Politics -   

1
CFB Gagetown Veterans Affairs Minister Greg Thompson makes the announcement at a press conference in Fredericton, N.B. Sept. 12, 2007. Defence Minister Peter MacKay speaks at a news conference in Fredericton, N.B. on Wednesday, Sept. 12, 2007.

Agent Orange payment inadequate, critics say

Viewer

CTV News Video

CTV Atlantic: Andy Campbell on who is compensated
atv12_orange
CTV Newsnet: Agent Orange Association reaction
KW12_agent

A A |  Email ThisEmail  | PrintComments (10)Add Comments Facebook   

Date: Wed. Sep. 12 2007 6:06 PM ET

The federal government has announced a compensation package that will see a one-time payment of $20,000 awarded to people harmed by Agent Orange and other herbicides on a New Brunswick military base.

Defence Minister Peter MacKay and Veterans Affairs Minister Greg Thompson made the announcement at a news conference Wednesday in Fredericton, N.B., not far from Canadian Forces Base Gagetown.

There are several conditions attached to the funds:

The money will be given to veterans and civilians who worked on or lived within five kilometres from CFB Gagetown between the years of 1966 and 1967.

"They had not invited Agent Orange into their world and they didn't want it to become part of their lives, but it did," Thompson told the gathering on Wednesday.

They must have illnesses associated with Agent Orange to be eligible for compensation.

Those illnesses include Hodgkin's disease, lymphoma, respiratory cancers, prostate cancer and type 2 diabetes.

The primary caregiver of qualified candidates who have died after Feb. 6, 2006, will also be considered for compensation.

It is believed about 4,500 people will be applying for the compensation. The total cost of the program is $96 million.

The U.S. military used Gagetown as a testing ground for powerful chemicals such as Agent Orange and Agent Purple that causes leaves to fall off of plants. They tested them on a small section of the base for a period of seven days in 1966 and 1967. Federal officials insisted it was the only time the herbicides were ever sprayed in Canada.

More herbicides were used at Gagetown from the 1950s to the 1980s that were all laced with dioxin, a chemical that has been linked to a slew of health problems for people, including cancer. However, they were federally approved for use.

Since the 1980s, herbicides containing dioxins have been banned in Canada. However, there were some versions available commercially that were used in Gagetown as well as other places in Canada and around the world. It is commonly used for clearing brush around rail and power lines.

Nonetheless, people who fell ill from exposure to those herbicides will not be eligible for compensation.

The government says restricting the money to those exposed to Agent Orange was a tough decision, but one based on science.

"At the end of the day, what we're doing is fair and it's compassionate, and I believe it will bring a resolution to the issue on the base," said Thompson.

Package 'totally inadequate'

Ken Dobbie, head of the Agent Orange Association in Canada, called the package "totally inadequate" and said the fight is far from over.

"This package needs a massive overhaul, $20,000 is just not enough," he said, speaking with CTV Newsnet Wednesday afternoon. "We have people in our association and also in the class action that spend more than that in a year for prescription medications."

He said the best thing about the package is that it doesn't include any waivers, which means people could still get the funds and be able to take the matter to court.

"We'll continue to push for adequate compensation and also for a full public inquiry," he said. "In addition, we'll also continue in the courts for class action against the government.

The Opposition echoed Dobbie's comments, saying the government's announcement comes nowhere close to fulfilling its promise to veterans.

"They are making modest payments to a very limited group of people," Liberal MP Albina Guarnieri, the veterans affairs critic, said in a news release. "This contrasts sharply with the promise made by Stephen Harper in the last election of full and fair compensation for persons exposed to defoliant spraying from 1956-1984.

"After making a promise to 150 thousand veterans worth $3 billion, 97 per cent of at-risk veterans have been left out."

Studies find herbicides not a major threat

But several studies have found that, in fact, the herbicides posed less of a threat than believed and have a minimal impact on local residents and those involved in spraying the herbicide.

The studies found that generally, the people at the greatest risk were those directly involved in mixing, applying and clearing brush during the spray applications.

Furthermore, a study by environmental researchers in Ontario found that the number of people dying or suffering from cancer near Gagetown is comparable to the number of people with the disease in all of New Brunswick.

The study also found that men in Gagetown have a slightly reduced risk of dying from cancer compared to men living in the rest of the province. The finding shocked veterans.

"It's for sure not everybody is going to be covered ... but I believe that all the people that are sick and have something wrong with them will be covered,'' said Dobbie. "We want an extension on this for people who will get sick after this is over with."

With a report from CTV Atlantic's Andy Campbell and files from The Canadian Press

1

Add New Comment ( )

Bruce
said
0 0

The Harper government is trying to give some comfort to those victims and correct old injustices that previous (mostly Fiberal) governments ignored. Who ever said Fiberals where the party of compassion?


