Politics -
News Sections
Bernier told Karzai to dump Kandahar governor: CTV
CTV News Video
|
Watch: See all Videos in the Player
A A |
Email
|
Print
| Comments (42)
| Add Comments
Tweet
CTV.ca News Staff
Date: Mon. Apr. 14 2008 10:08 PM ET
Foreign Affairs Minister Maxime Bernier directly told Afghanistan's President Hamid Karzai that the governor of Kandahar province should be replaced because he is holding up Canadian development aid, CTV News has learned.
"Officials tell me that Maxime Bernier told President Karzai in a meeting that Governor (Asadullah) Khalid should be removed, that he was a corrupt governor and that he was holding up development aid," Robert Fife, CTV's Ottawa bureau chief, told Newsnet on Monday.
Bernier and Karzai met in Kabul on Saturday, along with French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner.
Reporters asked Bernier on Monday, at the end of his three-day visit to Afghanistan, what Karzai needs to do about corruption in the south.
"They're a sovereign state, they're going to have to decide, it's a decision that the president is will have to take in the near future about the future of the government we're having here (in Kandahar)," Bernier said at the Kandahar Airfield.
"Is it the right person at the right place at the right time? President Karzai will have to answer these questions as soon as possible."
Bernier's officials immediately called the statement a mistake. The Afghans were apparently furious about the foreign interference and Bernier was forced to backtrack. His office released a statement saying, "Afghanistan is a sovereign state that makes its own decisions about government appointments. I can assure you that Canada fully respects this and is not calling for any changes to the Afghan government."
The opposition has pounced on what some say was a political gaffe -- the fact that Bernier went public with private remarks made to another government. The NDP's Jack Layton said, "There's no question there's a competence question that comes when you get this kind of a flip-flop."
While Prime Minister Stephen Harper welcomed Bernier's clarification, he didn't dispute that there were problems in Kandahar.
"We have talked to the government of Afghanistan from time to time about the performance of that government and we will continue to express these concerns to them privately," Harper said.
The Prime Minister's Office issued a statement saying: "Minister Bernier is a bold and aggressive foreign affairs minister and he quickly clarified his comments."
Canada's 2,500 troops operate in Kandahar province. Khalid, who appeared last week with top Canadian military officials at a road-building ceremony, strenuously denied reports earlier this year that he had been involved in the torture of an Afghan prisoner.
Omar Samad, Afghanistan's ambassador to Canada, said Khalid has been an effective governor -- considering the province's struggles against the Taliban.
"I think this governor has done fairly well given the circumstances," Samad told CTV's Mike Duffy Live.
"He's been the target of terrorists many times, he is trying to work the best he can. He needs, of course, a strong team. But it's the president of Afghanistan who decides who will be governor."
Military analyst Col. (ret'd) Mike Capstick, who served on the ground in Afghanistan, said Bernier made a mistake by calling for Khalid's dismissal in such a public manner.
"I can't imagine what the minister was thinking to say that out loud," he said.
Capstick suggested Bernier's comments would create tension between Brig.-Gen. Guy Laroche and Elissa Goldberg, Canada's top civilian representative in Kandahar, "for the next couple weeks."
But he acknowledged that widespread corruption is a lingering problem in Kandahar.
"You can't expect much else after 30 years of conflict. The governance structure is very weak and fragile," he said.
Bernier said he told Karzai during their meeting that the Afghan government must get serious about fighting corruption.
"I think (Karzai) can work with us to be sure the (new) governor will be more powerful ... (and) will do what he has to do to help us."
Fife said Canadian officials in the Kandahar area say that Khalid had consistently blocked efforts to put aid on the ground in the Kandahar area.
There are also allegations of corruption whirling around Khalid, he said.
Asadullah Khalid
An ethnic Pashtun, the dominant group in Kandahar province, Khalid fought with the Northern Alliance against the Taliban.
Karzai first named Khalid governor of Ghazni province in 2002 before transferring him to Kandahar in 2005.
Khalid survived an apparent assassination attempt early this year when a bomb detonated near his motorcade. Other blasts targeted him in May 2007 and in June 2006.
"It is widely believed that Asadullah Khalid gained his position as a result of his excellent relationship with U.S. authorities in Afghanistan," the Senlis Council said in a 2006 report.
"Tough on the Pakistan-Taliban connection, Khalid has become increasingly unpopular in Kandahar due to his poppy eradication campaigns."
