Politics -
News Sections
Deficit to be 'substantially more' than projected
CTV News Video
|
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Tue. May. 26 2009 8:56 AM ET
Finance Minister Jim Flaherty said Monday the federal deficit will be "substantially more" than the government projected in January's 2009-2010 budget.
The initial deficit forecast was $34 billion. But Flaherty said that government revenues have been hit harder by the recession than expected.
"We will run a larger deficit in this year than anticipated in January, and I'll report further on that when the government reports to the people of Canada and Parliament in June with our update," he said.
The government has also forecast a $30-billion deficit for 2010-2011, and more deficits in the following three years.
Flaherty's comments came after a meeting with his provincial counterparts in Chelsea, Que., as the provinces push for more money from Ottawa to help them cope with the financial downturn.
The ministers decided to form a study group that will examine Canada's private pension plan system. Flaherty's parliamentary secretary, Ted Menzies, will oversee the group.
Ontario Finance Minister Dwight Duncan and other provincial ministers had called on the federal government to focus on the lack of retirement savings among Canadians, as the recession erodes people's bank accounts.
"We need to look at the question of pension adequacy," Duncan told CTV's Power Play. "In Ontario -- and I think the number is comparable across the country -- only about 30 per cent of people have a private pension."
He also said many of those with pension plans are not maximizing their savings with the various tax incentives, and that increasing longevity is also having an impact.
"We're living longer," he said. "The costs associated with getting older, like heavier medical needs and heavier long-term care needs, mean that our costs are going to be higher than I think many of us are anticipating."
Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty said on Monday he personally asked Prime Minister Stephen Harper to host a national summit to develop polices that will maintain a decent retirement income for seniors.
McGuinty rejected a call from Ontario's New Democrats on Monday to establish a provincial pension plan for the two-thirds of people who don't have a workplace pension. But he told the legislature if the federal government fails to act, it's something he would consider.
McGuinty said that most premiers agree the issue needs to be dealt with at the national level even though British Columbia and Alberta mulled over the possibility of setting up their own provincial plans.
Demands for Ottawa to act have been increasing as private pension schemes falter and stocks suffer from the recession.
TD Chief Economist Don Drummond said many Canadians have been left with inadequate amounts of savings in their Registered Retirement Savings Plans.
He said the Canadian Pension Plan only replaces about a quarter of one's earnings after retirement and as the baby boomers begin to retire, the system will be put under considerable stress.
"There is an onus on the public policy authorities either to make other alternative plans available voluntarily or perhaps even make it compulsory," he told CTV Newsnet.
Although the Conservatives have introduced incentives for Canadians to save money such as tax-free savings accounts, they have been reluctant to shore up pension savings on a broad scale.
Rather, the government has so far directed its efforts to study how to preserve the small amount of workplace pension plans regulated by Ottawa.
Flaherty said pensions will be a major part of the discussion and agreed with Duncan that the issue needs a national approach, even though only 10 per cent of private pensions are regulated by the federal government
"We're all Canadians, we're all in this together," he said Monday.
Employment insurance
Earlier Monday, Duncan said that Canada should not enter into an election at this time over the contentious issue of reforming employment insurance.
Despite Ontario's criticism of the current EI system, which leaves Ontarians facing tougher eligibility requirements than other Canadians, Duncan said he does not favour an election.
"We prefer not to see an election right now, we prefer to see real change to provide fairness for the unemployed," he said on his way into a meeting with the Jim Flaherty and other provincial finance ministers.
Hit with massive layoffs in the auto sector, Ontarians still need 420 hours of work to qualify for EI, which Duncan said is too many.
"The rules that are in place now were set a time when the economy was very different," he added.
Drummond told CTV Newsnet the EI system is "badly broken," adding that regional differentiations for eligibility are at the heart of the problem.
He said it's harder for workers to qualify for EI in areas with lower unemployment because they are required to have worked more hours to be eligible.
Still, it's difficult to find jobs in these areas, he said, and that's leaving many Canadians who have paid into the system for years without assistance just because of where they live.
Human Resources Minister Diane Finley said Monday that unemployed Canadians would be better served by job training than revamping the EI system.
"Going into this recession, unlike previous ones, we had significant skills shortages right across the country in a wide range of professions," she told Power Play. "We need to encourage people to get those skills for the jobs of the future."
