News Sections
One in 10 receives wrong meds in hospital
CTV News Video
|
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
A A |
Email
|
Print
| Comments (11)
| Add Comments
Tweet
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Tue. Aug. 14 2007 9:18 PM ET
A new analysis about the chances of being injured or harmed during treatment in Canadian hospitals finds that some errors occur with disturbing frequency.
According to the report by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI), the chances of patients receiving the wrong medication or wrong dose was about 1 in 10 in 2005.
The chances of an adult contracting an infection while in an acute care hospital are about the same: 1 in 10, while the chances of a child contracting an infection while in hospital are about 1 in 12.
Incidents in which a foreign object is left behind in a surgical cavity are less common, affecting about 1 in 3,000 patients in Canadian hospitals (outside of Quebec and parts of Manitoba). Yet that still adds up to more than 200 incidents per year between 2003-2004 and 2005-2006.
Previous studies show that obese patients are at higher risk of having a foreign object left behind after surgery, though the reasons aren't clear.
Other higher risk groups include: patients who undergo emergency operations, those who have an unexpected change in operation or those who have a change in nursing or surgical staff during a procedure.
"The consequences of leaving a sponge or other foreign object in after surgery can be significant, but experts suggest that targeted strategies can reduce the risk," says Dr. Indra Pulcins, CIHI's director of Health Reports and Analysis.
Those strategies include following a practice of sponge and instrument counts, as well as vigilant inspection of body cavities when the surgery is complete.
One of 21 mothers giving birth by vaginal delivery in hospital experience obstetrical traumas, such as lacerations of the cervix, vaginal wall, or injury to the bladder or urethra. Between April 2003 and March 2006, there were more than 9,100 reported obstetric traumas in Canadian hospitals, outside of Quebec each year.
One in 141 babies born in hospitals outside of Quebec experienced birth trauma, such as injuries to the scalp, skull fractures, or injuries to nervous systems. This represents more than 1,700 cases yearly.
Previous research suggests that risk factors for trauma during birth include newborns weighing more than 4 kg, long labour, the need to use instruments during delivery and a woman's position during birth.
CIHI's analysis found that 3.6 out of every 1,000 patients in Canadian hospitals (outside Quebec and parts of Manitoba) experience a pulmonary embolism while in hospital. An embolism occurs when a blood clot or globule of tissue travels through the veins and into the lung, and can occur when patients are bed-ridden or sedentary for long periods.
Dr. Jennifer Zelmer, CIHI's vice-president of Research and Analysis says tracking medical errors and adverse incidents is important in learning how to prevent them.
"While we do not know how to prevent all adverse events, tracking how often they occur and understanding the factors that contribute to them is an important step in improving patient safety," says Zelmer.
Experts have suggested a number of strategies to reduce the risk or errors and patient harm, including automated drug alerts and medication reconciliation -- the process designed to prevent medication errors at patient transition points.
User Tools
Related Stories
Related Websites
Most Popular
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
This is just wrong but if I were to send something to the politicians I would have sent the brain!
Add New Comment ( )
Lynne
0
said
0
p gaudet
0
said
0
Christopher Pryde
0
said
0
The system is broken at its foundation. We need to rebuild it beginning with the training of our current medical students.
Andrew H
0
said
0
Maybe they are overworked and under-paid??
For example, when you go see your family doctor they get paid about $30 for the visit. This is regardless of the number of problems you are being seen for. Roughly $10 of that $30 goes to overhead expenses (paying staff, renting office space, supplies etc) roughly another $10 goes to taxes paid to the government (even though most family doctors have no pension plan, and no health insurance plan, and no vacation pay).
So for about $10 your family doctor does their best to provide you with the best care possible.
Every Canadian doctor would love an electronic office. However, an electronic medical system can cost thousands per month to run and is usually only feasible for large groups, hospital clinics, or when grants are given to fund them.
On a positive note, Ontario recently started a program where you can have all of your medications reviewed by your pharmacist. This is paid for by the province. This is in an attempt to reduce medication errors and interactions.
There is also a huge shortage of nurses in Canada. Many nurses are pushed into taking extra shifts and working overtime to fill in the gaps. They are way overworked and underpaid.
If you are concerned about the quality of the medical care you receive then you should take the time to write your provincial and federal MPs and your provincial and federal ministers of health and demand that your taxes are used more responsibly by adequately funding the Canadian health-care system.
Health-care workers aren't malicious or uncaring or inattentive people. They have devoted their lives to helping others and sadly lack the support they need from the government and lack the respect and understanding they need from their patients.
David Wildeboer
0
said
0
As for electronic records, I'm a family doc in Alberta where at least 60% of physicians have an EMR. However, these systems are not user friendly as most are designed by people with little experience in the health field. Or, in the case of the system we have, was initially designed by physicians but then taken over by programmers making it less user friendly and less functional. All these systems require lots of extra programming to be province and region specific so there are more places to break down.
As for the hospitals, there are no systems that I know of with a Canadian specific EMR. Most of the products are American and as such are designed to prevent lawsuits by multiple, multiple layers of redundancy and checks and are therefore clunky and unusable. If someone out there wants to start from scratch and design and program something that works for Canada, you'll have lots of happy and grateful health professionals.
John B
0
said
0
Thank god airline pilots aren't forgiven as easy!
Karen
0
said
0
Ian Whitecross
0
said
0
Randy S
0
said
0
Brian S
0
said
0
Here in Canada, her doctors repeatedly have had to scramble to look for information because it had not yet been transcribed onto the out-of-date files at the hospital.
When will Canada catch up to the rest of the advanced world?
Vince M
0
said
0