Politics -   

1
Finance Minister Jim Flaherty (right) along with his deputy Minister Rob Wright start a meeting with their provincial and territorial counterparts at Meech Lake, Que. Monday May 25, 2009 (THE CANADIAN PRESS / Fred Chartrand) Ontario Finance Minister Dwight Duncan makes his way to a meeting with his provincial and territorial counterparts at Meech Lake, Que. on Monday, May 25, 2009. (Fred Chartrand/ THE CANADIAN PRESS) Finance Minister Jim Flaherty (right) along with his deputy Minister Rob Wright start a meeting with their provincial and territorial counterparts at Meech Lake, Que. Monday May 25, 2009 (THE CANADIAN PRESS / Fred Chartrand)

Deficit to be 'substantially more' than projected

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV News: Robert Fife on the federal deficit
Finance Minister Jim Flaherty said Monday that the federal budget deficit will be 'substantially more' than what was forecast in January. This has many concerned about the state of pensions and employment insurance.
CTV Newsnet: Ian Lee, Carleton University on Canadian pensions
Ian Lee says the IMF has released a report on Friday listing Canada as the country with the lowest debt to GDP ratio, an indication more stimulus measures may be taken in the fall.
CTV Newsnet: Tom Clark on Flaherty's announcement of the substantial deficit
Critics say the $34 billion deficit was 'too rosy' and some experts are forecasting a deficit of $15-$17 billion more. There is no word yet on what areas need more money, but employment insurance and pensions were hot topics at the Meech lake meeting.
Finance Minister Jim Flaherty holds a news conference after Meech Lake meeting, part one
Flaherty says the ministers had a positive and collaborative attitude at the meeting, and that was evident with plans for substantial stimulus for the Canadian economy, which Flaherty says tops in the G7.
CTV Newsnet: Ont. Finance Minister Dwight Duncan speaks at press conference on stimulus meeting, part two
The ministers agreed to create a working research group of ministers and officials to look at the question of pension adequacy. Duncan says this will be of greater significance in the coming weeks and requires extensive work in that area.
CTV Newsnet: Bruce Hicks, University of Montreal on the importance of the meeting
The meeting of Canada's finance minister doesn't accomplish anything in itself, but the anticipation of the meeting between officials is essential for the stimulus package.
CTV Newsnet: Don Drummond, chief economist for TD Bank, on the plan for pensions
Finance Minister Jim Flaherty says there's a strong spirit of co-operation between him and his provincial counterparts as they discuss the economy at a meeting in Quebec on Monday.
CTV Newsnet: BNN's Michael Kane discusses Flaherty's optimistic outlook
Finance Minister Jim Flaherty says important that the feds and the provinces work together to get the country through the recession.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (114) Facebook   

Date: Tue. May. 26 2009 8:56 AM ET

Finance Minister Jim Flaherty said Monday the federal deficit will be "substantially more" than the government projected in January's 2009-2010 budget.

The initial deficit forecast was $34 billion. But Flaherty said that government revenues have been hit harder by the recession than expected.

"We will run a larger deficit in this year than anticipated in January, and I'll report further on that when the government reports to the people of Canada and Parliament in June with our update," he said.

The government has also forecast a $30-billion deficit for 2010-2011, and more deficits in the following three years.

Flaherty's comments came after a meeting with his provincial counterparts in Chelsea, Que., as the provinces push for more money from Ottawa to help them cope with the financial downturn.

The ministers decided to form a study group that will examine Canada's private pension plan system. Flaherty's parliamentary secretary, Ted Menzies, will oversee the group.

Ontario Finance Minister Dwight Duncan and other provincial ministers had called on the federal government to focus on the lack of retirement savings among Canadians, as the recession erodes people's bank accounts.

"We need to look at the question of pension adequacy," Duncan told CTV's Power Play. "In Ontario -- and I think the number is comparable across the country -- only about 30 per cent of people have a private pension."

He also said many of those with pension plans are not maximizing their savings with the various tax incentives, and that increasing longevity is also having an impact.

"We're living longer," he said. "The costs associated with getting older, like heavier medical needs and heavier long-term care needs, mean that our costs are going to be higher than I think many of us are anticipating."

Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty said on Monday he personally asked Prime Minister Stephen Harper to host a national summit to develop polices that will maintain a decent retirement income for seniors.

McGuinty rejected a call from Ontario's New Democrats on Monday to establish a provincial pension plan for the two-thirds of people who don't have a workplace pension. But he told the legislature if the federal government fails to act, it's something he would consider.

McGuinty said that most premiers agree the issue needs to be dealt with at the national level even though British Columbia and Alberta mulled over the possibility of setting up their own provincial plans.

Demands for Ottawa to act have been increasing as private pension schemes falter and stocks suffer from the recession.

TD Chief Economist Don Drummond said many Canadians have been left with inadequate amounts of savings in their Registered Retirement Savings Plans.

He said the Canadian Pension Plan only replaces about a quarter of one's earnings after retirement and as the baby boomers begin to retire, the system will be put under considerable stress.

"There is an onus on the public policy authorities either to make other alternative plans available voluntarily or perhaps even make it compulsory," he told CTV Newsnet.

Although the Conservatives have introduced incentives for Canadians to save money such as tax-free savings accounts, they have been reluctant to shore up pension savings on a broad scale.

Rather, the government has so far directed its efforts to study how to preserve the small amount of workplace pension plans regulated by Ottawa.

Flaherty said pensions will be a major part of the discussion and agreed with Duncan that the issue needs a national approach, even though only 10 per cent of private pensions are regulated by the federal government

"We're all Canadians, we're all in this together," he said Monday.

Employment insurance

Earlier Monday, Duncan said that Canada should not enter into an election at this time over the contentious issue of reforming employment insurance.

Despite Ontario's criticism of the current EI system, which leaves Ontarians facing tougher eligibility requirements than other Canadians, Duncan said he does not favour an election.

"We prefer not to see an election right now, we prefer to see real change to provide fairness for the unemployed," he said on his way into a meeting with the Jim Flaherty and other provincial finance ministers.

Hit with massive layoffs in the auto sector, Ontarians still need 420 hours of work to qualify for EI, which Duncan said is too many.

"The rules that are in place now were set a time when the economy was very different," he added.

Drummond told CTV Newsnet the EI system is "badly broken," adding that regional differentiations for eligibility are at the heart of the problem.

