News Sections
Harper cabinet unleashes flood of patronage
The Canadian Press
Date: Sunday Aug. 30, 2009 3:16 PM ET
OTTAWA Weeks before Stephen Harper named some of his closest Tory friends to the Senate, his cabinet quietly approved a flood of appointments to federal boards that also rewarded party faithful.
At least 20 of the 111 appointments made Aug. 4 went to identifiable federal and provincial Conservative donors and supporters.
That includes a failed candidate in Vancouver, a top organizer with the Nova Scotia party, and a would-be Senate nominee from Alberta.
The postings come with per diems of up to $450 for part-time positions and salaries of up to $118,000 a year for full-time posts.
Some of the bodies involved were: the Immigration and Refugee Board, Canada Pension Plan review tribunals, employment insurance referee boards, the parole board, coastal pilotage authorities, port authorities and museum boards.
Nearly a third of the posts were first-time assignments and the remainder were renewals of three-year terms set to expire in late October or November.
The rush of appointments followed a little-noticed series of judicial appointments to superior courts across the country in July.
That round brought the total number of superior court judges appointed by the Harper government to 201 since 2006.
It also further fuelled opposition claims that the prime minister has abandoned election promises of transparency and merit-based public-service and judicial appointments.
Conservative appointments to courts, boards, quasi-judicial tribunals and Crown corporations now total an estimated 3,000 since Harper became prime minister.
The Tories are also closing in on the Liberals in the Senate after Harper's appointment of nine senators Thursday, including at least two close advisers.
Several of the earlier judicial posts went to lawyers with Tory connections.
Lawrence O'Neill is a former Progressive Conservative MP from Nova Scotia whose anti-abortion positions were the subject of controversy when he was named to the bench in 2007.
And Ronald Stevens was a member of the Alberta Conservative party, a sitting member of the legislature, and former attorney general, when he was appointed in May.
Harper has yet to establish his promised Public Appointments Commission to set standards and criteria for cabinet nominations to federal posts. That despite the fact that Treasury Board documents show a four-person secretariat set up to support the commission has cost taxpayers a total of $3.6 million since 2006.
Liberal MP Dan McTeague said Harper should be concerned that voters will be wary of him following his failure to deliver on his accountability and transparency promises from the past two elections.
He added that the public should not have to dredge through Google or newspaper clippings to determine if there are political connections behind the scores of appointments the government hands out.
"These were things that were part of his pledge to make Parliament more accountable and the process to be more transparent," McTeague said.
"He has done everything that he has criticized. I think the prime minister and his team should be well aware of the fact that there frankly isn't a single pledge they can make now or down the road that the Canadian public can take seriously."
A spokesman defended the prime minister's approach, noting Harper shelved the Public Appointments Commission after the opposition parties opposed his nomination to lead the new agency -- former Calgary energy executive Gwyn Morgan.
"The opposition decided to play partisan political games with that nomination and, as such, our government was unable to fill the position," said Dimitri Soudas.
New Democrat MP Joe Comartin called for the creation of a special committee of the House of Commons to review all federal appointments and establish a "code of laws" that would eventually be the standard for public service nominations.
He also called on Harper to expand the jurisdiction of advisory panels for judgeships and re-establish a system set up by the previous Liberal government that allowed the Commons justice committee to interview nominees to the Supreme Court.
Among Conservative supporters or those with Tory connections who received posts or had them renewed in the August round of appointments:
- Lorne Mayencourt, who ran unsuccessfully in Vancouver in the last federal election, was named chair of the employment insurance boards of referees for B.C.
- David Usherwood, who placed ninth as a Progressive Conservative candidate in the 2004 Alberta Senate nominee election, received a second three-year appointment as chair of the employment insurance referee boards in Alberta.
- Geoffrey Machum, who chaired the Nova Scotia Progressive Conservative leadership convention in 2006, got a second three-year appointment to the Halifax Port Authority.
- Brian Coburn, an Ontario Progressive Conservative MPP under former premier Mike Harris, received a second three-year appointment as a citizenship judge.
User Tools
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
But they probably get straight As for computer games and TV.
Email
Comments are now closed for this story
just another canadian
0
said
0
MHB
0
said
0
Canadian
0
said
0
Rene
0
said
0
Give me a break. Do you really think the rest of Canada is that stupid? There are nearly 35 million people in Canada surely you could find one that everyone agrees on.
No this is just another example of a Canadian elevated to the post of Prime Minister who has no integrity, and no desire to change.
I for one am getting, no I am tired of these political games that are played in Ottawa, all in the name of power. It's high time that someone, anyone steps up to the plate who has personal integrity, and whose word is his/her bond, who will run for the elected position of Prime Minister.
Based on what I see so far, I would vote for "none of the above" if that were a valid selection in the next election. Unfortunately it isn't, and as a result Canada is the worse for it. IMO.
geo
0
said
0
Twenty out of 111 appointees are known Conservatives.That's not 111/111 it's 20.
What do you expect for the rest...put in Liberals? NDPers? or the BLOC?
This is not new, the Liberals were the worst of this kind of appointments,usually done hours after an election call.
I hope Harper gets a majority next election so he can get the Senate made into an elected one.
The present Senate members rejected electing because the Liberals were thinking of themselves and not the taxpayer.Now Harper's playing their game on their turf.Elected Senate is coming.
With a majority win watch for Harper to get rid of giving political parties $1.95 for each vote they get from taxpayer dollars.Stupidest giveaway ever conceived.
Time for a majority win for Harper to stop these elections happening every year.
ontario Taxpayer
0
said
0
As for those who will call Harper a hypocrite, these appointments were done in accordance with Canadian law and existing policies and the PMO has done nothing wrong. If the Liberals win the next election, I am confident they will "replace" all of these appointees with their own people. The only exception is that they will do it quietly and behind closed doors away from prying eyes, because that is the Liberal way.
Bryce Code
0
said
0
Cambob in Toronto
0
said
0
Wait a minute... That what the voters did. They ELECTED Harper's Conservatives to lead government!
According to most Harper Haters, the guy should have appointed strangers who are opposed to his point of view. Ahhh, Canadian logic.
Cairn001
0
said
0
Mark M
0
said
0
Ted in Toronto
0
said
0
Who were the other 90? Greens?
Pat - Toronto
0
said
0
Ted in Toronto
0
said
0
keith
0
said
0
Methinks the author might be more inclined to the liberals perhaps?
Michaele Ontario
0
said
0
How about the whole story from CTV instead of this faux outrage report?
voitek from Guelph
0
said
0
be it the senate, judges, or commitees it is the same logic.
Shad Catt
0
said
0
Peter Kavanagh
0
said
0
Keep up the great work Mr Prime Minister , you're the best we've had in years .
John in Ontario
0
said
0
jean from nb
0
said
0
Paul
0
said
0
The Liberals were very imperfect but at least they had a vision for moving Canada forward in some important areas.
Time for a change!
Suzanne T. (Lower Mainland)
0
said
0