News Sections
Government pushed to release Afghan torture reports
CTV News Video
|
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Thu. Dec. 10 2009 10:53 PM ET
A brewing political controversy could turn into a parliamentary one after the Liberals introduced a motion Thursday to force the government into releasing secret documents in the Afghan detainee affair.
Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff said the government has censored documents with "Soviet zeal," and should immediately release any records relating to an incident of torture which was documented by Canadian troops.
The motion passed in Parliament by a vote of 145-143, forcing the Tories to release the documents. However, if the Tories don't release the reports, Canada's courts might have to intervene on the case, which could centre on arguments of parliamentary privilege and national security.
The parliamentary maneuvering follows revelations by Gen. Walt Natynczyk, who said Canadian troops captured a man and handed him over to Afghan police, only to later see him being beaten.
The third Geneva Convention mandates that transferring prisoners who are then tortured is a war crime.
Though Natynczyk has called a military inquiry, MPs said that launching an internal investigation is not enough, because the military would be equal to both the accused and the jury.
"For over a year, the Conservatives had credible reports of torture from Canadian diplomats and soldiers in the field--and they did nothing," Ignatieff said.
"They must account for that year of willful blindness. Their refusal to get to the truth is costing us our credibility on human rights, and is a threat to the honour of Canada, which our troops so bravely uphold every day that they serve."
Earlier in the day, opposition MPs demanded the resignation of Defence Minister Peter MacKay and a public inquiry into the affair.
"It's time for this government to take the step that's required and that's to ask the minister to step down and start the inquiry, independently," said NDP Leader Jack Layton.
The demands in Ottawa came as the Conservative government continues to face heated questions over its insistence that the Canadian Forces never knowingly put Afghan detainees at the risk of torture.
Natynczyk revealed that in June 2006, Canadian troops captured a man and handed him over to Afghan police, only to find out that he was mistreated and beaten. The Canadians then took the man back into their custody.
Bloc Quebecois leader Gilles Duceppe pointed to a 2006 report by a Canadian commander in Afghanistan that stated photos were taken of detainees before handing them over to Afghan authorities. Duceppe said this was "in order to have evidence of mistreatment because, I quote 'it has happened in the past.'"
Duceppe alleged that the government knew about the abuse for "quite some time."
However, Prime Minister Steven Harper said the report was evidence that the Canadian government took action to prevent the abuse, and that the issue was dealt with up to four years ago. He accused the opposition MPs of attacking Canadian soldiers.
"Canadian forces, when faced with a case of abuse, took immediate action to deal with that ... that should hardly be used as a reason to attack the forces, it should be used as a reason to praise them."
The day before the revelation, Natynczyk said that Canadian troops had only questioned the photographed man, not captured him. But after reviewing the file with his staff, the general called a news conference to release the correct information.
Natynczyk also said the military inquiry would determine why neither he, or his predecessor Rick Hillier, saw a platoon commander's report which detailed the prisoner's capture.
Liberal defence critic Ujjal Dosanjh said the government cannot claim that Natynczyk's announcement yesterday was the first time it learned about this specific incident of detainee abuse.
Further questions
Ottawa law professor Errol Menders said the incident report forms "incontrovertible proof" that Canada should have immediately ceased transfers to Afghan authorities, a decision which the government is ultimately responsible for.
"If these guys had no clear instructions, and it's clear they didn't, they were almost making it up on the fly which shows you the civilian command was putting them into an untenable position," Mendes said.
The revelation by Natynczyk led opposition members to attack the Conservative government and MacKay, who has said "there is not a single, proven allegation" of abuse prior to 2007.
When MacKay appeared before the special House of Commons committee on Wednesday, he said it was "an outrageous, false, inflammatory and insulting allegation" from a fellow MP.
He also said that "no one ever turned a blind eye. Let me be clear, the government of Canada has never been complicit in torture or any violation of international law by willfully allowing prisoners taken by the Canadian forces to be exposed to abuse."
Richard Colvin, the diplomat who testified last month that the Conservative government was indifferent to his warnings of torture, is preparing a letter for the House of Commons committee to respond to statements made by the government in recent weeks.
The Conservative government initially responded to Colvin's allegations by trying to discredit him, a tactic that prompted a backlash from other diplomats and from opposition members. MacKay first said there were "incredible holes" in Colvin's allegations, though the defence minister has recently said his attacks on the ex-diplomat's allegations were not personal.
With files from The Canadian Press
User Tools
Related Stories
CTV News
Canada in Afghanistan
The latest news, photos and interactives from Canada's mission in Afghanistan.
