Sci-Tech -   

1

Ontario school cuts Wi-Fi over safety concerns

Wi-Fi
Wi-Fi

View Larger Image

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (20) Facebook   

Date: Thursday Sep. 8, 2011 10:05 PM ET

A private school in Ontario has cut its wireless Internet network over concerns that the technology causes health issues in students.

Pretty River Academy in Collingwood, Ont., a private school with 150 students attending kindergarten to Grade 12, is the first Ontario school to remove Wi-Fi from campus.

The school's old Wi-Fi system was taken out over the summer and replaced with Ethernet connections ahead of the first day of the school year.

In May the World Health Organization said radio frequency radiation from WiFi and cell phones posed a similar health threat to DDT, lead and car exhaust.

Principal Roberta Murray-Hirst says the new hard-wired Internet system is actually faster than their previous system and gives teachers control over when students can go online.

Murray-Hirst said they did not receive any complaints from students or parents about health concerns but decided to take the precaution anyway.

"We like to be proactive and obviously safety is always a concern," she said.

The debate over wireless Internet in Ontario schools grew heated last summer when a group of elementary school teachers attempted to have the technology banned from classrooms in the Niagara region.

The Elementary Teachers' Federation of Ontario voted in 2010 to keep wireless Internet. In August, the group voted to establish a committee for studying Wi-Fi in classrooms.

A group called the Safe Schools Committee has also continued to push for a ban.

They claim exposure to wireless Internet causes headaches, insomnia and rashes in students – afflictions that seem to subside on weekends and vacations, only to return when the kids go back to school.

Ontario's Chief Medical Officer of Health said wireless Internet posed no threat to children at schools.

Comments are now closed for this story

douggy doug
said

"These are the same radio waves that man kind has been living with for over 100 years."

[citation needed]

Also I suppose you live in a room filled with radio station transmitters, do you?


KJ in Kingston Ontario
said

Given the massive amount of electromagnetic radiation out in the environment this seems really really absurd.


Mighty Slug
said

Over-reacting? obviously someone with vested Interests. Perhaps it was the Class 2B Carcinogenic status, or the Tests by Magda Havaas Trent University which shows disruption to the heart, or the BioInitiative Report, Ecolog Studies, or perhaps http://wifiinschools.org.uk/resources/wifi+brain+July+2011.pdf or even http://www.citizensforsafetechnology.com/WiFi-in-Schools-Interview-with-George-Carlo,24,259. A school would not Risk saying it was for health reasons if it was not, that's not the easy option when you've got a billion dollar industry lobbying the Government to keep microwaving everyone. Think of the money$$$


Art Tricque
said

The above-mentioned on-line story contains a factual error. It says:

"In May the World Health Organization said radio frequency radiation from WiFi and cell phones posed a similar health threat to DDT, lead and car exhaust."

This is incorrect. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) of the World Health Organization classified radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as "Group 2B: possibly carcinogenic to humans". This is the same category as DDT, lead and car exhaust. However, the latter three substances primarily are problematic for health not because of their cancer status — their cancer-causing status is just as dubious as that for radiofrequency electromagnetic fields — ; rather, they are problematic because:

-DDT is an endocrine disruptor
-Lead is directly toxic to the body in several ways, causing problems with bones, teeth, collagen, vitamin D usage, etc.
-Car exhaust contains carbon monoxide binds to hemoglobin and prevents oxygen being delivered to the body, causing carbon monoxide poisoning

In the case of the original Safe School Committee press release (that lead to this CTV posting), while the facts are correct, the allusion to DDT, lead and car exhaust without supplementary information is deliberate poisoning of the well and scaremongering. People already know those substances are bad for health — it is just that it has nothing to do with cancer.


ArtTricque
said

SafeSchools said: "This is not the first school to ban wifi." But it is one of only a handful across the world. In the same period, *millions* of wifi base stations have been installed in schools, community centres, hospitals, restaurants, other public places along with homes and private businesses. As well, *hundreds of millions* of computers and portable devices capable of communicating by wifi have been purchased. This is a non-story. It is a press release issued by the slickly named Safe School Committee thanks to the media skills of board member Rodney Palmer, and it has made it to CTV only because of Rodney Palmer, ex-CTV correspondent.


Shem
said

The principal is still providing internet through ethernet so it is not that bad. If they were cutting internet out completely that would be an issue. I understand the safety concerns, it may not be something that we want to accept but it is still a concern.


