Top Stories -   

Canadians want more money spent on medical research

Viewer

CTV News Video

Canada AM: Dr. Michael Julius, Research Canada
The chair of Research Canada breaks down a new study which found that Canadians believe Canada can make major medical breakthroughs if more money is spend on medical research.

Font-size: Bigger  Smaller  Share Share Print Print Comments Comments(17)

Photos

Slideshow image

View Larger Image

CTV.ca News Staff

Date: Mon. Jan. 18 2010 9:35 AM ET

Canadians have so much faith in our medical researchers, we'd even pay more taxes to help them continue their life-saving work, a new survey has found.

The survey for six health organizations that include universities and pharmaceutical companies found that most Canadians believe breakthroughs for cancer, diabetes, heart disease and Alzheimer's are attainable within 10 to 20 years.

In order to achieve those goals -- even in this weak economy -- an overwhelming majority of respondents said governments should increase funding for health and medical research.

The survey, called "Canada Speaks! 2010: Canadians Go for Gold in Health and Medical Research" was conducted by Angus Reid for six organizations:

  • Association of Faculties of Medicine of Canada (AFMC)
  • BIOTECanada
  • Canada's Research-Based Pharmaceutical Companies (Rx&D)
  • Canadian Healthcare Association (CHA)
  • MEDEC - Canada's Medical Technology Companies
  • Research Canada: An Alliance for Health Discovery

Almost nine out of 10 Canadians believe Canada should be a global leader in health and medical research, the survey found, but the majority also recognized that Canada is currently a middle-of-the-pack player in the research field among industrialized nations.

Nine out of 10 Canadians think it is important for both federal and provincial governments to invest in the education and training of health and medical researchers, the survey also found.

Dr. Michael Julius, the chair of Research Canada and vice-president of research at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre in Toronto says he thinks it's "stunning" that even in a recession, Canadians see health and medical research as a top priority.

"Their faith is merited," Julius told Canada AM Monday.

"We simply have to look at the track record that health researchers across the land have achieved over the last decade or so. We have achieved material advances so that whereas people once essentially received a death sentence, that's no longer the case. It's for one simple reason: research works."

But the survey also found that Canadians are greatly confused about how much money is currently spent on medical research.

Before being told the real figures, the survey respondents believed that an average of 23.2 cents out of every dollar spent by governments on health care went to medical research.

In fact, currently, less than one cent out of each dollar goes to research.

Once the survey respondents were told the actual figures, they said they believed that an average of 20.7 cents of each health care dollar should go toward health and medical research.

Julius says he finds it inspiring to hear Canadians think that researchers deserve so much funding.

"Asking Canadians who don't understand, frankly, how much money it costs to do medical research, it's a wonderful dream to hear them indicating we should be spending around 20 to 25 per cent of every health care dollar on medical research," he said.

"In fact, our own aspirations are a little more modest. We're hoping for one per cent of total health care funding dedicated to medical research."

The survey found that seven out of 10 Canadians would be willing to pay out of pocket to improve health and research capacity. Most said they would be willing to spend $1 more per week to fund new health and medical research projects in Canada.

As well, four out of five Canadians agree the federal government should support tax and regulatory policies that encourage private industries to conduct more medical research.

Again, Julius finds it surprising yet heartening that Canadians support medical researchers so strongly.

"They appreciate the health care system that they enjoy as Canadians. And they joined the dots; they understand that medical research is finding its way into the clinic and its providing new methods for prevention, for early detection and new modalities for intervention," he said.

The research was conducted by Angus Reid Public Opinion between Dec. 7 and 10, 2009 and involved a random survey of 1,000 adult Canadians. The survey has a margin of error of +/- 3.1 percentage points, 19 times out of 20.

Please Add Comments( )

Rob Carter, Jr.
said

I don't believe this at all, there's barely anyone I know that trusts doctors anymore or that trust the research results as unbiased and of ethical treatment!


Dan from Northern Ont
said

You can pay more for more research... it's called charity.


