Top Stories -   

1

Census supporters take fight to YouTube with song

A screen-grab of John Campey and the Data Hounds' YouTube video for their song 'Count Me In' on Tuesday, July 20, 2010.
A screen-grab of John Campey and the Data Hounds' YouTube video for their song 'Count Me In' on Tuesday, July 20, 2010.

View Larger Image

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (24) Facebook   

Date: Tuesday Jul. 20, 2010 7:48 PM ET

OTTAWA — You've heard about Internet singalongs for famine or earthquake relief -- now there's one in support of the Canadian long-form census.

A group of singers who usually jam in Toronto backyards with a karaoke machine have put together a video for YouTube.

John Campey and the so-called Data Hounds sing about the need to keep the long-form census intact, all to the tune of Gary Lewis and the Playboys' hit Count Me In.

Campey is executive director of Social Planning Toronto and says he and his friends fear the loss of valuable data with the federal government's decision to go from a mandatory long-form census to a voluntary survey.

"I sent out an email inviting people to an emergency singalong, and about a dozen people answered the call, and we filmed it on Friday night, and a friend edited it and posted it, and that's the story," said Campey.

Friends from all political parties participated in the video, he added.

The one Conservative in the group has his face digitally scrambled and stands behind a picture of Sarah Palin, the former U.S. vice-presidential candidate.

"That's our Tory," Campey said.

Stephen Harper's Conservative government cancelled the mandatory long-form census saying many Canadians found it intrusive and coercive.

A wide variety of groups have decried the move, including the Canadian Jewish Congress, the Registered Nurses Association of Ontario and the Federation of Francophone and Acadian Communities.

Campey said he hopes more than just his mother will check out his first foray into YouTube.

"It's able to make a point hopefully in a fun way because this is an issue where there's so much actual information and facts, the argument can get a little bit dense at times," he said.

Comments are now closed for this story

Sara in Toronto
said

I find it HILARIOUS that people claim "Aw the long form is too intrusive, yeah, it's nobody's business what my income is but the household's, wah wah etc."Then what on earth do you people call a TAX RETURN?! That's pretty intrusive isn't it? I assume, then, that you don't file those?Do you want the country to be planned and run properly, with ACCURATE information, or not?


B. Kelley, Ontario
said

Name, rank and serial number is all the government should be entitled to know. I wouldn't trust StatsCan or any other government agency or bureaucrat with any personal information at any time. If government or private organizations want to know this stuff then let them call me, justify the need and, if I agree to provide it, then pay me for my time. They charge service fees for virtually everything they do so why should I not follow their sterling example and do exactly the same. Take the long form, short form, the medium sized form and the giant economy size and, well..... you know.


Bethw
said

Funny stuff! Listen one thing about the number of bedrooms question - it's not some salacious or arbitrary question. It's used in the calculation of overcrowding statistics based on number of bedrooms, number of people in the household, and the relationship between the various people in the household. Which tells us something important about the housing situation in Canada, and over time, whether things are getting better or worse. Not a bad idea if you have a government committed to ensuring adequate housing conditions for all - which we don't ... Save the Census!!


Larry King
said

In fairness, this is in line with the Conservatives modus operandi of making important decisions with as little information as possible.


Jim McB
said

I would like to ask each one of them why it is important for them to keep the long form and mandatory completion. I bet I would get a collective dughhh.These opposition parties that profess to stand for the rights defined in the Charter have yet to explain why it is that they want my rights violated. Is it because I refuse to be a criminal?The media has not pursued that thread yet and likely won't: and that could be construed as bias!


Mark
said

Ummm, I hate census forms. Period. The less I have to fill out the better.


John
said

My little town had a problem. Disabled individuals in the community had problems buying their groceries. So the town council said, let's figure out who these people are and then allocate some money to a program to help them. But with a population of 100,000, how to figure out how big the problem is? How many people are in this situation? We could set up a poll of 1000 people and ask them if they have a physical disability and find it hard to get their groveries? We did that, but only 5% of the 20,000 people we called answered the survey. That's just too few to believe the data. So we had a mandatory census of 20% of the population. 100 people said they had a physical disability and found it hard to get there groceries. These 100 people represent 500 people in the city. So, now we know how many to help. Without it being mandatory, there is NO WAY to know with any degree of confidence how many people there are that you need to help. Of course, maybe helping people isn't the objective.


Jim-Surrey
said

The long form asks too many personal questions and it seems that all those complaining of the short form are getting our information that only the government should have and no one else.All that is needed is a head count with ages and place of birth, maybe religious background (not that should be anyone's business), years in Canada, and are you a Canadian citizen.Income and such is no ones business but the households.


David from Toronto
said

the real controversy should have been the government asking way too much information about us with the long form. All that should be required is the number of people living in your household, that's it. Why does big brother need to know so much detail about us? How is it that all these Liberals can tell us that we should share all this personal information to big brother and still maintain straight faces while doing it?


WInnipeg Guy
said

I say good riddance to that mandatory long-form crap. No good deed goes unpunished Mr. Harper.


Short form supporter
said

Let's stick to a short census and let the pllsters and larketing agencies find out this info and sell it to whomever they want. The government does not need to waste the money collecting all this extra info, organizing it into its categories and then passing it along gratis to anyone and everyone. Let the private industry do it, not our tax dollars.


