Politics -   

1
Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper and U.S. President Barack Obama are shown in recent file photos. The Prime Minister's Office says U.S. President Barack Obama will visit Canada Feb. 19. (THE CANADIAN PRESS/AP/CP)

Are Harper and Obama going to be buddies?

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV National News: Roger Smith on what to expect during the Obama visit to Ottawa
U.S. President Barack Obama will only be in Canada for seven hours during his visit on Thursday, which will be just enough time for Prime Minister Stephen Harper to discuss the recently passed stimulus package.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (71) Facebook   

Date: Sun. Feb. 15 2009 10:29 PM ET

U.S. presidents have visited Canada numerous times but few will arrive with the excitement stirred up by the 44th commander-in-chief, Barack Obama, when he visits Ottawa and Prime Minister Stephen Harper this Thursday.

But the irony is that Obama's first foreign trip as president is being billed as the political equivalent of a business lunch at Tim Hortons, with nary a bit of the pomp and circumstance that other foreign leaders have been treated with in Ottawa.

Unlike former presidents such as Franklin Roosevelt, Bill Clinton, John F. Kennedy or Dwight Eisenhower, Obama will not be putting his rhetorical skills to use in front of a joint session of Parliament.

Instead, the visit will be an overwhelmingly private affair as Harper and Obama are expected to speak on a few specific issues behind closed doors, notably the economy and Afghanistan.

"I wouldn't expect anything dramatic out of this," CTV's chief political correspondent Craig Oliver says.

The trip is planned to be only about five hours in length.

There will be a brief press conference but Canadian reporters are expected to only be allowed two questions, one in English, the other in French, for the U.S. president.

U.S. Secret Service have relented on their request to have Parliament Hill completely cleared and are now allowing some Canadians to gather on the hill (after an extensive search, of course) to get a brief glimpse of the president. Despite Obama's massive fan base in Canada, there won't be a quarter million people showing up, like there was in Berlin last summer.

Not quite a true tradition

After George W. Bush decided to make Mexico his first foreign trip as president, many Canadians felt that he broke with the tradition of visiting America's northern neighbour first.

But there is not quite as much tradition there as many Canadians believe. The first presidential visit to Canada wasn't until 1923 and the next wasn't until 1933.

Before Obama, only three of the last seven presidents made their first foreign trip to Canada. Jimmy Carter and Gerald Ford never even visited Canada during their time in office.

But will they be buddies?

On a personal and political level, it's hard to see Obama and Harper getting chummy on the golf course like Jean Chrétien and Bill Clinton.

Obama is charismatic and charming, whereas Harper has made a career on his lack of personality. Obama reaches across party lines, where Harper had to cause a constitutional crisis before deciding to play nice with the opposition. Obama is a basketball guy -- Harper is a hockey fan.

But there are some characteristics the two men share. They are both relatively young for their positions, Obama is 47, Harper, 49, and both have two school-aged children.

And although each man comes from a very different political position, there is little doubt that both leaders want the same thing -- to get their country's economy back on track.

Kory Teneycke, Harper's director of communications, predicts the two leaders will get along well.

But he told The Canadian Press the visit "is not primarily to have a social relationship, it's to work together in the interests of both of their individual countries."

But having a close, or at least quite cordial, relationship with the U.S. president is certainly not without benefit.

Franklin Roosevelt and MacKenzie King, both the longest-serving leaders in the history of their respective countries, were close friends. The pair governed during the two most trying periods of the 20th century and set much of the foundation for Canadian-American relations as it is today.

They were also good enough friends that after Roosevelt died, King claimed he continued to communicate with FDR's spirit from beyond the grave.  

Roosevelt visited Canada a record eight times while in office and even had a summer home on Campobello Island off New Brunswick.

"When I have been in Canada, I have never heard a Canadian refer to an American as a 'foreigner.' He is just an 'American.' And, in the same way, in the United States, Canadians are not 'foreigners,' they are 'Canadians.' That simple little distinction illustrates to me better than anything else the relationship between our two countries," Roosevelt said in a visit to Quebec in 1936.

