Top Stories -   

1
Gabriella Nagy speaks with CTV Toronto, Monday, May 17, 2010.

Woman sues Rogers for revealing her affair

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV Toronto: Is Rogers to blame?
A cellphone bill is being blamed for ruining the marriage of a Toronto woman. Andria Case speaks with the woman.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (110) Facebook   

Gabriella Nagy speaks with CTV Toronto, Monday, May 17, 2010.

Photos

Gabriella Nagy speaks with CTV Toronto, Monday, May 17, 2010.

View Larger Image

Selected Comment

Most of you are missing the point here, yes she was wrong for lying and cheating on her husband and there's no excuse for that, but Rogers did breach the contract and privacy terms it had with her. This is not acceptible. No one should have access to your private records without your permission and/or knowledge.

LC

Woman sues Rogers for revealing her affair

talking about
Woman sues Rogers for revealing her affair

Date: Mon. May. 17 2010 8:54 PM ET

A 37-year-old Toronto woman is suing telecom giant Rogers Communications for $600,000, alleging the company's billing practices revealed her infidelity, leading her husband to leave her.

"I had a brief affair -- it was very short-lived, a few weeks," Gabriella Nagy told CTV News. "I did not need to lose everything. I am at a point that there's no turning back. Everything that I held dear -- especially my job -- is gone."

Nagy filed a statement of claim alleging an invasion of privacy and breach of contract on Roger's part in an Ontario court.

Nagy had a cellphone account with Rogers in 2007, in which a monthly bill was sent to her home address in her maiden name. Her husband, who is not named in the statement of claim, had the family's cable and TV bill under his name.

In June of 2007, he called to add Internet and home phone services and the following month Rogers sent a "global" bill to the home address, including the itemized phone bill for Nagy's cellphone.

The husband saw several long phone calls to a single phone number, and called the number, and a "third party" revealed an affair on the part of Nagy, the woman told the Star.

"The husband used the previously private and confidential information that the defendant unilaterally disclosed to the husband to inquire about the people that the plaintiff was telephoning and the nature of such calls," the statement of claim reads.

The statement alleges Rogers "unilaterally terminated its cellular contract with the plaintiff that had been in her maiden name and included it in the husband's account that was under his surname.

"The plaintiff's maiden name and the husband's surname were different. Such unilateral action by the defendant was done without the knowledge, information, belief, acquiescence or approval of the plaintiff."

Rogers says it cannot be held responsible for the breakup of the marriage or the effects on Nagy's life.

"Rogers is not the cause of these," the statement of defence reads. "The marriage breakup and its effects happened, or alternatively would have happened, regardless of the form in which the plaintiff and her husband received their invoices for Rogers services in July 2007."

Nagy said her husband walked out on her and their two children after the affair came to light.

She says she was so upset about her marriage falling apart that her work performance suffered, leading her to lose her job as an apartment rental agent that paid nearly $100,000 a year.

With a report by CTV's Andria Case in Toronto

Comments are now closed for this story

DanDaOpinionMan
said
0 0

I hope the proceedings go like this: the court or whatever finds that Rogers is not at fault for any break-up of the marriage or revealing the affair, but notes that Rogers should endeavour to implement more stringent privacy measures to ensure such a situation (where accounts are merged without the permission of *both* account holders) does not occur again.Then, the court (or whomever) should leave open the option for a reprisal not based around the results of the merge, but rather the actual act of the merge, so this woman could sue for that, but not for revealing the affair.


Teresa
said
0 0

Unfortunately, Rogers makes these so-called 'mistakes' all the time. They randomly change our account number on us, resulting in us accruing interest on the account as it takes them over a month to forward the payments from an old account number to a new one (they don't reverse interest charges, ever). Wouldn't mind if this only happened once, but this happened almost on a monthly basis. Due to this, they 'lost' our payments for our services - money came out of our accounts & disappeared. We still of course had to pay Rogers twice. 6 months later, they can't find a trace of these lost payments. Go go Rogers thieves.

Essentially, if the courts let Rogers off the hook for this woman's lawsuit, they're telling any company operating in Canada "Go ahead, breach privacy laws, breach contract law - you'll just get a slap on the wrist like Rogers did."


Cara B, NS
said
0 0

It doesn't matter if she was cheating on her husband or not, Rogers broken the law. Greg is the only poster on here who seems to have it right and he hit the nail on the head. Rogers violated every privacy law we have by merging those accounts without the permission of BOTH parties. Oh by the way, Liz in Edmonton, you are dead wrong. Saying "I do" does not make you one legal entity in this country and does not automatically give you legal access to your spouse's information. Even Canada Revenue Agency will not give you information about your spouse without that spouse's permission. I find it sad, and awfully naive of you people, that you are justifying Roger's outright breaching the privacy laws simply because this woman was doing something that was morally wrong.

