Politics -   

1
Federal Finance Minister Jim Flaherty speaks to journalists in downtown Toronto on Wednesday Nov.12, 2008. (Chris Young/ THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Flaherty, CAW spar over automaker bailout plans

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV Toronto: John Musselman with reaction
Finance Minister Jim Flaherty says residents in his Whitby-Oshawa riding don't want the auto sector bailed out. John Musselman gets reaction from Oshawa, home of GM Canada.
CTV Newsnet: BNN's Amanda Lang with business headlines
Ontario's minister of economic development spoke to BNN about the prospect of provincial aid for the ailing auto industry. Also the markets are took a beating after Henry Paulson announced an adjustment in the U.S. bailout.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (46) Facebook   

Date: Wed. Nov. 12 2008 9:12 PM ET

TORONTO — Federal Finance Minister Jim Flaherty says the issue of whether the government should bail out struggling auto manufacturers is controversial, and people in his own Ontario riding - the Canadian home of General Motors - are telling him not to do it.

"There are many people saying we should do something with respect to the auto sector," Flaherty said Wednesday at a conference of economists.

"But I can tell you even in my own riding, where I was yesterday, in Whitby-Oshawa ... there are lots of people who say, 'Don't do anything. Don't use my tax money to bail out an enterprise that may not survive."'

"These are not highfalutin rich people that are saying this to me - these are people on the street."

Automakers have said they need more than $1 billion in loan guarantees to help tide over the sector until demand in the U.S. recovers for North American-produced vehicles.

The three U.S.-based automakers have been pressing for an additional $50 billion in loans from Congress to help them survive the tough economy and pay for health-care obligations for retirees. That's on top of a previously approved $25-billion government loan package for new technology.

On Friday, GM reported a $2.5-billion loss in the third quarter and warned that its cash levels could fall below what's needed to run its business by the end of the year if the U.S. economy doesn't turn around and it doesn't get government aid.

The federal Conservatives have long rejected direct intervention in the auto sector.

But Flaherty suggested for the first time Sunday that Ottawa may be willing to help, with the proviso that aid is targeted at auto plants with viable prospects.

On Wednesday, he confirmed that discussions with Canada's Big Three auto manufacturers are in progress, and reiterated there is money to be spent under certain conditions.

"We have been having discussions with the Detroit Three here in Canada," Flaherty said.

"We have money available for innovation - transformational money, if I may call it that. Because at the end of the day, we need car makers who are making cars people want to buy."

Flaherty stressed the government must ensure any bailout would be tied to the "sustainability" of the sector, or the government risks a taxpayer backlash.

"We need to find a way, if we are going to be able to do something, find a way to ensure sustainability, survivability," he said.

"That has to be the goal, otherwise ... there's a backlash to governments using taxpayers' money in what is perceived to be a bailout of a failing business."

Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty said Wednesday night that government should take the time to listen to industry representatives, "find out exactly what the issues are."

"It's more of a listening opportunity for me," said McGuinty, who confirmed he's to meet with industry officials on Friday. "The questions they will expect from me is, tell me exactly why we should do this, what are we going to get out of this, we've provided support in the past and we've experienced job losses nonetheless, what assurances can you provide to the long term viability?"

About 400,000 direct and indirect jobs are related to auto in Ontario, McGuinty said. "It's the mainstay of 12 Ontario communities."

Chris Buckley, president of CAW Local 222 in Oshawa, said it's "absolutely disgusting" that Flaherty says he's only monitoring the situation when immediate action is required.

Buckley said Canada can't wait for the United States and president-elect Barack Obama to take office in January, saying he's worried GM in Canada could be gone by then.

"We're asking Flaherty and (Prime Minister Stephen) Harper to react immediately and not wait for the U.S. to take some kind of action," Buckley said in a phone interview.

"This is not just about autoworkers - this is about good-paying Canadian jobs, and as they evaporate, what it does to our community."

He said it would "be absolutely devastating" if the Harper Conservatives decide against financial help for automakers.

Any money for the auto industry should not be viewed as a bailout but an investment in the Canadian economy, said CAW national president Ken Lewenza.

"It can't be just giving...cash," Lewenza said, noting any solution should also address the growth of vehicles imported into Canada while North American automakers can't sell equal numbers into foreign markets.

In a meeting with Harper on Wednesday ahead of next week's throne speech, NDP Leader Jack Layton called on the prime minister to match a bailout proposal for the auto sector being floated in the United States.