But other relationships between Canadian prime ministers and U.S. presidents have hardly been friendly, let alone professional.

Richard Nixon was caught calling Pierre Trudeau an "asshole" on tape. Trudeau responded that he had been called "worse by better people." 

John Kennedy and John Diefenbaker detested one another, with the Canadian quoted as calling the charismatic president, "that young fool."

U.S.-Canadian relations suffered so greatly during that period that Diefenbaker's cabinet actually revolted against him.

But name calling has nothing on an incident between then-president Lyndon Johnson and Canadian prime minister Lester Pearson in 1965. After Pearson called for a pause in the bombing of Vietnam while speaking in Philadelphia, Johnson was reportedly furious at the Canadian's criticism of U.S. policy.  

When Pearson visited Johnson the next day at Camp David, the 6'3" president grabbed Pearson by the collar and lifted him into the air (or pinned him against a wall, depending on which historian you read) and yelled, "You pissed on my rug!"

If you set the prime minster-president relationship bar there, it's hard to imagine any scenario where Harper and Obama could possibly lower it.

With files from The Canadian Press

Comments are now closed for this story

JP
said

Mr Harper
PLEASE do not embarrass CANADA when you meet the President-
May if you keep ypur mouth shut - you will do the people of Canada a great favour


Paula
said

I agree with the sensible people who are not impressed with the Coalition JACKALS, who are so jealous of Harper that they even hate each other. Ignatieff snarls and would bite his ankles,if he got the chance. Such loud, childish behaviour and Rae should learn to be silent, until he quits taking his clothes off with Rick Mercer, at the lake. These people are unfit to fill any leadership positions...and Harper is respectable and intelligent...like Obama. At last, some common sense.


Hughes
said

Obama is a Socialist so Harper and he are at different ends of the political spectrum. Franklin DelanObama just spent more on HIS new deal than Bush spent in 7 years in office!

Go Steven!


Canadian Living/Working in the US
said

I am so sick of everyone saying how cold Harper is, do you realize that even though he may seem cold and too ideological that you should be bending over and kissing the ground he walks on. In today's economic turmoil I am grateful to have a party in power that know something about the economy and how to protect the interests of Canada. God help us if the Liberal's get back in... they will waste more money and turn us truly into a greater depression than they left us with in the 90's. Doesnt anyone care about a fiscally responsible government? I sure do. I currently live in the US and am watching as this country slowly implodes on itself, which is what will happen if the Liberals have their pocket lining self serving way all over again.


Chris Slothouber
said

Obama and Biden will re-engage with the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC) -- the main international forum dedicated to addressing the climate problem. They will also create a Global Energy Forum of the world’s largest emitters to focus exclusively on global energy and environmental issues.


Chris Slothouber
said

From BarackObama.com: "I support extending fully equal rights and benefits to same-sex couples under both state and federal law. That is why I support repealing the Defense of Marriage Act and the "Don't Ask Don't Tell" policy, and the passage of fully inclusive laws to protect LGBT Americans from hate crimes and employment discrimination. And that is why I oppose the divisive and discriminatory efforts to amend the California Constitution, and similar efforts to amend the U.S. Constitution or those of other states."


Andrea
said

Honestly, they may agree on a few things, but I have a feeling Iggy and Obama will have more in common. They both went to Harvard, or taught at Harvard.