David
said
0 0

Wow! I am amazed at what great lengths people will go to avoid accepting responsibility for their own actions! Suing Rogers?! It is because of self-centered people like this that the cost of consumer goods goes up and up. Business will always pass on the costs of lawsuits to us, the consumer. Grow up and accept the consequences for your actions!


D.S.
said
0 0

I just hope that her husband left with the kids, leaving her behind. What she did was wrong and she should not have cheated on her husband. And she should not sue the Rogers Company because she needed to be taught a lesson not to cheat on her family, her husband and her kids. That woman is a total selfish slut that anybody has ever seen. A selfish wife who forgot about her husband. A selfish mother who forgot about her kids. The truth is I don't feel sorry for her, period. Because she wasn't thinking straight by using her common sense. And I don’t feel sorry for her for losing her job. Whoever caught her cheating on her husband did a good job because no man would want a woman cheating on him behind his backs. Although I feel sorry for the husband because he feels betrayed and heartbroken by the revealing of her affair. I think he and the kids should leave her behind. I don’t think she should get a dime or $600 000 from Rogers Inc. because she messed herself up and it’s her fault that her husband left her. She deserved what she get. And I hope that the rest of her family will be angry at her for cheating on her husband and her kids. It is such a disgrace to innocent people getting hurt by someone like her. I just hope that they left her on her own. The question is who would want a cheating wife anyway? Who would want someone who is not committed to her family? Who would want someone who would break your heart anyway?


Nathalie
said
0 0

Rogers you suck big time. My daughter, who has a wireless contract, used the phone for roughly 3 minutes and tried to turn it in. She was not able too because they did not have their stuff together. I am not surprise that they did in dead breach the contract. They must pay for their mistake. Of course they will fire the employee who did not adhere to their confidentiality clause.


BinTO
said
0 0

Poor guy.. and poor woman... Yes she made a mistake ,but still Rogers can be blamed.. They should ask first the account holder then do such things...I was in a building the other day in Toronto and at the entrance there were 2 notices for 2 separate tenants.

kenny g
said
0 0

good for her, cheaters are all losers


Jean Nadeau
said
0 0

Both Rogers and the plaintiff are idiots in this case; Rogers for breaking privacy rules and the plaintiff for blaming Rogers for her own infidelity.


Max
said
0 0

I bet she will not win. The law should push and usher along a higher standard of ethics and giving or making an award in her favor will certainly not do that. One can always sympathize with her plight (or not) but rarely if ever do two wrongs (using wrong last name and cheating) ever add up into a single solitary right, right? On the other hand, I wish I had her case even though I am not a lawyer.


Ki-Som
said
0 0

The judge is going to laugh at her, then tell her that she shouldn't have cheated on her husband, then throw the case out. Get a life woman, only you have yourself to blame. Stop wasting the courts time.


Elias Nasrallah
said
0 0

This woman had no idea about privacy laws. It was when she was caught cheating that got her angry and she wants revenge and money. I hope the ex husband gets half.........


Elisa from GTA
said
0 0

I believe Rogers is responsible for breaking a contract and disclosing private information. I think it's a stretch to blame them for their client's marital problems. Rogers wasn't the cheating spouse here.




mylene
said
0 0

i do believe Rogers did fail to protect private information when combining all the bills together. This is the part of the blame they have to take upon themselves. However, the woman CHOSE to have an extra marital affair which lead to her husband leaving which in turned cause her to perform poorly at work which then resulted in financial losses... I highly doubt that joining the bills together would have ended their marriage if it hadn't been for the affair... come on now, you can't blame Rogers for the fact that you slept with someone else... these are far fetched allegations to say the least.


Someone from Canada
said
0 0

Ha, the husband should be grateful that rogers offers free PI service. To be serious, rogers is sort of in the right as all bills did to the same household, and there isn't any details about whether the wife refused to combine the bills. A side note, since when is fraud considered ok? If a company defrauds someone, they will want justice; that is ok, yes? Why not a when a spouse defrauds another?


Edward P
said
0 0

If you actually read the contract, Roger's doesn't promise to keep your personal information private. They "may share your information with third parties to better serve you". Was this gent a third party?


Anne M
said
0 0

Sue for HER having an affair??? What an idiot, she should have used a calling card, which could not be traced.This is a ridiculous law suit as far as I see it.


Scott (in Wild Rose Alliance Country)
said
0 0

I agree that the cheating is wrong (though cheating doesn't cause a bad marriage, it's a bad marriage causes cheating!) BUT the first thing going wrong was Rogers assuming information in the first place. Because of that, I would make Rogers pay...and pay dearly! (She'll need the cash!)


AGAINST ROGERS
said
0 0

This lady´s obvious lack of respect love for her husband, family and even herself aside. Rogers did commit a grave mistake in adding all the bills together without the consent of both parties. Roger´s is not responsible for her marriage breaking up , she did that very well on ehr own. BUT Rogers did however breach privacy and Contract policies in a major way and thus should compesate for it and I´m glad it being done publicly beause Rogers has done this with other people before. IT is a big company who wants to and has been manipulating the market for along time. Big comapny or not it needs ot be held responsible for its actions. Too many msitakes get swept under the rug. SO I think they should pay up and I hope they do, even if its not the amount she´s asking for.


