Politics -   

1
Roy Kilgo examines a voting ballot as he waits in line in Charlotte, N.C., Tuesday, Nov. 4, 2008. (AP / Chuck Burton) A robot named Hotshot protests electronic voting near a voting station in Reno, Nevada, Tuesday, Nov. 4, 2008. (Nevada Appeal / Kevin Clifford) A line stretches down a block and around the corner as voters wait in line on election day in the South End neighbourhood of Boston, Tuesday, Nov. 4, 2008. (AP / Charles Krupa) Dee Reed and her six year-old son Kevon wait patiently outside of Olive B. Loss Elementary school as they wait for the polling place to open on election day in Bear, Del. on Tuesday, Nov. 4, 2008. (AP / The News Journal, Ron Soliman) First voter, Tanner Tillotson, front centre, of Dixville Notch cast his ballot at the nation's presidential election in Dixville Notch, N.H. Tuesday Nov. 4, 2008. (AP / Cheryl Senter)

Americans wait hours to vote in historic election

Viewer

CTV News Video

Mike Duffy Live: Jim Zogby, Zogby International
While the entire world waits for the results in the 2008 U.S. election, the face of American politics has changed with a historic voter turnout expected, in an election that has energized American voters.
CTV Newsnet: Darrell West, Brookings Institution, on the volunteers working for both sides to get out the vote
As the candidates make their closing arguments, an army of volunteers on both sides are working behind the scenes to get out the vote.
CTV Newsnet: Correspondents with details on what prompted the long lines at polling stations
Both the Democrats and Republicans have put out a call for people to vote, and Americans are responding, prompting long lines at polling stations.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (35) Facebook   

Date: Tue. Nov. 4 2008 6:50 PM ET

The lines are stretched for blocks and blocks in some American cities, as voters have lined up by the thousands to cast their ballots in the 2008 U.S. election.

There are reports of people waiting as long as four to six hours in some locations. Much of the delays are due to the sheer numbers of voters showing up at polling stations, but there have also been some problems with electronic voting machines.

In New Jersey, some voters were forced to use paper ballots because of an electronic glitch. There were also problems with voting machines in Pennsylvania and Virginia.

Another problem in Virginia didn't have as much to do with new technology as it did with an old fashioned mistake: a head librarian overslept and a polling station wasn't opened on schedule. There were also accusations that voter suppression had occurred in the battleground state, with a judge refusing late Monday to extend the polling window or add more voting machines in some areas with high black populations.

The adjustments had been demanded in a federal lawsuit by the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, or NAACP. The group argued that there would be a much higher turnout than usual in minority neighbourhoods, and the extra provisions were necessary to accommodate all voters.

AP reports that U.S, District Judge Richard Williams denied the requests but instead ordered local election officials to publicize that all those who were in voting lines by 7 p.m. local time would be permitted to vote.

And just hours before polls opened, John McCain's election campaign filed suit against the Virginia electoral board, pushing to have late military ballots arriving from overseas included in the vote.

In Ohio, where past elections have been marred with voting problems, officials were dealing with the usual voting snags, such as jammed voting machines, but no major issues had occurred.

Elections officials say that for the most part voting has gone smoothly for a majority of people.

"We're taking care of things like that," Franklin County Board of Elections spokesman Ben Piscitelli told AP. "But there's nothing major or systemic."

The total number of people registered to vote is up 7.3 per cent from the last presidential election.

Queues began to form before sunrise in some districts as voters tried to beat the crowds -- amid reports that some voters would have to wait as long as eight hours to cast a ballot.

In New York, voters began lining up as early as 4 a.m. to try and beat the rush. And if the early voter turnout in that state sets a nation-wide tone, election participation will be the highest ever, The Associated Press reports.

Comments are now closed for this story

Sometimes no news is just good news
said

The impression that the media "went easy" on Obama says more about how little he gave them to sink their teeth into than their supposed bias. Hello? These are media conglomerates that would benefit under McCain, not left-wing coffee shops!

Actually, I think the media went easier on McCain. Imagine if Michelle Obama admitted to stealing drugs from her charity to support her habit? We'd still be reading about it.

All the media could get on Obama was that his paths crossed with some jerks -- heck, who hasn't? McCain worked happily alongside ex-members of the KKK. Was that brought up? Some conservatives see consipiracy wherever they aren't actively conspiring themselves.


Gatsby
said

A record high turnout could adversely affect the true interests of the American people and most importantly the Obama campaign. Obama has been effective in rallying the American people to get out and vote, however his efforts were primarily directed at those who have never voted before. It is important to consider that those first time voters won't be so enthusiastic when they reach the polling stations to find out they have to wait for hours. Hopefully these individuals won't be discouraged and tempted to leave without voting. With this I would like to include a quote from Lance Armstrong "Pain is temporary, yet regret lasts forever".