NOT SO Concerned Canadian
said

blah blah blah George W. Bush, blah blah Stephen Harper. Blah blah EVIL. blah blah Obama and Ignatieff... Same old PM bashing and President exalting rhetoric. These two men will get along fine, personality never meant much in PM-Pres relations. I cannot believe the naivity of some people who still think Mr. Harper has a man-crush on Bush. If anything, the PM sabre-rattled with Bush more often than any Lib PM did. Arctic Sovereignty, deadline on Afghanistan mission... list goes on ALL against what Bush wanted. Obama and Harper will get along quite well, because they both are leading countries in perilous times, they both are strong leaders and quite revolutionary to the status-quo (Harper vs the Liberal hegemony, Obama vs the Bush hegemony with a brief Clinton interlude). Both these guys have a lot to prove yet, and they both have to appease their respective political houses for bills to be passed (the President has to sell his ideas in Congress and his own "party" can vote against him, and the PM is stuck against a bigot-ridden socialist opposition). Both have the stuff upstairs to change the continent, but they both run the risk of being blocked at every turn because of the way the US government is set up and because of the ungodly minority parliament abomination we have here.
PS: enough with the Bush = Harper nonsence, that is just propaganda hidden behind a curtain of free speech


korie
said

oil and water is right! harper needs to grow a pair and be tough with the lacking nafta agreement, needs to be strong on the protectionism aspect of obama's policy and needs to stand up for the return of canadian soldiers in the middle east.
those were bush's screwup and now harper needs to fix them or we will be seeing a big change in canada's governing party. represent canada harper, this is one of your few chances to loo good to canadians in general.


Jason
said

Harper and Bush were buddies. Bush is being investigated for war crimes. Harper should be subject to the same.

Answer: Obama will tolerate Harper until Canadians come to their senses as the Americans have.


andre
said

The new President may talk like a Baptist preacher but the US doesn't needs a preacher right now. We may will see that the number of fans is a lot smaller in about twelve months time. As far as I am concerned, I prefer a stateman who promises to maintain stability over one that promises to make change. promises


Jay
said

Sandi-Ontario
You may want to check his plans.I have a massive amount of respect for obama but some of his ideas i am not sure if they will work.


DK
said

I suspect that most of the negative comments about Harper are from people in Ontario. Thats no surprise because that is Liberal country. It is actually the liberals who have made relations between US and Canada difficult the last few years and at least Steve is hosting Obama and making the diplomatic effort.


Joel in Kamloops
said

The only thing that matters is that it is a professional relationship. All this personal stuff is embroidery. I'd much rather have a professional relationship between leaders than a buddy-buddy relationship.

Governing countries is a profession.


BO
said

A fake celebrity is coming. Big deal! So far Obama did NOTHING of substance. I wish him well but I am very sceptical that he would be a good President. I hope he will be smart enough to learn from Harper a thing or two about running the economy of the state.


Harper = Bush, not Obama
said

Harper's policies are more closely realted to Bush's than Obama's. We know what Obama thought of these. They will never be idealogical frinds.


Cam West
said

As Canadian political parties are, I am sure that Harper will be TOO left wing for Obama. Remember center in Canada is pretty left wing in the States.

As Newsweek cover story proclaims:
said

We're all socialists now.

Day by day, Harper government slips farther
said

into the past.

The so-called "free market" was effectively declared dead by Bush.

Get with the revised program.

Chris in Ontariariari-Oh!
said

I think there is a lot less emphasis on the importance of the personal relationship today as maybe there once was.Both leader's are very businesslike in there approach to governance and are more focused on the issue's at hand.

The conservative's have cultivated a strong network of contact's within the bureaucracy of Washington and that is where the real nut's and bolt's of policy lie.I think they have made a far greater effort of reaching out to our American neighbour's than has been characteristic of previous Liberal government who have used the relationship to political advantage should the need arise during an election.American bashing was alway's a good way of deflecting criticism of their policy's.Stoking Canadian patriotism is something the Liberal's feel they hold the patent on.

I think a lot has changed since Brian Mulroney's rendition of "Irish Eye's are Smiling" with Ronald Reagan and Jean Chretien's photo-op's with Bill Clinton on the golf course.There is a greater sense of urgency between both leader's in dealing with the pressing issue's at hand and less concern about "personality's".


Obama's meeting with Harper goes like this . . .
said

"Here are your orders, Harper or Harker or whatever your name is."

"Yes, sir, Obama, sir."

Bob
said

Harper is a great diplomat dedicated to the best interest of Canadians. They will be good friends as it is in the best interest of both leaders.