With files from The Canadian Press
User Tools
Related Stories
Most Popular
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
It is about time - as a grandparent I have watched our kids (who were allowed to fail although I do remember some nagging on our part) learn, I have watched our children now micro-manage their children. A big part of it is the fact that there are predators out there and an extreme reluctance on the parents part to alllow freedom that might result in the children becoming victims.
Email
Comments are now closed for this story
Nancy: NDP to Replace Liberals as Official Opposit
said
The NDP is looking good to relpace the Liberals as the official opposition party.
Marg MM
said
You better enjoy the Tory times also, because if and when the Liberals get in power,we will ALL be in worse shape and our pockets will be picked dry. Be careful what you wish for.
Retired Soldier in Kingston, ON
said
Fast re-wind to the early 1970's when Pierre Elliot Trudeau decided to start the country on its downward spiral with constantly increasing budgets, and hand-outs to any special interest group! Result...the phenomenon of ever increasing deficits and political "spin" by Liberal MP's to support spending programmes at any cost!
And then we had Paul Martin, Liberal Finance Minister of the 1990's cutting 30,000 soldiers and raiding military budgets to the tune of tens of billions of dollars so the Liberals could lie to gullible voters and their media acolytes that they had... "tamed the deficit"!
Sure...but at what expense to the country, its most vulnerable and its global foreign policy?
Andrea in Ottawa
said
farther west of the Rockies
said
Harper is a big boy, nobody forced him to do anything he didn't want to do, blaming a potential coalition for this deficit is crazy.
Harper could of called their bluff & called an election to get this so called majority you Con lovers like to say will happen, but the fact is we were already in deficit when Harper called the election in October( remember the steady as she goes & we're gonna have a small surplus for 2009)
all lies from the same Finance minister who kept a multi million dollar deficit from the Ontario tax payers during an election when he was then their finance minister. All you Harper lovers better enjoy the Tory times now because I guarentee you they will come to an end by December'09 ( unless Harper stalls parliment and any confidence votes as was reported here last week so he can be at the 2010 winter Oylmpics in Vancouver....HMMM this guy really is a piece of work.
Jackie Barrett
said
IOUSA is a documentary about America's debt crisis, and also its poor economic performance including savings deficits, budget deficits, negative current account, and a leadership deficit similar to George W. Bush and Stephen Harper.
The way Harper and Flaherty are going, it won't be long until Canada joins Great Britain and USA as most indebted nations.
Away with the neo-cons, bring in the New Democrats and Liberals.
Farther west of the Rockies..
said
Get your facts straight before you start spewing your right wing narrow minded nonesence..This Deficit has nothing to do with the Liberal party , This is currently going to become the biggest deficit in CANADIAN HISTORY !! by a sitting Canadian Government & Yes it's bigger than the one The Trudeau Liberals had back in the 70's . All You Western con supporters gotta get past this whole Trudeau's the reason for our whooohs, the guy is dead & has not been Prime Minister since 1984 & for the 10 years after he left we had a Conservative Government in power who made the deficit ever bigger. It's now 2009 Time to get over all this anti Trudeau crap... all the negativaty & venom that you hold is not healthy for anyone.
Jay, Ottawa
said
Mark is right. All this bail out money devalues our currency. It says, "here, this stuff is useless - take a pile of it".
Walter (Winnipeg)
said
Jay, Ottawa
said
First they didn't see a recession as even possible, now they can't forecast with any reliability.
His incompetence is going to cost us all through the devaluation of our currency in the long term.
Joe Canada
said
No rational Canadian would ever support these outright liars and abject failures when it comes to managing our economy.
Jay-TO
said
Priorities please. Or give someone else a chance to lead or another poltical party.
Herb
said
tired of political garbage
said
retdhairy
said
Disappointed Canadian
said
Marg MM
said
Are you old enough to know how the Liberals balanced their budgets? Off-loading to provinces, cutting to the bare minimum the armed forces, raiding the EI fund to the tune of millions. These are just a few of the things they have done in the past.They like to take, take,take, but never want to give anything back to those that they took from.
As to the EI, 360 days is just too short of a time to work to be able to collect a year of EI. Most people that have recently lost jobs would have probably worked full time, so this is not an issue.