Steve T
said
0 0

What am I missing here? Studies show that these herbicides don't cause health problems for the majority of people exposed, and cancer rates are normal. Yet they are getting $20k, and complaining about it?? Typical of our apologist society where anyone who whines gets money, regardless of the merits of their case. Look at the residential school "healing" money for another example of this.


Michael Bellemare
said
0 0

I agree with Raffi. This scientists knew exactly what they were creating when they developed these herbicides and pesticides. It is a well documented fact that dioxin is linked to cancer. There are thousands of Vietnam Veterans who became sick from the constant spraying of Agent Orange on the foliage when they were conducting combat patrols. It is only fair that these personel who were exposed to the chemical be compensated accordingly. I find the government's investigation highly suspect that it did not find any evidence to back up the Agent Orange claims from sick personel. This kind of investigation goes back to Croatia when numerous soldiers returned home sick after being exposed to some kind of chemical ie: red dirt for sand bags/bunker construction. The government investigated that one, and came up inconclusive - boy imagine that!!!!!


wc
said
0 0

I agree with Devon about judgement by hindsight but I also agree that 20K doesn't go far when dealing with prescriptions.

How about an addendum for prescription assistance along with the 20K.


Raffi
said
0 0

This is in response to Devon's post, in that what you have stated is not entirly true. First let me suggest a good read for anyone interested in this subject; "A Higher form of killing".


By the 1960s the Unites states, Great Britain, and Canada were trilaterally working on the development on new and more potent chemical/biological weapons. It was about this time where nerve agents such as VX were in large scail research and development, and the affects were well known by scientists. To make my point, one of the main substances used in the production of VX and other nerve agents was infact dioxin. This goes to show that "we didn't know" excuse is untrue.

Once again, the book I had suggested is a good read and looks into the secret world of chemical and bioglogical development and even discusses the uses of Agent Orange.


K. Blake
said
0 0

We may not have known how dangerous these chemicals were at the time but do we not have a responsibility to find out prior to using a new chemical? A sad mistake was made and we pay for our mistakes. $20,000 does not come close to paying for this mistake. Should we be investing in overpriced laser guided bombs or should we be investing in people harmed by our mistakes? The same is true of surviving spouses of the Military. Is it bombs or extended benifits? Time to get our priorities in line and get rid of a government intent on investing in weapons of mass destruction and replace them with a government that invests in people.


Devon K.
said
0 0

Two of the comments here require comment! This wasn't a terror act by any definition. Back in the day no one knew that any of these herbicides were dangerous to humans. They were seen as purely herbicides. I recall a story of workers in Nova Scotia who used to wash their hands with chemicals laden with PCBs because it cleaned off the grease better than any thing else. People had no idea that these things were so toxic and it took decades for the long term effects to be seen. The Canadian government has stepped up to compensate these people because it was the Canadian government that conducted the tests together with the American government.

I may sound callous in this but why is compensation given in these cases? No one knew and the science didn't exist back then to determine the toxicity of these chemicals. What is the mechanism that says people should get compensated for things no one knew was dangerous decades ago?


Darlene
said
0 0

Why are the Canadian taxpayers on the hook for this if it was the US military spraying Agent Orange? Why aren't we going after compensation from them?


Buddy K.
said
0 0

Using chemical weapons on people is a "terror act" if there ever was one.

Now you pay via your tax money for the acts of rotten and cruel government. They try and cover up there acts of terror...wait till most of the victims are dead...then deny again...This will continue till the politician is held accountable for what they did...


Gregory Boudreau
said
0 0

Why does it take so long for these things to get resolved, it seems to me that this should of been taken care of a long time ago.
People should not have to go through such a long and draining process just to get some well deserved compensation.It amazes me how we treat our military, and people who work on military bases.


Share with your social Network:

Facebook DIGG Newsvine Delicious Twitter StumbeUpon Reddit Yahoo! Buzz

 

Advertisement

Contest

Today's Politics Stories

Myanmar's opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi, left, is welcomed by Thailand's Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra during a dinner reception at Navy headquarters in Bangkok, Thailand, Thursday, May 31, 2012. (AP / Thai Spokesman Office)

Suu Kyi presses for migrants' rights in Thailand

More

U.S. President Barack Obama and former U.S. President George W. Bush walk from the stage in the East Room of the White House in Washington after unveiling of the Bush portrait, Thursday, May 31, 2012. (AP / Carolyn Kaster)

Bush, Obama share stage, laughs at the White House

More   10 Comments 10    1 Video(s) 1