He said it's harder for workers to qualify for EI in areas with lower unemployment because they are required to have worked more hours to be eligible.

Still, it's difficult to find jobs in these areas, he said, and that's leaving many Canadians who have paid into the system for years without assistance just because of where they live.

Human Resources Minister Diane Finley said Monday that unemployed Canadians would be better served by job training than revamping the EI system.

"Going into this recession, unlike previous ones, we had significant skills shortages right across the country in a wide range of professions," she told Power Play. "We need to encourage people to get those skills for the jobs of the future."

With files from The Canadian Press

Comments are now closed for this story

Nancy: NDP to Replace Liberals as Official Opposit
said

Guess we cannot afford any stupid EI changes like 45 days work for a year of fre income.
The NDP is looking good to relpace the Liberals as the official opposition party.


Marg MM
said

To farther west of the rockies.

You better enjoy the Tory times also, because if and when the Liberals get in power,we will ALL be in worse shape and our pockets will be picked dry. Be careful what you wish for.


Retired Soldier in Kingston, ON
said

Reference naive and Liberal readers painting Finance Minister, Jim Flaherty as evil incarnate for forecasting a rising deficit!

Fast re-wind to the early 1970's when Pierre Elliot Trudeau decided to start the country on its downward spiral with constantly increasing budgets, and hand-outs to any special interest group! Result...the phenomenon of ever increasing deficits and political "spin" by Liberal MP's to support spending programmes at any cost!

And then we had Paul Martin, Liberal Finance Minister of the 1990's cutting 30,000 soldiers and raiding military budgets to the tune of tens of billions of dollars so the Liberals could lie to gullible voters and their media acolytes that they had... "tamed the deficit"!

Sure...but at what expense to the country, its most vulnerable and its global foreign policy?

Andrea in Ottawa
said

oh my gosh,things are going to get really crazy if they do release another stimulus package.


farther west of the Rockies
said

Hey Tim from Calgary

Harper is a big boy, nobody forced him to do anything he didn't want to do, blaming a potential coalition for this deficit is crazy.
Harper could of called their bluff & called an election to get this so called majority you Con lovers like to say will happen, but the fact is we were already in deficit when Harper called the election in October( remember the steady as she goes & we're gonna have a small surplus for 2009)
all lies from the same Finance minister who kept a multi million dollar deficit from the Ontario tax payers during an election when he was then their finance minister. All you Harper lovers better enjoy the Tory times now because I guarentee you they will come to an end by December'09 ( unless Harper stalls parliment and any confidence votes as was reported here last week so he can be at the 2010 winter Oylmpics in Vancouver....HMMM this guy really is a piece of work.


Jackie Barrett
said

Sounds like its time to get rid of the Conservative Party of Canada before someone does a documentary similar to IOUSA called IOCanada.

IOUSA is a documentary about America's debt crisis, and also its poor economic performance including savings deficits, budget deficits, negative current account, and a leadership deficit similar to George W. Bush and Stephen Harper.

The way Harper and Flaherty are going, it won't be long until Canada joins Great Britain and USA as most indebted nations.

Away with the neo-cons, bring in the New Democrats and Liberals.


Farther west of the Rockies..
said

Hey WEST*OF*** THE**ROCKIES**

Get your facts straight before you start spewing your right wing narrow minded nonesence..This Deficit has nothing to do with the Liberal party , This is currently going to become the biggest deficit in CANADIAN HISTORY !! by a sitting Canadian Government & Yes it's bigger than the one The Trudeau Liberals had back in the 70's . All You Western con supporters gotta get past this whole Trudeau's the reason for our whooohs, the guy is dead & has not been Prime Minister since 1984 & for the 10 years after he left we had a Conservative Government in power who made the deficit ever bigger. It's now 2009 Time to get over all this anti Trudeau crap... all the negativaty & venom that you hold is not healthy for anyone.


Jay, Ottawa
said

Mark From Sask said, "...and that we as taxpayers are even considing bailing out private pension plans infuriates me!"

Mark is right. All this bail out money devalues our currency. It says, "here, this stuff is useless - take a pile of it".


Walter (Winnipeg)
said

All Governments should also work on wage parity between government and the private sector, where we find a difference of 30%.


Jay, Ottawa
said

Flaherty was a disaster in Ontario and now he's bringing that history to the federal level.

First they didn't see a recession as even possible, now they can't forecast with any reliability.

His incompetence is going to cost us all through the devaluation of our currency in the long term.


Joe Canada
said

Canada would be in much better shape if Harper and these abject failures did not play politics with our economy and cut the GST.

No rational Canadian would ever support these outright liars and abject failures when it comes to managing our economy.



Jay-TO
said

Economy has tanked and we are going to more in the red than indicated. Meanwhile, conservatives are making attack ads, attack websites, etc.

Priorities please. Or give someone else a chance to lead or another poltical party.


Herb
said

Let's not stray from the fact that the CPC was waay off in their predictions. This is the same party that said in October that Canada would not enter into a recession, nor would the gov't have to run a deficit. These are facts. They have no clue what's going in, because they can't even ballpark things. They are rank amateurs and have not business being in power. The sooner we kick these second-rate thinkers and hayseeds out, the sooner we can get down to fixing the problems.


tired of political garbage
said

OK here i go, on the subject of EI, talk about change right, well here is one for though,, what about us working folks that get hurt on the job and nobody files for compensation, they prefer to file for medical ei benefits, hey ya get 15 weeks, but what if you are off longer than that, i have been off on med leave since nov 17th, had some much trouble getting ei, always needing more information, now i am in therapy for my back finally and hey ei ran out, cant go back to work yet, no funds coming in,, what about expanding ei to cover the amount of time you are out,, we work very hard for the jobs we do, seems like that isnt even coverd, and i will be darned if i am going on social assistance not for a short 6weeks that is crap,, we have to chance ei to reflect the needs of us who do not abuse it,, get it fixed or prepare to leave office, elections may not be wanted but the darn things make all of you work, just like i have too.....thanks for reading,


retdhairy
said

The Canadian Forces is recruiting in pretty much all fields. Good pay, good benefits, a pension after 25 years of service. Maybe its time to give to your country rather than taking.


