Sci-Tech -   

1

Protests planned to oppose Canadian copyright law

Internet activists protest against the international copyright agreement ACTA , the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, in front of the European Parliament office in Warsaw, Poland, Tuesday, Jan. 24, 2012. (AP Photo/Alik Keplicz) Marc Saltzman gives Canada AM his picks for top gadget gifts under $50, Monday, Nov. 28, 2011.
Internet activists protest against the international copyright agreement ACTA , the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, in front of the European Parliament office in Warsaw, Poland, Tuesday, Jan. 24, 2012. (AP Photo/Alik Keplicz)

View Larger Image

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (34) Facebook   

Date: Friday Feb. 10, 2012 8:41 PM ET

Canadians are protesting proposed copyright laws online and offline Friday they say infringe on basic free-speech rights, threaten to "lock-down" the Internet and play into the hands of the entertainment industry.

The Copyright Modernization Act (Bill C-11) is vehemently opposed by thousands of people who argue the government hasn't listened to their concerns.

The proposed law does allow copying from a CD to an iPod or creating a mash-up video on YouTube, but critics suggest a "super-clause" that makes it illegal to break digital locks on electronic content or devices will override parts of the bill that protect consumer rights.

That means you can copy a CD to your computer, but it may be illegal if the record label that produced it says so, critics say.

Concerns over consumer rights being trampled by the legislation are legitimate, Michael Geist told CTV News Channel Friday.

Geist, University of Ottawa research chair on Internet and e-commerce law, said there are similar provisions in C-11 that were contained in the now-defunct Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) that U.S. President Barack Obama shot down last month.

Similar to SOPA, the Canadian bill could cause websites like YouTube to be "offside of the law," he said.

The Internet advocacy group OpenMedia.ca argues C-11 will result in an Internet "lock-down" that will cut users off from content "for no good reason."

They have created a form opponents can fill out online that will be sent to the federal government and the prime minister.

"Canadians are fed up with our digital deficit, and with big media lobbyists pushing back against our interests," said OpenMedia executive director Steve Anderson in a release Friday.

"Canadians want an open and affordable Internet, not new restrictions. The majority of Canadians are against these provisions and it's time for our voices to be heard," he said.

Debate on the law ends Friday in the House of Commons and will then be sent to committee for review.

Digital freedom watchdog Access also declared Saturday the "International Day of Protest" against the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, an international treaty against content piracy.

Protests are being scheduled to be held in Canadian cities to support that grassroots movement as well as opposing C-11. Events will take place in Montreal, Edmonton, Regina and Moncton.

What really irks opponents of C-11 is the fact thousands of people provided input to the government in 2009 – more than 6,000 followed up in writing – stating the "super-clause" was bad policy.

Opponents at the time included teachers, libraries, privacy commissioners and artists, who suggested a compromise that the digital lock clause be amended so that it only applies to "willful copyright infringement."

In other words, it would target pirates who profit by stealing the work of the entertainment industry by breaking digital locks, not everyday people transferring data for their own use.

The government didn't heed that advice and pushed forward with the controversial clause in place, something opposite to what's happening in other countries like the United States.

Public outcry in the U.S. managed to kill SOPA, a law that targeted content piracy with the potential to block websites.

Critics said that could change the architecture of the Internet and lead to further censorship.


Comments are now closed for this story

Nazmul
said
0 0

What is the definition of so called free society? Politicians and through them big businesses like to control peoples everyday life through wired laws and regulations. I am sick and tired of it.


gregoryd
said
0 0

You know what irks me? The music industry and their arrogant attitude. Before the peer to peer sharing started, many artists did not even bother to tour. Shania twain for one. She did not tour for several years after her first hit album. Now everyone is touring. hmmm Maybe this is a good thing in some ways. Now they have to work for their money.