What we need is less government in our pockets, not more, which is what we would have with the Liberals.
Most of us are able and willing to work hard and are not whining and looking for handouts.
Frustrated
said
Skippy
said
Tax payers bailing out international corporations and some of the most powerful financial institutions on the planet and the taxpayers get the bill. BARF. this is anything but democratic.
PeaDoubleyew
said
World Bank says unemployment will get WORSE.
said
"If we do no take measures, there is a risk of a serious human and social crisis with very serious political implications," Robert Zoellick said.
He pointed to Eastern Europe, which faces the "tricky situation" of fast-shrinking economies and protests.
Mr Zoellick suggested governments should start preparing for high levels of unemployment.
So U Hate Autoworkers
said
lp4
said
Call the federal election NOW.
said
WestofTheRockies
said
Please tell us how the Liberals, (creator's of Canada's debt) would hve managed this recession without bringing in deficit budgets? tell the world it's over? or........
More broken promises like the last times, like enact a new NEP which they didn't say they would do, boost the gas tax 10 cents/ltr which they said they wouldn't but did, renegotiate NAFTA which they said they would but didn't or eliminate the GST for example which they said they would do but didn't? All broken promises or would they manage by downloading the cost of Federal programmes to the Provinces which they did last time when they couldn't fufill their mandate??
They didn't balance anything they just moved the debt around.
Sure you can trust those Liberals.
Which shell is the pea under Reece.
ndper
said
get the gst up to 20% where it should be.
Tim from Calgary
said
Tim in Edmonton
said
WELFARE BUM
said
M.Cousineau
said
More of the same now at the federal level with Harper.
We certainly do not need more of the same.
Forecast to satisfy politic not the tax payers.Then latter says sorry, we made a mistake. The Oposition made us do that mistake.
We need to change this Cons goverment the sooner the better.
Johnnie Oil
said
the conservatives caved on thier base and ethics in fear of an election and we all want to be like Iggies best buddy - obama "let just print more" and it's bushes fault. what a joke! no accountability for anyone or corporation, the whole system is a joke from village major to PM
Mary in Calgary
said
Do they even know how to save? Living in Alberta it shows how a once powerhouse economic province was shaken to the ground by our conservative premier in no time during the recession. Now these conservatives want to implement this to the rest of Canada!
Bring on an election! We'll show them!
gerald
said
only approx. 7% of the money allocated for these hard economic times has actually been spent (ctv news). The tories are coming out with this to counter the liberal initiative for improved EI. Don't be fooled by the rhetoric!
kate
said
Bob in Lewisporte
said
I LOVE UNIONS
said
Jim in Edmonton
said
JIM FLAHERTY
said
Mark From Sask
said
Madeleine
said
Think twice before you force another election
said
Lived outside of Canada 34 years (62-34) = 28 years in Canada.
19 years to age of adult and to vote (28-19) = 9 years.
Iggy has lived 9 years as a adult eligible to vote in Canada.
Isn't there a minimum requirement that should be established to become Prime Minister of a Country?
Maybe not, but I would say this man sure doesn't qualify for my vote, regardless of his Liberal platform (whatever that is these days)
David
said
MW in Thunder Bay
said
MAL
said
Kalynn
said
Reece
said
This group knows how to tell the bad news in small bite sized pieces and I'm sure we are a long way from hearing the real truth.
NO to DEFICIT!
said
Look up how whole money system actually work.... Deficit does lead increase in Canada debt despite whether they say it does not!
It does! It is dangerous debt that could derail Canada easily as it nearly did to USA in WW2 and in Reagan era.
WL
said
James in Vancouver
said
They took us to the brink of deficit and now that revenues are way down for them, we are in a real mess. A responsible government would have been more measured, instead of pander to get and stay in power.
That said, make the changes to EI already, it's overdue or face the electorate. It's that simple.
Peter Rapsey
said
Edwin from Toronto
said
Keep our wallets open, all taxpayers.
Pete in BC
said
It seems to me the issue is with the other end of the scale which is limited time in jobs. These folks are the ones that don't qualify and end up on welfare/income assistance roles.
There is no question that the feds should look at extending the number of weeks that folks are eligible to receive EI, to assist Canadians to get through this.
