Politics -
News Sections
Flaherty, CAW spar over automaker bailout plans
CTV News Video
|
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
The Canadian Press
Date: Wed. Nov. 12 2008 9:12 PM ET
TORONTO Federal Finance Minister Jim Flaherty says the issue of whether the government should bail out struggling auto manufacturers is controversial, and people in his own Ontario riding - the Canadian home of General Motors - are telling him not to do it.
"There are many people saying we should do something with respect to the auto sector," Flaherty said Wednesday at a conference of economists.
"But I can tell you even in my own riding, where I was yesterday, in Whitby-Oshawa ... there are lots of people who say, 'Don't do anything. Don't use my tax money to bail out an enterprise that may not survive."'
"These are not highfalutin rich people that are saying this to me - these are people on the street."
Automakers have said they need more than $1 billion in loan guarantees to help tide over the sector until demand in the U.S. recovers for North American-produced vehicles.
The three U.S.-based automakers have been pressing for an additional $50 billion in loans from Congress to help them survive the tough economy and pay for health-care obligations for retirees. That's on top of a previously approved $25-billion government loan package for new technology.
On Friday, GM reported a $2.5-billion loss in the third quarter and warned that its cash levels could fall below what's needed to run its business by the end of the year if the U.S. economy doesn't turn around and it doesn't get government aid.
The federal Conservatives have long rejected direct intervention in the auto sector.
But Flaherty suggested for the first time Sunday that Ottawa may be willing to help, with the proviso that aid is targeted at auto plants with viable prospects.
On Wednesday, he confirmed that discussions with Canada's Big Three auto manufacturers are in progress, and reiterated there is money to be spent under certain conditions.
"We have been having discussions with the Detroit Three here in Canada," Flaherty said.
"We have money available for innovation - transformational money, if I may call it that. Because at the end of the day, we need car makers who are making cars people want to buy."
Flaherty stressed the government must ensure any bailout would be tied to the "sustainability" of the sector, or the government risks a taxpayer backlash.
"We need to find a way, if we are going to be able to do something, find a way to ensure sustainability, survivability," he said.
"That has to be the goal, otherwise ... there's a backlash to governments using taxpayers' money in what is perceived to be a bailout of a failing business."
Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty said Wednesday night that government should take the time to listen to industry representatives, "find out exactly what the issues are."
"It's more of a listening opportunity for me," said McGuinty, who confirmed he's to meet with industry officials on Friday. "The questions they will expect from me is, tell me exactly why we should do this, what are we going to get out of this, we've provided support in the past and we've experienced job losses nonetheless, what assurances can you provide to the long term viability?"
About 400,000 direct and indirect jobs are related to auto in Ontario, McGuinty said. "It's the mainstay of 12 Ontario communities."
Chris Buckley, president of CAW Local 222 in Oshawa, said it's "absolutely disgusting" that Flaherty says he's only monitoring the situation when immediate action is required.
Buckley said Canada can't wait for the United States and president-elect Barack Obama to take office in January, saying he's worried GM in Canada could be gone by then.
"We're asking Flaherty and (Prime Minister Stephen) Harper to react immediately and not wait for the U.S. to take some kind of action," Buckley said in a phone interview.
"This is not just about autoworkers - this is about good-paying Canadian jobs, and as they evaporate, what it does to our community."
He said it would "be absolutely devastating" if the Harper Conservatives decide against financial help for automakers.
Any money for the auto industry should not be viewed as a bailout but an investment in the Canadian economy, said CAW national president Ken Lewenza.
"It can't be just giving...cash," Lewenza said, noting any solution should also address the growth of vehicles imported into Canada while North American automakers can't sell equal numbers into foreign markets.
In a meeting with Harper on Wednesday ahead of next week's throne speech, NDP Leader Jack Layton called on the prime minister to match a bailout proposal for the auto sector being floated in the United States.
Federal Industry Minister Tony Clement said the government does have a plan for the auto sector, but he didn't say whether the industry has made a formal request for financial aid.
"Certainly they've given me a real good sense on the ground as to what they're facing," Clement said. "We're examining our options."
However, Clement said the situation changes day by day, and Ottawa will act in the long-term interests of the industry.
"There's no point making a decision that affects cash flow in the industry for three or four months and then is of no further use or help," he said.
"We believe in the long-term viability of this industry in Canada."
Clement also said he's willing to talk to the CAW about what the union can do to help, but insisted that doesn't equate to a request for concessions.
