Top Stories -   

1

Budget likely to ignore impact of aging population

Baby boomers' incomes helped once helped chop away at the federal deficit, and they will be missed once they start vanishing from the tax rolls.
Baby boomers' incomes helped once helped chop away at the federal deficit, and they will be missed once they start vanishing from the tax rolls.

View Larger Image

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (34)Add Comments Facebook   

Selected Comment

The sky is falling! The sky is falling! Get a grip. The budget isn't meant to deal with every problem over the next 30 years. The aging boomer issue isn't new. Governments have know about it for decades. They'll deal with it. Enough with the hysterical back seat driving.

SpinMeNot

Budget likely to ignore impact of aging population

talking about
Budget likely to ignore impact of aging population

Date: Wednesday Mar. 3, 2010 8:45 AM ET

Most of the substance of Thursday's federal budget will centre on spending cuts and the growing deficit, but experts say the government is ignoring the demographic elephant in the room: the looming effect of an aging Canadian population on federal finances.

"It's a little like seeing a great big glacier coming down the valley," says William Robson, analyst with the C.D. Howe Institute. "It doesn't seem particularly urgent because it isn't moving very quickly … but once it arrives it sure changes the landscape."

The national fertility rate has fallen from a peak of 3.9 children per woman at the tail of the baby boom to 1.5 children per woman now.

Meanwhile, life expectancy has risen to 80.7 years in 2006, from 58 years in 1926. By 2019, individuals over the age of 65 are expected to account for more than a quarter of the population; and by 2029, more than a third.

Tina Kremmidas, chief economist for the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, says the recession and rising unemployment has diverted attention from the population shift those figures represent and the coming shortages in the labour market they will create.

In a pre-budget report, entitled "Recession, Recovery and the Future Evolution of the Labour Market," she warns that Canada's aging population created shortages before the recession and those will resurface when the economy recovers.

"Labour shortages are not a huge issue now, but as the recovery progresses they will return," she says. "Before the recession hit, 36 per cent of businesses in Canada reported some kind of labour shortage … that's only going to get worse."

Robson says that this year represents the peak of Canada's percentage of 18 to 64 year olds -- the prime age group for the workforce. "This is the highest this age group has ever been and it's as high as it ever will be," he said.

"It's all downhill after this year."

Having such a large percentage of the population in the workforce, especially with the baby boomers in their prime wage and salary earning years, helped drive up government revenue in the late 1990s. That, in turn, helped eliminate the federal deficit.

"Now we've hit the high point and we're going to fall down the other side a lot faster than we rose," says Robson.

Yet Kremmidas does not expect such issues to be a major, or even minor theme of this year's federal budget. "There are some key structural problems that have to be addressed that haven't been addressed … and there's no guarantee that the budget will begin to address them."

She says governments have so far been slow to react to the challenges posed by demographic changes in the workforce. "Governments, and not just the current government, tend to focus short term," she says.

"Their focus is on winning the next election. This is a very long-term issue ... [and] governments need to think more long-term."

With the birth rate falling, governments at every level need to start coming up with ways to expanding participation in the workforce by seniors, aboriginals, the disabled and immigrants, Kremmidas says.

"We need to expand Canada's labour force if we want the Canadian economy to continue to grow."

Sylvain Schetagne, of the Canadian Labour Congress, agrees that more needs to be done to address the problems caused by a slow in the growth of the labour force and the aging of our population.

"Governments have to start doing something about this, not only at the federal level, but also at the provincial level," he says. "There's going to be some major challenges."

He says the federal budget should recognize this by introducing measures to improve access to education and retraining and to better absorb immigrants into the workforce. But it must also work on improving pensions, which will be of greater importance every year that the percentage of Canadians hitting retirement age increases.

"Their focus has been on balancing the books; balancing the books," he says. "Unfortunately that doesn't do much to address these problems."

The parliamentary budget watchdog has already warned the government that it faces a battle with the provinces over health-care spending because of Canada's greying population.

"The major demographic transition that is underway in Canada will strain governments' finances over the next several decades," states a report issued last week by Parliamentary Budget Officer Kevin Page.

"Aging will move an increasing share of the population out of their prime working-age years and into their retirement years. With an older population, spending pressures in areas such as health care and elderly benefits are projected to increase. At the same time, slower labour force growth is projected to restrain growth in the economy, which will slow the growth of the general tax base."

The report suggested the resulting strain on federal finances will be most pronounced in health care, as services for Canadian seniors account for a larger and larger share of federal spending.

If transfer payments to the provinces to pay for this health-care are allowed to grow at their current rate, the federal government will have to raise taxes or cut spending by nearly $30 billion in the next budget to keep the deficit in check.