Those short on weeks to qualify for EI should go through the welfare system and most provinces have some expected to work regulations that ensure folks do not stay on for longer than necessary.
This really isn't an issue of how many hours an unfortunate, previously gainfully employed person who has been the model citizen paying into EI for years has...it is about off-loading financial responsibility from the feds to the province or visa-versa.
WestofTheRockies
said
You've got Duncan claiming 420 hrs. is too many and the TD guy supporting him saying it leaves those out "who have paid into the system for years without assistance just because of where they live".
Well if you paid in for years you qualify. 420 hrs is just over 11 weeks anyhow.
This is just a bunch of B.S. floated by the Liberals & their supporters.
And by the way to "IGGY buy a House" ....Why? As P.M. he gets one courtesy of the taxpayer, as he does now as leader of the opposition.
Just shows you how little some people commenting here really know about this country.
Kinda ironic how well this works for IGGY though isn't it? No strings, so when this gig is up he can just up and leave again. Leave your forwarding address though, Canada Pension will send your cheque to you wherever you are - no cost.
Out here we're not too interested in a new Liberal Gov. enacting legislation to shift our wealth to central Canada, or download even more Federal responsibilities to Provincial governments to "fix" the country or economy as they have always done in the past.
Joe
said
Denise
said
Dave S Calgary
said
Mel Blake
said
People took a risk in private pension plans in the hope to live better after they stopped working. They lost the gamble and now will have to work a few more years before they retire or else not have as much money when they do retire. Its not pretty, but that's the capitalist system - risk and reward.
Matt
said
It's a wealth transfer plan.
Insurance follows the following.
Rate=Benefit * Chance of Claim + Profit
EI charges a fixed rate
But in areas likely to have a claim there is a shorter minimum payment and higher benefit.
EI is just a scam to transfer more money to poor areas. Not a problem if you believe in wealth transfer, but then don't pretend it's insurance.
Jeanne B.C.
said
Take Take Take
said
Investments of any type, including your beloved pensions, come with some level of risk. Why do people always go looking for hand outs when times are tough! These are the same people who bought over-sized TV's when their savings were at their peak.
Where's the logic?
Ryan - Regina
said
Ethan
said
These Liberal lovers want us to be taxed to death again, I like the way things are being conducted. I have empathy for anyone unemployed, but the opposition parties want the Cons. to change things as Canada's status changes. (the man and the donkey syndrome) can't please everyone! The Liberals would not be buging on EI if they were in power either!
Lucky_Eddie
said
Molly
said
Unfortunately, Mr. Layton, there are many, many people out there who can and do exploit the system. That is a fact, and it needs to be fixed.
You should take a moment to read the comments on this site. You will find many from hard-working men and women who have paid into E.I. for many years, only to be turned away when they actually are in need of it's benefits. This is a joke and should be one of the first issues that needs to be addressed.
If you talk to the people you will also find that there are way too many "workers" who have, in fact, become very proficient at exploiting the system. They work the minimum number of weeks required and then collect E.I. for the balance of the year. These people do exist, Mr. Layton. They are not figments of anyones imagination. The tragedy is that they rob the people who genuinely do need UI benefits. This needs to be fixed.
I have been fortunate enough not to collect EI. However, it is a very important program and one that I am proud to support. I only ask that our elected leaders ensure that it is not being abused by seasonal workers and that the benefits are available to those who really need them. I find it hard to believe that many Canadians are going to argue with that.
Joe Smallwood from St Johns
said
Larry I Ontario
said
Kevin in Toronto
said
The Liberal's manufactured a deficit when coming into power in Ontario.
They cancelled the planned sale of provincial assets and then claimed there was a deficit.
Flaherty didn't bankrupt anything.
realistic Natty,ON
said
Want ads confirm that Alberta has an abundance of Vacancies which locals consider below-their-dignity. Employers are actually Importing willing-workers to fill said vacancies.
Other than Chronic-Seasonal there should be One Qualifying Standard for All, afterall It Is a Workers Fund.
Layton in Monctoni Misinformed
said
TRUE TO CANADA, from Sask.
said
NOT JUST IN CANADA!!!
