Top Stories -   

1

Harper cabinet unleashes flood of patronage

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (22) Facebook   

Date: Sunday Aug. 30, 2009 3:16 PM ET

OTTAWA — Weeks before Stephen Harper named some of his closest Tory friends to the Senate, his cabinet quietly approved a flood of appointments to federal boards that also rewarded party faithful.

At least 20 of the 111 appointments made Aug. 4 went to identifiable federal and provincial Conservative donors and supporters.

That includes a failed candidate in Vancouver, a top organizer with the Nova Scotia party, and a would-be Senate nominee from Alberta.

The postings come with per diems of up to $450 for part-time positions and salaries of up to $118,000 a year for full-time posts.

Some of the bodies involved were: the Immigration and Refugee Board, Canada Pension Plan review tribunals, employment insurance referee boards, the parole board, coastal pilotage authorities, port authorities and museum boards.

Nearly a third of the posts were first-time assignments and the remainder were renewals of three-year terms set to expire in late October or November.

The rush of appointments followed a little-noticed series of judicial appointments to superior courts across the country in July.

That round brought the total number of superior court judges appointed by the Harper government to 201 since 2006.

It also further fuelled opposition claims that the prime minister has abandoned election promises of transparency and merit-based public-service and judicial appointments.

Conservative appointments to courts, boards, quasi-judicial tribunals and Crown corporations now total an estimated 3,000 since Harper became prime minister.

The Tories are also closing in on the Liberals in the Senate after Harper's appointment of nine senators Thursday, including at least two close advisers.

Several of the earlier judicial posts went to lawyers with Tory connections.

Lawrence O'Neill is a former Progressive Conservative MP from Nova Scotia whose anti-abortion positions were the subject of controversy when he was named to the bench in 2007.

And Ronald Stevens was a member of the Alberta Conservative party, a sitting member of the legislature, and former attorney general, when he was appointed in May.

Harper has yet to establish his promised Public Appointments Commission to set standards and criteria for cabinet nominations to federal posts. That despite the fact that Treasury Board documents show a four-person secretariat set up to support the commission has cost taxpayers a total of $3.6 million since 2006.

Liberal MP Dan McTeague said Harper should be concerned that voters will be wary of him following his failure to deliver on his accountability and transparency promises from the past two elections.

He added that the public should not have to dredge through Google or newspaper clippings to determine if there are political connections behind the scores of appointments the government hands out.

"These were things that were part of his pledge to make Parliament more accountable and the process to be more transparent," McTeague said.

"He has done everything that he has criticized. I think the prime minister and his team should be well aware of the fact that there frankly isn't a single pledge they can make now or down the road that the Canadian public can take seriously."

A spokesman defended the prime minister's approach, noting Harper shelved the Public Appointments Commission after the opposition parties opposed his nomination to lead the new agency -- former Calgary energy executive Gwyn Morgan.

"The opposition decided to play partisan political games with that nomination and, as such, our government was unable to fill the position," said Dimitri Soudas.

New Democrat MP Joe Comartin called for the creation of a special committee of the House of Commons to review all federal appointments and establish a "code of laws" that would eventually be the standard for public service nominations.

He also called on Harper to expand the jurisdiction of advisory panels for judgeships and re-establish a system set up by the previous Liberal government that allowed the Commons justice committee to interview nominees to the Supreme Court.

Among Conservative supporters or those with Tory connections who received posts or had them renewed in the August round of appointments:

  • Lorne Mayencourt, who ran unsuccessfully in Vancouver in the last federal election, was named chair of the employment insurance boards of referees for B.C.
  • David Usherwood, who placed ninth as a Progressive Conservative candidate in the 2004 Alberta Senate nominee election, received a second three-year appointment as chair of the employment insurance referee boards in Alberta.
  • Geoffrey Machum, who chaired the Nova Scotia Progressive Conservative leadership convention in 2006, got a second three-year appointment to the Halifax Port Authority.
  • Brian Coburn, an Ontario Progressive Conservative MPP under former premier Mike Harris, received a second three-year appointment as a citizenship judge.

Comments are now closed for this story

just another canadian
said
0 0

It must be frustrating for the liberals to see their grip on everything slipping away. All the liberal senators being replaced with consevatives who actually want senate reform. Judges who want to hug a thug being replaced with judges who give out sentances. All those nice appointments the liberals always gave their friends now being replaced with conservatives. The liberals taught the consevatives well. Now, how do you liberals like it???


MHB
said
0 0

Harper is just a normal politician. He makes promises fully aware that he will break them once in power. Honest politicians are species that went extinct centuries ago!.


Canadian
said
0 0

Who cares? Politics are corrupt and there is nothing we can do about it. That's the way is always has been, and that's the way it will remain.

Rene
said
0 0

"A spokesman defended the prime minister's approach, noting Harper shelved the Public Appointments Commission after the opposition parties opposed his nomination to lead the new agency -- former Calgary energy executive Gwyn Morgan."

Give me a break. Do you really think the rest of Canada is that stupid? There are nearly 35 million people in Canada surely you could find one that everyone agrees on.

No this is just another example of a Canadian elevated to the post of Prime Minister who has no integrity, and no desire to change.

I for one am getting, no I am tired of these political games that are played in Ottawa, all in the name of power. It's high time that someone, anyone steps up to the plate who has personal integrity, and whose word is his/her bond, who will run for the elected position of Prime Minister.

