Sci-Tech -   

1
Canadian astronaut Chris Hadfield speaks at the Canadian Aviation and Space Museum in Ottawa on May 12, 2011. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Canadian astronauts could be grounded for years after next mission

Viewer

CTV News Video

Canada AM: Future of Canadians in space
Canadian astronauts are stuck on Earth with no scheduled missions before the end of the decade as of 2012. Randy Attwood, senior editor of Spaceref.ca, discusses whether the future of Canadian space research has been put on hold.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (7) Facebook   

Canadian astronaut Chris Hadfield speaks at the Canadian Aviation and Space Museum in Ottawa on May 12, 2011. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Photos

Canadian astronaut Chris Hadfield speaks at the Canadian Aviation and Space Museum in Ottawa on May 12, 2011. (Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

View Larger Image

Date: Mon. Dec. 26 2011 7:08 PM ET

MONTREAL — Canadian astronauts could be stuck on the ground for years following Chris Hadfield's space mission scheduled for 2012.

That six-month visit to the International Space Station, which begins next November when Hadfield blasts off in a Russian spacecraft, will mark the end of a busy era for Canadian space travel.

It's not clear when another Canadian will leave the planet, says an official at the national space agency.

"According to our agreement on the International Space Station we don't have a flight -- beyond Chris Hadfield -- before the end of the decade," Gilles Leclerc, the Canadian Space Agency's director-general of space exploration, said in an interview.

In the 27 years since Marc Garneau became the first Canadian to fly into space, a total of eight Canadians have taken 15 space trips, many of them enjoying several voyages into the cosmos.

For the next while, the Canadian space program will focus on sending not people, but machines into space -- like rovers and satellites for earth observation and military applications.

At one point Canada had six active astronauts. Now there are two young ones, but David Saint-Jacques and Jeremy Hansen still have to undergo a few years of training before any trip.

They will still get their chance -- eventually.

NASA has an agreement to ship all Canadian astronauts up to the space station as long at it's in orbit, which is until at least 2020. Because it helped build the space station using the giant robotic Canadarms, Canada gets "credits" for trips to the space station.

That basically means it's able to send an astronaut with the Americans picking up the tab, under a barter system.

One small problem: Canada has no credits left after Hadfield's flight.

"We've used up all our credits for transport of Canadian astronauts to the International Space Station," Leclerc said. "We're trying to negotiate a flight before 2019, obviously."

There may be another option. Since the retirement of the U.S. space shuttle fleet this year, the focus has been on commercially developed vehicles which will carry cargo and astronauts to the space station.

One U.S. firm, SpaceX, successfully launched its Dragon spacecraft atop a Falcon 9 rocket in December 2010 and it returned safely to Earth.

NASA has given the company the go-ahead to launch Dragon, in February 2012, to carry cargo to the International Space Station.

Leclerc points out that the Canadarm on board the space station will be playing a big part in that flight.

"We will capture the spacecraft as it approaches, so it's a new role for us and it's part of our duties on the International Space Station," he added. He said the Canadarm has already been used for a number of years to grab supply ships sent up by the Europeans and Japanese.

Leclerc says "it's highly possible" the next Canadian astronaut after Hadfield will be transported to the space station in a commercial rocket.

But that is also years away.

NASA had been hoping to use commercial flights to get astronauts to the space station in 2016. But that's now been pushed into the following year because of funding problems.

Since the retirement of the American shuttles, NASA has depended on the Russians to deliver astronauts to the space station. And now, because of the one-year delay in the development of commercial spacecraft, NASA will have to buy extra seats on the Russian Soyuz.

Despite the problems and delays, Leclerc has ruled out the possibility of Canada going ahead and buying its own seat on the Russian spacecraft.

"It's not something we can afford," he said, adding that the going rate for a seat on a Soyuz is between $50 million and $60 million.

Billionaire Guy Laliberte paid an estimated $35 million to the Russians to became the first Canadian tourist to visit the space station in 2009.