By the way the headline to this story was "Election over EI unnecessary, Ont. minister says" Not "who is doing what wrong"
It is time for stability even if we don't like the current govenment. It is high time the ELECTED GOVERNMENT be ALLOWED to govern this country instead of constantly having to ward off coups!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
wthegreat
said
JGW
said
R/H Ontario
said
We Need Action
said
Ontario and Alberta have traditionally always gotten the short end of the stick in this country adn it is time that the Feds started to realize that they have to start treating these provinces a little more fairly.
After all, without Alberta and Ontario's tax money going to Ottawa, there wouldn't be that much money in the Feds coffers.
StopLyingToMe
said
S in Sask
said
Lorne
said
However, the Government's stimulus to GM to cover the pension shortfall is!!!!
The workers' pension benefits were paid by GM, along with other perks.
The workers do not appear to have contributed to the pension plan and all benefits were over and above their hourly salary. These benefits appear to have been incorporated into the contract.
If this is not an election issue, then what is?
Mike - Toronto
said
Hard worker
said
Go back home to your greedy cocky country men IGGY!
malingerer
said
Wait until you've been out of work for 7 months, having applied for hundred of jobs you are qualified for and many others you are over qualified for.." I've got the degree, 15 years of experience (and excelling at each position), and it's all quantifiable.. yet no new job yet..
And on top of it all London Life has placed a moratorium on my real estate RSP fund (meaning I can't take any out). No help from the gov't when dealing with big corporations.
Thank goodness we sold our house 4 months ago, otherwise we would be screwed.
MRC in Ontario.
said
These politicians need to get a real job from time to time. There's absolutely nothing wrong with requiring an individual to prove that they are competent enough to hold a job for a few months before they qualify for unemployment assistance.
Hey Canadians, grow some.
Here's the next logical question that'll likely stir some feathers... Is Canada overpopulated & is our economic/employment system sustainable ever since real work has been sent overseas & now the automobile sector (that isn't home-grown) is collapsing??
Pip
said
As pointed out by a previous poster, the specter of CAW pensions is behind all this. As far as I am concerned, if a pension plan exists, both parties - employer and employee - should be obliged to pay into the plan at all times. At NO time should a plan exist where the employee pays nothing. It is NOT the duty of the empoyer to mollycoddle the worker, just to supply employment, a reasonable wage and such benefits as may be fairly negotiated; a pension plan totally funded by the employer is not, in my opinion a fairly negotiated benefit.
It is time for all Canadians to realize this, and become responsible for their own savings for retirement, over and above company pensions and CPP. The means - RRSP's - have been there for decades.
And now, it is being proposed that the taxpayer should bail out those who were improvident, both in their bargaining and in their lack of personal preparedness. Why should the average joe, non-unionized, saving like crazy for their own retirement, have pay higher taxes and CPP simply to bail out those whose sole aim - in the case of the CAW - was to "stick it to GM" (or Ford, or Chrysler) just to feed their sense of entitlement?
Enough, already.
Pete, Burlington
said
I absolutely agree... Ignatieff is a complete phoney who is in favour of everything until he sees how many votes it will cost him when he is then against it. We all need to accept that this guy is not to Canada and is here only to have a play at running a country. If he fails, he will immediately disapear south of the border and reclaim America as his home.
Dave in Whitby
said
James Durning
said
YA from Toronto ON
said
Our PM knowing that Mr. Flaherty bankrupted Ontario into massive deficit promoted him to Federal Finance Minister. Talk about logical and responsible actions.
There is no hope in our current federally elected politicians. I support election and change. This is what is needed and that is what we deserve. Nothing less than that is acceptable.
Has the Toronto municipal workers increased their pay yet? …
Maureen
said
Alysha Ont
said
Harper and the Cons are doing a fine job and are trying to hold the reins ! Liberals are spenders and lousy policy makers but don't take responsibility for their actions but blame the Conservatives for everything.
Wouldn't it be nice if we had mature people in leadership positions in our country instead of ones who are always bickering, disagreeing or messing with each other.
Only in Canada they say !
Pete, Burlington
said
Layton in Moncton
said
Angus McIntosh
said
Better up the number of hours to at least 1000 hour before you can qualify for unemployement insurance. This will get those who find a job for a few weeks just so they can get unemployment insurance for about a year.