Federal Industry Minister Tony Clement said the government does have a plan for the auto sector, but he didn't say whether the industry has made a formal request for financial aid.

"Certainly they've given me a real good sense on the ground as to what they're facing," Clement said. "We're examining our options."

However, Clement said the situation changes day by day, and Ottawa will act in the long-term interests of the industry.

"There's no point making a decision that affects cash flow in the industry for three or four months and then is of no further use or help," he said.

"We believe in the long-term viability of this industry in Canada."

Clement also said he's willing to talk to the CAW about what the union can do to help, but insisted that doesn't equate to a request for concessions.

While willing to talk, Lewenza said the new minister showed he has more to learn about the sacrifices autoworkers have already made.

"We have enhanced the industry by improving the productivity where the Canadian plants...have got to the top over the last five or six years," Lewenza said.

Ontario Progressive Conservative Leader John Tory said Ontario should look at appointing an "auto czar," an idea floated by Obama for the U.S.

Tory said it would be ideal to appoint "someone who is a person who understands the automobile industry and that could sit down with all the people involved ... and say, 'What could we do and how could we do it most effectively?"'

While the government has avoided direct help for the auto sector, it again came to the aid of Canadian banks Wednesday, announcing it will buy another $50 billion in residential mortgages to ease the credit crunch, tripling the amount of insured mortgages Ottawa can buy from banks by the end of the fiscal year.

Comments are now closed for this story

LP Markham
said

Toby,

I am not an overpaid white collar person by any means.

I worked at a private airport for 18 years and barely earned half what unionized Air Canada lazy bums did. I worked 12 hour shifts with litle or no breaks on some days. I've attempted to train some of the laid off Air Canada and Canadian Airlines workers in 1990 and not one of them could keep up with the amount of work my fellow employees and I actually did in a day.
I know what real work is.

Don't tell me I'm overpaid. I've earned every penny I make. I will NEVER under any circumstance work for a union. They are useless except for health and safety. They should be destroyed at every level. They cost me more in taxes and purchasing costs than is worth it.
I don't want a large house. I don't want 2 cars. I don't go down to Florida or Mexico. I like winter and I like camping in a tent. Why do I have to compete for something I'm not interested in. I still say let the companies die if they must and screw the unions at the same time. Good riddance!


Gord
said

Structural problems need to be addressed before any of my money should be spent on saving this enterprize. Otherwise just giving them money will not solve the problem and the'll just be back for more once the first bailout is p***ed away.Let's start with the #30 per hour cost disadvantage with the Southern U.S. Honda,Toyota and BMW all seem to be doing well there.


Ontario taxpayer
said

I find it interesting that nobody on this list has mentioned the fact that not ONE of the North American automakers in Canada is actually CANADIAN. Whether we like it or not, if the US parent companies are looking to save their own skins (ie:jobs) they will ultimately take care of their own interests first. The new President-elect as much as said so.... !!
In the meantime, all of the money (YOUR money) that the Feds will eventually dole out to the dying 3 in Canada will amount to little more than a severance package when the plants start closing, and we'll never see a dime paid back. We might as well pay them so sit at home than finance further production of vehicles that aren't selling, and won't until the entire economy recovers.
This isn't rocket science people, it's reality.

Also, why haven't we heard the CAW leaders talking about their members willing to consider pay cuts, job sharing or benefits reduction as a way to contribute to their own future?
Mr. Flaherty - are you asking the same questions before you hand over taxpayer dollars??

Time's up - those $40/hr unskilled assembly jobs & the CAW-sponsored attitude of entitlement have finally caught up with you.


nc in alberta
said

If you look past the obvious ideological rhetoric, this really is a complicated situation.

This is because at some level, all arguments, questions and concerns on both sides are completely valid.

Should the government support one industry or business that faces huge losses when they can't possibly support all of the industries and businesses that face similar conditions?

Can we really afford to lose multiple, large industrial employers in the current economic climate?

What happens to a city if all the well paying jobs are lost?

If help is forthcoming what form should it take and how should it be administered?

I for one would hate to be making such decisions.

No wonder Jim is not smiling a broadly as usual.