To all the Americans I have one thing to say:

WAIT IN THOSE LINES AND VOTE!








RC of toronto
said

I agree with IM in Ottawa, if the parties want to motivate people to go out and vote and get the same intensity like what Obama has been doing down south, we should get Jim Carrey, Celine Dion, David Foster and other A-Listers to run for office. It's going to be one exciting election season. :)



BP
said

I've heard other people say they wish we could have high voter turnout, it doesn't matter here in the end you vote in 1 person and his policies, we have a system that is one step from a dictatorship, individual MP vote as the PM wishes or your kicked out, its a farce now never has our system given individual representatives so little power to speak on their own. MP's no longer represent their riding's, they represent the Leader of their Party.



GP
said

It’s amazing to think that the greatest legacy of George Bush is that he was such a bad President he acted as the catalyst for facilitating the first Black American President.

If Obama does not win I am positive the world will turn its back on the US as just another example of a sham democracy…just another hollow self serving government that controls its masses with misinformation and manipulation. This is truly a turning point for the US and therefore for us all.

I have seen a few pivotal moments in history…the assassination of Kennedy, the first footsteps on the moon, the fall of the Berlin Wall, 9/11. I believe I am about to witness yet one more in my life.


gilles lebrun
said

To Mike in Ottawa :

Americans do not vote directly for their president either. They vote for a slate of "Electors" who are members of the "Electoral College". These electors are supposed to cast their ballots for the presidential candidate who won the most votes in the State. Some have been known to be renegades...


Andrew - Canada
said

I don't understand why it is so hard for so many to believe that Obama can bring change. A very basic understanding of human nature is all you really need - taking aside the extremely narrow minded views that some people seem to have, fundamentally most people want to be inspired and it is this positive energy that historically has proven to be the catalyst for major change in the world. Anyone who has watched a political debate between 2 intelligent people will quickly understand that it is nearly impossible for the average person to get a clear picture of the intricate impacts of a specific policy. In the absence of having this clear understanding, you need to ask yourself some more basic questions: 1. Who is the more intelligent person (Obama top of his class, McCain the bottom - if you need advice on complex world issues do you go to the extremely smart guy or the not so smart guy?) 2. Who appears to be focused on moving forward in a positive way for vs. slinging mud (McCain has a lot of things in his past that could have been used by Obama in a big way if he wanted to take the low road; cheating on his wife and children, crashing planes in the caribbean, being nearly last in his class at college living a life of excess? 3. What is the objective 3rd party opinion?(nearly every country in the world prefers Obama and believe me, we are all very interested in seeing a result that impacts the rest of us positively) 4. Who just seems like the better person? I think that anyone who is honest with themselves can only answers those questions in favour of Obama.


Andy
said

To Tony: "How many late night comedy/talk shows had paradies of Obama?
Little to none!!

It's not because he is flawless, it's because if you do make fun of him you will be branded a racist and your career will be over.

Obviously racism is also not viewed in the light as sexism other wise they would never have referred to Sarah Palin as "Barbie"


Phil
said

"Dan
Canada's electoral system is broken"

I have to disagree here. We have seperate elections for Parliament, legislature and local councils, and have many polling stations, making the voter load at any one quite light, ensuring htat we do not have linups that last a working day. As well, the design of our ballots makes spoiled ballots difficult to achieve.

How many ballots in the US will be spoiled because of broken machines? How many voters will be disenfranchised by the long wait at inadequate polling stations? How many votes will be lost because of "hanging chads"? More importantly, are those electronic voting machines 100% truly reliable?

The day of the pencil and a single X has not passed. Combined with a national election authority, it means we have a system that works and is as fair as is humanly possible.

As for Dan's complaint about first past the post: tough. It works in every other area of life, and it wirks in politics too. Check how efficient elections and governments are in prop-rep countries. There were complaints about the cost of the last federal election; imagine the complaints if we went to a prop-rep system, with run-off elections. As for the system that awards seats to people based on the percentage of votes cast for a party, I don't think Johnny Canuck woyuld accept that: it smacks too much of the old communist system, where the candidate was irrelevant.

Our system is not broke: why fix it?

Now, down south of us, maybe a fix is in order.




n in toronto
said

looks like an obama victory...i just wish i was convinced people were voting for policies and not hype, retoric, promises of change, etc.
We'll see how he can perform.


Exiled Canadian
said

I just voted and it took me 10 minutes from the moment I got there to when I left. No line whatsoever and I'm in battleground Missouri.