The Senlis Council is a think tank that operates an office in Kandahar province and has pushed for a different approach to managing Afghanistan's opium production, suggesting it should be grown legally for medicinal use.
Stephen Saideman, who holds the Canada Research Chair in International Security & Ethnic Conflict at McGill University in Montreal, told Newsnet that Khalid has been supportive of Canadian efforts to enhance security in Kandahar.
However, the governor "is apparently less enthusiastic about other parts of the effort - the focus reconstruction and governance," he said.
Saideman, who toured Afghanistan in December, said Canadian soldiers told him they were able to cajole Khalid into co-operating in those other areas.
Corruption is undeniably an issue in Afghanistan, he said. "I don't have any facts in my hands on whether this guy is more or less corrupt than anybody else."
Another issue is that Karzai likely doesn't have an endless supply of governors, and that the very nature of the job and place could make it difficult to remain entirely free of corruption, Saideman said.
User Tools
Related Stories
CTV News
Canada in Afghanistan
The latest news, photos and interactives from Canada's mission in Afghanistan.
Soldiers Overcome Injuries
Wounded soldiers use sports to overcome injuries, adjust to their new reality.
Interactive
Lessons Learned
A number of the medical innovations that we now take for granted were conceived and tested during wartime.
Bios and Pictures
Canadian Casualties
We remember those who lost their lives in Afghanistan since the mission began in 2002.
In Pictures
Most Popular
Most Viewed News Stories
Most Talked about Stories
It is about time - as a grandparent I have watched our kids (who were allowed to fail although I do remember some nagging on our part) learn, I have watched our children now micro-manage their children. A big part of it is the fact that there are predators out there and an extreme reluctance on the parents part to alllow freedom that might result in the children becoming victims.









Add New Comment ( )
Blue Magic
0
said
0
gilles lebrun
0
said
0
Baird sticks his nose in municipal affairs (Ottawa transit grant), Bernier does the same internationally and SHarper insists that nothing is wrong!
I am very sorry but elected Members of Parliament (MPs) are elected to represent their constituents. If and when they become Cabinet Ministers, they do not speak for Canadians, they speak for the political party governing Parliament.
SHarper should do the honorable thing and remove these Ministers.
Why, oh why, did I comment!!!
Chris in Mississauga
0
said
0
Shamaro
0
said
0
hollinm
0
said
0
So while the media wants to call it a gaffe I say good on Bernier. Call it like you see it. If Karzai doesn't like it tough. However, it is up to Karzai to make the decision about the governor.
Everybody,particularly the NDP should take a pill.
PJR
0
said
0
Doug
0
said
0
On the main issue,I think Bernier stated the obvious.But it was not stated well,or in the right place."Brian" is completely right in saying that most poverty stricken countries are hotbeds of corruption.
Afghanistan,though,has asked the world,through the UN,for help in establishing a country for it's citizens.Our presence there is not just to counter the Taliban insurgents.It also goes to helping them to establish a justice system,roads,a system for elected governments,schools,etc,etc.
WHile I think it's true that ALL countries involved in trying to do this have a right,or even an obligation to make suggestions,I think Mr.Bernier should have spoken in a different venue,and a different tone.
After all,it is our goal to have the elected governement make the choices and decisions.Just as it is our goal to have them able to defend and poice their own country.
THis is not a huge country,but,given their history,and the current environment there,this is a massive project.
God bless all those with the courage to contribute.Especially in view of the fact that it is extremely dangerous,and the end result is not at all certain.After all,it doesn't take much courage to take part in an easy,sure thing kind of a mission.
clayton
0
said
0
Georges
0
said
0
Seerat
0
said
0
Tamouh
0
said
0
John Fonzie
0
said
0
Neil
0
said
0
Richard Andahalf
0
said
0
Shahid
0
said
0
GW
0
said
0
On a more practical level it’s the long haul in the Middle East that concerns me. Anyone who can’t see that WWIII is coming and is going to be about Oil and focused in the Middle East has their head in the sand. Any military missions in the Middle East are doomed to fail and will only exacerbate the situation.
Get out of the Middle East while we still can. The Military is for defending our freedoms and way of life as a last course of action under extreme danger. We are playing into the terrorists hands. They flourish in the anarchy.
Bill A.
0
said
0
Rob in Montreal
0
said
0
FuturePM
0
said
0
Rona from Canmore
0
said
0
John K
0
said
0
I assume that Bernier is thinking of the well being of our Canadian soldiers when he addresses this issue. How can Afghanistan ask Nato to help them, but then expect that nobody addresses concerns?
