News Sections
Perfumes filled with unknown chemicals, group alleges
CTV News Video
|
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Tue. May. 11 2010 11:01 PM ET
A prominent environmental group says perfume makers stink when it comes to divulging the potentially dangerous chemicals in their products.
Environmental Defence, along with the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics, commissioned a study of perfumes sold in Canada. The group says the study shows that perfumes often contain a dozen of what it calls "secret chemicals" not listed on labels -- chemicals that can trigger allergic reactions or disrupt hormones.
The group tested 17 name-brand perfumes colognes and "body sprays" for men and women:
- Giorgio Armani Acqua Di Gio
- Jennifer Lopez J. Lo Glow
- Calvin Klein Eternity (for women)
- Bath & Body Works Japanese Cherry Blossom
- Britney Spears Curious
- Calvin Klein Eternity (for men)
- Quiksilver (for men)
- Victoria's Secret Dream Angels Heavenly
- Coco Mademoiselle Chanel
- Clinique Happy
- Abercrombie & Fitch Fierce
- American Eagle Seventy Seven
- Hannah Montana Secret Celebrity
- Dolce & Gabbana Light Blue
- Old Spice After Hours Body Spray
- AXE Bodyspray For Men - Shock
- Halle by Halle Berry
All of them contained secret chemicals not listed on the label. On average, they contained 14 chemicals, some are which have been linked to estrogen disruption, sperm production disruption and even cancer, the group says.
According to the study, Calvin Klein Eternity perfume for women, for example, contained 14 unlisted chemicals. Giorgio Armani Aqua Di Gio for men had 17 chemicals, while American Eagle 77 spray contained 24 unlisted chemicals.
The study found the perfumes also contained an average of 10 "sensitizing" chemicals, which are chemicals that can trigger allergic reactions, such as nausea, headaches, wheezing, and vomiting.
The questionable chemicals include:
- Octinoxate
- Oxybenzone
- Benzophenone
- Diethyl phthalate (DEP)
- Butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT)
- Galaxoide
- Tonalide
- Musk ketone
- Benzyl salicylate
- Benzyl benzoate
- Butylphenyl methylpropional
The report says that galaxolide and tonalide -- two synthetic musks linked to toxicity to the endocrine system – were found in 16 of the 17 perfumes. A recent cord-blood study by the Environmental Working Group found those two chemicals inside the bodies of most babies tested.
Twelve of the 17 products in this study were listed as containing DEP, a chemical found in 97 per cent of Americans that is linked to abnormal development of reproductive organs in baby boys and sperm damage in adult men.
Jane Houlihan, senior vice president for research at the Environmental Working Group, says these chemicals easily find their way into our bodies.
"Fragrance chemicals are inhaled or absorbed through the skin, and many of them end up inside people's bodies, including pregnant women and newborn babies," she said.
Environmental Defence's Rick Smith says none of the chemicals are specifically labelled, because of a regulatory loophole that allows companies to use the word "fragrance" on their label to protect the fragrances as trade secrets.
"All you have to do is put the word ‘fragrance' on your ingredient list and you can shovel dozens of chemicals into that one word," he says.
"There's no way for people to know what's in their favourite fragrances without sending these products to a laboratory. As a parent, I find that unacceptable," Smith added in a news release.
The group also contends that of the 91 ingredients identified in the study (either by lab tests or product labels), only 19 had been reviewed by the industry-funded Cosmetic Ingredient Review, and only 27 have been assessed by the International Fragrance Association (IFRA) and the Research Institute for Fragrance Materials (RIFM), which develop voluntary standards for chemicals used in fragrance.
Darren Praznik, of the Canadian Cosmetic, Toiletry and Fragrance Association, says the report is flawed.
"None of these ingredients are secret. They are well known," he told CTV News. "They have gone through intensive scrutiny within the industry's suppliers and regulators, like Health Canada to make sure consumers are not put at risk when they are used as intended."
Praznik says most of the products identified in the report are either on the label or are present in infinitesimally small amounts.
"Industry and regulators put a great deal of effort, in fact, in ensuring that ingredients that go into personal care products and fragrances are in fact safe when used as intended," he said.
Environmental Defence say this study kicks off its new "Just Beautiful" campaign, aimed at making cosmetics and personal care products safer and their labels more clear. It comes as the federal government reviews Canada's laws governing cosmetics.
The group also plans to investigate what chemicals might be found in makeup, perfumes, lotions, shampoos and soaps that Canadian families use every day.
The group says their mission is to see better labelling of all chemicals in perfumes, cosmetics and sunscreens -- most of which contain artificial scents -- so that consumers can better decide which to use and which to avoid.
User Tools
Related Stories
Related Websites
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
But they probably get straight As for computer games and TV.
Email
Comments are now closed for this story
Dave
said
esther
said
gingin
said
Muneeba Siddiqui
said
former lauder lady
said
Melinda
said
Gray
said
Earthwatcher
said
Christine
said
Sylvia
said
No chemicals, preservatives, fillers, binders, exenders, syntheitcs, colorings, or anything else that would harm the person using them. These oils are aromatic as well as medicinal. Therapeutic essential oils were the first medicine know and I would welcome anyone on board to try this incredible mode of natural health. By the way, I am not talking about aromatherapy. Feel free to contact me if you want to learn more truth about the power of essential oils and the value of their scents.
Theresa
said
Sylvia
said
I custom blend all 100% natural perfumes using only that what nature has provided for us. It is simply joyful and health promoting at the same time.
gnflen
said
We absolutely deserve to know what's in our products and to have proper regulation (and not some industry-funded panel, which is the case now) of them.
And we certainly shouldn't have to be chemists to figure out what to buy in the beauty aisle. I recommend you all visit and join the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics, www.safecosmetics.org and start researching safer alternatives at www.safecosmetics.org/skindeep
Vanessa
said
Unscented in Vancouver
said
I also don't think that labeling will convince people not to wear perfumes. It certainly hasn't worked with food. I would greatly support government intervention to ban harmful chemicals from cosmetic and home "cleaning" products, to name but a few. I want my future kids to grow up happy and healthy, not germ-free but riddled with immune and reproductive issues.
Tesa
said
rouquinne
said
I am reminded of the ONE study published that showed that sunscreen is bad for you in the face of hundreds sayng the opposite. what wasn't divulged is that the study was conducted on artificial skin - which is notorious for giving false-positive results during testing.there is always more to the story than meets the eye.and, no, i don't work in the cosmetics field.
Isabelle
said
Please remember that toxic chemicals in our immediate environment are not limited to perfumes - the same goes for those artificial air fresheners, as well as a range of other household products, including cosmetics, creams, and shampoos.
We need to encourage manufactures who produce perfumes and other household products that are NONtoxic!!
They are out there, but are still a minority (ex: Burt's Bees)
Pheesees
said
At one time perfumes were made of all natural ingredients. Unfortunately, lust for profit at all costs has made this a past practice.
D. Laws
said
Arie
said
Helene
said
M
said
j bean
said
cassy moes
said
Hanna
said
Maplebird
said
Perfume? It's the proverbial tip of the iceberg. But at least Canada has decided to catch up with Europe and start getting rid of at least some of these nasty chemicals.
Canadian
said
kpanta
said
Celine Ferris
said
vivian
said
Joe
said
Vera Griffin
said
Simon
said