Kathie
said
0 0

Guess she has to blame someone for her affair, wasn't her fault was it!!!


Kojak
said
0 0

Rogers should be sued more often. I had a payasyougo phone for over a year, then I notice an advertisement from them that sounded pretty good, (it turned out to be lies and false advertising - unlimited nothing) And I had nothing but problems with this Company. I received a bill for over $ 1200.00 for one month from these crooks and bandits. Over 2 hours on the telephone to customer service, having credits issued to the account on multiple occassions, another month later the same garbage happened. So, I stopped payment and they mail me these threatening letters claiming they want to sue for $ 1,500.00. I say bring it on! I was credited thousands of dollars for their lack of care and proper billing. They will never get another dime from me. Rogers is a terrible provider. Aside from the affair of this woman, it is still illegal to make account changes without proper consent. She has a case, but the reasons given for the lawsuit are unjust.


no_name
said
0 0

Rogers should learn to respect privacy, it's that simple, the affair doesn't have anything to do with the fact that Rogers did not respect her privacy.


CMQ
said
0 0

Yes Rogers' billing is incredibly stupid. I lived at a totally separate address from my ex wife for 3 years, not even in the same city. Then Rogers decided to "bundle" my bills and began charging me for cable and other services I didn't even have. I come to find out they "bundled" my ex and I's bills, because we had the same last name. Did I mention we didn't even live in the same city anymore!!!!!!! That's why I switched once my cell phone contract was done, that and several other reasons including poor service area and constant roaming by my phone.

As for the affair, honestly, own up to the affair and take responsibility. I have made mistakes in my life in the past and the best way to learn from them is to take ownership of the mistakes, apologize to those you've hurt and move on. Playing the victim card will only leave you disillusioned, bitter and constantly immature. Grow up and learn to accept the consequences of a poor choice. Life can get better and will but accept what you have done and move on......


firstMickey
said
0 0

Lady, you blew it. Don't expect any sympathy. It is your job to unscramble the egg you made yourself. Grow up and get responsible for a change.


Dennis L. Krahn
said
0 0

My wife and I each have a contract with Telus. Telus will not allow any 'cross action' between the two accounts. It is too bad the lady dragged all the other BS into the issue; on the other habd if she had not gone chasing cars she wouldn't be in this predicament.


Ann
said
0 0

Rogers is in breach of contract and privacy laws. I know with my husband's cell phone company that I could not answer any calls or do anything with his account unless he specifically added my name to the account. If the husband's name was not on her contract/account than Rogers had no business discussing it with anyone. Of course doing business with Rogers is a mistake in the first place. Now she is stupid for doing what she did and deserved to get caught. Losing her job has nothing to do with Rogers but her inability to leave personal issues at home.


Dan
said
0 0

In my opinion, this lady contributed to the demise of her own marriage through her own infidelity. Blaming someone else for inadvertantly passing along proof to her spouse is beyond silly.


Mead
said
0 0

If she can sue Rogers, then he can sue her for the full amount - for personal and financial damages.Rogers was an accidental and incidental mistake. Her contribution to the problem was willful with intent.


Joel Bain
said
0 0

This woman should pack and forget this lawsuit. She just makes herself look like that much more of a fool. Shame on her for having the gall to sue Rogers for the destruction of her marriage, when she was the one who was having the affair. Shame, shame, shame.


Gee Calgaary
said
0 0

Rogers makes a good PI.

Did Rogres bill the client for PI services ?


Mary Anne Brabander
said
0 0

Rogers certainly can't be held responsible for the breakup of the marriage; however, they should be taken to task about the privacy issue of this woman's account. It should not have been changed over without her express consent.


Annoyed in Calgary
said
0 0

Once again....it's not her fault. She cheated on her husband and it's someone elses fault for her husband leaving her. Maybe she should grow up and accept responsibility for her own actions. People like this is what is wrong with the world. No feelings of responsibility or what's right or wrong. they can do what they want and blame someone else. Stupid woman.


Sanders/ Vancouver
said
0 0

Is she serious? She's having an affair and got exposed and wants to blame someone else for her problems? Get real. She needs to stop wasting our tax dollars that fund our courts and leave them to handle legitimate cases.
Unbelievable.


anna
said
0 0

Stupid woman!
She was in crisis? How did her husband feel?! She put him in crisis. This is still ALL about her, isn't it?


laky
said
0 0

Rogers deserves to lose this case, but i hope the court awards her with only a dollar. Rogers deserves to pay, but she doesn't deserve a dime.


