News Sections
Afghan mission about goals, not deadlines: NATO
CTV News Video
|
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
A A |
Email
|
Print
| Comments (21)
| Add Comments
Tweet
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Thu. Sep. 6 2007 3:12 PM ET
The mission in Afghanistan does not have a fixed end date, says a top NATO official, who says the goal is for Afghans to take over their own security.
"We have a requirement to ultimately help the Afghans develop those security forces and security mechanisms that will allow them to take those matters into their own hands," Canadian Gen. Ray Henault, chair of NATO's military committee, told a news conference in Ottawa on Thursday.
"There isn't a date you can set on that. It's an 'end state.'"
Henault acknowledged that Canada is only committed to its present mission in Kandahar province until February 2009.
The fate of that mission is the source of significant political controversy. Even the government is hinting that the current mission, involving about 2,500 troops, won't continue in its current configuration.
"A lot of things happen in 18 months," Henault said. "We're certainly hopeful Canada will find a way to continue to operate in Afghanistan."
The general also noted that the Netherlands are also engaging in debate about whether to maintain a combat presence in Afghanistan. Dutch troops currently operate in Uruzgan province, immediately north of Kandahar province.
"The Dutch have been marvellous ... they have done some great work," he said.
About 1,500 Dutch troops are operating in Afghanistan. That country's mission will end in August 2008 if the Dutch Parliament doesn't vote in favour of an extension.
NATO does have a planning process that's looking at how missions can be maintained using member countries' troops, he said.
NATO military chiefs are meeting in Ottawa today. They will be holding a conference in Victoria, B.C., to discuss future strategy.
The chiefs of defence from all 26 NATO countries meet three times a year -- twice in Brussels and once in a host nation.
Gen. Rick Hillier, Canada's chief of defence staff, is the official host of the conference.
The delegates, who number more than 100, are meeting to help develop a long-term, strategic perspective on alliance operations and capabilities.
The strategy sessions are important to help build consensus on what advice to provide NATO's civilian decision-making body -- the North Atlantic Council (NAC).
The Military Committee must provide consensus-based advice to NAC before any NATO military action or activities are approved.
Meanwhile, protesters opposed to NATO are planning demonstrations throughout the weekend, timed to coincide with the summit in Victoria.
Joan Russow, of the Global Compliance Research Project, told The Canadian Press that she's urging protesters to condemn NATO for its "destruction of the planet (and) ongoing violations of international laws.''
A mass rally is planned for noon on Saturday at the B.C. legislature.
User Tools
CTV News
Canada in Afghanistan
The latest news, photos and interactives from Canada's mission in Afghanistan.
Soldiers Overcome Injuries
Wounded soldiers use sports to overcome injuries, adjust to their new reality.
Interactive
Lessons Learned
A number of the medical innovations that we now take for granted were conceived and tested during wartime.
Bios and Pictures
Canadian Casualties
We remember those who lost their lives in Afghanistan since the mission began in 2002.
In Pictures
Most Popular
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
It is about time - as a grandparent I have watched our kids (who were allowed to fail although I do remember some nagging on our part) learn, I have watched our children now micro-manage their children. A big part of it is the fact that there are predators out there and an extreme reluctance on the parents part to alllow freedom that might result in the children becoming victims.









Add New Comment ( )
John
0
said
0
Jon
0
said
0
It is good thing that pre-world war two Canada wasn't made up of the people making comments here.
Shame on you, plain selfish.
Deny
0
said
0
Catherine Forks
0
said
0
Paul Martin moved our troops from Kabul to the more volatile region in the south in Nov. 2005.
Stephen Harper with full approval from Parliament
had no choice but, to extend the mission. He had been in government less than 3 months.
ron
0
said
0
This weeks report leaked to the Globe and Mail has pointed out Canada in not on their agenda for protecting or not a goal they can achieve at this time. Would Canada not come first in their personal interests?
Only things they seem to be interested in are the American agendas that we conveniently title NATO or coalition goals.
We can change this by voting for anyone, but a Conservative.
Mark Brooks, Ontario
0
said
0
Dave
0
said
0
dan
0
said
0
Al
0
said
0
I say this proudly!
Martin
0
said
0
Take a good hard look at the worlds recent history. Think of places where international inaction fostered bloodbaths, places like The Congo and Rwanda. Look at Bosnia and Somalia where the idiocy of trying to be peacekeepers in a war zone was proven to be worse than useless.
I'm glad that the Canadian public wasn't suddenly looking for exit strategies after Dieppe.
Canadian
0
said
0
We need to get out of that country and let the US deal with the mess they started and stop aligning Canada with the US - we do not need Republican money funding our politicians' campaigns.
We need, at the helm, someone who has Canadian values at heart - not U.S. ones. I do not care much for Dion either, but at least he will not be the yes man to US War of Terror and the mess and hate it is creating around the world.
ANd geeze, all I need is some military cronie telling me what Canada should be doing. The mission in Afghanistan is all about pipelines, oil and spending billions on weapons to kill. This is not leadership - this is madness Steve.
No thanks to the Tories and the lies.
Just my view.
Neil
0
said
0
Zach
0
said
0
Walter
0
said
0
Thomas Chan
0
said
0
Dana
0
said
0
Scott
0
said
0
Yes we need combat troops there. Because Al-Qaeda and their Taliban allies seek to destroy any reconstruction plans we have. And the Taliban don't care if they we wear blue helmets or green ones, they will try to kill us anyways. Sorry to burst anybody's ideal peacekeeping bubble.
Allan Eizinas
0
said
0
That being the case, why did this meeting not take place in Kandahar?
Would it not have been more appropriate for all of the Generals of NAYO to meet where their soldiers were also deployed?
Jonathan Sinclair
0
said
0
We must weigh the cost of completing the job against the cost of abandoning it and the innocent civilians who will be left behind.
GG
0
said
0
DERON
0
said
0