Karl
said
0 0

It is clear to me from some comments that people don't get what's at stake here. Opposing C-11 isn't promoting theft. C-11 goes much farther than protecting Copyright. It gives the entertainment industry carte-blanche to continue using an obsolete business model to increase an already massive profit margin while at the same time impinging on consumer rights. Some of the reasonable things you legally do now will be made illegal. I want my government to represent MY interests, not those of a paranoid, hypocritical industry mired in the 1960s.


whale33
said
0 0

I am sick & tired of the way industry and gov't treat us! If I buy a movie I should be able to watch it or copy it as many times as I wish for my own personal use! I also shouldn't be forced to watch the same previews and warnings when I'm watching a movie for 10th time, as happens in my house with kids around a lot. Fix these things and I will spend more money on cd's, movie's and legitimate downloads. Till then I will keep my money! Software copyright is even worse. I have to buy 2 copies of windows because I have 2 computers in the same house! Your copy of windows is only valid if you do not replace the motherboard. If you replace the motherboard your license is invalid! Read the fine print people!


Alex (Toronto)
said
0 0

If this kind of law had anything to do with preventing piracy and protecting copyright, nobody would object. The issue is whether the law should penalize consumers for using content that they've paid for just because of broken DRM systems. Corporations want to force people to buy a new copy every time they come with a new software player, or to debug applications that don't work correctly, or to not watch something at all if they happen to live in the wrong country. Media companies need to figure out how to sell products that work and that people want. When corporations use bad software and bad law against their customers, the free market finds workable alternatives. Intermediaries that can't find a way to make money from their creative talent will be replaced by more efficient competitors.


eddytoronto
said
0 0

The level of ACTA secrecy is highly unusual to me for an agreement focused on intellectual property issues...If adopted in its current form the treaty would have a significant impact on the Internet, leading some countries to adopt three-strikes-and youre-out policies that terminate subscriber access due to infringement allegations increasing legal protection for digital locks mandating new injunction powers...My Fellow Canadians I told You Your Government will shut Down Your iNet in Short Time...I said March is the month everything will start to break-down....


Jebus Widowmaker
said
0 0

Why not pass a bill to that after we buy the material the recording industry can come and take it back. This way here they have total control of how we use their product. We spend our money but they want to totally control how we can use it. Sounds fair to me. The police state is coming. Live free or die.


Herbert H. Ind
said
0 0

These companies have already proven they don't need these new laws to impose their copyrights. Megaupload is a perfect example of this. Days after SOPA and PIPA were struck down in the States, the U.S. went into another country and arrested all the employees of this company under the current legislation.These new provisions and laws that are lobbied by the music and movie industires are blatant attempts to censor and control the internet. Plain and simple.This has nothing to do with left or right. Get your political heads out of your butts and stand up for freedom of speech and the internet. This is one thing we can ALL unite on. Make a stand and let these companies know that we will not allow them to control what information we can and cannot see on a free internet. These laws will do NOTHING to stop piracy as there are already subnets and "off the grid" internets out there like "darknet" where the free trade of music and movies will continue while regular internet is censored and regulated to death while innocent citizens will be arrested and given absurd fines.


reidjr
said
0 0

TimThe thing is some think they should be able to download anything they want they claim the internet is a free place meaning there should be no rules.


Dave in F'ton
said
0 0

I had a huge tirade against Hollywood and the whole concept of them-not-updating-the-movigoing-concept-for-modern-times typed up, but I figured it'd be a lot easier to just say that dirt-cheap DVDs at used stores coupled with larger home TVs and comfy couches and affordable snacks beats getting gouged at the crowded overpriced multiplex any day of the week. Go ahead and "protect" your profits, you never had any from me to begin with.


James, Ontario
said
0 0

Brack Obama did not shoot down SOPA. His standing was intentionally ambiguous. This article contains political revisionism.


Mark in Wpg
said
0 0

@Craig: you're aware that the American technology and science industries have ground to a halt due to their country's irreparably broken copyright laws? Companies use patents as weapons to stifle innovation from competitors rather than as a means to protect their investment. Fun fact: the song "Happy Birthday" is still under copyright and so according to some of the comments here you're a dirty thief if you sing it without paying royalties until 2030 when the song falls in to the public domain. Only the most brain-dead of corporate shills would find that defensible, and they happen to be the ones pushing ACTA and C-11. Remember voters: the Conservatives are about small government for the corporations, big brother for the rest of us.


