Politics -   

1
A Canadian Coast Guard and Canadian Forces vessel take part in Operation Nanook 08 in the Arctic in late August 2008. (Canadian Forces Combat Camera) Defence Minister Peter MacKay and Chief of Defence Staff Gen. Walt Natynczyk take part in Operation Nanook 08 in the Arctic in late August 2008. (Combat Camera / DND) Prime Minister Stephen Harper wears a wolverine fur stole while meeting mushing teams at the Arctic Winter Games in Yellowknife, N.W.T. on Monday, March 10, 2008. (Jeff McIntosh / THE CANADIAN PRESS)

Canadian Forces carry out Arctic training exercises

Viewer

CTV News Video

Canada AM: Brig.-Gen. Millar, Joint Task Force North
With changing climates bringing a more open arctic, Canada is taking steps to ensure Canadian safety in the region. 'Inuk' will equip Canadian forces to protect against any possible threats in the north.

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (16)Add Comments Facebook   

Date: Mon. Aug. 25 2008 9:41 AM ET

The Canadian military has kicked off a series of training exercises in the Arctic to prepare for situations that may arise as a result of increased traffic in the region.

More than 500 troops -- air, land and sea -- are taking part in Operation Nanook 08, said Brig-Gen. David Millar, commander of Joint Task Force North.

"Our purpose is to exert sovereignty, demonstrate sovereignty and security but also learn how to live off the land and learn more about the operating environment here in the North," Millar told CTV's Canada AM on Monday from Iqaluit, Nunavut.

Millar said the annual exercise is growing in importance because activity in the North is rapidly increasing.

"The Canadian Forces, along with our other government departments, need to be ready to respond to... threats such as environmental accidents, oil spills (and) potentially communicable disease outbreaks on a cruise ship," he said.

As a result, Operation Nanook 08 will simulate three different scenarios:

  • an outbreak of disease on a cruise ship
  • a hostage-taking on a cruise ship
  • a fuel spill and a fire on a Russian cargo ship

Two warships have been deployed for the exercise as well as air force Twin Otters and Aurora surveillance planes.

A record number of civilian agencies, including the Canadian Security Intelligence Service and the Canadian Border Services Agency, are also participating.

Harper heading North

On Tuesday, Prime Minister Stephen Harper will head North for his fourth visit in three years.

The trip comes as observers say the Tories will likely trumpet their record on Arctic sovereignty in the next federal election campaign.

However, Harper is likely to face tough questions after the Tories axed the navy's $2.9 billion project to replace its aging supply ships.

The government, in a statement issued late Friday, also cancelled a tender call for the purchase of 12 mid-shore patrol ships for the coast guard.

Meanwhile, Foreign Affairs Minister David Emerson said Sunday the government views the recent actions of Russia in the Far North "with great concern."

"We've seen much increased activity in terms of Russian overflights of Canadian airspace. The Americans are seeing the same thing around Alaska," he told CTV's Question Period on Sunday.

Emerson said the actions were helping drive the Conservatives' Arctic strategy.

In August 2007, a Russian icebreaker reached the North Pole. Two Russian mini-submarines went down to the seabed and planted a Russian flag there. Russian state television claimed at the time that the expedition would provide the scientific proof for Russia to lay claim to a huge expanse of Arctic seabed.

Emerson described the exercise as "what many thought was a somewhat silly flag-planting incident in Canada's Arctic."

Still, he said Canada is taking responsible steps towards protecting its sovereignty in the Arctic by:

  • Strengthening its Armed Forces, Coast Guard and government services presence in the region
  • Working on territorial disputes through the United Nations
  • Mapping the seabed to support Canada's claim
  • Working with allies like the United States on ways to secure the Arctic

With files from The Canadian Press

1

Add New Comment ( )

John
said
0 0

Anybody who thinks for a moment that Canada can enforce its sovereignity in the Arctic is as delusional as the President of Georgie.

We will not and cannot ever develop the kind of military capacity that will act as a deterrent to an aggressive and committed invader. Our soldiers and sailors will die meaninglessly, and our ships, planes and any other hardware will simply be destroyed and contribute to the environmental degradation of the Arctic.

It is far, far better to negotiate balanced and fair treaties and hope that Russia, China, the US, Denmark or anybody will respect them.

Peacekeeping and disaster-response is ok, but for crying out loud, let's not kid ourselves about what we have and what we can do. And under no circumstances should we seek to antagonize the very people we need to negotiate in good faith with.

We are right to say we 'own' it, but we had better be prepared to watch somebody else come along and take it. Hopefully they will leave us enough table scraps to keep the whining down to a dull roar.


Rod
said
0 0

I agree with some of the posters that we need to support our government and finally look to our Northern areas. This is long over due. I agree with the PM on this one.


Shamaro
said
0 0

This isn't a an excercise becasue of what happened between Russia and Georgia, this is an excercise that has been planned a long time ago.

Canada stopped asserting itself in the north after Chretien took power, however with Harper as Prime Minister, he has made Canadians concsciously take note, that we must assert our soverignty in the north.

Many people do not know, but Russia has over the years, stepped up illegal flights over soverign Canadian territory in the north as they use to do during the cold war era.