Shan
said

I would support a bailout with one condition - it came with legislation that leveled the playing field so that employers would not be held hostage by unions. The current laws in support of unions are antiquated and do not apply to current circumstances. With a level employment playing field, the salaries would be brought back into reason and the industry would survive. Otherwise, please don't dump my good money into proping up expensive union jobs in Ontario that have and will continue to make the industry unsustainable.


Lucky_Eddie
said

Flaherty is showing why he belongs in this job. Okay, his comment about what people in his riding are telling him is absurd; this is a Finance Minister issue, not a local riding issue. Besides, the people who work at GM may work in his riding, but they're much too well-off to actually live there. But he's making the tough call and making it correctly.

GM, Ford & Chrysler execs have made some terrible decisions; we need some laws to prevent them from handing themselves ridiculously high pay and bonuses. But the CAW's gross abuse of their legal monopoly power to extract disgustingly obese rates of compensation (forget the salary, look at the benefits) makes their workers the second last (after the gov't "workers") to deserve any kind of sympathy.


Darlin Bonchek
said

Darlin

Well You shouldnt speak of things you don't know. Last two contracts there was no increase because we were just glad to have jobs. You people who say don't help GM, How much will your house be worth when Oshawa turns into a ghost town?


schpid
said

The big three had the chance to lead the way in fuel efficient vehicles but chose not to do so. Remember the Electric car put out in the US when California legislated emission standards? Once the State was sued by the Feds and backed off, every single car with the exception of one was repo'd but GM and crushed ( see "Who Killed the Electric Car")Imagine were we would be right now if the vehichle had been continued and with more R&D. Toyota and Honda have looked forward and have evolved. Like the Horse and Cart that Ford replaced, it seems now that the big three are destined to go the same way. Why should we bail out companies whose idea of change is bigger 8 and 10 cylinder cars and trucks? ay to make vehicles to sit on a lot because no one wants to buy them? Not my tax dollars


Brian Peterborough
said

I would like to see the CAW and the politicians get together and work out a co-operative solution. I suggest partial government help and some wage and benefit concessions from CAW members. I think the public outside of Oshawa and Oakville would agree with taxpayer involvement if CAW workers contribute to the solution.


Toby
said

To all of those that blame the unions for this mess because they are paid too much - well I bet you are all overpaid white collar workers that sit on your butt in a fancy office doing sweet nothings.


Peter S
said

Say what? Who are these people in Whitby and Oshawa that told Flaherty this? It wasn’t me and I have lived in Oshawa for over 30 years. It must be the johnny come lately commuters that decided to live out here in the last 5-10 years because it's cheaper. It's very easy for them to say screw GM as they have no connection to the region. I guess they won’t mind paying significantly higher property taxes when GM and other direct and indirect businesses leave the region if the auto sector goes.
This government has no problem wasting at least $22 billion in Afghanistan and buying up over inflated CMHC mortgages for $75 billion. But they can't help out the auto sector that has been good for many communities for several decades with a loan just over a billion to help them out? You have to be kidding me. Oh I forgot, this government is only worried about bending over for the foreign oil and gas industry to rape Canada of its resources. Silly me. Sigh.



shayne
said

Tell you what. I would give my tax dollars to support the auto industry if the CAW and UAW are willing to do thier part by renegotiating thier contracs, and the big three execs are willing to take salery and perk cuts (i.e. no bonuses while our government is footing the bill.). Lets be a team.


M
said

I do think we need to help the auto sector as it is much too important to our economy. The CAW ,however, needs to show some leadership and perhaps roll back some benefits and wages at the same time.They shouldn't sit there telling the government to help while they do nothing.I would hate to see all these families out of work and all this purchasing power eliminated. If the union does nothing who will they blame when they don't have a job? $20/hour is going to sound pretty good then won't it? The union has as much responsibility if not more than anyone in rebuilding this industry.


Greg in Oshawa
said

In the 19030's GM was part of a consortium that bought up transit lines so people would buy cars, then they fought against safety initiatives, fought pollution controls, fought against better corporate average fuel economy regulations, they were given tax breaks and incentives by states and provinces to build factories! Just look what GM did in "Pole Town" in Detroit in the 1980's when a whole community was razed just to build a GM factory-numerous homes and churches torn down! Just what has been the actual profit of GM in Canada. We'd be shocked if we knew what the after tax profit was of GM in Canada-and Ford and Chrysler too over the past few years! This madness has to stop!


SJH
said

The only way tax-payer money should be involved is if there is a major re-organization.

The auto industry is extremely bloated and has been for a long time.