Kevin
said

@SafeSchools:
Where is the evidence that the background microwave radiation is a BILLION times greater in Canadian Cities?
And to be placed on the 2b Carcinogen list does not imply that there is overwhelming evidence that it causes cancer, only that there MAY be a link. By your logic, all Bracken Ferns and Coffee will need to be removed as well (so long Timmies!)


Ken
said

I'm actually keenly interested in technology and its effects on students. There have been studies showing that "something" about wi-fi actually affect 3% of students. It's not a significant effect and at such a low percentage, it could be any number of uncontrolled "noise" variables.

My concern, however, is how quickly and vehement people are to dismiss the affects of wi-fi entirely. Why all the nerd rage?


megahurtz
said

Wonderful news. The World Health Organization recently looked at studies on WiFi base station signals on rats and it showed that long term use caused tumors to form. That is the reason they removed the wireless from the school. That school's principal read the proof that is now available for everyone to read. IT's called the Guy study and it was financed by the US government.


Terry
said

This sounds like a school day issue. Do kids not have these symptoms from cell phone use, since most teens have the cell phone glued to their ear. Hmm sound fishy to me. Mc Donalds in my area has WIFI and look at the # of teens that work there and eat there. Over-reaction, I think so. Does playing video games for hours not affect the teens, only at school. ???


manner
said

Is David Suzuki on their board?


AM
said

Headaches, insomnia & rashes.....sounds just like regular old school stress to me. Of course it subsides on the weekends!
I bet most adults have these symtpoms Monday thorugh Friday as well!


Kevin
said

The 'real' reason they moved away from WIFI was for technical (faster) and policy (internet control) issues, NOT for safety concerns...
If no parent complained, there was no incentive to move away from WIFI for safety concerns (of which there are really none). Sounds like she is using the fear mongering to get additional funding...


SafeSchools
said

This is not the first school to ban wifi. The Saanich District school Board in BC already banned it in all of its elementary schools. And schools in France and UK pulled it out after it made kids sick. As for the sun creating microwaves, the background microwave levels in Canadian cities is now a billion times higher than occurs naturally. And the World Health Organization doesn't put agents or substances on its Class 2b Carcinogen list without overwhelming evidence. Any further evidence will include dead bodies and perhaps the school administration has determined that this level of "evidence" is not required.


Matt Armstrong
said

WHO is full of it. They can't seem to get anything right. The power emitted from a WAP (wireless Access Point) is no where NEAR the power that would cause the issues mentioned. How many of those people have wireless networks in their home? Heck, malls, coffee shops, libraries, etc are all installing them. This is nothing more than fear mongering. "THE SKY IS FALLING! THE SKY IS FALLING!"

There have been so many studies done that say that its safe, and that its dangerous, its turning in to another "Cell phones cause cancer". Heck, Radio waves from AM and FM radio are more powerful than WiFi. Why don't they start banning radio?


John
said

It's so nice to see that a private school is actually concerned with education :/

I think they should hire someone who actually knows something about physics -- or perhaps someone who understands the WHO is actually pretty lousy at identifying dangerous substances and materials.


Bob lolaw
said

If of all, how many students? Is it 1 or 200. Second, if they're getting rashes, headaches, etc then that would most like point to an environment contaminant.... Perhaps things like the cleaning products used in the school?


mark
said

"They claim exposure to wireless Internet causes headaches, insomnia and rashes in students"

These same symptoms can be brought upon by many things, stress being one of them.


Melissa
said

What a crock! In this day and age, where on earth can you go and not be within range of a wireless signal?! Nearly all public places have wifi, regardless of whether it's just for employees or for public use. Do these folks not have wifi at home? If not, do they show symptoms when they stay in hotels? What about when they grab a coffee at Starbucks? While there may be health risks linked to wifi, I doubt they cause the symptoms described, or else they would have them all the time. Wifi is everywhere.


SteveinToronto
said

I can see cutting the wi-fi to prevent kids from accessing the internet and cheating - however to say their cutting it due to safety concerns is crazy. These are the same radio waves that man kind has been living with for over 100 years. Solar radition is more dangerous than radio waves, yet we don't see people staying indoors. Riding the bus to school is more dangerous than radio waves. More kids have died in the last 100 in school bus accents than from radio waves.

Some people need to re-evalute their lives if they are so afraid of every little thing. We're teaching our kids to be weaklings with no strength to survive the hardships of life. They're going to become adults who expect the world to be handed to them without a fight.




Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Sci-Tech Stories

keyboard generic; computer; online crime

Burlington, Ont. seen as hotbed for cybercrimes

More   20 Comments 20    1 Video(s) 1

In this photo released by www.frogindia.org, chikilidae eggs are shown in the soils of northeast India.

New family of legless amphibians found in India

More