News Sections
Woman sues Rogers for revealing her affair
CTV News Video
|
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
Selected Comment
Most of you are missing the point here, yes she was wrong for lying and cheating on her husband and there's no excuse for that, but Rogers did breach the contract and privacy terms it had with her. This is not acceptible. No one should have access to your private records without your permission and/or knowledge.
LC
Woman sues Rogers for revealing her affair
talking about
Woman sues Rogers for revealing her affair
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Mon. May. 17 2010 8:54 PM ET
A 37-year-old Toronto woman is suing telecom giant Rogers Communications for $600,000, alleging the company's billing practices revealed her infidelity, leading her husband to leave her.
"I had a brief affair -- it was very short-lived, a few weeks," Gabriella Nagy told CTV News. "I did not need to lose everything. I am at a point that there's no turning back. Everything that I held dear -- especially my job -- is gone."
Nagy filed a statement of claim alleging an invasion of privacy and breach of contract on Roger's part in an Ontario court.
Nagy had a cellphone account with Rogers in 2007, in which a monthly bill was sent to her home address in her maiden name. Her husband, who is not named in the statement of claim, had the family's cable and TV bill under his name.
In June of 2007, he called to add Internet and home phone services and the following month Rogers sent a "global" bill to the home address, including the itemized phone bill for Nagy's cellphone.
The husband saw several long phone calls to a single phone number, and called the number, and a "third party" revealed an affair on the part of Nagy, the woman told the Star.
"The husband used the previously private and confidential information that the defendant unilaterally disclosed to the husband to inquire about the people that the plaintiff was telephoning and the nature of such calls," the statement of claim reads.
The statement alleges Rogers "unilaterally terminated its cellular contract with the plaintiff that had been in her maiden name and included it in the husband's account that was under his surname.
"The plaintiff's maiden name and the husband's surname were different. Such unilateral action by the defendant was done without the knowledge, information, belief, acquiescence or approval of the plaintiff."
Rogers says it cannot be held responsible for the breakup of the marriage or the effects on Nagy's life.
"Rogers is not the cause of these," the statement of defence reads. "The marriage breakup and its effects happened, or alternatively would have happened, regardless of the form in which the plaintiff and her husband received their invoices for Rogers services in July 2007."
Nagy said her husband walked out on her and their two children after the affair came to light.
She says she was so upset about her marriage falling apart that her work performance suffered, leading her to lose her job as an apartment rental agent that paid nearly $100,000 a year.
With a report by CTV's Andria Case in Toronto
User Tools
Most Popular
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
This is just wrong but if I were to send something to the politicians I would have sent the brain!
Email
Comments are now closed for this story
DanDaOpinionMan
0
said
0
Teresa
0
said
0
Essentially, if the courts let Rogers off the hook for this woman's lawsuit, they're telling any company operating in Canada "Go ahead, breach privacy laws, breach contract law - you'll just get a slap on the wrist like Rogers did."
Cara B, NS
0
said
0
David
0
said
0
D.S.
0
said
0
Nathalie
0
said
0
BinTO
0
said
0
kenny g
0
said
0
Jean Nadeau
0
said
0
Max
0
said
0
Ki-Som
0
said
0
Elias Nasrallah
0
said
0
Elisa from GTA
0
said
0
mylene
0
said
0
Someone from Canada
0
said
0
Edward P
0
said
0
Anne M
0
said
0
Scott (in Wild Rose Alliance Country)
0
said
0
AGAINST ROGERS
0
said
0
Kathie
0
said
0
Kojak
0
said
0
no_name
0
said
0
CMQ
0
said
0
As for the affair, honestly, own up to the affair and take responsibility. I have made mistakes in my life in the past and the best way to learn from them is to take ownership of the mistakes, apologize to those you've hurt and move on. Playing the victim card will only leave you disillusioned, bitter and constantly immature. Grow up and learn to accept the consequences of a poor choice. Life can get better and will but accept what you have done and move on......
firstMickey
0
said
0
Dennis L. Krahn
0
said
0
Ann
0
said
0
Dan
0
said
0
Mead
0
said
0
Joel Bain
0
said
0
Gee Calgaary
0
said
0
Did Rogres bill the client for PI services ?
Mary Anne Brabander
0
said
0
Annoyed in Calgary
0
said
0
Sanders/ Vancouver
0
said
0
Unbelievable.
anna
0
said
0
She was in crisis? How did her husband feel?! She put him in crisis. This is still ALL about her, isn't it?
laky
0
said
0
Dave W, Lacombe, AB
0
said
0
rcleasby
0
said
0
Jim Thornable
0
said
0
Sandra
0
said
0
John
0
said
0
Kaptin
0
said
0
What gives Rogers the right to "Bundle" her private account under her maiden name with her husbands new account?
Glad I don't have a Rogers Cell phone account. All the phone sex things they could nail me for ... Oh! I forgot, I'm not married.
Watch it people, soon you will have them snooping where you surf, like they already don't.
Rogers is wrong here as they should never have merged her bill with her husbands without her consent.
Linda
0
said
0
Mike vdB - Chatham, ON
0
said
0
TDOG
0
said
0
JarJar
0
said
0
Rogers has the worst customer service in all of Canada. They are so rude and I have to say Im happy they are being brought up on something.
Again, its not about the act of cheating. Rogers needs to stop hiding behind what she was doing (which was wrong) they violated her rights just because her husband called.
Joe Donner
0
said
0
truenorth55
0
said
0
realist
0
said
0
Maggie
0
said
0
Perhaps she thought it would be okay and forgot about covering up the affair.
Regardless, her argument is that Rogers caused her breakup by revealing the affair which is not sound at all. Her marriage broke because of the affair and it would have been revealed eventually.
M.M.B. Ont
0
said
0
tdgladwin
0
said
0
Greg
0
said
0
John Smith
0
said
0
Sandra
0
said
0
Carol
0
said
0
my2¢worth
0
said
0
Marilynne Snider
0
said
0
MC
0
said
0
Stu
0
said
0
Max in Vancouver
0
said
0
thetruth1028
0
said
0
Bob
0
said
0
Mike
0
said
0
Kevin
0
said
0
Sylvie Smith - Ottawa
0
said
0
Doug
0
said
0
Christian, NL
0
said
0
Falderal
0
said
0
Rick in NB, Ste Marie
0
said
0
heartbreaker8000
0
said
0
Gregg from Picton
0
said
0
Kris
0
said
0
Portes
0
said
0
Fred - Brandon MB
0
said
0
Lz in Edmonton
0
said
0
jak
0
said
0
Ted
0
said
0
Dr. M
0
said
0
DJ Poe
0
said
0
Frank
0
said
0
Jonathan
0
said
0
Graeme
0
said
0
jonny
0
said
0
bc grrl
0
said
0
LC
0
said
0
Nanook
0
said
0
Graeme
0
said
0
Dave
0
said
0
WESTERNER
0
said
0
jeremy
0
said
0
Lz in Edmonton
0
said
0
a.
0
said
0
Frank Buchan
0
said
0
Al in Calgary
0
said
0
Niagara Guy
0
said
0
Christine
0
said
0
JL in Oshawa
0
said
0
dave
0
said
0
Poops McWillie
0
said
0
Brian fr Langley
0
said
0
Jim
0
said
0
Greg
0
said
0
Bruce - Ottawa
0
said
0
keith
0
said
0
MAL of TO
0
said
0
John
0
said
0
GMan
0
said
0
bigboss031483
0
said
0
Frank
0
said
0
Raj
0
said
0