At one time these companies were making money hand over fist. There was tons of cash to spare for high wages and benfits. The problem is, the market shifted, but the mentality didn't.

Without re-organization, it's not a question of whether or not we let GM fail.

It's simply a question of how many billions in tax-payer dollars we sink into slowing it's failure.


Rob
said

I am sick of all the bailout talk. Where was the government when the company I worked for closed its doors? No where to be seen. Why should GM get my hard earned money to stay around to build cars and trucks nobody wants, to keep overpaid staff and overpaid management. I don't see Honda or Toyota with their hands out looking for help, how can they do it and GM can't. Toyota has just opened another big plant near Woodstock. Toyota and Honda have created hundreds of jobs in Ontario.
GM should go, we will all be better off without them.



Steve Daly
said

The CAW, and UAW, have fought to get plants that produce gas-guzzlers... and now they are all up in arms that the things don't sell.

It was predictable folks, get used to the idea.

We can't save jobs that aren't economical, it just won't wash. We can easily determine if any job is uneconomical... is there a waiting list to get the position? The only way there is a waiting list is if the perceived payback is higher than the perceived workload. That situation has ruled the auto sector for years. Folks think they are overpaid in auto sector jobs, not that the workers would ever admit that.

Bail out the auto sector... but start by voiding the exorbitant union contracts. Let both parties sit back down and work out a wage package that actually allows the companies to make money while paying a FAIR wage.


Heather
said

If GM made quality, non-gas-guzzling junk, they wouldn't be in the spot their in. I don't see it as the union's fault.

If GM was really interested in surviving, then 5 years ago when this current crunch was really starting to take shape, they would done a massive overhaul of their entire product line. They would have changed all their 4 and 6 cylinder engines into clean-burning diesels so that their cars would have the most power with the least operating costs. They could have completely taken VW's business away if they'd done this. They could have competed with the Asian companies with the gas sippers they make. If they were interested in surviving, they would have stopped making the gas-powered V8's, because a V6 diesel has much more power than a gas V8.


Gerald - Gadshill Station, Ontario
said

Any money given to the car companies at this point will only help them pay severance.


PCA
said

The unions should have been kicked out a long time ago, this is the major reason the auto sector is in this mess.



Andre Bogacz
said

It was not so long ago that Chrysler was the darling of automotive- then a merger of equals left them worse than they were before the merger.
Jeep, Minivan and yes a nice car the 300!
Thats one story, Ford and GM are another, but also have made decisions that cannot be corrected in this economic crisis. If you have not noticed or understood- consumers will not buy a car from companies or a product from any company that is near bankruptcy. SHore it up now and take stock positions/warrants, that way we can have a say where jobs/investments go.
Or the option is, watch automotive jobs disappear. We need all the jobs we can keep, we don't need job losses- that means lost taxes and more problems for our society. Every good paying job is important.
Aid to the automakers first and Oabam/Bush will be playing second fiddle.
Andre in Windsor


Ian Ottawa
said

Give them a bailout and the union will demand a raise and the Executives will award themselves hefty bonuses. The fact that they never saved during the good years is there own fault. I shouldn't have to pay for that, we drive two used cars that we paid $6,000 for both because we couldn't afford new ones. Give US a break.


Bill
said

BILL
Hold on one minute. Maybe I'm nutsy koo koo but if the big 3 go,who is going to fill the void ? The other guys will have to up production correct ? Does that not mean more jobs, more factories, more spin offs to the suppliers ? I owned North American but quit after owning a Japanese car. I will never go back to NA. Two reasons. The Japanese vehicles are better. The unions and upper management deserve what they get from their greed and stupidity. To you overpayed union people, join the real world now. The party is over.


vern
said

Gm folding up wouldn't have as big an effect as people think. People in Oshawa think the world revolves around GM and they are very wrong. You can't expect the gov't to react overnight and save the company when the company has sat on it's hands for years building lousy cars nobody wants to buy. Get real, GM is finished!


David Chan
said

I can't think of any subject that brings out so much anger in people. Usually it's a debate between business oriented folks and those who are extremely furious with the whole union concept. Unfortunately the unions have so much power that they infuriate many people.


RJ
said

why should taxpayer money be used to bailout a company who WILL close plants,move jobs to Mexico and take care of their own American workforce first? maybe the its time for the workers take a look at how they get paid? $30 an hour? what they pay in taxes alot of people don't make in a year!