B. Kelley, Ontario
said

I would have no problem with more tax dollars going to medical research that could benefit the entire world. My concern, however, is that the current system in which pharmaceutical companies, who do their own research and fund studies through universities, have very little incentive to produce actual cures for disease. After all, a cure can only be sold once to a patient while ongoing treatment of symptoms can last a lifetime and generate much higher cash flow. Money has no conscience and the bottom line absolutely rules all corporations. Only programs aimed specifically at developing cures should be eligible for public funding.


Inkmont
said

They never ask me. The survey was conducted in part on behalf of private enterprise in the medical field such as pharmaceutical companies. First they complain that they have to charge high prices because of the cost of research and then they want taxpayers to pay for it?


John Galt
said

If Canadians want more medical research, they can individually donate more money of their own free will.Just because a group of people think it's a good idea doesn't mean that they have the right to enslave others to their values.By all means, medical research is great! There are tons of charities that you can donate to. Go right ahead! But the moment you tell me that I must also spend my money on it and I will go to jail if I don't, you're a thief.It doesn't matter if it's the government doing the job for you, or you holding a gun to my head, theft is still theft. My money is my own. It doesn't belong to the government or the social good, and then you allow me to keep some of it. It is mine, and I choose to spend it where I wish.

Jim McB
said

To my mind medical research is worthy of charitable donations. My problem is that the results of the research are marketed at the highest cost possible because of the testing and other administrative requirements imposed on society. I also need to learn more about the connection between drug companies, patents and research before being comfortable with this topic.I can say categorically that I support tax deductions for this type of work while I oppose it for things like PETA, Greenpeace and the Sierra Club to name a few. The medical side is trying to support a better life the other promoting their socialist ideas based on skewed science while we pay the freight.


Arven Duguay
said

Why Does CTV not telicast some of the responses to these surveys on the news.That would Be called equal time.


Jake
said

1000 adults is hardly a representative survey. Furthermore, this is actually kind of insulting. If medical researchers want more money, then they should get more results and not try to manipulate the public with overblown studies.


R Webb, Port Dover, Ontario
said

I don't believe this article at all. We are already paying too much tax. The thing is, we are spending badly.


Kathleen
said

Having big pharma industry do the research is what has gotten us to this point in the first place. Big pharma needs to have a long term foothold in a treatment to pay their shareholders - they don't want a solution they want the bandaid; society needs the solution. These 2 business models do not jive in any world. Government needs to get back into paying for research to cure and eliminate causes; big business wants bandaid solutions they can milk the public for, forever. There appear to be solutions and cures for a number of illnesses but its being ignored because a) it comes from natural sources so big pharma can't patent it and milk it; b) because its too easy and big pharma can't make any money off of it; c) it would mean the public needs to change the way they live (the new practice might inconvenience them), etc. Its all about money and big pharma wants to make as much as possible. The public needs solutions but will they do what is needed to arive at the solution, i.e. get plastics out of our food industry. There are many things that we do today for convenience that are bad for our environment and our health but is the public willing to do what is necessary or do they want a quick fix pill?


Narin, Montreal.
said

They have always been wanting more money and more money, while they never ever look whether they could find an efficient way to reduce cost and to be more productive. To be proficient is not about to put every nurse and doctor to work 60 hours a week but rather to find a good way of working and a good way to use the equipments. Should have a comity to study how to improve for example using the Toyota Way that prioritize nurses and doctors suggestions for how to improve.


Informed Person
said

I hope people here realize that research does not mean it just directly funds pharmaceutical companies. There are scientists all over Canada that have never recieved a penny from a pharmaceutical company. The costs to conduct research is very expensive. The materials required for research are highly specialized and are made by very few companies. Microscopes, micropipetes (can cost $10000), balances ect are very expensive. Not all doctors are researchers either.