Disappointed Canadian
said

I wonder why the stimulus $$ does not seem to be spent yet (where) new bridges, etc,they be better off giving every canadian real $$ to spend like the cash they gave to the auto sector


Marg MM
said

To: Reece,

Are you old enough to know how the Liberals balanced their budgets? Off-loading to provinces, cutting to the bare minimum the armed forces, raiding the EI fund to the tune of millions. These are just a few of the things they have done in the past.They like to take, take,take, but never want to give anything back to those that they took from.

As to the EI, 360 days is just too short of a time to work to be able to collect a year of EI. Most people that have recently lost jobs would have probably worked full time, so this is not an issue.

What we need is less government in our pockets, not more, which is what we would have with the Liberals.
Most of us are able and willing to work hard and are not whining and looking for handouts.


Frustrated
said

Way to drive Canada into the ground boys.




Skippy
said

WOW. Who could have predicted this especially after billions of taxpayer dollars are given to auto manufacturers and financial institutions and right out of no where they say the deficit will be larger than predicted. Stunning. No one could have ever seen this coming.
Tax payers bailing out international corporations and some of the most powerful financial institutions on the planet and the taxpayers get the bill. BARF. this is anything but democratic.


PeaDoubleyew
said

Bottom line is that this problem is in every country in the world. Economists, statisticians and social scientists have been warning of this, but nobody in authority seems to notice.


World Bank says unemployment will get WORSE.
said

The head of the World Bank has warned that the global economic crisis could lead to serious social upheaval.

"If we do no take measures, there is a risk of a serious human and social crisis with very serious political implications," Robert Zoellick said.

He pointed to Eastern Europe, which faces the "tricky situation" of fast-shrinking economies and protests.

Mr Zoellick suggested governments should start preparing for high levels of unemployment.


So U Hate Autoworkers
said

GEE I wonder if all those lost CAW autoworker jobs has any thing to do with the deficit racing out of control.They are not paying taxes and collecting EI so the government loses twice. DUHH


lp4
said

really? that`s a surprise, not. the headline should say Jimbo is more clueless than he appears


Call the federal election NOW.
said

Get the Conservative incompetents out before they wreck the country.


WestofTheRockies
said

Hey Reece,

Please tell us how the Liberals, (creator's of Canada's debt) would hve managed this recession without bringing in deficit budgets? tell the world it's over? or........

More broken promises like the last times, like enact a new NEP which they didn't say they would do, boost the gas tax 10 cents/ltr which they said they wouldn't but did, renegotiate NAFTA which they said they would but didn't or eliminate the GST for example which they said they would do but didn't? All broken promises or would they manage by downloading the cost of Federal programmes to the Provinces which they did last time when they couldn't fufill their mandate??

They didn't balance anything they just moved the debt around.

Sure you can trust those Liberals.

Which shell is the pea under Reece.


ndper
said

if he hadnt cut taxs this would not be soo bad
get the gst up to 20% where it should be.


Tim from Calgary
said

If anyone is blaming the Harper government for this deficit, then place full blame on Layton and Dion because they were the ones that forced Harper to spend money with their idiotic coalition threat. The NDP and the Liberals are the ones that would spend money silly and raise inflation. Harper was forced to do this by Layton and Dion.


Tim in Edmonton
said

guess now would be a good time to bring out another round of Iggy hate to distract everyone. Good job on leading our country there Steve-o! NAT!


WELFARE BUM
said

I want the politicians to join me in the welfare/unemployment lines to see what the real world is about.


M.Cousineau
said

Remember Flaherty when he was in Ontario Harris Gov?
More of the same now at the federal level with Harper.
We certainly do not need more of the same.
Forecast to satisfy politic not the tax payers.Then latter says sorry, we made a mistake. The Oposition made us do that mistake.
We need to change this Cons goverment the sooner the better.



Johnnie Oil
said

no body to blame but the libs, ndp and greedy lazy unions - all whinning and crying spend more, save me wah-wah!!
the conservatives caved on thier base and ethics in fear of an election and we all want to be like Iggies best buddy - obama "let just print more" and it's bushes fault. what a joke! no accountability for anyone or corporation, the whole system is a joke from village major to PM


Mary in Calgary
said

This is ridiculous! They want to waste even more tax-payer money!???

Do they even know how to save? Living in Alberta it shows how a once powerhouse economic province was shaken to the ground by our conservative premier in no time during the recession. Now these conservatives want to implement this to the rest of Canada!

Bring on an election! We'll show them!


gerald
said

Don't be fooled by the rhetoric!
only approx. 7% of the money allocated for these hard economic times has actually been spent (ctv news). The tories are coming out with this to counter the liberal initiative for improved EI. Don't be fooled by the rhetoric!


kate
said

No surprise here, bailing out CAW pensions on tax payers backs and wasting more money on the bankrupt auto industry will be borne by many future generations. Who cares about the rest of us, as long as your union buddies are taken care of so they will vote you back in..then it's all good right Jim and Stephen?


Bob in Lewisporte
said

And WHO does THAT surprise, hmmmm??


I LOVE UNIONS
said

Jim Flaherty said the deficit has nothing to do with him.


Jim in Edmonton
said

The danger is running excessively high deficits is what happened to Britian - get your countries credit rating depreciated. This means higher interest rates and even greater deficits! If we can hold the line as much as possible we can come out of this with some kind of stability. I am happy that the conservatives are keeping a hold of the purse strings. They can still make this work.


JIM FLAHERTY
said

Dont blame me I got nothing to do with it.


Mark From Sask
said

As a self employed person who is not elligable for EI, and is responsible to make sure I put away money to fund my retirement. The thought of making it so someone only has to work for a few weeks to get EI, and that we as taxpayers are even considing bailing out private pension plans infuriates me!


Madeleine
said

Well, of course there'll be a deficit. It's apparent that this deficit is coming at the same time at the GM and Chrysler bankruptcies. We have to keep CAW members accustomed to the lifestyle they think they deserve. I'm sure they figured this in, with room to bump it up if necessary. How one union can control this whole entire country is beyond belief. Thanks, Harper and Flaherty and McGuinty, for putting the rest of us in the negative to cater to these bozos.


Think twice before you force another election
said

Doing simple math: Iggy born May 12, 1947 = 62 years!

Lived outside of Canada 34 years (62-34) = 28 years in Canada.

19 years to age of adult and to vote (28-19) = 9 years.

Iggy has lived 9 years as a adult eligible to vote in Canada.

