowed, and our oil dependence on the Middle East ended so we wouldn't have to invade more countries for their oil. But what about the profits of the oil companies? What doesn't anyone seem to care about them anyore? Oil is going to run out anyway, and then we'll be forced to make changes. Why not just wait until that happens? Or wait until the price of oil goes to ten bucks a litre? In the meantime, we can just live with the climate change, drought, forest fires, floods, hurricanes, oil spills and the melting of the ice caps caused by CO2. Honestly, these left-wing enviro wingnut coconuts need to give their heads a shake!


JL
said

Truly moronic. There is no excuse for this.


Alyx Crawford
said

Gee, how come nobody is calling for heads to roll at Enbridge? -- This just tells me that whether it is deep-sea drilling or traditional well, whether the oil is transported by ship, rail, road, or pipeline, there will be "accidents," whatever the cause. It's unfortunate, and the loss of wildlife and plant life is a tragedy, but it is a reality, and one which oil companies SHOULD be prepared to handle.


John
said

It's pretty sad that this keeps happening......and we keep ruining our beautiful planet.I hope my kids will be able to enjoy fresh air and clean waters.....


Kris D.
said

Stupid to the last drop...


Shawn in Nunavut
said

This just goes to show that many of the "big" industries are only in it for the money. Two major disasters have happened in the past few months and the companies don't have the resources to deal with the issues. Part of the blame goes to the companies, the other to the government. Hopefully someday this can be worked out. Accidents do happen, but there must be more accountability on all ends.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Oil spill in Michigan

In Pictures: Rush to save wildlife as millions of litres pours into Michigan river.

Today's Top Stories

A police officer removes a package containing a human foot from the Conservative Party headquarters in Ottawa on Tuesday, May 29, 2012. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Police probe body parts in Ottawa, torso in Montreal

More   3 Comments 3    5 Video(s) 5

Vic Toews, Public Safety Minister, and Jason Kenney, Minister of Citizenship, make an announcement related to terrorism research funding during a press conference in the foyer of the House of Commons on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Wednesday, May 30, 2012. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Ottawa pledges $1.1M to counter-terrorism research

More

Pope Benedict XVI, Vatican

Pope breaks silence over 'Vatileaks' scandal

More   2 Comments 2  

Most Talked about Stories

While Branson's comments (and activities) are arrogant in a million different ways, Clark's response was admirable. She kept her sense of humour with her joke about Branson's brand-name and his bad pick-up line, showing why humour is often the best response to arrogance.

D Austin (Fredericton)

B.C. premier rebuffs Branson's naked kitesurfing invite