Doug @ BC
said

You have to just love headlines like this.Every time I read "Canadians want" in a story,or hear some politician spouting the same line,I get suspicous.In part,because I'v RARELY been asked,and the statement only rarely fits into my own list of high priotitites. First,I'd like to see the list of questions,.People who do these surveys almost ALWAYS have an agenda of their own,and are seeking more money for their particular endeavour.That is not to suh=ggest they don't do ggod work.Only that they may be under the mis-guided impression that they are doing the ONLY work that counts.I know polsters encourage people to complete the poll.Once,half way through a poll I began to realize I wasn't informed enough to offer a valid opinon,and opted out.But the polster almost beat me over the head insisting my opinion was as valuable as anyone else's.It was not,I assure you. The fact is,the list of things "Canadians" want is not only diverse,it is endless.People who advocate for more,more more,and free,free and ever cheaper already know taxpayers are maxed out.Our current debt means we will alomost certainly mean higher taxes,or fewer services in the future.Therefore,every survey requesting more taxpayer dollars should conclude by asking the following question: "whose taxes will you raise,or which services will you cut in order to finance this new spending"????? Get ready folks.This is "lobbying" at it's highest level.If they don't get their money,the next step is a team of lawyers trying to make ther request for more funding a "Charter Right",as per our much despised "Charter of Rights and Freedom".The only people not covered there,are taxpayers and law abiding citizens.


Catherine
said

I would be all for paying more tax if I knew that it was directly going to medical research!My only concern is how to get the pharmeceutical companies out of this - we all know that they don't care about cures!


Mike J.
said

So big Pharma wants my tax money to go towards studying ways in finding cures for what ails us ...what a sham ... they could eradicate most of the diseases in this world if they wanted too..look at polio for example, the only reason that it was eradicated was because the man who discovered this vaccine his wife caught polio ...most tax and charity money goes towards paying for trademark rights for their laboratory creations ...alternative medicine is the way .....you guys probably won't print this because big Pharma probably spends alot of advertising dollars with u ...


PBW
said

I believe that research in all areas has been vastly underfunded by government for years, and not just in the field of medicine. We need governments to understand that, as long as research scientists at universities are funded by private business, the results will belong to that business, and be moved forward - or withheld - by that business. As noted in several posts, it is in the interest of big pharma to supply ongoing treatments for diseases, not cures. Were cures found when research was funded by government, then the government would be - I hope - responsible for applying the cure. Similarly, in industry: who knows how many patents have been bought up by "interested parties", not to make use of the invention, but to prevent loss to their own industry. There are all sorts of urban legends about fuel efficient engines, for example. In all, I believe a ten-fold MINIMUM increase of government research funding is needed in all sectors, not just in the health field. Let's invest our tax dollars in our nation's researchers, and through that investment have a say in how any breakthoughs are used.


Linda in Vancouver
said

I want a poll to tell us how many Canadians actually believe in these polls.When you look at the people for whom this poll was conducted,it's no wonder how they came to those conclusions. Of course there is almost as much money in polling as there is in the health care industry,so don't expect lobbyists,who conduct most of the polls,to advocate for transparency any time soon. For me,this story doesn't even pass a minor smell test.But,it will almost certainy be used by those who commissioned the poll,as a tool with which to pry more money out of the hands of our government coffers.(aka tax dollars) Doug in BC asks a valid question.What are you willing to give up in order to make this spending happen??


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

User Tools

About the tools

Need to get in touch with CTV? You can email the CTV web team using the 'Feedback' button.

Share it with your network of friends

Share this CTV article or feature with your friends. Click on the icon for your favourite social networking or messaging system, and follow the prompts.

Facebook

Share this article with Facebook

DIGG

Share this article with Digg

Newsvine

Share this article with Newsvine

Delicious

Share this article with delicious

Email

Share this article.
Send Email

Twitter

Share this article with Twitter

StumbleUpon

Share this article with StumbleUpon

Reddit

Share this article with Reddit

Yahoo! Buzz

Share this article with Yahoo! Buzz

Most Talked about Stories

I love that Chretien advised Blair with regard to foot-in-mouth disease. (Linguistically-challenged Chretien suffered from the political version himself, on an international scale.) I'm sure it comes as a bitter disappointment for Liberal supporters that Blair has nothing notably positive to say about financial "wizard" Paul Martin. (I didn't expect him to pay homage to the prevailing propagated myth, but, I thought perhaps he'd at least acknowledge Martin's excellence in creative accountancy and fiscal magic.) Oh, well. It was nice that a former British PM tipped his hat to one of our Liberal commanders, once actually voted "Canada's Most Embarrassing Person." Gives me a prideful tingle.

Prof. Pye Chartt

Blair memoir draws parallel to Chretien-Martin feud