Jack (Wpg)
said
0 0

that's just great....while the american politicians smartened up and listened to their citizens, ours are going the way of placing restrictions like china...really smart move cdn politicians....cant wait for anonymous to hack into your computers and make you suffer...


Response
said
0 0

Susie in Mtl. It is very possible you will lose your 50s music on Google. It will actually be illegal for google to direct you to any music the performers or their estates don't want you to hear for free.


Jay
said
0 0

You have to admire the dedication and feeble attempts of governments to fix problems which don't exist, but passing more bureaucratic laws and confiscating domain names (like Megaupload) in favor of the entertainment industry is so futile that most people can't help but laugh at the ignorance of government officials. Look what happened years ago when Napster was shut down and turned into a for-profit community. Within months, several other similar networks popped up like: Limewire, Kazaa, eDonkey, and other free peer-to-peer programs. Then they took down the infrastructure of those peer-to-peer networks, and what did that do? It spawned the game-changing phenomenon known as torrents, and about a dozen or so clients like Azureus (now known as Vuze), uTorrent, and Bitcomet. If anything, this proves without a doubt that the government's actions are nothing but counter-productive and wasting tons of resources. The internet is like a giant hydra, and there's absolutely nothing any government can do to stop it (with the exception of a global EMP). If you try cutting off a hydra's head (or censoring information in the case of the internet), several heads will grow back in it's place. Taking down Megaupload did nothing but encourage it's community to expand and migrate elsewhere. Don't they realize that there are hundreds (possibly even thousands) of similar online file "storage lockers" and ftp servers? You can't deny the world's population what the majority of people want. The sooner they realize this, the sooner they can allocate their resources towards fighting real (violent) crimes which actually affect real victims.


Bad Bill
said
0 0

This law will NOT improve anything for anyone. I like being able to record a show and have it for as long as I want, or buying a CD and putting it on my computer / Ipod. This bill is a BAD idea. Too bad it's too late. Anyone who thinks the Conservative government will take anyone's opinion into account is deluded. This bill will be passed with limited debate in both the house and the senate as has everything else that's been done since the Conservatives got a majority.


CrackerJackLee
said
0 0

after reading susie's comment, i'm glad that i've been able to go to flea markets and value villages to buy lp's and cd's... i often felt that it was cheaper just to surf the internet... but now, it appears that they will close the doors on recorded music... all these copyrights have been bought as investments and access will cease until you pay... it's always best to have your own...


Tim
said
0 0

@Ashamed, maybe you need to re-read the article. This isn't about defending a right to theft, it's about protecting legitimate backups of overpriced software and an increasing amount of commercial involvement in political matters. Nobody here is saying we have a right to steal, but we do have a right to protect & backup material we've paid for. Under this law it would be illegal to put music from a CD onto an Ipod, or even to put it on our computer. It would also make websites responsible for what's posted on them. Say goodbye to Facebook, Youtube, Google and any other social network, they'll all go the way of Megaupload. Stop seeing the forest for the trees and look at the big picture, very little of this has to do with piracy and it all has to do with information control.


|Doug
said
0 0

To those who may believe they will benefit from this legislation I say 'you will not'.

Those who presently are taking your product for free will not now instantly switch to 'buying'; they will find another way to plug their ears with noise or move on to something else.

Wasted legislation and effort to try and save a few 'artists'.


Prairie Senior
said
0 0

Just another example of Harper supporting the top 10 percent at the expense of 90% of the population who don't benefit from this legislation


reidjr
said
0 0

Canadian BobThis is not a left vs right issue.


reidjr
said
0 0

jannana98 So someone downloads movies then sells them and makes a huge amount of money you really think thats fine then wow.


Jason
said
0 0

Just like with what happened in the US whether this law passes or not, nothing will change. Right now if a copyright owner contacts Youtube and asks them to take down a video because it infringes on their copyright, youtube takes it down. All these laws do is make it easier for copyright owners to protect their IPs. And even though sopa and pipa failed megaupload was taken down. The big evil corporation and government that stupid hippies are telling us to be afraid of don't exist.