Unemployment insurance should be for those whopay into it for more then a few hours.
freeze meister
said
The CAW doesn't deserve a dime of taxpayer money. Why do we continue to throw money at the uneducated and then tax the hell out of the educated. We're on our way to 3rd world status.
DaveEast
said
Mike
said
Matt
said
How about stop taking half my paycheck away in taxes?
If I had my own money I could do something, rather than waste billions on stuff that I don't want to spend my money on.
Paul in Vancouver
said
Dan from Northern Ont
said
Pete, Burlington
said
It all sounds great, but somebody has to pay for it! That typically means taxpayers like me or our future generations. I have been prudent and have contributed every month for the past 20+ years to my retirement without anything from any employer. When I retire, I don't expect anything from anyone as I think the government pension will be bankrupt long before I retire, so please explain why any politician thinks that I should pay higher taxes to contributre to someone elses retirement?
As for EI, plain and simply, the taxpayers of Canada already suffer too high a burden for our social programs and to increase that burden is unjustifiable. There are still jobs to be found in Canada, it just means you need to move to find them, but that is what this country was founded on - a migratory populus that went where there was work. Have we really become so dependant upon our state to look after us by providing EI etc that we have lost the drive to fend for ourselves by doing whaterver it takes to find work?
ME
said
Just how many of the Ontario unemployed worked less than that. The jobs Ontario lost were not seasonal but full time jobs.
I just wonder how mant more would qualify if it were dropped to 9 weeks.
Seems to me that is a tempest in a teapot scared up by the Ontario Liberals.
What the Federal Government should be doing though is looking at pensions and pension income. These are the people who are going to be hurting and not spending to boost the economy
Doug BC
said
I would suggest that the Conservatives should not be entirely closed minded on this issue.But I would also suggest that Liberals quit trying to legislate more social benefits,which ALWAYS mean more taxes.
This recession will come to an end at some point.I do not think another program of entitlements,and the taxes that come with it,should be left for taxpayers to deal with forever.
That said,if there are ways to offer temporary help to those now losing their jobs,we should give them due consideration.But this help must not relieve people of the responsibility they have to actually work for as much of their standard of living as those who pay the taxes to support government help via social programs.
The government,after all is said and done,has no money of it's own.It can only give to one citizen the money it has confiscated from another citizen.And we all know there are far to many people willing to live their whole lives on the backs of their neighbours.
Finding the right balance is a tricky,and often a very subjective judgement.But to have yet another election would be completely counter productive.These MP's MUST get over their lust for power and get on with the affairs of the nation.Just changing the faces in our Parliament will do nothing to make these issues any less contentious,or provide Ottawa with any more money to re-distribute.
Adam in Ottawa
said
Bubba-louie
said
Glenn
said
IGGY buy a house...you will need it!
said
That formula always worked in the past and since we have nothing better to propose, we should stick with what works!
Welcome HOME IGGY!!!
Gord. Robson, Nova Scotia
said
He and his Provincial counterparts working together is what we all want to see, co-operation.
It is always better to meet together in one room eye to eye.
Let us give credit to our elected government who are doing just that, governing.
Red X
said
As for the pensions, starting April 2011; baby boomers will reach retirement age in droves. Raising the age is a solution.
Lastly, Flaherty has mismanaged the Cdn budget and TFSAs mean less consumer spending so the Gov't doesn't even collect the 5% GST...despite that reduction.
Mark
said
I realize that this article is not about the CAW specifically but let us be clear on the elephant in the room.
Listen to me government-don't you dare bail out the plus $100K screwdriver with the grade 10 education on my tax dollar!!!!!!
Jim in Ottawa
said
York
said
Independently Minded
said
Well Frank the Cons have always been the first to throw stones...
I am just wondering why this meeting couldn't be done via "Conference Call" or "Web Meeting"?
Is it really necessary for Canadian tax payers to pay to fly all these finance ministers to the Meech Lake resort, feed them, house them, etc... for photo ops???
Doesn't sound fiscally responsible during a recession to me...
VernV
said
Frank Buchan (Vauxhall, Alberta by way of Ontario)
said
I imagine the Conservative bashing will now begin, despite the fact this has zero to do with whichever party is in the driver's seat.
Ray in Sask
said
Cnd Girl
said