Sandra
said

I don't usually agree with the conservatives, but this is say I agree with (probably not for the same reasons). I don't feel we need a survey to tell us what the issues are with this country, majority of surveys done we already already know the answer. these only label ourselves more so we can pull apart instead of together, that creates unity and equality.


Acroyear
said

I have no objection to providing data that will help the government form proper and informed policy. But the long form census became a Stats Canada tool to acquire incredibly valuably marketing data that no Canadian would have given up otherwise and give up at the point of a gun. The very argument that so many people are using, that the data must be forced from us or it's of no value, only makes me want to resist it all the more. They are obviously fully aware that we, the people who PAY THEIR SALARIES, do not what them to have it, so they feel they should have the right to force it from us. My preferred solution would have been to change the long from to get rid of this marketing data and make it about, and only about the invaluable information needed to form policy. Then perhaps change the short form to include this data from us all then it's an actual hard snap shot of all of Canada at that moment in time. The fury and howls from the various stats and marketing people only prove that they need a spanking from we, the people, in order to understand that providing any data beyond the need of the government is OUR choice, not their right.


Lz in Edmonton
said

I've filled out the long form and when you have a family of 5, you wonder, why the heck do they even want this? Listen, instead of sending me the long form, if I really want to tell you how many bedrooms I have, how many times I flush a toilet, and what my annual gas bill is, perhaps they can just get that information from the utility companies that have, to the exact penny, what is being spent, on average, by Canadian Households. Dang, they even have it down to the street.... Fancy that. If there are indeed 2.5 million long forms, perhaps they can just send them to every liberal, NDP, Green Party, and Conservative card carrying member to come up with the numbers. They seem to LIVE off this stuff. Now if some groups are so HARD done by some of the questions not being asked, perhaps, for the next time around, everyone can agree on WHAT intrusive questions are TRULY needed on the form and what others are, shall we say, TOTALLY unnecessary. We even have laws to put people in JAIL for not answering questions? What communist state are we living in? Oh yes, Canada.


Ian
said

It's amazing! we have illegal taxes being forced down our throats (HST and ECO Fees in Ontario) and we have people protesting the fact that the Gvt is cancelling a 40 page census form that takes 2 hours to fill in, and can result in charges if you don't. Purely partisan driven I'm sure. It's like I've said before, Harper can't do anything without taking heat. I bet there are people who don't care one way or the other who will still find fault in it.


Jack R
said

What is it with Canadian leftists and their morbid fascination with the American right? Why do these kooky guys have a cardboard cutout of Palin in the video....or at all! So weird...get over it guys.


Sarah
said

Great - Send each and every single one of these guys the *40 page* long form census and demand they have it filled out by the deadline. We'll see if they put their money where their mouths are.


mike
said

why do all these groups want this ? this is why because they make money off it big money , and they do not have to lift a finger. i did this crap last time and it is too much info a good percent would never be used by goverment butis given to charitys and special interest groups and those are real facts so no let these groups stop hideing and eran there money.


Spence in Ontario
said

Haha. Nice song. These guys have it right on the money. The information provided by the long form census is too important to get rid of. It is purely stupid and illogical on the part of Stephen Harper to scrap this vital resource.


Dennis Guthrie
said

Why would anyone protest getting rid of this.I have always found it a huge invasion of my privacy and a total waste of time. It's about time someone got rid of this.

Kris D.
said

We live in the best country in the world. Is it really to much to ask for each of us to fill out a form once every several years? This information is very valuable for program planning, forecasting and all sorts of other metrics. Just another lame Conservative attack on intelligence.

raj
said

well let them fill in the long form, all of them When it says income, they might not have any, given they have way too much time on their hands.


ame in TO
said

Hey everyone should stand for something - slightly kooky but got to hand it to them catchy and has landed them on the CTV website, so they are doing something right. Way to cut throught the clutter of the issue and get your voice heard! Smart advocacy tactic.


LDL in ONT
said

Really ? Way too much time on their hands. Are there no other seriously pressing social issues that deserves their singing abilities. Is this issue so important that the media feels compelled to draw our attention to a You-Tube video. I guess I'm just not fully appreciative of the gravity of this vital, and in the words of the media,"controvercial" topic !


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Top Stories

A police officer removes a package containing a human foot from the Conservative Party headquarters in Ottawa on Tuesday, May 29, 2012. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Police probe body parts in Ottawa, torso in Montreal

More   3 Comments 3    5 Video(s) 5

Pope Benedict XVI, Vatican

Pope breaks silence over 'Vatileaks' scandal

More   2 Comments 2  

Former Liberian President Charles Taylor waits for the start of his sentencing judgement in the courtroom of the Special Court for Sierra Leone in Leidschendam, near The Hague, Netherlands, Wednesday May 30, 2012.  (AP / Toussaint Kluiters)

Charles Taylor gets 50 years for 'brutal' crimes

More   4 Comments 4    2 Video(s) 2

Most Talked about Stories

While Branson's comments (and activities) are arrogant in a million different ways, Clark's response was admirable. She kept her sense of humour with her joke about Branson's brand-name and his bad pick-up line, showing why humour is often the best response to arrogance.

D Austin (Fredericton)

B.C. premier rebuffs Branson's naked kitesurfing invite