Harper is running a big deficit.
said

That's far left.

In the U.S.
said

Much ado about nothing. A five hour visit will yield as much as a two-hour phone call. They'll discuss trade and Canada's role in Afghanistan and that will be it. Nothing will be agreed to, decided or signed. This is a complete waste of time for both.

So he goes to Canada first. Whoop-dee-do. This is a non-event in America.


Miss Real
said

Obama is such a fake. I can't believe there are so many people captivated with that phoney smile and his "pretty" words, or rather the things he says when he's not muttering "uh." Seriously, people, are you that blind? This guy reminds me of those crazy cult preachers that make people think they're performing miracles when, in reality, it's just cheap tricks! I'm proud of our PM, and I'm sure Obama will be feeling very small when he meets someone who is actually qualified to be a leader.


the old lady
said

The two Leaders will get along just fine. It is usually the media that causes the problems with speculating about things. Both Men are well educated and are of the new generation of people. We have finally gotten rid of the old foggies.


Jeff from Moose Jaw.
said

I think that the current state of the economy, coupled with the on-going battle in Afghanistan, will focus both leaders attention on forging constructive, bi-national programs/policies .


James Johnson
said

The ground work for the prosperity we enjoyed during the Chretien- Clinton era was layed out during the Mulroney-Reagan era.Sorry but the golf coures that Chretien built in Quebec didn't lead to our prosperity free trade did.


VIC
said

"Spend money to make money" is a very simple theory in U.S. eyes. Harper will hardly persuade Obama pour money to buy Canadian products.

"Buy American" campaign will definitely harzarous our weaken economy.

Conservative government so mint will spend stimulate money $20 billion in compare to U.S. spending $2000 billion.

Tim
said

Gerald, you're right. This will be a meeting about oil and water... literally.


André in Ontario
said

@ Me
Lets look at what you said. We have a very intelligent PM & he has been treated terrible. What???????????? Let's look at how he's treated Canadians in the past few months. Mislead Canadians during the election, his economic statement & to all you Harperyte he lied to you all on his budget. An intelligent PM wouldn't have put himself in the position he was put in by the much hated coalition. The guy forgot he was in a minority government. He's now getting the treatment his deserved. Harper & Oboma won't get along. There ideology is completely different.
As for Canada's dealing with the US we must be very careful. They have a long history of being pirate like if were not careful. Harper has shown in the past that he's not the person to deal with free trade issues. Everyone must remember soon after coming into power he & Emerson sold out the soft wood industry out of $5 billion when the WTO ruled in our favour. He would do the same to all industries of Canada if given the chance. Maybe not oil since daddy was an exec or was for Imperial Oil.


Red X
said

Not likely given that the U$ is broke and have to save and create jobs. Harper is not as right wing as the Democrats.
Though Ian Brodie did interfere with Obama's primary race last March to help Clinton & the Republicans. Harper should keep a lid on it given Obama is more charismatic...


E.
said

In response to Reece's comment, I can think of a liberal that supported "such policies", Mr. Ignatieff was one of the most supportive liberals when it came to the Iraq war. My, my how selective people's memory becomes when it suites them.
Fact is that the Canadian public knows very little about Ignatieff, the Man or the Politician, and as time passes and we all get a better look at him, I predict we will have a great number of liberals that will be quietly disappointed.
I would not write off the Conservative party just yet.

Jim McB
said

This story is very biased against our PM. The media and the left side of the political spectrum in this country refuses to acknowledge that our government was acting a year ago to protect us against the recession, they have had some major success while the American record is dismal and deteriorating daily.

Obama wants to talk to the PM to find out first hand what is working and what is not and the impact of the policies of both countries on each other. These two leaders are sufficiently bright to deal in that realm, and popularity has no role in doing what is needed. Popularity is the weapon of the failed side of any political action, once you have lost your credibility it is easy to attack your opponents popularity. Any left wing blog or newspaper will provide ample proof of this assertion.