Dave W, Lacombe, AB
said
0 0

I agree Rogers breached her contract (though she may very well have to check the fine print) so they should be held liable for that. However, her marriage break-up and loss of job is not Rogers' fault but her's and they should not be held liable. If this is a common practice by Roger's - ie. giving out private information, combining accounts at same/similar addresses without permission,. etc. - the law should be involved. Then again, maybe there's something in that really small print in those contracts that allows this - except you need an electron microscope to read it! Even if the practice is legal, doesn't mean it's ethical or "right" and Rogers should think twice. Judging from the comments, they're losing customers - maybe that's the only message they'll listen too.


rcleasby
said
0 0

Outrageous! When are people going to take responsibility for their own actions!?!


Jim Thornable
said
0 0

One more reason to go to the Pay As You Go System


Sandra
said
0 0

When will people stop trying to litigate their way out of the consequences of their behaviour and conduct. How can anyone honestly believe that Rogers' billing practices can cause marriages to fail???


John
said
0 0

Listen: forget the fact that this woman cheated on her husband. The fact remains that Rogers breached a contract and at the same time violated the privacy of one of their customers. I think that is the major issue here. Yes, it was wrong for her to cheat on her husband. Yes, she probably would have got caught eventually. But the fact that here personal information was released without her consent and the fact that her contract was breached is completely unacceptable. The fact is, is that if Rogers isn't held accountable for this breach of privacy and contract then it means that any one you could be put in the same situation.


Kaptin
said
0 0

So who is guilty here? Her for having an affair. Big Deal as people do it all the time and she got caught.

What gives Rogers the right to "Bundle" her private account under her maiden name with her husbands new account?

Glad I don't have a Rogers Cell phone account. All the phone sex things they could nail me for ... Oh! I forgot, I'm not married.

Watch it people, soon you will have them snooping where you surf, like they already don't.

Rogers is wrong here as they should never have merged her bill with her husbands without her consent.


Linda
said
0 0

Seems like 90 percent of people responding to this article have 'issues' that have nothing to do with the article. The MAIN point of this article is that "ROGERS VIOLATED CONTRACT LAW.' Anything else (ie the affair) is peanuts, and will be given little consideration by the judge that hears this case. Likely every other household has people living at the same address that are possibly not related, or adult children living with their parents, but the same address alone does not mean each is responsible fof the other's debts or contracts. Rogers had no right to combine two totally different contracts into one, and reveal private and confidential information in the process. Taht violated and breached their contract with the woman, and she has every right to seek punitive redress for this breach of contract and breach of privacy laws. Grow up people, and quit giving all our rights away with your silly knee-jerk reactions. This would be setting a terrible precedence in the courts if she loses her case against Rogers. The sensible thing for Rogers to do would be to settle out of court though.


Mike vdB - Chatham, ON
said
0 0

Aside from getting caught on cheating, the lawsuit is considering whether there was a breach of privacy and contract. With current privacy rules, the account holder can authorize people on the account to make changes and such. A question to consider is did Roger's have the husband authorized on the account? Even if she had it in her maiden name, she at one time could have given that permission and forgot about it. Rogers is not responsible for her stupidity, but are they responsible for breach of privacy and contract? Either way, it doesn't bode well for her because she is not winning in the court of public opinion, which seems to matter more these days than a legal case before the courts.


TDOG
said
0 0

Get real lady You cheeted got caught and are now looking for someone to blame. Buy a mirror and you will see the person who caused you the grief not the phone company. Man we are turning into the USA everyone sueing . People need to take resopnsibility for there actions I hope this gets thrown out of court.


JarJar
said
0 0

The act of cheating isnt up for discussion on this case. Rogers should not of done this without her permission. Just because her husband called he was able to change the account information what is this Iran? There is no way the phone account should of been bundled into the home account or the name changed without the person's permission.
Rogers has the worst customer service in all of Canada. They are so rude and I have to say Im happy they are being brought up on something.
Again, its not about the act of cheating. Rogers needs to stop hiding behind what she was doing (which was wrong) they violated her rights just because her husband called.



Joe Donner
said
0 0

Who cares that she got nailed and caught, (serves her right) I want to know where do I apply for her job? I'd take 100k/year to sit around a desk all day processing rental checks, especially in this economy


truenorth55
said
0 0

I agree with Greg. You have to look past the idiot having an affair and come to the real issue which is privacy. Roger's violated her privacy and there is a law to protect that. The FREEDOM OF INFORMATION and PROTECTION OF PRIVACY ACT.



realist
said
0 0

Why on earth would she have her cell phone bill sent to her house in the first place?


Maggie
said
0 0

I don't think the combining of the bills are that simple. We have three Rogers account at my house and they aren't combined unless one requests it to be and then it's verified by the other person (if that makes sense at all).

Perhaps she thought it would be okay and forgot about covering up the affair.

Regardless, her argument is that Rogers caused her breakup by revealing the affair which is not sound at all. Her marriage broke because of the affair and it would have been revealed eventually.