MAC, Obama (just like Dan Quayle) is no JFK. He's eloquent but does not have the background of JFK nor the entrenched political family that JFK had. To think he is some kind of "savior" for the world is foolish. Other leaders will just see him as the president of the US that they have to deal with. Nothing more. Radical Muslims will see him as just another leader of the infidels and will still target the U.S. for attacks.

That's reality. Obama as the savior of the world is as real as the Greek columns during his acceptance speech.


Tony Ont.
said

How many late night comedy/talk shows had paradies of Obama?
Little to none!! The guy is near flawless and there was nothing to pick on for comic relief. The man is steady and calm and I hope he can bring those same assets to the U.S.


GC
said

Energize Canadian voters???

Americans fought for their independence and will always have freedom as part of their DNA. Voting is an extension of that passion.

Canada however slipped into Confederation without any conflict.

When you add far too many parties to choose from, a cultural divide, ignorance of the parties and their platforms and people who are willing to have the media decide their political choices, its no wonder we have voter apathy.








lacluont
said

They don't just vote for president today, they vote for EVERYTHING....including the local dog catcher.....that's why the line ups.


Dave from Hamilton
said

If the voter irregularities continue in this US presidential election, will Canada be prepared to send neutral observers there to ensure the freedom to cast an informed ballot?


One who deals with the US citizens everday
said

Go Obama!!! The USA needs a change and a good change!


IM in Ottawa
said

Some people in these posts have hit the nail right on the head. The USA normally has worst voter turnout than Canada, however this year they've attracted the masses with "star" candidates like Obama and Palin. We'd see the same turnout in Canada should Bryan Adams, Jim Carrey and Celine Dion ran as leaders of the Liberal, NDP and Bloc. (notice how I made Carrey, the clown, leader of the NDP. I kill myself!).


Dan
said

Canada's electoral system is broken. The excitement over elections would be here as well, not because of the leader, but because of the system. Because the US is effectively a two party system, then it polarizes the country and they are either for or against the government. With a multi-party system here and no proportional representation system to reflect that, it results in distorted seat counts. In Alberta, the Tories received 600,000 votes and got 27 seats in Alberta. The Green party got 800,000 votes in Canada and got no seats. The Canadian first past the post system is out of date.


Keith in Brampton
said

US voter turnout is traditionally as bad as or worse than in Canada. Good to see them turn it around.

I note though that the long lines they talk about would turn many off. That may explain some of the voter apathy in the US in past elections, and they need to address it.

I've never experienced any significant wait to vote here; must be the quality of the candidates, rather than line length, that turns off Canadians.


Louise in Alberta
said

We are witnessing history. Hold on, it is going to be a wild ride....no matter who wins!


Anne ottawa
said

I think the apathy in our own election had to do with the candidates, lets just face that fact. Dion was not taken seriously and Harper was the same old, and Layton, forget it. A potential black man in the white house for the first time is big news and it is exciting and historical, people probably feel they want to be a part of it. Re our voter turnout, people here should exercise their right to vote, it is a privilege that should not be wasted. Shame on you whatever your reasons for not voting.


Donna H
said

I don't understand why wait times in lines are as long as 8-10 hours. Why don't they don't open up more locations to people to vote...intead of having one place to vote that serves 100,000 people have 10 places that serves 10,000 each. This might eliminate some of the headaches and inexcusable wait times assocaited with voting in America. Personally, I would not wait that long to vote--my time is important and with the US Ellecotal system my vote does not even really matter--it is the college ellectoral vote that counts and not the popular vote. The government should make it as painless as possible not have to book a day off work, wait 8 hours only to be told that the machines aren't working right so please wait a little longer while we sort this out.


IM in Ottawa
said

Although I am also dissappointed with the low voter turnout, I completely disagree with making voting mandatory. I don't want ill informed and uninterested individuals (who appear to be the majority of Canadians and Americans) determine the future of our respective countries. I include the USA here only because I realize what happens down there affects me up here. Although voting is our civic duty, so is the task of encouraging people to take an active interest in all aspects of our politics. Unfortunately, I can see how people aren't motivated by our current cast of leaders. Their performance in the House of Commons and in front of any camera is an embarrassing spectacle I can't stand to watch anymore. How can I encourage other people to listen to these buffoons? Let alone vote for them.


Mike in Ottawa
said

The problem with our system is that we don't actually get to vote for the prime minister the way the americans can vote for their president. That's where the excitement comes from, because the focus is on those 2 people. Here, we vote for our local MP, which is quite different. I voted for an NDP MP because he's good at his job and has represented the needs of our area well...however, I don't want Jack Layton to be prime minister....so..I think our system is less exciting for that reason.