In addition to health transfers, a number of other federal programs are expected to face cost pressures, including Old Age Security and the Guaranteed Income Supplement.

1

Add New Comment ( )

David
said

I am retired and see many people I grew up with totally disregard any retirement plans, They spent like drunken sailors and lived beyond their means. Now they are retired and have nothing, do you think It is reasonable that I should now support these people, through high taxes? I think that ,"you made your bed, you lie in it".


Dave
said

New Canadian: You do know that because you are a Muslim It is not manditory for you to vote Liberal, you are free to vote for any party that you wish, In fact the Liberals and NDP are more likely to give your hard earned money to someone else when they tax you.


Obama WIns
said

If this was anticipated when this lot of them were around when the unemployment rate not even 15 years ago was much higher, then why is there a panic about today? Example is the american unemployment rate is at least close to 20% and they have similar population dynamics. This doesn't make sense even if true here and internationally.


The Blind Assassin
said

I think this country would save a lot of money if they deported people like this woman I encountered the other day.Before you declare that statement an ignorant one, I'll mention that she had a British accent and was just as white as I am.I was out having dinner when she complained about her order and demanded not to pay for it.Luckily they didn't give in, but what she said after that really infuriated me.She said that she's on 'social assistance' and that she refuses to work because she doesn't want to pay taxes!How the hell was someone like that approved in the first place?People like this are the problem, not the hard working ones who deserve to retire in comfort.


Chris in Ontariariari-Oh!
said

The federal government has alway's increased immigration number's in the past in order to fill labour shortfall's so I doubt that problem will be as critical as the great "pundit's" will have you believe. I recall in the mid 80's there was a huge demand for skilled trade's and there were a lot of people from the former east bloc countries that came to work in the auto industry.There is no doubt there will be a squeeze on the finance's as these people get older but if the country isn't overburdened with useless social program's that only benefit a few at the expense of the many we should manage.The greatest challenge we face is the necessary improvement's in our competitiveness as we are lagging in productivity with our main competitor's.The government need's to provide an economic environment that is open to business and does not over tax them out of the country.Government should not be there to coddle those unwilling to contribute to our society but provide assistance to those that do.As they say a hand up not a hand out.'


Brusmit J
said

How about the 75 BILLION Harper gave to the banks 4 days before the last election they pay it back. It is reported all over the huge profits banks are making so pay it back and we are DEFICIT FREE


Shockwave
said

Young people, from 30 somethings under, have been treated like dirt, being given none of the opportunities that the boomers had in spades, namely affordable education and a crushed manufacturing industry. It's all coming to a head now that the boomers are retiring and generation X and under, working at minimum wage McJobs have to pick up the tab. Good luck collecting.


MARG MM
said

To the poster who said "I am a Muslim, so I vote Liberal". Does that mean that all Muslims must vote Liberal? If so, why? Canada is a free democratic country where people should not be told how to vote. Everyone has the freedom to chose who they vote for, and if that is not the case, something is seroiusly wrong.As to the aging boomers, they have contributed greatly to Canada, and still will contribute while they are retired. Thankfully, it seems that the boomer generation has thought ahead and invested for their retirement. Unfortunatly, that doesn't seem to be the case any longer, as the younger generation wants all the "toys" now, and thinking forward to the future doesn't seem to be a priority.


Frank Buchan
said

Apparently the next manufactured political distraction will pit baby boomers against everyone else. Lovely how we're all dense enough to fall for that malarkey.The reality of fiscal governance is that we have programs that cannot be sustained based upon population dynamics, regardless of immigration. Rather than end up at each other's throats, we would be better to work together to attack the actual problems, rather than moan about symptoms.And to those baby boomers who want to be righteous about the taxes they paid all those years, consider the deficits and debts from all those very same years. At some point, strike a balance between entitlement and actual cost, and you find that the whole society has been at the trough for so long we no longer have wiggle room. It's fairly easy to understand why a 30-something trying to raise a family is irritated that their children's grandchildren will be paying off present debt.You can either plan change, or be decked by it. Sadly, we seem ignorant of managing at all.