A business meeting is exactly what is required; a popularity contest should be avoided because it only creates disdain. In this format Obama has almost no chance to incite controversy, the relationship between the two men will be a private matter because it is of no consequence, and a joint message of hope and cooperation might go a long way in thawing the fear resident in investors and consumers.

This wil be a visit remembered in the histories of both our countries. It will be a dissapointment to the left because there will be no oppotunity to impugn their own country or its leader, unless they create one!

schpid
said

Reece - right back at ya. !million dead because of Bush. Qoute your source please. Contary to what you may believe, one person does not dictate American policy. Iraq was wrong, no doubt about it and we were wise not to follow. Just like any other Country, the US has interests and obligations around the world and must step up and if necessary, use force to protect them. It would be great if we could all play nice but that is NEVER going to happen no matter how many candles are lit.
When it comes to cross border issues, each leader is of course going to side with their own lobby groups.
There will not be a new world order just because Obama was elected


Trent
said

I don't care if there freinds or not..I want him to ensure Canada is taken care of.. Unlike some people he cares about all Canadians not just those who help him... So keep Canada running

L
said

"ME", I agree with you 100%! We have an intelligent PM who actually knows what he's doing and our country is better off because of him, yet there are so many lefties around bashing him and calling him "evil" and claiming the Conservatives will be banished. It's an embarrassment to REAL Canadians who can think for themselves and aren't brainwashed by the media that these ignorant people plague our country with their Obama praise and anti-Harper babbling. You can't help but wish they had an off switch!

MK
said

"Obama reaches across party lines, where Harper had to cause a constitutional crisis before deciding to play nice with the opposition." LOL! It's obvious who the author of this passage is for and against! Harper didn't cause the constitutional crisis, he was the one who wanted to play nice in the first place, but the opposition had their hearts set on taking him down just because of the utterly immature reason he was PM and they weren't! The biggest difference between Obama and Harper is that Harper has experience and is a professional while Obama is all charm but no action, well, no desirable action so far.

Majority Of One
said

How could President Obama become friends with Harper? It would be much like befriending a door knob... yes, serves a purpose but of limited use.

Rob NS
said

"Dave Williams, PHD in Basket weaving for the left wing loonies"
While the world is in turmoil, you try to add to it by insulting our recently elected, for the second time in a row, PM. He has more votes than anyone else, because Canadians know he can do the job, proof is already there. If you only want to insult our leaders, please try another venue.

Sheryl SK
said

I would like to think that Harper will have an open mind with this visit with Obama and that they do in fact settle some things that are intended to be discussed. I really like the no fan fair in these economic times and it's time to get down to brass tacks.


Rob
said

Mr Harper was never a "Bush fan",(Harper wanted to give him the back of the hand with a "Steve" comment) but was professional because of the office he holds. He actually has more in common with Obama than Bush.
Canadian PC party is on the same lines as Obama's goverment, the Libs and NDP are so far left, there is no American party to compare to.


The hammer
said

Based on their legacies to date, I doubt Monsieur Harper could even qualify to be President Obama's executive assistant. After all, one is constantly preaching and attempting to promote transparency while out Prime Minister works contantly in a cloak of secrecy all they while muzzleing his Minister's and backbenchers for fear of his real agenda being let out of the bag. I'm sure President Obama knows Mr. Harper's track record to date and of his close companionship with the last President of the U.S.A.


Mark -Vegreville, AB
said

I couldn't care less if their families vacation together at Disneyland, all I want to see is a good professional relationship.


What I am trying to understand is why it is all of a sudden so important for our Prime Minister and the American President to be so close? Harper got along reasonably well (though by no means became a beer drinking buddy) with Bush and was labeled a "Lap Dog". Now that someone who makes better speeches is in the Oval Office it seems that we want this to happen. Get over the God-Like worship of Obama people. You and people around the world are setting yourselves up for a massive disappointment. Obama is not Jesus Christ and Harper is not the Devil incarnate. They are just two men doing their best for their respective countries.