M.M.B. Ont
said
0 0

Putting aside her affair, Rogers did breach her contract. They have no business revealing info on any customer to another person. If a man and wife have seperate bank accounts, the bank personell are NOT allowed to reveal any info on that account to the other spouse. Our home home with Bell Canada is in my husband's name and if our phone is out of service, my husband has to give Bell permission to speak to me when reporting the problem. The same applies to Ontario Hydro. Unless bills are in joint names, the company should by law respect each customer's privacy. If they don't, then your next door neighbour or anyone for that matter could call in and make requests of your personal info which is wrong. ( Cheaters usually do get caught )


tdgladwin
said
0 0

So basically she wants someone else to take responsibility for her bad acts and unfaithfulness in her marriage. So if she had not been caught by virtue of the bill being sent to her husband she would have continued to be dishonest in her marriage and life style by the sounds of her claim. She in no way can hold Rogers liable for damages to something of which they were unaware was happening or going to be discovered simply by their billing being sent to the home of the husband who had asked for the services to be bundled together in order to save money. She needs to prove that they knowingly caused the breakup of the marriage and then would have foreseen her collapse and poor work performance because of it which then cost her the job which she had lost because of her poor work ethics. She is in no way going too be able to hold the company liable for her loses and yet she in fact could be held liable for obtaining services by fraud because of her using her maiden name to obtain credit to which she also had under another name. Something which is illegal in Canada in the first place.


Greg
said
0 0

She doesn't deserve a dime. Quit blaming other people for your own stupidity.


John Smith
said
0 0

Rogers will pay according to the letter of the law but this woman is a moron. If you didnt want to lose your husband try this - don't cheat on him you retard!!


Sandra
said
0 0

Stupid is...as stupid does.....


Carol
said
0 0

This is a great loop-hole for disgruntled roomates to screw the other one over. All I have to do now is claim that I'm married to the roomate. Name different? That's 'cause we were just married. Yes, put it all under Mr. & Mrs. Smith, and while you're at it, lets activate a few iPhones and iPads. THANKS!


my2¢worth
said
0 0

Well first off the lady should have ended her marriage if it was that terrible. Sorry to hear she was incapable of managing her life but you all know - LIFE is a 4 letter word... But Rogers and Bell are reknowned for their stupid billing practices. I just went through a billing issue with Bell (sheesh those guys do some funky creative accounting).To my way of seeing things - this was to be treated as a seperate account. It was in a different name and thus should not have been combined with her husbands account. Imagine if you had a tenant living with you and their phone bill was included in your account - bet you would be overly happy about that. So Yes Rogers did wrong and should be held accountable - for $600,000 though? Nope.And yes the lady did wrong. It's acutally quite entertaining when you think about it. The lady should write a book and make that money up in this manner.... BUT -> Come on lady - get a grip - move on - your lover was the one who turned you over in reality, not Rogers... all he had to do was keep his mouth shut, I hope you dumped him...


Marilynne Snider
said
0 0

Its funny... but I can't get any information about my husbands medical records without his say so even though we are legally married and share the same name. So why should Rogers be able to bundle accounts together that are in different names( even though legally married) without consent from either party. Whether she was cheating or not is immaterial... privacy laws forbid giving information without consent. Trying accessing a bank account in the other spouse's name... can't be done . Rogers is clearly at fault here and she just might have a good case.


MC
said
0 0

I know very little about contract law, so I don't find myself in a position to comment on the validity of that part of the argument.BUTTo suggest that Rogers 'caused' the end of her marriage and this caused her stress and her loss of job is completely UNBELIEVABLE.If she truly wants to see what caused her to lose her husband, her job, and brought on her stress, there is a simple solution ---- GO LOOK IN THE MIRROR !!!!


Stu
said
0 0

It doesn't say in the article, but whether the bill was in the woman's maiden name or not, her husband may very well have been an authorized user of the account as well. I'm listed in Rogers' system as an authorized user of my fiancee's account, it's a very simple thing. That being the case, I could very easily, legitimately and legally have the billing bundled with my own if I wanted. Just a thought.Oh, and for the guy who feels monogamy is against human nature: Why does it hurt so much when you're cheated on? Is that feeling a result of society telling you you should feel pain?


Max in Vancouver
said
0 0

Roges is correct, they did not mitigate the circumstances that led to the marriage breakup and are not responsible BUT they did unilaterally change the terms of the contract with the woman without her knowledge and approval. They cannot arbitrarily change the contract from her to her husband without her consent. Sorry Rogers, you are going to pay for this one. Most of the posters are indignant over the cheating aspect of the story, rightly so, but contract law is contract law and Rogers has broken the contract.


thetruth1028
said
0 0

So he saved 10% and caught his Wife cheating?? Did he get a good deal or What?.


Bob
said
0 0

How you know what up do you have to be? Why should Rogers be on the look out for customer's who cheat on their spouses? This is the most ridiculous thing i have heard in a while. Basically this woman is asking for compensation for breaking a contract (marriage contract). Ya that makes sense!


Mike
said
0 0

I know very little about contract law, so I don't find myself in a position to comment on the validity of that part of the argument.BUTTo suggest that Rogers 'caused' the end of her marriage and this caused her stress and her loss of job is completely UNBELIEVABLE.If she truly wants to see what caused her to lose her husband, her job, and brought on her stress, there is a simple solution ---- GO LOOK IN THE MIRROR !!!!