While willing to talk, Lewenza said the new minister showed he has more to learn about the sacrifices autoworkers have already made.
"We have enhanced the industry by improving the productivity where the Canadian plants...have got to the top over the last five or six years," Lewenza said.
Ontario Progressive Conservative Leader John Tory said Ontario should look at appointing an "auto czar," an idea floated by Obama for the U.S.
Tory said it would be ideal to appoint "someone who is a person who understands the automobile industry and that could sit down with all the people involved ... and say, 'What could we do and how could we do it most effectively?"'
While the government has avoided direct help for the auto sector, it again came to the aid of Canadian banks Wednesday, announcing it will buy another $50 billion in residential mortgages to ease the credit crunch, tripling the amount of insured mortgages Ottawa can buy from banks by the end of the fiscal year.
User Tools
Related Stories
Most Popular
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
It is about time - as a grandparent I have watched our kids (who were allowed to fail although I do remember some nagging on our part) learn, I have watched our children now micro-manage their children. A big part of it is the fact that there are predators out there and an extreme reluctance on the parents part to alllow freedom that might result in the children becoming victims.
Email
Comments are now closed for this story
LP Markham
said
I am not an overpaid white collar person by any means.
I worked at a private airport for 18 years and barely earned half what unionized Air Canada lazy bums did. I worked 12 hour shifts with litle or no breaks on some days. I've attempted to train some of the laid off Air Canada and Canadian Airlines workers in 1990 and not one of them could keep up with the amount of work my fellow employees and I actually did in a day.
I know what real work is.
Don't tell me I'm overpaid. I've earned every penny I make. I will NEVER under any circumstance work for a union. They are useless except for health and safety. They should be destroyed at every level. They cost me more in taxes and purchasing costs than is worth it.
I don't want a large house. I don't want 2 cars. I don't go down to Florida or Mexico. I like winter and I like camping in a tent. Why do I have to compete for something I'm not interested in. I still say let the companies die if they must and screw the unions at the same time. Good riddance!
Gord
said
Ontario taxpayer
said
In the meantime, all of the money (YOUR money) that the Feds will eventually dole out to the dying 3 in Canada will amount to little more than a severance package when the plants start closing, and we'll never see a dime paid back. We might as well pay them so sit at home than finance further production of vehicles that aren't selling, and won't until the entire economy recovers.
This isn't rocket science people, it's reality.
Also, why haven't we heard the CAW leaders talking about their members willing to consider pay cuts, job sharing or benefits reduction as a way to contribute to their own future?
Mr. Flaherty - are you asking the same questions before you hand over taxpayer dollars??
Time's up - those $40/hr unskilled assembly jobs & the CAW-sponsored attitude of entitlement have finally caught up with you.
nc in alberta
said
This is because at some level, all arguments, questions and concerns on both sides are completely valid.
Should the government support one industry or business that faces huge losses when they can't possibly support all of the industries and businesses that face similar conditions?
Can we really afford to lose multiple, large industrial employers in the current economic climate?
What happens to a city if all the well paying jobs are lost?
If help is forthcoming what form should it take and how should it be administered?
I for one would hate to be making such decisions.
No wonder Jim is not smiling a broadly as usual.
Shan
said
Lucky_Eddie
said
GM, Ford & Chrysler execs have made some terrible decisions; we need some laws to prevent them from handing themselves ridiculously high pay and bonuses. But the CAW's gross abuse of their legal monopoly power to extract disgustingly obese rates of compensation (forget the salary, look at the benefits) makes their workers the second last (after the gov't "workers") to deserve any kind of sympathy.
Darlin Bonchek
said
Well You shouldnt speak of things you don't know. Last two contracts there was no increase because we were just glad to have jobs. You people who say don't help GM, How much will your house be worth when Oshawa turns into a ghost town?
schpid
said
Brian Peterborough
said
Toby
said
Peter S
said
This government has no problem wasting at least $22 billion in Afghanistan and buying up over inflated CMHC mortgages for $75 billion. But they can't help out the auto sector that has been good for many communities for several decades with a loan just over a billion to help them out? You have to be kidding me. Oh I forgot, this government is only worried about bending over for the foreign oil and gas industry to rape Canada of its resources. Silly me. Sigh.
shayne
said
M
said
Greg in Oshawa
said
SJH
said
The auto industry is extremely bloated and has been for a long time.
At one time these companies were making money hand over fist. There was tons of cash to spare for high wages and benfits. The problem is, the market shifted, but the mentality didn't.