Jim - North Saanich, BC
said

I'm now 70 years old and I'm still working essentially full-time and will likely continue to do so for a many years to come not because I particularly want to but have to. There are all too many out there like me who have had the bulk of their retirement savings go out the window in the last economic meltdown but we have also paid and still continue to pay exorbitant levels of taxation which virtually preclude any means to real savings. Never having been a government employee, I don't have a nicely indexed pension paid for by the taxpayers. CPP and OAS are irrelevant as one is taxed at over 50% as income and the other is clawed back entirely.I would suggest that the government really doesn't need to worry about the aging population as most of us are going to still be working and be highly taxed. We will still contribute to the coffers likely in ever increasing, not decreasing, amounts to fill the financial hole created by government over-reaction to the mass hysteria over the recent economic downturn. My greatest fear is over-taxation to compensate for overspending coupled with ensuing hyper-inflation and what that is likely to do come the day I actually have to put down the shovel. Hopefully I won't be around for very long thereafter when that day comes..No worries nice people, we seniors will still be contributing to the coffers as many of us don't have a choice and therefore you really don't have to worry about us becoming an economic burden.


Adam Miller
said

I completely agree with spinmenot....I was learning about this in high school, more than 15 years ago!!!!So for all of you morons that dont want immigrants taking the jobs, use your head....its the only option left...birth control made it impossible to have more that 2.2 kids per family (3 is needed to properly maintain the population), and to top it off, both the federal and provinvial governments did nothing to address this issue...


Jim McB
said

As a senior I resent being written off as a productive citizen of this country by journalists and young whipersnappers in some cloistered institute. I planned for my retirement and paid for it while I was working. I pay taxes and am active in the community and do tons of volunteer work as well as making sure the family is secure and planning for their futures as well.I don't like to be grouped with the social burdens, most who have been in that mode all their lives and who fostered the idea that others would look after them so they could do what they wanted when they wanted. Now the socialists tell me they were right.It is not the aged that is the problem, it is the freeloaders in many cases put on that train by socialist politicians tellling them that a vote for them was their ticket to salvation. Those who made the promises are now living on their fat pensions and the rest of us have to pony up the cash. You have to remember one thing about politicians - they are always paid for their public service, you on the other hand get to pay to be a volunteer!


Mead
said

20 years ago I had a tough time getting a professional career going - the boomers had all the jobs tied up and unemployment was high. After a late start career - now I have to support their freakin retirement !!! Why don't the boomers pay their own bills, for once.


SK Aging Man
said

Sorry, but what would you want to do? Spend billions of dollars on more nonsense?


simon
said

Unfortunately, this Budget will be about Justifying the Prorogation and Winning the next Election. Full of Partisanship, this budget will leave many people out in the cold. This is how Politics has evolved in Ottawa. It is rather Sad and Unfortunate.


Doug # BC
said

I can't believe "Stephan Martin" thinks most people will believe the dribble he posted.What a load of partisan nonsense. Now,to be fair,I am awaiting the results of the Liberal policy convention that is supposed to be coming.Since I am no big fan of the current government,I try to remain pen minded.But with the kind of "spin" posted by "Mr.Martin",it looks like the Liberals have leaned nothing from being sent to the opposition benches. Harper,warts and all,is still the ONLY national party leader who has been consistant about the need to lower debt in Canada.He is the ONLY national leader who knows we need to be more competetive in world markets.The ONLY national leader who knows we need lower taxes to help keep industry running.The ONLY national leader who knows we need to be present,and involved in global affairs,no matter where or how they unfold. And finally,Liberals who claim it was their party who eliminated the debt have re -written history, and left out the pertinent facts.Like it was the much hated Brian Mulroney who have the Fiberals the GST and FTA,that brought more money to Ottawa than anyone could have ever imagined.The rest of the Liberal money in those days,came through theft.Theft from pension plans,from taxpayers,and from provinces.The provincial cut backs are the primary cause of health care funding problems. Can the Conservatives move us in the right direction?? I am not sure. I do know,however,that the socialist Liberals (aka NDP Lite) certainly will not. Therefore,nothwithstanding his faults,I am still certain that PM Harper is the best bet,and should be given a fair shot at meeting the goals he has laid out for many years.


allan
said

Boomers will solve their own problems by dying in the next 20-30 years, so concentrate on the immediate needs--I am a boomer also


PBW
said

Now we have to wake up to the fact of retiring boomers. Although some will continue to work and enjoy working, others will retire and try to live on their pensions. However, some of those pension funds were raided (while governments did nothing) by corporations seeking to boost their profits. Others were underfunded - and still are - because on side or the other (labor or management) decided that they deserved to pay less into the fund than was equitable; in fact, PSAC members, government employees, have paid less than half of their pension, while the taxpayer has to pick up more than half - definitely inequitable to the taxpayers, who may have pension problems of their own! Coorporations, unions and governments should get back to the root meaning of equitable. And some of those inadequate pension plans were the result of "surplus" funds being raided to balance budgets under the reign of the Liberals. The spectre of tax raises is there: if not this year then next, simply in order to keep healthcare transfer flowing, if nothing else. Long-term thinking has to become a habit for all, from youngsters taking on college debt through workers trying to build up pension savings through to governments who should be defining better ways to ensure the retired can rely on a reasonable, properly financed pension.