MAC
said

Not since the Kennedy era have we seen such a remarkable candidate for President of the United States. Mr Obama will win and will start the mammoth task of getting things back to how a country should be run. He has managed an amazing campaign and he seems to be a decent, compassionate man who will make a difference.


Toolie
said

Once again we see barriers for people of colour who are tying to exercise their enfranchisement. It is no different than here in Canada, were voters had to produce an fixed address to vote. Clearly our democratic system is a dubious as our neighbours to the South, however it is my hope that voters are not detered and further, that electoral reform for both our countries will be in place before any more elections.


mrs o
said

let's pray for an honest race,, and hope there isnt any bs, i figure that if there is any it will be with the repubs, they cant loose anything with dignity and if they do that will shock the world and i do hope the americans do better this time, sure sounds like it might happen,, but lets wait and see,,and yes their elections are better than ours,, i think, but in ours nobody cares anymore cause all the parties lie so much or our candidates just dont give a damn to get out there door to door and actually meet you,, so shame on our candidates for your low interest except in getting elected, must be nice..


Binder Dundat. in pickering
said

I agree wit jessie


Reformed Republican
said

Refusal to accommodate voters in Black areas is nothing new- that's how Bush won the election in Florida, with help from his governor brother in 2000. Let's hope this time Republican sleazy tricks don't deny the real victor the prize.


Anne M
said

Canadians make me so mad, I had friends who were touring in the US, and did not vote, even in the early polls because they were too busy planning their trip, to buy a motorhome in the US, as well as spending most of their time there. They have all but abondoned Canada, except for our health and social security system. It is more important to them to bolster the American economy.If they move there, they should be forced to give up their rights to health care and Canada pensions.


mike
said

Americans exercising their rights, good for them.
Canada should make it a holiday and a law that citizens vote or face a fine after the dismal turnout on our last election.


Adam
said

People in canada that do not vote make no sense. I spent 2 hours here in kingston trying to get my vote sent to the right place. I believe in the democratic process of elected officials. If you dont, you shouldnt be calling yourself canadian


lacluont
said

Too bad we couldn't generate this kind of excitment for our election. I hear of Canadians getting so excited over this US election yet.....we had the chance to make changes here but apparently going out to vote was just too much work for some people!


Jessie
said

I wish someone energize the
Canadian Voter It's hard to
take a interest when it seems like nothing changes no matter who's in office



Rob in On
said

Let's hope this election is about policy and change and NOT skin color! Just as it would be shameful to not vote for Obama based on his ethnicity, it would be just as wrong to vote for him solely because he's black. It is time that the U.S. turned the page on racism and I hope Barack Obama wins. But it should be on the ideals and policies he brings to the job, and not because he is a charismatic African American.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Full Coverage

U.S. Election

U.S. Election

News, analysis, quizzes. Follow the Real Clear Politics results.

Election Lexicon

Election Lexicon

From 'Apparatchik' to 'Theocon' .. your U.S. election glossary.

CTV Video Player

Mike Duffy Live

Mike Duffy Live

Tuesday, Nov. 4: Two years of campaigning comes down to a record turnout and some luck.

In Pictures

http://images.ctv.ca/archives/CTVNews/img2/20081104/110_ap_us_voting_081104.jpg

Voting Booth

Follow ordinary voters and the candidates to polling stations.

Global Obama

Global Obama

In Pictures: From Japan to Kenya, catching U.S. election spirit.

Today's Politics Stories

Quebec student strikes, tuition fees, Montreal, Quebec

Quebec students, government to resume talks Monday

More   27 Comments 27    4 Video(s) 4

Newfoundland and Labrador Premier Kathy Dunderdale receives applause from party members as the House of Assembly opens in St. John's on Monday, March 5, 2012. (Paul Daly /  THE CANADIAN PRESS)

EI changes unfair to N.L., Dunderdale says

More   20 Comments 20    1 Video(s) 1

In this Monday, Sept. 19, 2011 file photo, Fereidoun Abbasi Davani speaks during a news conference at the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna, Austria. (AP Photo/Ronald Zak)

Iran says no reason to halt 20 per cent enrichment

More   8 Comments 8  

Most Talked about Stories

It is about time - as a grandparent I have watched our kids (who were allowed to fail although I do remember some nagging on our part) learn, I have watched our children now micro-manage their children. A big part of it is the fact that there are predators out there and an extreme reluctance on the parents part to alllow freedom that might result in the children becoming victims.

Harvey

Parents must learn to stop meddling, author urges