Isn't there a minimum requirement that should be established to become Prime Minister of a Country?

Maybe not, but I would say this man sure doesn't qualify for my vote, regardless of his Liberal platform (whatever that is these days)


David
said

Why do 99% of our politicians give the rest a bad name?


MW in Thunder Bay
said

Yet another reason why I'm glad I quit the Conservative Party in January. Deficit spending of any kind is always unacceptable and compromises the long term viability and independence of a nation. Just because the USA and other western countries are content to drown in a sea of debt does not make it OK for Canada to follow suit.


MAL
said

How can the deficit be more? They haven't done a darned thing besides 5 weeks of EI. Oh yeah, bail out car companies that should be left to die. 6 months.. no stimulus, no help... bring on an election Iggy - it sure can't do any worse and at least a few thousand electioneers will be hired.


Kalynn
said

I have to say that maybe each individual person should be responsible for THIER OWN pensions and stop wanting everyone else to deal with the loss. Everyone is in the same boat, all of the pensions and RRSPs went down. Why do I (taxpayer) have to pay for someone else? If a person was that concerned with not having enough money to retire, you should have invested more for YOUR future.


Reece
said

Interesting how it's always the liberals bringing in a balanced budget plus a surplus, and it takes only a few quarters for the inevitable to happen - a massive deficit. Let's not use the global financial crises as an excuse for this mess. This happens each and every time the Cons are in power. WHEN was the last time a conservative gov't reported a surplus?

This group knows how to tell the bad news in small bite sized pieces and I'm sure we are a long way from hearing the real truth.


NO to DEFICIT!
said

Ohhhh I have concern about this deficit... Despite that currenct ecomoncy woes is global and this deficit should've not happened in first place. That is one of main reason Tories is not doing well today.... Face it! Tories royally screwed Canadian this time even if Liberal made some mistakes but they didn't screwed us over. This deficit is getting too dangerous because our great country will head where USA is going at momently.

Look up how whole money system actually work.... Deficit does lead increase in Canada debt despite whether they say it does not!

It does! It is dangerous debt that could derail Canada easily as it nearly did to USA in WW2 and in Reagan era.



WL
said

if the government would stop taking over half of what you make you might be able to put some money away for retirement. By the time they are done and you have to raise a family there isnt much left. Leave us a little and we will take care of it ourselves.



James in Vancouver
said

Frank Buchan, I disagree with you in that the Conservatives chose to squander the surpluses they were left with by responsible governments before them. They chose to reduce the GST instead of reducing income taxes, they chose to tax income trusts and destroy Canadians' savings to the tune of $35B, they chose not to tell the truth on their budgeting and spending in Afghanistan...

They took us to the brink of deficit and now that revenues are way down for them, we are in a real mess. A responsible government would have been more measured, instead of pander to get and stay in power.

That said, make the changes to EI already, it's overdue or face the electorate. It's that simple.


Peter Rapsey
said

ANYTHING would be better than the present bunch. Get rid if them now.


Edwin from Toronto
said

More deficits added next year when GM ask for more bailout.

Keep our wallets open, all taxpayers.


Pete in BC
said

Something doesn't add up for me here. The finance minister stated that those that have been paying in for years need to get what they are entitled...fair enough. By my calculation, 420 hours based on a 35 hour work week is just 12 weeks. Would that not mean those who have been paying in for years would qualify.

It seems to me the issue is with the other end of the scale which is limited time in jobs. These folks are the ones that don't qualify and end up on welfare/income assistance roles.

There is no question that the feds should look at extending the number of weeks that folks are eligible to receive EI, to assist Canadians to get through this.

Those short on weeks to qualify for EI should go through the welfare system and most provinces have some expected to work regulations that ensure folks do not stay on for longer than necessary.

This really isn't an issue of how many hours an unfortunate, previously gainfully employed person who has been the model citizen paying into EI for years has...it is about off-loading financial responsibility from the feds to the province or visa-versa.



WestofTheRockies
said

C'mon, you can't have it both ways.

You've got Duncan claiming 420 hrs. is too many and the TD guy supporting him saying it leaves those out "who have paid into the system for years without assistance just because of where they live".

Well if you paid in for years you qualify. 420 hrs is just over 11 weeks anyhow.

This is just a bunch of B.S. floated by the Liberals & their supporters.

And by the way to "IGGY buy a House" ....Why? As P.M. he gets one courtesy of the taxpayer, as he does now as leader of the opposition.

Just shows you how little some people commenting here really know about this country.

Kinda ironic how well this works for IGGY though isn't it? No strings, so when this gig is up he can just up and leave again. Leave your forwarding address though, Canada Pension will send your cheque to you wherever you are - no cost.

Out here we're not too interested in a new Liberal Gov. enacting legislation to shift our wealth to central Canada, or download even more Federal responsibilities to Provincial governments to "fix" the country or economy as they have always done in the past.




Joe
said

All the EI rule changes came in under 13 years of Liberal rule. I guess now the Liberals don't like their own rules. How typically Liberal!!!! Call an election. Giver Harper the majority he so deserves.


Denise
said

This is ridiculous! Is this country a democracy or is it a socialist country?? Enough with the "nanny state" garbage.....Some workers in Ontario are being given a dose of a harsh reality (translations: "the world is coming to an end") so obviously laws must be rewritten, people must be rescued from themselves and the entire country needs to take another giant leap towards Socialism??? Enough with the government expected to take care of everyone!!! The bailouts are so thoroughly skewing the market that they are creating an extended recession, loads of future debt and are hurting the viable, efficient industries and businesses that would ordinarily survive in order to ensure the continued existence of the inefficient, corrupt, unrealistic businesses that should be allowed to disappear.


Dave S Calgary
said

To all those Ontario residents that are again whining, you never said a word when it was Ontario getting all the federal monies so shut up. This is a stupid subject and anyone that thinks 360 hrs is too much time to have to work, try a life time. Liberals are as they have always been HACKS


Mel Blake
said

I don't understand why people should expect the government to guarantee them income. They should simply eliminate mandatory retirement and allow everyone to work as long as they want or are able. If they can't work, then the disability programs kick just like everyone else, regardless of age. If someone can save money and can stop working, then good for them; but it is certainly not a "right".

People took a risk in private pension plans in the hope to live better after they stopped working. They lost the gamble and now will have to work a few more years before they retire or else not have as much money when they do retire. Its not pretty, but that's the capitalist system - risk and reward.