WB
said

Beats me how so many Canadians idolize Obama like a messiah. First, American Democrats are way to the right of the Conservatives here. Second, Obama is accelerating the implosion of the American economy with his 'Porkulus' spending bill, while our Conservative government tries to be moderate in the face of a very reckless 'coalition' in opposition.

jeff
said

Ignatieff is friends with Obama and his friends. Harper knows this.....Harpers line of thinking is yesterdays news.


brett
said

i think "chris s" needs to check his facts.....obama believes in the traditional definition of marriage like harper. he also says that kyoto will be ineffective and like harper has said that alternative forms of pollution control are needed. he also promotes "clean coal". if harper promoted a "clean coal" initiative her in canada he'd be strung up by the media in toronto. why don't you check out barackobama.com for your research.


James
said

Hmm a free-market capitalist in Canada and european socialist-communist in the US. Not likely to get along.

But hey, if the US keeps going the way it is, many americans could be packing up and heading north.

Cathie F. Oshawa
said

As Canadians, we try to believe in our neighbours to the south. I say "NO BORDERS". Yes, I believe that Harper and Obama will do buisiness more so than socialize on this visit. I am sure there will be more talking of the economy and the WAR in Afghanistan.

ME
said

Many Canadian People are making fools of themselves falling over Obama, a man who since the primaries has stated he wants to re-negotiate free trade. For a lifetime, Canadians have critisized USA now all of a sudden because this guy is in he is going to walk across water. Well he better get a map of where the stones are. Get off the soap box people, we have an extremely intelligent prime minister and he is treated terribly by those who do not bother to find out the truth about what is going on.

Reece
said

@schpid

"Funny how all the anti-Bush people say it's OK now to be friends with the US. US policies, especially foreign, are not going to change that drastically from when Bush was in power"

It´s even funnier how the pro-Bush people try to equate left wing prosperity under Chretien and Clinton with the likes of Bush. Nobody could argue that the past 8 years under Bush was nothing less then HORRIFIC - that is putting it mildly. The policies of Bush had seriously eroded the sovereignty of the USA and cost the lives of over 1 million civilians. A liberal simply wouldn´t defend those policies and that is where the differences become abundantly apparent. Those that 'enjoyed' the policies of Bush went on to vote for the likes of Palin and McCain. Do I need to say more?

Rob, Sackville NB
said

The fact that Obama waited for Ignatieff's signal about the fate of the government is an embarrassment for Harper.

Phil
said

There is an unusually strong anti-Harper bias to the comments on this blog. I LOVE IT!!!

As soon as this recession is over, the entire Conservative movement will be happily banished from Ottawa for decades! :)

GaryinWpg
said

I hope Mr. Harper stands his ground for the sake of this nation. Mr. Obama talks a fine talk, but the actions seem to be less than stellar. But then again, governing by means of the Cloven-Piven Strategy is all Obama needs I guess.


Chris Slothouber
said

'brett' is wrong. Obama openly supports gay rights issues, he's mentioned this is his speeches. He supports the repealing of the Defense of Marriage Act and the "Don't Ask Don't Tell" policy. He's committed to FULL equality, something no amount of opposition pressure would ever see Harper do. Further, Obama supports much stricter GHG emission standards, including HARD caps, unlike Harper. It's going to be interesting to see Harper recant his refusal to participate in carbon trading once the US creates such a market. Of course, he'll act like it was his plan all along. Don't be dooced, do your own research (Google), and think for yourself, Canada!


SK Doctor
said

Of course, they have the interests of their respective countries at heart, and both nations need each other...

schpid
said

Funny how all the anti-Bush people say it's OK now to be friends with the US. US policies, especially foreign, are not going to change that drastically from when Bush was in power. The pressure from the US citizens and business is going to be just as hard, if not harder now, than this time last year.
We are neighbours and have many common interests, including continental defence and trade. This means that we have to work TOGETHER. I look forward to reaction if Obama asks Canada to extend the Afghan mission. Will it be an acceptable request coming from him more so than if Bush had asked for it?