Jayme
said
0 0

ChrisWhile i agree things should be better but i have a issue when people think they should be able to steal by watching what every they want etc.


Ashamed of some canadians
said
0 0

It sems that many of the above seem to feel it is their right to use someone elses hard work.
If I devised something and had it copyrighted then I would be really upset if someone else used it as their own


Susie-Q Mtl.
said
0 0

I really don't know much about this stuff. All i know is this:-When i want 50's music i go to Google, then i type in www.50's music, then i end up with all kinds of wonderful stuff. I even get 60's music as well. Will this bill prevent me from doing this? Does this mean the music on Google will now be different? I really don't understand anything about copy right laws etc. All i want is The Drifters singing Save The Last Dance For Me. I also like M.Buble's version as well. I want to hear Ritchie Valens singing La Bumba not Los Lobos Or Lou Diamond Philips. Can i still have this? I sure do hope so. I may soon be one unhappy person. Where can i find an old turntable & needles? The turntable must play 78's cause i still have them. Harper i hate you. I think you screwed up my Google music. Good day. Bye.


telephoto
said
0 0

Because the Conservative government has no guts to protect real property rights , they push this absurd of owning an idea.


Canadian Bob
said
0 0

I'm sure this will receive the full support of the narrow minded Harper fans who believe that everything he does is for the complete well being and benefit of all man kind (just so you know, I'm doing a "mock" bow to Harper as I type... honest!).


jannana98
said
0 0

well they are about to mke the common consumer criminals, so really if everyone just ignores the new rules it pretty much makes them useless. what are they going to do fine everyone, throw everyone in jail? No politician has the backbone to go ahead and try cause they would be out in the street in ablink of an eye.


Craig
said
0 0

If you don't respect and protect copyrights and patents, nothing new will ever be created.


Think for yourself
said
0 0

If anyone thinks ACTA is really about stoping piracy or counterfiting they are only looking at the tip of the iceberg. Blanket acts like these server to cripple consitutions and strip away many rights which were hard earned, often through blood. Do your own research on these matters. There will be a time when people will wonder what happened to their rights and by then it will be too late. Rights are easily taken away and considerably harder to get back.


Sydnee in AB
said
0 0

If this bill comes to fruition it WILL be into the record labels hands and we will all suffer. They are not protecting artists from piraters, they are protecting their profit margins. The government needs to listen to the people!!! We do not want Bill C-11 to go through!!!


Chris
said
0 0

All the law is going to do is encourage more piracy. i legally own about 1000 movies and I have about 500 pirated movies, all the movies I legally bought i'm forced to watch previews and copyright screens and warnings. the movies I downloaded i can just watch the movie and not waste 5 minutes of my time. how about not treating your customers like second class citizens and maybe piracy will decline. honestly, i refuse to buy movies nowadays because of the way i'm treated by the industry. if i buy a movie it better be DRM free and i better be able to watch it on anything I own. if not don't expect my money, because if i have to waste my time breaking the DRM to use the product i own, then why not just download it without DRM in the first place?


Mr.Me
said
0 0

"If you want to control the people, you must control the information they receive." Me


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Sci-Tech Stories

keyboard generic; computer; online crime

Researchers discover massive new cyberweapon

More    Comments    1 Video(s) 1

Models display a Samsung Galaxy S III, the latest smartphone in the company's Galaxy lineups, during its launching for media in Jakarta, Indonesia, Tuesday, May 22, 2012. Samsung said the phone, that has emerged as the biggest competitor to the iPhone, will go on sale in 145 countries with 296 phone companies, making it the company's biggest launch so far. (AP Photo/Dita Alangkara)

Samsung releases latest Galaxy smartphone in Europe

More

Cows are shown grazing on an organic dairy farm in Jordan, Minn., in a May 31, 2006 file photo. (AP / Jim Mone)

Massages and waterbeds boost milk output in cows

More