Matt
said

EI isn't an insurance plan.
It's a wealth transfer plan.

Insurance follows the following.
Rate=Benefit * Chance of Claim + Profit

EI charges a fixed rate
But in areas likely to have a claim there is a shorter minimum payment and higher benefit.

EI is just a scam to transfer more money to poor areas. Not a problem if you believe in wealth transfer, but then don't pretend it's insurance.


Jeanne B.C.
said

As one of the people who have paid into the EI for over 30 years and CAN NOT collect because I don't work enough hours in a year and I don't think we need the expense of another election just so that we can give the bullies a chnace to get in. I am sorry but the Liberals are really making enemies with the voters if they keep up with this playground bulling


Take Take Take
said

So, when the market recovers can the Government ask Canadians for the money they have given to shore up pensions back?!

Investments of any type, including your beloved pensions, come with some level of risk. Why do people always go looking for hand outs when times are tough! These are the same people who bought over-sized TV's when their savings were at their peak.

Where's the logic?


Ryan - Regina
said

420 hours is only 10.5 weeks of work (2 and a half months). That isn't a very long to time to work to qualify for EI.


Ethan
said

Right on Alysha, your comments sum it up exactly.

These Liberal lovers want us to be taxed to death again, I like the way things are being conducted. I have empathy for anyone unemployed, but the opposition parties want the Cons. to change things as Canada's status changes. (the man and the donkey syndrome) can't please everyone! The Liberals would not be buging on EI if they were in power either!


Lucky_Eddie
said

What gets me is how the Liberals continue to tell lies over and over until people eventually believe them to be true. For example, the last full year Flaherty was Ontario finance minister we had a small surplus (according to Greg Sorbara, the next finance minister). Then the Liberals manufactured a phony deficit to justify their massive tax grab. It was phony because it was a mid-year snapshot, which somehow assumed that all the revenues that typically come later (federal transfers, higher sales tax money from holiday buying, etc.) would be zero. But they simply proclaimed a deficit and pretended to be surprised, despite having said in the campaign they were expecting one. And even then it was half of what Bob Rae gave us each year. Yet even Cons supporters have become sucked in to this myth.


Molly
said

The NDP's Layton accused the prime minister on the weekend of showing old Reform Party attitudes and "blaming the victim" by suggesting EI benefits are generous and people are looking to exploit the system."

Unfortunately, Mr. Layton, there are many, many people out there who can and do exploit the system. That is a fact, and it needs to be fixed.

You should take a moment to read the comments on this site. You will find many from hard-working men and women who have paid into E.I. for many years, only to be turned away when they actually are in need of it's benefits. This is a joke and should be one of the first issues that needs to be addressed.

If you talk to the people you will also find that there are way too many "workers" who have, in fact, become very proficient at exploiting the system. They work the minimum number of weeks required and then collect E.I. for the balance of the year. These people do exist, Mr. Layton. They are not figments of anyones imagination. The tragedy is that they rob the people who genuinely do need UI benefits. This needs to be fixed.

I have been fortunate enough not to collect EI. However, it is a very important program and one that I am proud to support. I only ask that our elected leaders ensure that it is not being abused by seasonal workers and that the benefits are available to those who really need them. I find it hard to believe that many Canadians are going to argue with that.


Joe Smallwood from St Johns
said

For Paul in Vancouver the only people that will be getting to their feet will be AD agencies and friends of the Liberals, in case you forgot what the impetus was for the Canadian electorate to remove them from office in the first place. When are we going to see a real live IGGGY created policy platform instead of critical rhetoric? Hopefully before an election. At least Dion had a platform.


Larry I Ontario
said

As an Ontario resident I for one do not think the minister speaks on our behalf in a federal matter. There for sure should be an election as once again Harper shows he is only for big buisness and could not care less about the rest of us. We need action right now on EI and not political games. These are real issues about real people!


Kevin in Toronto
said

YA From Toronto-

The Liberal's manufactured a deficit when coming into power in Ontario.

They cancelled the planned sale of provincial assets and then claimed there was a deficit.

Flaherty didn't bankrupt anything.


realistic Natty,ON
said

Single biggest problem with EI is Federal Govt raiding it periodically for Tens of Billions to off-set Overspending, so much so that Harper described EI as Govt Money.
Want ads confirm that Alberta has an abundance of Vacancies which locals consider below-their-dignity. Employers are actually Importing willing-workers to fill said vacancies.
Other than Chronic-Seasonal there should be One Qualifying Standard for All, afterall It Is a Workers Fund.


Layton in Monctoni Misinformed
said

It amazes me hom many people on here don't know what they are talking about, including Dwight Duncan. When the Liberal's put the current qualifying rules in place, unemployment was at 10%. It stayed near that amount for 3 years after. The unemployment rate was higher in the early 2000's than it is now. And I never once heard a Liberal say those same rules were unfair then.


TRUE TO CANADA, from Sask.
said

I think that those who are throwing stones at any federeal party blaming them for the mass unemployment, mass deficits, mass bankruptcies, should look at the fact these are WORLD WIDE!!!

NOT JUST IN CANADA!!!

By the way the headline to this story was "Election over EI unnecessary, Ont. minister says" Not "who is doing what wrong"

It is time for stability even if we don't like the current govenment. It is high time the ELECTED GOVERNMENT be ALLOWED to govern this country instead of constantly having to ward off coups!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



wthegreat
said

Some portion of EI contribution should be rebated to those people who keeps on contributing but seldom or never collect themselves


JGW
said

I really love Jim from Ottawa's comment. “I don't see what is wrong with the EI system the way it is regardless of whether or not there is a recession. I think everyone should just forget about it and focus on more important things." Clearly his employment has not been affected! Anyhow this is most certainly an issue to take to the polls. It affects over 350,000 Canadians and clearly there is a difference of opinion in parliament, so much so that parliament has become dysfunctional on an issue extremely prevalent to the economic conditions we are presently facing. EI reform is badly needed. The piecemeal approach is simply not cutting it anymore. It is simply unfair.