Kevin
said
0 0

You people are missing the point. This is a breach of privacy and contract. Rogers had no right to do what they did.


Sylvie Smith - Ottawa
said
0 0

YOU NEED TO THINK ABOUT THIS ONE PEOPLE: I agree that this woman is immoral but that is not the point here. As another poster mentioned, what if it wasn't an affair? What if she was talking to someone about getting help to leave an abusive relationship??? Guess what would have happened to her then - a good beating I'm sure. Would you hold Rogers responsible then for breaching her privacy? You're all stuck on the fact that she had an affair, try to apply what happened to another circumstance and you might understand that what Rogers did WAS ABSOLUTELY WRONG!!!!


Doug
said
0 0

Some of you are trying to pretend your staying above the "emotion" but your missing the point yourselves.The affair is NOT a red herring since she is using that in seeking for emotional damages. Rogers may have violated privacy laws but they are not responsible for her marriage breakdown.


Christian, NL
said
0 0

What you do in the dark in secret will be revealed for all to see in the light, serves you right! You reap what you sow lady, now accept the consequences.


Falderal
said
0 0

Wow...she's really playing up the whole victim thing. Her affair is somehow not the cause of the problem, only its disclosure. Are we to then assume that she carries any number of other secrets that are harmless until exposed? She's a liar and self centred. Her testimony then, should be seen for its entertainment value, as that's about all its worth.


Rick in NB, Ste Marie
said
0 0

It's got nothing to do with marriage. With her signature, she and Rogers entered a private contract. Therefore all transactions are between her and Rogers. Until there is a warrent, nobody, not even the law can have access to her records. Rogers is at fault. All you good people have a point when you say the marriage was probably over, but that is not the issue. If morals had anything to do with the law, over half of the world's financial giants would be behind bars. Religion and the state never see eye to eye, and never should.


heartbreaker8000
said
0 0

If this is a breach of contract issue, then perhaps the husband has a case against his wife. Marriage is a contract too, signed in front of witnesses and an official. Perhaps he too has a case for damages. I think his case trumps hers!


Gregg from Picton
said
0 0

The injury to Ms. Nagy was caused by Rogers communication alteration of an existing contract and the breach of a reasonable expectation of privacy by the company. From a legal standpoint it is cut and dried and Rogers should be held accountable. I hope Ms. Nagy is successful in her suit, but be prepared for serious legal bullying from this company’s legal department.This behaviour is typical of Rogers communications. They are well known in the industry for unilaterally altering the terms of their services in their own favour; contracts mean nothing to this company and I avoid them like the plague.Buy a disposable cell for the next one Gabriella, or better yet just remain faithful…


Kris
said
0 0

Way to go Rogers! She should continue to stay miserable for a long time.


Portes
said
0 0

DUH!!! A no brain-er, this woman needs help in the worst way and she complains about her husband leaving her. I guess she wants fast cash and thinks this is the way to get it. Her lawyer should also take a leap off a short pier


Fred - Brandon MB
said
0 0

What nonsense. She is the author of her own demise, and shouldn't be trying to pin her troubles on Rogers. It's not as if they were two unrelated single people sharing a living space. They were a married couple. If the courts place any blame on Rogers I'll be outraged.


Lz in Edmonton
said
0 0

Two things. One, if Rodgers combines phone bills of non-partnered people, aka, people that live in the same household but are not related, they broke the law of privacy. Since they combined "related" parties by the laws of marriage, aka a business partnership, they broke NO law. The one thing that might bite Rodgers is not getting "her concent" first and that I will agree with. However, the pain and sufferring she is obviously going for in asking $600,000 has nothing to do with the fact that her "rights" were violated or that concent wasn't given. It has to do with the fact that she was STUPID. All she deserves is perhaps a refund on her bill. Rodgers would need to be fined under government privacy laws, not a lawsuit for being stupid. For that, she won that one.


jak
said
0 0

Typical of the misandry climate in North America: If a man has an affair aka Tiger Woods or Jessie James he is a villian and takes it on the chin but if a woman does she is a victem.... again..... Can you imagine the outrage by "feminist" groups if a man pulled this stunt. So much for equality.


Ted
said
0 0

Those who play will pay.....


Dr. M
said
0 0

She may have a case based on breach of contract, but not for the breakup of her marriage. None of those consequences would have attended the change in the billing if she hadn't been having the affair. Remember when Tiger Woods was caught, how many females posted comments saying that cheating was something that men did because they were programmed that way? Turns out that women cheat as much as men, but no one better claim that women are programmed that way. That would be sexist.


DJ Poe
said
0 0

That's exactly how I got my wife cheating which is a good thing. She was Nothing More than a Liar and Fraud and was pulling this crap on Men for decades. Good Job Rogers! lol


Frank
said
0 0

She says I made a mistake and I rectified it! She rectified it after she saw caught!! Don't try to rationalize your way out! It was YOUR fault and on one else.