Soldiers Overcome Injuries
Wounded soldiers use sports to overcome injuries, adjust to their new reality.
Interactive
Lessons Learned
A number of the medical innovations that we now take for granted were conceived and tested during wartime.
Bios and Pictures
Canadian Casualties
We remember those who lost their lives in Afghanistan since the mission began in 2002.
In Pictures
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
But they probably get straight As for computer games and TV.
Email









Comments are now closed for this story
John Kirn
0
said
0
Andrew in Alberta
0
said
0
John E
0
said
0
Time for Liberal accountability
0
said
0
p d w
0
said
0
Danny Dinosaur
0
said
0
WallyJ
0
said
0
D J In Manitobaan
0
said
0
gregoryd
0
said
0
John Global
0
said
0
annie
0
said
0
rosey
0
said
0
Jim from Ottawa
0
said
0
Ray Yates
0
said
0
keith
0
said
0
Wilma Dickfit
0
said
0
Russ
0
said
0
SK Doc
0
said
0
kenl77
0
said
0
Rat-tat-tat
0
said
0
Maybe they were tortured? Maybe they were not?
Don't know,don't want to know, don't care what the government says about. I JUST DO NOT CARE ABOUT THE TALIBAN.
I had a real dislike for them since 9 .
Fog of Life
0
said
0
PB_Toronto
0
said
0
dgc911
0
said
0
nathan
0
said
0
The bottom line is, shoot them in the head, blow them up, what have you, once they are in your custody you MUST follow the Geneva conventions or your no better then them.
Wayne Owen Sound
0
said
0
Not a drone
0
said
0
Raymond
0
said
0
The Other Lowell in BC
0
said
0
charlie
0
said
0
straus
0
said
0
Dan
0
said
0
Westcoast Rick
0
said
0
If somebody recommends another inquiry I am going to throw up.
Stephen
0
said
0
jim
0
said
0
However we really ought to care about whether
or not MacKay, Hillier, Harper and others have been telling lies to to Canadians.
willowway1
0
said
0
Mika
0
said
0
Clayton King
0
said
0
Dave Zroback
0
said
0
Arturolexo
0
said
0
JimK
0
said
0
J
0
said
0
Vancouver Folks
0
said
0
Mike
0
said
0
Ed
0
said
0
Kim Hoar
0
said
0
Remittance
0
said
0
Nick
0
said
0
We're crucifying our own Canadian Forces by having this talked about any more than it should be... The Canadian Military has a job...and part of that job includes ridding Afghanistan ( KILLING) of the Taliban regime. There are more pressing issues to worry about yet the politicians and media are for a way to discredit each other anyway they can. The best the opposition can come up with is this? Over how prisoners are treated? Who cares. Afghanistan isn't a daycare, it's a war zone. Get over it.
Ryan
0
said
0
Doug
0
said
0
Paul B
0
said
0
Jared Benson
0
said
0
JustanAirman
0
said
0
Dale Woloshin
0
said
0
Dennis Willows
0
said
0
Bill Cowen
0
said
0
Paul in the West
0
said
0
Tom
0
said
0
Chad
0
said
0
Ryan P.
0
said
0
Glenn in Winnipeg
0
said
0
laurie
0
said
0
anthony
0
said
0
NS
0
said
0
PDW
0
said
0
Inkmont
0
said
0
charlie
0
said
0
bill from winnipeg
0
said
0
Brodie Houlette
0
said
0
Jim
0
said
0
Jim, NS
0
said
0
Dan from Northern Ont
0
said
0
Craig in Burnaby BC
0
said
0
Gill
0
said
0
mike campbell
0
said
0
james from winnipeg
0
said
0
A Concerned Canadian
0
said
0
Richard in Ontario
0
said
0
charlie
0
said
0
Gord. Robson, Nova Scotia
0
said
0
Jeremy
0
said
0
Helen Madill
0
said
0
Ian Ottawa
0
said
0
Dale, Alberta
0
said
0
Martin for Canada
0
said
0
Brent
0
said
0
These guys are evil and have no conscious so you're not going to appeal to their sensitive side by being nice to them and affording them the mercy that they didn't provide to their countless victims.
Ben
0
said
0
MARG MM
0
said
0
Silent Majority
0
said
0
Peter Rapsey
0
said
0
Paul D.