We can no longer take for granted of our Northern Territories. With several other nations around the world jockeying for position, Canada had best be on it's guard over our own territory and this is one way of doing so.


Roger T
said
0 0

And what exactly is Harper planning to do, go up against the Russian & US forces with our 100 year old sea king which caught on fire and 2 helicopters! A smile and photo op is not gonna make claims.

Go sea king go, but don't crash and burn.




Steve Daly
said
0 0

Thank God!

The ill-conceived JSS (Joint Support Ship) program has finally been axed. 3 ships for the Navy to use primarily as floating gas stations and they were going to cost nearly $1B each?

Now that the Navy is not saddled with the Liberal plan of JSS they can go ahead with acquiring 3 AORs (direct replacements for the current Navy tankers) and a pair of Roll-On, Roll-Off helicopter carriers to serve in the the strategic transport role.

5 ships instead of 3 and by using in-service designs (like the Schelde Shipbuilding Enforcers) they would be under the $2.9B budget.

Great work from the Conservatives to realize that JSS was an achhor around the Navy's neck!


Rob in Ontario
said
0 0

Protecting Canada's arctic sovereignty should be on the minds of all Canadians, so I'm glad to see these types of exercises taking place in the north.

I am however very disappointed that the gov't has renegged on the production of the needed coast guard and military ships. We can't protect our treasured North without the proper resources.


Robin the Hood
said
0 0

So I wonder if the Russians - or possibly the US - will try to annex some Canadian Arctic territory next??.. I'm sure they are thinking there's some black gold up there. Russia already thinks the North Pole belongs to them.. imagine that.. Santa with a Russian passport!



Mike Webster
said
0 0

I'm glad that we're showing the flag in the far north. It's getting down to the point of "use it or lose it". We can't afford to lose it. It's our territory and unless we're prepared and willing to defend it, it won't stay that way for long. Regarding the ships, they had no choice. The ships that the navy and the designers we haggling over were trying to do too much with too little. It had become apparent that it was not going to be possible to create such multi-role ships within the budget so they did the only responsible thing and canned it in order to start again. Don't think for a moment that we won't get new supply ships - we will. It just means that some of the additional roles that were envisioned for those ships (roles that are not filled by our current supply ships) may not be possible.


Neal
said
0 0

I think Harper is doing the right thing here. Canada must begin to realize that we are a valuable commodity in the world these days. Protecting our sovereignty is important,and as well protecting the inuit way of life. Good job Harper you proving to be a wise leader who should get a majority parliament. Stay the course and "carry on Sir"


France Lindsay, Petawawa Ontario
said
0 0

We must absolutely increase our military presence in the Arctic. Other countries have been making claims which is a direct threat to our sovereignty in the region.

After watching the events that took place in Georgia, it is clear that Russia has now more than ever took steps to become once again a major threat to Canada.

I strongly feel it is up to each and every Canadian to inform themselves thoroughly on the subject then make a stand and support with our Prime Minister Harper in his efforts to establish a strong military presence in the region.
Otherwise... "Our true North strong and free" which is the pride of Canada, might not be ours for much longer.


Bill Tramble
said
0 0

God forbid that the Troops going North run out of supplies because the Tories have seen fit to Axe new supply ships.
Maybe it is time to give Mr. Harper and company the Boot....but then, how do we supply the Boots?


CF from Montreal
said
0 0

I think Canada may be headed for a new kind of 'Cold' war with Russia.


Ward
said
0 0

As more people are added to earth's population, invasion becomes more likely. The only thing people understand is the big stick. Good for Harper, it is a must.


eddytoronto
said
0 0

I think this has somthing to do with Russia and the sneak attack by Georgia on the Russians.

U.S.A special forces involved!

Canada should not be doing these excercises with this Russians in a state of war.

What are we doing are we Crazy to get involved.




TaDa
said
0 0

Sure and what ships will be used now that the money budgeted for ships has 'gone down the drain'!


Ron in Niagara Falls
said
0 0

Finally a Government that stands up for Canada and ALL its Soverenty....

AS for the Liberals they want to be in power and go on a platform of More TAX ?
and Gut the Military Again NO WAY

JUST WHAT I WANT ...PAY MORE TAX...

YA Sure !


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Politics Stories

Quebec student strikes, tuition fees, Montreal, Quebec

Quebec students, government to resume talks Monday

More   27 Comments 27    4 Video(s) 4

Newfoundland and Labrador Premier Kathy Dunderdale receives applause from party members as the House of Assembly opens in St. John's on Monday, March 5, 2012. (Paul Daly /  THE CANADIAN PRESS)

EI changes unfair to N.L., Dunderdale says

More   20 Comments 20    1 Video(s) 1

In this Monday, Sept. 19, 2011 file photo, Fereidoun Abbasi Davani speaks during a news conference at the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna, Austria. (AP Photo/Ronald Zak)

Iran says no reason to halt 20 per cent enrichment

More   8 Comments 8  

Most Talked about Stories

It is about time - as a grandparent I have watched our kids (who were allowed to fail although I do remember some nagging on our part) learn, I have watched our children now micro-manage their children. A big part of it is the fact that there are predators out there and an extreme reluctance on the parents part to alllow freedom that might result in the children becoming victims.

Harvey

Parents must learn to stop meddling, author urges