JAMES
said

Great our tax dollars going to support a industry where unions bargain for high wages ,benefits and good pensions. Oh well our property taxes go up for this same reason cause CUPE and OPSEU ask for more and municipalities have no choice. Face work stoppage so cities shut down or just get more funds out of homeowners who make medium wage.

The rich get richer and the poorer get poorer.

Pretty soon a family working non union jobs can't afford houses cause of the fees(taxes) to pay for union services(teachers, city workers).


LP Markham
said

Let the auto industry fail! The unions deserve all the hurt it will generate as they have never even tried to sugest loss of income or benefits so the company can survive.

Besides, not everyone is going to get hurt even if we go into a depression. I have no investments and my housing is neither owned or rented. I'd love to see house prices come back down to earth. somewhere around $100K for a 1300 sq ft house is what it actually costs to buid them. A house is a place to live, not an investment.
My employement is also recession proof, so.. too bad guys. You tried to make money. I just want to live simple. You deserve the hardship since you force it on me just to feed my family.


Laz
said

the big three are in trouble because they continued to make big gas guzzling monsters with poor engineering and quality then jamming those down our throats, instead of investing in research to make better fuel efficient cars; so when gas started climbing those cars sat on lots because people realized they were just too darned expensive. Further when times were relatively good they wrote off everything to avoid paying taxes; now they expect to further burden society and expect us to just give them money so they can continue their backwards ways. Thats like putting a kid through university and now he's graduated he's back home looking in the fridge and wondering what time moms going to cook dinner. the point is, if they couldn't invest in their own survival and well being then why should we ?


J.on Leduc
said

I am sorry people but the auto industry never wanted to wake up and smell the roses. All the american car and truck maker refused to change their plants over because of this mancho image. Well the day of reconning is here and no amounts of money will help. How can we compete against chinese and India wages and the worse thing is they can produce a better product HELLO!!!!Those the auto industry worker want to take a 50% cut? I dont think so. So let the foreigner produce the autos and we will buy the products.


Marian
said

Question to you all that are so very happy to give away taxpayer money so easy to companies that are overcharging as so much for the cars to start with !!! what did they do with their profits all those years? What about thinking of the future ? and to Chris Buckley, well what about them “immediate action is required” why they did not do nothing before and now just wanting and threatening people that they will lose jobs. ; think about it for a moment.


Joel Bennett, Calgary
said

I hate to say it, but he's right. We bail GM out now, at what cost? Maybe a billion. Then what? They continue to make Tahoes, HHRs, and other non-selling vehicles. The only way that they are going to stay afloat is if they actually produce vehicles people are willing to buy. What Flaherty means is that it is a bad idea to hand them a blank cheque. Instead, make them reform a bit in order to ensure that they stay afloat. It's a double win - GM stays in business, taxpayers don't have to repeatedly bail them out, and vehicles are made that people actually want to buy.

Is it really that hard to figure that out?


Nicole
said

The reality is that the union demands have priced themselves into this mess. The US companies are making some money off the line, but due to horrendous costs being paid in pension and health benefits to those no longer working they are running out of cash. This is coupled with years of pushing gas guzzlers and now that everyone wants small fuel efficient vehicles they are far behind on production. I see the reality, but the workers and unions are going to have to give something back if they hope to get. Most are uneducated, unskilled workers making more than their fair share. Welcome back to reality people. I think they need to let the Big 3 in the States go Chapter 11 and restructure before any bailout money is given.


Al
said

He must be talking to everyone but the autoworkers in his riding. Is this guy interested in all of Canada? The auto industry has powered the North American economy for decades. Who will in their absence....Walmart? Those against helping out out there will really be complaining when they see how this industry related to them, albeit, indirectly.


Alan
said

To Ted...

no, to university to get a real education and do something moral and progressive for society instead of building poluting junk. If you can't cut it then move on friend.


Angus
said

I am not in the auto sector, but common sense will tell you that the spin off effect of all jobs lost if the auto sector fails,suppliers etc., would be enormous.


MH
said

This is not the corner store going under folks! This is going to hurt everyone. If there ever was a cause to use our tax dollars to help an industry, this is it. Seems we are helping banks which can make their money back by screwing us over with endless fees etc. The auto industry was turning things around but the housing collapse combined with rediculous oil prices really threw a wrench into their plans. It's those who caused the housing collapse that are responsible for the whole mess. Remember....this downturn is affecting ALL auto makers. Let's get them through and rebuild our once thriving auto industry!