Based on what I see so far, I would vote for "none of the above" if that were a valid selection in the next election. Unfortunately it isn't, and as a result Canada is the worse for it. IMO.

geo
said
0 0

Give me a break folks,these positions need to be filled.
Twenty out of 111 appointees are known Conservatives.That's not 111/111 it's 20.
What do you expect for the rest...put in Liberals? NDPers? or the BLOC?
This is not new, the Liberals were the worst of this kind of appointments,usually done hours after an election call.
I hope Harper gets a majority next election so he can get the Senate made into an elected one.
The present Senate members rejected electing because the Liberals were thinking of themselves and not the taxpayer.Now Harper's playing their game on their turf.Elected Senate is coming.
With a majority win watch for Harper to get rid of giving political parties $1.95 for each vote they get from taxpayer dollars.Stupidest giveaway ever conceived.
Time for a majority win for Harper to stop these elections happening every year.


ontario Taxpayer
said
0 0

The Liberals are up in arms because they obviously it is only their right as the natural ruling party to make such appointments.

As for those who will call Harper a hypocrite, these appointments were done in accordance with Canadian law and existing policies and the PMO has done nothing wrong. If the Liberals win the next election, I am confident they will "replace" all of these appointees with their own people. The only exception is that they will do it quietly and behind closed doors away from prying eyes, because that is the Liberal way.


Bryce Code
said
0 0

The Liberal press like to focus on the Conservative angle. However, what is missing from the story is how many identifiable Liberals and NDP were appointed. It would not surprise me if it exceeded the Tory number. A good example is Gary Doer as Ambassdor to the U.S.. The Liberals are the only ones incapable of appointing persons of another stripe. Harper has never had any difficulty doing this, so long as the person was qualified for the posting.


Cambob in Toronto
said
0 0

Harper is obviously evil. How else can you explain a man who would appoint people to positions in government simply because those people share similar beliefs and have shown it publicly!

Wait a minute... That what the voters did. They ELECTED Harper's Conservatives to lead government!

According to most Harper Haters, the guy should have appointed strangers who are opposed to his point of view. Ahhh, Canadian logic.


Cairn001
said
0 0

The rules are fairly simple: When Liberals are in power they nominate Liberals, with the media fawning over the quality of the appointments. When Tories are in power they are expected to nominate Liberal and NDP supporters, and the media chides them if they don't.


Mark M
said
0 0

With the polls the way they are,you'd think that ideally 30% of the appointments would be Conservative, just by playing the odds, yet only 18% of the appointed 111 are obvious conservatives! Seems to me that that percentage is BELOW what should be in there. Do people actually think EVERY person that is appointed somewhere should have no party preference? In an ideal world, appointments should be banned from any party, and all jobs should be advertised, but until then...


Ted in Toronto
said
0 0

So 90 of 111 was a trickle of non-conservatives? ... as opposed to a "flood" for 20 conservatives?

Who were the other 90? Greens?


Pat - Toronto
said
0 0

Hello! Harper is doing what the Liberals did for years and who can blame him? He is making it safe for Canadians in case the Liberals win again. I see nothing wrong with what he has done. When you are fighting against a cheating team, sometimes you have to work out a strategy that may appear as cheating but is really a protective move as the other side cannot be dealt with in a fair and honest manner.. I give him thumbs up for these moves.. YAY!


Ted in Toronto
said
0 0

Just trying to offset all the previous Liberal pork barrel career weasel appointments that plague the agencies we have now.


keith
said
0 0

It took me about 1 sentence to realize that this was a pseudo-hate article on the evil Harper government.

Methinks the author might be more inclined to the liberals perhaps?


Michaele Ontario
said
0 0

Prime Minister Harper has long term goals for Canada, and in spite of short sight newsreports he is doing the right thing for Canada. Conpicuously absent in this report with the dramatic headline is the truth about how many times since being in office the Prime Minister and the Conservative MP's have introduced legislation to change the Senate to an elected, limited term appointment, only to be stalled and defeated by non other than the Libs in Opposition.
How about the whole story from CTV instead of this faux outrage report?



voitek from Guelph
said
0 0

i really do not see what is new here. every party will try to put their people in high positions.

be it the senate, judges, or commitees it is the same logic.


Shad Catt
said
0 0

20 out of 111 is what, 18%? And 40% of the country supports the Conservative party? That's actually far, far lower than one would expect. What a hilarious non-story you've cooked up here! If anything Conservatives are under represented in these appointments.


Peter Kavanagh
said
0 0

20 out of 110 ? What were they supposed to do ? Avoid anybody with conections to the party just because the Harper Haters might cry ?

Keep up the great work Mr Prime Minister , you're the best we've had in years .


John in Ontario
said
0 0

When the Cretien Government first took over EVERY federal appointee in my riding was turfed and replaced with a Liberal. But, it's not all about patrongage. Sometimes it's putting the elected party's ideological stamp on the Boards. Anyone not wearing a red shirt think that some serious conservative thought is needed on parole boards for example?


jean from nb
said
0 0

20 out of 111. It certainly would be all 111 if it were the liberals.


Paul
said
0 0

Harper is hypocritical and deceitful. Power and right-wing autocratic values are his only motivations.

The Liberals were very imperfect but at least they had a vision for moving Canada forward in some important areas.

Time for a change!


Suzanne T. (Lower Mainland)
said
0 0

We like to delude ourselves that Canada is a democracy. It isn't though. We are a pseudo-democracy.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Top Stories

Investigators remove a package containing a human foot from the Conservative Party of Canada office in Ottawa, Tuesday, May 29, 2012.

Human foot was in package sent to Tory HQ: coroner

More  4 Video(s) 4

Syrian charge d'affaires Bashir Akbik speaks with CTV News outside of the Syrian embassy in Ottawa on Tuesday, May 29, 2012.

Syrian diplomat denounces expulsion from Canada

More   33 Comments 33    6 Video(s) 6