Keith S
said

I was wondering how you'd get through that without mentioning Regan and Mulroney even once, the 2 leaders with the closest relationship.

Ray in Sask
said

No. This meeting will be business as usual. They may call each other friends on the Political Stage, but their ideas are different.

Not that it means with Ignatieff in power would have been any better. That really depends on how he kept up with his Ivy League colleagues.

NT
said

He should take a page from Mulroney's materful playbook on foreign relations. Also Dave Williams that is one of the most biased and unintelligent comments I have ever read, PhD in what?

al
said

I will be embarrassed as a Canadian when Barack meets Harper. In all the turmoil and environmental skepticism that Harper possesses, I hope that Barack requests to speak to someone else. The ones that meets the most common initiatives would be Stephane Dion or Elizabeth May.

dwigget
said

I think both men are fundamentally smart enough to know that a positive working relationship is vital for both countries.

I don't care if they like each other... I care if they get along. Mature people can get along with people they need to get along with regardless of "compatibility".

The article notes some interesting similarities between the two men, though... age/family & the uniqueness of their situations in light of that, etc. I think in terms of relating to a person on a personal level this stuff is actually fundamentally valuable.

Dave Williams, Phd.
said

Obama and Harper have completely different personalities. Obama is very charismatic and honest, while Harper is EVIL and too ideologically driven!! I believe that Harper has a hidden agenda .... Thank God he will never have a majority government in Canada.

brett
said

obama has shown no effort to reach across party lines....some may make the case that obama is on the same page as harper on alot of social issues...such as capital punishment (obama supports openly supports it), kyoto accord (obama openly denounces it), gay marriage (obama openly denounces it).

Gerald Skowronski
said

This will be a meeting of oil and water, if you get my drift. One man the people seem to adore, the other people see as a shady used-car salesman who wouldn't tell them if the wheels were about to fall off. Nothing of any great importance will come of this meeting.

MD
said

Kennedy went on to have a very good relationship with Lester Pearson when he took over after Diefenbaker, much to Kennedy's relief. Hopefully, the Harper/Igantieff dynamic will mirror the Dief/Pearson chain of events and Obama and Ignatieff will be our gatekeepers soon.

KC
said

Are Harper and Obama going to be buddies?

Hell no!

Obama probably already knows that Harper is a Bush fan which means there is no common ground between these two.

Sandi - Ontario
said

I wish Obama were Canadian. He'd be my first choice for Prime Minister, no question. I've lost so much respect for ALL of our politicians.

Jack
said

Thank God you didn't mention Mulroney and Reagan "when Irish eyes are smiling".

rose
said

I wish they would cancel this visit till we see where we stand with free trade etc.
The Americans never give anything away. And if they can't get what they want they take over . Its the oil , gas, water, that they want form us not at our price but theirs.

Reece
said

These two men are completely different. Harper seems too uptight and self-conscious about himself. I think Obama will be all business with Harper and move on. No sense in prolonging awkward moments.

Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Politics Stories

Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper and his wife Laureen hold a panda bear at the Chongqing Zoo in Chongqing, China Saturday February 11, 2012. (THE CANADIAN PRESS/Adrian Wyld)

Harper's China visit wraps up with gift of pandas

More   6 Comments 6    1 Video(s) 1

Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper delivers a speech in Beijing on Wednesday, Feb. 8, 2012. (Adrian Wyld / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Harper changes gears in China to focus on education

More

Most Talked about Stories

I think he was pushed to take matters into his own hands. I have a teenage son and if he was involved with a drug dealer I would be furious and try anything to save him like this father did for his daughter. Why do police often say they can't do anything until it's too late? Whether it be a drug dealer or an abusive spouse, the police can't seem to do anything until something really bad happens. In this case they could have raided the drug dealers home and arrested him. The whole town knew what was going on in that house but yet the police chose to do nothing. Release this man and give him a medal for doing the right thing by his daughter. I can't wait to see the episode on W5, I will certainly be watching this one.

Shelley

W5: How far would you go to save your child?