R/H Ontario
said

Quite a few years ago, maybe 25 or so, I became unemployed! Things were tough and jobs were scarce, needless to say I applied for UI, as it was then. No jobs were to be found in my field of work and the AD in the newspaper was advertising 'RETRAINING for THE UNEMPLOYED'! I naturally asked for more info and a chance to re-train. I was trained in the UK as a Carpenter so no training expenses were incurred by the Canadian Government or taxpayer in ANYWAY! My application was TURNED down since I had already had a Trade! I was shocked, angry, dumbfounded at the response from the UI Person in charge of my application! Hopefully things have changed by now but I still think that the 'waiting period and length of employment' prior to a claim should NOT BE MESSED AROUND WITH. The Liberals screwed it up before let's not let them screw it up again. Almost all the people losing their jobs right now have worked at full time jobs therefore are elligible for EI at the going rates and should be able to afford the waiting period. Too many, as mentioned in some of the comments here, are just working a short time in order to claim EI for a long time. Plus many DO NOT TRY TO FIND WORK UNTIL EI ALMOST RUNS OUT!. No changes Mr Ignatieff and if you and your cohorts trigger an Election, you will be the losers, AGAIN!


We Need Action
said

Something does have to be done about the EI system that Chretien screwed up.

Ontario and Alberta have traditionally always gotten the short end of the stick in this country adn it is time that the Feds started to realize that they have to start treating these provinces a little more fairly.

After all, without Alberta and Ontario's tax money going to Ottawa, there wouldn't be that much money in the Feds coffers.


StopLyingToMe
said

The Liberals gutted the EI system, raising contributions, and qualifying times while lowering benefits. And so the normal 6 to 7 percent of unemployed Canadians have suffered from the Liberal's lack of compassion for a long time. Now unemployment is up to 8 or 9 percent. Are these new 2 or 3 percent unemployed more worthy of benefits and lower qualifying times than the chronic 6 to 7 percent unemployed? Who is fooled by this two faced Liberal position. It's like their position on the Stimulus Package. They want the Conservatives to provide a larger stimulus without running a deficit. Who are these people who get fooled by this? Are most of them in Toronto where most of the Liberal seats are?


S in Sask
said

Maybe we should vote for the Libertarian Party, and quit beating the same dead horse.


Lorne
said

I agree that EI reform is not an election issue.
However, the Government's stimulus to GM to cover the pension shortfall is!!!!
The workers' pension benefits were paid by GM, along with other perks.
The workers do not appear to have contributed to the pension plan and all benefits were over and above their hourly salary. These benefits appear to have been incorporated into the contract.
If this is not an election issue, then what is?


Mike - Toronto
said

Layton in Moncton you are completely wrong in your statement. The current rules in place were made when the Liberals were in Power and the unemployment rate was just under 10%. We are not even at yhat rate of unemployment now. Get your facts straight. This uproar is solely so the liberals can buy votes with our money once again. Seems the liberal party has learned nothing in opposition. They still want to buy votes with our money.


Hard worker
said

There are already enough people abusing EI! Not all but lot's. Work till you get enough hours then go on holidays for the summer and collect EI or go snow boarding all winter on EI! What ever happened to rewarding those who work hard? Not rewarding the lazy.
Go back home to your greedy cocky country men IGGY!


malingerer
said

"Jim in Ottawa says... I don't see what is wrong with the EI system the way it is regardless of whether or not there is a recession.."

Wait until you've been out of work for 7 months, having applied for hundred of jobs you are qualified for and many others you are over qualified for.." I've got the degree, 15 years of experience (and excelling at each position), and it's all quantifiable.. yet no new job yet..

And on top of it all London Life has placed a moratorium on my real estate RSP fund (meaning I can't take any out). No help from the gov't when dealing with big corporations.

Thank goodness we sold our house 4 months ago, otherwise we would be screwed.


MRC in Ontario.
said

Requiring someone to work 460hrs is unreasonable? What?! That's 460hr/(37.5hr/week) = 12.3 weeks! THAT'S LESS THAN A QUARTER OF A YEAR & IT'S CONSIDERED UNREASONABLE BY SOME OF OUR POLITICIANS?!?! If you have a part-time job, then it's a half year of work (for those who needed that).

These politicians need to get a real job from time to time. There's absolutely nothing wrong with requiring an individual to prove that they are competent enough to hold a job for a few months before they qualify for unemployment assistance.

Hey Canadians, grow some.

Here's the next logical question that'll likely stir some feathers... Is Canada overpopulated & is our economic/employment system sustainable ever since real work has been sent overseas & now the automobile sector (that isn't home-grown) is collapsing??


Pip
said

"Minister Flaherty said pensions will be a major part of the discussion and agreed with Duncan that the issue needs a national approach, even though only 10 per cent of private pensions are regulated by the federal government"

As pointed out by a previous poster, the specter of CAW pensions is behind all this. As far as I am concerned, if a pension plan exists, both parties - employer and employee - should be obliged to pay into the plan at all times. At NO time should a plan exist where the employee pays nothing. It is NOT the duty of the empoyer to mollycoddle the worker, just to supply employment, a reasonable wage and such benefits as may be fairly negotiated; a pension plan totally funded by the employer is not, in my opinion a fairly negotiated benefit.

It is time for all Canadians to realize this, and become responsible for their own savings for retirement, over and above company pensions and CPP. The means - RRSP's - have been there for decades.

And now, it is being proposed that the taxpayer should bail out those who were improvident, both in their bargaining and in their lack of personal preparedness. Why should the average joe, non-unionized, saving like crazy for their own retirement, have pay higher taxes and CPP simply to bail out those whose sole aim - in the case of the CAW - was to "stick it to GM" (or Ford, or Chrysler) just to feed their sense of entitlement?

Enough, already.


Pete, Burlington
said

To Dave,

I absolutely agree... Ignatieff is a complete phoney who is in favour of everything until he sees how many votes it will cost him when he is then against it. We all need to accept that this guy is not to Canada and is here only to have a play at running a country. If he fails, he will immediately disapear south of the border and reclaim America as his home.



Dave in Whitby
said

If the Liberals try to force a Summer Election they would have a low turn out now and we will have another MINORITY goverment for sure . The EI issue is not a CONFIDENCE issue to bring down the goverment , when we just had an Election about 8 month's ago .


James Durning
said

I've talked to many people in my company who were laid off and many of them were going to take EI benefits for as long as they could, waiting to find a job only near the end of EI. We should be providing more incentive to work, not to not work. Changing the rules constantly to adjust for the mob's mood at the time is a recipe for long term disaster.