0
said
0
Maggie
0
said
0
reece
0
said
0
Allan Eizinas
0
said
0
Doug @ BC
0
said
0
The Old Lady
0
said
0
Pat
0
said
0
Dean in YYZ
0
said
0
LS
0
said
0
Griffon1
0
said
0
Why are we not celebrating the fact that after seven years in Afghanistan and recent investigation and exposure, we can find no instances of our troops 'abusing' prisoners and only find one instance in which a detainee our troops handled may subsequently have received some 'abuse' (whatever the definition of that might be in Afghanistan let alone Canada) and was promptly rescued from the situation by the same Canadian troops. This record of restraint and decency in a war environment has probably not been equalled, by anyone, ever. Bloody marvelous I say!
Tom Morbitte
0
said
0
Larry NL
0
said
0
MAC
0
said
0
m shmigelsky
0
said
0
KB In Southern Ontario
0
said
0
my take on this
0
said
0
mike campbell
0
said
0
Jim
0
said
0
Kris PIttman
0
said
0
john from Saskatoon
0
said
0
Anne M
0
said
0
Mark
0
said
0
The TRUTH please!
0
said
0
Mary
0
said
0
Ivan
0
said
0
Jamie D
0
said
0
rotunda50
0
said
0
That torture was 'highly probable' at the hands of the Afghan authorities is increasingly indisputable, given the information released over the past few weeks and especially in the past few days.
By all accounts, credible countries, creditable organizations and our own credible diplomat (Colvin, subsequently promoted by this same government), all of whom were involved 'on the ground' in Afghanistan, were all reporting this 'common knowledge' in unambiguous language.
It defies logic to accept that our Government was blissfully unaware of this 'common knowledge' and, as such, they have never claimed that.
What they have claimed, via weasel words currently being exploited by MacKay, is there has been 'no credible evidence' and 'no absolute proof' of torture.
According to a poll released today the majority of Canadians believe this 'credible evidence' has always been on display :- Colvin, the Red Cross etc. Its just that its been dismissed as hearsay by our Government today, and presumably in 2006/7.
As for 'absolute proof' .... we don't even hold our supreme court to that standard! Now or in 2006/7.
Our Government has to stop trying to hide whatever it is they are tying to hide. If they didn't do anything wrong then turn over uncensored documents to the 'political' inquiry and if this is not possible under current laws ..... draft retroactive laws and secrecy covenants to allow it.
Unfortunately, maturity and kindergarten don't mix, even worse, this lunacy, by highly paid officials, costs you and I, each and every hour of each and every day.
Jamie D
0
said
0
Proud Canadian
0
said
0
Portes
0
said
0
Bob Fenton
0
said
0
BC Lady
0
said
0
Prof. Pye Chartt
0
said
0
charlie
0
said
0
Con Servative
0
said
0
Martin
0
said
0
Dave S
0
said
0
In times of war the military is doing exactly what they should do and that is turn their people over to their Government to deal with, our Military is not a bunch of babysitters. And besides that your geneva logic is just as outdated as the agreement itself
bill from winnipeg
0
said
0
Doug On
0
said
0
gerald
0
said
0
That sort of headline could be damaging to our international image, never mind the 2010 Winter Olympics.
Frank Buchan
0
said
0
Keith Olson
0
said
0
gp
0
said
0
Rick Ottawa
0
said
0
3 Roto's and counting
0
said
0
Josh in Mossejaw, Sask
0
said
0
Albertaboy111
0
said
0
Adel Hay
0
said
0
jim C
0
said
0
Edmonton Vic
0
said
0
canadian
0
said
0
charlie
0
said
0
Prof. Pye Chartt
0
said
0
Rick in NB, Ste Marie
0
said
0
Ian in Mississauga
0
said
0
TS
0
said
0
Rob2010
0
said
0
Adam in Ottawa
0
said
0
lavern
0
said
0
Greg in Cambridge
0
said
0
charlie
0
said
0
Shawn
0
said
0
Julie
0
said
0
Let ME be clear
0
said
0
simon
0
said
0
Pat
0
said
0
Chris in Ontariariari-Oh!
0
said
0
SpinMeNot
0
said
0
montrealer
0
said
0
retired military
0
said
0
KS in Barrie
0
said
0
Shaoqi
0
said
0
Martin
0
said
0
David in Dartmouth
0
said
0
emily galbraith
0
said
0
trunorth
0
said
0
Some Dude
0
said
0
Al
0
said
0
Catwoman 37
0
said
0
TS
0
said
0
Shirley - SK
0
said
0
Metro
0
said
0
Lorne
0
said
0
Peter 1951
0
said
0
scott
0
said
0
Rene
0
said
0
Slewhigh Yendick
0
said
0
Mac
0
said
0
Martin in ON
0
said
0
Martin in NB
0
said
0
DownEast
0
said
0
sph
0
said
0