Without re-organization, it's not a question of whether or not we let GM fail.
It's simply a question of how many billions in tax-payer dollars we sink into slowing it's failure.
Rob
said
GM should go, we will all be better off without them.
Steve Daly
said
It was predictable folks, get used to the idea.
We can't save jobs that aren't economical, it just won't wash. We can easily determine if any job is uneconomical... is there a waiting list to get the position? The only way there is a waiting list is if the perceived payback is higher than the perceived workload. That situation has ruled the auto sector for years. Folks think they are overpaid in auto sector jobs, not that the workers would ever admit that.
Bail out the auto sector... but start by voiding the exorbitant union contracts. Let both parties sit back down and work out a wage package that actually allows the companies to make money while paying a FAIR wage.
Heather
said
If GM was really interested in surviving, then 5 years ago when this current crunch was really starting to take shape, they would done a massive overhaul of their entire product line. They would have changed all their 4 and 6 cylinder engines into clean-burning diesels so that their cars would have the most power with the least operating costs. They could have completely taken VW's business away if they'd done this. They could have competed with the Asian companies with the gas sippers they make. If they were interested in surviving, they would have stopped making the gas-powered V8's, because a V6 diesel has much more power than a gas V8.
Gerald - Gadshill Station, Ontario
said
PCA
said
Andre Bogacz
said
Jeep, Minivan and yes a nice car the 300!
Thats one story, Ford and GM are another, but also have made decisions that cannot be corrected in this economic crisis. If you have not noticed or understood- consumers will not buy a car from companies or a product from any company that is near bankruptcy. SHore it up now and take stock positions/warrants, that way we can have a say where jobs/investments go.
Or the option is, watch automotive jobs disappear. We need all the jobs we can keep, we don't need job losses- that means lost taxes and more problems for our society. Every good paying job is important.
Aid to the automakers first and Oabam/Bush will be playing second fiddle.
Andre in Windsor
Ian Ottawa
said
Bill
said
Hold on one minute. Maybe I'm nutsy koo koo but if the big 3 go,who is going to fill the void ? The other guys will have to up production correct ? Does that not mean more jobs, more factories, more spin offs to the suppliers ? I owned North American but quit after owning a Japanese car. I will never go back to NA. Two reasons. The Japanese vehicles are better. The unions and upper management deserve what they get from their greed and stupidity. To you overpayed union people, join the real world now. The party is over.
vern
said
David Chan
said
RJ
said
JAMES
said
The rich get richer and the poorer get poorer.
Pretty soon a family working non union jobs can't afford houses cause of the fees(taxes) to pay for union services(teachers, city workers).
LP Markham
said
Besides, not everyone is going to get hurt even if we go into a depression. I have no investments and my housing is neither owned or rented. I'd love to see house prices come back down to earth. somewhere around $100K for a 1300 sq ft house is what it actually costs to buid them. A house is a place to live, not an investment.
My employement is also recession proof, so.. too bad guys. You tried to make money. I just want to live simple. You deserve the hardship since you force it on me just to feed my family.
Laz
said
J.on Leduc
said
Marian
said
Joel Bennett, Calgary
said
Is it really that hard to figure that out?
Nicole
said
Al
said
Alan
said
no, to university to get a real education and do something moral and progressive for society instead of building poluting junk. If you can't cut it then move on friend.
Angus
said
MH
said
Ryan
said
I agree with you fully, if we don't support the automotive, the fallout will be more widespread than just the automotive sector.
When you look at a town like Oshawa, an overwhelming amount of the town's economy is driven from the GM plant. Think about all the homes built there because of employees at the GM plant. Think about the shops (both big and small) in which large percentage of their patrons are employees at the GM plant.
Think of it like a giant cyclical chain - it doesn't matter where it breaks. The point is that it's broken!!!
Ted
said
...wow Alan that's progressive, neo con thinking. Would this apply to premature babies and puppies and cancer victims too...survival of the fittest, my ass! Well maybe America should stop subsidizing the industries of war and destuction to the toon of 1 trillion, but no who wants good paying technology intensive jobs in Canada...back to hewers of wood and drawers of water for us.
wake up people
said
Alan
said
Allan
said
darren
said
AR
said
How does he keep getting elected!!
edie, Georgian Bay
said
Joe - Hamilton
said
He's now procrastinating in helping Ontario in some capacity. I guess replacing well paying jobs with lower paying (i.e less income tax collected)service sector employment my help them say Look More Jobs created in Ontario.