YA from Toronto ON
said

With Mr. Flaherty I expect nothing. He left my province, Ontario, from a giant to an ant while he was a Finance minister. What do you think he is going to do to Canada!

Our PM knowing that Mr. Flaherty bankrupted Ontario into massive deficit promoted him to Federal Finance Minister. Talk about logical and responsible actions.

There is no hope in our current federally elected politicians. I support election and change. This is what is needed and that is what we deserve. Nothing less than that is acceptable.

Has the Toronto municipal workers increased their pay yet? …



Maureen
said

The time required to collect EI, even at the high end which amounts to about 6 months of work - full time. Given that the Canadian economy was running on high for a very long time, the only people who will have problems collecting EI are those who were working part-time (maybe by their own choice) or who have spotty work experience (maybe because of low skill levels, bad attitudes, lazy, whatever). People working in industrial sectors, and who are now being laid off, were likely working full time plus overtime. I really don't think they will have problems collecting EI under the current rules. For those others, EI is not going to help them - they need to be more engaged in the labour market - most likely upgrading their skills etc.


Alysha Ont
said

When will Iggy ever learn? We are in a recession. We do not need and cannot afford another election. The Liberals implemented the EI rules when they were in power. The Liberals wanted a costly stimulus package and got it on the threat of overthrowing the Gov't and now Iggy is blaming Harper for such a high deficit.
Harper and the Cons are doing a fine job and are trying to hold the reins ! Liberals are spenders and lousy policy makers but don't take responsibility for their actions but blame the Conservatives for everything.
Wouldn't it be nice if we had mature people in leadership positions in our country instead of ones who are always bickering, disagreeing or messing with each other.
Only in Canada they say !


Pete, Burlington
said

All politicians understand is bigger and bigger government with higher taxes and expansion of social programs. We cannot continue to expand everything (health care, school funding, pensions, EI, training for immigrants....the list goes on and on) without ultimately driving ourselves off a cliff. The UK tried this under Tony Blair/Gordon Brown and after many years of expansionism and continual tax hikes, the UK is now being down graded by S & P and runs the serious risk of becoming a third world banana republic due to a debt load that investors are no longer able to believe in a being viable. Is that what we want for Canada? We all need to take a lead from John Galt(Ayn Rand - Atlas Shrugged), before the politicians ruin everything with the ongoing redistribution of wealth and expansion of so called social spending.


Layton in Moncton
said

There is no question that EI reform is needed, but I (and I am a Liberal) don't feel we should go to the polls for it. The current government needs to realize that the rules were put in place when the world economy was on fire and Canada was at the top of the heap. The conditions on the ground HAVE changed, the the government cannot recognize that fact is further evidence on their inability to govern. Not surprising consider Harper and Flaherty were in denial that a WORLDWIDE economic melt down would affect Canada in the first place. I imagine once they finish personally attacking Mr. Ignatieff they'll try and sell themselves as economic and environmental stewards or something.


Angus McIntosh
said

So little time needed to qualify.

Better up the number of hours to at least 1000 hour before you can qualify for unemployement insurance. This will get those who find a job for a few weeks just so they can get unemployment insurance for about a year.

Unemployment insurance should be for those whopay into it for more then a few hours.


freeze meister
said

Let's just make it more fare for Ontarians and call it a day. I prefer the Conservatives who are much better at running things than the corny Libs.
The CAW doesn't deserve a dime of taxpayer money. Why do we continue to throw money at the uneducated and then tax the hell out of the educated. We're on our way to 3rd world status.


DaveEast
said

Is there anybody is this room who believes that Iggy is not slavering to be the Head Honcho? Do any of you doubt the Federal Liberals will do their fake outrage bit and find a way to throw us into another useless election?




Mike
said

Harper and the Conservatives think they are entitled to Govern as a majority Government when they do not have one and will never get one. Harper and crew...shut the hell up nobody wants to hear from you idiots.




Matt
said

"Duncan is asking Ottawa to take the lead role over whether Ottawa and the provinces should take steps to help Canadians bolster their retirement savings"

How about stop taking half my paycheck away in taxes?
If I had my own money I could do something, rather than waste billions on stuff that I don't want to spend my money on.


Paul in Vancouver
said

The Cons have played house long enough! Time to let the Liberals back in to clean up the mess.....AGAIN! after a brief flirtation with conservatism (or is that reformism, alliancism). Whatever. Let's put this country back on its feet.


Dan from Northern Ont
said

Couldn't agree with you more Dave. EI is meant for those who've worked semi stable jobs. Not for those that take a 2 month contract and ride EI for a year. It's EI, not welfare.


Pete, Burlington
said

Here we go again with Ontario politicians whining about needing more money. McGuinty and his bunch of yahoos have squandered billions of dollars on useless programs whilst raising taxes right, left and centre. I feel sorry for those who have lost jobs and those whose pensions are underfunded, but I am sorry to say that as a taxpayer I for one have had enough of people saying that the govenment should add funding for this and that to fix the injustice.

It all sounds great, but somebody has to pay for it! That typically means taxpayers like me or our future generations. I have been prudent and have contributed every month for the past 20+ years to my retirement without anything from any employer. When I retire, I don't expect anything from anyone as I think the government pension will be bankrupt long before I retire, so please explain why any politician thinks that I should pay higher taxes to contributre to someone elses retirement?

As for EI, plain and simply, the taxpayers of Canada already suffer too high a burden for our social programs and to increase that burden is unjustifiable. There are still jobs to be found in Canada, it just means you need to move to find them, but that is what this country was founded on - a migratory populus that went where there was work. Have we really become so dependant upon our state to look after us by providing EI etc that we have lost the drive to fend for ourselves by doing whaterver it takes to find work?


ME
said

460 hours is- 11 1/2 -40 hour weeks or 3 months.

Just how many of the Ontario unemployed worked less than that. The jobs Ontario lost were not seasonal but full time jobs.

I just wonder how mant more would qualify if it were dropped to 9 weeks.

Seems to me that is a tempest in a teapot scared up by the Ontario Liberals.