Jonathan
said
0 0

Tough one for the courts. They need to find a way to punish Rogers (even a one-time warning would satisfy me) and the woman. Here's to hoping she gets the more bitter end of the stick for trying to blame others for her infidelity.


Graeme
said
0 0

MAL of TO and Greg have it correct. The affair part of this is kind of funny and makes the woman seem like the guilty party. But forget for a second the specific context of the story, and look at a similar situation like MAL of TO's, Roger's very well may be guilty here. If someone asks you to shoot them with a gun, it is still a crime for you to do so (even though they stupidly asked for it). Stupidity by one party does not automatically mean the other party is above the law. Even though I don't believe this woman should be entitled to damages, a guilty finding would at least hopefully lead to Rogers improving their practices.


jonny
said
0 0

The only valid comment submitted here is the one posted by GREG. It's time for Mr Joe Public to become familiar with contract law. Rogers violated this woman's contract with their corporation. Privacy and contract law is there for a reason. Leave the emotion out of your thought process and get educated on the law!


bc grrl
said
0 0

she is having the bills sent to her maiden name, that shows intent. what an idiot, she gives good women a bad name...fyi, there are thousands of good women who will not cheat on their husbands and who will have to pay higher bills because of these cheaters! like lorna purdy...i call a human rights violation...but my has base and merit, i don't like that stupid women are being used as a model for all women. it is violation of my rights to be bundled in (like rogers did) with twits like this!


LC
said
0 0

Most of you are missing the point here, yes she was wrong for lying and cheating on her husband and there's no excuse for that, but Rogers did breach the contract and privacy terms it had with her. This is not acceptible. No one should have access to your private records without your permission and/or knowledge.


Nanook
said
0 0

Was she dating ROGER???


Graeme
said
0 0

I don't know if Rogers is guilty here (I don't know the law between spouses, so I'm not sure if they were allowed to do what they did), However, if they are guilty (and this woman's stupidity should have no part in that), hopefully they give $0 in damages to this woman.


Dave
said
0 0

You guys posting here ... 50% of you are hypocrites. You have or or have cheated in the past. It happens all the time, it's unfortunate and a fact of life.Let her live her life in peace. You have no idea what is her situation.Davep.s. If society didn't brainwash us to "have" to be monogamous (which completely goes against human nature), maybe many less people would get hurt since expectations would be less.p.s.2: Bashing this person is easy. Standing up to the common norm - that's difficult and that takes guts.


WESTERNER
said
0 0

CHEATERS never win - she was stupid running around with another man while having TWO children at home. What were you doing 'DOUBLE DIPPING" for your greedy self without thinking of the kids and what would happen. If your Marriage was that bad "Divorce"!


jeremy
said
0 0

my goodness. This is what is wrong with alot of people today, too much pointing of the old perverbial finger. Take responsibility for your own actions lady. Maybe you will use a payphone next time.


Lz in Edmonton
said
0 0

Rule number 1. When you are married, the laws state you are one and the same. It is a business partnership by any other name. Rodgers only combined the bills even though it was in her maiden name, it doesn't negate the fact that she was MARRIED and therefor, the accounts can be merged. How gracious of her then husband to combine the bills and then start paying for them... there was no mallice in that. The fact that she was fooling around during the partnership and the consequence that her husband found out by combining the bills is irrelavent. Rodgers was doing what the other partner requested as the laws treat husband and wife as one. Anyhow, she is obviously still passing the buck for her indiscretions. Too bad, so sad..... go get a job and suck it up princess.


a.
said
0 0

Why do so many people refuse to take responsibility for their actions, and the consequences they bring?! Ms. Nagy made a choice to deceive her husband, have an affair and break her vows. Ms. Nagy continues to demonstrate an inability to accept responsibility for herself by blaming Rogers for the dissolution of her marriage - will she also blame Rogers for the pain and suffering the affair undoubtedly caused her children? At what point will Ms. Nagy stand up and admit she made choices that had a negative impact on her own life, and that she and she alone was responsible for such actions and their consequences?


Frank Buchan
said
0 0

Several bills come in my name; my spouse can open any of them she likes. Heck, she can even review my cell phone records if she wants. I'm pretty confident since I'm not cheating on her, it won't lead to my marriage breaking up.What some people won't do to avoid taking personal responsibility for their own bad decisions shocks me to no end.


Al in Calgary
said
0 0

So this woman was cheating on her husband, he found out, and none of it is her fault.Typical of people who cheat, they never take responsibility for the devastation and pain they cause. It is always someone else's fault.I hope Rogers adds financial hardship to the list of problems this woman has.


Niagara Guy
said
0 0

HAHA!!! Classic! Good for Rogers!