Brian
0
said
0
Bernier might have been too direct but his comments are accurate.
Ian
0
said
0
Hopefully our country can contribute to the stability of their country for a reasonable amount of time, with reasonable expectation of results from the work that has been contributed. We can use that to define our own success or failure in our country's endeavours.
mac
0
said
0
Yeah, this is exactly the right thing to do: bumbling and stumbling.
Yeah, Bernier, way to go.
Keep on lurching.
Evan from the GTA
0
said
0
It would sound like Karzai has sense, I only wish Harper could fire the dud mayors of this country.
Wrong: Afghanistan is a sovereign state in paper alone. The fact that 3/4 legs supporting it are all foreign (aid agencies, NATO, and fiscal donations) is proof that the country is not in reality a sovereign state. That's like saying from 1945-49 Germany was a sovereign state.
A state is only as sovereign as its ability to tax it's populace, and defend its claimed borders. That is a reality of Geo-Politics
tablogloid
0
said
0
Get out of Afghanistan now. We do not need young Canadians putting there lives on the line for this nonsense. Get out of Afghanistan now!
Fixhist, Toronto
0
said
0
It is only a matter of re-allowing codeine ingredients in shelf medication,rather than in prescription medication.
It was interest of drug cartels to have codeine banned for them to make big $$'s. We must know the third largest economy in US is drug trade. I wouldn't blame us forces of being part in narcotic trade,but involvement of CIA in narcotic trade is a fact.
1) US forces have separate command and control than ISAF in Afghanistan.
Which one of the two is authorized by UNSC?
2) Growing AIDS/Cancer in Africa and third world countries require codeine pain management, Can we as Canadians propose Pharma industry under Afghan compact?
Jayson Mendoza
0
said
0
The fact of the mater is that their grip on power, their soverignty is depending on somebody else defending them. If the leadership in the provice they ask us to protect is making things worse rather then helping us it will hurt the ability of our troops and the Karzi government to win the hearts of the people in Kandahar province and thats dangerous to our troops. We have our troops on the block there, we have full right to express our opinion.
Only one nation in history has been able to express soverignty at the cost of another nation, that is Canada on the US taxpayer. Though as you can see, it is starting to effect our ability to determine what happens in north america. That is simply a reality of the world.
Robinhood
0
said
0
Eric
0
said
0
Enwright
0
said
0
Rich
0
said
0
Know your facts before you talk. Having served there a couple of times now I have seen first hand what we do, and I know who is killing who "wrecklessly". You only need to look back a month or so ago to see the multiple murders of Afghani civilians due to bombings at a gathering. Over a hundred were killed. As well, whenever the Taliban detonate a device, sure they may get one or two soldiers...but everytime there are multiple civilians killed and wounded. Then the Taliban issue a statement saying that they are fighting against the oppression of their religion. Please, nothing is being oppressed by the multinational forces...we have actually assisted in the building of new mosques and infrastructure in the country.
ance
0
said
0
If we don't help them deal with some of their tribal/corruption issues, then stable government will never happen in Afghanistan.
There is scant chance it ever will at any rate, but if we insist on trying to affect changes here, then turning a blind eye and just accepting these shortcomings will not help.
If we're expected to fight and die in Afghanistan, lets suggest, insist, demand...whatever it takes to try and help these people.
Greg from Kitchener
0
said
0
Soverign nation? give me a break, they cannot even control who comes in and out of there borders, and are influenced by Pakistan more than Karzai.
Sheeraz Awan
0
said
0
Believe it or not, but our values in the west are NOT under threat as they are claimed to be by our government.
John
0
said
0
Allan Eizinas
0
said
0
So, I guess that now we intend to micro manage their government as well as give them their freedom, send their little girls to school, rebuild the structures that the Americans have bombed, kill the scumbags and murderers (if we can ever tell them apart from the non-scumbags and the non-murderers) and eradicate the opium crop that is the basis of their economy.
Madness!
glengaffney
0
said
0
MHB
0
said
0
Murray
0
said
0
It is up to them to decide who is the governor, not us.
Yes we are there and we are dying in an effort to help, but that still doesn't give us the right to run their country.
boss
0
said
0
excellent relationship with U.S.
Haseeb Afghani
0
said
0
Just because Canada has military presence in Afghanistan, it doesn't have the right to try to interfere in internal affairs of a soverign nation.