Ryan
said

@ "wake up people"...

I agree with you fully, if we don't support the automotive, the fallout will be more widespread than just the automotive sector.

When you look at a town like Oshawa, an overwhelming amount of the town's economy is driven from the GM plant. Think about all the homes built there because of employees at the GM plant. Think about the shops (both big and small) in which large percentage of their patrons are employees at the GM plant.

Think of it like a giant cyclical chain - it doesn't matter where it breaks. The point is that it's broken!!!


Ted
said

'if it can't survive on its own, let it go.'

...wow Alan that's progressive, neo con thinking. Would this apply to premature babies and puppies and cancer victims too...survival of the fittest, my ass! Well maybe America should stop subsidizing the industries of war and destuction to the toon of 1 trillion, but no who wants good paying technology intensive jobs in Canada...back to hewers of wood and drawers of water for us.


wake up people
said

45000 in Auto Assembly and 90000 in auto parts manufacturing(Ontario).....can we afford to lose these jobs? Guaranteed that steelmakers will fall like dominoes as well. This does not even count the jobs in the US! Losing this industry will cause a depression! I am not an auto worker but it's not hard to figure the math.Those against giving guaranteed LOANS to the automakers will be in for a big surprise if these companies should fall and will really see just how much this relates to the economy as a whole.....we will all be hurting! A huge loss of tax revenue means government program cuts and government job cuts.This WILL be the straw that breaks the camels back if we don't help the auto companies survive this downturn!


Alan
said

Whaddya know, even residents of Oshawa are saying "enough" of this nonsense. If it can't survive on its own then let it go.


Allan
said

Well, don't help out the auto companies. Just see what happens to the economy and your home values. Where's the $$$ going to come from to fund fed/prov programs? This would be a huge tax revenue loss since so many jobs are connected to the auto sector. Those who oppose can now help pay the EI and retraining costs. The loss of the auto giants would make the housing calamity in the states look like a mere annoyance.


darren
said

please don't give them anymore money! it is a complete waste, these companies will fold no matter now much money we prop them up with. People don't want these products anymore,thats the bottom line!


AR
said

What in the world is that man talking about, Would he prefer not only GM workers loose everything but also many small businesses in the Durham Region. I f the so called overpaid GM workers are not being paid who is going to support the durham economy.

How does he keep getting elected!!


edie, Georgian Bay
said

I agree, why should my tax dollars go to bail out the car companies. Maybe the unions should be bailing them out as it was their greed that put them in this position. If you ask a worker at a car plant to take a wage cut, or benefit cut to keep the company going they will not agree to it. They have made the North American car manufacturers lower quality on their product in order to make a profit. How can GM Ford or Chysler compete with the imports if the work force continues to bleed them for more and more.


Joe - Hamilton
said

Whats this guy smoking! First an Ontario MP & Finance Minister tells the world the Ontario is the last place to invest. He gets reelected (I voted Conservative) but was appalled by this guys lack of decorum.

He's now procrastinating in helping Ontario in some capacity. I guess replacing well paying jobs with lower paying (i.e less income tax collected)service sector employment my help them say Look More Jobs created in Ontario.



Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Politics Stories

Quebec student strikes, tuition fees, Montreal, Quebec

Quebec students, government to resume talks Monday

More   27 Comments 27    4 Video(s) 4

Newfoundland and Labrador Premier Kathy Dunderdale receives applause from party members as the House of Assembly opens in St. John's on Monday, March 5, 2012. (Paul Daly /  THE CANADIAN PRESS)

EI changes unfair to N.L., Dunderdale says

More   20 Comments 20    1 Video(s) 1

In this Monday, Sept. 19, 2011 file photo, Fereidoun Abbasi Davani speaks during a news conference at the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna, Austria. (AP Photo/Ronald Zak)

Iran says no reason to halt 20 per cent enrichment

More   8 Comments 8  

Most Talked about Stories

It is about time - as a grandparent I have watched our kids (who were allowed to fail although I do remember some nagging on our part) learn, I have watched our children now micro-manage their children. A big part of it is the fact that there are predators out there and an extreme reluctance on the parents part to alllow freedom that might result in the children becoming victims.

Harvey

Parents must learn to stop meddling, author urges