Christine
said
0 0

Seems to me that her marriage was over long before her husband left. Why else would she be having an affair? Can't wait for the time when people step up and take responsibility for their own actions. Why sue Rogers? They didn't force her to have an affair. If she really wanted to keep the affair secret why would she have her phone bills delivered to her house, no matter which name they were addressed to? Why would her work suffer (to the point of getting fired) once her husband left her? Looks like she was a good multitasker before she got caught - juggling a job, affair and marriage all at once. I'll bet her work suffered more from embarrassment than stress. Canada's court system is looking like the Americans every day. Sue, sue, sue.


JL in Oshawa
said
0 0

Yet another example of someone unable to accept the consequences of their own actions. Instead of taking responsibility for her affair she is blaming an itemized bill for revealing her infidelity to her husband. And if she wins this ridiculous lawsuit all of our cable bills will go up as a result. Are we becoming as litigious as the U.S. when it comes to suing companies for our own mistakes?


dave
said
0 0

My god this woman was cheating on her husband and its rogers fault. Maybe this so called lady needs to get in front of a mirror and see whos really to blame.


Poops McWillie
said
0 0

This woman is an idiot. I hope her 'lover' also leaves her. She's high maintenance.


Brian fr Langley
said
0 0

Wow, I've heard everything, lying and cheating didn't end this marriage, Rogers did. This is what happens when we turn ourselves into a society of victims. The pain is no doubt real and extreme, not just to the Plaintiff but to her (poor) husband and children. Some one here just learned the hard way (and is still in disbelief no doubt) that actions carry consequences.


Jim
said
0 0

Talk about your basic lack of responsibility. She is cheating on her husband, she gets caught, and its someone else's fault? As for her work performance suffering...she wasn't worried about it when she was cheating and lying to her husband, so why should it bother her when it came to light and all the stress of lying on a regular basis is eliminated?


Greg
said
0 0

Forget the infidelity, this is a red herring. The important thing here isn’t even privacy, its contract law.The woman had a contract in her name with Rogers, Rogers abused and broke that contract.I imagine it happened something like this: The Rogers agent noticed two accounts with different names at the same address and asked the person he was speaking with if they knew this other account holder. This was the first breach of contract, giving away personal information. Then, when they said “thats my wife” the agent took that information at face value, and with no possible way of confirming that this information was true, terminated her contact and created a new contract with her “husband”.Now imagine you are a student, or someone else sharing a house, or renting a room in a shared household (which, BTY is a lot of people under 30). Now Rogers notices that there are several people with different names and separate contracts living at the same address and starts asking someone you live with questions about you. What if they say they are your husband or wife? See where this is going?What if the information the "husband" gleaned from the bill has nothing to do with an affair, but still caused damages? What if they were going to split up and was speaking to an attorney, or the spouse was trying get help escaping an abusive relationship?If Rogers isn’t taken to task for this breach of contract, then it sets a precedent for all corporations in Ontario; that it’s okay to give their customer’s information to another customer and change their contract without getting their approval.


Bruce - Ottawa
said
0 0

Oh boo hoo! Theis woman seems to have an excuse for her poor judgement. I guess her marriage vows didnt mean anything to her - so it must be Rogers fault! I'm surprised she wasnt drinking a McDonald coffe and the shock of this caused her to spill coffe on herself, maybe she could have sued McDonalds too - the woman looks like an idiot!


keith
said
0 0

Probably would have been a nin issue if she wasn't cheating. Quit blaming other people for your problems lady.


MAL of TO
said
0 0

Been There. Not an affair but Rogers has bundled our telephone under our tenants cable and cell package and switched the phone to his name. He owes creditors who continuously call me on our phone and claim it doesn't matter since it is in his name now. Moving back to Bell when the neighborhood upgrades are done this fall. Since Ted passed, Rogers has become a piece of crap laying off employees and dumping services.


John
said
0 0

Unbelievable, She should not get a dime from Rogers.She cheated on her husband and I can tell you, that eventually he would have found out, with or without Rogers.CHEATERS WILL BE CAUGHT!!!


GMan
said
0 0

No wonder your husband left you. You're an idiot.


bigboss031483
said
0 0

Serves her right! Only a matter of time till you were caught.


Frank
said
0 0

So typical. She get's busted but turns it around to being an alleged victim. I can't believe that she thinks her rights were violated. If you did not want this, then don't have an affair.


Raj
said
0 0

They often bundle bills together, maybe she should have gone though another company.Sneaking around like that, I feel for her significant other.I suspect it was no picnic him finding out ths way.If you want to have an extramarital affair, you take chances .


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Top Stories

Luka Rocco Magnotta, the subject of a Canada-wide search warrant, is shown during an audition for the reality TV show 'Cover Guy' in 2007.

Murder suspect auditioned for reality TV show

More   48 Comments 48    20 Video(s) 20

Gabriel Nadeau Dubois of the CLASSE, centre right, responds to reporters questions after negotiations came to a dead-end with Quebec's minister of education at the legislature in Quebec City on Thursday, May 31, 2012. (Jacques Boissinot / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Talks between Quebec gov't, students collapse

More  4 Video(s) 4