Leclerc predicts that, starting in 2012, a lot of changes are coming as commercial actors, like SpaceX, enter the scene: "In less than three or four years, you'll have regular private flights into space carrying tourists," he said.

Leclerc points to Virgin Galactic, which is already testing a commercial space ship to carry tourists into sub-orbital, brief low-altitude flights.

Seat tickets are priced at US$200,000 and more than 430 people have already made reservations.

"It's going to be like the very first days of aviation where it was quite an extraordinary thing for people to fly," Leclerc said.

Leclerc even ventured that "in 20 years, you'll be able to have a real honeymoon."

Comments are now closed for this story

RogerM
said

I believe there are and have been many more positive spinoffs from space research than our governments bureaucracy. Note this quote from the internet: "Space exploration is not a waste of money because there have been many technological advancements due to space exploration and research. Things such as kidney dialysis and the new artificial heart have been based on technology found in space shuttles. Without this research, many lives may have been lost due to kidney or heart failure. Space is not a waste of money because there have been many necessary technologies stemming from it."


Greg
said

Its our destiny to go beyond our Earth... don't be short minded...We are in the early days of Space Exploration, one day...somebody sometime will look back and recognize that the effort of the past have allowed us to move into the future.


R. in Alberta
said

Wow! how quick you all are to dimiss the relevance of space flight/exploration to your own personal lives!! .. Really!! .. are you that naiive? Every ounce of technology that has come out of NASA/other foreign governments effort to travel in space, conduct experiments at zero gravity and increase the knowledge about our planetary system along with those in our galaxy has a direct correlation to the technology and information you enjoy on a daily basis. Ex. Nano technology, the vast usage of satellites (world wide communication etc.), medicinal technology, weather and geophysical forecasting and the list goes on and on. That's like saying trees have no relevance to life on earth and re-forestation and governance of forests should not be funded. Although, the spending of these agencies needs to be reappropriated, to cease all exploration of space will be very costly in the long run! And don't for one second delude yourselves into thinking that if the vast cost/expenditures of space travel, research etc. ceases that all that money will be poored back into systems/research on the ground. Governments sing that song and dance to justify their actions but, it wil NEVER happen. Why don't you do a little research of your own and see once and for all how that money is being spent!! http://www.nasa.gov/ http://www.asc-csa.gc.ca/eng/default.asp Oh, wait! is that too hard?!? .. instead of relying solely on opinions of others to arrive at conclusions, why not find out for yourself the relevance and importance of such research!


Don
said

It would be cheaper to send all the criminals up to the space station and then let them go into outerspace.... Let "ET" deal with them!!!


FTF near Regina
said

Cut government spending...we don't need to be in space...


Jordan Hayes
said

It isnt of any relevence to my life style. The cost of bread increased .60 cents per loaf in 1 month. I dont even know what Hatfield accomplished while he was in space. He seems like a remarkably intelligent man but I dont know what he accomplished that contributed to the betterment of my life. My attention is all on Richard Branson. At least with him I could witness space travel and perhaps bunk in the planned moon hotel.


Raj
said

Lets not waste billions of public funds to create a few "heroes" and 100 millionaires who make something intangible for 99.999% of the population. Invest the money on ground in agriculture and other sustainable development. The West is going to have a tough decade or century ahead and it is the time to divert funds to where it provides immediate benefit to people. Why throw the money in space?


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Sci-Tech Stories

keyboard generic; computer; online crime

Researchers discover massive new cyberweapon

More    Comments    1 Video(s) 1

Models display a Samsung Galaxy S III, the latest smartphone in the company's Galaxy lineups, during its launching for media in Jakarta, Indonesia, Tuesday, May 22, 2012. Samsung said the phone, that has emerged as the biggest competitor to the iPhone, will go on sale in 145 countries with 296 phone companies, making it the company's biggest launch so far. (AP Photo/Dita Alangkara)

Samsung releases latest Galaxy smartphone in Europe

More

Cows are shown grazing on an organic dairy farm in Jordan, Minn., in a May 31, 2006 file photo. (AP / Jim Mone)

Massages and waterbeds boost milk output in cows

More