Sci-Tech -
News Sections
Consumer outrage over eco-fees grows
CTV News Video
|
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
ctvottawa.ca
Date: Fri. Jul. 9 2010 5:16 PM ET
It's only nine days old, but already there have been complaints about retailers gouging customers on the eco fee added to thousands of products in Ontario.
The new fee quietly came into effect on July 1, the same day as the Harmonized Sales Tax, and affects a long list of products including aerosol containers, fire extinguishers, fluorescent tubes, syringes and needles, and all toxic, corrosive and flammable products.
However, some consumers reported they were getting charged above and beyond what the fee called for. Stewardship Ontario, the organization responsible for the fee, said they are looking into it.
Not a tax, a levy: Stewardship Ontario
Liberal MP Yasir Naqvi said none of the money would line government coffers.
"They are levied by the industry, and collected by the industry to ensure the products are being properly diverted and recycled."
Further, Stewardship Ontario insisted the fee is not a tax. Rather, it should be considered a levy.
Blame for not informing consumers
The first phase of eco fees were introduced on July 1, 2008. The fees go to various stewardship councils across the province to ensure hazardous materials don't end up in landfills.
The fees range from a few cents to several dollars, depending on the product. For example, the rate for batteries is based on weight.
Naqvi said Stewardship Ontario has existed since 2003, and just recently more items were added to the program, quietly.
He placed the blame on the organization for not informing consumers.
"They should have done a far more better job in communicating any changes that came July 1."
With a report from CTV Ottawa's Karen Soloman
User Tools
Related Stories
Most Popular
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
But they probably get straight As for computer games and TV.
Email
Comments are now closed for this story
Steve in Ottawa
said
Loosen up posters!
What they do is focus where and how our governments work or don't work. It is easy to be an environmentalist when it doesn't cost you anything. When sleazy politicians charge "eco fees" it focuses the cost of environmentalism and the makes people look at exactly where and how the money is spent. This is good becasue it starts to root out inefficiency. We are now at the maximum tax levels sustainable by society. Further tax increases are regressive, hurting the economy, and so government are going to have to cut. Having a visible fee makes it easy to justify or not and is a good financial discipline.
So, eco fees are really just another tax, (or a "levy" as a politician would say) but they are ones that are visible and targetable. Lets see how long they last under scrutiny. It is better to hae new taxes that are targeted than those general revenue ones that you can't justify.
Elias Nasrallah
said
serge
said
Dennis R
said
So to that end start taking everything back to the retailers where you purchased it as you have paid for this priviage now and they must deal with it then.
PLEASE PLEASE do not forget at election time that most if not all Liberals are guilty of this TAX Agression, McGuinty may have thought it up but none of his spineless, gutless, wonders (his Liberal tribe) stood up against it/him and it is our fault as we trusted them, the question is will it be our fault again? If we vote them back in of course it will, I say clean house, NO LIBERALS PERIOD, vote for those who will REMOVE THE HST, but more important who will put into place/Law a RE-CALL avenue where we can remove those who lie, cheat and work against us and that which they promised to do if they should get elected.
To DOUG I hope and prey you are right but we have to over ride all those who vote Liberal because their grandpa did their dad did and so they will do as well, you know all those who have no mind of their own and can't see the end of their nose to spite there face and we all know their out there!!
dajamies
said
Donna Diabetic
said
Sean H. in Ottawa
said
This is ridiculous... I mean. I give up. No matter who we vote in this will never end. I'm going to go back to an agrarian lifestyle... Who am I kidding? They just levy me for being to good to the environment. Ugh... I'm tired of working just to lose 60% of my wages to either income tax of taxes when I purchase things.
bob in ottawa
said
Fat chance.
john
said
Larry W
said
For the 675 ml of dish soap which is used daily, 674.5 mls eventually goes down the drain. Is that harmful?
Then they want to set a levy on the remainder 0.5 mls to ensure the container is disposed correctly.
Its a government initiative so it doesn't have to make sense or be logical.
Wonder if there is a person at the other end of the blue box sorting out different containers?
Martin Lacasse
said
glen
said
andre
said
reidjr
said
There are some thing in the states that do cost more then here.
Doug
said
Wrong!! This is why we collectively elected Mike Harris in the first place and it is why we will get rid of McGuinty come next election.
Wait for him to start shovelling out the money to bribe us as the election nears.
It won't work this time. Bye bye Dalton.
Donna
said
Samantha
said
Fed up with Governments
said
I just wish policitians would try to be honest.
Quit reaching into my pocket because you cannot manage the tax dollars wisely.
DonnyBoy
said
Soon your receipt for a can of Peas will look like this:
Peas - $0.19.
Peas shipping fee - $0.15.
Peas can fee - $0.14.
Peas admin - $0.42.
Peas - Fair Trade Fee - $0.10.
TOTAL PEAS: $1.00.
Of course, all we'll get to see on the ad and shelf is $0.19...