KJ in Kingston Ontario
said

Why worry -- as long as the Baby Boomers work --- and of course PAY MORE TAXES IN, THAN THE BENEFITS THEY RECEIVE OUT -- until they are about 80 -- everything will work out just fine.... When people with masters degrees in computer science haven't worked in 8 months, I am thinking this labour shortage is the glacier -- and that it is sure to be melted away by the global warming...


Wiser010
said

They will figure out a way to tax us after we are gone!


Patricia
said

To New Canadian...you have much to learn about life in Canada and how Canadians believe in looking out for each other. Contrary to what you may believe, the party which is in power right now does not represent the wishes of the majority of Canadians. You too, in time, will be looked out for since Canada is a kinder gentler nation and believes that everyone is important and will get support when they need it. A me me attitude is selfish and destructive. We are all in this thing called life together and must all look out for each other. Those who have pensions worked hard at getting them and labour laws were passed to keep society civil. It will be up to you, as the next generation, to work hard at keeping society civil so you, at the end of your working life, will benefit too and not have to worry.


George in Calgary
said

Interesting that one poster commented on the picture at the top of the article. The media makes everyone believe that at age 65 one graduates from the flashy sports cars to a wheeled walker complete with flowers (I think the new VW Bug comes with a flower holder). How out of touch the media seems to be. I agree with one poster who states that they enjoy sports and yes still works after the "standard" retirement age. How can anyone retire these days when their investments essentially tanked? After all it is the older group in the work force that truely know how to work. The young kids (anywhere from 18 to 30) have in general a very poor work ethic brought on by their non-baby boomer parents. Work a few weeks and then get EI who cares about a roof over their heads because they still live at home. Their parents are in effect adult child abusers for not kicking them out of the nest at age 18.


Spencer
said

Everyone talks about the costs associated with an aging population, but few people mention the savings. An older population will mean lower crime rates and lower costs for police, courts, and prisons; lower education costs; fewer people claiming the Child Tax Credit; less inflationary pressure on the housing market; less drug and alcohol abuse; reduced traffic during rush hour; etc. It also means people will make taxable withdrawals from their RRSPs, generating government revenue.


Sandy NS
said

And so it begins.Every armchair critic and talking head will have an opinion, and they will be right and the PM wont be.is it any wonder that we become cynical or ignore the media?


Carl
said

I agree that the demographic shift is going to cause a major fiscal crunch. That is why the government should slash wasteful spending. It could start by selling off heavily subsidized Crown Corporations like VIA Rail, and shutting down others. Then it should eliminate all the regional development agencies like FEDNOR, ACOA, WD and the new one for southern Ontario. These expensive bureaucracies do more harm than good, doling out patronage to non-viable business ventures at the expense of taxpayers and viable businesses. The government should also eliminate spending on useless appointees and bureaucratic bodies like Status of Women Canada, Rights and Democracy, the National Rountable on the Environment and the Economy, and countless others. MPs could gain the political capital necessary to make all these cuts by making some sacrifices themselves. In particular, they should cut back their own pension benefits and shut down all the Parliamentary associations that organize international travel junkets.


Max in Vancouver
said

People are living longer and they are healthier. You assume that everyone stops working when they are 65. WRONG. The workforce will consist of more senior people working. And, because the jobs are less physically demanding, the seniors will be contributing quite well. Baby boomers will be withdrawing their RRSPs in the billions, contributing to the tax base for the government. I don't understand why the media fuels the "sky is falling" stories and tries to incite panic. The picture at the top of this article shows a man pushing a walker. Well, guess what, I'm a senior and I play ball, ski and run and I work.


Vote NDP in the next federal provincial election
said

We need to plan for the long term instead of short term gain which doesn't address the larger issues. We all know for a fact that in 10 years there will be mass retirements, labour shortages, demand for health care increases etc...... If we don't plan now then we're going to face many crises whether health, fiscal, etc....


Patricia
said

Governments ignore the aging baby boomers at their own peril. This is the demographic which votes the most and these folks will be carefully monitoring what governments do to look out for their interestsStephen Harper's headset seems to be that everyone can afford to look out for themselves and if you cannot look out for yourself then it is your own fault. He is a man leading a party as blinkered as he is, oblivious to the fact that life is not always fair and not everyone who has worked hard is wealthy. He better watch out or he will be sent packing from Ottawa to be replaced by a political party which has more insight and compassion.