What the Federal Government should be doing though is looking at pensions and pension income. These are the people who are going to be hurting and not spending to boost the economy


Doug BC
said

Changes to EI would be a lot easier if there weren't so many people so willing to abuse whatever requirements are put in place.
I would suggest that the Conservatives should not be entirely closed minded on this issue.But I would also suggest that Liberals quit trying to legislate more social benefits,which ALWAYS mean more taxes.
This recession will come to an end at some point.I do not think another program of entitlements,and the taxes that come with it,should be left for taxpayers to deal with forever.
That said,if there are ways to offer temporary help to those now losing their jobs,we should give them due consideration.But this help must not relieve people of the responsibility they have to actually work for as much of their standard of living as those who pay the taxes to support government help via social programs.
The government,after all is said and done,has no money of it's own.It can only give to one citizen the money it has confiscated from another citizen.And we all know there are far to many people willing to live their whole lives on the backs of their neighbours.
Finding the right balance is a tricky,and often a very subjective judgement.But to have yet another election would be completely counter productive.These MP's MUST get over their lust for power and get on with the affairs of the nation.Just changing the faces in our Parliament will do nothing to make these issues any less contentious,or provide Ottawa with any more money to re-distribute.



Adam in Ottawa
said

I wonder if these Conservative Quiz Kids have yet to realise that in order to get retrained under EI you first have to qualify for EI. Also, the cons seem to think that if they lightened the requirements that EI would turn into another form of welfare. Ridiculous! It should be easier for all people in any province to qualify for benefits if they need temporary help due to job loss.


Bubba-louie
said

We are all Canadians but there are limits to our generosity. The current limitation of working 460 hours to qualify for EI is fair. I believe the Liberals want it reduced to 360 hours and then one is able to collect a year's worth of benefits. Are you kidding me? Make them a Senator instead! EI and welfare should never be an incentive to get people to seek short term jobs for long term (albeit minimal) benefits. We need to motivate EMPLOYERS to hire employees not to motivate workers to get on EI/welfare. Another problem with this country is that few qualified workers want to relocate to the jobs. They want the jobs to come to them and unfortunately that isn't likely to occur in this day and age.



Glenn
said

Seriously, is there any party that's half decent to vote for.



IGGY buy a house...you will need it!
said

Flaherty is frankly disconnected with reality. It is time that Canada does what it always did in the past when we were faced with economic challenges. Put the expert in place and let them do their job. That means, lets go to election, toss out the CONS and get the LIBS in power.

That formula always worked in the past and since we have nothing better to propose, we should stick with what works!

Welcome HOME IGGY!!!


Gord. Robson, Nova Scotia
said

I think Finance Minister Flaherty is doing a GREAT job!

He and his Provincial counterparts working together is what we all want to see, co-operation.

It is always better to meet together in one room eye to eye.

Let us give credit to our elected government who are doing just that, governing.


Red X
said

The Harper Gov't should meet them half way at 400 hours OR prorate the EI based on the contribution.

As for the pensions, starting April 2011; baby boomers will reach retirement age in droves. Raising the age is a solution.

Lastly, Flaherty has mismanaged the Cdn budget and TFSAs mean less consumer spending so the Gov't doesn't even collect the 5% GST...despite that reduction.


Mark
said

Again with respect to CAW-let us be clear here. These folks contributed not a penny to their own pensions but had every opportunity with their rich union wages to make the full committment possible to their RRSP's. I don't have a union baragaining with a gun to anyone's head for me-who's going to bail out MY RRSP?

I realize that this article is not about the CAW specifically but let us be clear on the elephant in the room.

Listen to me government-don't you dare bail out the plus $100K screwdriver with the grade 10 education on my tax dollar!!!!!!


Jim in Ottawa
said

I don't see what is wrong with the EI system the way it is regardless of whether or not there is a recession. I think everyone should just forget about it and focus on more important things.


York
said

In 1992, the federal government passed legislation making it mandatory for private pension plans to be 100% funded. Until that time most private pension plans depended on income from younger participants to fund those who had already retired. In the years since 1992, I have lost 40% of the value of my trades pension as a result of this legislation. So I am opposed to using my tax dollars to beef up CAW pensions, because I will never recover from the loss to my own.


Independently Minded
said

@Frank Buchan
Well Frank the Cons have always been the first to throw stones...

I am just wondering why this meeting couldn't be done via "Conference Call" or "Web Meeting"?

Is it really necessary for Canadian tax payers to pay to fly all these finance ministers to the Meech Lake resort, feed them, house them, etc... for photo ops???

Doesn't sound fiscally responsible during a recession to me...


VernV
said

This is the first step to bail out the Quebec Pension Plan. Then Duceppe will complain that 1) the gov't of Canada is infringing on Quebec sovereignty by funding a Quebec initiative, and 2) not enough funding was provided.


Frank Buchan (Vauxhall, Alberta by way of Ontario)
said

It is disconcerting to have politicians (largely useless and clueless) sitting down to spend our money for the pure purpose of gaining political traction. Even when well-intentioned, they make a mess of the simplest processes. And an opening remark from Carney? What will he say, "Bank policy and the tools we have used for decades are failing, since we have no authority to ensure profit-taking doesn't happen. Now spend money we don't have!" It's like the ineffectual leading the irresponsible.

I imagine the Conservative bashing will now begin, despite the fact this has zero to do with whichever party is in the driver's seat.


Ray in Sask
said

Really? a strong committment? I wonder why. Could it be because we are in a recessionary period? quit wasting air time Flaherty and just get to work.


Cnd Girl
said

Do they really have a choice but get along and be productive?


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Politics Stories

Quebec student strikes, tuition fees, Montreal, Quebec

Quebec students, government to resume talks Monday

More   27 Comments 27    4 Video(s) 4

Newfoundland and Labrador Premier Kathy Dunderdale receives applause from party members as the House of Assembly opens in St. John's on Monday, March 5, 2012. (Paul Daly /  THE CANADIAN PRESS)

EI changes unfair to N.L., Dunderdale says

More   20 Comments 20    1 Video(s) 1

In this Monday, Sept. 19, 2011 file photo, Fereidoun Abbasi Davani speaks during a news conference at the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna, Austria. (AP Photo/Ronald Zak)

Iran says no reason to halt 20 per cent enrichment

More   8 Comments 8  

Most Talked about Stories

It is about time - as a grandparent I have watched our kids (who were allowed to fail although I do remember some nagging on our part) learn, I have watched our children now micro-manage their children. A big part of it is the fact that there are predators out there and an extreme reluctance on the parents part to alllow freedom that might result in the children becoming victims.

Harvey

Parents must learn to stop meddling, author urges