New Canadian, Pensions to be Cut Later
said

France is about to increase pension age from age 60 to 68 as the rest of Europe has. The post war baby boomers are like a big rat in the hose paying tax about to come out on the pension collecting side. Pension age increase is coming no matter who is in power so plan accordingly. The new Canadian immigration has replaced natural offspring growth and we will vote in the future when we have the majoritity in Canada to cut those pensions. As a Muslim I vote Liberal but there is no way I am going to pay high tax forever to give my paycheque to somebody else, I don't have a pension so don't count on me for yours.


retdhairy
said

From what I read on these sites this government just can't get anything right, and therein lies the problem. It is not about government looking after us, it is about us looking after ourselves. I am an adult and therefore I am expected to act like one. To me that entails planning for all stages of my life including retirement. If more people used the financial tools available to all (RRSPs, TFSAs etc) we would not need OAS, CPP, GIS or any other government run taxpayer funded safety nets. If we did not have to pay for these crutches we would cut our taxes by tens of billions of dollars. It would be a simple matter of a compulsory contribution to your pension plan (RRSP) from the first day on the job to the last day one the job. As much as you can afford for your entire work life towards your own retirement. It is that simple, stand up, start taking care of yourselves so the government (read the taxpayers of this country) don't have to.


Prof. Pye Chartt
said

One of the Canadian government's "secret" weapons has always been IMMIGRATION. If you don't believe that this constitutes a MAJOR federal economic policy quietly utilized, you're an out-of-touch fool. (What do you think has been a major driving force in certain major Canadian real estate markets? Do you think that the population of the Greater Toronto Area, for example, exploded over the last 10 years based upon domestic procreation?) As we speak, folks, our government is employing an immigration STRATEGY seen as a 75% solution to the pending problem. Don't kid yourself. Immigration is a primary tool on Ottawa's belt; and always has been. Xenophobic concerns (within the media and the federal government) keep this economic policy in a dimly lit corner.


SpinMeNot
said

The sky is falling! The sky is falling! Get a grip. The budget isn't meant to deal with every problem over the next 30 years. The aging boomer issue isn't new. Governments have know about it for decades. They'll deal with it. Enough with the hysterical back seat driving.


GTA
said

How's that Coalition forced stimulus debt working for you?


Stephan Martin
said

We need to start accounting the aging and now retiring Baby boomers. The current structural national deficit is $19 Billion annually. The current Government's mismanagement has eliminated the $Billions in annual budget surpluses put in place by the Liberals. Instead now we are back to Annual deficits and Baby Boomers retiring will only add to our debt unless the Government makes responsible changes to address the new shortfall in taxes being collected.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

CTV News

Budget 2010

Budget 2010

Full coverage of the March 4, 2010 Federal Budget.

Budget Interactive

Budget Interactive

Deficit and Debt: See the numbers behind Jim Flaherty's latest budget.

Peace Tower

Budget Highlights

Here are the major highlights, 'Leading the Way on Jobs and Growth.'

Budget Comix

Budget Comix

Incredible Shrinking Surplus: From balanced budgets to deficits.

Twitter

Follow on Twitter

Click here to follow CTV News budget and political coverage.

CTV News Video Player

Power Play with Tom Clark

Power Play with Tom Clark

Watch: A fresh look at politics, politicians and plays for power.

In Pictures

Finance Minister Jim Flaherty clambered into an igloo during a break in the G7 Finance Ministers meetings Iqaluit, Nunavut, Saturday February 6, 2010. (THE CANADIAN PRESS/Fred Chartrand)

Fun with Finance

Finance Minister Jim Flaherty makes the best of his photo ops. See the best from past year.

Today's Top Stories

Former Liberian President Charles Taylor waits for the start of his sentencing judgement in the courtroom of the Special Court for Sierra Leone in Leidschendam, near The Hague, Netherlands, Wednesday May 30, 2012.  (AP / Toussaint Kluiters)

Charles Taylor gets 50 years for 'brutal' crimes

More   1 Comments 1    1 Video(s) 1

A police officer removes a package containing a human foot from the Conservative Party headquarters in Ottawa on Tuesday, May 29, 2012. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Second package containing body part found in Ottawa

More  3 Video(s) 3

Supporters of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, hold placards and banners bearing images of him before the verdict was given in his extradition case at the Supreme Court in London, Wednesday, May 30, 2012. (AP / Matt Dunham)

Britain's top court backs extradition of WikiLeaks chief

More   1 Comments 1    2 Video(s) 2